Google and our Government – a cosy relationship

“New concerns have been raised about the political influence of Google after research found at least 80 “revolving door” moves in the past decade – instances where the online giant took on government employees and European governments employed Google staff.

The research was carried out by the Google Transparency Project, an initiative run by the Campaign for Accountability (CfA), a US organisation that scrutinises corporations and politicians. The CfA has suggested that the moves are a result of Google seeking to boost its influence in Europe as the company seeks to head off antitrust action and moves to tighten up on online privacy.

In the UK, Google has hired people from Downing Street, the Home Office, the Treasury, the Department for Education and the Department for Transport. Overall, the company has hired at least 28 British public officials since 2005.

Those hired have included Sarah Hunter, a senior policy adviser to Tony Blair when prime minister, who became head of public policy for Google in the UK. Hunter is now head of policy for Google X, the arm that deals with new businesses such as drones and self-driving cars.

In 2013 Google hired Verity Harding, a special adviser to former deputy prime minister Nick Clegg. Harding is now policy manager for Google DeepMind, its artificial intelligence arm, which recently secured a contract with the NHS.

Overall, the research suggests that Google, now part of parent company Alphabet Inc, has hired at least 65 former government officials from within the European Union since 2005. These include Tomas Gulbinas, a former ambassador-at-large for the Lithuanian government, and Georgios Mavros, a former adviser to a French member of the European parliament: both became Google lobbyists.

During the same period, 15 Google employees were appointed to government positions in Europe, gaining what the CfA claims are “valuable contacts at the heart of the decision-making process”.

In the UK, appointments include that of Baroness Joanna Shields, a former managing director for Google, who was made minister for internet safety, and Google’s executive chairman, Eric Schmidt, who David Cameron appointed to his business advisory council. Dame Margaret Hodge, former head of the Commons’ public accounts committee, told the CfA that the appointments were part of a deliberate strategy by Google to gain influence in the public sphere. “I have absolutely no doubt it’s part of their strategy,” Hodge said. “Google deliberately nurtures that culture, and I have absolutely no doubt that they see it as strategically important to be as close as they can to government.”

She added that, unlike other large American companies, such as Apple, “one gets the impression that [government] ministers are in awe of Google”. …

… In the UK, Google has been moving into a raft of new areas now being heavily promoted by the government. “We need to rethink how we view Google,” said Tamasin Cave of the campaign group Spinwatch. “It’s not a search engine, it’s a political beast that has captured the attention of our policy-makers. Most worryingly in health and education, where privatisation through technology is gathering pace. Even if our politicians have bought into its thinking, we as a public should be asking how Google’s involvement in the NHS and schools will impact them, what are the consequences, and who benefits: us or Google?””

http://gu.com/p/4k9je

Wonder if any of our LEP members have Google associations!

Quote of the day

Unhappy events … have retaught us two simple truths about the liberty of a democratic people.

The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it comes stronger than their democratic state itself.

That, in its essence, is fascism – ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any other controlling private power….

Among us today a concentration of private power without equal in history is growing.

The second truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if its business system does not provide employment and produce and distribute goods in such a way as to sustain an acceptable standard of living [for everyone].

Both lessons hit home.

Among us today a concentration of private power without equal in history is growing.” “

Franklin D Roosevelt, message to the US Congress 1938

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=15637

The rest of the article scarily foreshadows the exact same events today.

Quart into pint pot at new EDDC offices?

Owl see that the designs for the new offices at Honiton have been published in an EDDC agenda and wonders why there is no scale with the drawings.

Maybe the building may have been increased in size for two reasons: staff were apparently shocked at the lack of space and complained, plus the numbers of staff have increased a lot recently.

And Owl further sees they are taking money from the transformation fund, so the cost is rising further still …

Click to access 060416-combined-cabinet-agendasm.pdf

Old people are a “tension” for devolution – and so is happiness!

From a slide on a devolution workshop:

Tensions

Local and national government perspectives eg business rates reform and what must central government continue to lead

Small family businesses and ambition (lifestyle businesses) and do they have a role in transformation?

Productivity at what cost – not sacrificing the environment

Backing the ‘winners’ v spreading the jam

Other measures – e.g. happiness

Dealing with retirees

Click to access 060416-combined-cabinet-agendasm.pdf

page 91

Knowle relocation: cost now approaching £10 million

Page 32 onwards.

Click to access 060416-combined-cabinet-agendasm.pdf

Greens and Independents learn from each other

Good to see EDDC Independents Leader Ben Ingham talking today at the Green Party South-West conference on the Local Enterprise Partnership devolution fiasco and at a workshop about Green and Independent co-operation.

This is the way politics should and will go.