Hugo Swire declines to explain himself on BBC Spotlight

Good report on BBC Spotligh which did not show Hugo Swire in a good light, making much of his well-to-do background. Surprise, surprise, he declined an interview with them!

There then followed an item on local food banks (imagine how many people the money raised by him at his “Benefits Jokes” auction would have fed). Note that Claire Wright frequently comments and feels enraged by the local deprivation that makes them necessary.

Then followed an item about beavers being returned to the River Otter – something that Claire Wright has strongly campaigned for since thet were first discovered there and before others got on the bandwaggon (Hugo simply noted recently that he was pleased to hear they might return).

Shame Spotlight could not have contrasted the two main contenders different aporoaches and styles.

Coincidentally I then turned on to a delayed ITV news to see a clip of David Cameron being severely heckled by pensioners about the health service.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-cameron-heckled-pensioners-tries-5392771

Again something on which Claire Wright tirelessly campaigns.

Not a good day for Mr Swire or his party!

East Devon will have one of the highest populations of over 65s/over 85s in the country by 2030

A new report reveals that East Devon will be one of the districts to see an above average increase in pensioners, with 36 per cent of its population over the age of 65 by 2030 and ten per cent of those will be over 85 – currently the percentage over 65 is 18%. At the same time the proportion of under 16’s will fall to only 14%.

Seems like the vast majority of the people living in those little boxes in Cranbrook will be in low-paid, zero hours contracts looking after old people.

And where does this appear in our Local Plan?

Source: Office of National Statistics/Express and Echo (page loading problem for wrb address)

It’s not which party you are, it’s whether you are in the majority!

Here are Conservatives talking about the actions of the Labour majority in Plymouth. It really doesn’t matter what the subject is (in this case provision for travellers sites) and it is spooky how the amount of money spent by the majority party (Labour) is so similar to that spent on relocation so far here in Tory East Devon.

What matters most, it seems, is that it seems the party in power likes secrets, the party that isn’t in power doesn’t and there seems to be nothing to choose between them!

“… Labour voted to call the meeting into secret, evicting the public and the Press, after accusing Cllr Beer (Con) of releasing “commercially sensitive” information about a travellers site being considered in the north of Plymouth.

Council leader Tudor Evans (Lab) told the monitoring officer he wanted to hold the rest of the debate in private, saying he couldn’t be sure the Tories “could be trusted” not to mention privileged information again.

Labour councillors supported the call, upon which Tory councillors walked out en masse.

Tory leader Cllr Ian Bowyer, speaking outside the chamber, said Labour had “completely overreacted”.

It is undemocratic to exclude the public from this debate and they should be ashamed of themselves,” he said.

“We won’t be party to that debate if it is not in public.

“There is no point in debating in secret about things that residents are concerned about.

“They [Labour] have been happy to spend £750,000 on clean-ups since they came to power three years ago, but our argument is that enough is enough and that tax payers have the right for their money to be spent wisely.”

Exactly the argument used against TORY secrecy in East Devon!

Source: http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Conservatives-walk-council-meeting-refusing/story-26218708-detail/story.html

No seat is safe … Whips … Serial Dictatorship …

Rock superstar Brian May declared today that “no vote is wasted, no seat is safe”, as he launched a campaign aimed at encouraging people to vote.

His Common Decency initiative aims to undermine safe parliamentary seats by persuading voters to back “decent” candidates, rather than parties.

“I have a very poor opinion of what this Coalition has done in this country and I think they have turned their back on the public and turned their back on ordinary voters.

“Things like the whip system – I don’t think most people realise their MP is in the House of Commons in the bar while the debate goes on and he then runs in and votes according to what he’s told to do by the whip.

“That is where democracy stops; in my mind, we need to aim for a complete reform of the House of Commons.

“What we have is a serial dictatorship, we do not have a democracy.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Brian-8211-rock-guitarist-anti-badger-cull/story-26223346-detail/story.html

Pickles overturns Pinn Court development and allows its 400 plus houses to go ahead

“430 residential units, local centre comprising retail space of up to 240 m2 and a community centre, care home of up to 60 bedspaces, specialist care home of up to 60 bedspaces and a park and change facility, together with associated areas of open space (formal and informal), cycleways, footpaths and infrastructure, safeguarded vehicular route to Langaton Lane, served off new access from the highway”

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/415116/15-03-20_ML_IR_Pinn_Court_Farm_Devon_2208393.pdf

Hugo Swire responds

Martyn Oates ‏@bbcmartynoates 3m3 minutes ago:

Hugo Swire: “This was an off the cuff dig to raise money for the party. It was not an attack on the Welfare State”.

Didn’t sound like that to us (on less than the salary he pays his wife (£30-35,000) who doesn’t seem to answer the phone in his office when our contacts have rung).

And the joke about expensive cars: not an attack on MPs curtailed expenses that saw him pay hundreds of pounds for an iPad cover when some of us only have that – or less – to pay for a second-hand car? Originally claimed on expenses but later repaid when the purchase hit the headlines.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Swire-claimed-range-camera-laptops-sat-nav/story-11803858-detail/story.html

And the joke about buying Greece for “another £5,000″ for a case of wine: not an attack on the price of wine, perhaps? Bet the Greeks struggling to survive laughed at that one.

Isn’t it odd that Hugo only chooses to attack the poor and defend the rich? Well, maybe not.

The biggest problem here is that we have an MP that says one thing in public and another thing when amongst his rich friends. That is the sort of error of judgment you just don’t want in your MP. Though to be fair, he rarely has time to visit us to make his gaffes.

Shall we see him at a food bank or second- hand car showroom in East Devon to show his solidarity with us – all being ” in it” together?

And what jokes does he tell about his constituency to his rich pals behind those oft-closed doors?

Local press picks up Swire “jokes” with comments from Parliamentary contenders

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/touch-Devon-MP-criticised-benefits-joke/story-26221703-detail/story.html

Claire Wright responds to Hugo Swire’s “jokes”

Hugo Swire, the current MP for Devon East and a junior Foreign Office minister, has shown contempt for those on benefits who are struggling to make ends meet. Exposed by the Channel Four Dispatches programme in a sting, temporary auctioneer Swire, seeking to raise funds for the Conservatives at a black tie dinner for his party in Mayfair in February, managed to insult those on benefits in the UK and those who are suffering hardship in Greece. Seeking a higher bid, he said “£60,000 …Ian..persuade him…he’s not on benefits is he? Well, if he is, then he can afford it..£55,000.”

At the same function last month, which raised some £2 million for his party from some of the wealthiest people in the country, the minister was trying to auction a holiday in Greece. He commented that, for another £1,000, he “would throw in a case of wine and for an extra £5,000 we’ll throw in Greece as well”. Tables at the event could be booked for up to £15,000 each.

This event was staged just the evening before Hugo Swire voted for a cut of 13.4 per cent in the grant for Devon which will cause new hardship in the county as more services are cut. Already, libraries, hospitals, bus routes and many services for children and elderly people have been reduced or eliminated. The latest reduction prompted the Deputy Leader of Devon County Council, a Conservative, to observe “Cameron, like Pickles, is out of touch”.

Mr Swire, through the “buddy” system, is linked to five very large companies but according to Claire Wright, his main challenger in the Devon East constituency, he lacks any understanding of the problems that ordinary people have.

“What is funny about people who face a daily battle trying to survive on benefits? It is not funny for those who struggle to scrape together the funds in an attempt to make ends meet. It is not funny for the many thousands who have to use food banks. Mr Swire obviously lacks understanding and empathy with ordinary people. It shows him in a poor and callous light. This insensitive and tasteless comment comes from a minister in a government that has assured us that ‘we are all in it together’ and they probably still don’t understand why millions of us think that is a bad joke.

“His comments reflect a worrying lack of compassion that characterises this government. Mr Swire should apologise for his crass remarks.”

Council redundancy payoffs for senior staff must be disclosed

Several high profile officers have left East Devon District Council recently. We look forward to details of their payoffs – which it seems are NOT protected by “confidentiality agreements” (gagging clauses) they may or may not have signed:

In a letter earlier this month to Rother’s Leader (Cllr Carl Maynard), Hopkins highlighted a “clear legal requirement” within the Accounts and Audit (England) Regulations 2011 for authorities to publish certain information on senior remuneration in their annual statement of accounts.
He noted that the secondary legislation set out the separate elements of remuneration that must be published for certain senior staff, and that this included any payments made in connection with the termination of employment.

“Such payments cannot be protected from disclosure by confidentiality agreements,” the minister said. “To be absolutely clear, neither the Code of Local Authority Accounting nor past judgements by the Information Commissioner can override these statutory obligations.”

Hopkins also said that the DCLG had, in light of the approach Rother had taken in its annual statement of accounts, taken the opportunity to look at the local authority’s broader approach to transparency.

This had raised further concerns, the minister suggested in the letter, including that the council did not appear to be following best practice on Localism Act pay policy statements.

“Our guidance states that councils should ensure that pay policy statements are easily accessible to the public as stand alone documents, not hidden in committee papers. Your council does not appear to have followed this guidance,” Hopkins said.

The minister said he was also concerned that the information published on Rother’s website on senior salaries did not meet the requirements of the mandatory Local Government Transparency Code 2014.

“Indeed, I note that your council has stated that it intends to achieve compliance with the Code by April 2015,” Hopkins wrote. “Councils’ statutory obligations under the Code are very clear – the first set of quarterly data had to be published by 31 December 2014 and the first set of annual data had to be published by 2 February 2015.

“It appears from your website that your council has not published data in a number of important areas, for example, contracts over £5,000, land and assets, senior salaries, an organisation chart, trade union facility time, parking revenues, grants to the voluntary sector and the like. This is a significant failing.”

Hopkins said that, in light of this, he had decided to withhold Rother’s new burdens funding for 2014-15 in respect of publishing data in 2014-15 under the Code.

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=22297:dclg-to-withhold-funding-from-district-over-transparency-qfailingsq&catid=59&Itemid=27

Tesco news

East Devon is heavily reliant on Tesco stores as they are the most prominent supermarket in most of our towns. News of multi-billion pound law suit against the company by some very hard-hitters is not good:

http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Tesco-shareholders-sue-263m-profit-shock/story-26220943-detail/story.html

Where is current East Devon MP Hugo Swire today?

“On Tuesday 24 March, Rt Hon Hugo Swire MP, Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, will give the keynote speech on a policy summit that will explore recent developments in policy and generate new ideas for the new Parliament to come. Graham Cole, Chair of the independent Cole Commission, will speak along with experts in business support, high tech exporting and the opportunities and realities of the Asian economies.”

source: http://www.reform.uk

Claire Wright’s analysis of housing figures – curious, chilling and mysterious – and not in a good way

The disappearing houses

… And something sinister has happened to all the houses built between 2006 and 2013.

They have disappeared!

Before I get on to this I should explain that in the old draft local plan the plan period was between 2006 and 2026.

The new revisions propose a plan period of 2013 to 2031.

So what has happened to all the houses that were in the old draft local plan between 2006 and 2013?

Have they been erased from the towns and villages that they were built in?

No. They simply have not been counted! This means that the figure of 18,000 is a considerable underestimate. I am not sure how many houses are now unaccounted for but I think we can assume it is several thousand. Which does rather increase the true housing hike up to well over 20,000.

I gave the council quite a blast over all this (as did other councillors including Susie Bond and Ian Thomas and a more than a dozen residents) at this morning’s development management committee meeting, which was packed with around 100 members of the public.

I also asked whether the planning inspector had recommended a housing number for the district. The chief executive indicated that he had not.

Then why I asked, does it say on the press release dated 9 March, that the planning inspector had advised on housing growth of 950 a year? This gives a clear (and totally false) impression that the council was implementing the sort of development levels that the planning inspector had told them to. …”

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/eddc_proposes_highest_housing_levels_possible_for_district

Scorched earth – literally.