Order aims to tackle booze-fuelled bad behaviour on Exmouth beach

Residents are being asked for their views on a bid to crack down on booze-fuelled bad behaviour on Exmouth beach.

eastdevonnews.co.uk 

District council chiefs have launched a consultation over plans to extend a Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) which already covers part of the town centre.

Begging and use of public places as a toilet will also be targeted if the initiative is given the go-ahead.

The authority says it is considering the move due to an increase in alcohol-related antisocial antics.

It would restrict certain activities such as:

  • Possessing an intoxicating substance including alcohol;
  • Urination and defecation within a street or public place;
  • Aggressive requests for money;
  • Intimidation, harassment, alarm or distress.

East Devon District Council (EDDC) says the PSPO does not ‘ban’ alcohol at proposed locations.

But it added the measure is ‘a tool for police and authorised council staff to be able to deal with people who may be deemed as behaving in an antisocial way’.

Rules are have been in place in The Strand, Magnolia Centre, Station car park, Manor Gardens, and The Plantation areas since May 2020.

It is proposed the order is extended to the mean low tide mark on Exmouth beach, as well as some surrounding spaces.

Councillor Nick Hookway, EDDC portfolio holder for culture, tourism, leisure and sport, said: “The Public Space Protection Orders in Exmouth have proven to be successful for several years, but to reduce antisocial behaviour further, the recommendation is to include the beach itself.

“By extending these orders to include the beach, it will provide that extra reassurance for Exmouth residents and visitors that any antisocial behaviour can be dealt with speedily and effectively.

“I encourage you to take this opportunity to give your views in the consultation.”

The deadline for comments on the mooted PSPO extension is 5pm in June 20.

They can be emailed to pspoconsultation@eastdevon.gov.uk or sent by post to: Environmental Health, East Devon District Council, Blackdown House, Border Road, Heathpark Industrial Estate, Honiton, EX14 1EJ.

Sex pest former council leader Brian Greenslade is jailed

A former Devon council leader with a ‘dark side’ has been jailed for sexually assaulting three women.

Paul Greaves www.devonlive.com

Brian Greenslade, 72, a long-time leader of Devon County Council, assaulted two of his victims while on council business.

He lunged at one of the women, trying to kiss her, and put his hands down her trousers while she tried to push him away. He groped and fondled the other women’s breasts.

Greenslade, who led the council for 16 years and was also chairman of the Devon and Cornwall Police Authority, denied any of the incidents ever happened and suggested one of the women had been ‘put up to it’ for political reasons.

But the jury agreed with the prosecution that he was ‘completely driven by ego and self importance’.

A judge sentencing him said he had abused his position of power and status when committing the offences.

Judge Timothy Rose said: “You’ve lived a long life in the service of your local community, particularly in the county of Devon.

“It seems to me throughout a large part of that period you had a dark side to you that you couldn’t control yourself in the presence of women.”

Greenslade, of Marwood, Barnstaple, was found guilty of two charges of indecent assault and one sexual assault dating back to the 1990s and mid 2000s.

He was jailed for 16 months.

The first incident happened when Greenslade was alone with the woman on council business. He suddenly lunged at her, grabbing both her arms and tried to kiss her. He then put his hand down the front of her trousers. She tried to resist and pull away but he was too strong for her.

The woman drove off in shock and disbelief at what had happened.

In a victim statement read to the court she said: “He was in a privileged position which he abused. I was completely embarrassed, ashamed and angry.

“I asked myself why he thought he could do that.

“This was a period when men had mistresses and men thought they could do as they liked.”

The second victim said she was assaulted by Greenslade during a function at the County Hall.

The leader of the council approached her and spoke to her before putting his arm around her and fondling her breast. She told him to move his hand or she would break his fingers.

She said she did not report the assault at the time because she thought she would get into trouble.

“It was a shocking experience and still shocks me now,” she said. It was only recently she had come to the conclusion that she had done nothing wrong and that Greenslade had acted in an outrageous way

The third incident happened in the 1990s when Greenslade was working as an accountant.

He stood behind a woman in an office and reached over to grab her breast. She could recall feeling sick and shaking while he just grinned. She said she had been terrified by the incident.

The process of coming back to court to relive the event in the witness box had given her a panic attack. She too had felt guilty for not reporting the incident sooner.

Miss Carolina Guiloff, in mitigation, said each of the incidents had been short lived and opportunistic. During his 36 years working for the council he had supported many women in their work and ‘clearly wasn’t a misogynist’.

He now suffered ill-health and shortly before his arrest in 2018 had suffered a minor heart attack. She said nothing could be gained by sending the pensioner to prison.

Judge Timothy Rose said one of the themes of the case was a powerful man who thought he could get away with sexual actions against women.

He added: “You were a powerful man, and you were the leader of the council and you were the one able to carry on with your life as if nothing had happened.”

He added: “You took advantage of situations you were in. One possible explanation is you came to believe nobody would complain about you and you would be able to get away with it.”

He said appeared Greenslade could not ‘control himself’ in the presence of women.

“You thought you could get away with it because nobody would go against you. You simply couldn’t control yourself. You took advantage of your character, your status and position and benefited from it over years until such time as your victims were able to come forward and I commend them for doing so. It took a great deal of bravery.”

The three women came forward with their allegations in 2018. It followed a public censure of Greenslade by the county council on the grounds of his harassment of members of staff.

After the sentencing a spokesman for Devon County Council said: “Our thoughts are with the survivors who suffered at the hands of Brian Greenslade.

“We are pleased that our actions in 2017 in response to complaints from members of council staff have helped to shine a light on the issue of sexual harassment and inappropriate conduct in the workplace and particularly when involving those in positions of authority.

“This council has very firm and clear expectations with regards to the conduct of all its staff and elected members including how councillors interact with the council’s employees.

“We will always take allegations of inappropriate sexual behaviour and harassment very seriously and act swiftly.

“When allegations of this nature came to light in 2017, we acted quickly to thoroughly investigate them as part of our procedures, and the strongest possible sanctions on the former councillor were imposed. Most importantly all those staff impacted have been supported and continue to be so.”

Ann Hampshire of the CPS said: “Brian Greenslade was a respected and well-known public figure for many years but there was another side to his character.

“His position of authority made him confident that his victims would not complain or, even if they had, that they would not have been believed.

“All three women have said that his position was a factor in their decision not to report him at the time of the offences. I would like to thank them for coming forward when they did and for supporting this prosecution”.

The Police and Crime Commissioner for Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly Alison Hernandez has praised the victims for their tenacity.

Ms Hernandez said: “I would like to pay tribute to Brian Greenslade’s victims, who not only came forward to give evidence in the first place but who were then put through the ordeal of a trial that could have been avoided had he admitted his vile crimes in the first place.

“It is the victims’ tenacity and faith in the police and the criminal justice system that has persuaded a jury of his guilt and perhaps prevented yet more offences. I would urge all those affected by sexual offences to seek specialist help and advice from the wide range of services available, many of which are commissioned by my office.

“I hope this conviction sends a message to both victims and offenders that complaints will be taken seriously, investigations will be carried out and convictions can be secured.”

Free practical and emotional help and advice for crime victims, whether or not it has been reported to police, is available from the Devon and Cornwall Victim Care Unit on 01392 475900 or via Victim Support 24/7, on 0808 1689 111 or online at www.victimsupport.org.uk.

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 10 May

Turning shut-down shops into homes? It’ll be the developers who enjoy the bargains

Landowners of Britain, rejoice! Your government has not forgotten you. Magnanimous and generous as it is, it has dedicated the vast public resources at its disposal to a noble cause, that of increasing the value of the property you own. Planning is relaxed, taxation reduced and subsidies introduced, all with the effect of increasing the already high prices of land and buildings in this country.

Rowan Moore  www.theguardian.com 

The government doesn’t put it like this. Its departments and ministers say that “we can help the high street to adapt and thrive for the future” or that its policies “will help support the creation of much-needed homes” or that first-time buyers will have a better chance to get on the property ladder. But the most certain effect is that often substantial windfalls arrive in the balance sheets of those who already own.

Take, for example, the policy that shops can be made into homes without planning permission, which came into effect in April. As has been widely pointed out, this is likely to have the effect of accelerating rather than reversing the decline in high streets, as owners push out viable businesses for no other reason than that they can make more money by turning their premises into homes.

What was once an active shopfront, with people going in and out all day long, becomes a domestic front door, which contributes less to the liveliness of the neighbourhood. Past downturns have enabled new businesses to flourish, taking advantage of low rents to revive high streets – market cycles, to put it another way, periodically reduce owners’ wealth to the benefit of tenants and the liveliness of the high street. Conversion from retail excludes that possibility for ever.

There are, of course, redundant retail buildings that can beneficially be turned into homes, but it requires some planning to work out where this is best done and planning is what the new policy excludes. It also removes the possibility of what is called planning gain, realised through instruments such as section 106 agreements or the community infrastructure levy (CIL), which is the ability of local authorities to require contributions to such things as affordable housing as a condition of planning permission.

We have been here before, with the eight-year-old policy of enabling offices to be made into homes without planning consent. The effects, in terms of the quality of the homes created, have been largely disastrous. As with the new policy on retail, the opportunity for planning gain was removed, so that the owners of office blocks that benefited from the policy sometimes saw their values double. “Retail,” say the property consultants Lambert Smith Hampton in relation to the new policy, “may offer far greater potential for change of use to residential over the years ahead than offices.” They also say that “the scale of opportunity is, potentially, huge”, that the absence of section 106 requirements is “a specific pull factor” and that “seeking change of use via this route can support developer profit margins and boost scheme viability”.

This is, in effect, a vast giveaway of public assets. Ever since the Town and Country Planning Act of 1947, development rights to land – as opposed to the land itself – are, in effect, public property. When planning permission is granted, a defined part of those rights and whatever value goes with it are transferred to the landowner. This principle gives local authorities leverage to require public benefits and to plan development. If those rights are simply given away, as is happening with retail-to-residential conversions, value and leverage go with them.

Meanwhile, the government has used public finances on a number of schemes intended to help first-time buyers and others desperate for a home that suits their needs. The help-to-buy programme, which started in 2013, enables buyers to borrow money from the government on favourable terms. Last summer, as part of its response to the pandemic, the Treasury reduced the stamp duty that you have to pay when you buy a house. This reduction is temporary and is due to be phased out later this year.

Both measures might have their uses in reviving stagnant property markets, but where demand is high they have the effect of pushing up the prices of homes, thus cancelling out the benefit they might have brought to buyers. One of the side effects of help to buy was to enlarge the profits of housebuilding giants such as Persimmon, which contributed to the £75m bonus that its chief executive, Jeff Fairburn, took in 2017, having first been offered more than £100m. Purchasers report developers using help to buy to push up the value of their flat. Meanwhile, the price of an average home rose by £24,000 in the 12 months from March 2020, despite the economic contraction of lockdown, substantially boosted by the stamp duty holiday.

Further winning owners are likely to be created by the government’s makeover of the planning system, set out in a white paper last year, which figured prominently in the recent Queen’s speech. Areas of the country will be zoned for “growth”, benefiting from automatic outline planning permission, which, again, is likely to increase values. Here, at least, there are plans to capture some of this value for public benefits, replacing section 106 and CIL with a new levy. There’s too little detail yet to know how this will work. We can only hope that the government will buck its own trends and make sure that it benefits the property have-nots over the already-have-plenties.

Exclusive: Property tycoons gave Tories more than £11m in less than a year

Published last June but still relevant – Owl

Peter Geoghegan www.opendemocracy.net 

The Conservatives have received more than £11 million from some of the UK’s richest property developers and construction businesses since Boris Johnson became prime minister last July, an openDemocracy investigation has found.

Donations to the Tories from the property business increased significantly over the past year, with more than 120 individuals and companies connected to the sector giving money.

Just six leading Tory donors linked to the property sector gave more than £4.5 million since July – a four-fold increase in their donations from the final year of Theresa May’s premiership.

Other recent Conservative donors include controversial luxury property developer Nick Candy and West Ham United owner David Sullivan, who donated £75,000 ahead of December’s general election through a small property company he controls, according to figures from the Electoral Commission.

Commenting on openDemocracy’s findings, Transparency International’s Steve Goodrich said: “The corrupting influence of big money from UK politics must be removed before it irreparably damages trust in our democracy.”

“Once again, we see the Conservatives in hock to their wealthy donors”

Details of the Conservatives’ reliance on property tycoons comes as housing secretary Robert Jenrick is under fire after admitting unlawful “apparent bias” in over-ruling local officials who rejected Tory donor Richard Desmond’s £1billion Tower Hamlets housing development and fast-tracking the planning process saving the property developer £45 million.

Desmond – who had sat beside Jenrick at a £900-a-head Conservative fundraiser at the Savoy Hotel in London late last year – subsequently donated £12,000 to the Conservatives.

In a BBC interview defending Jenrick earlier this week, business minister Nadhim Zahawi said that voters who wanted to raise planning issues with their MPs could likewise go to a Conservative fundraiser.

“They will be sitting next to MPs and other people in their local authorities and can interact with different parts of the authority,” Zahawi told the Today programme.

Jenrick is not the only senior Tory facing questions about his links to property developers. Former planning minister Bob Neill is under investigation by the parliamentary watchdog for failing to mention that he was a paid consultant for a luxury hotel development that he lobbied for in his Kent constituency. Neill denies any wrong-doing.

Sue Hawley of Spotlight on Corruption said: “It’s time for a serious review of conflicts of interest in UK planning.

“It is entirely wrong that those with money can gain access to politicians that puts their interests above the rest of us,” she told openDemocracy.

Many of the property tycoons who have donated to the Conservatives in the past year would qualify to become part of the Leader’s Group of top donors where, for a minimum of £50,000 a year, they can attend quarterly meetings with the prime minister and senior cabinet ministers. Conversations are off the record.

A previous openDemocracy investigation found that Leader’s Group donors had given more than £130 million to the Conservatives since 2010. Previous commitments to publish lists of attendees have not been kept. Earlier this year, the Tories scrubbed details of previous Leader’s Group meetings off the party website.

Big money

Property has long been a major issue in British politics, and many of the biggest players in property and construction have been significant Conservative funders, especially since Boris Johnson became prime minister.

Malcolm and Eddie Healey – dubbed “East Yorkshire’s richest men” in the local press -have donated £1.1 million to the Conservatives between them since July.

Billionaire property developer Tony Gallagher gave the Conservatives almost three-quarters of a million pounds through his company Countywide Developments Ltd. A long-time Tory donor, Gallagher hosted David Cameron’s fiftieth birthday party at his Oxfordshire mansion in 2016.

Bridgemere UK, a property company chaired by one Steve Morgan, donated £1 million less than two weeks before Johnson won what he called a “stonking” majority in December’s general election. Morgan, who sold Wolverhampton Wanderers in 2016, retains a £245.6 million holding in house builder Redrow, according to The Sunday Times Rich List 2020.

Construction tycoon John Bloor – whose Bloor Homes did well from the Conservatives’ Help to Buy scheme – gave the Tory party £962,000 since July, through his company J.S. Bloor (Services) Ltd. The Solihull-based IM Group, founded by retired Tory peer Lord Edmiston, donated £388,000, much of it going to Tory candidates who took seats in Labour’s so-called ‘red wall’.

“It is entirely wrong that those with money can gain access to politicians that puts their interests above the rest of us”

Elsewhere, 33-year-old Mayfair property tycoon Jamie Reuben has donated £586,250.00 to the Tories since Boris Johnson became party leader. The Queen’s Park Rangers director, who is also heir to a huge family fortune, made donations only to Johnson himself in the previous year, amounting to £50,000.

The Conservatives’ top ten property donors gave more than £5.7million to the party since last July – compared to just £1.5million in the final twelve months of Theresa May’s premiership.

Other major Tory donors with major interests in property include John Beckwith, who gave a quarter of a million pounds to the Conservatives last year, Richard Caring, who gave over £217,000, and developer Jeremy Knight-Adams, who donated £100,000, as did hotelier Lord Rocco Forte.

New money

openDemocracy’s analysis found a number of figures linked to the property sector have emerged as Conservative donors for the first time over the past year.

Adeyheath Limited has given £260,000 since August. The property firm is controlled by Berish Berger, who is the director of more than 130 companies including the London-based Greaterheaven and Makepeace Investments.

In November, a company called Conegate Limited donated £75,000 to the Conservatives. It is ultimately controlled by West Ham United owner David Sullivan. As mayor of London, Boris Johnson was heavily criticised for his role in the deal that saw West Ham take over the Olympic stadium. The deal is estimated to have cost taxpayers in excess of £300 million.

In March, the Conservatives received £100,000 from luxury property developer Nick Candy. In 2016 a former business partner accused Nick Candy and his brother Christian of tax evasion. The brothers won the case in the high court but the judge remarked that “none of the protagonists emerge from this trial with great credit”.

The Conservatives have also received almost £25,000 from Bruce Ritchie. The founder of Residential Land was the co-chair of the controversial President’s Club, which was heavily criticised in 2018 after it emerged that young women at the men-only event were allegedly propositioned for sex and asked to wear skimpy clothes and sign non-disclosure agreements.

Property tycoon Christopher Moran gave the Conservatives £8,500 in January, his first donation since 2017. Moran – who flew Boris Johnson back from a DUP fundraiser on his private jet in 2018 – has been accused of turning a blind eye to sex workers in a Chelsea building he owns. (Moran denied any knowledge of the situation.)

Among other donors linked to the property sector are a number involved in care homes. Hampshire’s Churchill Retirement Living – a leading provider of homes to the over-sixties – gave £150,000.

The median value – the mid-point in the ranking – of a donation from the property sector to the Conservatives was £95,744.

But the party also received dozens of often smaller donations from companies with little obvious footprint that are registered at Companies House as being involved in property or real estate. The cumulative value of these donations runs into hundreds of thousands of pounds.

‘Beholden’

Steve Goodrich, senior research manager at Transparency International, said: “When political parties become heavily reliant on a small number of big donors it creates the perception, and quite possibly the reality, they are beholden to narrow sectional interests.

“Our research has found there’s a deep public suspicion that those with the deepest pockets wield outsized and undue influence over decision-making in Westminster.”

Reacting to openDemocracy’s findings, the Scottish National Party MP Martin Docherty-Hughes accused the Conservatives of being “in hock” to wealthy donors.

“This is yet more evidence of the dependence of the Conservatives on rich backers that will only increase concerns about ‘cash-for-access’ in British politics. What do these donors get for their money? Surely the public has a right to know?”

Docherty-Hughes criticised Boris Johnson for refusing to release a report into Russian interference in British politics that is widely expected to name a number of Tory party donors with links to the Kremlin who have stepped up their donations in recent years.

“I thought when the Tories delayed publication of the Russia report it was because they wanted to avoid the embarrassment of showing the extent to which Russian oligarchs had infiltrated the Conservative Party.

“Now I’m beginning to wonder if it is because they don’t want comparisons drawn with their own increasingly oligarchic way of governing, where normal planning laws are for the little people and the rich get to the front of the queue,” Docherty-Hughes said.

When asked by openDemocracy about previous donations, a Conservative Party spokesperson said: “All reportable donations are properly and transparently declared to the Electoral Commission, published by them, and comply fully with the law.”

This piece was edited on June 29 to include updated figures from the Electoral Commission.

Village wants to become down-sizing haven for elderly residents

A plan that aims to preserve one of East Devon’s most rural parishes as a special place to live, work and visit has been unveiled.

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com.

The parish of Dalwood, which lies entirely within the southern boundary of the Blackdown Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, is approximately midway between the market towns of Axminster and Honiton.

Home to around 380 residents in 196 households, the parish is very rural, with predominant activities being arable and livestock farming, while the character of the village is a mixture of old and new with several modern residences either side of the road that runs through the village, with a historic core formed by a church, adjacent cottages and a public house on the opposite side of the road.

The Corry Brook runs to the east of these buildings providing an attractive green corridor through the heart of the village and greatly enhancing the settlement’s rural character.

Residents of the parish have come together to put forward a Neighbourhood Plan which aims to protect, preserve and enhance the qualities of the community and this part of the Blackdown Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

The plan sets out 17 aims as to how it aims to achieve the vision statement which is that Dalwood is a vibrant, active and friendly community that is a special place to live, work and visit.

The aims are:

  • Protect and enhance the natural environment, including the distinctive landscape and ecology.
  • Protect the tranquillity of the environment and maintain the dark skies.
  • Ensure that all new development is sympathetic to the traditional character, materials and style to retain the distinctive character of the village.
  • Protect the area’s heritage sites and locations. Housing and Population Aim
  • Support new local housing development which respects the characteristics and constraints of Dalwood’s built and natural environment, yet allows continual evolution of the Parish.
  • Preserve the overall character of the Parish’s settlements within the AONB.
  • Encourage retail and/or hospitality development that meets local and visitors’ needs.
  • Resist the loss of local facilities and amenities (including St Peter’s Church, Methodist Chapel, Community Shop and Post Office, Village Hall, Pavilion, Jubilee Field, Pub and protect Assets of Community Value (ACV’s).
  • Seek ways to minimise parking problems in the village when development is proposed. Improve parking provision.
  • Maintain and enhance a network of public rights of way and bridleways.
  • Help create, support and sustain local businesses
  • Improve broadband connectivity. Any future developments aim to improve connectivity.
  • Ensure new builds provide sustainable broadband connectivity.
  • Help to sustain arable and livestock farming life-styles
  • Support small scale, unobtrusive renewable or low carbon energy schemes providing they are sensitively sited and screened, i.e. appropriately landscaped.
  • Support a provider or village initiative to come forward with card access electric vehicle charging points.
  • Increase recycling levels via a generic supporting policy.
Dalwood community shop and post office

Dalwood community shop and post office (Image: Roger Cornfoot/Geograph)

The plan says: “Dalwood is a rural parish nestled in the Blackdown Hills AONB. The parish itself has little through traffic. It is an example of a tranquil, beautiful and special rural Devon landscape rich with wildlife. The distinctive quality of the parish is a characteristic highly valued by the residents and it is one of the reasons people chose to live here.

“This applies to those who have moved into the village and those who have grown up here and stayed or moved away and returned, and the aims and objectives reflect the desire to protect the valuable and high-quality natural environment of the parish.

“Dalwood village is characterised by an historic core. Roads to the village are narrow, often single track and flanked by traditional Devon banks or hedges. While there is no public transport available, anyone without a car is reliant on community transport such as ‘Ring and Ride’, Trips Community Transport Association, or lifts from others to access facilities not available in the village.

“The village benefits from a Village Hall, children’s nursery, two churches, a community shop and the Jubilee Pavilion and Field with children’s playing area. Much of the local employment in the parish is naturally based on farming activity, and it is important to understand the characteristics of the village as they inform the suitability or not of locating new development there, and to what scale and type. The Local Plan does not consider Dalwood as suitable to sustain further development due to its limited range of services and facilities.”

The community questionnaire identified a preference for housing developments to take place only if local need is established and for them to come forward within a ‘settlement boundary’, but it also highlighted a need for smaller homes for existing residents to downsize and remain in the village.

The plan looks favourably upon new housing developments which meet parish needs and/or support the ageing population as well as young families, as well as supporting the provision of housing through the demonstration of small-scale local needs on exception sites in Dalwood

It says: “There is a preference for appropriate development to fit within the landscape, without having adverse impacts on its surrounding landscape and the natural and built character of the area within which the proposal is located.

“However, in some cases, it may be acceptable for appropriate landscaping to play a role as part of the solution to ensure that there is no adverse impact on the setting of the proposal. Where the use of planting is an appropriate part of that solution, native local species of plants should be used, such as hawthorn, blackthorn, ash, oak or beech

“Development proposals will only be supported where the development does not result in adverse impacts on the natural environment (landscape and biodiversity), and they enhance the natural environment, where there is the opportunity to do so.

“To ensure that new housing development is of high-quality design and sympathetic to the traditional built character of the parish, proposals will be supported where they take fully into account the Blackdown Hills AONB Design Guide for Houses, and ensure that the size, scale and location of the development is appropriate to the form, scale and setting of the existing built environment.

“Housing development will be supported within the settlement boundary where development is of a scale and appearance in keeping with surrounding properties and the character of the village, local amenity is not impacted and there is provision for sufficient off-street parking, meeting current adopted parking standards and exceeding them where feasible.”

The plan also adds that the aim for the village is to maintain and increase, not decrease, the range of facilities that serve the local community, and that the community will oppose any proposal that results in a loss of such facilities.

The plan aims to support applications for retail or hospitality businesses that are in keeping with the character of the area, although any development would need to demonstrate that it would not have any significant adverse impact on the existing state of the natural environment and support the sensitive and necessary maintenance and improvement of local facilities and amenities.

Fields at Dalwood lane - View south across the steep pasture fields towards the village of Dalwood whose houses are just visible in the early morning sun

Fields at Dalwood lane – View south across the steep pasture fields towards the village of Dalwood whose houses are just visible in the early morning sun (Image: Nigel Mykura/Geograph)

And as Dalwood Parish is served by a network of narrow lanes typical of rural East Devon and the Blackdown Hills, and that residents are very car-dependent with there being no bus service – the nearest public bus service a 35-minute walk from the village – the improvement and enhancement of public rights of way will be supported.

Schemes will be supported where they promote, protect, maintain and enhance the existing local footpath and bridleway network for use on foot, bicycle or horseback, they improve and enhance the existing network through the provision of new or extended routes, and they prevent motorised vehicles illegally using designated footpaths, bridleways and cycleways.

The parish council also aims to work with the local community in the development of a recycling collection area, which is properly screened and managed providing there is no significant adverse impact on the area.

Dalwood Parish Council has now submitted their Neighbourhood Plan to East Devon District Council, and residents can now have their say in a consultation on the plan, which runs until Wednesday, June 30, 2021.

The plan sets out policies for the future of Dalwood parish, which will be used to help inform future decisions about development and planning applications in the area for the next ten years and beyond.

The Dalwood Neighbourhood Plan has been in production since 2016 and covers a variety of topics including the natural, built and historic environment, housing, economy and employment, transport and access, community facilities and services, and energy/low carbon, waste and plastic.

After the consultation, the plan will go before an independent examiner, who will inspect the plan against a series of ‘basic conditions’ that the plan must meet

If the examiner is happy the plan meets the requirements then it can proceed to a local community referendum. If more than half of the electors vote in favour of the plan it will be adopted and will become part of the statutory development plan for East Devon.

Once adopted, the plan will be used to help inform future decisions about development and planning applications in the Dalwood area.

The plan and all supporting documents are now on the EDDC website at https://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/3722605/dalwood-np-submission-version-05-03-21.pdf, along with a comments form for residents and interested parties to share their views.

Anyone wishing to comment should send their comments by email to planningpolicy@eastdevon.gov.uk, or by post to Angela King, Planning Policy Team, East Devon District Council, Blackdown House, Border Road, Honiton, EX14 1EJ.

East Devon swaps seasonal displays for permanent plants and flowers

Seasonal flower displays in East Devon parks and green spaces are being scrapped in favour of wildlife-attracting blooms and plants that will return year-on-year.

eastdevonnews.co.uk 

The district council is sowing seeds of change in the way it manages beauty spots in a bid to be more environmentally-friendly.

Plans involve a reduction in seasonal bedding displays to include more permanent planting designs.

East Devon District Council (EDDC) says it is on a mission to take ‘positive steps’ to reduce its carbon footprint, utilise resources more sustainably and increase biodiversity.

The authority added that a cold and dry spring has meant newly-planted beds are looking ‘less full’ – but will flourish as the weather warms.

An EDDC spokesperson added: “Our mission is to provide more sustainable planting that gives year-round interest and colour but lessens the impact on our planet.

“This action is a small but important part of our work to help meet our climate change action plan as part of signing up to the Devon Climate Emergency.

“We really hope everybody gets on board and supports a greener East Devon.

“We understand this won’t be to everyone’s taste, however, we have had a real buzz around this; on-site whilst we have been planting out the interest from the public has been really high.

“Many people now seem to understand the need to think about sustainability, the way we look after our planet and the importance of providing habitat as well as year round interest in our beds, many of which were often bare in the autumn/winter months.

“This is a new venture for us, and we would urge the public to hold their judgement until the beds are fully established. We will continuously review the success, adding colour and interest.”

EDDC says there are a number of reasons why it has changed its approach:

  • Permanent planting will help to create mini eco systems and habitat for bugs, bees and birds to flourish;
  • Plants will be selected to provide nectar, essential to our pollinators to thrive and survive;
  • Plants will be selected on their drought tolerance and suitability to the endemic environment but also their wonderful flowers, form, texture or scent;
  • Planting can be divided and recycled in future seasons – less plastic pots and trays;
  • Reduced cultivation of the beds allows earth worms and mycorrhizal fungi to flourish – big buddies of plant life.

The council says it is reducing its traditional bedding displays because:

  • Bedding plants are intensively produced and provide a monoculture environment which doesn’t allow wildlife to flourish;
  • They don’t attract enough pollinators essential to biodiversity;
  • They are single-use and are thrown away at the end of their short life. There is a seismic shift to move way from single use products for good reason;
  • They require intensive watering which is an unnecessary waste of natural resource;
  • The constant digging over of the beds disturbs the natural soil culture.

Councillor Denise Bickley, EDDC’s assistant portfolio holder climate action and emergencies, said:

“I am delighted to totally support this change in policy.

“We must do all we can to help the planet recover, by doing the most we can in our own area.

“This is a win on so many levels – helping biodiversity, reducing plastic waste and transport pollution, allowing soil quality to improve, reducing inadvertent damage to peatbogs just for starters – and we can all benefit from learning from the gardening skills it takes to enable a healthy native, perennial display, as oppose to easy wins earns from planting more ‘showy’ annuals.

“I look forward to seeing these displays mature and thrive.”

Public consultation to increase Exmouth Community College capacity begins

Exmouth Community College is proposing at the request of Devon County Council to have its current capacity increased from 2,418 pupils to 2,650.

Will Goddard exmouth.nub.news 

Image: Exmouth Community College. Credit: Simon Cobb

Exmouth Community College. Credit: Simon Cobb

The college is a secondary academy trust for ages 11-18.

The proposal is a 9% increase on the current number of students, and was prompted by East Devon District Council’s plan for more housing development in Exmouth – and Devon County Council’s responsibility to provide school places for all children in the county.

To accommodate the extra students, an eight-classroom extension has been proposed for the Maths Block at the site at Gipsy Lane. Detailed plans are available on the college’s website.

Devon County Council and East Devon District Council will fund the extension.

For more information, members of the public can access the full consultation document here.

If you would like to respond to this consultation, you can email consultation@exmouthcollege.devon.sch.uk or write to the following address:

Consultation on changes to provision

Exmouth Community College

Gipsy Lane

Exmouth

EX8 3AF

The closing date for responses is 5pm on Wednesday 23 June 2021.

30-point plan to help seaside town thrive for future generations

A plan to preserve the picturesque seaside town of Teignmouth but to have a sustainable future is out for consultation.

Daniel Clark (extract) www.devonlive.com

The Teignmouth Neighbourhood Plan, which aims to provide a vision for the town for the next 20 years, outlines how the residents wish to ensure it remains a thriving town with a healthy and unpolluted environment, set in a protected coastal and estuarine setting.

There are 30 aims listed in the plan concerning topics ranging from housing, the future of the town centre, sport and leisure provision, traffic and parking, and flood prevention, with a ‘golden thread’ of climate change running throughout all the policies listed.

Cllr Joan Atkins, chairman of the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, in the foreword to the plan, said: “On the surface Teignmouth is a picturesque seaside town in South Devon, but underneath that first impression, it is far more than that. It is a complex town with a long history and many facets and styles which have been moulded by the hands of time, fashions in design and the topography and limitations of its location

“We very much hope and intend that this will facilitate appropriate future development in the town, taking into account a response to climate change, requirements of heritage conservation and, most recently, the impact and response required by the Pandemic.

“We will never be able to please all the people all the time, particularly as the goalposts keep moving, but we hope we have produced a balanced, even aspirational view after our many discussions, within the many limitations of what we can legally achieve through a Neighbourhood Plan.”

The vision statement says: “In 2040 Teignmouth will be a sustainable, thriving town with a healthy and unpolluted environment, set in a protected coastal and estuarine setting. It will have a high-quality public realm with all new developments meeting high standards of design and sustainability, good community, sports and recreational facilities for all ages and abilities, a diverse economy with opportunities to work from home or in business including the port, retail, tourism, leisure, art, and culture, and, good transport facilities for pedestrians, cyclists, buses, road vehicles, railways and parking.”

THE 30 AIMS OF THE TEIGNMOUTH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN

  • The historic environment should be recognised and appropriately protected and enhanced.
  • New development should have a beneficial impact on the character and sustainability of the area and respond positively to the challenges of climate change.
  • Improve and maintain the public realm.
  • Provide more green space, play areas, trees and community horticulture opportunities in residential areas for reasons of health, amenity, quality of public realm and a response to climate change.
  • New development proposals should prove their sustainability credentials.
  • The rate of housing growth should be moderate and must not put a strain on local infrastructure.
  • New housing provision should address Teignmouth’s evidenced needs.
  • The impact of new housing development on its location should be physically, aesthetically and socially beneficial and respond positively to the challenges of climate change.
  • Local green spaces that contribute to the amenity of their local area should be protected
  • Sports, leisure and recreation facilities should be sufficient in quantity and quality to meet evidenced community needs.
  • Encourage recreational activity appropriate to the outstanding geographical location.
  • Local community facilities should be sufficient in quantity and quality to continue to meet community needs.
  • Opportunities for young people should be adequately addressed.
  • Ensure the local provision of quality education opportunities for all.
  • The town centre must remain the commercial and social heart of the area.
  • Continue to improve the appearance and amenity of the town centre and seafront.
  • Arts and cultural projects should be welcomed and promoted.
  • Appropriate improvements and enhancements to tourism facilities should be welcomed and encouraged.
  • Sustainable tourism development should be encouraged and actively pursued.
  • Sustainable transport modes should be encouraged and better facilitated.
  • The traffic & parking implications of new development should be fully recognised & addressed.
  • More parking should be provided.
  • Measures to address traffic problems and their implications should be introduced.
  • The countryside and natural coastal and estuarine areas should be safeguarded from the impact of development or over-use
  • Strategic gaps between settlement areas should be recognised and protected.
  • Public access to the countryside and coastline should be accommodated where it does not cause harm.
  • The sea wall, groynes and other coastal and estuarine flood defences will be protected.
  • Business development that is in keeping with and enhances the town’s distinctiveness should be accommodated.
  • Encourage development that offers good quality employment opportunities.
  • Appropriate community-based renewable and low carbon energy initiatives are welcomed.

Rather than try to design a single planning policy about climate change and how mitigation and adaptation measures can be supported, the authors of the plan have sought to “climate change proof” policies and community actions and projects, which means the response to the changing climate, is a “golden thread” running through the plan.

With Teignmouth being a coastal town partially reliant on tourism, issues relating to climate change that will need to be addressed and mitigated, the plan says, include rising sea levels and flood risk from high tides, including the impact on the seafront and resilience of the railway infrastructure, the potential impact of flood risk and a changing climate on the local economy, the impact on the retention of beaches, and, the impact of current levels of traffic on carbon dioxide emissions.

Royals, Saudi businessmen and the other people who own Dartmoor

Despite its familiarity, many of us still don’t know who’s land we are walking across when we visit the site.

Lili Stebbings www.devonlive.com

Dartmoor is one of the most famous national parks in the UK with its vast moor land making it perfect for long country walks.

Many of us have visited, some have even camped and of course the well-known annual Ten Tors takes place on its famous hills.

But despite its familiarity, many of us still don’t know who’s land we are walking across when we visit the site.

In actual fact 47 per cent of Dartmoor has 14 owners divided into a collection of families, businesses, royals and farmers. That’s 110,619 acres of its total 235,986.

So here’s who owns it:

Duchy of Cornwall

Starting with the largest owner of land is Duchy of Cornwall covering 67.274 acres spanning from part of Brent Moor in the south to Princetown leading west past Peter Tavy and up to Okehampton.

It first came about in 1337 after being founded by Edward III who honoured it as a private estate for his son, later becoming the first Duke of Cornwall.

Despite owning other areas of land around the country, this plot is the Duchy’s largest land possession.

The name of the estate is derived from the Earldom of Cornwall. Edward elevated the Estate to a Duchy and endowed it with lands, many of which remain in the estate’s possession today.

Lord Roborough’s Maristow Estate

The second biggest landowner of Dartmoor is the Maristow Estate to the west, owned by the Barons Roborough, the Lopes family who own 6,118 acres within the NP boundary and at least 11,500 acres in total.

The Maristow Estate was first constructed in the early 19th century by Sir Manasseh Masseh Lopes, 1st baronet.

Included in the ownership of this land are the commons of Roborough Down, Walkhampton and Ditsworthy Warren, as well as woodlands near Bickleigh and parkland surrounding Maristow House.

National Trust

Canonteign Falls in the Teign Valley

The National Trust own the third biggest lot of 5,891 acres including various properties, with the largest being Hentor Warren, south Dartmoor, also woods at Holne and Teign Valley.

It also owns Dartmoor’s most beautiful river valleys and intriguing buildings, including Castle Drogo, which was the last castle to be built in England – a granite fortress come family home on a granite spur above Teign Valley.

South West Water

Land was acquired from Lord Roborough in the late 19th century by Plymouth Corporation – later becoming South West Water.

This came about after the growth of Plymouth during the 19th century which meant there was an increasing need for larger supplies of water.

During the search for a new water supply, negotiations between Plymouth Corporation, which was the municipal utility, and Lord Roborough, who owned the land were in full swing.

An agreement was eventually made and the reservoir and its surrounding catchment from Lord Roborough’s land now belongs to privatised water company South West Water.

Spitchwick Estate

Spitchwick Common (Image: Plymouth Herald)

This historic estate situated within the parish of Widecombe-in-the-Moor is owned by the Simpson family who purchased the land in 1934.

The family own 3,891 acres including the Spitchwick Commons and various woods and fields surrounding Spitchwick Manor House.

Later the family also acquired the 1,200-odd acres of Holne Chase and Holne House.

Dartmoor National Park Authority

After Dartmoor was developed into uses for those such as utilities, foresters and the military during the 20th century, two preservation charities the National Trust and, previous to it being named National Park in 1951, Dartmoor National Park Authority took over large parts of the land.

Dartmoor National Park Authority currently own 3,512 acres.

Ministry of Defence

A Royal Marines Commando during an exercise to rescue a stranded pilot during HMS Queen Elizabeth’s deployment in which F-35B Lightning jets landed on the aircraft carrier for the first time. This images was part of a winning selection for the Commandant General Royal Marines Prize won by HMS Queen Elizabeth. Picture by Leading Photographer Dan Shepherd

The Ministry of Defence own 3,343 acres of Dartmoor on freehold with their main possession being Willsworthy Range in which there is one of their two training camps.

The rest of the training area for the Royal Navy, Royal Marines, British Army, and Royal Air Force belongs to other landowners, including the Duchy of Cornwall, Maristow Estates and Southwest Water.

Forestry Commission

Bellever/Riddon Ridge on Dartmoor

Bellever/Riddon Ridge on Dartmoor

The forests are managed as part of the public forest estate which covers 3,278 acres. This stretches from Fernworthy in the north, three miles west of Chagford, through Soussons and Bellever, close to the village of Bellever, to Brimpts in the south and the Canonteign plantations.

The public forest is predominantly conifer having been planted after the First World War to address the national timber shortage by the Duchy of Cornwall.

Alexander Darwall

Stall Moor is owned by fund manager Alexander Darwall. He owns 2,784 acres of the land.

Stall Moor lies between the Yealm and Erme rivers of south Dartmoor.

Stonewood Ltd

Brent Moor is currently up for sale with Knight Frank – going at a price of £750,000. However despite being put up for sale, the 2,750 acre land is currently listed as being owned by Stonewood Ltd.

There has been said to be rumours that the moor is owned by Saudi businessman Sheikh Khalid bin Ibrahim Al Ibrahim, since the late 1980s.

But despite that, this part of the moor has been listed for sale twice before – once in 2002 for £300,000 and a second time 2011 for £600,000.

Hurrell family

Dartmoor

Ugborough Moor spanning 2,294 acres is owned by the Hurrell family. HG Hurrell was a noted Devon naturalist and acquired the moor. Henry George Hurrell was a well known naturalist and a most public spirited citizen of Plymouth and passed away on 23 May 1981.

When the Dartmoor National Park was designated in 1951 he was nominated by the Minister as one of the independent members of the Park Committee on which he served until 1972, twenty years of valuable public service.

Today, this part of the moor is still owned by his descendants.

Howell family

Harford Moor contains Piles Copse – one of the three fragments of upland oakwood on Dartmoor of which the Howell family have owned since the 1930s.

In 1867 the Duchy of Cornwall sold Harford and Higher and Lower Piles, to the Rivers family, who owned Stowford estate, which is the old manor of Harford.

Howard Howell bought both Harford Moor and Higher Piles from the MacAndrew executors in 1931, along with the Lukesland portion of the Harford estates.

The Stowford estate and the moor were bought by James MacAndrew in 1878 and Lower Piles was later sold on sometime between 1867 and 1929, and has remained in separate ownership.

After that time, the Piles farms had long been abandoned and the Higher Piles boundaries were no longer stock proof.

Both Harford Moor and Higher Piles have stayed in the family since. Brian Howell was the legal owner of the 1,978 acre land from 1966 until his death in 2003, when it passed to John Howell.

Treneer family

The Treneer family own 1,138 acres across Dean moor which was excavated between 1954 and 1956.

Russell Ashford

Russell Ashford is Chairman of the Hill Farm Project Steering Group and as well as being a land owner of 848 acres of the Buckfastleigh Moor, he is also a grazier and advocate for the industry and the vital role upland farming plays on Dartmoor.

Boris Johnson’s legacy could be the concreting over of England

When we consider the likely effects of Boris Johnson’s administration over the next three years, and possibly beyond, it is easy to believe his achievements will be near or less than zero.

Phillip Inman www.theguardian.com 

Looking back to his time as mayor of London, he wasted most of his first term dealing with arguments among his close lieutenants before procrastinating about which of his limited set of manifesto pledges he would implement. Only in his second term did he press ahead with the capital’s cycle superhighways – for many people his only visible achievement.

Yet taking a narrow view of his time as mayor would be a mistake. The skyline across London changed hugely during his tenure and much of Britain could follow suit with him at the helm in No 10.

It doesn’t matter that he spends his time dozing while he holds the tiller, or distracting himself with designer wallpaper. The winners in the battle to be his lieutenants can be trusted to get on with the job – which includes a particular form of wealth creation based on property.

It is not surprising that the scandals affecting the Johnson administration – setting aside his own personal troubles over flat refurbishments and a subsidised holiday in the Caribbean, and the vast scale of corruption affecting the purchase of PPE and other essentials at the beginning of the pandemic – involve property deals.

The housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, approved a £1bn development in east London that shadow communities minister Steve Reed said had saved the former pornographer and property tycoon Richard Desmond £150m in tax and contributions to local amenities.

Reed connected the alleged agreement between Jenrick and Desmond, as many others did, with a modest £12,500 donation by Desmond to the Tory party a few days later.

It’s true that Jenrick was always going to bump into property developers at dinners and party gatherings; what is disturbing is how he fits in a pattern of behaviour that runs through the Johnson administration.

Edward Udny-Lister is another closely tied to Johnson’s coat tails. The former leader of Wandsworth council became chief of staff towards the end of Johnson’s first term as mayor and rejoined him as chief strategic adviser in Downing Street. Late last year he took over as chief of staff at No 10 following the departure of Dominic Cummings.

Property developers were never far away from City Hall and, to Londoners, it would seem construction projects were approved almost daily. The city is a sea of towers, most of them foreign owned and built without any requirement for affordable homes to be included.

An investigation by the Guardian found that several firms that succeeded in getting planning permission in London donated almost £1m to the Conservative party after Johnson became PM.

Lord Udny-Lister recently stepped down from his latest role as an envoy to the Gulf states after apologising for his failure to declare a conflict of interest that occurred when he approved a £187m loan underwritten by the taxpayer for a property developer he was being paid to advise.

An earlier investigation by the Times found that he was paid almost £500,000 by the Malaysian property company EcoWorld between 2016 and 2019 while he was also chair of Homes England, the housing authority charged with funding affordable homes.

To say that Britain is a giant property whirligig spun for the benefit of a closed group of Conservative party supporters is possibly overstating the makeup of the economy and its dependence on real-estate values.

But when so many agencies of the state have found their main job is to keep the housing market spinning, surely it is not such an exaggeration.

The Bank of England says it keeps interest rates at near zero to support small- and medium-sized businesses and the broader economy. But in truth it worries more about a fall in property prices, such is the power of a collapsing housing market to destroy consumer confidence and the balance sheets of high street mortgage lenders.

Huge numbers of baby boomers now own their homes outright and see the value of their property as a barometer of their lifetime achievement as much as a vehicle for inheritance.

Many of them like the view from their homes and refuse to sanction planning applications near where they live. Once called Nimbys – “not in my back yard” – for their disapproval of development in general, they are now the main target of this Tory obsession with property.

A new planning law will strip them of their right to question planning applications once areas are targeted for expansion.

Older Nimbys are already casting themselves as environmentalists in this new conflict. And good luck to them. The green agenda is a legitimate way to fight back.

Development News Part 4 – Judge slams door on beauty spot homes (given permission by Cornwall Unitary Authority)

“This judgment has far-reaching implications for the protection of AONBs in Cornwall and beyond. It means that private ‘need’ alone would not in itself justify developments inside an AONB. It re-asserts the critical importance of the protective umbrella that the AONB offers when it comes to developments.”

Ben Webster, Environment Editor www.thetimes.co.uk

A farmer’s plan to build a dream home on Cornwall’s coast has been thwarted by a High Court ruling that could help to protect other scenic areas.

Mrs Justice Tipples quashed Cornwall council’s decision to grant Chris Wilton planning permission for the home with 27 windows, up to six bedrooms, three bathrooms, a wraparound balcony and detached double garage.

The Rame Protection Group, which challenged the approval of the home overlooking Whitsand Bay on Rame Head in the Cornwall area of outstanding natural beauty (AONB), said the ruling would help to protect other AONBs across the country from similar development.

Wilton, who was chairman of the parish council when permission was granted but lost his seat this month, had argued that he needed to build an “agricultural worker’s dwelling”. The parish council expressed support for his application. Wilton denied being involved in gaining the support of the parish council, which said its decision had been “unbiased”. [Owl emphasis]

County councillors voted seven to six to approve the home despite the AONB officer and the council’s principal planning officer recommending refusal because of the negative impact on the protected landscape.

The group said Rame Head was “valued for its breathtaking scenery and tranquillity” and argued at the High Court that Cornwall council had breached its duty to provide adequate reasons for its decision not to follow officer recommendations. It also argued that the council had failed to consider the extent to which the development accorded with the AONB management plan. Mrs Justice Tipples said in her ruling: “This is a case where the defects in reasons go to the heart of the justification for permission and undermine its validity.”

She said that a planning policy that allowed development when there was “essential need” was insufficient to justify granting permission for building in an AONB. She added: “One is completely in the dark as to why the [planning] committee thought the social and economic benefits of the proposed development outweighed the landscape harm. No reasons at all are provided.”

The Rame Protection Group said: “This judgment has far-reaching implications for the protection of AONBs in Cornwall and beyond. It means that private ‘need’ alone would not in itself justify developments inside an AONB. It re-asserts the critical importance of the protective umbrella that the AONB offers when it comes to developments.

“It is the group’s hope that this will help prevent similar attempts to undermine protective legislation throughout the county and beyond.”

Cornwall council said it would review the judgment and consider its options.

Development News 3 – Development Row in South Hams

Kingsbridge development row: Council seeks court hearing

(Would this happen in EDDC? – Owl)

www.bbc.co.uk

A council is taking a developer to court over claims it has breached a notice ordering site work to stop.

South Hams District Council in Devon claims work started “before it was allowed to” in Kingsbridge.

Police have been called to the site at Lock’s Hill as tensions between local residents and the developer have risen.

Housing developers Blakesley Estates said the stop notice was “redundant” because the work being done did “not represent” a start to construction.

Planning permission for 32 homes at Lock’s Hill was granted by South Hams District Council (SHDC) in December 2020.

The notice issued by SHDC on 14 May said “pre-commencement conditions include the requirement of a scheme for the protection of retained trees”.

Judy Pearce, leader of SHDC, said: “The temporary stop notice was issued because the developer had started work before it was allowed to do so under the planning permission.

“It was also the case that the works that it had carried out were causing significant environmental damage.”

Ms Pearce said the council was gathering evidence to “prosecute the developer and all those not complying with the notice”.

Development site

Blakesley Estates says it had advised the council trial pits and fencing work would be happening

Blakesley Estates said it had previously made SHDC aware of preliminary works that would be carried out that required temporary fencing.

In a statement the developer said the fencing had been vandalised and it was working to make the area safe “before this cessation can commence”.

The statement said: “Where building operations are stopped, allowance should be made for any work necessary to make the site safe.”

The developers also claimed some of their staff had been threatened.

The statement said: “Terms such as ‘ecocide’ and our lack of regard for the environment is a narrative being perpetuated in order to generate angst in the local community by those who wish work would not commence on the site.”

Stop notice

The council issued a temporary stop notice for 28 days

Dan Sathers who founded the Save Lock’s Hill group said he was feeling “emotional” seeing the hill being dug up.

“During lockdown people rediscovered it again…it became so important during a very difficult time.”

He told the BBC the site was full of birdsong, bats and slow worms and is calling for ecological surveys to be done again.

Lesley Hurrell who lives nearby said: “We never thought this would happen.”

She said she hoped action against the developers “will make them understand they cannot ride roughshod over us all”.

In a statement Kingsbridge Police said they were “very aware of the community feeling” but it was a civil matter and would not be dealt with by police.

A spokesman said officers attended the scene to gather evidence and “prevent any breach of the peace”.

Development News Part 2 – They do things differently in Bolton

Five £1m luxury mansions to be demolished after long-running planning dispute

Ellen Manning uk.news.yahoo.com 

Five million pound mansions will have to be demolished after a lengthy planning wrangle. (SWNS)

Five luxury mansions worth over £1m each have been ordered to be demolished following a long-running planning row about their size and location.

The six-bedroomed properties built in the West Pennine moors, Great Manchester were found to have been built up to a third bigger and in different locations than they were given permission for, a planning inquiry heard.

Owners had appealed against an order to demolish the houses but their claims were rejected and a planning inspector has now given them 12 months to demolish the structures and return the site to its previous state.

Four of the properties have been built up to a third bigger than planning permission allowed. (SWNS)

Building work on the development started in 2014 when planning permission was granted for the conversion of a former farmhouse and four new homes around a central courtyard near Bolton, Greater Manchester.

Work was put on hold after a complaint was filed in October 2016 and Bolton Council found the houses were not being built in line with planning permission.

The inquiry heard that found of the plots were up to a third bigger than were allowed and some were also in different places than the permission allowed.

The local authority first issued an enforcement notice to developers Sparkle Developments to tear down the houses in 2018.

Developers had appealed against the order to demolish the properties. (SWNS)

They appealed, saying the order to demolish the homes was excessive and too harsh to remedy any breach in planning regulations.

But their appeals were dismissed this week, with planning bosses ordering that the houses be demolished.

The owners now have 12 months to demolish the properties – extended from six months due to the “hardship” that the decision will bring to them.

At the inquiry, Bolton Council argued that the location of the houses represented a “significant departure away from the clear design intentions of the 2014 scheme” and that harm had been caused to green belt land.

The council’s barrister Ian Ponter said: “The appeal schemes generate a very substantial loss of openness.

“The character of the area is scattered farms, individual rural houses and groups of houses clustered into small villages located below the uplands.

“The original plans were expressly designed to be compatible with that settlement pattern.

“They were sensitively sited in a hamlet form of development.”

Development News Part 1 – Profit before planet

Profit before planet – developers duck opportunity to reduce carbon footprint

Councils serving the South West Exeter area have been forced to shelve an innovative district heating system designed to cut carbon emissions and reduce heating costs for future residents because most developers are unwilling to absorb any of the additional costs.

wearesouthdevon.com

Although house prices have risen by £25,000 per plot in Teignbridge over the past year, the majority of housebuilders involved in the proposed development to the South West of Exeter were not prepared to contemplate an additional £2,000 a plot in potential development costs, despite the scheme benefits of a 70% cut in carbon emissions compared with natural gas fired boilers.

Announced earlier this year, the carbon cutting heating system which would have used heat already being generated from waste, was supported by a consortium including Teignbridge District Council, Exeter City Council and Devon County Council. Due to the benefits of tackling climate change, the £23 million project would have been backed by the three councils with up to £7.3 million capital investment funding – the equivalent to £3,000 a plot.

In addition, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) offered an additional £9 million through a mixture of loans and grants to support the scheme.

The scheme for 2,500 new homes, shops, community facilities and a new school campus near Exminster would have taken heat from the nearby Viridor Exeter Energy Recovery Facility at Marsh Barton and was supported by BEIS.

Annual carbon savings of 2,500 tonnes would have been secured by the scheme as well as lower energy costs for those who bought the new homes. The scheme was in line with the Government’s commitment to ending the use of fossil fuel heating systems.

In addition to the £7.3m contribution, Teignbridge was prepared to make a £50,000 advance payment for preliminary infrastructure.

Although smaller developers such as locally based Cavanna Homes demonstrated its green credentials by being prepared to support the scheme, the lack of sufficient housebuilder support means that the development, which has historic planning permission, is likely to go ahead with less energy efficient heating systems.

Teignbridge will continue to apply its approved carbon reduction policies and will need to approve plans prepared by the developers but the resulting emissions savings will not come close to the benefits of the district heating network.

Teignbridge Council leader and local County Councillor, Cllr Alan Connett said he was deeply disappointed that an impasse had been reached. “It seems to me that the developers are out of step with the public mood which understands the importance of doing everything we can to tackle climate change. Their actions do not seem to reflect the commitments in their annual reports to deliver low carbon developments.

“Sadly it seems that despite huge increases in returns over the past year due to the housing boom, many developers have taken a short sighted view, preferring to maximise profit before cutting carbon emissions and protecting the planet for future generations.

“We would have invested £3,000 a plot to achieve this fantastic carbon cutting scheme but the developers will not meet us even part way. Their decision makes it worse for the climate and future residents will also likely face higher heating bills as a result of this decision.”

Cllr Connett praised the organisations who had been involved in the project for their support of a common cause of providing high quality housing with low carbon, efficient heating.

Cllr John Hart, Leader Elect of Devon County Council, which is responsible for the Energy Recovery Facility site, said: “It is very disappointing that this scheme, to include the district heating system, is not going ahead because it would so clearly help address the Devon climate emergency. I am extremely keen to make use of the surplus heat from the waste to energy plant, and hope to see it being used in future housing projects.”

Derriford Emergency Department ‘not fit for purpose’

Johnny Mercer has vowed to march on campaigning for new state of the art facilities at Derriford Hospital after an official warning was placed over its under strain Emergency Department.

Eve Watson. www.devonlive.com

The Moor View parliamentarian believes the CQC’s report exposing a number of issues concerning crowding and delays as ‘not helpful’ during the coronavirus pandemic and says he will do all he can to ensure Derriford gets a new Emergency Department by 2024 as well as a brand new hospital in later years.

His comments come as the UK’s health watchdog orders Plymouth University Hospitals NHS Trust to make urgent improvements after an inspection in March.

The former Veterans Minister said: “I’d just like to thank all the staff who’ve done an amazing job during this pandemic.

“I’m not sure why the CQC think a report like this is helpful at this time during a once-in-a-generation pandemic when we all know there are structural challenges at Derriford Hospital and the A&E (Emergency) department so I don’t see why that’s helpful.

“Personally I don’t think it’s helpful, and I’d just like to say a huge thank you to the staff because they’ve been struggling away in a department that’s not fit for purpose in a long time.”

When asked whether the NHS was suffering from lack of investment under the Conservative Government, he responded: “I think if you look at the figures, yes historically as a Conservative Government we haven’t invested enough in our NHS, that’s a fair criticism.

“I don’t think that can be levelled at the current administration, I think that we need to have grown up conversations around how we can sustain a health care system that is free to the point of need for those who need it.

“One of the answers is a big investment in infrastructure which I’ve committed to, Matt Hancock has committed to, the Prime Minister has committed to. I think everybody knows my views of those who don’t deliver their promises in politics.”

Meanwhile, Plymouth Sutton and Devonport Labour MP Luke Pollard said some ‘serious problems need to be addressed’.

He said: “I want to thank our NHS staff for working under incredibly tough circumstances throughout the pandemic. The CQC report identifies some problems, but it should also thank staff enough for going the extra mile and working their socks off. I have confidence in the team at Derriford to address the problems that have been identified.

“A decade of underfunding and fragmenting our NHS means there are some serious problems that need to be addressed. One of the most urgent issues is sorting out the crisis in primary care so everyone can see a GP locally. Derriford’s Emergency Department should be for emergencies but sadly too many Plymouth families are having to use it because they can’t access a doctor.

“I want to see NHS staff paid a decent pay rise not given the planned real terms pay cut by Ministers. It also means proper investment in our NHS and that is what I will continue to argue for.”

A report from the CQC, published yesterday, states Plymouth University Hospitals Trust has been informed of two breaches of legal requirements which “must be put right”.

Inspectors received information which led to concerns about “the safety and quality of the service”, and as a result gave the trust “around 30 minutes” notice before an inspection was carried out of the ED and diagnostic imaging services.

The trust said it has provided the CQC with “evidence of the immediate actions” it has already taken to address the concerns raised during the inspection.

It praised staff for their efforts during the global pandemic “to meet the needs of patients attending as emergencies, both with and without Covid-19”.

A Derriford spokesperson said the hospital appreciated the recognition.

The inspection, which focused purely on how safe, responsive and well-led the service was, found that there had been a deterioration in the quality of services being provided, which resulted in some rating changes.

The safety of this service at Derriford Hospital was previously rated as requires improvement, but it is now inadequate; and where the service used to be good for being well-led, it is now rated as requires improvement.

The ‘Responsive’ category was not rated on this occasion so the previous rating of requires improvement remains. The overall rating for the urgent and emergency care service at Derriford Hospital remains as requires improvement.

CQC also looked at the diagnostic and imaging services in response to concerns about the safety and quality of the service, and to check on the progress of improvements made following a previous inspection. During this focused inspection, CQC looked at how safe, effective and well-led the diagnostic imaging service at Derriford Hospital was.

Due to the narrow focus of the inspection, the overall rating for diagnostic imaging did not change and remains requires improvement.

During this part of the inspection, the CQC found staff “identified, responded to and removed or minimised risks to patients” and the service managed patient safety incidents “well”. It also found that staff felt “respected, supported and valued” and were focused on the needs of patients receiving care.

You can read the full report here.

Nature reserve announced for East Devon

A national nature reserve has been announced today (13 May) for the East Devon Pebbled Heaths near Exeter.

Announced by Natural England, the East Devon Pebblebed Heaths, stretching between the village of Woodbury towards Budleigh Salterton on the Jurassic Coast, is the latest site in the county to join the UK’s list of nationally and internationally important landscapes. 

Radio Exe News www.radioexe.co.uk

East Devon Pebblebed Heaths (courtesy: Jake Newman, Rekord Media)

Protects and establishes habitats, species, and geology

The Pebbled Heaths Conservation Trust is managed by the Devon Wildlife Trust and the RSPB – a new board under the chairmanship of Chris Woodruff, the manager of the East Devon Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Partnership, will guide and advise the partners in the management of the new NNR.    

Recognition of the 1,160 hectare site as a national nature reserve (NNR) both protects and establishes East Devon Pebblebed Heaths’ important habitats, species, and geology and provides an ‘outdoor laboratory’ for research.

The new NNR will make up a part of the wider Nature Recovery Network to significantly expand and connect wildlife-rich places to benefit people and nature. At the heart of the heaths is a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), and the site is also a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and a Special Protection Area (SPA).  

A biodiversity audit in 2016 documented more than 3,000 species across the range of habitats on the heaths – and more than 10% of these have been shown to have high conservation value. Among the key species which benefit from the habitats the heaths provide are Dartford warblers, nightjars, and the southern damselfly. 

Announcing the NNR, Natural England Chair Tony Juniper, said: 

“National Nature Reserves are the very jewels in nature’s crown. In addition to being among our most wonderful natural areas, they are also at the very heart of our ambition to create a Nature Recovery Network, to restore the beauty, diversity, and health of nature across the country. 

“The East Devon Pebblebed Heaths reserve offers wonderful opportunities for people to connect with nature, and to experience some wonderful wildlife, including 70 species of breeding birds and many unusual plants, insects, and reptiles. It is also an important archaeological site, set in a unique and evocative landscape. 

“Natural England is very proud to confirm the designation of East Devon Pebblebed Heaths and hope many more people will enjoy its wonderful natural riches.” 

Dr Sam Bridgewater, Head of Wildlife and Conservation for Clinton Devon Estates, said: 

“The heaths have been loved by generations of people and attract around 400,000 visits a year. As well as providing space for some of our rarest species, they play an important role in supporting mental and physical health and wellbeing, providing contact with nature and a place to exercise, socialise and enjoy.  

“Being granted National Nature Reserve status by Natural England is a recognition of the hard work not just of the staff of the three partner management organisations but the many volunteers who give so much of their time through groups such as the Friends of the Commons, all of which are invaluable.  

“This declaration also helps ensure the future of the heaths and their wildlife because National Nature Reserves benefit from the highest level of conservation protection available under UK legislation.” 

NNRs are designated by Natural England and are acknowledged as rare and precious areas which protect some of our country’s most important places for wildlife and geology.  

There are more than 200 NNRs in England with the first NNRs declared in the 1950s. Today NNRs showcase the best of conservation practice aimed at protecting habitat, wildlife, and geology alongside supporting research, education, and recreation where people can enjoy and engage with our shared heritage. 

Natural England to get 47% funding increase amid ‘green recovery’ plans

Owl will wait and see if it really happens. Can you rebuild lost teams of expertise overnight?

Patrick Barkham  www.theguardian.com 

Natural England, the government’s conservation watchdog, is to receive a 47% increase in government funding this year as its role expands to support a “green recovery” and provide environmental scrutiny of the government’s controversial “Project Speed”.

The dramatic funding increase is a boost for wildlife protection and monitoring after a decade of deep cuts which left the agency at “crisis point” and its chairman, Tony Juniper, admitting that it would struggle to reverse declines in biodiversity.

Natural England monitors and manages some of the country’s most wildlife-rich places, including sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs) and many nature reserves, also providing expert advice on the environmental impact of new homes, roads and other developments.

Juniper, the influential former Friends of the Earth campaigner who was appointed chair in 2019, said: “I am delighted to see the government backing nature recovery and giving us more of the tools we need to make a real difference and build back greener from the coronavirus pandemic. Natural England has big ambitions to establish a ‘nature recovery network’ and I believe our renewed focus and remit will help us to achieve this.”

The “nature recovery network,” a vision of landscape-scale restoration that joins up nature-rich places to better enable wild species to move through the countryside, was first mapped out in the government’s 25-year plan for the environment in 2018.

After a modest injection of an extra £15m last year, Natural England’s total budget for 2021-22 will rise to £198m, of which 90% is from Defra, plus £2.5m from other government departments and the remainder from fees, charges and external funding. Although a big increase from a low of £85.6m in 2019-20, its budget is still less than the £265m it received in 2008-09.

In its expanded role, Natural England will be a statutory consultee on the government’s “Project Speed” to accelerate infrastructure projects, an aspiration recently branded “an utter disaster” by conservationists.

Juniper told the Guardian that there was “a lot to do” to “join up the ambition to streamline the development process at the same time as achieving ‘nature recovery’” but that there was not necessarily a contradiction between these aspirations.

The forthcoming environment bill includes the requirement for all developments to provide a “net gain” in biodiversity, which Natural England will assess.

“Housing and infrastructure can be done in ways that are quite damaging [to nature] or in quite a good way. Our task at Natural England is to get these things as complementary as they can be,” he said. “If we can step back and have ecological thinking built into the planning process, that’s going to solve a lot of the problems before they emerge.”

The agency will also administer the new “nature for climate” peatland grant scheme and increase its work with farmers, helping Defra design the new environmental land management scheme (Elms). This post-Brexit support for farmers aims to provide “public money for public goods”, with farmers paid for environmental services such as flood alleviation and carbon sequestration in soils and trees.

Juniper, who has consistently argued for more government resources, said the increase was a “a very welcome outcome for this year” that would “put more capacity into the organisation”.

In 2019, he warned that the “massively depleted” agency could not adequately manage the “jewels in the crown” of English nature. The government missed its 2010 target to restore half of SSSIs to “favourable” condition by 2020, with more than 60% of the nature-rich sites in unfavourable condition, and more than half not monitored in six years or more due to the funding cuts.

Joan Edwards, director of policy and public affairs for the Wildlife Trusts, said: “This is a positive step in the right direction, but Natural England has suffered underfunding for years, which has had a significant effect on the work it needs to do for nature’s recovery.

“We hope that this is the first of a series of increases to Natural England’s budget, we are still one of the most nature depleted countries in the world. In the run-up to Cop26 we must show the world we mean business, tackling the twin nature and climate emergencies, and Natural England has a vital role to play.

“We still need to see significant increases in funding, for example, for work improving natural habitats at sea so that marine wildlife can flourish again, and sea habitats can store carbon once more.”

As the £840/roll wallpaper starts to peel off – Owl reflects on: “a week is a long time in politics”

[All these events have been widely reported]

A week ago Boris Johnson felt sufficiently confident in the success of the Government’ Covid strategy to concede a public inquiry.

The May elections boosted his confidence that he could win a general election in 2023 without having to worry about an inquiry that would not start work before 2022 and would not report until at least 2024.

Then:

 “I’m sick of it.” 

 Jenny McGee, St. Thomas’ nurse who treated Boris Johnson, resigned over low pay. 

“We’re not getting the respect and now pay that we deserve.”

“We’re All Going on a Summer Holiday”. Or are we?

Days of mixed messages about travel – Can you/can’t you? Should you/shouldn’t you? Does amber mean stop, go or don’t even think about it?

A couple of days ago:

Dominic Cummings tweeted in combative mood that the key to the pandemic was “fast hard effective action” to lock down. He dismissed any notion of there being a trade-off between lockdown and economic recovery. “This nonsense is STILL influencing policy, eg our joke borders policy.”

 Which naturally leads Owl to note:

The “Indian” variant of Covid-19 is becoming increasingly “significant” and, if it proves to be very much more infectious than the “British” variant, could derail Boris’ June 21 “Freedom Day” plans.

As Cummings says, Johnson has become complacent about the trade-off strategy. 

Yesterday:

The government has admitted that failings with the test and trace system led to a delay in hundreds being told they should have isolated after coming into contact with coronavirus,

The glitch meant local councils, including Blackburn with Darwen, were not given the full data on the number of positive tests in their area – which may have led to the current surge in numbers.

On Track and Trace :

Dido Harding’s test and trace system has swallowed up “unimaginable” amounts of taxpayers’ money with no evidence of any measurable difference on the progress of the coronavirus pandemic, a scathing report by a Westminster spending watchdog [the Public Accounts Committee] has found.

The report said NHS test and trace must “wean itself off” its reliance on private-sector consultants, after figures showed it was still employing around 2,500 in early February on an estimated daily rate of £1,100 a head – with the highest-paid individual costing taxpayers £6,624 a day. 

The March budget included an additional £15bn for test and trace, taking the total bill to more than £37bn over two years.

Next week:

Cummings is to give “explosive evidence” to the joint health and science select committee investigation on the handling of the pandemic next Wednesday. (He claims to have a “Smoking Gun”).

 Finally:

To cap it all, the £840/roll “gold” print wall paper is reported to have started to peel off the walls of the Downing Street flat.

The company states on its website that it does not offer refunds and advises customers to inspect deliveries before pasting its heavy-duty products to walls. “No claims for faulty fabrics or wallpapers can be made after the fabrics or wallpapers have been cut or hung,” the firm says. 

 So who foots the bill on this one?

Holmesley Care Home, Sidmouth, banned from taking new residents

A care home at the centre of a police inquiry over a Covid-19 outbreak has been banned from taking on any new residents.

www.bbc.co.uk

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) also downgraded the Holmesley Care Home in Sidmouth, Devon from good to inadequate on safety and leadership.

The CQC visited the home in February and March, days before an outbreak of Covid-19 which led to nine deaths.

Two people have been arrested on suspicion of wilful neglect.

The CQC said it had imposed conditions on the operation of the care home, preventing it from admitting new residents, or re-admitting former residents “without prior written agreement from the CQC”.

The care home “must also ensure that systems are in place to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19 to protect patients and staff”, said the CQC.

Amanda Stride, CQC’s head of adult social care, said: “When we inspected Holmesley Care Home, we found that people were not protected from the spread of infection.

“During the first day of our inspection we observed seven members of staff wearing face masks under their chin, or not at all.

“Soon afterwards, the care home experienced a widespread outbreak of Covid-19.

“As the circumstances which led to this are now subject to a police investigation, we are unable to comment further on this.”

She said inspectors found “widespread and significant shortfalls in the way in which the service was led”.

“Residents were at risk of neglect and abuse because systems to monitor the quality of care were either not in place, or not operating efficiently,” she said.

The CQC would “continue to monitor the service closely, in conjunction with the local authority, to ensure that improvements are made and fully embedded”.

It was also meeting managers “to discuss how they plan to make the required changes to improve their rating and we will re-inspect to check the improvements have been made”.