Claire Wright responds to Hugo Swire’s rant about independents and the “Ottery Pack”

From Claire Wright’s Facebook Page

It was fortunate for Mr Swire that I was in the process of moving house and without internet for two weeks which meant I couldn’t respond fully to his blog posts that I fundamentally take issue with, relating mainly to Ottery St Mary Hospital and his government’s property management company, which is set to acquire 12 community hospitals in Eastern Devon, later this year.

Fortunately, I now have a full internet connection and below is my reaction.

Mr Swire seems angry that around 250 people came along to my demonstration at Ottery Hospital last month and didn’t believe his claims that the Secretary of State’s for Health’s new private company – NHS Property Services is entirely well meaning and benign.

Residents present were sceptical of his assertions that the company is only acquiring community hospitals (currently owned by local NHS organisations) and charging high market rents, in order to help maintain the buildings.

I held the demonstration on 21 May, as I am outraged by the news that NHS Property Services is to help itself to Ottery Hospital and 11 others in Eastern Devon. NHS PS has a remit for selling off hospital buildings that are “surplus to requirements.”

Mr Swire unexpectedly turned up at the protest, which he is quite entitled to do and asked to address the crowd after me, which I readily agreed to.

His response (which received heckling and jeering from the crowd) largely related to claiming that Ottery Hospital is entirely safe and that NHS PS wouldn’t and couldn’t sell it off.

My question, which I have asked repeatedly of NHS PS and of Mr Swire – what happens if the local NHS (which is around £80m in debt) can’t pay the rent, still remains unanswered.

My request to NHS PS, which has offered me similar assurances to Mr Swire, to view the draft terms and conditions of the contract, so I can satisfy myself that Ottery Hospital’s building is safe, has been refused.

I am reliably informed that elsewhere in the country community hospital buildings acquired by NHS PS have remained shut, with health clinics having to be held in church halls because of unaffordable rents, totalling around £500,000 a year. Before being seized by NHS PS, local health trusts owned the buildings so no rent was payable.

In Ottery’s case local people raised around £250,000 just 20 years ago to assist with the new hospital building.

Yet Mr Swire has suggested that the community should take out a long term lease in order to protect the hospital – from his own government?

The fact that the responsibility for maintaining community hospital buildings is now shifting from the local NHS to a politically appointed government minister, is also very relevant and has worrying implications.
So that’s the background. What has Mr Swire asserted since?

Well, firstly, he has accused me of “scaremongering” and “weaponising” the issue for my “own political advancement.”

I will not lower myself to respond to these silly comments.

He then goes onto claim that Budleigh Salterton is a good example of a community hospital turned into a health hub … but omits to mention that Budleigh Salterton Hospital remains shut because of ownership issues wrangling related to NHS PS taking over the hospital later this year and charging unaffordable rents!

Our MP’s derisory response to the problem doesn’t end here. Mr Swire has even insulted all the protesters at my demonstration on 21 May. He announced in his column in the East Devon press two weeks ago, also reproduced on his blog, that the residents who attended were a “left leaning pack that follow Councillor Claire Wright.”

Ottery St Mary Town Council is so angry about this remark that it will write to Mr Swire to complain.

I intend to fight the very dubious intentions of NHS PS all the way. This is just the beginning.

NHS Property Services is on the agenda at Devon County Council’s health and wellbeing scrutiny committee (of which I am a member) on Monday 20 June at 2pm. Please come along to County Hall and observe or watch online via the council’s website if you would like to know more. If you wish to address the committee you will need to register asap.

Some constituencies have MPs who fight their corner. It is a shame that East Devon’s MP is only interested in defending the indefensible actions of his government, which appears to be on a mission to degrade the NHS further each year.

Auditors KPMG (EDDC new external auditor) resigns as FIFA auditor

KPMG recently replaced Grant Thornton as external auditor to East Devon District Council.

“Fifa has welcomed the decision by its financial auditor KPMG to resign. The break in a decade-long relationship was announced Monday, months after KPMG said it would review its work with football’s scandal-hit world governing body.

In a statement, Fifa said it “welcomes this change as it gives the organisation the opportunity to work with a new audit firm.” It also noted “serious allegations involving financial transactions outlined by the Swiss and US authorities” who are investigating corruption implicating top football officials worldwide.

In a wide-ranging reform of its management structure, Fifa is looking to appoint an auditor plus finance and compliance officers. Fifa fired its finance director Markus Kattner last month after 13 years’ service over irregular bonus payments, worth millions of dollars.”

http://gu.com/p/4yx7f

Campaign for Free [Independent] Parliament response to Hugo Swire

Dear Mr Swire,
Many thanks for devoting space on your website to the subject of independent candidates. You mount a stout defence of the party system and many of the points you raise, single issue candidates, rejects from other parties, lack of policies and so forth are valid.

However as you might expect, before committing over six million pounds to this project, on a one way ticket, we
thought long and hard about these factors and how to mitigate them.

Our guiding principle is that all policies and major decisions should be made in Parliament by the best people that can be found.

As you know, politics is in a state of flux throughout the Western world with extreme parties and extreme politicians emerging. From Golden Dawn in Greece, Alternative für Deutschland in Germany and Donald Trump in America
the writing is on the wall for the establishment.

Electorates are now looking for an alternative to parties that have long marginalised them and treated them with contempt.

However, the future lies not with new parties;
tribal politics has been tested to destruction. The future will be politicians hand-picked for their ability and accountable only to their constituents.

These people will become accomplished politicians who will
work collegiately with their colleagues towards the best possible decisions.

The end result will be policies arrived at by consensus in a powerful yet democratic parliament, rather than being used as electoral bait on the doorstep.

As you point out, independents are often regarded as political misfits or as being obsessed by single issues. However, all the candidates we endorse will have at least three things in common. They will all have signed up to
the Bell Principles, which set out clear standards of conduct; they will support parliamentary reform to stop politicians accepting promotion in return for unquestioning support; and they will have agreed to recall by their constituents if they fail to perform.

Future reforms may include the replacement of general elections, which have become time-wasting, immoral
and unaffordable festivals of bribery, with a permanent parliament. Rather than holding a general election every five years to change from one self-serving party to the next, it would make more sense to hold MPs accountable by recall instead.

The parliamentary term would become a
settled and productive continuum marked only by the periodic check and refreshment of its Members.

By habitually bribing voters to gain power, political parties have caused Western countries to live far beyond their means. Not only do political parties routinely bribe the electorate with their own money, they are now
bribing us with our children’s money as well.

We are imposing a truly immoral burden on future generations and every baby born in the UK today is already £24,000 in debt. Given the parlous state of our economy, by the time
they are sixteen this debt could have more than doubled.

Those who find work will face punitive levels of taxation; those who cannot will suffer an ever-decreasing level of support and opportunity. It has been known for
parents to cut up an offspring’s credit card, one day our children may well wish that they could have cut up ours. The prospect of a happy ending is fading fast as paper currencies, government bonds and quantitative easing
lose their charm in lockstep with stocks and commodities which are now also crumpling under the pressure.

With a clean sheet of paper, no sane person would replicate our present political system. Less than one percent of the electorate is now a member of a political party and seventy-six percent of that same electorate have not voted for the present government.

However, the system will not cure itself; the electorate will have to force reform by voting only for people
with a record of achievement rather than skilful orators. Staffed by MPs chosen for their ability rather than their political affiliation, parliament will have the views, needs and aspirations of the electorate woven into its
fabric rather than being cynically exploited for votes.

The political parties are now trapped by the very system they created and are condemned to keep on promising the earth to cling on to power. It is now up to the electorate to break this destructive cycle by voting only for people we
trust and respect.

You mention that most people are not political obsessives and may find it difficult to stay the distance. We would say that many have become fatalistic about their inability to control their own circumstances, institutionalised, confused by bureaucracy and demotivated by a system that only gives them a restricted choice of options to vote for once every five years.

You also correctly refer to the independents lack of resources in comparison to the big parties. Whilst this is true, crowdfunding will change that dynamic, not only in financial terms but by giving people a stake in their chosen candidate.

It has to be said that the ‘resources’ of the big parties have often been provided in exchange for influence and favours.

You mention that we have a position on the EU, we have and it is on our website;

“Brexit and Remain are both right in what they say. Brexit is correct about the inability to control our borders, red tape and the restriction on global trading by the EU.

Conversely, Remain is right to point out that there would
be damage to trade and that our ability to stand up to major players such as Russia and China would be weakened.

This tells us that the referendum will solve nothing.

However, no middle way is on offer and we are stuck with a
blunt Yes or No choice, neither of which will be in our best interests. The EU has made many mistakes but it has also got some things right and must be reformed rather than blown asunder.

However, it will take a concentrated
effort by all its member states to bring about the changes that will be required.”

The Free Parliament campaign is a philanthropic effort to replace a political system that is well past its sell-by date with one that is designed to work for us rather than against us.

We are now getting serious approaches from all round the UK not just from the West Country. I hope that this goes some way to assuage your concerns and there is also an
extensive FAQ section that you may find of interest.

However, I would be delighted to answer any further questions you may have.
Yours sincerely
Martyn Greene
Campaign Director.

Tourism Minister on visit gets name of Seaton Jurassic wrong!

Heritage and Tourism Minister David Evennett was in Seaton on Friday to see East Devon’s newest tourist attraction – its Jurassic’s wildlife garden. [Note: No mention here of “Seaton JURRASIC” of which the garden is a part]

While the resort’s main £4 million visitor centre [again no name] was formally opened in April by The Princess Royal, its outdoor interpretation areas were delayed by the exceptionally wet weather in the winter and early spring.

As part of his visit, Mr Evennett was also given a tour of Seaton beach to see the UNESCO World Heritage site where he heard how the area is being managed and protected.

He was then shown around the Beer Quarry Caves and discussed the future plans for the site.

Mr Evenett said: “The Jurassic Coast is one of the world’s most important landscapes and one of our country’s natural gems.

“It is wonderful to see how well this unique coastline is being looked after so that it continues to attract vital tourism to the region, while ensuring it is protected for generations to come.

“Seaton Centre [JURASSIC! wrong name again] is a fantastic example of a tourist attraction that is fun but educational too.”

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/heritage_and_tourism_minister_visits_seaton_and_beer_1_4573843

Anyone wanting to find Seaton JURASSIC on Tripadvisor from this press release will need some lateral thinking.

Obviously put together by a press officer in London who probably has no idea where Seaton is!

Another devolution difficulty part 2

See also post directly below this one:

“The [Parliamentary] Committee also said councils need reassurances that they will not be required to take on new responsibilities that are or will become unaffordable. The report lists principles by which decisions on new responsibilities should be based, such as giving local government genuine discretion over how services are provided.

The Committee also calls for:

a review into whether Local Enterprise Partnerships should play such a key role in deciding whether to raise the infrastructure premium, following concerns that some are not representative of all business

consideration of whether, by making the infrastructure premium available only to those areas with a directly-elected mayor, it is placing areas without such a post at a disadvantage, in conflict with the aims of the new scheme

Cart … horses ..stable doors …

Another devolution difficulty … Part 1

See also post directly above this one – what a mess.

Councils are said to be getting 100% of business rates in 2020 ( though our Local Enterprise Partnership will gobble up all those due in Enterprise Zones such as the Exeter and East Devon Growth Point).

Looks like that may be 100% of very little … or nothing.

“[A government]Committee found the impact of appeals by ratepayers is dwarfing increases in business rates revenue and affecting growth incentives, with local authorities setting aside substantial sums of money, often for long periods of time, in case an appeal is successful.

The interim report – focusing on plans to bring in the reformed scheme in 2020 – also states that without RSG [Rates Support Grant] it will prove difficult to provide a system which gives incentives to growth and looks after those authorities with particular need.

It calls on the Government to specify how it will protect councils which rely on redistributed business rates and are worried that they will lose out under the new system.

The Committee hopes the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) will consider the report ahead of its consultation on business rates proposals this summer. Once this is complete, the Committee will invite DCLG Ministers to give evidence before making a final report.”

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/communities-and-local-government-committee/news-parliament-2015/business-rates-report-published-16-17/

Cranbrook ” consultation”

“People who live and work in and around Cranbrook are to have their say on a range of subjects as part of the ‘Your town, Your future, Your say’ consultation.

Health and wellbeing, culture, sport and community, economy and enterprise, energy and climate change, transport, landscape and biodiversity, design and housing which have been published in a Cranbrook Issues and Options Report. …

… Mark Williams, Chief Executive of East Devon District Council said:“This is the first major consultation to engage residents of Cranbrook and give people an opportunity to influence how their town grows and what they would like to see happen.

We have made amazing progress over the past five years. Cranbrook has grown from zero to over 1,300 homes and in the next five it will more than double in size. In 20 year’s time Cranbrook will be as big as Barnstaple!” …

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Question-time-Cranbrook-near-Exeter/story-29394049-detail/story.html

Good luck with that, people of Cranbrook – especially if you don’t want to live in a town the size of Barnstaple.

And you might want to check the developers’ plans – they will be very well advanced and will certainly take precedence over any ideas you may have.

Perhaps start with truly-affordable housing, garages wide enough for cars, streets wide enough for buses and a hospital (after all there is one in Barnstaple with 423 beds for its 20,000 plus population) … see where that gets you!

If Persimmon tells you they can’t afford affordable housing …

… this is why:

A leading City investor has called on housebuilder Persimmon to cut back an executive pay plan that could see the management share £600m over the next five years.

The scheme is one of the largest ever at a FTSE 100 company outside banking.

The biggest beneficiary will be chief executive Jeff Fairburn, who could earn more than £100m.

Mike Fox, from Royal London Asset Management, said the payments were too high “in all circumstances”.
He called on the board to show restraint in the light of the housing crisis and government support for the housebuilding industry.

When the scheme was put in place, the housing market had begun to recover from the 2008 recession. About 150 managers were given the opportunity to earn shares worth up to 10% of the company’s total value, provided they hit tough targets on returning money to investors.

The company recently said it was running well ahead of those targets, and analysts say it is likely the scheme will pay out in full. Persimmon shares have more than tripled in value since the incentive plan was put in place, rising from £6.20 to about £20.

Disclosure of the size of the payments is likely to stoke the debate over executive compensation.

There has been a string of investor rebellions against pay deals this year, and in April a majority of shareholders voted against a £14m package for BP boss Bob Dudley.

Shareholders cannot veto amounts paid, but do have the final say on companies’ pay policies. …

… The company has defended the payouts, saying that since the scheme was put in place. Persimmon has increased the number of new homes it builds by half and invested more than £2bn in new land. Over the same period it has handed back £1bn to shareholders.

“This is a long-term plan that runs for almost a decade which is designed to drive outperformance through the housing cycle and to incentivise the management to deliver the capital return, grow the business and increase the share price,” the company said.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36501536