Hernandez now formally under investigation

She has always maintained that she should not stand down because she was not under investigation.

Well, now she is.

Devon and Cornwall Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) Alison Hernandez is formally under investigation as part of the general election expenses row, it has been confirmed.

Ms Hernandez faces allegations she failed to properly declare election expenses when employed as the election agent for Conservative MP Kevin Foster.

Since she was elected on May 5, she has faced questions over her role in the financing of Tory campaigning but has insisted she has yet to be questioned or even contacted.

Now, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has confirmed a joint inquiry with a neighbouring force will take place to ensure independence for Devon and Cornwall police.

It said a managed investigation will be undertaken by West Mercia Police under the direction and control of the IPCC, and overseen by its deputy chair Sarah Green.

The probe will form part of a “wider investigation being undertaken by Devon and Cornwall Police” the IPCC added, in reference to separate allegations relating to other MPs implicated.

Deputy Chair Sarah Green said: “As Ms Hernandez is now a Police and Crime Commissioner, the IPCC will manage an investigation looking at whether she properly declared election expenses whilst acting as an election agent during the 2015 General Election.

On completion of the investigation we will decide whether any matters should be referred to the Crown Prosecution Service for its consideration.”

The inquiry will look into claims that more than two dozen Tory MPs failed to declare the costs of “battle buses” and hotel bills during last year’s General Election campaign.

The accused Devon and Cornwall MPs are Scott Mann in North Cornwall, George Eustice in Camborne and Redruth, Oliver Colvile in Plymouth Sutton and Devonport and Kevin Foster in Torbay.

Devon and Cornwall Police later announced that the investigation would be transferred to another police force.

The Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) made a referral to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) immediately after the PCC election.

Andrew White, OPCC chief executive, said arrangements had been put in place to protect Devon and Cornwall Police from any suggestions that they may be subject to undue influence, and to ensure that any individuals who form part of this investigation will be treated impartially by an independent police force.

Ms Hernandez, who was summoned to an emergency meeting by the Police and Crime Panel amid anger over her comments on the issue, has faced calls to step aside.

The panel warned her not to make any more “political statements”.

Exeter’s Labour MP Ben Bradshaw and former Lib Dem MP for Torbay Adrian Sanders have added to calls for Ms Hernandez to step aside.

She said she had not yet been approached but was prepared to comply with any inquiry. “I stand ready to give evidence and answer any questions and am more than ready to assist,” she added.

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Crime-Commissioner-Alison-Hernandez-officially/story-29395964-detail/story.html

Moirai – another coincidence?

Update: check out the comments on this post for further interesting information.

One of the people said to be a director of Moirai is Sarju (aka Bobby) Rach.

Could it be this person:

BobbyRach

The player on the right is identified in the image as “Bobby Rach”

http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/player.php?a=r&n=94242

Well, it is one way to raise money (or lose it)!

Our LEP and its “decisions” and “minutes”

At its last board meeting (18 May 2016) the Heart of the Southwest LEP “discussed” and ” noted” several things but doesn’t appear to have decided or actually done anything:

http://www.heartofswlep.co.uk/board-minutes-0

Unfortunately, minutes don’t appear until the next agenda is produced in July 2016.

Here is their last set of “minutes”:

Click to access LEP%20Board%20Agenda%2C%2015%20March%202016_3.pdf

Note there is no list of attendees and ” decisions” were to

“approve an approach” to “Growth Deal 3″

” agree to amend a funding allocation” followsing a “recent information from DCLG about changes to European (ERDF) funding for Nuclear build and decommissioning projects”

“note increased risk” to fund the Tiverton Urban extension and the mitigation actions being taken

“agree to delegate management decisions” about its budget to a sub-committee noting “Any variances in budget lines (singly or in aggregate) of more than 10% or £100,000 would require reference back to the board.”

Academies: can we afford (many of) them?

The man in charge of the Cornwall College Group has rejected calls from unions for him to take a pay cut.

Amarjit Basi earns £200,000 a year. The college is currently £9m in debt and around 60 staff face losing their jobs.

The University and College Union has suggested that he and other senior managers could take a drop in salary. In a statement, the college said the principal’s salary was in line with national pay scales..”

From BBC Spotlight news page today

And, yes, it is privately owned and run:

Cornwall College is a further education college situated on various sites throughout Cornwall, England, United Kingdom, with its main centre in St Austell. The college is a member of the 157 Group of [wait for it …] high performing schools. “

Wikipedia

Er, may be high performing but someone at the top can’t do their sums. Or, perhaps they can …

Whoops! As everyone in East Devon knows, referendums are not binding!

Well, we could have told you that Britain! Here in East Devon our council thinks referendums (referenda for the posh people) are just a minor annoyance and to be automatically ignored.

A really crucial detail about the upcoming EU referendum has gone virtually unmentioned and it is probably the most crucial detail: Parliament doesn’t actually have to bring Britain out of the EU if the public votes for it.

That is because the result of June 23 referendum on Britain’s EU membership is not legally binding. Instead, it is merely advisory, and, in theory, could be totally ignored by UK government.

This incredible detail is explained in a new blog post by Financial Times columnist and legal expert David Allen Green.

Green says that no legal provision was included in the EU referendum legislation that requires UK Parliament to act in accordance with the outcome of the EU referendum.

Instead, what will happen next if the public votes for a Brexit will be purely a matter of parliamentary politics.

The government could decide to put the matter to parliament and then hope to win the vote, Green says. Alternatively, ministers could attempt to negotiate an updated EU membership deal and put it to another referendum. Finally, the government could just choose to totally ignore the will of the public.”

http://uk.businessinsider.com/green-eu-referendum-not-legally-binding-brexit-2016-6?r=US&IR=T

“Greater Exeter” – not so great? Show yourselves “Greater Exeter Visioning Board”!

This article from May 2016 asks: what happened to the “vision for Greater Exeter” which, as the writer says, was a partnership between East Devon, Exeter and Teignbridge, set up in November 2014. Nothing at all exists to show what it did, does or might do in future.

It is interesting to note that, at that time, Cabinets and senior officers of all three authorities must have aware of devolution plans.

Whose Vision is it anyway

It’s a truism that politicians (and not only politicians) love making good news announcements. Even when they have to announce bad news, it’s always presented as positively as the spin doctors can manage. Announcements which are then followed up by nothing at all are not unheard of – after all, it’s the fact of announcing something that generates the media coverage, and then the circus moves on.

But what barely figures in the spin doctors’ handbook is the announcement which is then followed not so much by nothing as by a veil of secrecy. And here in Devon, we have a fine example.

On 24 November 2014, three district councils – East Devon, Exeter City and Teignbridge – announced that there were setting up a partnership to be called Greater Exeter, Greater Devon [1]. The stated aim is “to drive forward economic growth” through “joined-up decision making on planning, housing, resources and infrastructure”. A Greater Exeter Visioning Board would meet every month “to define work priorities”. The Board’s membership would be the leaders, chief executives and economic development lead councillors of each of the councils.

Leaving aside the question of whether economic growth is the right objective, this seems a potentially useful measure. The three councils cover adjacent areas and face transport and land use pressures, particularly in Exeter and its surroundings.

In the course of keeping up to date with local initiatives I recently trawled the councils’ websites for news of the monthly meetings of the Visioning Board. Nothing at all. So, focussing on Exeter City Council, I looked for minutes of meetings that approved the setting up of the Board and received reports from it. Nothing at all.

Next step, ask the council. After the usual 20 days had elapsed, an Exeter City Council officer sent me a reply confirming the Board’s membership and setting out the dates each month on which it had met since its inception . However, the reply stated that the minutes of the Board’s meetings were not available to the public, though no reason for this was given.

So, here we are. A local authority body, promoted as a driver for economic growth and coordinating policies and planning on key issues, is announced with much fanfare and then vanishes into a cloak of secrecy.

Open government, indeed. I’ve asked the City Council a series of questions about the Board’s authority, functions and accountability. Watch this space for their response.”

https://petercleasby.com/tag/greater-exeter-visioning-board/