Another day in the High Court: PPE case update

Good Law Project  us15.campaign-archive.com /

Today the High Court heard our lawyers detail waste, mismanagement – and yet more special treatment for politically connected companies placed in the “VIP” Lane. 

Government paid tens of millions of pounds to PestFix and Ayanda Capital for face masks which did not meet NHS standards. An email from a senior official stated that they needed to “get out of a contract” due to “a failure of the commercial process…

PestFix was in the “VIP” lane because an ex-director was an old-school friend of a senior official’s father-in-law; Ayanda, because one of its senior advisers was a member of Government’s Board of Trade.

Government failed to carry out any proper checks before ordering gowns from PestFix. After examining the evidence, our lawyers told the Court: “over £100m spent on gowns with no technical assurance, no financial due diligence and based on a misunderstanding of the gowns which were actually being purchased.”

Government didn’t put its cards on the table. One witness went to some lengths to “gloss over” – as our lawyer put it – the lack of technical assurance. It was left to a detailed forensic review by our legal team to uncover this extraordinary failure. 

Government awarded huge contracts to Ayanda Capital despite it having failed financial due diligence. The hedge fund was given a red rating, which meant there were “Major issues or concerns [which] would need to be resolved before we use them

Not only did this not dissuade Government from accepting Ayanda’s offer to supply millions of FFP2 masks, but its VIP status actually meant that it was invited to supply a different type of mask, leading to an even larger contract award.

This was taxpayers’ money, dished out to companies because of who they knew, not what they could supply. The result – unsurprisingly – was a waste of hundreds of millions of pounds. In these contracts alone.

Our challenge seeks to get to the truth of the PPE procurement process in which – again to quote our lawyer – “a truly colossal amount of public money” was spent “in circumstances of almost total secrecy”.

Please help us shine a light on this scandal by sharing with your friends and family and asking them to sign up for updates. 

Thank you,

Jo Maugham 

Director of Good Law Project

New leader of the council to be elected this month

[Tuesday 25 May, socially distanced at 6.00 pm Westpoint – Owl]

Paul Arnott www.midweekherald.co.uk

Many readers may know that councils have been meeting entirely by Zoom since March 2020, with two great benefits. 

The first of course has been to prevent the spread of infection. The second has been the ability to attend meetings and really get stuck in while not having to drive 15 miles to do so. The final attendance figures for the last civic year are still being looked at – but I suspect that meetings have probably seen a rise of the numbers of councillors attending of about 25%

The reasons for this are clear. Without wishing to play the violin, backbench East Devon councillors are allowed a (taxable) amount of a little over £4,000 per year to cover all their expenses and all their time. Many give two to three whole days a week to their work, and the reward is pitiful. If however they can attend a meeting for a couple of hours without it turning into a whole half day, this enables those with jobs or young families to play a much fuller part.

However, the Conservatives, despite universal pleas from across the political spectrum, have now failed to put in place the legislation needed after emergency Covid-19 powers lapsed on May 7. Therefore, as if in Dr Who’s Tardis, we have all been propelled back to the sideburned days of 1972, when the most recent legislation was passed, insisting that councillors had to be “present” to vote in any meeting.

In 1972, the idea of the internet might pop up in Star Trek or an Isaac Asimov SF novel. And back then, council meetings were mostly old men with brylcreemed hair smoking their way through long afternoons in civic halls. Today that has entirely changed.

One of the problems that my group on the council has is that far from being stale old men with yellow fingers, there is a welcome mixture of younger councillors elected in 2019. It’s not that they have not had two jabs; many have not even had one. The first fruit of the government’s failure was seen at our Cabinet last week where a portfolio holder in their thirties simply did not feel it was safe to attend, and I don’t blame them.

But Cabinet is just 10 councillors. Next week we are being forced to hold our annual meeting – where the Chair and Leader of the council for 2021-22 will be elected by all 59 councillors – in conditions we are still working on at Westpoint. Our own quite sizeable chamber at Blackdown House is not remotely big enough for 59, plus officers, to meet safely.

This will involve a huge amount of wasted public money, councillor and officer anxiety, and the unanswerable question: what do those with one or no jabs do? Sorry to be so blunt, but this government doesn’t give a damn, even though we have been warning about this for a whole year.

It is so obvious that we should meet, as we did last May, to hold this annual meeting by Zoom. But to do so is to break a 50 year old law, and the government has simply washed their hands of the consequences. Closer to home, your parish and town councils are being forced to do this too. Last week, Seaton Town Council held their annual meeting in a car park, praying that the rain would hold off. They will not be alone in this.

However, we will crack on of course, and must continue to make the case to government to legislate as they had promised. I will not hold my breath. Many believe there is a cussed inclination emanating from the Leader of the House, Jacob Rees-Mogg, who sets the tone in these matters, that it’s all stuff and nonsense. Tell that to my eldest son in Glasgow, where the Indian strain this week is as virulent as it is in Bolton.

Overwhelming support for Newton Poppleford Neighbourhood Plan

Residents of Newton Poppleford and Harpford have voted overwhelmingly in favour of a set of locally drawn up policies to help decide planning applications.

Philippa Davies sidmouth.nub.news

The referendum on the Neighbourhood Plan – held at the same time as this month’s local elections – resulted in 652 ‘yes’ votes and just 83 who said ‘no’.

The Plan will now be considered by East Devon District Council’s Cabinet on June 9, and if they agree to formally ‘adopt’ it, the council will be guided by the Plan when making decisions on applications for new developments in the parish.

The Neighbourhood Plan has the general aim of ensuring that ‘Newton Poppleford and Harpford will continue to be a thriving and vibrant village community which protects and enhances its distinctive character, rich heritage and its East Devon AONB setting, and should become an even better place for residents of all ages to live.’

Development applications will be looked at to see if they support that aim, for example by providing adequate parking, not generating extra traffic, retaining public rights of way, conserving the natural environment and incorporating road safety measures.

A consultation on the architectural style of potential new homes was carried out, and the preference was for traditional designs using similar materials to the existing properties.

A summary of the Neighbourhood Plan can be found here.

Today in Court: PPE Legal Challenge

Good Law Project 18 May us15.campaign-archive.com /

Dear Friend,

Today was the first day of our High Court legal challenge over Government’s award of PPE contracts. Here are three of the most shocking revelations from Court.

1) Government prioritised companies because of who they knew and not what they could deliver. Take Pestfix and Multibrands. Both suppliers emailed the senior official in charge of NHS procurement explaining their ability to supply PPE. Multibrands did so on 20th March 2020, a week before Pestfix. Multibrands received no response. 

By contrast, Pestfix’s email resulted in their allocation to the “VIP lane”, where companies were fast-tracked to lucrative contracts. Why? An ex-director of PestFix was an “old school friend” of the official’s father-in-law. 

2) Ministers did not want their political contacts to have to wait in line with everyone else. Evidence read out in Court revealed “…ministers and senior officials sometimes introduce offers of PPE and want them personally handled rather than going through surveys and bulk routes. Some of these contacts simply flatly refuse to proceed via a webform…..”  

3) The banks were so concerned about Government’s lack of due diligence on  companies who had been handed huge contracts that they halted payments. An email from a civil servant stated “It is… imperative that we rectify the with supplier due diligence to ensure we do not leave ourselves at unacceptable risk of fraud/loss

Thank you as ever for your support. There will be more from Court tomorrow. If you’re interested, our skeleton can be read here.

Jo Maugham

Director of Good Law Project

Covid laid bare existing weaknesses in UK government, says NAO

Coronavirus has exposed decades-long weaknesses in government and divisions in wider society, an official parliamentary watchdog has said, including neglect of social care and chronic underfunding in local government.

Peter Walker www.theguardian.com

Amid renewed questions over the reopening timetable, the National Audit Office (NAO) warned that from the very start of the pandemic a lack of planning had left ministers without a “playbook” on how to respond.

In the report released on Wednesday that pulls together lessons from more than a dozen more sector-specific reports into the handling of Covid, the NAO said the virus “laid bare existing fault lines within society, such as the risk of widening inequalities, and within public service delivery and government itself”.

Coronavirus had “stress-tested the government’s ability to deal with unforeseen events”, said Gareth Davies, the head of the NAO, noting that it had shown the need for government to be “systematic” in planning for emergencies, and to learn lessons at speed.

Boris Johnson has told his cabinet that he intends to proceed with the roadmap for lifting England’s lockdown despite concerns over a new coronavirus variant, but said the government would monitor the data over the coming days.

The prime minister told reporters on Tuesday he saw no conclusive evidence to delay the full reopening of the economy on 21 June, though sources have suggested it may not be as comprehensive a lifting of restrictions as previously billed.

“I don’t see anything conclusive at the moment to say that we need to deviate from the roadmap,” Johnson said, adding that more would be known “in a few days’ time.”

A number of cabinet ministers are understood to be reluctant to allow the roadmap to slip unless there is compelling evidence that the spread of the variant could pose a threat to NHS capacity. A Whitehall source said ministers were keeping their counsel while a few more days of data is analysed.

One cabinet source said they expected government to throw “the kitchen sink” at hotspot areas to try to stem the spread of the new variant, expected to become the dominant variant within days. Another cabinet minister said the next few days would be “a race against the virus.”

The chancellor, Rishi Sunak, is understood to be keen to proceed with the roadmap as planned but is prepared to be convinced otherwise if the data is overwhelming.

Other ministers with a particular vested interest in keeping to the 21 June plan if possible include Oliver Dowden, with his culture department in daily talks with sports organisations, theatre owners and others about whether a long-anticipated return of crowds can still happen.

Theatres have given the message that it is “bums on seats or bust” for their profession, a source said, adding: “We completely understand that plans might have to change, but it’s also important to know that we can’t keep the sort of emergency support we’ve offered to the sector going into the long term. Part of our job is to set out the case that more delay could mean the end for some venues.”

Johnson is charged with making the call on whether to proceed with the roadmap, with intense scrutiny over the early weeks of the pandemic, and the charge he allowed the B.1.617.2 variant to establish itself in the UK by delaying curbing arrivals from India, jeopardising a planned summer timetable for reopening the economy.

The NAO report highlighted the need for long-term solutions across areas including the disconnect between adult social care and the NHS, failings in data and IT systems, workforce shortages and ongoing monetary shortfalls, with a warning that already-struggling local government finances had been “scarred by the pandemic”.

The report also collated the total government extra spend on Covid-related measures, putting it at an estimated £372bn by the end of this March, taking in the full lifetime of all policies.

Johnson’s former senior adviser Dominic Cummings is also expected to lay out his view of the early weeks of the pandemic next Wednesday when he appears before a parliamentary committee which is also examining the lessons of the pandemic.

In a Twitter thread, Cummings argued that the early process had been over-secretive, and promised to release what he described as “a crucial historical document from Covid decision-making”.

The NAO report laid out wider failures in planning for a pandemic, noting that Exercise Cygnus, a 2016 modelling of a flu-based outbreak, did not properly consider the issue of shielding clinically vulnerable people. “Government lacked a playbook for many aspects of its response,” the report concluded.

This led to gaps in data, it found, saying that when it was decided last spring that clinically vulnerable people should shield, it took three weeks to identify more than 400,000 of them because of the “challenge of extracting usable data from different NHS and GP IT systems”.

On social care, a lack of integration between care services and the NHS “has been challenging for decades”, the report said, citing 12 government consultations and five independent reviews in the past 20 years.

An impact of this was a better response to the pandemic for health services than for care. From March to July last year, NHS trusts received 80% of their estimated requirements for protective equipment, with the equivalent figure for care providers being just 10%, the NAO said.

It also set out the effects of underfunding, often due to a decade of austerity policies, in areas including councils, the NHS and social care.

The NAO also highlighted findings from its earlier reports about staffing shortages, with 11% vacancy rates in nursing just before the pandemic, and one-third of social care providers saying they needed extra staff.

Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow heath secretary, said Covid had “exposed the NHS and social care to extreme pressure like never before”.

He said: “We entered the pandemic with a weakened NHS with growing waiting list, fewer beds and desperately short of staff. We cannot afford to repeat the same mistakes. We need both an NHS rescue plan to bring waiting lists down and a plan for social care reform. Our NHS and care system cannot be left exposed in the same way again.”

A government spokesperson said: “Throughout the pandemic, our approach has been guided by data and the advice of scientific and medical experts. As new evidence emerged, we acted quickly and decisively to protect lives and livelihoods.

“We have committed to a full public independent inquiry to look at what lessons we can learn from our response to this unprecedented global challenge.”

Chances of June 21 end of lockdown now ‘close to nil’

But Boris han’t seen “anything conclusive at the moment to say that we need to deviate from the road map”.

Max Channon www.devonlive.com

A Government source has reportedly claimed the likelihood of full Covid lockdown restrictions being lifted on June 21 in England is ‘close to nil’.

However, Prime Minister Boris Johnson has today said he has not seen “anything conclusive at the moment to say that we need to deviate from the road map”.

Nonetheless, ITV’s Robert Peston reports “the prospect of the final easing of lockdown restrictions in England going ahead precisely as planned on June 21 are close to nil… according to ministers and officials.”

ITV quotes a government adviser as saying: “It is clear some social distancing will have to be retained, not everything we’ve set out for June 21 is likely to happen.

“But it is also possible some of the easing we’ve done will have to be reversed.”

Meanwhile, the Daily Mail reports that “one Cabinet minister” has said that missing the June 21 milestone could become Mr Johnson’s ‘Theresa May moment’ – a reference to her failed Brexit deadline.

The Mail quotes its source as saying: “This freedom date is burned on people’s brains in the same way as her date for leaving the EU,’ the source said. ‘When she missed it, she was finished.'”

However, Boris Johnson has told senior ministers that he still wants to work through the road map for lifting coronavirus lockdown restrictions in England.

And, on a visit to a vaccine centre in London, he said: “I don’t see anything conclusive at the moment to say that we need to deviate from the road map.

“We’ve got to be cautious and we are keeping everything under very close observation. We’ll know a lot more in a few days’ time.”

The PM’s official spokesman said that he told the weekly meeting of the Cabinet that they would need to monitor the data closely.

“The Prime Minister set out the Government’s desire to continue to work through the road map following the move to step three yesterday,” the spokesman said.

“He concluded Cabinet by re-stating the important need to closely watch the data in the coming days ahead of making decisions on step four.”

The spokesman said that Health Secretary Matt Hancock told the meeting that “comprehensive work” to provide more vaccines and “surge” testing in outbreak areas was continuing.

Sidmouth Town Council has Excelled itself

Stephen Pemberton has sent Owl the text of his letter, as recently published, in the Sidmouth Herald.

[Owl thinks it shows “counter-intuitive” attitudes to late night noise between Exmouth and Sidmouth.]

“Sidmouth Town Clerk, The Leader and Sidmouth Town Councillors have excelled themselves.

They have allowed the proposed Sidmouth Jazz and Blues Festival in June 2022 to apply for a drink and entertainment license from midnight until 2.30am each morning of the week.

This is a residential area.

Recent years has seen events on The Ham close by 9.30pm, and be placed at the sea end of The Ham, except the Folk Festival which ends and is cleared by 11.00pm, and the Fun Fair.

All this continues decades long lack of consideration of the needs of local residents. It compounds a recent imposition of groundworks which falsely claims it has the Agreement of Glenisla Terrace residents, and the sudden (despite assurance by the Town Clerk as to otherwise) removal of the shielding of trees and bushes for some of the houses from The Ham playground.

Events on The Ham are why many residents moved here: complete disregard for residents’ needs and of reasonable behaviour perpetuates the long held poor reputation of Sidmouth Town Council and how it is run, apparently again with complete disregard for local residents.”

Stephen Pemberton

Border policy is a joke, says Dominic Cummings amid Indian variant row

A teaser of what to expect next week from Boris Johnson’s “Disrupter-in-Chief”.

Henry Zeffman Tuesday May 18 2021 www.thetimes.co.uk 

The UK’s border policy is a “joke”, Boris Johnson’s former chief adviser has said as the row intensifies over whether the Indian coronavirus variant could have been stopped before it entered Britain.

Dominic Cummings accused the government of being “totally hostile to learning from east Asia” over the course of the pandemic, resulting in a reluctance to close the UK’s borders.

Writing on Twitter, Cummings, who left Downing Street during a power struggle late last year, said that “one of the biggest misunderstandings” was that there is a trade-off between locking down to stop Covid and protecting the economy. “Fact: evidence clear that fast hard effective action best policy for economy AND for reducing deaths/suffering,” he wrote. “Best example: Taiwan. Also shows that if you really get your act together not only is econ largely unscathed but life is ~ normal.”

He continued: “There’s a general western problem based on nonsense memes like ‘asians all do as they’re told it won’t work here’. This is what many behavioural science ‘experts’/charlatans argued, disastrously, in Feb2020. This nonsense is STILL influencing policy, eg our joke borders policy.”

Cummings will give evidence to MPs next week about his role in the government’s response to the pandemic.

There has been increasing criticism of the UK’s decision not to close down travel from India earlier. At least 20,000 passengers who may have been infected with the variant were allowed to enter Britain before India was added to the red list on April 23, according to a Sunday Times analysis.

Johnson had been hoping to fly to Delhi on April 25 to discuss a post-Brexit trade deal with Narendra Modi, the prime minister; something opposition figures blame for the government’s delay in blocking travel from India.

In the Commons yesterday Yvette Cooper, Labour head of the home affairs select committee, said that people would be “angry” that “the government’s border measures have failed to prevent the spread of a new variant”.

UK farmers sound alarm over Australia trade talks

UK farmers have sounded the alarm over reports the government plans a trade deal with Australia that would make its food and farming imports cheaper.

Government about to abandon the farmers as well as the fishermen? – Owl

BBC News  www.bbc.co.uk

The move is being considered as part of a free trade pact with Australia the UK government hopes will be a springboard for similar deals with other countries.

But UK farming unions have warned of “irreversible damage” from a bad deal.

There is speculation the Cabinet is split over the move, and Labour has accused the government of a “sell-out”.

As with many countries, farming imports from Australia face tariffs – or taxes – making lamb and beef, for example, more expensive.

But in a post-Brexit world, the UK government is keen to strike free trade deals and has now indicated that farmers may have to prepare for the lowering of tariffs on agricultural imports.

The Department for International Trade (DIT) would not be drawn directly on reports it is willing to concede to zero tariffs in return for an Australia deal.

Struggle to compete

However, it said a deal would be “an important stepping stone” to joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a sprawling trade group that includes New Zealand, China, Japan, Vietnam, as well as Australia.

A deal would “allow UK farmers even greater access to growing consumer markets in Asia”, the DIT said, adding that it would not allow importers to undercut the farming industry or food standards.

However, the National Farmers’ Union warned that its members will struggle to compete if zero-tariff trade on lamb and beef goes ahead.

NFU president Minette Batters said: “We know that if we’re to open up the opportunities of new markets overseas for UK farmers, we will have to offer greater access to our own markets in return.

“However, this trade-off needs to be balanced, and we need to make sure concessions to our hugely valuable home market are not given away lightly.

“There is a very real risk that, if we get it wrong, UK farming will suffer irreversible damage rather than flourish in the way we all desire, to the detriment of our environment, our food security and our rural communities.”

Farmers’ concerns are reportedly shared by some members of the Cabinet.

The Financial Times reported that Environment Secretary George Eustice and Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove are at loggerheads with International Trade Secretary Liz Truss and Brexit minister Lord Frost over granting tariff-free access to Australian, and possibly New Zealand, farmers.

Asked about the rift by the Press Association, Mr Eustice said: “I’m not going to get into discussions that are going on in government about individual trade agreements.

“In any discussion on any part of government policy, and trade agreements are no exception, there’s a discussion and there’s a consensus.

“At the moment there’s a very clear consensus in government that we want to do a trade agreement with countries like Australia, but obviously on the right terms.”

However, sources did not deny to the BBC that there were Cabinet divisions over the issue.

Emily Thornberry, Labour’s shadow international trade secretary, accused Ms Truss of selling out British farmers.

“It’s perfectly normal that the Australian government should try to get the best possible deal for its agricultural mega-corporations,” she said.

“But British family farmers have a right to expect that Liz Truss will do the same for them, not sell out their livelihoods for the price of a quick trade deal, and a cheap headline at the G7 summit.”

Ms Truss was hoping to secure an Australia deal ahead of the G7 summit in June. She is about to start official trade talks with Canada and Mexico, adding to those under way with India and New Zealand.

Analysis box by Dharshini David, global trade correspondent

Trade deals are about countries trying to secure the best for their businesses and people. When working down the menu of issues, the hardest to digest – typically, agriculture – is normally left to the last.

Australia aims to get tariffs and quotas dropped for all goods, which on the UK government’s own estimates could boost imports from that country by 83% – mainly due to beef and lamb.

That’s worrying for some farmers – but the government says any liberalisation would take years, and Australia isn’t taking full advantage of the tariff free quotas it’s got now.

But the key is what it signals for other trade deals and policy. An agreement with Australia will likely be the first one struck by the UK with a nation with which it didn’t have an agreement while part of the EU. And Trade Secretary Liz Truss is keen to strike it fast, as a springboard for membership of a wider trans-pacific trading bloc.

 

Devon’s best beaches awarded Blue Flag status for 2021

Fourteen beaches in Devon have been awarded Blue Flag status for 2021.

These include Exmouth, Sandy Bay and Sidmouth Town but not Budleigh Salterton! – Owl

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com

The independently assessed seal of approval is awarded to beaches which achieve very high quality standards of excellent cleanliness, safe access and appropriate signage.

Blue Flag awards also look at the beaches which meet high environmental standards and tough international bathing water quality standards.

Winning beaches also had to run a minimum of five educational activities for the local community and visitors.

Across Devon, 14 beaches were given the prestigious award, the same number as in 2020.

The beaches in Devon given the blue flag award are:

  • Blackpool Sands
  • Sandy Bay (Exmouth)
  • Exmouth
  • Sidmouth Town
  • Challaborough Bay
  • Dawlish Warren
  • Teignmouth Town
  • Breakwater Beach (Brixham)
  • Broadsands (Paignton)
  • Meadfoot Beach
  • Oddicombe Beach
  • Preston Sands
  • Torre Abbey Sands
  • Westward Ho!

The Blue Flag is widely considered to be the gold standard for beaches and as such is internationally recognised. While most people are aware that the certification guarantees the quality of the bathing water this is only part of the criteria on which beaches are judged.

To qualify to fly the Blue Flag the beach must satisfy standards in four categories and against 33 individual targets covering environmental education and information, water quality, environmental management, safety and services.

Cllr Cheryl Cottle-Hunkin, lead member for community, culture and leisure for Torridge District Council, said: “We’re very lucky in Torridge to have such a fantastic beach at Westward Ho! that has consistently achieved the Blue Flag award for over 18 years in a row. It also backs onto Northam Burrows which is another important asset for rare Wildlife and Plant species.

“A better awareness of plastic issues in our marine environment has only increased interest in beaches that meet the strict criteria for cleanliness and the partnerships with community group initiatives are something we can all be proud of.”

Keep Britain Tidy’s chief executive Allison Ogden-Newton said: “This year, more than ever, we are going to be relying on our country’s beautiful beaches to escape for a much-needed break after all the stresses and strains of the past year.

“Whether it’s camping in Cornwall, renting a cottage in North Yorkshire or simply having a day out at the seaside in Sussex, a fantastic beach is an essential part of a holiday for so many of us.

“From environmental education for the local community and ensuring responsible beach use, to cleaning regimes and an increasing number of recycling facilities, it is a full-time commitment to create beaches worthy of these awards.

“As we all plan our 2021 holidays much closer to home, thanks to the Blue Flag and Seaside Award those choosing to holiday at a destination with an award-winning beach can be assured it will be clean and safe and meet the highest standards for water quality and management.”

‘Boris Johnson’s delay over India variant is another unforgivable own goal’

Dawdling, incompetence and the threat of disaster are overshadowing what should be a day of joy as England’s lockdown rules are eased.

Kevin Maguire www.mirror.co.uk  (Extract to get the flavour)

They are the hallmarks of Boris Johnson who is once again snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

India’s inclusion on the Covid-19 red list was delayed and now the rapidly-spreading mutation of the virus detected in that country is jeopardising the planned end to all restrictions in England, planned for June 21.

It’s another unforgivable own goal by a charlatan who will eventually burst his vaccine bubble…..

Rock Feilding-Mellen: the Tory councillor forced to resign after Grenfell

Rock Feilding-Mellen has run a property development company since 2009, and in 2011, at the age of 32, was promoted to a cabinet position at the Conservative stronghold of Kensington and Chelsea council.

Robert Booth www.theguardian.com

Socially Conscious Capital helps obtain planning consent for housing on greenfield sites.

While in charge of housing and regeneration at Kensington and Chelsea, he was treated to dinners and entertainment by property lobbyists, his register of interests shows. But since the Grenfell fire that forced his resignation, he has developed wider interests.

In January he became the director of a new “psychedelic venture studio” company, according to records at Companies House. It intends “to build and invest in companies devoted to providing safe and wide access to psychedelic medicines”.

Based at his family’s Tudor stately home in Oxfordshire, Beckley Park, Beckley Waves works with the Beckley Foundation, which is “progressing innovative formulations and applications of well-characterised psychedelic agents such as psilocybin” and is designing “new chemical entities” that improve upon existing psychedelics.

His mother, Amanda Feilding, is the chair of its scientific advisory board. Also known as the Countess of Wemyss and March, her interest in alternative medicine led her to drill a hole in her own skull in 1970 to better understand the potential benefits of trepanning.

East Devon prosperity rises according to the Legatum Institute

But still outside top 100

East Devon is the area in the south west which has seen the biggest improvement in overall prosperity in the last decade, according to a new study.

[The Legatum Institute is a think tank based in London run by Philippa, Baroness Stroud, a Conservative member of the House of Lords. It is funded by a Dubai-based investment firm. Owl thinks it would be reasonable to describe it as “Centre-right”.] 

Daniel Clark, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk

The United Kingdom Prosperity Report 2021 published by the Legatum Institute ranks the 379 local authorities across the UK by 12 key measures covering crime, personal freedom, local democracy, family and social relationships, the  economy, quality of life, health, education and the environment.

East Devon has seen the biggest rise in the region stretching from Cornwall to Gloucestershire, up from 180th to 102nd place after improvements in governance, personal freedom and natural environment.

It is the highest ranking area of Devon, with Torbay bottom for the county and the South West region in 292nd place, down from 284th in 2011.

Top of the UK list is Wokingham in Surrey, with Blackpool in Lancashire at the bottom for the second year in a row.

The south west ranks second behind the south east, coming out top for safety and security but last for infrastructure, with 25 of the 30 local authorities in the top half of the index. It has strong institutions, social capital and health, and relatively low rates of poverty.

The report adds: “Its major weakness is economic: local employers face skill shortages, there is a lack of adequate infrastructure, and financial pressures on local councils are increasing.”

It says the index was set up to help drive the government’s levelling up agenda by providing an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of every region and local authority area.

The report says the UK is the 13th most prosperous nation in the world, with national prosperity increasing from 2010 to a peak in 2018. Since then, every region outside London has seen a small decline.

It says: “Overall, the UK is continuing to build a strong and open economy. It has achieved big improvements in the quality of its infrastructure, labour force engagement and competitiveness. 

“But these gains are currently being undermined by a deterioration in several specific areas: 

  • in the quality of conditions for local enterprise, which are needed to bolster business dynamism and entrepreneurialism; 
  • in the safety and security of communities, which are struggling with increasing violent crime;
  • in the physical and mental health of people; 
  • in key indicators of social capital, including weaker family relationships, evidenced by an increase in looked after children; 
  • and, to a lesser extent, in the quality of local governance.

The report warns that the national conversation about ‘levelling up’ is too simplistic, with wide variations between and within regions.

It says: “Prosperity is currently being undermined by factors that lie outside of the traditional focus on ‘bridges and trains’. 

“These include a decline in the safety and security of communities due to rising violent crime, a deterioration in people’s mental and physical health, an erosion of social capital, including fraying family relationships, weakening enterprise conditions, a loss of public trust in institutions and deteriorating local democracy.”

East Devon could close public loos in major shake-up

A major review of East Devon’s public toilets is set to be launched.

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com

More than six years after a review of the toilets run by East Devon District Council was first mooted, councillors on the cabinet last Wednesday unanimously agreed to launch the consultation over the public toilet service in the district.

Councillors were told that the continued provision at the current level is no longer sustainable, with the review seeking to balance the savings requirement with protecting a level of toilet provision, enhancing and investing in retained stock.

And while public toilets matter to everyone, as the provision is not a statutory service the council is required to provide, and with them facing a £3m budget gap, the review aims to reduce the costs of providing the service, review the ways in which it is provided, the number of overall toilets they provide, particularly in locations where demand is less or alternative facilities exist.

All of the council run toilets have been provisionally split into three categories. Category A, where provision will be maintained and investment made to bring them up to standard. Category B, where they will look to consider marketing a lease opportunity for a different offer such as a café, to include a publicly accessible toilet. And Category C, where there would be no commercial alternative and would be offered to town and parish councils to run, but if they turned down the chance, they would be closed.

Cllr Geoff Jung, portfolio holder for the environment, said: “Most of our public conveniences were built in the 1950s and the plumbing and structures are not as they were. Some of the toilets closed for over a year there has not been much call for. Let’s face it, the loos are passed their sell by date and some will soon need to be shut as they will fail environmental standards. The world has moved on but our loos are a flashback to the mods and rockers.”

The proposed categorisation of the toilets run by East Devon

CATEGORY A

Promoted Stories

  • West Street Car Park, Axminster
  • Cliff Path, Budleigh Salterton
  • East End, Budleigh Salterton
  • Jubilee Gardens, Beer
  • Foxholes Car Park, Exmouth
  • Magnolia Centre, Exmouth
  • Manor Gardens, Exmouth
  • Phear Park, Exmouth
  • Queens Drive, Exmouth
  • Lace Walk, Honiton
  • West Walk, Seaton
  • Connaught Gardens, Sidmouth
  • Triangle, Sidmouth
  • Market Place or Port Royal, Sidmouth

CATEGORY B

  • Station Road, Budleigh Salterton
  • Imperial Recreation Ground, Exmouth
  • Orcombe Point, Exmouth
  • The Maer, Exmouth
  • Harbour Road, Seaton
  • Seaton Hole, Seaton
  • Market Place or Port Royal, Sidmouth

CATEGORY C

  • Brook Road, Budleigh Salterton
  • Dolphin Street, Colyton
  • Exmouth Bus Station, Exmouth
  • Jarvis Close, Exmouth
  • King Street Car Park, Honiton
  • Marsh Road, Seaton

In his report to the cabinet, Andrew Hancock, service lead for StreetScene, said: “The review proposes to invest in toilets that are retained to ensure the right toilet in the right place, this is important since no capital investment has been made for a number of years. Many of the sites need updating to meet modern standards and expectations as well as incorporating Covid secure/improved hygiene design features.

“While there have been a handful of local complaints about the inconvenience of some of our public toilets being closed during the pandemic, on the whole the open blocks have coped with the community need and we’ve had less complaints about the facilities as they are maintained to a higher standard.

“Even in the height of summer 2020 when we saw record levels of use at our parks and beaches, the toilets we had open were sufficient for most, so one has to ask if we know we need to invest significantly in re-building or refurbishing our outdated toilets for modern requirements, and we know we have a high number of toilet blocks compared to neighbouring areas.

“Moving forward, it would seem sensible to provide a smaller number of better provisioned and better maintained toilets, with other sites re-purposed, for example, the Seaton Chine Hideaway café, and still providing some form of toilet access, particularly as the positioning or use of some public toilets are questionable.

“It is very important that we continue to provide high quality public toilets for our residents and that we recognise they have an important role to play in our visitor economy; but that future provision is financially sustainable and that we are making the best uses of our sites. Continued provision at our current level is no longer sustainable. This review seeks to balance the savings requirement with protecting a level of toilet provision, enhancing and investing in retained stock.”

He added: “The overall objective of the council should be to provide high quality, modern facilities that are mainly located in town centres, tourist areas and parks which help support these areas. The council should look at other means of operating toilets and be concerned with overall levels of provision, but not necessarily direct provision in all cases.

“We recognise that public toilet provision is an emotive subject and an important service. It is however non-statutory and costs almost £900,000 per year including recharges. With budget pressure from reducing government grants we must look at transforming how we operate services, and our medium term financial plan sets out targets for savings from different ways of operating.

“This review is looking to ensure East Devon continues to provide high quality public toilets in a sustainable way, but also recognising in some situations other methods of provision might be appropriate, indeed beneficial to the public, particularly where there are multiple toilet blocks or toilets are less well used and some sites could add a café, bar or other commercial offer.”

Cllr Paul Hayward, portfolio holder for economy and assets, added that change was necessary and the council had to think about what was considered necessary going forward.

He called for all the towns and parishes affected to be invited into the discussion to see if they can run them more efficiently, and said there would need to be some innovative thinking, and that ‘some things won’t be palatable, but this needs to be done’.

Cllr Cathy Gardner said that she was concerned about any charging for toilets as it would be a retrograde step for public health and as charging reduces the use of toilets, the council should do all they can to avoid it.

Cllr Paul Millar added that there should be one free of charge toilet in each town where there are areas of deprivation whatever the outcome of the review was, while Cllr Steve Gazzard said that they had to take the public with them on the review, and Cllr Marcus Hartnell said lessons needed to be learnt from the Seaton café example to ensure a minimum level of provision was still provided.

The cabinet agreed to the basis for the toilet review to ensure ‘we have the right toilet in the right place’, which will focus on the provision and support for Category A public conveniences at the key locations, seeks to provide opportunities for others to take on Category B sites, and offers Category C sites to Town & Parish councils if they feel continued provision here is necessary.

The review will also determine whether to install contactless paid access on the retained toilets to enable a future income to help meet deficits and improve toilet standards and whether in-house operation, which is more cost effective than private sector operators, and whether they resolve to continue operation on this basis.

It will also see them agree to consult with all stakeholders to obtain their views of these proposals in order to gain understanding/agreement that public toilets need investment to modernise them, whether to investigate charging for their use to protect future provision, and to provide a concessionary card for those with medical needs.

A recommendation that a capital budget of £3.15 million be set as part of the 2022/23 budget for the rebuild or refurbishment of all Category A public toilets, subject to the results of the consultation, was also made to full council.

Prior to any decision being made, the cabinet also asked the Overview Committee to review the consultation responses and equalities assessment and provide its views, with Cllr Paul Arnott, leader of the council, saying that this was the time for concerns around the individual toilets mentioned in the review to be raised, rather than at last week’s meeting.

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 3 May

Ex-Boris Johnson aide accused of lobbying for £187m government loan for firm he worked for

Boris Johnson’s former top aide Lord Eddie Lister has been accused of lobbying for a £187m taxpayer-funded loan for a company he worked for while in Number 10.

Stefan Boscia www.msn.com 

Lister, who suddenly left Number 10 last month, had a paid role at luxury property developer Delancey while simultaneously working for Johnson and as chairman for Homes England.

The Sunday Times revealed today that Lister attended a meeting at Homes England, a government body, that was being held to deliberate on a £187m loan application for a Delancey-run project.

The loan was approved.

At the time, Lister told other people at the Homes England meeting that he had “previously undertaken advisory work for Delancey”.

The minutes of the meeting say: “The committee were content that this did not constitute a conflict of interest.”

However, this was revealed to be untrue as he was still being paid by Delancey for consultancy work.

In his register of interests at the time Lister said he was working for Dream Ltd – a reference to Delancey Real Estate Asset Management.

Whitehall sources told the Times that some civil servants were concerned that Delancey were receiving preferential treatment.

One said they had been under “enormous pressure” to rubber stamp the loan.

Shadow justice secretary David Lammy said: “The sleazy, grubby, double-dealing Conservatives have rotten government to its core.”

Lister apologised for not fully disclosing his links with Delancey to Homes England and insisted “there was never any intent to gain any unfair advantage for the company”.

“On the board, I had no substantive involvement in matters relating to Delancey, recognising the potential for a conflict of interest,” he said.

“I do accept that it would have been better to fully recuse myself at the meeting where the Get Living consortium was discussed, given my separate role with the Delancey group of companies.”

The post Ex-Boris Johnson aide accused of lobbying for £187m government loan for firm he worked for appeared first on CityAM.

Microsoft and partners may be compensated if you purchase something through recommended links in this article.

The view inside the People’s Republic of Chipping Norton

Pssst – didn’t East Devon get there first? It’s what happens when Conservtive loyalties are stretched to breaking point – Owl

Tom Wall www.theguardian.com

The honey-stone centre of Chipping Norton and its affluent surrounding villages were once famed as the haunts of former PM David Cameron, along with his set of wealthy, powerful media and political allies. It is perhaps, then, the last place you would expect to witness the stirrings of anti-Tory southern rebellion. But this month it happened when the Cotswolds ward – along with nine others in Oxfordshire – rejected the Conservatives.

This week could see a rainbow, progressive coalition – made up of Liberal Democrats, Labour and the Greens – put the Conservatives into opposition for the first time in the county’s history. This comes after an alliance of non-Tory councillors last week took power in Cambridgeshire after the Conservatives lost control of the county – as well as losing the mayoral contest to Labour. The blue citadel of Tunbridge Wells borough council was also breached as the Conservatives lost their overall majority for the first time in more than 20 years.

These shifts in voter behaviour have received less attention than Labour’s ongoing struggles in some former red wall seats in the Midlands and the north, but some pollsters believe the crumbling of southern Tory strongholds could pose the party serious electoral problems. Professor Rob Ford of Manchester University argues that relatively affluent, well-educated voters are turning against the Tories in parts of the south-east, reflecting the breakdown of traditional, class-based voting patterns since the EU referendum. “The Conservatives risk falling into the same trap that New Labour did when it won in the south,” he says. “You get so excited about your advance in terrain that’s unfamiliar that you lose touch with your traditional heartlands.

“If the loyalties of Tory voters are stretched to breaking point, then it could get quite dramatic.”

Chipping Norton’s victorious Labour county councillor, Geoff Saul, is still coming to terms with his narrow 60-vote win, which encompasses the town and rural villages. “It’s a bit of a shock,” he said, in the cramped back room of his solicitor’s firm in the town. “It’s been a safe Conservative seat for 15 years.”

The signs of change were there if you looked closely, however. Saul and his small band of party activists have been patiently making inroads for years. “When I first moved here [20 years ago], most other councillors were Conservative. We’ve now got three Labour district councillors and 11 out of the 16 town councillors are Labour. Market towns have not been fertile territory for Labour, but we’ve turned Chippy red.”

There is plenty of evidence of this localised red surge, with Labour placards still adorning Cotswold-stone cottages and blooming, pretty gardens throughout the town. For some, there is pure jubilation. “I’m so pleased. I’ve just tweeted ‘I’m having soup in the people’s republic of Chipping Norton’,” says Edwina Lawrence, 69, an NHS coach, sitting outside a cafe on the High Street. “I’m very happy.”

Labour can count on unionised workers, mostly in the public sector, and increasingly professionals too. “The cottages that used to be for tweed mill workers 100 years ago are now full of university professors and teachers – that’s where I get lots of my votes,” says Saul.

Younger graduates with progressive voting habits are also moving from cities like Oxford. “[The result in Oxfordshire] goes against what is happening in the rest of the country, but maybe it is because of the move out of Oxford,” said Nicola Chadwick, 34outside the town’s Midcounties Co-operative, which has its roots in workers organising in the industrial revolution. “I’ve just moved [from Oxford]. I voted Labour and Green.”

Meanwhile, the Conservative vote is breaking for progressive parties. Rachel Stringer, 30, who previously always voted Tory, opted for Labour. “I’ve lost faith in the Tories. Brexit had a big impact because I’m anti-Brexit. I cried the morning after the referendum,” she says. “I thought I would never vote Labour – it’s bizarre.”

Other Conservatives feel overlooked and switched to the Greens. “It was a protest vote with a heart,” says Tina Gibbons, while her spaniel waits at her feet. Her friend, Sarah Eve, also turned against the Tories: “[This town] was very high-profile when we had David Cameron but it has been neglected since”

These painful upheavals for the ruling party were repeated across the county. The Lib Dems gaining eight councillors and the Greens three councillors. The Conservative leader of the council and chair of the LGA’s wellbeing board, Ian Hudspeth, lost to his Lib Dem opponent, Andy Graham.

While local issues such as contentious housing developments played their part, there is agreement that underlaying changes in traditional voting patterns are making life harder for the Conservatives in Oxfordshire.

The thoughtful new leader of the Conservative group, Eddie Reeves, says: “The party focus is quite understandably in growth areas. That will necessarily entail growing pains elsewhere. We are part of the unloved Tory shires.”

Oxfordshire Tory MPs such as John Howell in Henley and Victoria Prentis in Banbury, he adds,should not be complacent, he warns. “Those majorities were inflated by getting Brexit done and the Corbyn fear factor. I could well see them, a bit like a souffle, going [down] at the next election if there’s a strong Labour or Lib Dem challenger,” he says. “They are not as rock solid as they seem.”

Torbay Council sets up housebuilding company

Torbay Council has set up its own housing development company as part of its multi-million pound plans to tackle the housing crisis.

[You can guess that Torbay is not Conservative controlled – Owl]

Ed Oldfield, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk 

Torbay is the most deprived area in Devon with only half the national average of social housing. One in four households rent privately and an estimated one in four children live in poverty. The area saw homelessness rising before the pandemic with hundreds of families on the waiting list. A council report at the end of 2019 described the situation as a housing crisis.

The council is now pressing ahead with plans to use its own companies to build and rent  homes, as well as working with established social housing providers. The project is expected to involve the authority lending more than £40 million towards building at least 360 homes, with more than 200 for social rent.

TEDC Developments will design and build the properties to be rented out by TorVista Homes,  both council-owned companies set up by the TDA Group, which is owned by the council to deliver economic development.

TorVista Homes was given registered provider status by the social housing regulator in March, which allows it to receive funding from the government agency Homes England. The council says it plans to deliver a range of affordable housing including temporary accommodation, extra care housing, homes for older people, social rent, affordable rent and shared ownership.

Housing has been identified as one of the key areas to be tackled by the partnership of Liberal Democrats and Independents which runs the authority under its aim to tackle poverty. 

The amount of social housing in Torbay at eight out of 100 homes is less than half the national average of 17. 

The council’s cabinet is being recommended to approve a business plan for TorVista Homes. A report to a meeting on this week gives an outline of the project, but the business plan document is being kept confidential because it contains financial information.

The report said the plan sets out that of the first 360 homes to be delivered by TorVista Homes, more than 200 will be for social rent. It said the lower level of assumed activity will involve spending more than £62 million, with the council expected to provide loans of more than £45 million.

The report said: “The financial implications of this new venture for the council are inevitably considerable. The scale of development and the figures to be invested are considerable although this spend is complemented by significant investment by Homes England by the way of grant.”

It is known that the council has allocated £25 million of borrowing to kick-start the housing plans. It is bringing forward plans to build flats for older people at the Crossways shopping centre in Paignton, and develop housing off Preston Down Road.

Another social housing scheme being progressed by the council is on land at Tweenaway Cross in Paignton. Planning permission was given in October 2015 to demolish the empty houses and build two three-bedroom houses and five two-bedroom flats. But the project failed to go ahead and a new planning application was approved in March 2019 to replace the houses with eight two-bedroom flats and one accessible one-bedroom flat.

Plans are being drawn up to develop council-owned land on part of the Victoria car park site at Paignton. The authority has also done a deal to sell land at Little Blagdon Farm to housing developer Taylor Wimpey, with a condition that three in 10 of the homes are for social housing.

In May 2020, the council’s cabinet set an annual target of delivering 180 new affordable homes.

Housebuilding has slowed in recent years in Torbay, meaning the number has fallen below government targets.  The stock of future housing sites has also fallen short of the required levels.

That has given developers a stronger case for schemes such as Inglewood, near Paignton, where a new village of up to 373 homes was approved by a planning inspector in March.

Fear and anger at plans which could leave towns unrecognisable

One Devon Tory MP says he will oppose the Planning Bill. No, not Simon Jupp or Neil Parish. – Owl

Frankie Mills www.devonlive.com

Dramatic proposals to reform the UK’s planning system were unveiled in the Queen’s Speech. If passed, the changes have the potential to create a housing boom that could give developers more free rein developing large swathes of rural areas.

Some residents in Totnes and Dartington fear it could permanently change the face of the town and destroy the green spaces that they have been fighting to protect, while others are concerned it would permit the development of expensive second homes in an area that locals have been priced out of in recent years.

If passed, South Hams, along with each council district in the U.K, will be divided into three categories: ‘growth’, ‘protection’ and ‘renewal.’ Growth areas will have current planning restrictions largely removed while development in ‘protection’ and ‘renewal’ zones will continue to be restricted.

The Planning Bill was announced at a time when Totnes has just been listed as the most searched for countryside market town on property website Rightmove. At the time of writing, there are currently zero properties available to rent in Totnes and 52 properties available to buy.

Anthony Mangall MP for Totnes said he firmly opposed the bill and would vote against it.

“My concern is that we’re going to get houses in the wrong places, we are not going to ensure we’ve got the proper infrastructure to deal with the increase of houses and people, and that we aren’t going to build affordable houses, which is what people need,” said Mr Mangall.

“One of the issues that we’ve had in the last 13, 14, 15 months, has been people being very quickly priced out of the area in which they were born and raised,”

“It’s great that we are an attractive place for people to come and live and work, but I’m also very conscious that… we need to make sure that we are not just building second homes,” he said.

“We’re in a perfect storm,” said Georgina Allen, chair Of planning for Totnes Town Council.

“What’s needed is one bedroom houses for the youth… and smaller family homes. These big executive homes with very little garden are the ones that are the cheapest to build and the most expensive to buy,” she said.

Allen fears that more homes will increase poverty in South Devon, an area where jobs are already restricted to two main industries.

“You’re asking for really severe levels of poverty, we’re not rich. We are totally dependent on the tourist trade and farming. There’s almost no other jobs,” she said.

Allen has been part of the campaign ‘Save Dartington’ for the past several years and has seen green spaces being sold off for development first hand as a means to pay for the estate’s debts.

She is concerned that new housing in an area like Dartington would mean selling off more green spaces and creating additional strain on the few existing facilities.

“Dartington has almost nothing,” said Allen. “All these new houses will have one garage and one shop,” said Allen.

“We will lose the countryside just when we need it most,” she said.

Manhall said that there was a significant number of Conservative MP’s who were working to reform the bill in a way that would be suitable for areas like Totnes and Dartington.

Manhall was one of the many Conservative MP’s who fought against the ‘housing algorithm’, an algorithm that predicted the amount of new homes needed to be built in different zones.

The algorithm predicted that South Hams would need a 117% increase in new homes. The scheme was scrapped after it was found to be based on incorrect data.

“The reason that we asked people to put in neighbourhood plans was because we recognise that every local community has its own views and own interests and own needs,” said Manhall.

“People in South Devon have been very clear about developing their own local neighbourhood plans. These neighbourhood plans matter, they need to be listened to,” he said.

Building crisis looms as dwindling supplies bring sites grinding to a halt

By tradition, the wits of every construction apprentice are tested with two errands early on in their career: to ask the foreman first for some tartan paint and then a long weight.

James Tapper www.theguardian.com 

The joke is ringing even more hollow than usual on building sites across the UK, where firms needing essential building supplies are facing some very, very long waits. The British building industry is in the midst of a supply crisis. From roof tiles to steel, timber to insulation, paint to kitchen sinks, products are scarce – and when they can be found, they’re expensive.

Timber costs 80% more than it did in November, steel joists are more expensive because iron ore has gone up by more than 80%. Soft wood is up by almost 100%. Aluminium is up by about a quarter. Copper is up 40%. Plastics up 60%. Paints are up by about a third.

A combination of Covid and Brexit has caused the crisis, while delays to global supplies caused by March’s Suez crisis have not helped either. They are affecting projects big and small, across the country.

Garry Moore is one of those affected. He moved his 94-year-old father Stan into their family home in Westcliff-on-Sea in Essex during the first lockdown last year, but space was an issue. “He didn’t want to go back to living on his own so we’re having an extension built,” Moore said. “A loft conversion above the garage. I thought it would be a fairly quick job.”

Three months later, the roof still isn’t finished and several walls remain unplastered, but not for lack of trying.

“My builder went up to the Midlands yesterday to look for some tiles, and he couldn’t get them there either. We ordered enough but we’ve only had about half delivered – we’re about 1,000 short. They’re normal terracotta tiles, but you just can’t get them. And there’s no plaster either. I’ve no idea when it will be finished.”

Roof tiles are particularly scarce but go to most builders’ yards and you’ll hear the same story about virtually every product from steel and timber to insulation and kitchen stoves.

“It seems to be almost everything that you need for doing domestic building or any sort of construction,” said Duncan Brock, group director at the Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply, which measures construction industry pricing every month. “The only thing we’re not seeing shortages of is PPE.”

“Demand has increased so rapidly,” said Noble Francis, professor of construction economics at University College London and economics director at the Construction Products Association (CPA), which represents UK firms that make building supplies. “Construction output in April 2020, at the nadir in the initial lockdown, was 45% lower than a year earlier. By March this year, it was already above pre-Covid levels.”

Homeowners are driving the boom – spending is up by 19% in March compared with January 2020. People in secure jobs with little opportunity to spend money on holidays and restaurants decided to invest in their homes and gardens. That appetite for home improvement has boomed since the vaccination programme, after the collective savings of the UK’s luckier classes swelled by about £180bn.

It’s not simply higher prices and shortages – delays are growing too. Cold-rolled steel joists will take nearly five months to arrive, compared with the usual six weeks, according to figures compiled by Aecom, the infrastructure consultancy, for Building magazine.

MDF wood, beloved of interior designers on TV makeover shows, usually takes a week to arrive; now it takes six. Roof battens were usually held in stock by building merchants but now there’s a month-long delay. And the reason why Garry Moore’s builder travelled 150 miles to look for some roof tiles is because the order time has gone from six weeks to a dizzying six months.

“It’s not just construction output here that has recovered very quickly,” Francis said. “Global construction has as well. And that’s particularly the case in the US. Lumber prices in the US have gone up over 250% in the past year.”

Other factors are the blockage of the Suez canal by the Ever Given, and global shipping is still struggling with the disruption caused when Covid first hit and empty containers were stacked up in western ports instead of returning to China. The cost of sending a container from China to northern Europe jumped from US$1,475 in May last year to US$8,303 last Friday, according to the Freightos Baltic Index.

Jonathan Hayter, the owner of Lloyd’s Gardens of London, has an order book that’s full to bulging for the next 18 months, but he has some more immediate headaches to deal with. “We have an account with our regular builders’ merchants and normally we buy pallets of 65 bags of cement,” he said. “These last two weeks, I’ve been rationed to five bags per collection. You can’t do anything with that.

“I’ve had to tell all my customers: ‘You won’t hear from me for two weeks’. Because I’m just driving around builders’ merchants. I’ve turned into an Amazon delivery driver. I’ve driven about 600 miles this week going around Watford and north London, and by 6.30pm on Wednesday night I had a tonne and a half of materials in my van, driving really slowly over speed bumps. You phone ahead but no one will say if they have anything in stock – ‘Just come and check’. It’s ridiculous.”

His cement prices have doubled, and stock quality is troubling him. “Some of it’s a shambles, absolutely shocking. We got some oak sleepers last week, from a reputable supplier. They were bent like bananas.”

Anyone tempted to do it themselves is facing similar problems. The social media feeds for Homebase and B&Q have regular questions about the apparently lengthening lists of items that are out of stock, or will take months to deliver.

Sheds at Homebase can be ordered but the firm’s website warns some will take up to 99 days to arrive. Most fence panelling at B&Q is listed as out of stock except its standard traditional fencing. Homebase refused to discuss its supply situation. B&Q said it was “working closely with our suppliers to manage stock levels and ensure we have products available for customers when they need them”.

Some DIY-ers like Jake Shropshire, an estate agent in Hertfordshire, have pressed ahead. In January he began building an outdoor kitchen, hoping that the wood-burning oven and outdoor seating under a covered pavilion would be ready by summer.

“Like the rest of the world during lockdown, we decided to do up our outdoor space,” he said. “I’ve got a friend who’s a carpenter and we’ve been doing it together. I thought it would take a few weekends.”

Four oak posts that were meant to arrive in 10 days still hadn’t turned up eight weeks later. The timber for the roof and sides has turned up piecemeal, if at all, and it was a battle to get the concrete base done.

“I just got an email today about the kitchen units, saying the container from China has been delayed,” Shropshire said. “It should have been here in March and now they’re saying it’s going to be July.”

The reality of buyers competing for the attention of sellers is that wholesalers and builders’ merchants will tend to favour regular, larger customers, Brock said. Large infrastructure projects such as HS2, the London tideway, Crossrail, the Leeds flood alleviation scheme and Birmingham’s Big City plan are unlikely to be affected.

“The builders’ merchants and distributors will be selecting who they supply to based on long-term loyalty and long-term plans,” he said. “The construction sector is typically not very good at long-term planning, which means they’re not good at forecasting what they need, and so suppliers don’t know how much they need to order.

“Most builders don’t have any idea where most of their supplies come from, and they haven’t had to care until the last 12 months.”

So where do the UK’s supplies come from? Bricks and bulky materials like sand and gravel are almost all locally produced – 76% of materials are made in the UK – but about two-thirds of sawn wood is imported, according to the Forestry Commission. Much of it comes from Europe, particularly Sweden, but the US is now competing for wood.

Europe’s larger manufacturing base also provides a substantial proportion of UK steel and other metals. Plastics rely on the oil industry, and February’s big freeze in Texas caused polymer production to crash by 80%.

Specialist products need to be sourced from further afield. When Garry Moore is not worrying about his dad’s roof, he makes a living as an inventor – the originator of the Propelair toilet, which uses 84% less water than a standard loo by flushing with compressed air, but is only fitted in offices and commercial buildings.

Moore has created a smaller toilet, the Velocity, which is suitable for domestic houses – “it could save an enormous amount of water”, he said – and is about to launch trials of his new invention with Essex County Council.

“It uses plastics and ceramics,” he said. “But we’ve had trouble sourcing ceramic suppliers, and also the polymers for the plastic parts. So I’m arranging the trip to China next month to go to the factories, and try and sort suppliers.” Rather like during last year’s rush for PPE, securing supplies can rest on personal relationships with factory bosses.

There is little else that firms can do but wait, and plan ahead. The UK is a modest buyer in global terms compared to the US, China and the Middle East, Brock said.

Brexit is another factor. Some smaller EU exporters have given up on the UK because of new trade barriers, according to Building magazine. Peter Caplehorn, the CPA’s chief executive, said last week that the UK could run out of key materials because there are not enough facilities to test them and provide the new UKCA certification which replaces the European CE quality mark.

Even those builders in the southeast who have materials are finding it impossible to recruit skilled workers because the number of construction workers from the EU in the UK has fallen by 42% since 2017, from 208,067 to 120,723 – nearly all having worked in London. “Don’t even go there,” Hayter said. “There’s not a shortage – there’s just no labour. The cupboard’s bare.”

Yorkshire and the north-west, which have been riding the wave of the UK’s building boom, may see workers heading south for higher wages.

“If they build a third runway at Heathrow, it will suck up all the spare subcontractor labour,” Brock said. “People vote with their feet. That’s why you get the vans on the motorway on a Monday driving down from the north-east.”

Mark Beard, the chairman of Beard construction, said there may be a second squeeze on labour in the south, if eastern European subcontractors decide to take longer holidays to make up for time missed during the lockdowns.

“We’re nervous about the summer,” he said. “If Europe opens up, some of our eastern European labour might want to take four or five weeks off this summer, instead of the two weeks they’ve had in the past.”

The rising prices may hurt firms which had longer contracts, because they were locked into lower pre-pandemic prices, he added, and the industry is also facing higher insurance costs after the Grenfell disaster.

“But there is a flip side – it really forces people to look at their procedures, to minimise risk. It’s driving better behaviours, better processes.” And if wages rise, that might push building firms towards modular manufacturing – building homes in factories.

“The car industry went through a crisis in the 1970s and came out renewed. If we get a perfect storm in our industry, people will look for innovations that will make us better five years down the road.”