Trust and accountability

Why does the Cabinet at EDDC not trust its elected members? The Tories have a large majority, so even if it did not trust OTHER councillors it can, presumably, rely on its own members to agree with its policies.

It seems, from the element of surprise shown, that neither minority councillors nor majority councillors could be trusted by the Cabinet with the knowledge that EDDC was seeking a “Greater Exeter” solution to its current problems.

It also seems that those same majority and minority councillors could not be trusted to give useful input and feedback on a plan to move from Knowle to … well, where rather depends what month you are in!

If you are the Leader of a Cabinet that does not trust the majority of councillors, whatever their political persuasion, and keeps most of its business secret, why on earth would a councillor not in the Cabinet continue to accept such a situation?

Voters expect their councillors to represent them, yet how can they do this when the councillors themselves have no idea what is going on with two of the biggest issues facing the council.

To that we must add a third: the lack of a Local Plan and no 5 year land supply and all the problems that is causing. Yet we hear nothing from majority councillors on this dreadful state of affairs, and none of them seem to feel the need to question what is going on.

The Overview and Scrutiny Committee should be investigating these matters, instead of which it is just another rubber stamp committee which asks no questions and uncovers nothing that needs critical examination.

The only hope is that the public can shine lights – but their speaking rights have now been severely constrained, again with almost no dissent from ordinary majority party councillors.

Something is surely badly amiss in the “sovereign state” of East Devon.

Is the (latest!) relocation plan best for business?

From a correspondent:

‘As the EDA website correctly points out, EDDC recognises that local government reorganisation is in the offing.

But Chief Executive Mark Williams has already stated that in the event of local government reorganisation, the Knowle would have to be sold. Save Our Sidmouth (SOS) recently issued a press release highlighting his comments. If the Knowle will be sold for this reason, as Williams predicts, then logically so would the new HQ at Honiton and the surplus space at Exmouth. Why, then, are we proposing to spend £10 million + on a new building that can only be sold for a fraction of that cost?

The extremely lame offering from EDDC is that the new building could be used as a bigger East Devon Business Centre. Unfortunately, that idea has been scuppered by their recently commissioned Carter Jonas report, prepared when they wanted to close the Business Centre and use the funds to build Skypark, which concluded that the Business Centre was out of date, under-used and losing money….

Another definition of “sovereign”

Definition of sovereign in Oxford English dictionary:
NOUN

“supreme ruler”, especially a monarch: as in:

the Emperor became the first Japanese sovereign to visit Britain

Emperor Diviani … hmm … perhaps we shall soon see him in a toga with a laurel-leaf crown.

But beware the Ides of … May 2015!

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/sovereign

EDDC Tory party line on omnishambles: East Devon is “sovereign”

Response sent to a correspondent by EDDC councillor Peter Sullivan on the EDDC omnishambles. You can see the original request at the end of this post.

Interestingly, the reply was copied by Councillor Sullivan to EDDC councillor Phil “I am not and never have been a Whip” Twiss, who responded:

“Thanks for cutting to the chase on this one Peter and saying it as it is”.

Here is the reply, below is the original request for information. You be the judge – if we are a sovereign state. (NB: our bold text)

Definition: “sovereign”: 1. One that exercises supreme, permanent authority, especially in a nation or other governmental unit, as:
a. A king, queen, or other noble person who serves as chief of state; a ruler or monarch.
b. A national governing council or committee.
2. A nation that governs territory outside its borders.
3. A gold coin formerly used in Great Britain.

Dear [Correspondent]

“A memorandum of understanding has been put together which is a starter for taking forward shared services. It will put document on the table which we can now debate within the council and which can go through the democratic process. Without a document on the table there is nothing to discuss.

For as long as I have been a member there have been calls from all political parties for greater links between neighbouring councils I just see this as an on-going process.

In other areas of the country councils are coming together forming combined authorities and attracting considerable financial investment. Although this is not Unitary if that is your concern – the reorganisation into unitary will cost millions, it was about £120M + on-going costs in Cornwall’s case and they are now devolving to 19 regions within the county.

It’s about working together and maintaining our own sovereignty.

As for Sky Park and Manstone this was and has been going through a continuous evaluation recently and this has always been the stated position, as we all know this was only a preferred option not the final agreement as with any business case no decision will be made until ALL the relevant facts and figures are known and with member discussion.

I can remember a major exercise like this with a previous employer who had eventually to look at three different new locations / options for a new HQ, interestingly though it was the Board that made the final decision, the shareholders and workforce and public (even though there was public finances involved ) were informed after the event.

I believe we are being a lot more open and democratic with the way we are moving forward with our future plans.

As you know these issues will be discussed in future council meeting.

Peter Sullivan
[Conservative councillor for Sidmouth Town ward]

This was in response to this enquiry:

Councillors, (also sent to Cllrs Kerridge and Newth)

Three decisions with potentially major consequences for the people of east Devon have been announced by EDDC this week.

1. An agreement has been signed for ever closer union with Exeter and Teignbridge councils.

2. Skypark has been abandoned as a potential site for a new council HQ.

3. The Manstone depot may now be retained as an employment site and accommodate depot facilities currently based at Knowle

I can find no record of any Council, Cabinet, Working Party or sub-committee at which these proposals may have been discussed so can you, as my representatives on EDDC, please tell me:-

1. When and by what means did you first become aware of these decisions?

2. Do you know which Councillors or Officers were involved in making these decisions and on what authority they were published?

I look forward to your responses

[A correspondent]
Sidmouth

‘Will Tory turkeys vote for Christmas?’

Some thoughts sent in to EDA

In the event of the Exeter/East Devon/Teignbridge merger, the political makeup of the new authority will be very interesting. At present it is as follows:

Teignbridge: 22 Conservatives, 10 LibDems, 13 Independents, 1 Ukip
Exeter: 10 Conservatives, 3 LibDems, 27 Labour
East Devon: 42 Conservatives, 10 LibDems, 7 Independents

Total: 74 Conservatives, 23 LibDems, 27 Labour, 20 Independents, 1 Ukip.

It would be a Conservative controlled council, but only just.

Nobody believes for one moment that the three authorities will remain politically independent, or will be allowed to remain so under local government reorganisation. The idea of a shared workforce, based in Exeter, serving three different authorities and 145 councillors is obviously ludicrous.

So, if there is to be a Greater Exeter Authority, then there will be far fewer councillors, perhaps 60 or so. And political control will be very uncertain.

Will our East Devon Conservative councillors vote for a new regime that will leave then with 20 rather than 59 councillors, and perhaps in opposition?

Will Tory turkeys vote for Christmas?’

The expelled ex-Councillor Graham Brown planning decision

A number of apparent anomalies in Mr Brown’s planning application may have led to its just-published refusal, by an EDDC officer. But should the application it have been heard in public and how many councillors would have had to disqualify themselves from the decision-making if that had happened?

It is also to be noted that, whilst he was leading the East Devon Business Forum and Chairman of the (then secret) Local Development Framework group at EDDC, he may have been aware that he was in a difficult planning position regarding his own home.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-planning-officers-reject-councillor/story-24730506-detail/story.html

Councillors then and now

“I JUST couldn’t believe my eyes when I read “We risk having a council run by officers”, Gazette, November 18, on Cllr Bob Evans’ views on the Campaign for Democracy in Mid Devon.

I became a local councillor (not in this area) way back in the 1970s when local government was being reorganised into larger units replacing the old town and rural councils, and I remember hearing the chief executive of one of the unitary councils telling us we had more power than an MP. That was then – but certainly not now.

As for the argument about the council being run by the officers should the committee structure be re-introduced, that can work both ways. If one could rely on seven strong councillors making up a cabinet, the cabinet system might work. If you select your seven cabinet members on the strength of their party allegiance and length of service, the results can be very suspect.

The cabinet system may be quicker, but is it achieving the sort of results local people want? Not in my view. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. And the lack of an effective system of questioning and seeking to identify and improve weak areas in any proposed policy decision (such as the present system whereby the cabinet can over-rule the scrutiny committee) allows just that scenario.”

JEAN TENNANT Former district & town councillor

http://www.middevongazette.co.uk/Cabinet-quick-results-wrong/story-24667479-detail/story.html

A conundrum and a choice to be made

It appears that all members staff of the University of Exeter were informed of the joint agreement on Exeter City Council, Teignbridge and East Devon working together at the same time that EDDC councillors who had been kept in the dark were told.

If you were an EDDC councillor, not in with the top boys and girls, would you be somewhat annoyed? But will the non- whipped majority party be able to keep a lid on such annoyance?

Time to choose: Leader and his message and his coterie or community, your own voice and service!

EDDC in danger of breaking the law with Skypark? Is there a smokescreen and/or a smoking gun?

No wonder EDDC wanted to keep its deliberations about a move to Skypark secret!

In Cabinet minutes they reveal:

However, within the negotiation, due diligence process and legal advice it has become clear that such an arrangement could potentially fall outside of European Union regulations. This would have then required a new site search exercise, cost and delay.”

Now, what was the deal that might have been unlawful? When was it revealed that it might be unlawful? How much did the legal advice cost? Did the project continue after the advice was given? Is this the real reason the project was abandoned and the loss of the supermarket just a smokescreen?

Click to access 031214-cabinet-agenda-public-version.pdf

page 37 onwards

If Honiton and Exmouth now makes so much sense why waste hundreds of thousands of pounds on Skypark?

All efforts now are towards saying what a sensible and brilliant idea EDDC upper echelons have come up with for Exmouth and Honiton presence.

So why did they waste hundreds of thousands of pounds of OUR money on Skypark?

From their press release we learn:

It is clear there is a need to increase service provision for housing benefits, Council Tax, housing advice and register and debt advice in both Exmouth and Honiton and there would be significant demand led presences in Sidmouth and Axminster.

“The council would provide surgeries in other towns as they do in Cranbrook, Seaton, Ottery St Mary, and would experiment with frequency and range of services depending on demand.”

It must have ALWAYS been clear that Exmouth, Honiton, Sidmouth and Axminster needed to be close to accessible services and that the need for these services would only increase as development increases. (Oddly Seaton doesn’t seem to need them – perhaps it will be left stateless when new mergers take place!).

Yet, given all of the above, Skypark was chosen. Why?

It is absolutely impossible to pull the wool over our eyes, EDDC – you blew it, you blew it spectacularly and no amount of “justification” for the latest plan will persuade us otherwise.

See you at the ballot box – though we would suggest to disenfranchised majority party councillors, as much in the dark as minority ones it seems, that a change at the top is now called for – and long overdue!

Clearest hint yet of full merger of EDDC with other councils

From its press release yesterday which makes it clear that EDDC expects to be subsumed into a larger authority. The question is: how long have they known and with which councillors did they share the information?

….. “In the longer term, the council needs to consider the shape of local government.

“A combined Honiton and Exmouth office base offers a more flexible approach to our accommodation requirements involving new and modernised offices in two locations.

“In a world of increasing co-operation between local authorities, a smaller headquarters and an accessible presence around the district offers a better proposition for our customers.

“If a successor organisation or other local government arrangement inherited Knowle from the council it is unlikely that such care would be shown toward its future use as shown by the East Devon District Council.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-District-Council-cabinet-members-set/story-24683413-detail/story.html

And about that Local Plan….

An EDA correspondent writes, “Don’t forget that EDDC have been co-operating with Exeter and Teignbridge regarding the SHMA! Which has been delayed and delayed again, largely because EDDC, Teignbridge and Exeter cannot agree upon the methodology and outcome. Thus leaving us high and dry without a Local Plan. So much for cooperation, and saving money by acting together.”

For EDDC’s announcement yesterday, see https://eastdevonwatch.org/2014/11/25/greater-exeter-a-profoundly-undemocratic-decision/

The Omnishambles Buck Stoppers Awards go to …

“Buck of the Millenium” awards go to:

Leader Paul Diviani – Leader, that’s a clue!  He led his fellow-councillors up the Skypark creek and dropped them in their supermarket boat without paddles.

To the members of the Relocation Working Party for … well for nothing- wasting public money perhaps? Councillors Bloxham, Buxton, Cox, Diviani (of course), Elson, Gazzard, Hull, Moulding, Newth, Stott and Twiss. Particular mention here for Councillor Newth who, as a Sidmouth councillor, allowed the Knowle and all its employees to slip away on her watch.

Special mentions must go to the Chief Executive Mark Williams and particularly to the Deputy Chief Executive Richard Cohen who managed to make the whole process so secret that no checks and balances could take place, let alone consultation. It is possible that the fatal flaws would have been spotted much earlier had they been in the public domain so why … .

And, last but definitely not least, let us not forget “embedded” Relocation Manager Steve Pratten, hired out from Davis Langdon for a huge fee to provide us with …. er … pass.

To all these we would really like to say ….. goodbye.

A statistic: the amount of money spent on this failed project would have paid a good part of the upgrade costs of the Knowle.

Other quick news in brief

Expelled-ex-Tory Councillor Graham Brown (former Chairman of the first Local Plan panel and former Chairman of the East Devon Business Forum) has had his application for a certificate of lawfulness in breach of a restrictive covenant for more than 10 years at his home at Ware Farm refused:

https://planning.eastdevon.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=NAL75PGHGMQ00

Feniton developers Wainhomes make their buyers agree to a restrictive covenant that says they must not object to adjacent development:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Feniton-developer-prevents-home-buyers-objecting/story-24680275-detail/story.html

THERE WAS NO PLAN B! ALL WAS DEPENDENT ON A NEW SUPERMARKET AND NOW PANIC PLANNING

Oh, the panic!  No supermarket so no Skypark – now what!  Think, think …. oh heck, we’ve sold the Knowle site – humungous panic.  Wait, wait, there’s some space in Exmouth, there’s some space at the East Devon Business Centre (especially now we have told tenants they will need to leave), yeah, that should do it, quick, quick, a press release, oh heck, how are we going to talk our way out of this one, how can we fix it before the next election!  Now, who can I pass the buck to?  What, me, buck – no way!

Oh, and someone had better tell the councillors – oh damn, they have read it first on the EDA website and the Express and Echo.

That’s another fine mess you’ve got me into  Ollie …. Ollie …. where are you Ollie!

Time to lie down in a darkened room …. what’s that, the last person left and turned the lights out?

 

Extract from council papers:

Report to: Cabinet

3 December 2014

Relocation Update – key decision

Purpose of report

In particular to make Members aware that Marketing of Knowle and Manstone sites is completed and further discussions with bidders are in progress and ….. to advise Members of changed circumstances and proposed changes to the preferred new HQ site.

Recommendation

1.  Note project progress following the previous update report of4 June 2014

2. Recognise emerging changes to the relocation project agreethe following:

a.  The marketing exercise for Knowle and Manstone has resulted in a range of offers and , following a detailed assessment process,

we have received price, form and quality of development propositions that merit further detailed negotiation toward selection of a preferred developer.

  1. Leading offers for Knowle do not include options to sell Manstone in which case EDDC can choose to retain Manstone for the foreseeable future as a depot function and continued employment use .
  2. The reduced offer for EDDC’s Heathpark site no longer represents a sufficiently persuasive level of capital receiptand will not be pursued further.
  1. The retention of Heathpark in EDDC ownership means that this now represents the most cost effective and straightforward location to develop a new headquarters building for the Council.
  2. Relocation to Skypark is no longer a viable proposition based on the reduced offer for Heathpark and combination of Knowle market value and prudential borrowing.
  3. The East Devon Business Centre (EDBC) should preferablybe retained and could potentially be combined within a new EDDC HQ development.

In the interim, Exmouth Town Hall has been vacated by Devon County Council Services and represents a new opportunity within the relocation plan.

  1. A new HQ in Honiton can be restricted in size and cost to a170 desk equivalent scale with an improved Exmouth Town Hall for 80 EDDC staff as a main satellite office in the District’s largest community.

As part of its commitment to more mobile working and accessibility, the Council will offer a service presence as customers require in future at locations elsewhere in the District.

  1. That relocation continues to make financial and operational sense on a whole life cost basis, specifically 20 yr. projections

combining capital receipt and repayment of prudential borrowing versus existing office running cost and unfunded expenditure on

existing building repair, maintenance and improvement.

Authorise the Deputy Chief Executive (Development, Regeneration and Partnership) in consultation with the Office

Accommodation Executive Group to take forward further actions in pursuit of the above recommendations and Project

Plan

4.  Agree that further reports are produced for Cabinet and Council on project progress and to seek formal approval for any disposal of Knowle

 AND MORE MAJOR COCKUPS:

Between Feb 2014 and now circumstances have changed. The offer price for our Heathpark site has reduced. The supermarket concerned has, along with others in the sector, revised its business model. In this case the retailer revised their offer around a reduction in size of food storeand significantly reduced the offer price for the site. This reduced offer takes a significant sum of
money out of the funding package to deliver a new build at Skypark as well as providing a replacement of EDBC. Also, a key plus point regarding Skypark was the prospect of a turn-key guaranteed maximum price arrangement to completion of a new HQ that would minimise uncertainty and reduce risk
.

However, within the negotiation, due diligence process and legal advice it has become clear that such an arrangement could potentially fall outside of European Union regulations. This would have then required a new site search exercise, cost and delay.

Do recall that, all down the line, EDDC insisted that the relocation would be “cost neutral”!

 

 

STOP PRESS: EDDC U-TURN: SKYPARK OUT, EXMOUTH AND HONITON IN

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/East-Devon-District-Council-cabinet-members-set/story-24683413-detail/story.html

Cabinet agenda – including costs information on Knowle refurbishment

Click to access 031214-cabinet-agenda-public-version.pdf

One highlight:

ED Leisure Management Ltd has requested additional funding of £400,000 to support its capital investment in Exmouth Leisure Centre, including the provision of indoor climbing,increased gym and studio facilities.
BUT NOT A WORD ABOUT NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN EAST DEVON, EXETER AND TEIGNBRIDGE ON A JOINT WORKING AGREEMENT BEING SIGNED.

 

EDDC’s Skypark move is off!

Surprise, surprise! The following statement has just been issued by East Devon District Council:

25 November 2014

Development at Knowle and changes to destination to be considered by cabinet

Significant changes to the preferred location of new council offices in East Devon will be discussed at cabinet next week (Wednesday, 3 December).

Cabinet will hear the latest developments since it was last reported in February and how changing market conditions mean that SkyPark is no longer the preferred option.

Whilst SkyPark has been the leading contender as the relocation site, the council was very clear that no decision was going to be made on the final location until all the facts and figures were known with other key pieces in what is a complex jigsaw slotting in to place.

Instead, recommendations to cabinet are to retain the council-owned Heathpark site in Honiton and potentially combine East Devon Business Centre with a new headquarters. This will allow existing tenants of the business centre to remain.

In addition, it is recommended that the council use the existing office space at Exmouth Town Hall, recently vacated by Devon County Council. This would allow for a smaller building in Honiton and existing tenants at Exmouth Town Hall to remain.

Interest

Marketing of Heathpark began last year and the highest value commercial interest came from a supermarket operator. The offer price negotiated at that time was attractive as part of the funding package to relocate to SkyPark but the supermarket reduced its offer in line with a new business sector model. The reduced offer makes a sale of the site no longer attractive.

In response to marketing of Knowle and Manstone, a mix of proposals were received, which contained variations on residential, retirement and/or care and extra care communities whilst retaining the public park. All proposals were based on the removal of existing buildings at Knowle (whilst keeping or re-provisioning the bat roost). A range of matters still need to be explored before selecting a preferred bidder but once selected, it will be for the developer to enter into discussions with the planning authority to explore proposals.

Among the bids are proposals to develop Knowle only. It could well be that a preferred developer is selected that leaves Manstone to continue operating as a depot for the time being. The depot functions currently provided at Knowle Depot would be transferred across to Manstone.

New build at Honiton and refurbishment of Exmouth Town Hall will be funded by capital receipts and prudent borrowing. Over a 20 year period the spend will at least pay for itself with savings accruing after then. This would allow the council to remove itself from a costly, uncertain and increasingly impractical future at Knowle.

Essential repair works to existing buildings would cost £1.5 million and there is no funding allocation to cover this cost. Refurbishment of all existing buildings would cost up to £15.9m. Knowle has high annual energy costs of £83,900 per year compared to a predicted energy cost for Honiton/Exmouth combined of £33,700 per year.

Operationally, a twin site approach accommodating around 250 officers will be supported by mobile working. The council aims to expand its digital offering and has an ongoing project to improve existing online transactions and develop a further online service for customers who would like to do their business online.

Demand

Sites in two of East Devon’s major towns provide an ideal opportunity for the council to respond to the demand for various services. It is clear there is a need to increase service provision for housing benefits, Council Tax, housing advice and register and debt advice in both Exmouth and Honiton and there would be significant demand led presences in Sidmouth and Axminster.

The council would provide surgeries in other towns as they do in Cranbrook, Seaton, Ottery St Mary and would experiment with frequency and range of services depending on demand.

In the longer term, the council needs to consider the shape of local government. A combined Honiton and Exmouth office base offers a more flexible approach to our accommodation requirements involving new and modernised offices in two locations. In a world of increasing co-operation between local authorities, a smaller headquarters and an accessible presence around the district offers a better proposition for our customers.

If a successor organisation or other local government arrangement inherited Knowle from the council it is unlikely that such care would be shown toward its future use as shown by the East Devon District Council.

Cabinet’s decision next week will then be considered by full council on Wednesday, 17 December.

East Devon District Council expenditure 2010-2014

A correspondent has put together a group of Excel spreadsheets of all EDDC expenditure over £500 between 2010 and 2014. Figures are arranged by year, by payee, by cost centres, etc. and were provided by EDDC as required by law.

The document is HERE eddc_over500

Of course, of as much interest is payments NOT included here. Already one eagle-eyed viewer has noted that there do not seem to have been any payments made to the East Devon Business Forum. Even if it was paid monthly there are some payments far below the £500 per month threashold when such payments must be advertised.

Please feel free to comment here or email us at

eastdevonwatch@gmail.com

if you see any anomalies.

Greater Exeter “a profoundly undemocratic decision” and with a hidden agenda?

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Concerns-raised-8220-profoundly-undemocratic-8221/story-24674620-detail/story.html

and an interesting comment on Independent councillor Claire Wright’s blog:

It would be so dangerously easy to misconstrue this development as an attempt to coordinate housing development for builders rather than address the real agenda that means something to the electorate. Or is it that this development is the sweet spot for the various individuals involved, because they have quite deliberately chosen to focus on development rather than caring for the community. Still, elections are coming so best hurry through what you can while you can?”

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/site/comments/east_devon_district_council_to_form_partnership_with_teignbridge_and_exeter