Maybe East Devonians might want to write to their MP, Simon Jupp or Neil Parish, to give their views on what Rees-Mogg called “just fluff” and “fundamentally trivial”?
If so, here are their emails (please remember to include your postcode):
Latest video, utterly brilliant.
No mention of reducing sewage discharges – Owl
The parent company of South West Water is promising to slash bills for customers this year even though it has been hit by rising costs thanks to the war in Ukraine.
William Telford www.business-live.co.uk
Exeter-headquartered Pennon Group Plc said there will be a bill cut for 2022/23, and that bills will be lower than they were 10 years ago.
In a trading statement to investors, Pennon said it was aware of the financial pressures customers were facing and was doing all it could to support them.
The company said: “We recognise the pressure that inflationary pricing increases may pose to our customers. Our broad range of affordability measures ensures we are able to support those in need of support, and we are pleased that for the coming year bills will continue to be lower than they were 10 years ago, driven by our continued focus on delivering improvements efficiently and effectively.”
In February, Pennon said the average South West Water bill for water and wastewater services will be lower in 2022/23 than last year. The average household bill will now be £472, a fall from £483 in 2021/22. Customers will also continue to benefit from the £50 Government Contribution, to cut household bills, for 2022/23.
The company said, in its statement to the London Stock Exchange, it will be posting out lower bills despite facing mounting inflation itself. It said that whilst long-term protection from increasing prices was provided through its inflation-linked revenues and growth in the capital value of the business, the group still expects costs to go up.
This is because 26% of Pennon’s regulated water businesses’ gross debt of £3.1bn is index linked, meaning a 1% increase in inflation results in an additional £8m of financing costs.
And wholesale power costs account for about 10% of Pennon’s regulated water businesses’ operating costs. Although Pennon is about 60% hedged for 2022/23 it still has about 40% exposure to wholesale market prices, which have increased significantly over recent weeks because of the current geopolitical situation, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
However, Pennon told investors it remains on track to deliver “resilient financial and operational performance” across the group in line with management expectations, despite this “challenging macro-economic environment”.
Meanwhile, the company also said there is unlikely to be a water shortage although it is looking at a new reservoir site in the South West. The statement said: “As we enter the summer period, our water resources remain in a robust position with reservoir storage at about 93%. We continue to look for strategic value enhancing opportunities in this area having recently procured a site for development in our region.”
Pennon said its recently approved merger with Bristol Water means integration between the two businesses is already under way and it is targeting synergies of about £20m per annum across the group by 2024/25.
In March the Competitions and Markets Authority (CMA) approved Pennon’s £425m takeover of Bristol Water after being satisfied separate price controls will be maintained.
Pennon said the integration is anticipated to be complete during the next 24 months and added: “Synergies of c£20m per annum by 2024/25 have been identified across the group through service improvements, driving supply chain efficiencies, creating common systems and processes, and sharing best practice. We expect the profile of these efficiencies to ramp up to deliver c£50m over K7 (2020-2025), with one-off, non-underlying integration costs of c£10m anticipated.
“Pennon will retain the valuable Bristol Water brand and will continue to deliver the existing PR19 business plans of both South West Water and Bristol Water. For PR24, the combined entity will deliver for all our regulated water customers in accordance with a single business plan, with separate price controls.”
Boris Johnson is facing another three potential fines for lockdown breaches, according to senior sources, as he suffered his first ministerial resignation over the Partygate scandal.
Jessica Elgot www.theguardian.com
In a sign of the continued nervousness in government that the prime minister’s position could come under threat when MPs return to Westminster from recess next week, a Downing Street source admitted the apparent lull felt like “calm before the potential storm”.
Lords justice minister David Wolfson quit his role on Wednesday following the news that Johnson and Rishi Sunak had been given a fixed-penalty notice for breaking their own Covid laws by attending a party for the prime minister’s birthday in No 10.
Wolfson said he was resigning not only because of the prime minister’s “own conduct” but also “the official response to what took place”. He said the behaviour stood in stark contrast to many in society who “complied with the rules at great personal cost, and others were fined or prosecuted for similar, and sometimes apparently more trivial, offences”.
Johnson sought to rally senior ministers behind him by holding a virtual cabinet on Wednesday afternoon. The Welsh secretary, Simon Hart, said Johnson would not quit even if he received multiple fines. “I don’t necessarily see the difference between one or two,” he told Times Radio.
By Wednesday afternoon, before Wolfson’s resignation, momentum appeared to have stalled for MPs prepared to oust Johnson – just two Tory MPs added their voices to calls for the prime minister to resign, the Amber Valley MP Nigel Mills and Craig Whittaker, the MP for Calder Valley.
Mills said he would be writing a letter of no confidence to the chair of the 1922 Committee: “I think for a prime minister in office to be given a fine and accept it and pay it for breaking the laws that he introduced … is just an impossible position,” he said.
In the Halifax Courier, Whittaker called for the PM to resign and “do the right thing” – though said he would not write a letter of no confidence, predicting that Johnson would win any vote.
On social media, the majority of MPs rallied to Johnson’s defence. But a former No 10 adviser predicted the fines could still prove “fatal” for the prime minister’s career. “Conservatives, if they stand for anything, stand for the rule of law and the maintenance of order,” they said. “If they cannot abide their own rules, and do not show humility in the face of justice, it is impossible for them to maintain that mantle.”
Key insiders said they believed Johnson was likely to receive at least three more fines for events that have not yet been fully investigated by police.
The events that the Metropolitan police have yet to examine, which Johnson attended, include the May 2020 summer party, a November gathering in Johnson’s flat with his wife on the day of Dominic Cummings’ departure, and a leaving do for a senior aide in No 10 a day later. Sources said no attender had yet received a fine for those events.
Some Tories have expressed concern that Johnson’s strategy has been to downplay the significance of the event for which he was fined – a short birthday gathering in the cabinet room. “It’s been a terrible comms blunder for MPs to be briefed that the event only lasted 10 minutes and that the PM has been unfairly maligned,” one Tory source said.
Lord Frost, the former cabinet minister, also expressed concern that further damaging revelations were to come. “I think it’s not possible just to say, ‘That was then, this is now, let’s move on, the world is different,’ as the government is trying to this morning,” he told LBC. “We don’t yet know what other penalties may be issued, and to whom.”
No 10 sources said the prime minister had attended the birthday gathering in the cabinet room in June 2020 for less than 10 minutes, eating salad from a plastic bowl and declining any alcohol or party food.
But those who attended the birthday party for the prime minister say they have raised eyebrows at the description of the gathering, with one describing it as a “party atmosphere” with singing, attended by his wife, Carrie Johnson, and his interior designer Lulu Lytle.
Another said they believe photos taken of the event by Johnson’s personal photographer – which have been disclosed to the official Sue Gray investigation into lockdown parties – would leave it beyond doubt that it was an event that breached the rules.
One policing source said an assessment by Met detectives that the PM breached the rules more than once would increase future fines. The level of fine would go up each time Johnson was found to have, or accepted that he had, breached the rules he had introduced.
The source added that the defence Johnson and his supporters were making, that people did not realise they were at parties, was “specious” because the raft of rules were written to stop any indoor gathering of people: “The law never talked about parties, it talked about gatherings. It does not have to be music and dancing – you could not gather indoors.
“The whole reason was to stop the transmission of the disease. The disregard for public health is startling. Why would you not know you were breaching the rules?”
Though three MPs who have previously called for Johnson to go said the war in Ukraine meant they did not believe it was the right moment for a contest, others stood by their letters of no confidence on Thursday, including Gary Streeter, Caroline Nokes, Anthony Mangnall and Tobias Ellwood.
Another MP said they were deeply worried about further revelations and a “drip-drip” ahead of the local elections and the final Gray report. “Each one of these will come as a hammer into the nail of the Tory coffin and what the PM is doing is implicating all the MPs in this. We are in an a long, slow death march.”
The chancellor, Rishi Sunak, has also apologised for breaching the rules, having received a fixed-penalty notice for attending the gathering, after a seven-hour deliberation during which he is reported to have been considering his position.
Allies of Sunak said on Wednesday they believed it had been a missed opportunity for the chancellor not to resign on Tuesday after he receiving the fixed-penalty notice. “My view is he should have gone months ago and kept his integrity intact, but now he is at the mercy of potentially being sacked this summer,” one said.