Straitgate Quarry: DCC votes to allow it progress despite major drawbacks

” … Disappointment was expressed this week after Devon County Council’s (DCC) development management committee (DMC) voted to keep the site in its minerals plan – which earmarks land suitable for future aggregate supplies.

Speaking at the DMC meeting on Wednesday, Councillor Claire Wright argued the inclusion of Straitgate in the plan makes it undeliverable. She implored members to consider deferring the matter.

Cllr Wright said that opposition from one land owner who controls access makes the site undeliverable, as does the lack of a viable processing place. AI’s proposals rely on it processing material at Blackhill Quarry in Woodbury – land that has not been approved for inclusion in the plan. Cllr Wright also argued AI’s estimated 1.2million tonnes of material could only be achieved by quarrying down to the water table – which would have a detrimental impact on the important environmental area, affect water supplies and also pose a flood risk. She added: “I also want to point out the level of opposition in Ottery. Over the last four years, there have been hundreds of objections.”

DCC officer Andy Hill said: “It is correct that the planning application has thrown up certain constraints. We feel there is an expectation that the site is deliverable in some form.”

On the amount of material, he said: “A definitive figure is not available but, if it’s less than expected, it is not fatal to the plan.”

Cllr Robert Vint suggested it is premature to go ahead with the plan in light of the points raised.

However, members agreed that a planning inspector will consider all of the points raised during the examination process and voted for the plan to be submitted to the next stage.

Monica Mortimer, of the Straitgate Action campaign group, said: “We will keep fighting. We are grateful to Claire for sticking up for the people of Ottery. The officers are only hearing one side of the story and they refuse to consider other points.”

Applications for the quarry at Straitgate Farm and a processing site at Blackhill are both yet to be decided by DCC.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/vow_to_keep_fighting_100_acre_quarry_proposals_on_ottery_s_outskirts_1_4406014

Devolution: Trust Diviani says Moulding

“Deputy leader Cllr Andrew Moulding added: “I think we have to trust our leader, supported by the chief executive, to work in our interest to get the best possible negotiated deal we can for devolution and localism in our area.”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/devolution_deal_moves_closer_despite_concern_1_4406297

Well, that’s us sorted then …

And which councillor has most power and influence to gain from the devolution deal? Councillor Diviani, who is currently slated to be responsible for housing expenditure in the whole of Devon and Somerset – along with his old pal Exeter CEO Karim Hassan (ex-EDDC).

Happy days.

Greenwich insists that all developers publish their (non) affordable housing data

All planning applications in Greenwich must now include full details and cost calculations of calculations relating to affordable housing (or lack of it) in their initial planning applications.

http://www.publicsectorexecutive.com/Public-Sector-News/council-bans-developers-from-keeping-their-affordable-housing-viability-studies-confidential?utm_source=Public%20Sector%20Executive&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=6740360_PSE%20Bulletin%20Feb%2016%20wk%201&dm_i=IJU,40GW8,KSFJZ3,EI3XE,1

Devolution and public consultation: talk is cheap

” … MPs, who held a public evidence session in Greater Manchester as part of their inquiry, also said many people had complained about a lack of consultation.

“The vast majority of contributions, often made in angry tones, arose from the perceived lack of efforts by the combined authority to engage the public about the deal relating to their local area,” the committee said.

“For devolution to take root and fulfil its aims, it needs to involve and engage the people it is designed to benefit. There has been a consistent very significant lack of public consultation, engagement and communication at all stages of the deal-making process.”

Council leaders from other parts of the country told the committee the public had not been consulted before their deals were agreed.

‘Rapid pace’

It is particularly important to engage the public where health powers are being devolved, the MPs said, because “the public’s response is likely to be more emotional”.

The committee said the government had driven the first wave of devolution deals through “at rapid pace”, which meant “no opportunity for engagement with residents”, but said council leaders should still have communicated the deal to residents and told them how they would be affected.

The Department for Communities and Local Government said it welcomed the committee’s support for its “devolution revolution” and said there was “no one-size-fits-all approach” for different areas.

Local Government Association chairman Lord Porter said: “While it is right that devolution deals are not imposed, but negotiated and secured by local places, we recognise the need for greater public engagement throughout the deal-making process and are working with councils to support them in this.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35479059

A Devon MP is too busy opening law offices in Dubai and Mumbai to remember to declare £400,000 of income

A former member of the House of Commons Standards Board, he will only have to apologise. And how the heck does he have time to be an MP. Let’s hope the people of Torridge learn in time for the next election.


“A Conservative MP who failed to declare more than £400,000 of outside earnings will only have to apologise to the Commons after Parliament’s Standards Committee decided not to formally punish him for the breach.

In a judgement that will increase criticism over the body, Geoffrey Cox QC will be asked to make an apology, but no formal action will be taken.
The Standards Committee found that Geoffrey Cox QC had committed a “serious” breach of rules, although it accepted he had not “intended to hide” the payments for hundreds of hours of legal work. …

… Earlier in 2015 it emerged that Cox declared earnings of £820,000 from outside work and second jobs — 12 times the annual MP wage.
According to the latest register of members’ financial interests, Mr Cox received £325,000 on June 15 and 16 this year for 500 hours of work carried out between June 2014 and March 2015.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/conservative-mps-expenses/12140118/Tory-MP-Geoffrey-Cox-will-only-have-to-apologise-after-failing-to-declare-hundreds-of-thousands-of-pounds.html

What happens when you contract-out education to profit-led academies

Inspectors say that almost half of pupils at secondary schools run by the Academies Enterprise Trust (AET) are in schools that are “less than good”. Ofsted warns that poorer pupils do “particularly badly” in AET schools.

In response the trust said it was disappointed that its “significant achievements” had “not been sufficiently recognised”.

The Department for Education is threatening that unless standards are raised there will be “further action”.

AET runs 67 academies across England. Such academy chains are independent but publicly funded to run schools. AET has charitable status and a financial report up to August 2014 said there was annual expenditure of £333m.
‘Mediocre’

Inspectors say that 40% of pupils in primary schools run by AET are in “academies that do not provide a good standard of education”. “It is even worse in secondary, where 47% of pupils attend academies that are less than good,” says Ofsted.
The performance of AET’s secondary schools is described as “mediocre” and there has been a lack of progress since Ofsted highlighted weaknesses in the chain’s schools two years ago.

The report says there is a particular weakness in the progress of disadvantaged pupils.

Inspectors also warned about “unacceptably low” attendance levels.

And there was criticism of “insufficient detail” about how the trust is governed. …

Ofsted cannot give a judgement on an academy chain, but inspectors can carry out multiple inspections of individual schools it runs.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-35492433

Current cost of new EDDC HQ at Honiton/Exmouth – nearly £10m and all meetings assuming Pegasus gets its planning permission are already scheduled

Relocation cost so far:

£9,726,455

Click to access 6-project-report-20-300915.pdf

page 5

Further on in the report:

The project has
7 “red risks”
32 “orange risks” and
8 “blue risks”

They already have a pretty good idea of when the planning meeting for Pegasus will be and have scheduled it

12 July 2016 (page 12)

and have already fixed an Extraordinary Cabinet Meeting
on 27 July 2016
and a similar Full Council meeting for
3 August 2016
with works in Exmouth to start on 4 August 2016.

Of course, all these meetings take place in the major summer holiday period.

Relocation to Exmouth Town Hall will take place on
20 June 2017
and full relocation to both sites will be achieved by
25 September 2017.

Thereafter the report consists of various cost breakdowns.

It appears that, for some reason, Appendix C is missing