Renewed interest in petition to cease schools monitoring service by Babcock

In May 2016 East Devon Watch reported on a 38 Degrees petition which sought to remove the armament manufacturer Babcock from a contract to monitor attendance in Devon schools:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2016/05/18/why-is-babcock-the-arms-manufacturer-involved-in-monitoring-school-attendance-in-devon/

The post has been re-read many times in the last few days and the petition has begun to gain more signatures again, which gives the impression that there is perhaps a new disquiet about the 7 year contract.

The £125 million contract was described thus by the company:

https://www.babcockinternational.com/News/Babcock%20awarded%20Devon%20schools%20contract

The 38 Degrees petition:

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/devon-county-council-get-weapons-manufacturers-out-of-education

made the following claim:

Babcock International is a weapon manufacturer operating around the globe. They are also contracted by Devon County Council to monitor and produce reports on school attendance.

After ten sessions (five days) of “unauthorised absence” they send this letter threatening a fine of up to £2500 and/or three months in prison.
The letter is sent to hundreds of parents each year, causing disproportionate distress for what, in many cases, is a single case of illness or forgetting to inform the school in time.

Children become worried that their mum or dad might go to prison. Parents worry their children might be taken into care, that they might lose their jobs, businesses, dignity and freedom.

The threat, and potential fine and imprisonment, disproportionately affects single parents and poor people, who are less able to pay a Fixed Penalty Notice within 21 days (after which it doubles).

I have personally supported a single mum who was working full time, raising two children, starting a business and having to comfort her children who thought that Mum was going to prison.

Babcock’s business is in fear, not in children’s education.”

The petition currently stands at nearly 800 signatures.

Resident raises concerns about possible business park ‘deal’


“This letter, copied with the author’s permission, was published in today’s Sidmouth Herald:

Dear Sir,

I was delighted to read, on page 4 of last week’s Herald, that residents have got a second opportunity to voice their concerns on the proposed business park between Sidbury and Sidford.

Then on page 10, I read that the County Council have withdrawn it’s proposal for a path between Sidbury and Sidford, because Ford’s have offered to pay for it, should they get permission for the business park.

The proposed path is now part of a section 106 agreement between the District Council (as the planning authority) and Fords. Such an agreement is described as a ‘ a DEAL to mitigate the impact of development’. I wonder if the use of the word ‘deal’ indicates what is really happening here- that the offer to fund the path is being used as a “bargaining chip”, to quote Stuart Hughes. As the business park has yet to receive the go ahead and another period of public consultation is in progress, I wonder how the council can justify their decision?

I have written to them to ask for an explanation and I suggest others do likewise. Meantime, may I urge readers with concerns about the proposed business park, to write or email the District Council. The reference number to quote in correspondence is: 16/0669/MOUT. The deadline for comments is 16 September and not 2 September, as is given in the EDDC website.”

Yours sincerely
Alison Kerruish,
Sidford

Resident raises concerns about possible business park ‘deal’

Inequality in Devon

Devon amongst best places for pensioners to live:
http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/devon-among-best-areas-to-live-for-pensioners/story-29670697-detail/story.html

Torquay one of the worst places to raise a family:
http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/torquay-one-of-the-worst-places-to-raise-a-family/story-29668678-detail/story.html

Discuss.

Bring back regular public meetings with politicians and public servants!

An article in today’s Guardian suggests that we need more accountability and transparency from those in public office and suggests that one way to do this is to ensure that our public servants and politicians are put on the spot more often by being expected to attend regular public meetings to explain themselves.

Not the carefully scripted and whipped official committee meetings, where the agenda is tightly controlled and policed, when many of them keep quiet and vote or act like sheep – but situations where they must think on their feet and tell us what they REALLY think (if they think at all).

Imagine if, say once a month, an individual councillor or officer or MP had to be available in the community to answer questions from local electors without warning of what those questions might be!

A few would definitely acquit themselves well – but a great majority in East Devon would definitely be floundering at the first question and thereafter!

An intriguing idea!

” … But social media have not destroyed the public meeting. They have done the opposite. Twitter, Facebook and the rest are indirectly responsible for the glorious revival of the gathering where real people meet in a physical place. For some of us, sitting behind a computer is not enough. We need to get out. What is beyond doubt is that the old-fashioned forum of the public meeting is back and is the perfect counter to social media.


For at least two decades, politicians assumed that a soundbite on the TV news bulletin was what mattered. Oratory as a part of the repertoire disappeared. Politics became technocratic rather than the art form it partly must be. The glory of the public meeting is that there is no escape. A speaker must deliver. The audience is composed of real people. The speaker cannot hide away tweeting alone in a room. People want to be there and need to be there, to be together out of curiosity or as part of what they see as a cause. … ”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug/03/new-big-thing-politics-old-style-public-meeting-labour-battleground-live-events

Oooh … a new road through the Blackdown Hills AONB!

Not IF there will be a new road, but which of two options is preferred:

Devon County Council is developing route options for the scheme and will be holding a two month consultation, starting on Wednesday 3 August and running until Friday 30 September.

The Council is proposing to replace the existing narrow, substandard single carriageway in the Monkton area with around 8km (5 miles) of new road between the Honiton Bypass and Devonshire Inn (the junction of the A30 with the A303).

The scheme will comprise a wide carriageway with 3 lanes. It will be a laid out with two lanes in one direction and one lane in the other to enable overtaking in one direction, alternating along the route.”

Consultation on highway improvements for A30 Honiton to Devonshire Inn

Add that to the refusal by the government to fund faster broadband in the area and one wonders if the Blackdown Hills is finally taking its share of AONB intrusion in East Devon – at last!

Councillor, Leader Diviani’s view (he is DCC and EDDC Councillor for the area):

“I am delighted that Devon County Council is taking such a positive response to our section of the A30. It is such an important part of the region’s connectivity and the proposals will improve the quality of life for all users, whether on long or short distance journeys.”

Exhibitions will be held at the following venues:

Thursday 4 August, 8am-6pm – Honiton Show
Friday 5 August, 2pm-8pm – Upottery Village Hall
Saturday 6 August, 10am-6pm – Upottery Village Hall
Tuesday 16 August, 12pm-8pm – Monkton Court Hotel
Saturday 20 August, 10am-6pm – Mackarness Hall, Honiton
Saturday 10 September, 10am-6pm – Upottery Village Hall

Brexit: where now for Devon and Cornwall businesses?

Devon and Cornwall Business Council:

“1) DEVOLUTION. This process may be very welcome to the business community (or it may not). There has been inadequate consultation for us to know what the implications might be. Either way it will create a period of uncertainty. We cannot afford to risk this whilst so many critical matters are up in the air. I propose that we ask for, at least, a 12 month moratorium whilst clarity is restored. Then we need a proper period of consultation knowing what we then know. Devolution has the potential to provide significant opportunities for devolved administrations to determine their own future when it comes to skills, transport, investment and development, but this agenda needs to be developed collaboratively with the private sector standing shoulder to shoulder with Government.

2) EUROPEAN MARKETS. More than 50% of South West trade is with near Europe. There have been some bold statements that 90% of trading opportunities will be outside the EU in the next 10-15 years. Many, however, of our investors are based in Europe – IMERYS, EDF Energy, Sibelco, Princes Yachts, Plymouth Gin, Barden Corporation to name but a few. Decisions are made in European capitals which affect a large number of our jobs and future growth prospects. We need to ensure that the existing investments are maintained and that we will feature in future investment decisions – access to the Single Market is vital. UK Trade and Industry (UKTI) department officials are already fully stretched (inadequate funding currently, with an increasing workload), we need to establish our own business trade ambassadors to ensure direct contacts are maintained and developed. From this base we can then begin to start creating a forward order book for whatever new trade agreements might emerge. This will also allow a programme to be developed to enable access into new global markets.

3) INFRASTRUCTURE. The South West has for too long been the Cinderella of the UK in terms of infrastructure investment. We have clearly supported plans for future spending on road, rail, air, marine and broadband projects. We must now directly lobby for these, acting as a single voice and ensuring that our South West MPs are lobbied to also speak with one voice. What, however, will make this happen is a demonstration that investment in infrastructure will result in direct business investment. We need to clearly demonstrate what we will contribute in return.

4) PLAY TO OUR STRENGTHS. Some of our most successful business sectors should be the subject of focussed programmes for ambitious expansion – food and drink, tourism and e-health are good examples of where the South West has specialist skills. Add to these; marine / maritime technology, aerospace / space, advanced engineering, digital and creative economy. Designed and co-ordinated tasks forces could achieve spectacular results in these areas of the economy.

5) GOVERNANCE/REGULATION. The system of regulation has been often complained about as a barrier to business growth – red tape, EU regulations or Gold plating from Whitehall? Staffing levels at regulators have been cut making the problems more acute. The establishment of voluntary codes and working partnerships led by trade bodies and self-regulated by them (with rewards for best practise) could greatly improve the current confrontational systems which have become entrenched – particularly in areas such as planning and environmental health.

6) PRODUCTIVITY. We have routinely lagged behind the average UK productivity levels (between 15-20% lower than UK average for Devon and Cornwall1). There are many drivers of productivity; investment, innovation, skills, enterprise and competition. This problem can be partly addressed by self-help. Simple work based systems can achieve significant improvements to outputs (and profits). These include Lean Production techniques. Training for all staff on digital skills and improvements to work/life balance (flexible working hours) which can reduce lost time off through stress / illness.

7) YOUNG BUSINESS. The Business Community has a collective responsibility to re-engage with the next generation to ensure we have attracted the huge talents of our young people. Business support can start by involvement as a Governor at Primary School all the way through to being a voluntary mentor for new start businesses. There are also great opportunities for assisting with work experience. The SW is blessed with some exceptional people with invaluable skills and experience. This should be high on the business agenda.

8) INNOVATION/SKILLS. We are proud of our Universities and Further Education Colleges. They deliver with national and international standards. The ground breaking research they produce is helping to change things around the world. We complain about a lack of relevant skills; however, do we fully engage with these institutions? Do we share with them our future business plans so that skill sets can be anticipated? Do we share with them our challenges in order to co-develop innovative solutions? Do we respond to their outreach work which can tackle production/system deficiencies? The answer is we could all do better. New partnerships should be formed as a priority. In part focusing on achieving young people with relevant skills (matched to growth sectors) through apprenticeships which, have the potential to greatly reduce our reliability on skilled labour from outside the UK, EU or otherwise.

9) URBAN/RURAL. For too long we have allowed ourselves to get sucked into Whitehall speak on the growth of Cities. Seen from the Whitehall bubble this is the best place to concentrate investment decisions. What we are missing by not forging strong urban/rural partnerships represents one of the greatest untapped opportunities for the growth of our economy – natural energy, local food production, health and well-being, water quality, flood/climate change management are all on our doorstep. DCBC will spearhead a rolling programme of partnership opportunities.

10) FUNDNG. The expectation that Government cash will still arrive as before is fool’s gold. Austerity will get worse before it gets better. Business will become even more important in the funding of growth opportunities. This could include matched funding with Devolved Authorities and perhaps taking advantage of cheap Government borrowing. We must set out our investment priorities more clearly and take these to our key stakeholders in the public sector for early discussions in order that improved delivery be achieved.”

http://www.dcbc.co.uk/news/brexit-where-next-business-community-10-point-recovery-plan#

EDDC, DCC, LEP – tell us how Brexit will ( or will not ) affect us

Owl eagerly awaits the pronouncements of:

Paul Diviani – EDDC
John Hart – Devon County Council
and
Chris Garcia – Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership

on how leaving the EU will affect our locality, their plans and their budgets.

You did all have a Plan B for this eventuality didn’t you?

Claire Wright reports massive cuts to Devon NHS services

“Devon NHS cuts loom as regime narrows its focus…

The team parachuted in by NHS England to reduce a massive health service debt in Devon has narrowed down its focus for cuts, it emerged yesterday.
At Monday’s health and wellbeing scrutiny committee, the Success Regime, led by former RD&E chief executive, Angela Pedder, outlined its progress so far and I asked about proposals to publicly consult.

If nothing changes, we were told that the NHS in Devon will be a whopping £398m in the red by 2020/21.

The paper submitted with the committee agenda states: “Some services such as stroke, paediatrics, maternity are not clinically or financially sustainable in the long term without changes to the way they are delivered across the system.

Other services that will be targeted includes emergency surgery and specialties such as ear, nose and throat services.

And it looks as though we will lose more hospital beds across large and small hospitals in the area.

“Bed based activity will decrease and fewer beds will be needed in acute hospitals (big district hospitals) or community hospitals.”

In a separate but perhaps linked development, we also heard yesterday from South Devon Clinical Commissioning Group that it is poised to publicly consult on reducing its community hospital bed numbers from 156 to 96. Torbay Hospital is also set to lose 100 beds.

Five community hospitals are proposed to be closed and sold off, freeing up around £6.2m. These are Dartmouth, Bovey Tracey, Ashburton, Buckfastleigh and Paignton.

The paper goes on to state that there are “initial recommendations on five segments of the population. These are:

– Elderly with chronic conditions
– Adults with chronic conditions
– Adults with severe and enduring mental illness
– Elderly with dementia
– Mostly healthy adults

The changes proposed are set to deliver around £70m of savings during 2016/17, with a £100m expected to be saved by March 2018.

The paper seemed to be a bit light on what consultation would take place, although it was clear that the regime wanted the changes implemented as soon as possible.

I asked twice about this and received a rather vague reply but it looks as though there will be a 12 week consultation, possibly starting in July, which is when the regime is set to publish its detailed plans.

Health scrutiny chairman, Richard Westlake, asked that a detailed consultation programme be sent to the committee.

These are likely to be significant cuts to health services and it is essential that the public consultation period is handled properly and fairly.”

Itemised webcast of yesterday’s meeting here – http://www.devoncc.public-i.tv/…/portal/webcast_inte…/222097

Source: Claire Wright, Independent Parliamentary Candidate for East Devon,mFacebook

“Ben Ingham was born in East Devon. A chartered engineer by profession he has also worked as a district councillor for twenty years dedicating much of hie free time to issues that affect East Devon.

In recent times he has become increasingly concerned about the activities of the East Devon Conservative Group. So much so that last year he was motivated to mount an independent challenge to take over the control of the council. It was this that led to him becoming the leader of the East Devon Alliance of independent candidates.

Amongst his key motivations his top priority is to make sure that the East Devon Local Plan is adopted as soon as possible in order to protect the district from uncontrolled development.

He is also working to create a Development Strategy Committee to ensure that development can be managed in a sustainable and intelligent way.

He is also keen to abolish the cabinet system at East Devon District Council in favour of a committee system where all councillors become involved in making decisions on their constituents behalf.

The following interview was filmed when he visited a meeting of like minded people in Totnes on the 25th May of this year in order to discuss independent councillors in local democracy.”

http://www.educatingindependence.com/independence-in-democracy-interviews-ben-ingham/

DCC Leader has second (and third) thoughts about devolution

A report by Totnes (Green) DCC councillor Robert Vine

Here’s the webcast of the County Council Annual Meeting where the Leader, John Hart, has a serious rethink about whether to keep supporting the Devolution Bid. Watch from 01:04:00 to 01:12:45 or click “13: Cabinet Member Reports” in the right margin.

In the Minutes it says “Councillor Hart commented, as requested by Councillor Greenslade, on progress with the HOSW devolution bid and advised that a response to repeated requests for a meeting with the Minister to discuss the HOSW bid was still awaited. He recognised the increasing concerns expressed over the imposition of a Mayoral system about which as yet there was no clarification and reiterated his view that any final proposal must be beneficial to Devon.”

In the webcast he is a lot more outspoken…

Council – Thu, 12th May 2016 – 2:15 pm – Devon County Council Webcasting
http://www.devoncc.public-i.tv/core/share/open/webcast/0/0/0/222091/222091/webcast/0/0/0

Indeed Councillor Hart is scathing about current devolution deals – he calls them “an absolute shambles”, says he can see nothing good in current deals that ALL require a Mayor to release money (around £30 million) which is guaranteed only for 5 years [though documents are drafted for 30 years].

He said he had three times asked for a meeting with the Minister and only after doing TV interviews about his concerns, was he telephoned by one of the Minister’s Special Advisers ( who was, he said, probably about 25 and with two degrees and nothing else) offered a 15 minute meeting in London. He refused it and said he would not make the journey for less than a 30 minute meeting.

He did a good resume of devolution deal fiascos from Derbyshire to Bristol via East Anglia, all of them falling at hurdles that Owl, and many others, had seen coming as soon as we learned what was going on.

He mentioned business rates – the raising of which was another carrot being dangled at LEPs, but pointed out they could only be raised by a maximum 2p in the pound and only if the business community agreed.

It seems Councillor Hart will proceed no further without much more assurance about what’s in it for Devon.

One glaring omission from his statement was public engagement, which he did not mention at all.

Let’s hope he cannot be bought off by “weasel words”.

Unlike our own council leader who, given responsibility for housing (i.e developers) couldn’t sign us away quick enough.

Why is Babcock, the arms manufacturer involved in monitoring school attendance in Devon?

“Babcock International Group plc is a multinational corporation headquartered in the United Kingdom, which specialises in support services managing complex assets and infrastructure in safety- and mission-critical environments. Although the company has civil contracts, its main business is with public bodies, particularly the UK Ministry of Defence and Network Rail. The company has four operating divisions with overseas operations based in Africa, North America & Australia.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babcock_International

It has contracted to Devon County Council to monitor school attendance. Why – your guess is as good as Owl’s – perhaps it is a way od refining some sort of surveillance software!

The new partnership will deliver the following key services:

School Improvement; including
a dedicated school improvement advisory team,
curriculum support,
school data and assessment and school governor support;
Curriculum Enrichment; including digital media facilities, outdoor learning, school library and music services;

Inclusion Services and Learner Support: including educational psychology and Special Educational Needs;

Workforce Training and Development; including leadership, supporting and promoting continuous professional development and working with Newly Qualified Teachers;

Business Management and Resources; including finance, contracts, quality management, personnel and resources;

Alex Khan, Managing Director of Babcock’s Education and Training business said: “Being chosen by Devon County Council as provisional preferred bidder builds on our proven track record in delivering improved educational outcomes for all pupils and reducing overall costs for local authorities which is becoming an increasingly vital factor in the delivery of local services.

“We look forward to applying our unique educational management expertise and experience in Devon. Our approach is already delivering improved outcomes and reducing costs for our other local authority partnerships.””

https://www.babcockinternational.com/News/Babcock%20awarded%20Devon%20schools%20contract

The company sends threatening letters, mentioning fines of £2,500 and more to anyone whose child’s attendance has fallen before a bar that they and DCC sets, whatever the reason.

What is an arms manufacturer doing in education?

There is a change.org petition:

Babcock International is a weapon manufacturer operating around the globe. They are also contracted by Devon County Council to monitor and produce reports on school attendance.

After ten sessions (five days) of “unauthorised absence” they send this letter threatening a fine of up to £2500 and/or three months in prison.
The letter is sent to hundreds of parents each year, causing disproportionate distress for what, in many cases, is a single case of illness or forgetting to inform the school in time.

Children become worried that their mum or dad might go to prison. Parents worry their children might be taken into care, that they might lose their jobs, businesses, dignity and freedom.

The threat, and potential fine and imprisonment, disproportionately affects single parents and poor people, who are less able to pay a Fixed Penalty Notice within 21 days (after which it doubles).

I have personally supported a single mum who was working full-time, raising two children, starting a business and having to comfort her children who thought that Mum was going to prison.

Babcock’s business is in fear, not in children’s education.

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/devon-county-council-get-weapons-manufacturers-out-of-education

A good example of Local Enterprise Partnership smoke and mirrors

A Devon County Council website cites two recent avenues for funding:

Learning and Skills: Developing Higher Level Skills (European Social Fund)

Posted on 11 May 2016

A total of £2.8m ESF funding is available in the Heart of the South West LEP area to develop and deliver a range of activities to support those least likely to enter higher education. There is also an expectation that … Continue reading →

Skill for Growth: supporting SME Development (European Social Fund)

Posted on 11 May 2016

ESF funding is available for projects in the Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) area for projects which support high-level skills and higher-value employment in the Smart Specialisation areas of economic activity through improving the labour market … Continue reading →

Now, doesn’t that rather give you the impression that our LEP has at least £2.8m – and maybe more at its disposal, thanks to the EU, to dispense in Devon and Somerset and that you should negotiate with them for a share of it?

Unfortunately, not.

Reading on you see that, yes, these funds are available from the European Union – but you can go direct to the EU to apply for them – with no guarantee of success and without ever involving the LEP or Devon County Council.

It seems that, increasingly, wherever funds are available that just happen to include Devon and Somerset, from whatever source and whatever the wider geographical area, it is attributed to somehow being available thanks to our Heart of the Southwest Local Enterprise Partnership and gives the impression that they are somehow involved in both acquiring and disseminating said moolah.

Whereas the reality is that they, and Devon County Council, are simply acting as publicists of grant funding information via their web pages from third parties with no direct links at all to the LEP. Something anyone can do.

Owl could advertise that X amount of money is available in Owl’s hunting ground …

But is this added value? Is it transparent?

Moulding new Chairman of Devon County Council

How ever will he find the time to regenerate Axminster?

And remember Stuart Hughes was sacked from an EDDC committee because he was deemed “too busy” with his EDDC and DCC jobs!

Still, he has got Cloakham Lawn sorted to his satisfaction.

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Devon-County-Council-appoints-new-chairman/story-29265721-detail/story.html

“The UK needs to rethink its approach to the upholding of standards in public life”

“Is it time to re-think the UK’s public integrity strategy? Alan Doig argues that a new approach should be considered to take over from successive iterations of an increasingly ineffectual Committee on Standards in Public Life”:

http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=21687

DCC leader doesn’t know if devolution will force a Mayor on us and, if so, what benefit it will bring – if any

John Hart, Leader DCC on Spotlight this evening saying he has written “six or seven letters” asking the Government if the Heart of the Southwest Local Enterprise Partnership devolution bid must include a Mayor for Devon and Somerset and, if so, “what extra benefits would it bring, if any?”

FOR GOD’S SAKE – SHOULDN’T HE (AND ALL THE OTHER COUNCILS AND THE LEP) HAVE SORTED THIS OUT BEFORE THEY PUT THEIR DEVOLUTION BID IN LAST MONTH!!!!!!

Stuart Hughes – lonely pothole filler of Sidmouth

“Sidmouth’s first ‘road warden’, Councillor Stuart Hughes, has been singing the praises of the scheme, which has, so far, not received the support of people in the town. …

… number of people have taken to the Herald’s Facebook to voice their views on the matter – with one person questioning what they paid their council tax for.

Others also expressed similar objections, asking why residents were being expected to pick up the slack. Another suggested residents ‘on the dole’ should ‘fill a hole’.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/sidmouth_residents_encouraged_to_fix_pot_holes_1_4504507

Claire Wright’s attempt to tighten DCC’s tax avoidance rules hits the buffers – again

Just remember that Independent DCC councillor Claire Wright has been attempting to persuade DCC not to deal with tax dodgers for several months – long before it became a sexy headline:

A disappointed councillor has vowed to carry on fighting for changes to crack down on tax dodgers.

Claire Wright’s motion to Devon County Council (DCC), to see companies declare convictions of tax avoidance, or of using avoidance strategies, when bidding for contracts with the authority, went before cabinet on Wednesday.

However, the matter was deferred for a second time, despite cross-party support from Liberal Democrat and Labour leaders.

The motion sought to lower the threshold for when tax avoidance questions could be asked of companies.

If all corporation tax was collected, it is estimated £380million could have been saved in Devon alone.

Councillor Wright urged Conservative councillors to back the motion and act on the ‘modern scourge’ of tax avoidance by wealthy corporate giants.

“That’s money which could be spent on our schools, our hospitals, children’s services and the elderly. All of these services are horribly underfunded and horribly under pressure,” she said.

“It is really disappointing…It would be so easy for the council to do this. It would literally be changing a couple of questions on a questionnaire.”

Chairing the talks on Wednesday, Councillor John Clatworthy told the meeting that the Cabinet Office had stated the current threshold had been set in order to avoid administrative burdens to low value procurements and small businesses.

He added that the office’s current guidance was also being updated and, since DCC was complying with legislation and government policy, he would be more comfortable waiting for its publication.

“In the meantime, I would like to thank Cllr Wright for bringing this motion to us, but no further action will be taken at this stage,” said Cllr Clatworthy.”

The motion will be put before the full council on May 12.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/vows_made_to_crack_down_on_devon_tax_dodgers_1_4497229

“Foreign aid spending to overtake council funding next year”

“Foreign aid spending will outstrip the amount given to councils to collect bins, install street lights and run local services for the first time next year, official government estimates show.

Forecasts buried in the Treasury’s Budget book reveal that spending on international development will hit £9.3bn in 2017/18 – overtaking local government spending of £8.2bn that year.

Tory MPs questioned whether at a time when councils are under “massive pressure” from cuts it was right to be spending “shedload of taxpayers’ money” on foreign aid. …

… Day-to-day spending at the Department for International Development [Dfid] will increase from £7.2bn to £10.4bn over the next five years, according to Treasury estimated released last month,

Over the same period spending on local government will drop from £10.8bn to £6.2bn as the government cuts central funding for councils. The crossover will happen in 2017/18.

Ministers justified the cut at the time by arguing extra council tax raising powers and the right to keep more money raised from business rates would counter the impact.

However council bosses have reacted with fury at the cuts from Treasury funding and said the new powers will not cover the financial black hole.

Tory MPs reacted with fury to the idea the government is prioritising foreign aid at a time when, bin collection, protection of the elderly and other council-run services are under pressure from the cuts.

Sir Gerald Howarth, a former Tory shadow minister, said: “We are at the point of facing a real crisis in local government where absolutely essential services, such as care for the elderly, are under massive pressure.

“By contrast Dfid is awash with cash and struggling to find ways of pushing this vast shedload of taxpayers’ money out of the door.

“Politics is about priorities. Surely after all the austerity we need to show the British people that we’ve got out priories right? The priority must be to look after the vulnerable citizens at home and to strengthen our defences in the face of very dangerous turbulent world out there.”

The majority of local authorities across the country have taken advantage of new powers to increase council tax by close to 4 per cent in the next financial year, partly to help fund social care.

However the Local Government Association (LGA), which represents councils, said the new powers would not cover the major cuts in centralised funding from Whitehall.

An LGA spokesman said: “Councils are increasingly having to do more with less and to try and protect services, such as caring for the elderly, protecting children and reducing homelessness, in the face of growing demand. This means having less to spend on many of the other services people value, such as filling potholes and funding leisure facilities like pools, gyms and parks, libraries and museums.

“The next few years will continue to be a challenge. While extra council tax flexibilities will help some councils offset some of the funding pressures they face, it will not prevent the need for further cutbacks to local services. Many will continue to have to make significant reductions to local services to plug funding gaps.”

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman defended the decision to spend 0.7 per cent of foreign aid, noting how money had been used to help tackle the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.

Asked about the failure of other rich countries to reach the 0.7 spending level, the spokesman said they should “step up to the plate” and meet the commitment.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/14/foreign-aid-spending-to-overtake-council-funding-next-year/

“Devon New Economy Gathering”

More signs of discontent – this time very local

“WHEN
Saturday, 16 April 2016 from 10:00 to 17:00

WHERE
Exeter Community Centre – 17 St Davids Hill, Exeter EX4 3RG
(Beside Iron Bridge)

Devon New Economy Gathering
organised by Exeter Pound and Exeter Transition

Tickets: £20 / £10 / £5 . Please select tickets according to what you can afford. £10 and £5 tickets are intended primarily for students and claimants.

A day to link organisers, activists, practitioners, and others working for economic change, and to hear about local and regional initiatives.
Join us in making the big shift happen!

There are exciting community-led economic solutions to austerity emerging across the region, as well as effective strategies, innovative projects and energetic collaborators. This is a chance to find out who (else) is working on a new local economy one that is more inclusive, democratically accountable, ecological and creates more wellbeing.

Find collaborators – How can we make it happen (more)?

Share visions for the wider economy to see how our local work fits in, and ways we can work together locally to move forward change in the big picture
Keynote session: launched By Stewart Wallis, Senior Adviser at New Economics Foundation

‘A new economy and how to make it happen’

Topics for discussion could include:

What needs to grow and what doesn’t? Well being and better indicators
Relocalizing money and finance – local currencies and financial institutions
Food for all – affordable and local?
Positive Money, a Green New Deal, banking reform
Fostering local enterprises – Local Enterprise Forum
Management of land for greater equality
Engines of inequality and how to interrupt them
Social enterprises – why are they different; starting them and teaching about them
If not austerity what? What to do about the national debt
Potential of the Devolution agenda
Fossil free Devon – Disinvestment from fossil fuels

To pay in Exeter Pounds or Exe’s, or to request a free ticket, please contact the organiser by email or tel 01647 24789/01392 348105

A childrens workshop will be available for the morning only: Please contact the organizer to enquire or book (by 8th April please)”

Straitgate Quarry update

“Campaigners are calling for a public exhibition on revised proposals for a 100-acre quarry on Ottery’s outskirts that they say could impact thousands.

A controversial application from Aggregate Industries (AI) to extract sand and gravel at Straitgate Farm met with community opposition before it was withdrawn earlier this year.

AI confirmed this week it intends to resubmit plans in April, but will not be holding any further public exhibitions – choosing instead to distribute information leaflets to householders.

Straitgate Action Group was formed to fight the proposed quarry and says that if the company will not be using the narrow Birdcage Lane as its main exit under the revised proposals, HGVs are likely to come straight out on to Exeter Road.

Member Monica Mortimer said: “We have been writing to AI to ask when they will be holding a public exhibition. If they are planning on using the one and only main road in and out of Ottery then it will impact on thousands of people all day every day. It just seems a ludicrous proposal.”

The Straitgate plan relies on a linked application to retain Blackhill Quarry, on Woodbury Common, for processing material – a site that is due to be decommissioned this year. Delays in securing the Ottery site have led to AI submitting a new application for importing reserves from Houndaller (Hillhead) Quarry, near Uffculme, to be processed approximately 26 miles away at Blackhill.

Campaigner and county councillor Claire Wright questioned the sense of transporting sand and gravel so far for processing, with the resulting impact on roads and surrounds.

John Penny, South West estates manager for AI, said that following a review, the company will be resubmitting planning proposals for Straitgate and an extension to processing at Blackhill.

He said: “This is to address concerns raised about the transport of materials. Instead of using the more rural Birdcage Lane to exit the Straitgate site, we will be proposing an alternative site entrance.

“We feel this will provide a safer way for vehicles to enter and exit the site and it shows that we are acting on feedback from the community.”

Mr Penny said the Hillhead Quarry plan would be a temporary measure that the company has applied for ‘to allow the business to maintain aggregate supplies to the Exeter and East Devon construction markets during 2016’.

The plan for Hillhead Quarry is open to consultation until April 7.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/campaigners_call_for_public_exhibition_on_revised_quarry_proposals_for_ottery_1_4470989