“Four out of seven north-east councils vote against devolution Sunderland, Durham, South Tyneside and Gateshead reject proposals including election of north-eastern mayor”

” … Paul Watson, chair of the North East Combined Authority (Neca) of the seven councils, described the vote as disappointing. He said: “Each of the seven councils which make up the Neca has always made clear that they support the principle of devolution for the north-east. Following the outcome of the EU referendum and the subsequent changes within government, council leaders have been equally clear that to move forward, the new government must provide assurances regarding the terms of the region’s devolution deal.

“Extensive discussions and negotiations have taken place with government and within the region over recent months but unfortunately, despite our best efforts, it has not been possible to reach an agreement which all of the seven local authorities feel able to support. Although this is disappointing we will continue to work together with government to achieve our ambition of a stronger regional economy with improved opportunities for residents and businesses.” …

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/06/north-east-councils-vote-against-devolution-sunderland-durham-south-tyneside-gateshead

Compare and contrast with Devon and Somerset where councils are happy to vote like sheep for devolution, knowing almost nothing about, having been given minimal information by their Leaders and their business pals on the Local Enterprise Partnership.

Freedom of Information and transparency

“The Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, is to raise with ministers the transparency issues created by private companies providing an increasing proportion of public services.

Denham, who was previously information commissioner for British Columbia in Canada, replaced Christopher Graham at the Information Commissioner’s Office in July.

In an interview with Martin Rosenbaum of the BBC she said: “Private contractors above a certain threshold for a contract or doing some specific types of work could be included under the FOI Act. The government could do more to include private bodies that are basically doing work on behalf of the public.”

Denham also said she intended to review how the ICO tackles public authorities with a poor track record of handling FOI requests. This will include examining the threshold at which authorities that fail to meet deadlines for meeting requests become subject to special monitoring.
The Information commissioner said: “Looking at this from the outside, most of the public would have the view that more than one in 10 not getting a timely response to a request is not a sign of success.”

Denham also warned that the Government’s proposed introduction of fees for those who want to appeal against ICO decisions to the Information Rights Tribunal could lead to “a chill” in requesters using the appeal process.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28253%3Ainformation-commissioner-to-raise-issue-of-transparency-in-era-of-greater-outsourcing&catid=59&Itemid=27

Pop-up brothels in seaside towns!

“Inspector Dave Meredith said: “Pop-up brothels are usually holiday lets or apartments that are booked on-line by sex workers or persons who manage sex workers.

“The owners of the premises are unaware of the activities of the persons making the booking, and generally assume they have come to Newquay for a holiday.

“The booking is usually for one week, after which the premises is vacated.

“Due to the short period of time the premises is used as a brothel, it is often difficult for the police to establish that sex workers are residing there before they move on.”

He added: “We should be under no illusion that prostitution is a victimless crime.

“Women who work in these pop up brothels are often subjects of human trafficking and work under duress.

“Modern slavery is of concern to us all, and includes sex trafficking where women are forced into the commercial sex industry and held against their will by force, fraud or coercion.”

A neighbour at one of the brothels said she saw a number of shifty-looking visitors entering the house over a four-day period with some mistakenly knocking on her door.

She said: “I’ve had two blokes knocking on my door – one at four in the morning – and my neighbours have been around asking if I’ve seen anything.

“It’s a holiday let but it’s just a normal house so you wouldn’t know any different.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/seaside-towns-are-being-plagued-by-pimps-and-prostitutes/story-29690076-detail/story.html

Cranbrook: why the high turnover of councillors?

From the Cranbrook Town Council website, a comment:

Should we be worried about the high turnover rate of [Cranbrook] Town Councillors?

The turn over rate coupled with the extremely short period spent as a Councillor, by some, seems to point to some form of real and deep seated problem within the Council.

Generally working out what, or who, the problem is,is not difficult, resolving the problem however can be more difficult, but resolved it must be if the Council is going to be effective.

Just a thought! However resolved it must be!

Our local NHS in crisis

Blogged by Independent DCC Councillor Claire Wright. We await Hugo Swire’s response.

Claire Wright and MP Hugo Swire with protesters at Ottery St Mary hospital on Saturday Ref sho 21-16SH 4964. Picture: Simon Horn.

Claire Wright and MP Hugo Swire with protesters at Ottery St Mary hospital on Saturday Ref sho 21-16SH 4964. Picture: Simon Horn.

Anyone who is keeping up with the news will realise that a growing and serious crisis is enveloping the NHS.

And Devon is at the very heart of it.

It is a crisis that is borne out of many years of successive governments messing about with our health service. In the 10 years that I worked in the NHS under the Labour government, there were two major wasteful reorganisations.

Since I left the health service in 2008, the difficulties in recruiting and retaining clinical staff has rapidly escalated. And funding has been steadily eroded.

GPs are leaving the profession in their droves, there is a mass exodus of nurses – and now junior doctors are said to be reconsidering their positions, with many of those who previously wanted to pursue a career in medicine said to be thinking again.

The government will now (disastrously) remove nurse training bursaries, which is bound to discourage further trainees from applying.

The annual growth funding increase, which used to be around 6 per cent each year has, under the last two conservative governments, flatlined. It comes at a time of more pressure than ever before with more older people who have complex health needs among us. This is especially so in Devon.

On top of this, the conservative government has demanded £22bn of so called efficiency savings. Or cuts, of course. The much vaunted £8bn promised to the NHS will only be supplied if NHS trusts slash £22bn first.

Where from you might wonder? Ask the staff, many of whom are tearing their hair out trying to do an immensely demanding job without adequate resources.

Nationally, alarming and damaging cuts are already taking place, which could easily be replicated in Devon, as we live in one of the top three financially health areas in the country.

Accident and Emergency departments are being closed overnight as a result of staffing problems, with potentially catastrophic consequences as people will need to travel further for life saving treatment.

Across the health service, a deficit of £460m was racked up in the first quarter of 2016/17. But this was only possible thanks to a cash injection of £450m over the same period.

Last year the NHS nationally reported a record deficit of £2.45bn. The disastrous health and social care act, which sold our health service down the river, cost £3bn.

Locally, across Devon if financial problems are not addressed by 2020, our health service will be in debt to the tune of around £440m.

The RD&E NHS Trust alone, has a £20m deficit.

The Royal Cornwall Hospital’s director of finance Karl Simkins told the Western Morning News earlier this year that the financial landscape was “challenging”.

He said: “We planned for a £5.5 million deficit and have ended the year with a £6.9 million deficit,” “The financial position is as challenging as it has ever been.”

A government task force has been drafted in to Devon to radically reduce the debt by cutting services.

As a member of Devon County Council’s health and wellbeing scrutiny committee, I am anxiously awaiting what is on the agenda. Plans are set to be published and consulted on shortly. Councillors are expecting there to be some significant and worrying cuts proposed.

Last month a public consultation was launched in South Devon on closing and selling off four community hospitals.

The team running the Success Regime already seem to be diminishing the role of community hospitals in their documentation I have seen so far. They claim that community hospitals, such as at Sidmouth, Ottery St Mary, Seaton, Exmouth, Honiton and Axminster, do not alleviate bed pressures at the Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital! This is counter intuitive and completely contrary to everything I have heard from medics and nurses up until now.

Ottery St Mary and Axminster Hospitals have already lost their beds of course and Exmouth Hospital looks like it will lose its overnight GP out of hours service.

All of this (and whatever else is to come) is at a time of unprecedented pressure – on beds – on staffing – and on services in general.

A major injection of funding is required to avoid major and widespread closures of services and hospital departments.

This government is, in my opinion, using the austerity argument to deliberately weaken our NHS for their own ideological reasons. They simply don’t believe in the state provision of public services.

Ministers have made a clear choice on how they spend our money. Public services are being slowly and steadily dismantled, while big business continues to enjoy preferential treatment.

David Cameron said in 2010 that he would protect the NHS.

We need to hold our conservative MPs to account on this.

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/a_growing_and_serious_crisis_is_enveloping_our_nhs

Redrow profits up for third year in a row, revenue up 20% to £1.38 billion

” … FTSE 250 housebuilder Redrow continues to shrug off fears of a post-Brexit slowdown, looking forward to ‘another excellent year’ in 2017 after clocking up its third straight year of record results in the 12 months to June 30.

Redrow is the FTSE 250’s top riser this morning, with shares up 6.45 per cent or 24.80p to 409.10p.

The Flintshire-based firm reported a 23 per cent surge in pre-tax profits to £250 million for the year to June 30 after revenues rose 20 per cent to £1.38 billion, with average selling prices of homes up 7 per cent to £288,600.

Redrow said it had £807million worth of private orders at the start of the financial year, up 54 per year-on-year.

Steve Morgan, Redrow’s chief executive, told the BBC today he had ‘not seen any blip whatsoever’ from Britain’s Brexit vote.

Chris Millington, an analyst at Numis, said: ‘Redrow’s full year results are marginally ahead of Numis’ estimates and we are leaving our forecasts for 2017 unchanged.

‘The company has seen strong trading post the EU Referendum and the private forward order book stands 54% up yoy, which gives a good underpinning to 2017. Whilst Redrow’s shares have recovered much of the reduction seen post Brexit and now only trade c.10% below 23/06, they still look good value.’ ”

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/article-3775641/Housebuilder-Berkeley-slams-stamp-duty-hikes-liquidity-crunch-UK-property-market.html

How developers avoid social housing – employ a specialist company

On a depressing note, see the following, a company based in Sevenoaks:

image

http://www.affordablehousing106.com/casestudies.html

“Affordable housing 106” is anything but helping the affordable housing situation in this country.

This case study page boasts about recent victories for clients, including:

– negotiating down from 50% to 25% the proportion of affordable housing for a project in South London: while the local Council wanted a 70/30 split between rent and shared ownership, the company facilitated 100% shared ownership tenure;

– facilitated commuted sum in lieu of affordable housing for a proposed care home development in the South East

– negotiated a Deed of Variation for an existing 106 Agreement in East London, whereby the owner/developer secured ownership/management of the affordable housing units.

Of course we have a similar company in Exeter:

http://www.section-106.co.uk/

image

To take but one local example from their case studies:

Acting as both principals and in collaboration with Somerfield Food Stores in connection with a planning application to redevelop a 50 dwelling brown field site. Torridge District Council Planning officers sought a Section 106 agreement providing 20% affordable housing. Using a viability appraisal we were able to negotiate a reduction to 12%, saving circa £150,000.”

Presumably the families of employees of these companies have no need of sich housing themselves – lucky people.

Estate agent or developer?

Interesting advertisement in a recent Midweek Herald. Estate agent Greenslade Taylor Hunt is seeking assist in to influencing the draft East Devon Villages Plan by persuading landowners in turn to “to influence planning policy in the villages of East Devon”.

And if landowners don’t want to ‘influence’ planning by turning land into housing estates themselves, GTH will facilitate interaction with a house builder to help to get planning permission.

Seems that it is no longer enough to be an estate agent you have to be a “land and planning specialist” too.

And begs the question: what if an estate agent (or land and planning agent) is assisting with selling a house that he or she knows is next to a possible development site being handled by the same firm? Will they declare an interest?

EDDC Cabinet Meeting – 14 September 2016: highlights

Agenda here:

Click to access combined-cab-agenda140916final.pdf

Highlights:

Forward plans: discussion on public toilets at Cabinet in November 2016. Closing them or charging for them?

Next relocation update: 21 December 2016 Cabinet meeting
in line with burying bad news at the start of a long holiday.

Business Support and Thelma Hulbert Gallery reviews – no dates set.
Obviously a new grouping to take the place of the East Devon Business Forum and giving the Gallery longer to lose its (subsidised by us) money. Perhaps it will be relocated to the new HQ (wonder how much costs are increasing on that?)

Agenda Item 12 – Port Royal, Sidmouth – Scoping Study and Project Brief.
Whose scope, whose project?