The free market – free to whom and for what? Not broadband!

“BT could face a legal challenge over proposals to spend up to £600 million connecting a million homes in rural areas with faster broadband, amid criticism that an offer it has made to government represents a “backroom deal” will tighten its monopoly grip on the sector.

Rivals including Talktalk, Sky, Hyperoptic and Gigaclear oppose BT’s proposal for a “voluntary” deal to connect every home in Britain with a minimum speed of ten megabits a second, fast enough to stream movies or browse the web.

While they support proposed upgrades to a minimum national standard, a so-called universal service obligation (USO), they support a different model to carry out and fund them.

An industry source said that several companies had taken legal advice about a potential legal challenge if the government accepted BT’s offer to make the improvements on its own and to pass on the costs to rivals.

The source said: “The law is very clear on how a USO should be delivered. BT and government can’t simply call the USO something else and hope the law doesn’t apply. If BT persuades the government to ignore the legal framework, they could face years in court. That would derail the process and leave customers waiting even longer for the fast broadband they deserve.”

Matthew Hare, chief executive of Gigaclear, a rural broadband specialist, said: “If the government were to go with BT’s voluntary deal, this would effectively stifle competition.”

He said that Gigaclear had not yet considered legal action, “but we strongly believe that a regulated universal service obligation is the only way to guarantee a competitive marketplace. Competition is vital, not only to give consumers choice and access to high-quality broadband, but also to secure the future of this country’s digital economy.”

A government consultation concluded this month, with a final decision on how to proceed likely to be made by Christmas.

Most of BT’s competitors favour a regulated model, in which all broadband operators would invest, with costs recovered from consumers via a levy on profits or another funding mechanism. BT is pressing for an alternative, under which it would make the improvements itself, with the costs of up to £600 million passed on to its wholesale customers, who protest that they would have no control over how the money was spent or the technology used.

Sharon White, chief executive of Ofcom, said that in the event of a voluntary deal, the regulator would apply a “very, very careful approach” to ensure BT would not pocket any difference.”

Source: Times (pay wall)

Is Swire an “iron man” or “anaemic”?

Judge for yourself:

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/iron-man-sir-hugo-swire-raises-awareness-of-anaemia-1-5248663

“Three Quarters Of Tory Councillors Worried About Cuts To Children’s Centres, Poll Reveals”

Owl says: Yet it is their party and their votes that have caused this situation.

“Nearly three quarters of Conservative councillors are worried about government funding cuts to children’s centres, a new poll has revealed.

The research, which saw 508 Tory local government representatives quizzed by charity Action for Children, showed 72% believe long-term funding for children’s services is a major concern for their council.

More than half say budget restrictions are making it harder for councils to meet their responsibilities towards children and young people, while 38% believe there is a “lack of clear direction and funding” from government.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/three-quarters-of-tory-councillors-worried-about-cuts-to-childrens-centres-poll-reveals_uk_59ecabb8e4b0958c4682b7a2

EAST DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL PLANNERS RECOMMEND DEVELOPMENT ON HIGH RISK FLOOD ZONES AT WINSLADE PARK

PRESS RELEASE

[Here’s a summary of recent developments regarding local planning applications which are likely to affect village residents. As you will see, things are once again starting to ‘move’ and we will endeavour toi keep you updated on decisions and outcomes if and when they occur. We are aware that since the Save Clyst St Mary campaign was first launched, nearly four years ago, a number of new residents have moved to the village who may wish to join the group. Should you know of anyone who has moved here since early 2014, we would be grateful if you could forward this document and encourage new residents to sign up to subsequent updates (via our email address or a note through the door of 11, Clyst Valley Road).]

“The latest hybrid planning application (16/2460/MOUT) from Friends Life Limited/Aviva for 150 dwellings, plus employment and new workplace units at Winslade Park is due to be considered by East Devon District Council’s Development Management Committee on 31st October 2017, with the Planning Officers’ Recommendation to the Committee of Approval with Conditions within a 58-page document containing 20 Conditions plus a proposed Viability Legal Agreement.

The outline new build part of the application incorporates very limited information, which the majority of Consultees have found insufficient for making informed decisions and have either recommended refusal (Devon County Highways), have major concerns, find the proposals unacceptable or object (including Historic England, Sport England, the Parish Council, Ward Councillor and East Devon’s Historic Conservation, Landscape, Tree and Environmental Health Departments), plus 225 total objections generated by local residents.

For the existing local community of Clyst St Mary the flood risk is a major concern because historically the Grindle Brook and River Clyst have frequently caused severe damage.

[Pictures of historical flooding]

The link below identifies the current flood risk and shows the vulnerability of the Winslade Park site, proving that substantial future flood defences are essential.

https://flood-warning-information.service.gov.uk/long-term-flood-risk/map?easting=297816&northing=90559&address=100040161688

East Devon’s planning recommendation states “The access road leading into the site, the area where the offices are proposed and areas of land around the Grindle Brook running through the site fall within flood zones 2 and 3 on the Environment Agency’s mapping system.

The new-build employment units are identified to be located adjacent to the entrance drive, part of this site is within flood zone 2 and a smaller part is in flood zone 3. Whilst it is not best practice to site new buildings in the flood zone, the allocation of the site is constrained by the flood zone(s) and if all buildings were sited outside the flood zone(s) then it is considered that the quantum of development in the allocation could not reasonably be delivered and therefore could affect the viability of the scheme. The employment use would be a less vulnerable use than the residential use and therefore it is less likely to be used/occupied in the event of a flood. Accordingly, it is considered that the proposed location of the employment units (based on the illustrative layout) would be acceptable and is the most appropriate location.”

Although the Environment Agency has been provided with a Flood Risk Assessment, their own website states that “flood defences do not completely remove the chance of flooding and can fail in extreme weather conditions,” leaving future residential and employment users of this site at risk.

Aviva is one of the linked companies associated with this proposed development at Winslade Park. Their Chief Executive, Mark Wilson, was noted for finalising the £5.6 billion acquisition of Friends Life with the resulting merger turning Aviva into one of the UK’s largest investors managing £300 billion plus assets.

Writing in the Telegraph in 2014, he emphasised that there should be a halt on building on “defenceless” flood plains. He stated that “As a nation we need to build more homes, but the cost of development must include the cost of defences. We can’t stop the weather, but we can act in unison to minimise the impact of extreme events and we know that the threat is only going to increase, with scientists predicting greater flood frequency and extreme weather as a result of climate change. Although the current focus for us all is coastal and river flooding, surface water flooding is a major concern. More homes, driveways and car parks all contribute to more water flowing into the system, and flowing quickly.”

He acknowledged that flooding is one of the most traumatic events that any householder or business can face, with families forced out of their homes, valuable and much-loved possessions being ruined and businesses struggling to trade. It can be many months before the drying-out process is completed and subsequent repairs can commence and he understood the emotional cost, trauma and feeling of vulnerability that comes with flooding. His mantra continued “Let’s be crystal clear: no defences, no development.”

Such strong opinions on flooding are applauded and ideally could benefit the development proposals by the Insurance Group for the residential, workplace and community areas at Winslade Park, Clyst St Mary that lie within flood zones!

The accessibility of guarantees for affordable insurance on households and businesses in flood-prone areas is comforting for existing homes and businesses but is East Devon District Council so restricted in the availability of quality development sites throughout their sizeable District that they are left reliant on recommending development on high risk flood zones?”

Update on “Stop the new plans to dismantle our NHS” petition

“Thank you for signing the petition STOP the new plans to dismantle our NHS. Please share.

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-the-plans-to-dismantle-our-nhs

It is becoming clear that the mandated cuts of £22bn over 5 years the 44 STPs were supposedly ‘planned’ to fix, are not going to be possible in spite of some Hospital Trusts and CCGs doing what they said they would do to ‘deliver’ the NHS England mandated harsh, control totals.

Why are we not surprised?

The NHS Constitution has been broken in Hertfordshire where the CCG has decided to stop elective operations indefinitely for people who smoke and those with a BMI of 30 and above, in spite of fierce opposition from the Royal College of Surgeons and decidedly NOT the answer.

The obscene cost of a ‘market structure’ at the heart of the NHS is ignored in all this, obscured as many new MPs find out on entering Parliament and asking the question, by the fact that not one NHS body has the mandate to collect the information. This must be policy!

Academics estimate 12 to 30% NHS budget goes on transactions costs of the market, the high costs of PFI and prices of drugs and technologies (which rise ahead of NHS pay) in addition to the costs of management consultants. All this and not a patient treated. This must also be policy.

GPs and CCGs are not open about whether you are referred for treatment to an NHS or non-NHS organisation, ie for-profit, Community Interest Company or charity.

These plans are a smokescreen for further privatisation and finance industry involvement in the NHS.

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-the-plans-to-dismantle-our-nhs

Please share.

Thanks for staying with us! We appreciate it greatly. With your help we CAN win this!”