Our LEP need an “Interim Head of Strategy” – just three days to apply!

“Interim Head of Strategy and Operations
Competitive remuneration [nowhere does it mention what the actual salary is]

The Heart of the South West LEP is a strong and dynamic partnership between the private sector, local authorities, universities and further education across Somerset, Devon, Plymouth and Torbay.

We have established an impressive track record leading and influencing economic growth, job creation and prosperity across the Heart of the South West.

This is an exciting time to be joining a Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) – work is underway with our partners developing a devolution deal with Government and at the same time rolling out our pipeline of £500m of investments. Reporting to the Chief Executive, this role leads a small core team in the LEP and working collaboratively with a wide range of other staff in our partners.

As a key member of the LEP’s senior management team, the role also directs LEP strategy (and development of our LEP wide devolution productivity plan), investment programme management and ramping up our engagement and communications with stakeholders to ensure we maximise our impact whilst developing the partnerships needed to build the global distinctiveness of our economy.

The ideal candidate will have senior level experience of working collaboratively with public and private sector partners on economic development or strategic economic plans / programmes in a fast paced, high profile environment. Experience of facilitating cluster development in a similar organisation would also be an advantage.

Also sought is the ability to commence work quickly to support development work on our devolution deal; an initial contract (or secondment opportunity) for a year is on offer.

Please provide your CV and details of remuneration or daily rate sought, by email to janet.powell@heartofswlep.co.uk.

Closing date: 15 May 2016
The LEP follows Somerset County Council Equalities Policies”

Why is Exeter not represented at the LEP yet East Devon is?

As long ago as March 2011 Exeter City Council CEO Karime Hassan knew exactly how our LEP would be constituted and who would be on it and was making this complaint and prediction:

The Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership, which is currently awaiting government approval, has come under fire at an Insider panel debate for failing to properly represent Exeter and its economy in its proposed form.

Speaking at an Insider breakfast debate held the University of Exeter’s Reed Hall, Exeter City Council’s economic development director Karim Hassan pointed out that his council does not have a seat at the table of the Heart of the South West LEP. “I don’t see how Exeter and its growth point can therefore get the messages out there to government that can make a difference,” said Hassan.

He went on: “LEPs need to work effectively, but the prospects aren’t necessarily good. The Heart of the South West LEP already looks like it holds tensions in it, because the needs of cities like Exeter are different from the needs of the rural market towns of Devon and Somerset. It is hard to tell one story to central government because there are so many different localised agendas built into an LEP like this.”

Hassan also said the South West had to work at getting better at arguing its case for a slice of the national cake. “We have lost out many times to others elsewhere, who have been better organised. But the region has not always worked well together, with too much internal competition and rivalry, so this new LEP structure is a real challenge. We have already seen the competitive element surface, with Cornwall’s decision to go it alone with its LEP.”

Others on the panel also saw gaps in the proposed LEP arrangements. Ben de Cruz, senior partner at accountancy firm Haines Watts, said: “It certainly looks like the Heart of the South West LEP proposal will be accepted by the government, but the biggest problem with LEPs is that the funding they will have is still unclear.”

And de Cruz said it would be harder to make strategic decisions in the basis of more local interests. “The South West RDA, for all its shortcomings, was able to look at the bigger picture when assessing projects or funding proposals. Once things are divided up – into Cornwall, Devon and Somerset combined, the West of England, and so on – the question is how wider issues will be tackled. It feels like co-operation will be required, but no-one knows quite how that will work.”

Hassan added that he wanted LEPs to work well but was unsure whether this would happen in practice. “Whitehall needs intelligence, and the LEPs could be that vehicle,” he said. “But equally I’m fearful that the LEP won’t deliver the information it needs to.

“A LEP should be able to prioritise investments, but it will need to work in a clear, transparent way. Potentially it could make a big difference. But first we need to grab the opportunity – partly by getting Exeter fully involved in the planning for the Heart of the South West LEP.”

https://www.insidermedia.com/insider/southwest/50007-

Now, it could be argued that Cranbrook (officially in East Devon and just getting off the ground) was the dealmaker – but, in fact, the town is much closer to Exeter than most other East Devon towns.

Why was there not a seat for Exeter as the county town?

Hinkley C: we could end up selling our highly subsidised electricity cheaply – to France!

Physicist claims Hinkley Point deal means UK taxpayer could get £53bn bill to supply cheap nuclear energy to France

Electricity from planned nuclear plant ‘could all end up being exported to countries with fewer renewables, like France, at a price massively subsidised by Britain’s hard-working bill payers’.

It is a claim that, if true, would mean Britain is about to make one of the biggest economic mistakes in its history, a blunder that would damage our country’s finances for decades and almost inevitably cause the Government to fall.

For, according to Keith Barnham, an emeritus professor of physics, the total subsidy paid to the planned Hinkley Point nuclear power station by the British taxpayer could reach a staggering £53 billion over its lifetime – and the main beneficiaries will be French.

He argues that such is the likely growth of renewables that the UK will not actually need the Hinkley’s electricity, so it will be sold abroad. And, he says, the most likely customers are in France, home of energy giant EDF, which is expected to build the plant. …

… If Hinkley starts in 2025 with the performance Department for Energy and Climate Change expects, the nuclear subsidy will be around £820m each year on the ‘no-subsidy’ renewable scenario.

“The subsidy will double should the second Hinkley reactor come on stream around 2030, leading to a total bill, over the 35 years of the guarantee, of £53bn, which could all end up supporting low electricity prices abroad.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hinkley-point-nuclear-power-station-france-edf-subsidy-53bn-professor-keith-barnham-a7021161.html

Hinkley C: EDF works council demands independent report on project

“EDF’s works council said on Monday it had voted to order an external study into the French utility’s project to build two nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point in Britain.

The works council said it was missing key information and ordered the study to help it to prepare a recommendation about the 18 billion pound (23 billion euros) project.

EDF’s main unions want the company to delay the Hinkley Point project by three years, the time they say is needed to finish other nuclear projects in France and China.

The works council did not say when the study would be ready or when it expected to make its recommendation, which will not be binding on EDF.

EDF chief executive Jean-Bernard Levy said late last month that Hinkley Point would be launched once the works council had issued its recommendation.

Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron has said he expected a final investment decision in September.

EDF declined to comment.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3581281/EDF-works-council-votes-independent-study-Hinkley-point.html

“The UK needs to rethink its approach to the upholding of standards in public life”

“Is it time to re-think the UK’s public integrity strategy? Alan Doig argues that a new approach should be considered to take over from successive iterations of an increasingly ineffectual Committee on Standards in Public Life”:

http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=21687

Hinkley C: UN says UK in breach of consultation on environmental risks

“The British government has run into a major new problem with the Hinkley Point C nuclear project, with a United Nations committee ruling that the UK failed to consult European countries properly over potential environmental risks.

Documents seen by the Guardian show Britain “is in non-compliance with its obligations” (page 21) to discuss the possible impact of any accident or other event that could affect those nations in proximity to Hinkley.

This is just the latest in a string of problems connected with the planned £18bn project to construct new reactors in Somerset, with the developer EDF of France recently delaying a final investment decision till September.

Paul Dorfman, a senior researcher at UCL’s energy institute, said the ruling from the UN Economic and Social Council throws great uncertainty over Hinkley.

“This is a huge blow to the government and introduces a whole new element of doubt over the scheme. It is hard to see how EDF can sign off any final investment decision whilst the government has yet to resolve this important issue.”

But the Department of Energy and Climate Change said it was convinced that the government had done all it had to do.

“Compliance with international obligations is something we take very seriously,” said a spokesman.

“We are confident that we have met the relevant international requirements in relation to Hinkley Point C. We have world-leading nuclear safety regulations in the UK, which Hinkley Point C would have to comply with.”

The British courts have in the past ruled against An Taisce (the Irish National Trust) which tried to block Hinkley on the grounds of insufficient consultation over the same safety issues. Dorfman said he expected a new legal challenge using the UN ruling.

The British government has been arguing for some years inside the committee with Continental countries saying in the past that it did not have to consult them because there was little or no likelihood of “significant transboundary environmental impacts.”

But Austria in particular has said that there should have been consultation because of the possibility of a severe accident that could lead to radioactive materials being spread by wind across Europe.

The Netherlands, Norway and Ireland have also argued they should have been consulted about Hinkley; the committee has finally agreed with them.

It recommends the UK “enter into discussions with possibly affected parties, including parties that cannot exclude a significant adverse transboundary impact from the activity at HPC, in order to agree on whether notification is useful at the current stage.”

Nuclear safety has been back in the public eye with the 30th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident last month and the recent fifth anniversary of the Fukushima crisis in March remembered.

Hinkley is the first new atomic plant planned in the UK for two decades and is a flagship project promoted at the very highest level of government. But confidence has been undermined by a range of problems.

Last week former EDF finance director, Thomas Piquemal, told a French parliamentary hearing that he had resigned in March because he believed Hinkley threatened the financial health of the energy company.

“Who would bet 60 to 70% of his equity on a (European Pressurised Reactor) technology that has not yet proven that it can work and which takes 10 years to build,” he said.

“In January 2015, I proposed to negotiate a three-year delay with our client because we reasoned that it would weigh too heavily on EDF’s balance sheet,” Piquemal said.

Since Piquemal’s resignation, EDF has announced a €4bn (£3.2bn) capital increase and the government has agreed to forego cash dividends for two years, generating an estimated €7bn euros in extra capital.

But while EDF has been coming up with plans to strengthen its capital, its even more financially troubled engineering partner, Areva, has run into deeper problems and its share price is now nearly 50% below where it was 12 months ago.

The French nuclear regulator, ASN, said it had been informed by Areva that its investigation had found evidence of irregularities in about 400 components produced since 1965, of which some 50 are believed to be in use in French nuclear plants.

Areva, which is in the middle of a merger with EDF, has already found faults at a new reactors it is constructing at Flamanville in Normandy. That scheme, like another at Olkiluoto in Finland, is using an EPR like the one planned for Hinkley and is both massively delayed and over budget.”

http://gu.com/p/4jx7e

Our Local Enterprise Partnership consulted no-one when it decided to put all Devin and Somerset’s financial eggs in Hinkley C’s basket.

Not really surprising when a good number of its members have nuclear business interests.

Chinese to increase their stake in Hinkley C?

“A Chinese state-backed nuclear energy firm is considering taking a stake in the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, one of its officials has said.

The Chinese National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC), along with another Chinese company CGN, had previously been in talks with EDF over investing in the scheme, but only CGN signed a deal.

Now a CNNC official has told The Sunday Telegraph that CNNC’s involvement is also in the offing and CGN had held talks on their behalf.

Xie Jiajie said: “The final proposal is for the Chinese to take a 33.5% stake in the project. “But this will be a combination of CGN and CNNC. “We haven’t decided what percentage we are going to invest.”

The return on any investment could amount to billions of dollars but the Chinese company said it would not announce the final figure until EDF’s final investment decision on the project is made.

The Sunday Telegraph said CNNC’s involvement was likely to be controversial because of its close ties to the Chinese government [and the Chinese military].

The Hinkley Point nuclear power plant in Somerset could ultimately produce 7% of British electricity and create 25,000 jobs, according to EDF.

It had been due to start producing electricity in 2023, but progress has been beset by delays because of funding problems.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-3579196/Chinese-government-backed-firm-considering-Hinkley-Point-stake.html

Looks like the skills our LEP should be investing in are Mandarin and French lessons for nuclear power engineers.

And maybe some cyber-security experts who can program in those languages.

It has already been reported that UK spy centre GCHQ has sought talks with Chinese companies involved to attempt to allay security concerns.

Still, it’s reassuring to know that GCHQ is fairly close to Hinkley C if anything untoward happens.

And now, for our next LEP smoke and mirrors event …

From this month’s Heart of the South West LEP newsletter:

Another area of cross LEP partnership is the Nuclear South West partnership between HotSW, West of England, GFirst LEPs and Business West. Set up with the aim to build business legacy on the existing opportunities in the nuclear sector on the back of Hinkley Point C; but not exclusively related to Hinkley. We’ll have more news on the progress of this new initiative next time.”

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com

You want to know more about “Nuclear South West”?

Nuclear South West launched on 22 September, as a not- for- profit initiative to enable businesses to network, facilitate supply chain development, share knowledge and most importantly secure new business.
The launch was an opportunity, not only to explain how Nuclear South West will be responsive to the needs of its members, but for the industry to articulate what it wants out of this much-needed nuclear sector business platform.

The benefits of membership will include regular events and training, networking and partnering, information and intelligence, promotional opportunities and access to key industry areas, not only new build, but decommissioning and defence also.

Gareth Davies, Director of Davies Nuclear Associates said:

“The launch was a great success, perfectly timed on the back of the government’s loan guarantee of £2billion to help fund the construction of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station. With some 150 potential members in attendance, there is a real interest in getting the network off the ground and making it a success. We look forward to working with Business West and spreading the word about the vast range of future opportunities in the nuclear sector.”

http://www.businesswest.co.uk/press-office/news-and-press/2015/09/25/south-west-businesses-gear-up-for-nuclear

or

The Launch
Nuclear South West launched on 22 September at Leigh Court in Bristol with some 150 potential members in attendance. Phil Smith (Business West) and Gareth Davies (Davies Nuclear Associates) told the crowds about the benefits coming up – including events, training, networking, partnering, information and intelligence, promotional opportunities and access to key industry areas.
What’s Next?
Our new membership offer has been set and we have a programme of events lined up.
We offer a simple rate structure, focusing on just 4 sizes of company based on turnover and if you join before 30 June 2016, we’re offering a 20% discount on rates.
Just fill out our simple application form and we’ll get back to you.
http://www.businesswest.co.uk/membership/nuclear-south-west”

So, it’s basically a subscription networking service that allows Business South West and Davies Nuclear Services to flog its wares to anyone who pays up to join.

Any wiser? However, it does mention that they are in partnership with Davies Nuclear Associates, which turns out to be a private management consultancy, whose website has one page which states:

“We help our clients grow their businesses in the UK energy sector.
We do this by providing specialist management consultancy support and insight.
Under construction.
Come back soon”

http://www.dna-energy.com/

It seems a Gareth Davies owns the company and has done so since 2013, and yet it has no informative website, though Mr Davies is on Linkedin:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/gareth-davies-916a9121

and the only other director is Simon Hayhurst, the Company Secretary on whom there is no information.

So, the LEP joins Nuclear South West which is really a joint venture between Business South West and Davies Nuclear Consulting to …. well, get other people to pay to join them with the promise that they will open doors to offer:

“Supply chain development from both sides – either developing the one you have or getting you into a new one.

Bringing business together to network and share knowledge.

Maximising opportunities to support regional growth.

Women in Nuclear – working with Women in Nuclear (WiN) network

Future talent – working with Young Generators Network (YGN) and Young Chamber to develop the talent to power our nuclear sector in years to come.”

Anyone see anything tangible taking place here that benefits us lesser mortals in Devon?

Answers on a postcard …

Devolution – councillors watch your steps

” …Combined authorities will need to ensure that they are starting with a foundation of strong governance. In our latest thought leadership report on devolution, Our changing state: the realities of austerity and devolution it is suggested that, as a minimum, they should consider the following for their constitutional documents:

be clear about the limits of the powers of the mayor as opposed to those of the authority;

the extent to which any decisions of the authority require anything beyond a majority vote;

clarity as to how far the authority can go to “co-opt” or otherwise involve non-voting representatives of stakeholder organisations;

when and how will the authority consult on issues;

and

where complaints should be directed.

The drive for devolution is currently strong at all levels of public authority but the real goal is to be able to get into the detail with the confidence that decisions will be made properly. In that respect, a lot of the work has only just begun.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26744%3Acombined-authorities-accountability-is-key&catid=59&Itemid=27

“Nuclear reactors could have faulty French components”

Plans to build an £18 billion nuclear power station in Somerset were thrown into chaos after the admission that engineers may have falsified vital safety tests.

The revelation plunged the French nuclear industry into a new crisis, prompting fears that dozens of reactors in France and possibly the UK could be dangerous.

Britain’s nuclear safety regulator, the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), said last night that it was seeking answers from EDF, the troubled state-owned electricity company planning to build two European pressurised reactors at Hinkley Point.

The ONR said that it was “aware of reports of possible falsification of manufacturing and quality control” at a French state-owned factory that has manufactured key components used in more than half of France’s 58 nuclear reactors. The factory, owned by the collapsed nuclear reactor manufacturer Areva, is due to produce the reactors to be used at Hinkley.

“We have been in contact with [EDF] with regard to any applicability to Hinkley Point C,” a spokeswoman said. She added that the ONR was seeking additional information about the possibility that unverified components manufactured at the Areva plant in Le Creusot, Burgundy, may have been installed by EDF at some of the 15 reactors it owns in Britain.

A spokeswoman for Areva, a sister company of EDF, acknowledged that there were questions over the safety and reliability of France’s nuclear industry. “Obviously, this is a major issue in terms of confidence,” she said. “We have got our people mobilised to bring transparency here, and we are determined to do that.”
f
Areva admitted on Monday that information on the safety of the reactor pressure vessels it has been making for French nuclear plants since the 1960s is either missing or wrong.

Philippe Knoche, Areva chief executive, said that he could not rule out falsification. There have been claims that the errors may have been a deliberate attempt to mislead the French nuclear watchdog, ASN.

“We can neither confirm nor exclude potential falsifications,” a spokesman said, amid fears of possible flaws in its practices and quality control.

Mycle Schneider, an expert on the French nuclear industry, said that hundreds of large components manufactured at the Le Creusot plant were not properly accounted for. About 50 are believed to be in use inside French nuclear power stations but smaller components could be in reactors owned by EDF in Britain, he said. A similar scandal in Japan in 2005 led to the shutdown of 17 nuclear reactors.

“This puts into question the entire chain of quality control and safety inspections in France,” he said.

France’s reactors generate almost 80 per cent of the country’s electricity.
Areva collapsed last year amid huge debts linked to the botched construction of European pressurised reactors in Finland and Normandy. Documents relating to 10,000 components made in the Le Creusot factory since 1965 are being analysed; so far 400 have revealed anomalies, about half of which relate to nuclear plant parts.

A final decision on Hinkley, designed to provide 7 per cent of the UK’s electricity, has been delayed until September amid fears the cost could cripple EDF.”

thetimes.co.uk | May 4 2016, 1:01am,

“Former CFO wanted EDF to delay Hinkley Point project”

“EDF’s former chief financial officer had urged the utility to delay a final investment decision on building Britain’s Hinkley Point nuclear plant by at least three years, he told France’s parliament on Wednesday.

Thomas Piquemal’s shock resignation in March raised doubts about EDF’s ability to finance the 18 billion pound project in western England but Piquemal had not previously spoken publicly about his reasons for leaving.

“In January 2015, I proposed to negotiate a three-year delay with our client because we reasoned that it would weigh too heavily on EDF’s balance sheet,” Piquemal told a parliament committee hearing.

A visibly emotional Piquemal said he resigned in desperation when it eventually became clear that he would not be able to delay the project.

“I could not sign off on a decision that could one day put EDF in the same situation as Areva, having to recapitalise the company a few months before defaulting on payments,” he said.

Nuclear group Areva — which has agreed to sell its reactor business to EDF — was virtually bankrupt after years of losses wiped out its equity and was rescued by the state.

Piquemal denied reports that he had resigned for personal reasons and said that staying at the utility without speaking out about the risk involved with Hinkley Point would have been “a professional mistake”.

“Who would bet 60 to 70 percent of his equity on a technology that has not yet proven that it can work and which takes 10 years to build,” he said.

Four Areva-designed EPR reactors of the same kind EDF wants to build in Britian are under construction in France, Finland and China and are years behind schedule and way over budget.

Piquemal declined to comment on technical issues, but said the EPR involves a “major construction risk”.

Since Piquemal’s resignation, EDF has announced a four billion euro capital increase and the government has agreed to forego cash dividends for two years, in a capital boost estimated at generating around 7 billion euros.”

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-edf-nuclear-britain-idUKKCN0XV0UX

“Planning and the Local Enterprise Partnership”


“There are a number of constitutional issues arising from the involvement of the LEP in development projects,. It appears that some of our constitutional rights could be eroded by the process. The LEP leadership and directors are leading council figures. Others are business leaders who by definition have large commercial interests to serve.

Planning decisions may be significantly influenced by unelected representatives in a non transparent manner. [Some of these unelected representatives are local council leaders]. Elected representatives will then feel pressurized to assist these through highway and other council departments.

Currently the involvement or assistance [or subsidy] of the LEP is not required to be stated on planning application. This appears to oppose our planning safeguards enshrined in planning laws. [In effect, the LEP is a co-developer].

Therefore we would ask that the following constitutional safeguards are put in place immediately and well before any “devolution” moves forward. A statement should also be issued by district councils clearly showing which planning applications were [are] supported by the LEP’s since their inception in 2011.

Clear information must be included in any planning application assisted by the LEP which shows what assistance and funding has been given by LEP and their partners on all planning application. This is simple openness and transparency that we all expect.”

Source: South Devon Watch [Facebook]

As an example, local LEPs smoothed the way for a re-opened Cornish tungsten mine but they did not have to declare this at the planning stage.

French government to sell assets to finance Hinkley C?

“The French government owns 86% of EDF, the company behind the nuclear power project, and has agreed to pay €3bn of a capital injection plan that was announced last month.

In October EDF struck a deal with China General Nuclear Power Corporation, which agreed to pay a third of the total cost of the project in return for a 33.5% stake.

Hinkley Point was supposed to start producing power by 2023, but French giant EDF, which is leading on the project, is reportedly struggling to raise the cash for its 66.5% stake.

According to the Financial Times, there are plans in place to sell airports in Nice and Lyon to help finance the deal.

Shares in Renault and Safran, the aerospace and defence group, could also be sold.

A spokesman for the French government did not comment yesterday.”

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/energy/nuclear-power/news/74501/french-government-considering-selling-shares-pay-hinkley

“EDF should invest in renewables, not Hinkley Point – French junior minister”

“EDF (EDF.PA) needs to change its strategy and invest in renewable energy rather than putting money into something as complicated as the Hinkley Point nuclear project, French Minister of State for State Reform Jean-Vincent Place said.

The comments on Thursday by the former head of the left-wing Greens contradict those of French Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron, who has argued that EDF must go ahead with the 18 billion pound project to build two nuclear plants in Britain.

“EDF needs to change its strategic vision,” Jean-Vincent Place said in an interview on Europe 1 radio.

“EDF should put its money into renewable energy, rather than into a project which has so many difficulties,” the junior minister added.

The government was to discuss EDF’s finances on Wednesday ahead of an EDF board meeting on Friday.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-edf-hinkleypoint-idUKKCN0XI0NG

Devolution: what’s in it for Devon?

The main driver of this devolution deal is Somerset. Hinkley C is the main focus of the deal and education, skills and supply chain projects dominate the LEP – hardly surprising given the nuclear, construction and educational bias of its board. The lead councillor and the lead officer are from Somerset County Council. The LEP’s telephone number is answered at a business unit in Yeovil.

So, rather than asking the (belated) question: what is in it for Devon with a (possible Somerset) Mayor, perhaps the question should be: what is in it for Devin?

Pity this poor LEP Board member

Barbara Shaw

Barbara has worked in housing for more than 15 years. In January 2012 she became Chief Executive of Westward Housing Group which manages 7,000 properties across the south west. Prior to this she worked for The Guinness Partnership and before that, Sovereign Housing. She began her career as a communications specialist and has held positions in the commercial, public and charitable sectors.”

Westward Housing Group’s website states:

Westward Housing Group is a major housing association in the south west. It encompasses Tarka Housing, Westcountry Housing, Help to Buy South West and Horizon Homes. As a developing landlord, we build new homes across the region, working in partnership with local authorities to rent homes to those in need.”

Most of the Group’s properties are in Devon, and include supported housing, housing for older people and shared ownership housing.

Given the government’s stated policy of supporting only home ownership and converting many rented properties (including those of housing associations) into private ownership, perhaps Ms Shaw should also be asking herself what’s in the devolution deal for her group.

Particularly as the Chair of the LEP, Steve Hindley, is Chairman of the Midas Group – a leading house builder for the private sector.

Leader of Norfolk Council now backtracking on devolution deal for East Anglia

…”So let’s not get too excited by the idea of devolution, Osborne-style. It’s not what we’ve campaigned for all these years. The Municipal Journal last week allowed Cllr George Nobbs, Leader of Norfolk County Council a page to share his frustration. Beneath a photo of the East Anglian flag and the headline ‘Killing off devolution’, he wrote:

“There is no more enthusiastic proponent of regional devolution than myself. I have supported the idea of moving powers from Whitehall to East Anglia all my adult life. When on Budget day the Chancellor announced a draft deal for East Anglia I nailed my colours to the mast in the most literal way, flying the flag of East Anglia from Norfolk County Hall. However, remarkably, the institutional arrogance of central government seems set to give us a deal that cannot be sold locally. As it stands not one of the three counties that make up the ‘Eastern Powerhouse’ look likely to be able to sell the current deal to members or residents…

The current ‘devolution deal’ was the result of a knee-jerk reaction to the Scottish referendum result and bears no resemblance to any other form of devolution in the UK, other than the insistence on the office of a London-style mayor for rural England…

The office of elected mayor is fine for London but universally opposed in shire county England. Senior government ministers have said time and time again that in the past devolution has failed because it was top-down. They had learned, they said. This would be bottom-up. We could design our own deal. We would be in the driving seat, they said. When we urged them to consider any alternative to an elected mayor (because we couldn’t sell it to our citizens) they said it was non-negotiable. ‘No mayor no deal’ was the answer. They were not even prepared to consider changing the one word mayor for another title.”

First it was Prescott, now it’s Osborne. You can have any colour of devolution you want as long as it’s black. So black you can’t see what’s going on. The mayoral model is non-negotiable because it’s part of a London-party consensus that values opaqueness above all. The democratic model, taking decisions openly, in full view of the press and public, and transparently, subject to the forensic examination of political debate in council chamber or legislative assembly, is judged not fit for purpose. End all the politics, we’re told. Actions, not words. But efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things, and without continual accountability it’s very easy both to do things wrong and to do the wrong things.

Next month, we’re told, we need to reject the unaccountable Brussels bureaucracy in favour of, well, what? How is accountability unfolding here? We need to put our own, British values first, apparently. Values like privatising our schools and our NHS, transforming them into profit centres far beyond any hope of democratic redress.

We’ve been told many times that the dissolution of English political unity would be too high a price to pay for the benefits regionalism brings, even if the regions reflect deep-rooted identities like Wessex and East Anglia. Yet the displacement of our historic shires by ‘Greater Lincolnshire’, ‘North Midlands’, ‘Tees Valley’ and other mayored innovations isn’t viewed as a problem. (Nor is it viewed as part of the ‘euro-plot’, as would any attempt to give England the regional governments now standard across all large west European countries.) As Ben Page, Chief Executive of Ipsos MORI, also writing in the Municipal Journal, noted, “The new rash of elected mayors for improbable geographies face some real challenges in getting noticed in any way at all.” That’s just it though. They’re not there to be noticed. A revolution in how England is governed is now underway as secret deals are lined up for sign-off. Personality mayors and commissioners for made-up areas will preside as local services are handed wholesale to global financial interests.

Do the public care? According to Ben Page’s data they do. Around half (49%) support the principle of decentralising local decision-making powers, with only 17% opposed. There are two main worries that are shared by 58% of those who don’t support devolution.

One is the spectre of ‘postcode lottery’ – the fear that services would start to vary between areas to an unacceptable degree (though it’s surprisingly acceptable for the Irish or the French to have different standards). Keeping the number of English regions well below double figures is one way to minimise this fear: the present hotch-potch of ‘improbable geographies’ is going to have to be sorted out sooner or later and the sooner the better. Another way is to make devolution real, so that regional politicians cannot blame Whitehall if they fail to match the standards of the best.

The second worry is that politicians in the provinces aren’t up to the job and so can’t be trusted with real power. That’s hardly surprising: real talent isn’t going to be attracted to run an ever-shrinking range of services subject to ever more intrusive interference from ministers and their civil servants anxious about poor performance. Breaking that vicious circle is easy. Tolerate responsibility through the ballot box, open up the opportunities and the talent will come. Or, to be more accurate, it will stay exactly where it is and not be lured to London.

… Meanwhile, the British State for which we’re supposed to boldly patrify shows how much it really cares about our identity, turning our ancient shires, the roots of our democracy, into clone-zones of the metropolis and topping each with its own little Caesar.

http://wessexregionalists.blogspot.co.uk/2016_05_01_archive.html

DCC leader doesn’t know if devolution will force a Mayor on us and, if so, what benefit it will bring – if any

John Hart, Leader DCC on Spotlight this evening saying he has written “six or seven letters” asking the Government if the Heart of the Southwest Local Enterprise Partnership devolution bid must include a Mayor for Devon and Somerset and, if so, “what extra benefits would it bring, if any?”

FOR GOD’S SAKE – SHOULDN’T HE (AND ALL THE OTHER COUNCILS AND THE LEP) HAVE SORTED THIS OUT BEFORE THEY PUT THEIR DEVOLUTION BID IN LAST MONTH!!!!!!

First East Devon Alliance conference

The Who Cares What You Think? conference at EDDC HQ , Knowle, last Saturday (23 April marked a turning point for the new political group of Independents, established in March 2015, just one year ago.

They have now joined forces with colleagues from across the South West.

Background

The East Devon Alliance of Independents (IEDA) have been hard at work since winning remarkable support in the May 2015 elections, which saw the number of Independent East Devon District Councillors increase five-fold, to 15.

Since then, two major IEDA reports have been accepted by Parliament:

House of Lords Select Committee on the economics of housing in the UK and

National Audit Office (Local Enterprise Partnerships)

The latter report, on LEPs, has just been sent to a higher level, the Parliamentary Accounts Committee (PAC), at the suggestion of the National Audit Office (NAO).

Making a difference

Meanwhile, the new IEDA Councillors have brought positive change:

– raising the level of debate
– producing well-researched reports so that decisions can be based on evidence rather than party allegiance
– introducing proper scrutiny.

Full report on the Who Cares What You Think? conference coming soon.

Hinkley C: the most expensive thing in the world

“Hinkley is set to be the most expensive object on Earth… best guesses say Hinkley could pass £24bn ($35bn),” said the environmental charity Greenpeace last month as it launched a petition against the project.

This figure includes an estimate for paying interest on borrowed money, but the financing arrangements for Hinkley C are so opaque that it is impossible to calculate exactly what the final cost will be.

Even if you stick with the expense of construction alone, though, the price is still high – the main contractor, EDF, puts it at £18bn ($26bn).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-36160368