David Cameron’s mum fights Tory austerity cuts

“The Prime Minister’s mum Mary has signed a petition aimed at stopping Tory cuts.

Jill Huish, who runs the campaign that Mary backed, said: “It shows how deep austerity is cutting our most vulnerable when even David Cameron ’s mum has had enough.”

Mary, 81, signed a petition railing against Conservative cuts to “essential services”.

She put her name to the battle to save dozens of children’s centres that a Tory-run council is poised to close to save £8million.

Local authorities in England have had their government funding slashed by 40% since Mr Cameron entered Downing Street in 2010.””

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-camerons-mum-joins-fight-7334739

An unfortunate lapse of memory? And yet another instance of Councillors Hughes and Troman not following through

One reason that the Local Plan Inspector kept the Sidford Business park in the Local Plan was that he deemed the Alexandria Industrial Estate “not suitable”.

Although we are told that he did visit the site, he plainly put much emphasis on the very out-of-date evidence about it in the Employment Land Review 2014 sent by EDDC as evidence.

But at a full council meeting on 25 July 2012 it was “resolved” to undertake an exploration into the capacity for the expansion of the Alexandria Industrial Estate.

Our correspondent asked the council where the outcome of this exploration ordered by full council could be found:

Today, our correspondent received a reply:

“With regard to the exploration into the capacity for the expansion of the Alexandria Industrial Estate, I have found the recommendation in the Council Committee minutes dated 25th July 2012. Having spoken to the Planning Team there appears to be no information held on the outcome of this proposal.”

Well there’s a surprise! A full council meeting (not a Council Committee meeting as cited in the reply!) resolves to investigate better usage of Alexandria industrial Estate …. and nothing happens!

Here is the minute and resolution from that meeting:

Minutes of Cabinet and Committees Arising from consideration of the minutes:-

Planning Policy – New East Devon Local Plan 2006 – 2026
Special Meeting of Development Management Committee (Minute 11) Proposed amendments (continued)

The amendment was seconded by Councillor Graham Troman who emphasised the need for an audit trail of decision making in respect of the Plan. He was concerned about some misinterpretation of what the towns had said in consultation.

Sidmouth Ward Members, Councillors Christine Drew and Stuart Hughes would welcome an opportunity to raise their concerns about the proposed allocation of employment land at Sidford and its potential impact.

Discussion included concern over the Local Plan process. Members were again reminded that there would be a further period of 6 weeks for consultation.

The proposal to hold an Extraordinary Council meeting to discuss the full Local Plan without delaying the Local Plan process was put to the vote and lost.

Councillor Hughes proposed that the capacity for expansion of the Alexandria Industrial Estate should be explored.

This amendment was seconded by Councillor Wale. The proposal was put to the vote and carried.

RESOLVED that the capacity for expansion of the Alexandria Industrial Estate be explored.”

Click to access council-mins-250712.pdf

Exmouth: Queen’s Drive closed due to strong winds – and sand!

Can you imagine those coming second-home/holiday let potential owners getting hot-under-the-collar at not being able to reach their new, expensive homes – or being trapped in them.

Some great photos here:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Exmouth-8217-s-Queens-Drive-closed-strong-winds/story-28693407-detail/story.html

and video here:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/05/storms-exmouth-coast-video

Fettering of Information Act: why Labour ex-Cabinet Minister is Chairman

“Jack Straw’s ministries amongworst on freedom of information requests
Straw now sits on panel set up to review FoI act and expected to propose making some information harder to access

The former cabinet minister Jack Straw, who has been tasked with considering how to tighten up the Freedom of Information Act, led two of the Whitehall departments most likely to reject public requests for information.

Straw’s ministries never ranked higher than 15 out of 21 government departments in terms of releasing information in full, according to a Guardian analysis of government-wide figures.

In 2010, his final year as lord chancellor, the Ministry of Justice was the worst ranked government department, providing none of the information requested more often than any other ministry.

In the six years he was a secretary of state under the act, his departments ranked 16th, 17th, 15th, 20th, 21st and 21st out of between 21 and 23 ministries. Straw was foreign secretary until 2006, and then justice secretary until 2010.

… Straw now sits on an independent five-person panel set up to review FoI legislation. The panel is expected later this month to propose making some information harder to access for members of the public, journalists and campaigners. …

Last month it emerged that before he stood down as an MP last May, Straw had given a corporation for which he was working as a £60,000-a-year paid adviser guidance on how to block the release of documents from the Foreign Office by citing an FoI exemption that allows information affecting commercial interests to be withheld.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/feb/08/jack-straw-ministries-among-worst-freedom-of-information

Just the man for the job!

When and how does £265,000 of savings become £400,000 of savings?

What does one make of this, on the agenda of the Joint Overview and Scrutiny meeting to be held on Tuesday 9 February 2016 at 6 pm from the agenda papers and talking of the potential savings to be made on a new refuse and recycling contract:

“The recommended Lot being proposed in the report does give a saving to the Council in the order of £0.265m along with providing an enhanced recycling service. The draft budget however assumed a saving of £0.400m in line with our Transformation Strategy thereby giving us a shortfall of £0.135m in our budget proposals should members wish to adopt the recommended option. This issue is dealt with the Revenue and Capital Estimates Report 2016/17 contained on this agenda on the assumption that members adopt
the recommendation”

Click to access 090216-joint-overview-and-scrutiny-agenda-combined-public.pdf

It seems to say: This contract will save us £265,000 but the draft budget assumed that it would save us £400,000 and we have found a way to make it come to £400,000 …. by some sort of wizardly accounting?

How many committee members will take the time and trouble to look at the Revenue and Capital Estimates Report 2016/17 to see exactly how this wonderful accounting is dealt with and reassure themselves that 265 really does mean 400?

Sidmouth (non?) Conservative Club, a tax protest and Swire’s take on it all

The photograph below is taken at Independent Councillor Claire Wright’s demonstration on fat cat tax avoidance outside (on the public pavement) the Sidmouth Conservative Club, which until recently had a rather scruffy and spider-infested pic of Hugo Swire on its notice board.

image

Apparently, a person from the club insisted that it is “non political” though it appears in a list of Conservative member clubs

http://www.toryclubs.co.uk/page/website-linkup

and was keen to persuade the protesters to move away from the vicinity of the club when they protested last week.

For Mr Swire’s views on tax evasion and avoidance (which he appears to confuse) see here:

http://www.hugoswire.org.uk/news/blog-tax-evasion-and-avoidance

where he states:

” … Even though companies may avoid paying tax on their profits, they do contribute to the public purse in other ways. Their employees will pay Income Tax and National Insurance, as well as any additional taxes they may occur. In the UK – when you add up VAT, business rates, national insurance contributions, and so on – about 30% of tax revenues come from businesses, of which only eight per cent comes from corporation tax. …”

So, that’s ok then. As long as WE pay our 20-40 % taxes and pay 20% VAT when we spend what’s left, the mega-companies that employ us (which should pay 20% corporation tax) can happily 3-4% max! If we tried that we would be given hefty fines or prison sentences!

Reminds Owl of tales of the old British Empire where, in Africa, people got paid by mine companies – and could only spend the money in mine company owned shops!

Beach hut site increased rents = £521,631 per acre per year!

On a Facebook site, a Seaton beach hut renter has plotted a graph of price increases against cost-of-living increases. Here is a comment on that post:

“£574.80 per year for 48 sq ft [of beach pebbles] = £521,631 per year per acre. To put this in context, the price for an acre of prime agricultural land is c. £5,000-£6,000, so the price for wasteland would be substantially lower and for pebbled beach lower still. So for what EDDC are charging in rent for wasteland, you can buy 100 times that area and keep it forever.

I would presume that EDDC’s justification is “market rates”, and so long as people keep paying these exorbitant amounts, then they can quite reasonably claim that these are “market rates”.

The real answer is that the council leadership, prompted by their pals in government, see themselves more as a capitalistic organisation that needs to be market driven and take local residents for every penny they can rather than a body elected by local residents to serve local residents to provide public services for their benefit.

The only ways I can see to get EDDC to change will be to:

a) Vote with your feet on Beach Huts – stop renting and show the council that their rates are much higher than the market will support; and

b) Use your vote at the next county and district local government elections to elect councillors who see their role as benefiting local residents rather than supporting central government policy.”

The hunt for Queen’s Drive Exmouth!

Twitter awash with reports that Queen’s Drive, Exmouth has disappeared under a mass of beach sand …. it has even made The Guardian
#stormimogen

If you develop there, remember this and that global warming will only make it worse ….

Head of two adult care boards in Devon quits over “relentless cuts”

“The head of two adult safeguarding organisations has resigned, saying government cuts could lead to “a serious incident or death”.

The BBC has learnt Bob Spencer had “serious concerns” about the ability of both Torbay and Devon Safeguarding Adults Boards to deliver services in the face of “relentless budget cuts”.

He became chairman of the Torbay board in 2009, and the Devon board in 2013.
The government said it had provided councils with £3.5bn for social care.
In his resignation letter, Mr Spencer said he had seen how vulnerable people were “hardest hit” by the cuts to these agencies, and “with another four years of cuts, Devon and Torbay will struggle to provide a safe service”.
“We will, I fear, be facing a situation when services are reduced so significantly that those most vulnerable are at risk of abuse on many levels.

“Ultimately neglect, poor care and criminal actions may lead to a serious incident or death,” he said.

Safeguarding boards are statutory organisations which bring together councils, the NHS, and police, to oversee protection for vulnerable people, such as those who have learning disabilities or the elderly.

Mr Spencer said his decision to run as an independent candidate in the next election for the crime commissioner for Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly acknowledged the “tireless” work done by staff and volunteers in the partnership safeguarding agencies.

The Department for Communities and Local Government said councils in England would have “almost £200bn to spend on local services” during this parliament, which it said was a reduction of “just 1.7%” annually in real terms.

A spokesperson for the department said: “By the end of this parliament local councils will be financed from local revenue, such as council tax and business rates rather than central government grant, which is something local government has spent decades campaigning for.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-35513316

Interesting to have an independent stand for police commissioner and one who has been at the sharp end of austerity cuts.

One to watch.