“There’s going to be a general election, so let’s talk about the Tory MPs still under investigation for election fraud”

“Theresa May has announced a snap election on 8 June 2017. But as the country prepares for another election campaign, it’s important to remember that MPs in her party are being investigated for election fraud for the 2015 general election. And given the mainstream media’s reluctance to report the issue, we need to ensure it is kept firmly on the agenda.

Allegations of fraud

12 police forces have submitted files to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) over allegations that up to 20 MPs and/or their agents broke election spending limits in the 2015 election. The CPS is deciding whether charges should be brought. And a decision is expected soon – and is likely to come during the election campaign.

The allegations centre around the ‘battle bus’ campaign, and associated expenses such as hotel rooms. Many argue that the campaign promoted prospective local MPs in key seats. Under election law, any expenditure which promotes a local candidate should be covered locally. But the ‘battle bus’ and associated costs were declared nationally. Each constituency has a fixed amount of money it can spend locally. And including the ‘battle bus’ expenditure would have meant many candidates overspent.

Additionally, the Election Commission fined the Conservatives £70,000 for multiple breaches in connection to election spending during the 2015 campaign.

And there’s more

But it isn’t just the “battle bus” campaigns where the Conservatives have been accused of fraud. As The Canary previously reported, there are questions over how the party used social media and, particularly, Facebook, to target voters.

And a report by the London School of Economics has also warned [pdf] that Facebook targeting opens the door to electoral fraud:

The ability to target specific people within a particular geographic area gives parties the opportunity to focus their attention on marginal voters within marginal constituencies. This means, in practice, that parties can direct significant effort – and therefore spending – at a small number of crucial seats. Yet, though the social media spending may be targeted directly at those constituencies, and at particular voters within those constituencies, the spending can currently be defined as national, for which limits are set far higher than for constituency spending.
Implications

Theresa May might think she is avoiding difficult byelections if charges are brought in any of the constituencies. But she is equally taking a huge risk. There is a possibility that she will be running an election campaign while MPs are facing fraud charges. And then there’s the question of whether those MPs and their agents will run in this election.

Either way, the British public get to choose whether they want to vote for a party being investigated for fraud; and a party that’s already been fined £70,000 for election expenses breaches. But in order to do so, it is essential we do not allow the issue to be swept under the table.”

Source: https://www.thecanary.co/2017/04/18/theres-going-general-election-lets-talk-20-tory-mps-still-investigation-election-fraud/

2 thoughts on ““There’s going to be a general election, so let’s talk about the Tory MPs still under investigation for election fraud”

  1. The key point about election spending is that it gives a MASSIVE advantage to the large parties, and in particular the Conservative party which has the deepest pockets, and deeply disadvantages minority parties and Independent candidates.

    Indeed it could be argued that a snap election was deliberately called before the CPS has decided whether to prosecute and before new rules can be brought in to ensure that elections are fought fairly without misuse of social media and battle busses.

    Personally I urge everyone to think carefully about who they are going to vote for – and not simply vote the way you have always voted in the past.

    Like

  2. How about talking about how the electorate of East Devon can rid itself of Hugo Swine?
    He cannot and will not get in as long as everybody stands behind Claire Wright, committed as she is as an Independent representing local people, no party whip to follow, and the opportunity to save enormous amounts of money wasted and squandered by the incumbent in his occupation of the East Devon seat.
    Recent revelations about his payments of about £5,000 per month spit in the eye of us all.
    It is a disgrace that they can still operate and gain huge personal advantage from his position as our MP .
    Kick him out! It’s what he deserves.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s