Hugo Swire – is he really OUR back bench MP?

Swire wrote on Twitter three hours ago:

Just had an excellent briefing from Saudi Foreign Minister HE Adel Al- Jeubir

Prior to that, his previous tweets were about Venezuela, Bristol University’s research into Lyme Disease and a whinge about the Express and Echo wanting to know where he went on holiday (he refused to tell them). Plus tweets on Brazil, Colombia and Florida.

And where does East Devon fit into his political life one wonders? Is he in denial that he is now just an ordinary back bench MP like hundreds of others?

Tonight there is an important meeting of Sidmouth Town Council to discuss the industrial units that Ford’s want to build on land belonging to Sir John Cave (his former landlord when he deigned to live in East Devon many years ago). Will he be there? In your dreams.

Quite a contrast to our other local MP Neil Parish – who spoke against further development in Feniton, attended local meetings and spoke at the planning inspection where it was turned down.

It seems Swire can’t accept his new demotion and still thinks he’s at the Foreign Office – and he might as well be for the good he has done for his constituency since he was fired by Theresa May along with his other Old Etonian mates George and David.

He always took a strong interest in Middle Eastern affairs – perhaps he sees opportunities for some lucrative consultation work which will keep him away from the trials and tribulations of his so-called constituency.

Our local NHS in crisis

Blogged by Independent DCC Councillor Claire Wright. We await Hugo Swire’s response.

Claire Wright and MP Hugo Swire with protesters at Ottery St Mary hospital on Saturday Ref sho 21-16SH 4964. Picture: Simon Horn.

Claire Wright and MP Hugo Swire with protesters at Ottery St Mary hospital on Saturday Ref sho 21-16SH 4964. Picture: Simon Horn.

Anyone who is keeping up with the news will realise that a growing and serious crisis is enveloping the NHS.

And Devon is at the very heart of it.

It is a crisis that is borne out of many years of successive governments messing about with our health service. In the 10 years that I worked in the NHS under the Labour government, there were two major wasteful reorganisations.

Since I left the health service in 2008, the difficulties in recruiting and retaining clinical staff has rapidly escalated. And funding has been steadily eroded.

GPs are leaving the profession in their droves, there is a mass exodus of nurses – and now junior doctors are said to be reconsidering their positions, with many of those who previously wanted to pursue a career in medicine said to be thinking again.

The government will now (disastrously) remove nurse training bursaries, which is bound to discourage further trainees from applying.

The annual growth funding increase, which used to be around 6 per cent each year has, under the last two conservative governments, flatlined. It comes at a time of more pressure than ever before with more older people who have complex health needs among us. This is especially so in Devon.

On top of this, the conservative government has demanded £22bn of so called efficiency savings. Or cuts, of course. The much vaunted £8bn promised to the NHS will only be supplied if NHS trusts slash £22bn first.

Where from you might wonder? Ask the staff, many of whom are tearing their hair out trying to do an immensely demanding job without adequate resources.

Nationally, alarming and damaging cuts are already taking place, which could easily be replicated in Devon, as we live in one of the top three financially health areas in the country.

Accident and Emergency departments are being closed overnight as a result of staffing problems, with potentially catastrophic consequences as people will need to travel further for life saving treatment.

Across the health service, a deficit of £460m was racked up in the first quarter of 2016/17. But this was only possible thanks to a cash injection of £450m over the same period.

Last year the NHS nationally reported a record deficit of £2.45bn. The disastrous health and social care act, which sold our health service down the river, cost £3bn.

Locally, across Devon if financial problems are not addressed by 2020, our health service will be in debt to the tune of around £440m.

The RD&E NHS Trust alone, has a £20m deficit.

The Royal Cornwall Hospital’s director of finance Karl Simkins told the Western Morning News earlier this year that the financial landscape was “challenging”.

He said: “We planned for a £5.5 million deficit and have ended the year with a £6.9 million deficit,” “The financial position is as challenging as it has ever been.”

A government task force has been drafted in to Devon to radically reduce the debt by cutting services.

As a member of Devon County Council’s health and wellbeing scrutiny committee, I am anxiously awaiting what is on the agenda. Plans are set to be published and consulted on shortly. Councillors are expecting there to be some significant and worrying cuts proposed.

Last month a public consultation was launched in South Devon on closing and selling off four community hospitals.

The team running the Success Regime already seem to be diminishing the role of community hospitals in their documentation I have seen so far. They claim that community hospitals, such as at Sidmouth, Ottery St Mary, Seaton, Exmouth, Honiton and Axminster, do not alleviate bed pressures at the Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital! This is counter intuitive and completely contrary to everything I have heard from medics and nurses up until now.

Ottery St Mary and Axminster Hospitals have already lost their beds of course and Exmouth Hospital looks like it will lose its overnight GP out of hours service.

All of this (and whatever else is to come) is at a time of unprecedented pressure – on beds – on staffing – and on services in general.

A major injection of funding is required to avoid major and widespread closures of services and hospital departments.

This government is, in my opinion, using the austerity argument to deliberately weaken our NHS for their own ideological reasons. They simply don’t believe in the state provision of public services.

Ministers have made a clear choice on how they spend our money. Public services are being slowly and steadily dismantled, while big business continues to enjoy preferential treatment.

David Cameron said in 2010 that he would protect the NHS.

We need to hold our conservative MPs to account on this.

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/a_growing_and_serious_crisis_is_enveloping_our_nhs

So now we know why there are no affordable homes! Only Labour supporters live in them so Tories won’t build them!

“David Cameron and George Osborne refused to build more council houses because it would “create Lab­­­­our voters”, Nick Clegg has revealed.

In a tell-all interview on Coalition life, the former Deputy PM also accused cynical Osborne of shamelessly slashing benefits simply to boost Tory popularity.

Speaking ahead of the publication of his memoirs, Mr Clegg said: “Welfare for Osborne was just a bottomless pit of savings and it didn’t really matter what the human consequences were.

“Focus groups had shown the voters they wanted to appeal to were very anti-welfare and therefore there was almost no limit to those anti-welfare prejudices.”

Mr Clegg said this vote-chasing approach was also behind the Coalition’s dismal failure to build more much-needed social housing.” …

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-cameron-george-osborne-wouldnt-8759040

Well, it makes a sort-of sense in the mad, mad world of Tory politics.

Wonder what Swire has to say about it?

A ‘Sharia’ bond on Richmond House was expected to prevent alcohol being consumed on the premises, but it is now understood a bar could be installed if MPs move in during building works.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3747254/EXC-Drinks-MPs-Politicians-reprieve-six-year-booze-ban-parliament-renovated-officials-say-install-bar-temporary-home.html

Phew … well that’s a relief. Now our MPs can continue their heavily-subsidised-on-our-money boozing in and out of office hours.

We will all rest more comfortably in our beds now that’s sorted won’t we.

Swire: spot what is missing

“I am pleased to be joining my close friends David Cameron, George Osborne and others on the backbenches. I feel deeply honoured and privileged to have served as a Minister of State – one of only three to have done so continuously from 2010- and loved my time both in the Northern Ireland Office and more recently the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

I have travelled more than any other Minister promoting the UK abroad both politically and in terms of trade. I have championed the Commonwealth and re-established links in Latin and Central America. I have been all over Asia, Australasia and the Pacific racking up the air miles and promoting our great country.

But all this comes at a price not only to me but my family and I shall be relieved not to have to embark on yet another exhausting trip for a while.”

https://www.hugoswire.org.uk/news/back-back-benches

Er, what about now having time to work for your constituents and perhaps seeking to relocate your second home from Mid Devon to East Devon?

Oh, Owl forgot – you are on holiday but you won’t tell us where. Still, wherever it is, it won’t be an exhausting trip.

Those air miles are going to be SO useful … for all the family – though as Mr Swire employs his wife in his office who will be answering the phone and the mail?

Hugo doing another Trump! Refuses to engage with Express and Echo

Donald Trump has banned several newspapers from his presidential campaign. Our own dear Hugo – after copying him with Twitter spats with other MPs see earlier posts – has now copied him again, this time severing all ties with the well-respected local Express and Echo newspaper – again announcing it on Twitter on 5 August:

image

(“Severing all ties with Express and Echo newspaper due to consistently biased and inaccurate reporting. Enough is enough”)

It seems that he is highly sensitive to criticism these days (again like Trump) and is dealing only with those newspapers which give him favourable column inches.

It cannot be too long before we hear in one of those rare visits to a Sidmouth shop (almost certainly Waitrose) those (in)famous words “Do you know who I am?”

Yes, indeed we do, indeed we do.

Where’s Hugo? He refuses to tell Express and Echo where he is and has told them not to try contacting him

Local MPs were asked where they were spending their holidays. Exeter MP Ben Bradshaw is too busy to go away but managed a week in Italy earlier in the summer. Neil Parish plans a break in the Wye Valley.

And Hugo Swire? Here is his response:

Hugo Swire did not wish to comment and asked the Echo not to contact him. Can anyone tell us where he’s gone? You can message us on Facebook, Tweet us or email the newsdesk.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/mps-on-tour2k16-where-your-politician-is-off-on-holiday/story-29630524-detail/story.html

What happens when your town falls out of favour with its Local Enterprise Partnership?

Hugo … Neil … where are you …? What is our LEP going to fund in our towns and villages in East Devon?

From Hansard: 21 July 2016

Sir David Amess (Southend West) (Con)

Will my right hon. Friend find time for a debate on the distribution of funds by local enterprise partnerships? The LEP in our area had Southend as No. 4 on its list and we have dropped off the radar dramatically. Something needs to be looked at there.

The Leader of the House of Commons, Mr David Lidington

My understanding is that that was an internal decision by the local enterprise partnership for south Essex, and I encourage my hon. Friend to make representations—I am sure he will do—on behalf of his constituents to the LEP. If that is not successful, I am sure that the relevant Minister in the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy will be keen to hear from him.

https://www.davidamess.co.uk/news/sir-david-calls-debate-local-enterprise-partnerships

Swire: another Twitter spat, trading insults with MP on his own side

And they say Labour has problems:

Michael Fabricant ‏@Mike_Fabricant [Conservative MP]
I see all the meanest attacks on @SteveHiltonx are from the most mediocre former ministers who only kept their positions through croneyism”

Swire’s reply:
I’ve been given the most frightful wigging by @Mike_Fabricant!”

Swire’s reply is a very thinly veiled insult about Mr Fabricant’s hair, which many people believe may be a wig:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-mp-michael-fabricant-admits-3524194

If he keeps this up, he will rival Donald Trump!

Swire does a Trump – Twitter spat with Tim Farron

“The Devon MP nominated for a knighthood in David Cameron’s resignation honours has hit out at Lib Dem leader Tim Farron for his ongoing criticism of the list.

East Devon MP Hugo Swire accused Mr Farron of being “sanctimonious”, following his repeated calls for the list of names to be rejected and the process overhauled.

The less than friendly exchange comes as MPs announce they are investigating Mr Cameron’s chosen recipients, alongside his 13 newly created peers. …

… Mr Farron described it as “so full of cronies it would embarrass a medieval court”. “He is not the first Prime Minister to leave office having rewarded quite so many friends, but he should be the last,” he added.

In an apparent reply to his criticism, Mr Swire sent a tweet stating he “can’t decide who is more tiresome and sanctimonious: [former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life] Sir Alistair Graham or @timfarron”.

Close run thing,” he tweeted.

Mr Farron replied by congratulating the former Foreign Office minister on his award, stating it was “richly deserved”.

Whether this was in sincerity or sarcasm, it prompted one further tweet from Mr Swire: “15 Love to Tim!”.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/devon-mp-engaged-in-twitter-spat-with-tim-farron-over-honours-list/story-29600423-detail/story.html

Owl thinks that Mr Farron’s choice of the word ‘richly’ might just be giving the game away … subtle Tim … subtle … maybe too subtle for Hugo, though!

Sharia law may stop MPs subsidised boozing completely

“MPs considered nationalising a Whitehall pub to avoid a drinking ban while they are relocated to the Department of Health’s offices for the duration of refurbishment works at the Palace of Westminster.

Richmond House, which hosts the department, is one of three government buildings owned by Middle East financiers who have bought into an Islamic bond issued by the government. One of its stipulations is that no alcohol will be sold on the premises.

To get around the restriction, some MPs proposed taking the Red Lion pub, located between parliament and Richmond house, into public ownership and banning entry to the general public. However, according to the Times, the move was opposed by Fuller’s Inns, the Red Lion’s owners, and a parliamentary subcommittee eventually ruled out the proposal.

Alternative drinking arrangements will still need to be made for MPs and peers – who at Westminster can choose from 10 licensed bars and restaurants – when they are moved out for the building’s renovation from 2020 onwards.

David Cameron, the former prime minister, unveiled the Islamic bond, known as a Sukuk, in 2013, as part of a drive to raise cash from Islamic investors, who cannot buy into interest-paying government bonds because of religious rules against usury.

Instead, the £200m bond sees investors effectively take ownership of three government buildings – Richmond House, Wellington House and a third Whitehall property – and take rent from the UK government for their use.

However, the small print of the deal means that the buildings must be run according to the principles of sharia law. Any attempt to serve alcohol in the buildings could lead to a conflict with investors. …

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/06/mps-wanted-to-nationalise-westminster-pub-for-their-own-use

“No other prime minister will hand out resignation honours after Cameron debacle, head of sleaze watchdog says”

“No future prime minister will publish a resignation list of honours after the “public outcry” over David Cameron’s controversial choices, Theresa May’s ethical standards adviser has said.

Lord Bew, who chairs the Committee on Standards in Public Life, told the Sunday Telegraph that the idea of prime ministers handing out honours to friends when they leave office is “over”.

He also appeared hit out at some people who enter the House of Lords but fail to contribute, insisting that a peerage must be a “job” and not an “honour”.

The criticism comes as Mrs May attempts to draw a line under the row by insisting she wants a more accountable honours system than the one pursued under her predecessor. … “

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/06/no-other-prime-minister-will-hand-out-resignation-honours-after/

Widespread “disgust” at Swire “honour”

Owl is not at all surprised that Swire accepted the “honour” as unless and until his cronies get back into power, it is his only opportunity. Presumably, after pledging allegiance to his Eton cronies and having served only briefly as Mrs May’s PPS in Parliament a few years ago, she was quite certain she did not want him around.

Remember, this is the chap who “went to” St Andrews University but did not get a degree, “joined” the army but served only very briefly, had a couple of non-jobs in family-owned firms before becoming an MP, made fun of people on benefits and spent nearly £500 on a Mulberry iPad cover that he expected us to pay for (but which he ended up having to pay for himself.

In a widely-derided and disparaged honours list, he fits right in with all the others!

The Express and Echo and Claire Wright’s view:

Hugo Swire, wealthy politician and close chum of David Cameron has been criticised after being awarded a knighthood.

Devon County Councillor Claire Wright called the move “jaw-dropping”.

Hugo Swire, East Devon MP, has come under fire for being named in the former prime minister’s controversial honours list. The reasons for his knighthood are cited as “for political and public service”.

But dozens of his constituents are challenging the decision, asking what Swire has actually done to deserve the title.

County Councillor Claire Wright, who stood against Swire in the 2015 General Election, said she found it ironic the politician was knighted just weeks after he was resigned to the backbenches. She said: “On July 19 Mr Swire blogged that he was joining his “close friends” David Cameron and George Osborne on the back benches.

“Ironically, just two weeks later Mr Cameron announces that our MP will be knighted. Quite a few people have been asking what Mr Swire has done to deserve this. To my knowledge he has never voted against the party line to support his constituents.

Some residents are also challenging the decision, asking what Swire has done for their constituency. One man challenged the decision publicly, and wrote to Swire: “Can I ask why you have received this?” One woman said: “I am disgusted. He has continually voted for cuts to welfare and benefits and yet he has the nerve to accept this,” Another wrote, on learning the news: “You have got to be taking the Michael.” Ian Humphries, who lives in Exmouth, wrote on Facebook: “He certainly doesn’t deserve it, he’s done nothing for East Devon.”

Swire himself said he would now have more time for his constituency after he was sacked from his ministerial post last month.

Beforehand he served as Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Minister of State for Northern Ireland which meant, he said, that he had less time for his constituency area.

Cllr Wright said she had seen no evidence that Swire had voted in favour of his constituency against his party in the past. She shamed the list as being “filled” with Cameron’s “old boy network of friends and Tory party donors.

She said: “The former prime minister’s honours list which is filled with his old boy network friends and Tory party donors corrupts the entire system of honours and reflects badly on the conservative government. I firmly believe that knighthoods, peerages and other honours should only be bestowed on people who have given exceptional public service for the greater good.”

Cameron has been widely criticised in the national press for showering a total of 46 former aides, advisers and ministers with honours in a resignation list. Tim Farron, leader of the Liberal Democrat Party, said it was embarrassing.

“David Cameron’s resignation honours list is so full of cronies it would embarrass a medieval court. He is not the first Prime Minister to leave office having rewarded quite so many friends, but he would be the last.”

A Devon man who was keen to point out bizarre appointments of honours was Paul Baker. He wrote on Facebook: “Worst still, Sam Cam’s sister just for being her sister and the woman who suggested George Osborne went on a diet. True one nation Conservatism.”

Some on social media were not so critical of Swire’s knighthood. He also received dozens of tweets from those happy with his news. Ahmed Naseem, former foreign minister for the Maldives, wrote: “Congratulations sir, we in the Maldives value your efforts to bring back democracy we lost in the last four years.”

While Tony de Brum, former foreign minister for the republic Marshall Islands, shared a joke. He said: “Congratulations Hugo, you are a friend of the islands – even when our dry cleaners shrunk your suit.”

Former city councillor John Harvey congratulated him and said it was well deserved.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/disgust-as-hugo-swire-mp-is-awarded-knighthood-by-chum-david-cameron/story-29589285-detail/story.html

Tim Farron: Cameron’s honours list “so full of cronies it would embarrass a medieval court”

The Liberal Democrat leader has called for an end to resignation honours and peerages.

He said: “David Cameron’s resignation honours list is so full of cronies it would embarrass a medieval court.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/04/david-camerons-full-honours-list-revealed/

Honours: “…backdoor state funding of parties for the re-election of incumbents”

“Research for the Committee on Standards in Public Life said individual large donations created ‘questions’ about alleged rewards of honours and peerages”

“[The researcher] added that the use of public funds for partisan political purposes was a further major challenge, reporting: ‘At almost all levels of elective politics, incumbents have become entitled to public money to aid them in their duties to their electors.

‘There is a tendency to use some of this money as a form of backdoor state funding of parties and for the re-election of incumbents.’

Mr Pinto-Duschinsky said it was crucial to re-examine the role of the Electoral Commission and other regulators such as the Charity Commission.
The row over Mr Cameron’s resignation honours – a traditional opportunity for departing prime minister’s to reward allies – has renewed calls for reform to the honours system.

Anger has been focused on moves by Mr Cameron to reward major party donors from his decade as Tory leader – with one, Ian Taylor, declining a knighthood, and another Michael Spencer, being blocked from the House of Lords by officials.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3724000/Political-parties-dangerously-reliant-mega-donors-raises-questions-alleged-sale-honours-standards-watchdog-warns.html

And it’s official – arise Sir Hugo!

Claire Wright and MP Hugo Swire with protesters at Ottery St Mary hospital on Saturday Ref sho 21-16SH 4964. Picture: Simon Horn.

Claire Wright and MP Hugo Swire with protesters at Ottery St Mary hospital on Saturday Ref sho 21-16SH 4964. Picture: Simon Horn.

Rewarded for … er … doing the job he was already handsomely paid for at the Foreign Office … whilst saying he could not speak for East Devon in Parliament … and being a very good friend and former schoolmate of David Cameron.

And that’s all.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/04/david-camerons-full-honours-list-revealed/

P.S. Owls don’t give or accept honours, even if the Owl went to Hogwarts – just so you know.

Would YOU accept an honour described as ” a very British corruption”?

Hugo Swire is widely rumoured to be on David Cameron’s resignation honours list to receive a knighthood. The two Old Etonians are such good friends David Cameron felt able to give him a playful slap on the bottom at a recent government reception:

image

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/11946721/David-Cameron-caught-on-camera-giving-minister-slap-on-bottom-at-State-banquet.html

Here is what another (former) pal of the PM says:

“resignation honours list a “very British corruption”, says ex-PM’s pal Steve Hilton.

David Cameron’s bid to dish out gongs to Tory donors is “a serious type of very British corruption” – according to one of his oldest political pals.

Former Downing Street strategy guru Steve Hilton hit out at his chum’s attempts to reward party backers, which has triggered huge public anger.

The former Tory leader wants to hand accolades including knighthoods and peerages to 48 cronies .

But Mr Hilton, who was the PM’s director of strategy from 2010-12, launched a scathing attack on the plan.

He said: “ David Cameron ‘s resignation honours list is a symptom of a wider problem: our corrupt and decaying democracy. …”

Bring back regular public meetings with politicians and public servants!

An article in today’s Guardian suggests that we need more accountability and transparency from those in public office and suggests that one way to do this is to ensure that our public servants and politicians are put on the spot more often by being expected to attend regular public meetings to explain themselves.

Not the carefully scripted and whipped official committee meetings, where the agenda is tightly controlled and policed, when many of them keep quiet and vote or act like sheep – but situations where they must think on their feet and tell us what they REALLY think (if they think at all).

Imagine if, say once a month, an individual councillor or officer or MP had to be available in the community to answer questions from local electors without warning of what those questions might be!

A few would definitely acquit themselves well – but a great majority in East Devon would definitely be floundering at the first question and thereafter!

An intriguing idea!

” … But social media have not destroyed the public meeting. They have done the opposite. Twitter, Facebook and the rest are indirectly responsible for the glorious revival of the gathering where real people meet in a physical place. For some of us, sitting behind a computer is not enough. We need to get out. What is beyond doubt is that the old-fashioned forum of the public meeting is back and is the perfect counter to social media.


For at least two decades, politicians assumed that a soundbite on the TV news bulletin was what mattered. Oratory as a part of the repertoire disappeared. Politics became technocratic rather than the art form it partly must be. The glory of the public meeting is that there is no escape. A speaker must deliver. The audience is composed of real people. The speaker cannot hide away tweeting alone in a room. People want to be there and need to be there, to be together out of curiosity or as part of what they see as a cause. … ”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug/03/new-big-thing-politics-old-style-public-meeting-labour-battleground-live-events

David Cameron honours list = cronyism?

Will good friend Hugo Swire, rumoured for a knighthood, accept his “honour”? You bet he will! Though this honours list will probably be forever tainted with a rather unpleasant smell, rather like the list of Harold Wilson (nicknamed the “Lavender List”) so many years ago, which is still remembered to this day:

The list caused controversy as a number of recipients were wealthy businessmen whose principles were considered antithetical to those held by the Labour Party at the time. Roy Jenkins notes that Wilson’s retirement “was disfigured by his, at best, eccentric resignation honours list, which gave peerages or knighthoods to some adventurous business gentlemen, several of whom were close neither to him nor to the Labour Party.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_Prime_Minister%27s_Resignation_Honours

Of the honours today there is a bit of a difference: the disputed honours are those to donors of very large sums to the Conservative party whose tax arrangements have been brought into the spotlight and found wanting and to his “mates”:u

“… BBC political correspondent Iain Watson said there was little doubt the current regime at Downing Street were uncomfortable with the extent of Mr Cameron’s proposed list, but they believe it is for the Cabinet Office and honours committee to pronounce on its propriety …”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36938368