Robert Jenrick wants beautiful new housing on leafy streets

Dream on! Owl imagines that, having gained outline permission under the proposed zoning system, developers will argue that they can’t afford tree-lined streets and access to green spaces. 

Remember that Cranbrook was a pioneering example of “developer led” development.

George Grylls, Political Reporter www.thetimes.co.uk

All new homes should be built in traditional architectural styles on tree-lined streets with access to green space, the government will announce today.

Robert Jenrick, the housing secretary, is set to outline a new national model design code, stipulating the types of façade and materials local authorities should demand of new buildings.

Councils will be asked to have local design codes that fit the history of their area. Traditional stonework will be encouraged in southern cities such as Bristol and Oxford, while developments in northern towns will be asked to reflect their red-brick heritage.

The Prince of Wales, who has advocated traditional architecture with his neo-Georgian developments at Poundbury, Dorset, and Nansledan, Cornwall, is a key inspiration for the reforms.

In a speech to the think tank Policy Exchange today Jenrick will also unveil the new national planning policy framework which will recommend that developments provide access to nature and include schemes to improve biodiversity. All new streets will be planted with trees as part of an effort to plant 7,000 hectares of woodland a year.

Writing in The Times Red Box today, Jenrick says people have become disillusioned with developers after decades of poor design and that new homes must be beautiful to win public approval.

“Urban planning since the war has at times been a disaster,” he writes. “It is little wonder people are sceptical of new housing. It is a logical response to unimaginative development and poor planning.

“Good design, ready access to nature, high environmental standards, should be for all, from Haringey to Hartlepool. This is about putting communities, not developers, in the driving seat to demand beauty, and insist on a return to a sense of stewardship — to building greener, popular homes and places that stand the test of time.”

Nansledan, near Newquay, is cited as a successful example of design. The 540-acre site will accommodate more than 4,000 pastel-coloured homes. The houses have traditional pitched roofs and are built using local materials.

To help deliver the plans, Jenrick has created a taskforce to drive up standards in the building industry, with developers, architects and planners all represented.

The Office for Place will be chaired by Nicholas Boys Smith, director of Create Streets, which lobbies for more terraced housing. Boys Smith collaborated with the late Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton on the government’s Building Better, Building Beautiful commission, which recommended that aesthetic considerations should be factored into planning decisions.

The announcements form the first part of the government’s planning reforms. A planning bill will come before the Commons this autumn amid unrest from Conservative backbenchers, many of whom blame the party’s humiliation at the Chesham & Amersham by-election last month on the unpopularity of the proposals.

Under the reforms, a zonal system will prevent homeowners from objecting to developments in their area.

Ministers believe that overhauling the planning system is crucial if the government is to hit its target of building 300,000 houses a year by the middle of the decade and enable younger generations to buy their own home.

In the past year, house prices have surged thanks to the temporary lifting of stamp duty taxes. The pressures of the pandemic have also led more people to seek out roomier properties with gardens. The average house price has risen to a record £338,000, according to Rightmove.

Deviations from outline planning permission – Burrington Estates “conditions”

Does outline planning permission give developers “Carte Blanche” to do whatever they like? If you think the situation is bad now, what’s it going to be like under the Government’s zoning proposals.

The latest on this particular legacy problem – Owl 

From a correspondent

You may remember that Burrington Estates achieved outline planning permission in December last year for development at Winslade Manor.  East Devon District Council overruled their own dedicated strategic policy (26B), the Local Plan, the Neighbourhood Plan and ignored the fact that part of the site was on a flood plain. The main reason that all the plans and policies were overruled and ignored was the economic benefits of employment that this scheme was promised by Burrington Estates to deliver.

Since December 2020 Burrington Estates have been in negotiations regarding the conditions on this site. Despite requesting updates nothing has been forthcoming as the negotiations have been confidential.

The Parish Council commented at last week’s Parish Council meeting that the detailed plans they had been shown contained a considerable number of differences from the outline permission. There has been no mention of the swimming pool or the community park facilities previously promised by Burringtons.  

Residents have been invited to attend a consultation event (details to be confirmed shortly.) In order to get some idea of numbers, to attend this event you need to register before 5pm Friday 23rd July. If you want to view the proposals you need to email comments@winsladepark-consultation.co.uk or  telephone 01392 581150, specifying your contact details. 

East Devon sees first Covid care home death for three months

Devon Live reports the latest ONS data confirms the first death of a care home resident from coronavirus in Devon for three months was in East Devon. Data relates to the week of July 3 to 9, but registered up to July 17.

From Freedom Day Owl understands that friends and relatives visiting care home residents will still need to wear protective equipment and be advised to minimise physical contact.

But there will not be a limit on the number of “named visitors” a resident can receive and no national limit on how many can visit in a single day.

Exmouth/Starcross Ferry service refuses to carry passengers without face masks

A ferry service between Exmouth and Starcross has split opinion after making face masks compulsory for passengers, including those medically exempt.

Alex Davis www.devonlive.com 

The ferry made the announcement yesterday (July 18) on its Facebook page, stating that the ferry would be too small to accommodate those without masks

The post read: “All customers please take note from Monday 19th we are sticking to the face coverings rules which we have been running.”

“We did ask our passengers on Facebook what they would prefer and it come back keep the face coverings. With the social distancing rules change there will be lots of people sitting next to each other. So for everyone’s safety face masks or face covers must be worn by all passengers 6 years and over.”

“We are very sorry for people who can’t wear face masks. This is for everyone’s safety both crew and passengers.”

As of July 19, most legal restrictions have come to an end, including social distancing and social contact restrictions. Despite this, many businesses are still urging customers to wear face coverings in crowded, enclosed spaces.

Some commenters responded to the post, saying the company had made the right decision.

One commenter said: “Great idea, fully support. If people don’t like the cloth face coverings, they can always use the plastic visor type. Have you ever thought of standing for PM? Asking for a friend…..”

Another said: “Totally support your right to do this. Haven’t been on the ferry for a year but looking forward to joining you soon.”

While many commenters approved of the decision, many comments questioned why medically-exempt passengers wouldn’t be allowed to board without a covering.

One commenter asked: “So you will be discriminating against disabled people?”

Another said: “Appalling isn’t it. Discrimination against the disabled or those with underlying health issues.”

Starcross-Exmouth Ferry responded to these comments, saying: “We have been very busy and we haven’t got the space to put people without a mask.”

They added: “We are a private company trying to keep people safe. Just because your exempt what gives you the rights to do what you like. We do carry lots of exempt people who don’t mind sitting down for 15 minutes or so with a face covering.”

“We can’t take people in wheelchairs because they can’t get to us in the first place. There is a footbridge over the railway and steps at the end of the pier we land on.”

Scientist casts doubt on validity of Boris Johnson’s ‘workplace pilot’

A scientist has cast doubt on the validity of a workplace pilot scheme used by Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak to initially avoid self-isolation, accusing the government of secrecy surrounding it and other research.

Ben Quinn www.theguardian.com 

On Monday, 24 hours on from a hasty U-turn by the prime minister and chancellor, Downing Street faced fresh questions about the workplace study and was still unable to provide basic details such as its criteria, protocols and name.

The basic scientific validity of the study was questioned by Prof Jon Deeks, who is co-chair of a Royal Statistical Society working group reviewing evidence on Covid-19 testing, after it emerged that it has no control group.

A better-known, separate Department of Health and Social Care study involved some participants self-isolating and others being allowed to take daily tests instead after being selected at random.

Deeks, a professor of biostatistics at the University of Birmingham, speaking in a personal capacity said: “Without a control group what is this [workplace] study going to tell us? The question is also: what is the status of this alleged secret study which none of us knew about? It should have a name, a protocol, and approval from Public Health England’s ethics committee.

“Part of the problem is that the Department of Health have been quite secretive about their studies. They are just not transparent.”

Deeks said the workplace scheme was part of a pattern of government pilot events, which have included Euro 2020 and Wimbledon. “The government has also been doing a thing where they set up what they describe as a ‘pilot’ if they want something to happen,” he said.

“This was the case back in January as well in relation to schools. Rather than waiting for a proper scientific study to be done they call something a ‘pilot’ and because they are in charge of everything they appear to get away with it.”

Such an approach could be taken because the health secretary is in charge of testing, evaluation studies and the manufacture of test kits and also oversees the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Deeks said.

The government was also grilled on Monday when the prime minister travelled to Chequers after being told he was a close contact of a Covid-positive case, the health secretary, Sajid Javid.

Johnson’s spokesperson gave different answers on the issue of when Johnson travelled from Downing Street to Chequers, first telling reporters it was at the “start of the weekend”, then Friday morning, then 3pm on Friday.

Separately, a letter released by the MHRA under the Freedom of Information Act made clear that lateral flow test kits of the type which Johnson would have used daily under the pilot scheme were not authorised for daily use unless part of an approved study.

The DHSC said 20 organisations were covered by the workplace pilot.

A union representing Border Force officers has criticised the scheme, which was set up in Manchester and Dover. The PCS spokesperson said: “The trial was extremely unpopular with our members who were put in unnecessary harm’s way by having to use public transport on their days off to come in to get tested. It was completely unworkable and staff preferred to self-isolate which is what the PM and chancellor should have done when they were pinged on the test-and-trace app.”

‘Rottenness at heart of Tories flows from PM who thinks rules are for others’

The Committee on Standards in Public Life was set up in the wake of Tory sleaze scandals under John Major.

It exists to make sure that ministers stick to the principles of integrity, honesty, transparency and selflessness.

Boris Johnson clearly doesn’t give a fig for such concepts.

Voice of the Mirror www.mirror.co.uk

If he did he would not have appointed former Bullingdon Club colleague Ewen Fergusson to the committee.

How can an organisation charged with policing cronyism operate successfully when it has a crony among its members?

The PM is making a mockery of accountability. His former ethics adviser quit after he failed to sack Priti Patel for bullying.

He has also refused to act over Covid contracts going to Tory donors and supporters.

There is a rottenness at the heart of this Government and it flows from a leader who believes that rules are for other people.

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 5 July

Boris Johnson refused autumn lockdown because Covid victims ‘essentially all over 80’, leaked messages suggest

Boris Johnson refused to take the country into lockdown in the autumn because “the people dying are essentially all over 80”, leaked phone messages appear to show.

Interview on BBC 2 at 1900 tonight – Owl

http://www.independent.co.uk 

The WhatsApp chats, passed to the BBC by former No 10 chief of staff Dominic Cummings, also show the prime minister saying he did not “buy all this NHS overwhelmed stuff” months before deaths soared to over 1,000 a day.

And in his first interview since leaving No 10, Mr Cummings claimed the PM had to be stopped from going to see the Queen at the start of the pandemic.

Mr Johnson had already been told to avoid contact with the elderly after staff at No 10 had been taken ill.

Downing Street has not questioned the veracity of the leaked messages or denied the claims about the handling of the pandemic – though Mr Johnson’s office says the incident involving the Queen did not take place.

“He [Boris Johnson] said we should never have done the first lockdown, he said that repeatedly in meetings in No 10,” Mr Cummings, who quit in acrimony last year, told the BBC.

“After the first wave passed and after he came back to work, initially his view was essentially, thank goodness we did do that, but very quickly, as the Telegraph and various parts of the media and Tory Party started screaming, he then basically reverted and said, actually the whole thing was a disaster, we should never have done it, I was right in February, we should basically just ignore it and just let the thing wash through the country and not destroy the economy and move on.”

Mr Cummings claimed that Mr Johnson referred to TheTelegraph newspaper, which backed his leadership campaign and previously payed him £250,000 a year on top of his politicians’ salary to write a column, as “my real boss”.

Though public and scientific support for strong anti-Covid measures has remained high throughout the pandemic, a section of the Conservative-supporting press and some Tory MPs have pushed back against restrictions at every opportunity.

The former aide said the prime minister rejected the advice of chief scientific advisor and medical officer Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty when they told him to lock down hard and early.

Messages apparently dating from 15 October – two weeks before the prime minister ordered another lockdown – appear to show Mr Johnson unperturbed by the mounting death toll.

“I must say I have been slightly rocked by some of the data on Covid fatalities,” the messages appear to show the prime minister saying.

“The median age is 82 – 81 for men 85 for women. That is above life expectancy. So get Covid and live longer.

“Hardly anyone under 60 goes into hospital (4 per cent) and of those virtually all survive. And I no longer buy all this NHS overwhelmed stuff. Folks I think we may need to recalibrate.”

Mr Cummings told the broadcaster: “His [Boris Johnson’s] attitude at that point [autumn 2020] was a weird mix of, er, partly it’s all nonsense and lockdowns don’t work anyway and partly well this is terrible but the people who are dying are essentially all over 80 and we can’t kill the economy just because of people dying over 80.”

“Lots of people heard the prime minister say that; the prime minister texted that to me and other people.”

“He put his own political interests ahead of people’s lives for sure.”

It has previously been reported that Mr Johnson said he would rather the “bodies pile high in their thousands” than order another lockdown – a claim that has not been denied by No 10.

Recounting Mr Johnson’s alleged attempt to visit the Queen when he may have been exposed to Covid-19, Mr Cummings said: “I said, what are you doing, and he said, I’m going to see the Queen and I said, what on earth are you talking about, of course you can’t go and see the Queen. He said, ah, that’s what I do every Wednesday, sod this, I’m gonna go and see her.”

“I said to him [Boris Johnson], there’s people in this office who are isolating, you might have coronavirus, I might have coronavirus, you can’t go and see the Queen. What if you go and see her and give the Queen coronavirus?

“You obviously can’t go … I just said if you, if you give her coronavirus and she dies, what are you gonna do? You can’t do that, you can’t risk that, that’s completely insane. And he said, he basically just hadn’t thought it through, he said, yeah, ‘holy s***, I can’t go.’”

A Downing Street spokesperson said: “Since the start of the pandemic, the prime minister has taken the necessary action to protect lives and livelihoods, guided by the best scientific advice,” the spokesperson said.

“The government he leads has delivered the fastest vaccination rollout in Europe, saved millions of jobs through the furlough scheme and prevented the NHS from being overwhelmed through three national lockdowns.

“The government is entirely focused on emerging cautiously from the pandemic and building back better.”

Confusion over when Boris Johnson left No 10 for Chequers as spokesperson changes story

Downing Street in muddle over prime minister’s movements – as Labour demands to know if he knew Sajid Javid was feeling ill

www.independent.co.uk

Keir Starmer says Tory ministers ‘played the system’ to avoid self-isolation

No 10 changed its story about when Boris Johnson left for his Chequers country home, as Labour demanded to know if Sajid Javid already had Covid “symptoms”, following the pair’s meeting.

The prime minister’s spokesperson first said the departure was at “the start of the weekend”, then said it was on Friday morning – before correcting himself by stating it was at 3pm on Friday.

He did not answer directly whether Mr Johnson knew if his health secretary was feeling ill when he left London for Chequers – after a Friday meeting between the pair.

“The correct process has been followed,” the spokesperson said, stating Mr Johnson was at the country home when he was identified as a close contact of Mr Javid, by the test and trace system.

“Once contacted by NHS Test and Trace over the weekend, he has isolated and has not travelled subsequently because he did not want to travel across the country,” he added.

Mr Johnson led a press conference by video link – from Chequers – while Patrick Vallance, the chief scientific adviser, and deputy medical officer Jonathan Van-Tam spoke from Downing Street.

Sir Keir Starmer said there were questions to be answered, asking: “Did Boris Johnson travel to his country retreat after Sajid Javid first had symptoms?

“We know the prime minister likes to look for a loophole. We need to know when the prime minister was contacted and where he was.”

In a contradictory briefing, the spokesperson was unable to say when Mr Johnson learnt of Mr Javid’s positive test – or when he was identified as a close contact by test and trace.

At one point he stated he left for Chequers on Friday morning – before it was pointed out that there were photos of the health secretary leaving the pair’s meeting early on Friday afternoon.

After stating the departure was at 3pm, the spokesperson said: “The health secretary took his test on Saturday, so the correct process has been followed.”

He would not say whether Carrie Johnson, the prime minister’s wife was with him, but did state that the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, is quarantining in his flat above No 10.

Downing Street issued a statement at 8am on Sunday stating that both Mr Johnson and Mr Sunak would swerve isolation rules by taking part in a “daily contact testing workplace pilot”

But it was forced into a rapid U-turn amid public anger over the impression that they were dodging strict rules imposed on everyone else contacted by test and trace.

The isolation means a crucial meeting with Irish premier Micheal Martin – to discuss the crisis over the Northern Ireland Protocol and the proposed amnesty for Troubles’ killings – was scrapped.

Covid rips through Devon community

“Infection rates across Devon are the highest they have ever been – currently at 319.3/100,000 – and are set to rise further in upcoming days as more data gets added.”

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com

Braunton in North Devon saw more than one per cent of its residents test positive for coronavirus last week.

Latest figures for the county’s MSOA areas for the seven day period between July 8-14 show every single area is recording a cluster of three or more cases.

Four of the top five areas where the highest number of cases were confirmed were in Torbay, with Chelston, Cockington & Livermead, Paignton Central, Torquay Central, and Blatchcombe & Blagdon all seeing more than 60 cases confirmed.

But Braunton saw 96 cases in that seven day period – and with an infection rate of 1,017.4/100,000, it means that more than one per cent of the population tested positive.

Infection rates across Devon are the highest they have ever been – currently at 319.3/100,000 – and are set to rise further in upcoming days as more data gets added.

Steve Brown, Devon’s director of public health, said that while restrictions may have changed, “our responsibility as members of our family, friends and society have not changed”, and urged residents to think carefully about their actions.

He added: “We need to take personal responsibility, remain cautious, and continue with the efforts we have made so far in helping to stop the spread.

Promoted Stories

“Employers also, the rules have changed, but please continue to do the right thing by your workforce and your customers.

“The goalposts may have moved with the intended lifting of restrictions, but our responsibility as members of our family, friends and society have not changed. Please choose to do the right thing for ourselves and others.”

FULL LIST OF MSOA CLUSTERS FOR DEVON

AreaMSOAInfection RateCases
North DevonBraunton1017.496
TorbayChelston, Cockington & Livermead822.390
TorbayPaignton Central733.470
TorbayTorquay Central82863
TorbayBlatchcombe & Blagdon506.161
Mid DevonBradninch, Silverton & Thorverton717.560
East DevonCranbrook, Broadclyst & Stoke Canon423.457
Mid DevonCullompton636.756
East DevonExmouth Town73154
TorbayEllacombe925.854
East DevonExmouth Withycombe Raleigh687.951
TorbayShiphay & the Willows482.551
TeignbridgeKingsteignton538.948
TorbayBrixham Town507.548
East DevonExmouth Halsdon663.246
ExeterPennsylvania & University386.945
ExeterPinhoe & Whipton North469.744
TorbayWatcombe609.144
TorbayBabbacombe & Plainmoor729.541
ExeterMiddlemoor & Sowton318.740
Mid DevonTiverton North & Outer448.939
North DevonIlfracombe East724.539
TeignbridgeNewton Abbot, Broadlands & Wolborough676.139
TorbaySt Marychurch & Maidencombe640.137
TorbayWellswood471.737
TeignbridgeNewton Abbot, Town Centre575.536
TorbayUpton & Hele561.436
East DevonOttery St Mary & West Hill392.935
TeignbridgeChudleigh & Bovey Tracey358.835
North DevonIlfracombe West57634
South HamsWoolwell & Lee Mill554.234
TeignbridgeTeignmouth South499.434
TeignbridgeNewton Abbot, Highweek552.834
East DevonExmouth Littleham425.932
Mid DevonTiverton East430.232
TorbayPreston & Shorton362.732
TeignbridgeOgwell, Mile End & Teigngrace369.631
East DevonExmouth Brixington463.230
ExeterExwick & Foxhayes383.329
ExeterCountess Wear & Topsham375.929
South HamsWembury, Brixton & Newton Ferrers428.129
ExeterSt James’s Park & Hoopern292.128
North DevonWoolacombe, Georgeham & Croyde519.428
North DevonBarnstaple South314.928
South HamsIvybridge238.228
TorridgeBideford South & East218.528
East DevonFeniton & Whimple308.227
ExeterMincinglake & Beacon Heath384.727
South HamsYealmpton, Modbury & Aveton Gifford350.427
South HamsTotnes Town29426
South HamsMarldon, Stoke Gabriel & Kingswear34726
ExeterHeavitree West & Polsloe292.825
ExeterSt Thomas West343.625
Mid DevonTiverton West396.325
North DevonSouth Molton250.725
East DevonSeaton318.524
ExeterSt Thomas East293.324
West DevonTavistock191.324
ExeterCentral Exeter190.323
Mid DevonUffculme & Hemyock336.323
TeignbridgeTeignmouth North271.623
TorbayClifton & Maidenway323.523
ExeterHeavitree East & Whipton South291.722
ExeterWonford & St Loye’s265.522
Mid DevonCrediton277.622
North DevonBratton Fleming, Goodleigh & Kings Heanton357.722
TeignbridgeKingskerswell35822
TorbayChurston & Galmpton325.122
East DevonHoniton North & East347.221
East DevonAxminster225.321
North DevonRoundswell & Landkey227.121
TeignbridgeDawlish North247.121
TeignbridgeDawlish South31321
TeignbridgeHeathfield & Liverton325.521
North DevonLynton & Combe Martin364.820
North DevonBarnstaple Central315.320
South HamsLoddiswell & Dartington276.820
TorbayGoodrington & Roselands279.820
TorridgeHolsworthy, Bradworthy & Welcombe197.420
East DevonPoppleford, Otterton & Woodbury308.819
South HamsKingsbridge292.519
South HamsChillington, Torcross & Stoke Fleming335.519
East DevonKilmington, Colyton & Uplyme215.618
ExeterSt Leonard’s267.918
ExeterAlphington & Marsh Barton245.218
TeignbridgeNewton Abbot, Milber & Buckland321.318
East DevonClyst, Exton & Lympstone248.717
North DevonBarnstaple Pilton291.617
South HamsSalcombe, Malborough & Thurlestone329.117
East DevonSidmouth Sidford227.616
Mid DevonMorchard Bishop, Copplestone & Newton St Cyres215.616
South HamsDartmouth294.816
TeignbridgeBishopsteignton & Shaldon238.916
TorbayHigher Brixham212.716
West DevonBere Alston, Buckland Monachorum & Yelverton252.616
North DevonBarnstaple Sticklepath254.515
North DevonFremington & Instow234.515
TeignbridgeStarcross & Exminster173.615
TeignbridgeAshburton & Buckfastleigh186.715
TorridgeBideford North251.715
Mid DevonWilland, Sampford Peverell & Halberton191.314
East DevonBudleigh Salterton209.113
TeignbridgeTedburn, Shillingford & Higher Ashton241.513
TeignbridgeIpplepen & Broadhempston231.513
TorridgeGreat Torrington217.413
TorridgeShebbear, Cookworthy & Broadheath183.613
West DevonChagford, Princetown & Dartmoor187.213
West DevonHorrabridge & Mary Tavy197.812
Mid DevonBampton, Holcombe & Westleigh160.711
South HamsSouth Brent & Cornwood132.311
TorridgeWestward Ho! & Northam South172.411
West DevonHatherleigh, Exbourne & North Tawton103.710
West DevonLifton, Lamerton & Bridestowe150.410
East DevonHoniton South & West163.69
TorridgeWinkleigh & High Bickington123.19
North DevonBishop’s Nympton, Witheridge & Chulmleigh117.28
TorridgeAppledore & Northam North131.28
East DevonSidbury, Offwell & Beer129.77
East DevonSidmouth Town133.67
TeignbridgeMoretonhampstead, Lustleigh & East Dartmoor1197
TorridgeHartland Coast76.85
West DevonOkehampton65.75
East DevonDunkesewell, Upottery & Stockland68.94
Mid DevonBow, Lapford & Yeoford47.13

Breaking news: the system is broken – you couldn’t make it up!

UK runs out of Covid lateral flow tests on Freedom Day as millions order kits

Kelly-Ann Mills www.mirror.co.uk

Coronavirus lateral flow tests given out by the Government for free have run out as millions order kits on Freedom Day.

The government’s website tells people to “come back tomorrow”.

Sidmouth continues to crumble away!

Another Devon beach cliff fall is captured on camera

Anita Merritt www.devonlive.com

Another cliff fall at a Devon beach has been captured on camera just weeks after four other separate incidents were reported in the same town.

Yesterday (July 17) some more of the notorious crumbling cliffs tumbled down causing huge plumes of red dust and a “deafening” noise.

The aftermath of the cliff fall at Sidmouth was captured by Brad Palmer during a visit to the seaside town.

Read more: Prince Charles expected to ditch face mask when he visits Exeter tomorrow

He recalled: “I was walking in that direction and saw the whole thing. A large side of of the cliff face just dropped.

“The sound was deafening. People behind us and in front all looked over to see what it was.

The aftermath of the Sidmouth beach cliff fall

The aftermath of the Sidmouth beach cliff fall (Image: Brad Palmer)

“The aftermath was just a huge dust cloud which lasted about five minutes leaving a mound of mud and clay on the beach, which is accompanied by a previous rock fall in the background.”

Last month, Devon Live reported how a cliff fall had been witnessed for the fourth time over the past three weeks. It occurred on June 10, just two days after the most recent landslide in Sidmouth, which prompted a warning from Beer Coastguard team.

In May of last year there were three cliff falls which all took place within 24 hours in Sidmouth.

Were we turning a corner when Boris hit the gas?

Tim Spector’s studies have correctly spotted the turning points in the evolution of the pandemic in the UK so far. So is this another one or is it something to do with the sample?

New cases plateau ahead of Freedom Day

covid.joinzoe.com 

According to ZOE COVID Study incidence figures, it is estimated that among unvaccinated people in the UK there are currently 17,581 new daily symptomatic cases of COVID on average, based on PCR test data from up to five days ago [*]. A decrease of 22% from 22,638 last week. Suggesting that the wave in the unvaccinated population has now peaked in the UK. The overall number of estimated cases is 33,118 which remains similar to last weeks which was 33,723.

Comparatively there are currently 15,537 new daily symptomatic cases in partly or fully vaccinated people, an increase of 40% from 11,084 new cases last week. With cases in the vaccinated group continuing to rise, the number of new cases in the vaccinated population is set to overtake the unvaccinated in the coming days. 

In terms of prevalence, on average 1 in 142 people in the UK currently have symptomatic COVID (Table 1). 

The UK R value is 1.0 and regional R values are; England, 1.0, Wales, 1.1, Scotland, 0.9 (Table 1). Across the regions, it’s a mixed picture. New cases in the North East and East of England are still rising but in Scotland cases are now falling. In Wales cases remain relatively low and are rising very slowly. The rest of the UK reflects the overall picture, which is one where cases have stopped in their tracks for now.

According to the ZOE COVID Study there are an estimated 550 cases of Long COVID a day among unvaccinated people in the UK. This is calculated by using the estimated number of daily new cases from ZOE and the rates of long COVID from the latest research on risk factors for long COVID [ref] and adjusting for age differences. This figure is smoothed, see Graph 2. 

The ZOE COVID Study incidence figures (new symptomatic cases) are based on reports from around one million weekly contributors and the proportion of newly symptomatic users who have received positive swab tests. The latest survey figures were based on data from 10,303 recent swab tests done between 26 June and 11 July 2021. The data excludes lateral flow tests.

Tim Spector OBE, lead scientist on the ZOE COVID Study app and Professor of Genetic Epidemiology at King’s College London, comments on the latest data:

“We are seeing the overall incidence rates plateau in the UK with an R value of 1.0, which is good news. But the rate of decline may be slower this time, as many of the restrictions in place previously will end. The numbers are still high with around 1 in 142 people with COVID, so we’ll keep a close eye on numbers and the effect of the Euro Football Championship in the coming days and weeks. Interestingly, comparing the UK globally, we are starting to see cases in the rest of the world catching up. This is probably due to the Delta variant taking hold, and the relative success of the vaccine roll out in the UK as well as vaccination rates slow in other countries. In the UK, new cases in vaccinated people are still going up and will soon outpace unvaccinated cases. This is probably because we’re running out of unvaccinated susceptible people to infect as more and more people get the vaccine. Whilst the figures look worrying, it’s important to highlight that vaccines have massively reduced severe infections and post-vaccination COVID is a much milder disease for most people. The main concern is now the risk of Long COVID.”

Graph 1. The ZOE COVID Study UK Infection Survey results over time 

Graph 2. Long COVID incidence in the UK

Table 1. Incidence (daily new symptomatic cases)[*], R values and prevalence regional breakdown table 

Map of UK prevalence figures

U.K. Counts More New Covid Cases Than Any Other Country, One Day Before Dropping Pandemic Restrictions

The world watches “the great experiment” – Owl

Carlie Porterfield www.forbes.com 

Topline

The United Kingdom reported a whopping 48,161 new coronavirus cases Sunday, more than any other country in the world, just one day before most of the country is set to pull all of its pandemic restrictions despite rising infections.

Key Facts

The figure represents a more than 43% surge in new cases compared to a week ago as the U.K. is facing another wave which experts attribute to the spread of the delta variant, which is believed to be more transmissible than earlier forms of the virus.

The new infections have occurred largely among young, unvaccinated Brits, who were among the last in line to be eligible to receive a vaccine from the U.K.’s National Health Service, which is now offering jabs for anyone 18 and older.

England, which makes up more than 84% of the U.K. population, is slated to drop all pandemic restrictions Monday, including masking rules and capacity guidelines.

The other three countries that make up the U.K.—Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales—will also loosen their existing restrictions, but not to the extent that England is.

Public Health England data show coronavirus deaths and hospitalizations remain far lower than during previous pandemic peaks, which experts attribute to vaccinations preventing serious illness, though the numbers have risen over the past week.

Surprising Fact

Even the new health secretary, Sajid Javid, tested positive for coronavirus over the weekend, sending some of the nation’s top officials—including Prime Minister Boris Johnson—into isolation.

Contra

The decision to open up the U.K. amid the spike in cases has drawn backlash from public health officials and members of the medical community. Earlier this month, after the U.K. government announced plans to loosen restrictions, 122 scientists and doctors signed an open letter calling the move “dangerous and premature” and urged the government to reconsider.

Key Background

According to a Johns Hopkins University tally, the U.K. has counted more than 5.4 million confirmed infections and nearly 129,000 deaths, making it the worst-hit country in Europe by coronavirus. Despite having a more effective vaccination campaign than most European countries, new infections began to gradually rise again in June, though hospitalizations and deaths tied to coronavirus have stayed low. 

Why ‘freedom day’ is the latest example of COVID propaganda

The lifting of most COVID legal restrictions on July 19 has been dubbed “freedom day” by some politicians and journalists. Though not an official designation, this popularisation of this moment with such a saying closely follows two of my 10 “golden rules” of propaganda that I’ve developed in my years studying the practice. First, appeal to the instincts rather than the reason of the audience, and second, build around a slogan. Then repeat, repeat, repeat.

Colin Alexander theconversation.com

To this end, the media’s regular use of the phrase reflects its compliance with – and encouragement of – the government’s pandemic communications strategy. It is one of these phrases that you cannot quite place where it first emerged but which quickly seeps into public discussion to the point that we all know what it means.

Throughout the pandemic, the British government has utilised a wartime propaganda playbook to deliver public communications about COVID and the purported solutions to it. In these terms, we are now heading for the end of the “combat” phase of the government’s propaganda delivery and the beginning of the post-pandemic – or post-war – phase.

In this sense, “freedom day” could be compared to VE Day (Victory in Europe Day, May 8 1945) and ought to be regarded as the latest in a long line of rhetorical associations with the second world war that have been encouraged over the last 16 months.

References to blitz spirit, the militarisation of language around and heroisation of the NHS and the attention on second world war veteran Tom Moore as the flagship of British determination and sacrifice are just a few of the ways this history has manifested in COVID Britain.

Concepts like “freedom” and “liberty” have been invoked by propagandists since the 16th-century Protestant Reformation and subsequent Enlightenment period. They emerged as influential writers – Thomas Paine, John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin, to name a few – began to philosophise about the rights of the individual.

To this end, the popular use of “freedom” to describe the end of pandemic restrictions forms part of a populist audience seduction strategy, using emotional rather than rational rhetoric. The media’s purpose in using the phrase then is to be appear to be on the side of the public. As Harold Lasswell, one of the founding fathers of communications studies, wrote in 1927: the best propaganda is that which is the “champion of our dreams”.

The philosopher Patrick Nowell-Smith discussed the seductiveness of the propaganda of “freedom” in his 1954 work Ethics, noting its association with hedonism and its “deliciousness” within the human mind. He caveats that hedonism is not always about “gluttony and self-centredness” and is not always “carnal”.

From the propagandist’s point of view though, “freedom” is an effective rhetorical tool because it means whatever the target audience want it to mean. Its utility is that the term is vague but that it resonates with ease when uttered.

Understanding propaganda

One of the most common misconceptions around propaganda is that it always involves the communication of falsehoods to a mass audience and attempts to “brainwash” – evoking shades of North Korea or the Nazis. In the common mind, propaganda is synonymous with the use of dark arts to encourage a target audience to engage in behaviours or to think in ways that they would otherwise not. Undoubtedly, some propaganda does do this.

Propaganda is more complex than this and can also involve truth-telling, however selective or self-interested.

Today, propaganda is all around us. It is undertaken by governments, state institutions, corporations trying to sell us things, media organisations, charities and powerful individuals in advance of their own interests – just look at any billionaire philanthropist “doing good” while paying next to zero tax.

Individual citizens have obtained the means to broadcast for ourselves, particularly via social media platforms, and we too have become propagandists. “Influencer” is just a more acceptable way of saying “propagandist.”

“Freedom day” is not a lie, because restrictions will be lifted. However, the popularisation of it as such (rather than “most restrictions lifted day,” for example), is part of a strategy (endorsed by government and mainstream media alike) that has wanted the British public to think, act, associate and feel in certain ways since the pandemic began.

Indeed, the best, or most effective, propaganda is that which creates emotional bonds between the target audience and certain people, products, events or concepts. “Freedom day” has been so-called because the powerful want us to think in certain ways about this day, and to exclude or overlook other aspects of the pandemic that it deems undesirable.

To overwhelm the public’s conscience (or to subtly railroad it while making it seem like choices are available) is one of the highest art forms in propaganda. We see this perhaps most clearly within public discussion of the vaccine programme wherein government and media have sought to marginalise more critical views of it.

Calling it “freedom day” attempts to nullify the public by encouraging us not to scrutinise government and media performance as we should. It reflects an attempt to move the discussion from science, sociology and public health to patriotism and emancipation.

Labour accuses Gove of lying about extent of vetting for PPE deals

Michael Gove has been accused of falsely claiming all personal protective equipment (PPE) contracts for the NHS went through eight steps of vetting, as it emerged this did not happen with a deal for millions of unusable face masks linked to a Conservative adviser.

Rowena Mason http://www.theguardian.com 

Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, said Gove and other ministers were “apparently lying to the public and lying to parliament” by claiming that “every single procurement decision went through an eight-stage process”.

She uncovered the fact that the much-vaunted eight-step process was not undertaken in the case of Ayanda Capital, which was awarded £252m of deals for PPE supplies in spring 2020. Face masks provided by Ayanda were ultimately unusable because the Department of Health and Social Care had specified masks with ear loops, despite the NHS requiring masks that looped over the head.

The process was also not followed in the case of PestFix, a pest control supplies company with net assets of £18,000 that was awarded a contract to supply PPE worth £350m to the NHS, some of which also did not meet the health service’s technical standards.

In answer to a parliamentary question, the health minister, Jo Churchill, said: “The eight-stage process to assess and approve offers of support to supply [PPE] evolved over a short period of time at the end of April 2020 to formalise the checks quickly put in place by the cross-government PPE procurement cell in March 2020.

“Contracts with Ayanda Capital and PestFix pre-dated the formalised eight-stage assurance process but these suppliers were evaluated by officials on financial standing, technical compliance and ability to perform the contract. The contracts are awarded by the appropriate departmental accounting officer in line with our terms and conditions.”

Internal documents released as part of a judicial review case revealed in May that Ayanda, a “family office” finance house in London, was awarded two PPE contracts for a total of £252m after being referred to the VIP lane for assessing deals because its representative, Andrew Mills, was an adviser to Liz Truss, the trade secretary.

Officials pushed for the contracts to be processed as quickly as possible, with one marking emails “URGENT VIP CASE” and “VERY URGENT VIP ESCALATION”, saying that if the deal did not happen: “Andrew will escalate as high as he can possibly go!”

The two contracts were approved on 30 April 2020, five days after Ayanda was put into the VIP lane, but before required financial checks had been carried out on the company, despite a Cabinet Office official raising “major issues or concerns” because of inadequate availability of public financial information and a “low” credit score.

Ayanda has consistently said it fulfilled the contract according to the specifications it was given.

Rayner, who is the shadow chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, Gove’s opposite number, said:

“Why have Michael Gove and government ministers apparently been lying to the public and lying to parliament to try to cover this up? Michael Gove needs to explain why he has not been telling the truth.

“We need a fully independent investigation into the Tories’ VIP fast track for PPE and testing contracts to get to the bottom of who got the contracts, how they got them and what connections they have to Conservative ministers and the Conservative party.”

Jo Maugham QC, director of Good Law Project, which brought the legal challenge to the Pestfix and Ayanda contracts, said: “You begin to wonder if there are any statements from ministers that you can rely on. It looks like they’ve been infected by Johnsonism: total lack of interest in the truth.”

A government spokesperson said: “All PPE contracts went through a robust process of checks and controls led by officials. These contracts have delivered over 9bn items of PPE to protect frontline workers.”

The government is defending the judicial review over the PPE contracts, arguing the VIP route and the contracts awarded, including to PestFix, Ayanda and another company, were lawful and reasonable as the government tried to rapidly meet a serious shortfall of PPE at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic.

A National Audit Office report in November said 144 referrals to the VIP lane had come from ministers’ private offices, but said of its investigation: “Ministers had properly declared their interests, and we found no evidence of their involvement in procurement decisions or contract management.”

East Devon receives £100k for climate change projects

East Devon District Council has been given £100,000 to help it tackle climate change. The money, from Defra and the Environment Agency is to be topped up with £10,000 from the council’s own budget for projects at Clyst Valley Regional Park.

Radio Exe News www.radioexe.co.uk 

The council is setting up what they call an environmental impact bond and triple the number of trees in the park through planting and natural regeneration.

Projects to restore kelp forests, create new woodland, deliver natural flood risk management, and improve water quality are among 27 schemes nationally, including the East Devon one, to benefit from the new fund to drive private investment in nature and tackle climate change,

Revenues will be generated through the sale of carbon and biodiversity units, natural flood management benefits and through reduced water treatment costs. In developing these revenue streams, the Fund will help create a pipeline of projects for the private sector to invest in, and develop new funding models that can be scaled and replicated elsewhere.

Projects receiving funding focus on tackling climate change and restoring nature through schemes such as woodland and habitat creation, peatland restoration, sustainable drainage and river catchment management.

Cllr Geoff Jung, East Devon District Council’s portfolio holder for coast, country and environment, said: “The EDDC Climate Change Strategy 2020–2025 sets out how we will reduce our carbon emissions year on year and mitigate against the threat that climate will place on our communities. The strategy is being developed following research by Exeter University to establish our current carbon footprint. Our strategy will encompass all our 10 nature reserves and open spaces by increasing natural habitat and increase tree planting to sequester carbon and allow nature to recover, and this funding will help in our exciting plans for the Clyst Valley Regional Park. 

Simon Bates, East Devon District Council’s green infrastructure project manager said: “We want to explore whether an environmental impact bond is the solution. This would blend cash from publicly funded grant schemes and private finance from woodland carbon and biodiversity credits. With major companies such as EON, EDF and many smaller environmental start-up businesses on our doorstep, we expect high demand for voluntary carbon credits in particular.”

Freedom day dawns with Boris confined to the garret

It took 2 hours 38 minutes for Boris to realise that his latest “one rule for you, another one for us” little wizz of enrolling himself on “a pilot testing scheme” to avoid self isolating wouldn’t wash with the public or business.

Says a lot about Conservative arrogance these days that the thought came into his head at all (and Rishi Sunak’s head) and that Robert “three homes” jenrick was prepared to defend it on TV.

Maybe the arrogance runs deeper and Ministers have already dropped their guard and assumed that Covid would only infect the”little people”.

U-turn as Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak to self-isolate after criticism

Ben Quinn www.theguardian.com

Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak have been forced into a U-turn and will self-isolate after coming into contact with the health secretary, who has contracted Covid-19.

The UK prime minister and chancellor had initially tried to avoid isolation by saying they were part of a pilot testing scheme, prompting an outcry from members of the public and backbench Conservative MPs.

Their U-turn came after only three hours amid chaos at No 10 over plans to drop many Covid restrictions for “freedom day” on Monday, and minutes after the communities secretary, Robert Jenrick, had defended their plans to continue working from Downing Street.

It means the prime minister, chancellor and health secretary will all be isolating, along with hundreds of thousands of others due to exposure to coronavirus, when restrictions are dropped across England from Monday.

A Downing Street spokesperson said: “The prime minister has been contacted by NHS test and trace to say he is a contact of someone with Covid. He was at Chequers when contacted by test and trace and will remain there to isolate. He will not be taking part in the testing pilot.

“He will continue to conduct meetings with ministers remotely. The chancellor has also been contacted and will also isolate as required and will not be taking part in the pilot.”

Sunak tweeted: “Whilst the test and trace pilot is fairly restrictive, allowing only essential government business, I recognise that even the sense that the rules aren’t the same for everyone is wrong. To that end I’ll be self-isolating as normal and not taking part in the pilot.”

Javid tested positive for coronavirus on Saturday. The prime minister is reported to have had a lengthy meeting with him at No 10 on Friday.

02:29

‘Important everybody sticks to rules’: Johnson explains U-turn on self-isolation – video

Downing Street earlier confirmed Johnson and Sunak were part of a pilot scheme that allows certain people to have daily rapid flow tests instead of having to self-isolate. “They will be conducting only essential government business during this period,” said a spokesperson.

Reaction to the news was rapid and furious, with instances on social media of people reporting they were going to delete the NHS Covid-19 app from their phones.

The shadow health secretary, Jonathan Ashworth, said many people across the UK would be dismayed by the “special, exclusive rule” for Johnson and Sunak.

“There will be parents across the country who have struggled this year when their children have been sent home because they were in a bubble and had to self-isolate,” he told Sky News.

“There will be workers across the country that have to isolate because they’ve been pinged, including in public services, including the NHS. For many of them, waking up this morning to hear that there is a special rule, an exclusive rule, for Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, they will be saying that this looks like one rule for them and something else for the rest of us.”

Kate Nicholls, the CEO of UK Hospitality, which represents bars, hotels and others in the sector, said: “It cannot be right that only those on pilot projects are exempt from the need to self-isolate. We need a workable and pragmatic self-isolation policy which keeps people safe but also keeps the economy moving.”

Jonathan Bartley, the co-leader of the Green party, said: “Hundreds of thousands of young people, including my children, had their education and lives repeatedly turned upside down again and again after dutifully and responsibly isolating. And now this. Anger doesn’t begin to cover it.”

Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair’s former director of communications at Downing Street, described it as the “Johnson-Sunak test pilot scandal” and predicted it would “cut through” to the public even more directly than the controversy surrounding the lockdown journeys undertaken to Durham by Dominic Cummings, Johnson’s former chief adviser.

Organisations taking part have to have an asymptomatic testing site set up. Individuals who have been “pinged” after being in contact with someone who has tested positive for Covid can go to work on the basis that they are using lateral flow tests, but must self-isolate when not at work.

The organisations known to be part of the trial have given their consent to be identified, according to No 10, which added that a full list would be published after the results have been recorded.

A spokesperson said the study was separate from a better known pilot scheme, outlined online by the Department of Health and Social Care, which splits participants at random into two groups. In that study, those in a control group will be given a PCR test and must self-isolate as normal for 10 days, while participants in another group benefit from having a 24-hour release from self-isolation if daily lateral flow tests return negative results.

Javid was self-isolating on Saturday after testing positive for Covid, as senior public health leaders from across the UK accused Boris Johnson on Sunday of “letting Covid rip” by relaxing legal restrictions.

The health secretary, who is double-vaccinated, said he had mild symptoms and confirmed the result of a lateral flow test with a positive PCR test.

“I will continue to isolate and work from home,” Javid tweeted.

Labour accuses Gove of lying about extent of vetting for PPE deals

Michael Gove has been accused of falsely claiming all personal protective equipment (PPE) contracts for the NHS went through eight steps of vetting, as it emerged this did not happen with a deal for millions of unusable face masks linked to a Conservative adviser.

Rowena Mason www.theguardian.com

Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, said Gove and other ministers were “apparently lying to the public and lying to parliament” by claiming that “every single procurement decision went through an eight-stage process”.

She uncovered the fact that the much-vaunted eight-step process was not undertaken in the case of Ayanda Capital, which was awarded £252m of deals for PPE supplies in spring 2020. Face masks provided by Ayanda were ultimately unusable because the Department of Health and Social Care had specified masks with ear loops, despite the NHS requiring masks that looped over the head.

The process was also not followed in the case of PestFix, a pest control supplies company with net assets of £18,000 that was awarded a contract to supply PPE worth £350m to the NHS, some of which also did not meet the health service’s technical standards.

In answer to a parliamentary question, the health minister, Jo Churchill, said: “The eight-stage process to assess and approve offers of support to supply [PPE] evolved over a short period of time at the end of April 2020 to formalise the checks quickly put in place by the cross-government PPE procurement cell in March 2020.

“Contracts with Ayanda Capital and PestFix pre-dated the formalised eight-stage assurance process but these suppliers were evaluated by officials on financial standing, technical compliance and ability to perform the contract. The contracts are awarded by the appropriate departmental accounting officer in line with our terms and conditions.”

Internal documents released as part of a judicial review case revealed in May that Ayanda, a “family office” finance house in London, was awarded two PPE contracts for a total of £252m after being referred to the VIP lane for assessing deals because its representative, Andrew Mills, was an adviser to Liz Truss, the trade secretary.

Officials pushed for the contracts to be processed as quickly as possible, with one marking emails “URGENT VIP CASE” and “VERY URGENT VIP ESCALATION”, saying that if the deal did not happen: “Andrew will escalate as high as he can possibly go!”

The two contracts were approved on 30 April 2020, five days after Ayanda was put into the VIP lane, but before required financial checks had been carried out on the company, despite a Cabinet Office official raising “major issues or concerns” because of inadequate availability of public financial information and a “low” credit score.

Ayanda has consistently said it fulfilled the contract according to the specifications it was given.

Rayner, who is the shadow chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, Gove’s opposite number, said:

“Why have Michael Gove and government ministers apparently been lying to the public and lying to parliament to try to cover this up? Michael Gove needs to explain why he has not been telling the truth.

“We need a fully independent investigation into the Tories’ VIP fast track for PPE and testing contracts to get to the bottom of who got the contracts, how they got them and what connections they have to Conservative ministers and the Conservative party.”

Jo Maugham QC, director of Good Law Project, which brought the legal challenge to the Pestfix and Ayanda contracts, said: “You begin to wonder if there are any statements from ministers that you can rely on. It looks like they’ve been infected by Johnsonism: total lack of interest in the truth.”

A government spokesperson said: “All PPE contracts went through a robust process of checks and controls led by officials. These contracts have delivered over 9bn items of PPE to protect frontline workers.”

The government is defending the judicial review over the PPE contracts, arguing the VIP route and the contracts awarded, including to PestFix, Ayanda and another company, were lawful and reasonable as the government tried to rapidly meet a serious shortfall of PPE at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic.

A National Audit Office report in November said 144 referrals to the VIP lane had come from ministers’ private offices, but said of its investigation: “Ministers had properly declared their interests, and we found no evidence of their involvement in procurement decisions or contract management.”