DCC Deputy Leader moans about the effects of austerity – the platform he chose to stand on at recent elections!

Owl is having difficulty understanding why the Deputy Leader (Conservative) of Devon County Council is moaning about cuts in public services, since austerity was the platform he chose to stand on when he asked for public votes at a recent election.

What did he think was going to happen?

Those who didn’t vote for his party (the majority of voters in the country and in Devon (first past the post creates this) knew pretty much how things were going to pan out and are angry but not as surprised as Mr Clatworthy!

Here is his view:

The funding of rural counties over urban areas has been condemned as unfair by the deputy leader of Devon County Council.

John Clatworthy, who is also the cabinet member for finance, said Devon’s budget would have been very different if the county was funded at the national average.

He said the government had recognised the disparity between rural and urban funding and granted Devon an extra £8.4m – the fourth highest in the country.

But overall Devon’s residents were still suffering from historic under-funding.

“I did not come into local government to see fewer resources to support our communities,” he said.

“On the contrary, we need the right level of financial support. Devon does not receive average funding and there is a clear disparity between urban and rural funding.”

Mr Clatworthy said, on average, rural areas received £130 per person less Government funding than urban areas.

Devon’s schools got £287 less per pupil than the national average. If Devon received the average it would mean an extra £25m for the county’s schools, he said.

In Public Health, Devon got £38 per person compared with an national average of £69 whilst the City of London received £200 per person. If Devon received the average it would mean an additional £22.4m.

When it comes to transport infrastructure, for every £100 spent in the South East we receive £7.50 in the South West,” said Mr Clatworthy.

“Because we are receiving less than the average funding, many authorities must be receiving well above the average.

“That cannot be right or equitable and needs to be addressed because the cuts are felt harder on authorities with less than average funding.”

Mr Clatworthy said that the Government’s austerity agenda meant that between 2010 and 2019, almost £250m would have been removed from Devon’s budget.

But, for 2016/17, the county council would still be spending £443.5m on services. After allowing for inflation and other spending pressures, that represented savings of £34.3m on the current year.

In spite of this, there would be an increase of £11.3m in the budget for children and £5m in the budget for adult care.

Mr Clatworthy said the council had decided to accept the Government’s offer of a two per cent increase in council tax to help fund adult social care.

The increase in the living wage would cost Devon over £7 million and the two per cent rise would bring in £6.5m.

“With reduced Government support, we need to have sufficient funds to deliver all our services so, reluctantly, we are having to add 1.99 per cent to the two per cent making a 3.99 per cent increase this year.

“This additional funding will give certainty of income which is essential to protect services.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Devon-s-historic-underfunding-highlighted-council/story-28769419-detail/story.html

Transfer “assets” to town and parish councils, then threaten them if they put up their precepts to pay for them!

BOTH THESE STORIES ARE FROM THIS WEEK’S KNOWLEDGE E-NEWSLETTER PUBLISHED BY EDDC:

That’s what happens when you live in Eton La-La Land!

Council finances are in a “mess” and the vast majority have said they will need to increase charges for services to make ends meet in the face of a government funding cut of 28%, a think-tank has said. As councils finalise their 2016/17 budgets, nearly 90% said they will have to increase charges,
according to a survey by the Local Government Information Unit. The think-tank also found that:

40% would need to cut frontline services that are “evident to the public”. Nine in 10 councils will raise council tax in the coming year, compared with half in 2015. In addition, 82% of councils said they will have to dip into reserves to balance the books, up from 55% in 2015. Jonathan Carr-West, Chief Executive of LGiU, said: “Local government finance is a mess. Our research shows that right now councils are cobbling together their finances by using reserves and increasing charging wherever they can.”

So, district councils are transferring “assets” that cost money to maintain to towns and parishes – toilets, halls, etc – but not assets that make them lots of money, such as car parks. To retain these services, towns and parishes have to increase precepts to pay for them.

BUT

HERE IS THE SECOND STORY:

Parish councils wanting to raise council tax “excessively” may have to first consult the public in line with larger authorities, the Government has warned. Analysis by BBC News show 3,659 parish councils raised the basic Band D tax bill by more than 1.99%, the referendum threshold for larger councils. Sixty small authorities at least doubled residents’ bills last year. Another 130 put their bills up by between 50 and 99% while 1,001 increased the annual bill for a Band D home by £5 or more.

A Department for Communities and Local Government spokesman said: “Town and parish councils should protect their taxpayers from excessive council tax increases; if they fail to do so, government has the option of making them subject to the referendum principles in future.”

Click to access the-knowledge-19-february-2016-issue-39.pdf

Councils buying back homes they were forced to sell

“Freedom of information requests by Inside Housing show that of the £1bn raised since 2012 to replace right to buy, £27.3m of it has been used to buy back homes sold under right to buy.

The government encourages the sale of council houses by offering attractive discounts to tenants, who understandably choose to buy. The council is then faced with dwindling stocks while waiting lists lengthen and homelessness spikes. So it uses its cash to buy back the homes it could not afford to lose in the first place.

If you’re not angry, you should be – it’s a damaging policy that uses Treasury cash to gift people cut-price homes, only to buy them back at full price.”

http://gu.com/p/4gph8

Austerity not working

“The OECD has called for its rich-country members to ease up on austerity and collectively agree to spend more on infrastructure projects to boost flagging growth.

The Paris-based Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development expressed concern about the state of the global economy as it cut growth forecasts made three months ago and warned that low interest rates and money creation by central banks were no longer enough for a lasting recovery.

Marking the latest stage in its shift away from support for austerity, the OECD criticised the over-reliance on monetary policy – low interest rates and the money-creation process known as quantitative easing – and urged that countries adopt a more balanced approach.

The OECD has in the past supported the deficit-reduction programme taken by the UK chancellor, George Osborne, but believes Britain should now join with other countries in spending more on public investment.

“A stronger collective policy response is needed to strengthen demand,” the OECD said in its interim economic outlook, which reduced growth estimates for every member of the G7 group of leading industrial nations – the US, the UK, Germany, Japan, Italy, France and Canada.

“Monetary policy cannot work alone. Fiscal policy is now contractionary in many major economies. Structural reform momentum has slowed.”

http://gu.com/p/4gpv4

“Growth” and zero hours contract hell

When you read all those promises of 1,000 jobs to be created here and 500 jobs there, first realise that this is rarely the true number (in East Devon recently such promises led to only half the number of jobs originally promised at Premier Inn, Exmouth, for example) and the read this article on zero hours contracts – a favoured method of employment in many companies:

Employers counter any criticisms of the use of zero-hours contracts by arguing that employees like the flexibility. The ONS findings, and discussion with those on the contracts, suggest otherwise. In Liverpool, a young mother with two children told me over a cup of tea how both she and her partner were on zero-hours contracts. He had originally planned to meet me at their house as well, but had been offered more hours and felt that the precarity of the contract meant that if he turned it down, he would deliberately be overlooked for future shifts. By the end of the week, he would have worked 70 hours.

The mother worked in a shop, alongside sales assistants on regular contracts. Her work ebbed and flowed with the seasons: more work at Christmas and over New Year, with sales and the festive run on gifts, and more shifts over the summer and Easter breaks, when the staff on regular contracts took their children on holiday. During school breaks, both rarely spent a whole day with their children, but the fear of the weeks where there was a shortfall in rent meant they’d never turned down a shift, even when sick. She told me that they were desperate for permanent contracts offering economic stability and a routine for their children, but were told they were lucky to have anything. …

… A Guardian investigation revealed appalling working conditions at a Sports Direct warehouse, where over 80% of the staff were employed on zero-hours contracts. The conditions included labyrinthine rules on uniforms, pay docked if staff were a minute late, and pay rates that were effectively below the minimum wage. It was able to get away with this because staff without guaranteed pay are effectively powerless, and have to operate at the whim of their employer. Parents who were too scared to take time off work told schools to keep children in when they were sick, rather than risk losing their job.

That’s the fear of zero-hours contracts: that one day, you find your hours have dropped to zero and you’ve effectively been sacked. You can’t challenge your employer over their decision, because effectively, contractually, they were doing you a favour by giving you any shifts at all. A man in his 40s in Redcar told me outside the jobcentre that he had been given no shifts by his construction firm for eight weeks. The jobcentre adviser insisted he was employed, so he wasn’t entitled to jobseeker’s allowance. If he left the job, he’d be deemed to have quit voluntarily … so wouldn’t be entitled to jobseeker’s allowance. This paradox is precisely why so many people are against zero-hours contracts: they make low-paid workers completely powerless, and let their bosses act with unaccountable impunity. Everyone deserves a fair wage for a fair day’s work, and to be able to depend upon it.”

http://gu.com/p/4gz27

Hope your children and grandchildren will be better off than you?

“The idea that each generation would be more fortunate than the last no longer applies and perhaps helps explain why young people feel that traditional politics has little to offer them. The political economy of the analogue age was based on the idea that people would have secure, full-time employment that would enable them to save the deposit on a home relatively quickly.

Two new reports show how that model has completely broken down.

The first comes from the Resolution Foundation, which launched an in-depth study of inter-generational fairness with a look at the housing market. …

… The idea that each generation would be more fortunate than the last no longer applies and perhaps helps explain why young people feel that traditional politics has little to offer them. The political economy of the analogue age was based on the idea that people would have secure, full-time employment that would enable them to save the deposit on a home relatively quickly.

Two new reports show how that model has completely broken down. The first comes from the Resolution Foundation, which launched an in-depth study of inter-generational fairness with a look at the housing market.

The findings are shocking. So-called millennials – those born between 1982 and 2004 are on average 16 percentage points less likely to own their own than their parents in generation X. They, in turn are 10 percentage points less likely to own a home than their parents in the baby boomer generation.

Advertisement

For those on low to middle incomes the situation has become particularly tough. As recently as 1998, more than half of those earning 10-50% of average national income had a mortgage. That figure has now dropped to one in four and will be around one in 10 within a decade on current trends. Owner occupation is increasingly becoming the preserve of the elderly and the well off.

It’s not difficult to see why it has become harder for a young person on a modest income to get a foot on the housing ladder: in the late 1990s it took them three years to save up for a deposit, while today it would take 22 years. Soaring house prices have been marvellous for baby boomers, who have often used their windfalls to create their own mini buy-to-let empires, but have been disastrous for generation rent. London has become a virtual no-go area for young people with ambitions to own a home.

Unaffordable country: where can you afford to buy a house?
Read more
Rising house prices are, however, not the only reason young people find themselves trapped in rented accommodation. The other factor is that they are struggling to make a decent wage in an increasingly insecure and casualised labour market in which low pay is endemic.

That emerges from the first in-depth study into the number of “crowd workers”, people who are paid for work through online platforms such as Uber, Upwork and Taskrabbit. Prof Ursula Huws of the University of Hertfordshire says that 5 million people are being paid through these online platforms, with more than 3 million of them regularly engaged in various forms of crowd work. Delivery drivers, cleaners, tree surgeons, plumbers are increasingly likely to get jobs this way, with the online platform taking a cut of whatever they earn. …”

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/14/economics-viewpoint-baby-boomers-generation-x-generation-rent-gig-economy

80 MPs ( including Neil Parish) in line for third payrise within a year

“Senior MPs could be in line for their THIRD bumper pay rise in a year.
Around 80 members who also help chair committee meetings and debates are set to get the eye-watering wage hike.

Half are in line for an extra £3,700 a year – the other half could see up to £15,000 more in their pay packets.

Chairs – who lead meetings of the influential groups – already get up to £15,000 on top of the £74,000 they get for being an MP, depending on their length of service.

In April, all MPs are in line for a 1.3% increase in their basic salary – which is already more than three times the national average.”

Daily Mirror online

“Defund, make sure things don’t work, get people angry – privatise”!

Several media sites have recently quoted famous philosopher Noam Chomsky on privatisation (and devolution):

That’s the standard technique of privatization; defund, make sure things don’t work, people get angry, you hand it over to private capital.”

So is that what happened with Knowle?

And will we see the new EDDC HQ in Honiton one day sold off to Clinton Devon Estates or Eagle One – or even Moirai Capital investments when district councils cease to exist!

Osborne’s family firm has paid no corporation tax for seven years

Today’s Sunday Times front page:

George Osborne has shares in a £335,000 dividend payout from his family’s wallpaper business – even though it has not paid corporation tax for the past seven years.”

It has avoided paying the tax “partly because it has rolled over losses from previous years and has deferred tax payments“.

The company made a profit of £772,000 on turnover of £34,000,000.

This year’s Tory Black and White Ball: a “glittering” guest list

Remember that, at the same time, the government is attempting to cut Labour Party donations and the money provided to smaller parties and independent parties in the UK.

“Standard” tables at the back of the room with a junior minister or MP were£5,000 each, “Premium” tables nearer to the PMs table with a senior minister £10,000, “Premium” table with a top Cabinet Minister or Boris Johnson AND a ” brush” with the PM £15,000.

Guests at the dinner and auction included

… “Access Industries — owned by Britain’s richest man, £13.17billion
oligarch Leonard Blavatnik — secured a prime spot as ministers including Jeremy Hunt and Michael Gove worked the room. Blavatnik has been criticised for his links to Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Jewellery tycoon Ranbir Singh Suri was also understood to have attended. He became embroiled in a “cash for peerages row” after he was made a Lord in 2014. Other guests included:

DEPARTMENT store owner Christopher Fenwick and Indian entrepreneur Ranjit Baxi, both caught up in a separate “cash for access” scandal after paying £50,000 to dine with the PM in 2014.

REAL-ESTATE brothers Eddie and Sol Zakay, worth £2.2billion through their Topland Group investment firm, who settled out of court with the Ministry of Justice in 2012 after allegedly extracting inflated rents from the Government.

SECRETIVE private members club United and Cecil, which has handed more than £500,000 to the party while taking advantage of a loophole in electoral laws which means its supporters can remain anonymous.”

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6921115/Inside-the-Prime-Minister-secretive-Black-and-White-fundraiser-party.html

MPs pay rises for second time in less than a year

MPs will see their salaries rise by almost £1,000 after the parliamentary pay watchdog signed off another increase. …

… The £952 rise comes just months after the body pushed through a controversial 10 per cent salary increase despite opposition from some MPs and trade unions. …

… It will take the basic wage for all 650 MPs to £74,962 a year, with ministers earning up to another £68,000 on top of that.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/12149835/MPs-pay-to-rise-by-another-1000-just-months-after-10-per-cent-salary-hike-signed-off.html

“Relief fund” to benefit Tory shires including Devon and Dorset

David Cameron has been accused of buying off Tory MPs threatening to block local government cuts, after it emerged that a new £300m relief fund will overwhelmingly help Conservative areas, including his own Oxfordshire council.”

http://gu.com/p/4gh6a

Surrey – £24.1m
Hampshire – £18.7m
Hertfordshire – £15.6m
Essex – £13.9m
West Sussex – £12.4m
Kent – £11.4m
Buckinghamshire – £9.2m
Oxfordshire – £8.9m
Leicestershire – £6.6m
Cambridgeshire – £6.4m
Wiltshire – £6m
Warwickshire – £6m
North Yorkshire – £6m
Cheshire East – £5.9m
Dorset – £5.9m
Richmond upon Thames – £5.8m
Devon – £5.6m
Staffordshire – £5.6m
East Sussex – 5.4
Worcestershire – £5m

Councils not to get any “transition” funding over the two years include: Carlisle, Barnsley, Barrow-in-Furness, Bassetlaw, Birmingham, Blackburn with Darwen, Blackpool, Bolsover, Bolton, Bradford, Burnley, Darlington, Derby, Doncaster, Dudley, Durham, Gateshead, Hackney, Haringey, Hartlepool, Hounslow, Islington, Knowsley, Lambeth, Lancaster, Leeds, Leicester, Lewisham, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside, Oldham, Preston, Redcar and Cleveland, Rochdale, Rotherham, Salford, Sandwell, South Tyneside, Southwark, St Helens, Stockton-on-Tees, Stoke-on-Trent, Sunderland, Wakefield, Walsall, Waltham Forest, Wigan, Wirral and Wolverhampton.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2016/02/09/tory-councils-south-north-funding-nothing-labour_n_9195108.html

If you have relatives in the Labour-run north of England, you might want to suggest they move in with you! But beware, £5.6 million doesn’t go very far – though further than nothing!

David Cameron’s mum fights Tory austerity cuts

“The Prime Minister’s mum Mary has signed a petition aimed at stopping Tory cuts.

Jill Huish, who runs the campaign that Mary backed, said: “It shows how deep austerity is cutting our most vulnerable when even David Cameron ’s mum has had enough.”

Mary, 81, signed a petition railing against Conservative cuts to “essential services”.

She put her name to the battle to save dozens of children’s centres that a Tory-run council is poised to close to save £8million.

Local authorities in England have had their government funding slashed by 40% since Mr Cameron entered Downing Street in 2010.””

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-camerons-mum-joins-fight-7334739

Head of two adult care boards in Devon quits over “relentless cuts”

“The head of two adult safeguarding organisations has resigned, saying government cuts could lead to “a serious incident or death”.

The BBC has learnt Bob Spencer had “serious concerns” about the ability of both Torbay and Devon Safeguarding Adults Boards to deliver services in the face of “relentless budget cuts”.

He became chairman of the Torbay board in 2009, and the Devon board in 2013.
The government said it had provided councils with £3.5bn for social care.
In his resignation letter, Mr Spencer said he had seen how vulnerable people were “hardest hit” by the cuts to these agencies, and “with another four years of cuts, Devon and Torbay will struggle to provide a safe service”.
“We will, I fear, be facing a situation when services are reduced so significantly that those most vulnerable are at risk of abuse on many levels.

“Ultimately neglect, poor care and criminal actions may lead to a serious incident or death,” he said.

Safeguarding boards are statutory organisations which bring together councils, the NHS, and police, to oversee protection for vulnerable people, such as those who have learning disabilities or the elderly.

Mr Spencer said his decision to run as an independent candidate in the next election for the crime commissioner for Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly acknowledged the “tireless” work done by staff and volunteers in the partnership safeguarding agencies.

The Department for Communities and Local Government said councils in England would have “almost £200bn to spend on local services” during this parliament, which it said was a reduction of “just 1.7%” annually in real terms.

A spokesperson for the department said: “By the end of this parliament local councils will be financed from local revenue, such as council tax and business rates rather than central government grant, which is something local government has spent decades campaigning for.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-35513316

Interesting to have an independent stand for police commissioner and one who has been at the sharp end of austerity cuts.

One to watch.

What happens when you privatise care home inspections

The body responsible for ensuring care homes are run to an adequate standard is so short of qualified consultants to help with inspections that it has had to ask the charities it replaced with a private company to help out.

Remploy, the former government agency that has turned into a for profit firm, won a £7m contract to replace the charities in London, the North and South of England, starting a week ago. However, hundreds of “Experts by Experience” have refused to reapply for their jobs after Remploy offered half their previous £17-per-hour pay.

As a result, the Care Quality Commission has had to ask the charities to keep providing the consultants for another two weeks, despite choosing Remploy to take over the inspections programme.

The CQC offered to provide a “buffer” payment to existing experts so they would be paid £15 per hour for the next six months, after which their salary could drop to just £8.40 per hour (£9.25 in London) – which is what Remploy is paying new recruits.

… Every month more than 500 experts, with personal experience of care services, are sent on CQC inspections across adult social care, primary care and hospitals. They play a vital role in the inspection process. However, hundreds of experts have quit their roles – angered by a combination of the pay offer and the fact that a private firm, majority owned by US outsourcing giant Maximus, is profiting from the deal. …”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/care-quality-commission-begs-for-help-from-charities-it-has-just-replaced-a6859326.html

What happens when you contract-out education to profit-led academies

Inspectors say that almost half of pupils at secondary schools run by the Academies Enterprise Trust (AET) are in schools that are “less than good”. Ofsted warns that poorer pupils do “particularly badly” in AET schools.

In response the trust said it was disappointed that its “significant achievements” had “not been sufficiently recognised”.

The Department for Education is threatening that unless standards are raised there will be “further action”.

AET runs 67 academies across England. Such academy chains are independent but publicly funded to run schools. AET has charitable status and a financial report up to August 2014 said there was annual expenditure of £333m.
‘Mediocre’

Inspectors say that 40% of pupils in primary schools run by AET are in “academies that do not provide a good standard of education”. “It is even worse in secondary, where 47% of pupils attend academies that are less than good,” says Ofsted.
The performance of AET’s secondary schools is described as “mediocre” and there has been a lack of progress since Ofsted highlighted weaknesses in the chain’s schools two years ago.

The report says there is a particular weakness in the progress of disadvantaged pupils.

Inspectors also warned about “unacceptably low” attendance levels.

And there was criticism of “insufficient detail” about how the trust is governed. …

Ofsted cannot give a judgement on an academy chain, but inspectors can carry out multiple inspections of individual schools it runs.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-35492433

Fat cats get fatter

“Ministers have come under fire after it emerged an Amazon boss has been appointed to the board of a key Government department.

The appointment has caused further anger over the Government’s record on collecting tax from multi-nationals after it was revealed last year that Amazon paid just £11.9 million to the UK taxman despite sales of £5.3 billion in 2014.

Doug Gurr, president of Amazon China, is expected to be announced as a new non-executive director of the department’s board next week, the latest in a growing number of business leaders appointed to the boards of government departments. …

… Other prominent business leaders on Whitehall department boards are Ian Davis, chairman of Rolls-Royce and Dalton Philips, the former boss of Morrisons and Sir Ian Cheshire, the newly-appointed chairman of Debenhams. …
… It emerged over the weekend that Facebook paid just £86million to all tax authorities outside the United States in 2014, despite declaring profits of more than £2.4billion – which suggests the firm paid a tax rate of just 4 per cent.

But its latest accounts filed to the US Treasury revealed it is reserving a $2.46billion (£1.7billion) fund for ‘uncertain tax positions’ – relating to tax investigations in a range of countries, including the US and Ireland, but not the UK, according to The Times.

The liability fund is more than double the £800million it set aside last year.

Thousands of ordinary British taxpayers, who do not have the luxury of setting aside millions of pounds to settle tax disputes, will start receiving fixed-penalty notices in the coming weeks.

The fees are expected to raise up to £90million for HMRC this year.
The penalties are issued to taxpayers who missed the deadline for submitting their self-assessment on January 31 and apply even if no tax is due.
If they are unpaid after three months, the penalty increase by £10 for every day they remain unpaid, up to a maximum of £900.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3429766/Amazon-boss-appointed-Department-Work-Pensions-board.html

Claire Wright’s speech on tax avoidance yesterday

“Before I begin I have a small announcement to make.

If you have got trouble paying your tax bill, don’t worry … I’ve had a word with George and said to just give him a call and he will do a deal with you. You might even get three per cent!

So, despite the public outrage, Cameron and Osborne STILL think that a three per cent tax deal from Google after a six year investigation is a “major success!”

What do we think about that?!

And despite our government lobbying the EU to PROTECT tax havens, ministers still insist that this country is leading the way in clamping down on corporation tax avoidance!!

What do we think about that?!

And despite HMRC getting a pasting last November by the public accounts committee for its record on tax avoidance, the Conservative government STILL insists that it’s doing a great job on getting companies to pay up!

Over the weekend news broke that six large companies, including AstraZeneca and Shell, have COMPLETELY avoided paying tax in the UK!

Using tax expert, Richard Murphy’s figures we have estimated that Devon could lose around £380m every year to corporation tax avoidance.

£380m is twice the adult social care budget and 22 times the children’s care budget. Effectively, it is equivalent to around an extra £500 for every person living in the Devon County Council area.

That’s money that could be spent on our schools, our hospitals, children’s services and the elderly. All these services are horribly underfunded and horribly under pressure.

Over the past five years £174m has been shaved off Devon County Council’s budgets. We have seen the closure of care homes, youth centres, children’s homes, bus cuts, highways related cuts.

But things are about to get worse. On 10 February (we think) MPs will vote on yet more massive council funding cuts. Devon County Council is set to lose around £28m. This will mean the axing of school crossing patrols, the arts and a raft of other cuts. The social care budget is so under pressure that its scrutiny chairman said last week that the risks of the budget cuts are “massive.”

So this demonstration is aimed at both drawing Mr Swire’s attention to the modern day scourge that is tax avoidance AND also to the forthcoming vote in the House of Commons and how important it is for him speak and vote against it.

And Devon County Council has already urged Devon MPs to vote against the funding cuts.

Mr Swire is a Foreign Office minister for the Commonwealth and responsible for economic and commercial diplomacy, and so in a sound position to press for action on this issue.

I wrote to him about this a few weeks ago but the only reply I received stated that the email was being forwarded to the treasury minister, David Gauke.

This is all very well, but I think we want to know what MR SWIRE himself is doing about corporate tax avoidance – and where he stands on next week’s council funding cuts vote!

Otherwise some of us might start to wonder whether a more appropriate title for him should be Minister for Tax Havens!!

I organised this demonstration BEFORE the Google scandal kicked off, but I am absolutely delighted that it has prompted this issue to dominate the news agenda. The white light of public scrutiny is the ONLY way that we will ever see the rules change on this.

One last thing this is a protest demonstration and we need to demand action verbally as well as visually.

How about:

Hugo Swire: No ifs, no buts, vote AGAINST the council cuts!”

Good turnout for tax avoidance demo outside Sidmouth Conservative Club

Organised by Independent DCC councillor, Claire Wright. More information to follow.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/election-2015/pictures_tax_avoidance_protest_staged_in_sidmouth_1_4402492

Swire does not support equalising pensions for women

“Sidmouth residents Jenny Velterop and Julie Davies spoke out last week about the bid to bring women’s pensionable age into line with men’s – which has seen many people born in the 1950s face a six-year delay.

MP Hugo Swire says that while he understands concerns about the pace of change, the Government has taken measures to mitigate the impact on the worst affected – and alternative arrangements would bring ‘inordinate’ costs to the taxpayer. …”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/east_devon_mp_defends_government_s_stance_on_women_s_state_pension_1_4396714