Government has no idea how many homes have been built on public land

An influential committee of MPs has strongly criticised the Government for failing to collect information on the actual number of houses built or under construction under its high-profile public sector land disposal programme.

The Department of Communities and Local Government has previously claimed that by the end of March 2015, the Government had disposed of land with capacity for an estimated 109,950 homes, across 942 sites.

The biggest contributors were the Ministry of Defence (around 39,000 homes), the Homes and Communities Agency (around 21,000, on behalf of the DCLG) and the Department of Health (around 15,000).

But in a report, Disposal of public land for new homes, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said the DCLG was unable to demonstrate whether the programme had succeeded in addressing the housing shortage or achieving value for money.

The Department had also not ascertained the proceeds from land sold, or whether the parcels of land were sold at market value, the MPs said.

“Instead, it chose to focus only on a notional number for ‘potential’ capacity for building houses on the land sold by individual departments in order to determine ‘success’,” the PAC said.

The committee noted that the DCLG had also counted towards the programme’s target the capacity of land sold before the programme had even started.

“It did not collect basic information necessary to oversee the programme effectively and, where it did collect programme-level data, there were omissions and inconsistencies, the report said.

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24529:mps-blast-lack-of-information-on-public-sector-land-disposal-programme&catid=58&Itemid=26

A different (Labour) way of financing social housing?

Under the plans, contained in a report produced for a think-tank, the new homes could pay for themselves within a generation through savings to housing benefit.

The report said the housing benefit bill has grown quicker under the Conservatives than under Labour administrations.

On current trends, the housing benefit bill is set to hit £45 billion in today’s prices by 2045, more than the UK currently spends on defence, the report said.

The report said the programme of affordable public homes to buy and rent could pay for itself in 26 years purely through lower housing benefit payments, returning a “profit” to the Exchequer of £5.8 billion over 30 years.

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Labour-plan-build-100-000-affordable-homes-year/story-27881403-detail/story.html

“Corruption is rife in the EU” – and in our own back yard

Following the jailing of a corrupt Exeter City Council housing section employee for a scam that netted him nearly half a million pounds:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Senior-Exeter-council-boss-masterminded/story-27868580-detail/story.html

here is a report on how this takes place all over Europe – is enough being done to ensure this is not happening even close than Exeter City Council?:

“By Dean Carroll

Citizen trust in governments and public bodies is desperately low because relationships between politicians and business leaders “take place in the dark”, according to campaign group Transparency International. Reacting to the European Commission’s first ever continent-wide anti-corruption report, which had identified serious shortcomings in the efforts of European Union member states, TI suggested that “no country gets a clean bill of health”.

Deputy managing director of Transparency International Miklos Marschall said: “Trust in Europe’s leaders is falling because relations between business and the public sector take place in the dark, leaving citizens with questions about whose interests are being taken care of. To bridge the gap between politics and people, there must be greater transparency in public life and more public officials held to account for their actions.”

Cross-border corruption was highlighted as a threat to the single market in the report assessing all 28 EU member states. It was estimated that corruption was costing the public purse at least €120bn a year. The document was first scheduled for publication in June of last year but has since been hit by one delay after another. It paints a bleak picture of public sector administration with potential conflicts of interest leading to possible systemic skullduggery in areas including the awarding of public contracts, bribery, parliamentary ethics and political party financing.

“We welcome this report as an important step in the EU’s collective effort to scale up its anti-corruption efforts,” said Marschall. “It is a stark warning against complacency about corruption in any EU country.”

In 2013, France, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Spain all experienced well-documented cases of high-level criminal allegations ranging from fraud and money-laundering to abuses of party finances. Sweden, however, was celebrated as the best performer in the report. But European Commisisoner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmström admitted: “Corruption is a phenomenon which is difficult to tackle. At the same time, it is a problem we cannot afford to ignore. One in 12 Europeans has experienced or witnessed corruption in the last 12 months and four out of 10 European companies consider corruption to be an obstacle for doing business within the EU.

“The level of corruption varies from one member state to another. But the report also shows that corruption affects all EU member states. One thing is very clear: there is no corruption-free zone in Europe. We hope that the process we are starting today will spur the political will and the necessary commitment at all levels to address corruption more effectively across Europe. The price of not acting is simply too high.”

In Croatia, the Czech Republic, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania and Greece between 6 per cent and 29 per cent of respondents surveyed by the commission said they had been asked for a bribe in the last 12 months. A large volume of bribes also occurred in Poland, Slovakia and Hungary – according to the official statistics.

Despite the discovery that maladministration was rife, the EU’s anti-fraud agency OLAF retained an annual budget of just €23.5m. Europol has estimated that 3,000 organised crime groups also have tentacles spreading across a number of areas – possibly even within public authorities. The BBC reported that Bulgaria, Romania and Italy were “particular hotspots for organised crime gangs in the EU but white-collar crimes like bribery and value added tax fraud plague many EU countries”.

http://www.policyreview.eu/corruption-blights-public-life-across-the-entire-eu/

Sidbury homes plan?

Is a development that immediately increases a village’s population by 10% too big? Most think so:

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/40_homes_plan_too_big_for_sidbury_1_4246567