Will they, won’t they – Devon Councils divided, EDDC yet to declare

Councils in Devon are divided as to whether they will follow an order to fly the Union flag on the Duke of York’s 60th birthday (February 19).

The Union Jack will be flown outside Exeter and Torbay’s civic buildings, but spokesman for those two councils said this was because it is flown permanently.

Torridge and Mid Devon councils have confirmed they will be flying the flag, but North Devon have said that they won’t be.

South Hams District Council and West Devon Borough Council said they had not been given any directive to fly the flag.

A North Devon Council spokesman said: “We have now been advised that, because Prince Andrew is no longer a working member of the Royal Family, we are not being asked to fly the flag on his birthday. As such, we won’t be.”

A spokesperson for Torbay Council said: “The Union Flag is flown all year round on Torquay Town Hall, so it will be flying on Wednesday 19 February.”

An Exeter City Council spokesman said: “The Union Flag is permanently flown from outside the Civic Centre and the Guildhall.”

A spokesman for South Hams and West Devon council’s said: “Having chatted to a number of colleagues, no one has been given a directive to do this.”

A spokesman for Mid Devon District Council said: “Our Member Services team have confirmed that we intend to fly the Union Jack on February 19 as per the edict from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, and our normal protocol for senior members of the royal family.”

A spokesman for Torridge District Council said that they would be auctioning the request.

Teignbridge District Council and Devon County Council did not reply to the request for comment, while East Devon District Council initially said that they hadn’t been asked to fly the flag, then said new information had been received, but did not reply any further.

“I understand DCMS and the royal household considering how the policy applies to members of the royal family who have stepped back from public duties.”

https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/devon-councils-fly-union-jack-3822361

Owl says: come on EDDC time to make your mind up!

Business as usual at EDDC?

A correspondent writes:

RUBBER STAMP WIELDING AT THE CONTINUITY COUNCIL – HEALTH AND EDUCATION UP FOR GRABS

And so East Devon’s endorsement of the nebulous Heart of The South West Local Enterprise Partnership goes on. A Cabinet exhausted by a long meeting on Wednesday night rubber stamped new terms of reference for the Joint Committee which runs it. Usual suspects, “Independents” Ian Thomas, Ben Ingham and Kevin Blakey thought it better in than out, and if the financial cost to EDDC was under £3,000 per annum it was worth it for “a seat at the table”.

EDA Leader, Paul Arnott, pointed out that they were also about to rubber stamp a significant change to the Joint Committee’s terms of reference. CEO Mark Williams’ report, which he had placed almost last on the agenda, was asking that the cabinet “approves the amendments to the Heart of the South West Joint Committee’s list of functions in the Arrangements document (highlighted in red italics Appendix A attached)”. To be fair to Williams, he had used red ink.

These amendments were highly significant. One was to “continue discussions /negotiations with the Government and Government agencies to achieve direct intervention, support, funding and powers to the benefit of the HotSW”

And what might these interventions be?

Well for starters they want to ” Design and deliver public sector reform where this will deliver improved productivity to the HotSW, eg health, education.”

Health and Education!

Yes, there it is, at the back of a report, unheralded by Mr Williams. The unaccountable HOSW now has Health and Education in its sandpit too. Despite a good effort from Councillor Jess Bailey to ask Williams to address Councillor Arnott’s point, the CEO as ever yawned, pulled a face as if this was all beneath him, and swerved all mention of this significant change.

Soon the HOSW will be buzzing with advocates for private medicine and for further private stakes in state education. They will be able to sit alongside all the developers and their chums who have been at its heart from the beginning.

Business as usual at EDDC.

Is Ingham’s regime floundering in the Exmouth surf?

Is Exmouth girding its loins to fight reckless panic decisions taken about Queens Drive? EDDC cabinet have now considered a proposition for yet another marketing scheme – see below. Driven by the alleged £3m Philip Skinner has wasted on this site already, Owl’s informants suggest the Hemingway soft marketing exercise revealed six bids for Harbour View site and none for a hotel. In order to try to justify this £3M, Ingham and co have now decided to offer hotel and Harbour View as one site in the hopes that one of these bids might want Harbour View so desperately that they will offer to build the hotel!

If no hotelier wants this site, there is must be a good reason for it. How would a bunch of amateurs know better? Is there a secret plan B for the Council to take all the building risk with our money and then find a hotel operator to lease it? This would be beyond madness. Bit like a slow motion action replay of the ill-fated Bowling Alley Iconic Regeneration plan for Exmouth that started more than fifteen years ago (now Ocean run by LED, subsidised by the ratepayer).

https://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/approval-hotel-and-restaurant-seafront-plans-1-6501744

Daniel Clark Exmouth Journal:

At its meeting on Wednesday (February 5), East Devon District Council’s cabinet voted by five votes to three to launch a formal marketing exercise to identify a developer/operator for the site.

The plot represents the third phase of the seafront regeneration project, following the completion of the road and car park realignment in phase one and the imminent construction of a watersports centre.

Suggested uses for the site include a new two storey café/restaurant on the existing Harbour View café site, a mix of play and open public space, and a 60-80 room 3-4 star hotel.

A marketing exercise will now take place to see if there is any commercial interest in the proposals.

Bids will be received and reviewed by May, and then a report is set to go the cabinet with a recommendation on the preferred developer/operator in July 2020.

The temporary attractions, including the Queen’s Drive Space, will continue on the site for this summer.

Cllr Nick Hookway though said that he had some major concerns, saying the council is held in low regard by Exmouth residents where there is a deep mistrust over the proposals.

But Cllr Bruce de Saram backed the proposals and said: “People will have fun and we want them to come to Exmouth and have fun, so I am 100 per cent behind this report and getting the project completed within the timescale.”

Cllr Geoff Jung said that the cabinet appeared to be damned whatever they chose to do as the decision to realign Queen’s Drive and the car park has cost the council around £3m and they have to find a way of paying for it.

A cabinet report recommended that the Queen’s Drive Delivery Group continue to meet in private however, the cabinet overturned the recommendation.

They agreed that from March 1, 2020, the Queen’s Drive Delivery Group should sit in public that an Exmouth councillor should be part of the panel who agree the selection criteria for the commercial development.

Owl thinks transparency is long overdue and doubts that any of the profligate £3M will ever be repaid.

Will they, won’t they? – Now no place for EDDC to hide!

The UK Government will tell councils they are no longer required to fly flags to mark Prince Andrew’s 60th birthday after he stepped back from public duties over his friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The policy of flying Union flags on royal birthdays was being re-examined after councils were initially ordered to do so for Andrew, as is the custom.

Downing Street said the matter was being looked into after critics branded the celebration “crass and offensive”.

A UK government spokesman said: “The Department of Culture, Media and Sport will be advising councils that there is no requirement to fly flags on February 19 following the decision by the Duke of York to step back from public duties for the foreseeable future.”

EDDC cannot now hide behind an instruction and will have to make its own mind up on whether or not to fly the flag.

Owl will simply watch what happens. (Even if the flag is flown in HQ Honiton will anyone notice?)

https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/britain/uk-councils-no-longer-required-to-raise-flags-for-prince-andrews-birthday-38934200.html

Councils in crisis with more tax rises and service cuts due revised 9 Feb

Report reveals English local authorities’ financial despair after decade of austerity.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/feb/05/councils-in-crisis-with-more-tax-rises-and-service-cuts-due?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Council tax payers in England face near universal rises on top of increased fees and charges to pay for what in many cases will be reduced levels of local services, according to a survey of local authorities.

It reveals that 97% of local authorities will put council tax up again in April to cope with a growing financial crisis, and the same proportion will raise charges for services such as parking, garden waste disposal and aspects of social care.

The latest State of Local Government analysis reveals widespread despair among councils over their financial health after a decade of austerity policies in which spending has been cut in half and the gap between demand and resources has grown.

More than a fifth of councils said the cuts to frontline services that they would be forced to make in 2020-21 were of a scale and impact that would be noticeable to the general public. One in 10 said shrinking resources meant they were in danger of being unable to meet their legal obligation to deliver statutory services.

Asked which services would have increased fees and charges, councils most commonly mentioned green waste, planning permissions, car parking, leisure and arts centre memberships, burials and cremations and pest control. One replied: “All we can get away with.”

Three-quarters of councils had no confidence that local government finance arrangements were sustainable, while only 3% were confident that the government would act to halt the council funding crisis, despite increasing pressures on child protection, adult social care and homelessness services.

Jonathan Carr-West, the chief executive of the Local Government Information Unit, a thinktank that carried out the annual survey, said: “The state of local government finances is dire. Eight years later and the message continues to be the same, a broken record. It is simply unacceptable that the government has let things get to this point.”

He added: “This isn’t local government asking for more money. This is about a fundamentally flawed system that has been broken for years and the government continually refusing to acknowledge or engage in a proper solution.

“Sticking plasters will not solve these critical issues. Our social care system is no longer on the edge, it’s fallen off the cliff. Our children’s services aren’t at breaking point, they’re broken. These issues cannot wait another year to be solved.”

Andrew Gwynne, the shadow communities secretary, said the survey should be a wake-up call for ministers. “The fact is that years of neglect have created this crisis. We need to see urgent action,” he said.

In the last few years there have been widespread cuts in some high-profile areas of local government such as Sure Start centres, youth clubs, special educational needs and libraries, as well as in less prominent areas such as planning, family support services and environmental health.

Scepticism that the government will pump more money into local government – or even publish its social care funding green paper, delayed since summer 2017 – has led many councils to consider alternative income streams, with 75% of surveyed councils reporting that they have borrowed to invest in commercial property schemes.

Two-thirds of councils said the current 3% cap on council tax increases – which councils can breach only if they get residents to agree to the rise via a local referendum – should be be scrapped to enable them to raise more cash from residents to fund local services.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: “Next year, councils in England will have access to £49.1bn – the biggest annual real-terms increase in spending power in a decade – including an extra £1.5bn for social care. The funding plans provide certainty for councils who are responsible for delivering the services their communities need.”

Update: The LGiU (The Local Government information Unit) and MJ (Municipal Journal) have collaborated on the State of Local Government Finance Report every January since 2012 to coincide with English councils setting their annual budgets. The results of their annual survey give a snapshot of the key pressures facing councils and the impact of ongoing financial uncertainty on their communities.

More detailed summary of statistics 2020 report here:

https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/governance/396-governance-news/42693-one-in-seven-councils-predict-rise-in-judicial-challenges-over-service-provision-report

Full report here:

Click to access LGIU-State-of-local-government-finance-2020.pdf

Repair bill jeopardises Tory NHS pledges

The National Audit Office (NAO) has just published its eighth report on the financial sustainability of the NHS. The NAO has expanded on this report by publishing a companion report to set out the facts on capital investment in the NHS.

NHS financial management and sustainability

Review of capital expenditure in the NHS

The chaos is well summarised by Chris Smyth Whitehall Editor, The Times:

Boris Johnson’s NHS promises may not be met because of financial chaos and a mounting repair backlog in the health service, the spending watchdog has suggested.

Health chiefs have taken £4.3 billion out of the buildings budgets to bail out day-to-day overspends, and hospitals are having to sell land to get by, the National Audit Office has found.

Mr Johnson wants to build 40 hospitals, but a report to be published today states that long-term buildings and infrastructure planning has been delayed by “political events” and the NHS was struggling to come up with a capital spending strategy. A maintenance backlog has risen to £6.5 billion, some of it posing urgent risks to patient care. One in seven health service buildings predates the NHS’s founding in 1948.

The NAO also found that parts of the NHS had become “serious financially unstable”.

Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, said: “The short-term fixes that were introduced to manage the NHS’s finances are not sustainable. The Department of Health and Social Care continues to provide some trusts with short- term loans just to meet their day-to-day costs with little hope they will be repaid. This is not a sustainable way to run public bodies.

“To bring about lasting stability, the Department and NHS England and NHS Improvement need to move away from short-term financial fixes and provide longer-term solutions.”

Sally Gainsbury, of the Nuffield Trust think tank, said: “The government will shortly enshrine in law cash increases for the NHS England budget every year until 2024. But today’s report raises serious questions about whether this new money will make a difference.”

EDDC – will they, won’t they fly the flag.

Town halls across the UK have been officially reminded they must fly the Union Jack flag on 19 February, to celebrate Prince Andrew’s 60th birthday.

The order to fly the flag — emailed out by civil servant Matt Stevenson — has drawn heavy criticism in some quarters.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-andrew-birthday-union-jack-flags-town-hall-viriginia-roberts-a9320941.html

Owl will watch what happens.

Royal carpet maker Axminster to appoint administrators

Truly shocking breaking news.

A company which supplies carpets to the Royal Family says it intends to appoint administrators to try to protect the business.

Devon-based Axminster Carpets said it was focused on “securing a sustainable future” for those who believe in “quality craftsmanship”.

Carpet making in the town dates back to 1755, with the current iteration of the company being established in 1937.

As many as 90 jobs could be at risk if the company goes into administration.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-51393160?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/england/devon&link_location=live-reporting-story

Save Clyst St Mary – draft comments on Winslade Park

Following interest in the earlier post giving dates of the Public Consultation on Winslade Park, Owl will now post the draft comments from Gaeron Kayley, Chairman Save Clyst St Mary Residents’ Association for general interest.

As a group, we (Save Clyst St Mary) are not anti-development. We endeavour to transparently communicate with everyone in all parts of our village (together with the wider community) on major developmental proposals in this area, to enable them to make informed choices. We represent over 300 members of the community and our numbers continue to grow. We have successfully campaigned against inappropriate, unsustainable development in this area since 2013.

Comments on Winslade Park Development in Clyst St Mary 

 The major hurdle to overcome for any sizeable developmental proposals in this area is increased traffic. There is apprehension from local residents and the wider community that potential future traffic from this development will completely consume and overwhelm the capacity of the local highway network at peak times. To ensure future development does not detrimentally impact on universal accessibility to employment, retail and leisure for existing communities, visitors and commuters, guarantees to provide vital, substantial improvements to out-dated road networks and essential infrastructure must be established before or during the implementation of these major radical plans.

 At present, a reduction in car-based transport in this area is restricted. There is inadequate access to bus services and no safe cycling routes via the A376 Exmouth road. The Digby and Topsham train services and the Sowton Park and Ride are also not easily accessible sustainably from the village. Therefore, it is highly likely that this proposed development will generate major increased use of cars and other vehicles. Reference to published 2011 National Statistics (the next Census figures should be published in 2021) show how people in Clyst Valley ward accessed employment; 74% drove with 5% travelling as passengers (so a total of 79% used cars or vans), only 4% used road based public transport (buses), 2% used rail, 4% cycled (2% used powered cycles) and 9% walked. Even with access to sustainable transport alternatives, it remains a fact that many people prefer the convenience of cars as a means of transport to access employment, retail and leisure. Unfortunately, public transport services can be expensive and frequently do not go where people want at the time they wish to travel.

 Realistically, since these 2011 statistics, traffic has significantly increased in and around Clyst St Mary as a result of the cumulative impact of the expansion of commercial/employment (e.g. around Skypark, Hill Barton and Greendale) and new residential development. This is already having extensive, adverse effects, with traffic gridlock at peak times in Clyst St Mary on the A3052 and the A376 around the Clyst St Mary roundabout and Junction 30 of the M5 motorway.

 This has lead to unacceptable and dangerous “vehicle rat-running” through existing residential areas in Clyst St Mary to avoid the congestion – so, obviously, increased vehicle use from this new major development will potentially intensify these problems.

 It is questionable whether these proposals provide adequate on-site parking. Developers are only required to provide minimum car parking in their proposals to try to encourage non-car based transport. In practice this has lead to inconsiderate parking in nearby residential areas (exacerbated by commuter, rugby and holiday parking), causing many residents distress and creating dangerous highway safety issues throughout many village areas. In an effort to alleviate the serious traffic and parking issues in Clyst St Mary, the Parish Council has compiled a comprehensive traffic report for presentation to Devon County Highways.

 From published evidence, (Hydrock’s Traffic Consultants’ Report in Application 16/2460/MOUT – page 2 para.1.2.3. – Document 2480191 dated 17/11/2016 on EDDC’s Planning website), it is stated that in recent years a total of 800 staff worked at Friends Provident and DEFRA and historically peak staffing figures for the entire site were around 1,500 staff. Consequently, the existing authorisation for traffic generation from 1,500 staff at Winslade Park cannot now act as permission for traffic generation from a potentially much larger workforce. In addition, there will be substantial traffic from the residential numbers, plus visitors, delivery vehicles etc to also be considered. A new rigorous traffic assessment and plan is vital to prove that the highway network can cope with such significant traffic increases.

 Sustainable brownfield development and regeneration is supported. Theoretically, the concept of a ‘Wellness Community’ flourishing with living, employment and leisure provision in a stunning rural parkland environment is very appealing. However, these sizeable development proposals do seem disproportionate in a rural village location, making scaled-down proposals more appropriate for greater sustainability.

 In planning terms sustainability is where economic, environmental and social aspects must be equally balanced to avoid one destroying the others. Focussing too heavily on economic growth, pressurising existing infrastructure (e.g. highways) and oversubscribed essential services (e.g. medical, health, educational and transport) can detrimentally impact on the wellbeing of existing smaller communities harming their social, cultural and environmental characteristics.

 Government Planning Policy cautions against major new development in areas which are affected by flooding which could give rise to an increased flooding risk. However, these proposals have included commercial development (Zone B) beside the entrance drive and parking (Zone J) in two high risk flood zone areas. The Local Authority and the Environment Agency must ensure that future development will not increase the risk of flooding and a worsening of air and water quality and in an already fragile area.

 Existing ground gradients, at present, cause problems with drainage flows and frequent gully overflowing, with recurring flooding at the bottom of Winslade Park Avenue and lower village areas, especially when the flood plains are at capacity. Development on the elevated green fields increases the overall flood risk to lower areas and results in impermeable surfaces escalating that threat. It is considered that the existing drainage systems in this area are inadequate and any sizeable, additional surface and foul drainage connections are likely to cause significant problems without major improvements to the existing drainage infrastructure.

 The amalgamation of two strikingly different categories of land (namely previously developed brownfield sites and agricultural green fields) on very diverse locations in this village being merged into just one planning application will be a contentious issue. Local people may welcome the sustainable re-generation of the Winslade Park office complex brownfield site but will strongly oppose residential development on the green fields in Zone A (known locally as the Plymouth Brethren site) and there will only be one planning decision by EDDC of either approval or refusal for both brownfield and green-field areas.

 Unquestionably, in planning terms the weight against the green-field proposals is very significant. Strategy 7 (Development in the Countryside) of the East Devon Local Development Plan 2013-2031 applies to these green fields. It states that the countryside is defined as all those parts of the plan area that are outside the Built-up Area Boundaries and outside of site specific allocations. Development in the countryside will only be permitted where it is in accordance with a specific Local or Neighbourhood Plan policy that explicitly permits such development and where it would not harm the distinctive landscape, amenity and environmental qualities within which it is located.

 The green field areas of Zone A are not included in the current East Devon Local Development Plan to 2031 which was fully adopted on 28th January 2016 or the locally-prepared Made Bishops Clyst Neighbourhood Plan which was adopted in March 2017 and finally, this land has not been included within the up-to-date Built-Up Area Boundary (BUAB) for development in Clyst St Mary within the new Villages Plan (which forms part of the Local Development Plan to 2031) and was only adopted as recently as 26th July 2018.

 The public perception is that planning policies contained in such labour-intensive, costly, legal planning documents continue to be relevant and remain workable in the relatively short term since their adoption to achieve best value. Communities presume that major planning policies adopted quite recently will not now be waived, altered or amended to favour sizeable development on green-field sites, especially when protection was specifically focused on the Plymouth Brethren green field (Zone A) by its deletion from the Local Development Plan to 2031. It is high-grade agricultural land, comprising primarily a Grade 3a best and most versatile agricultural classification. As long as records have existed, the green field areas in these proposals have been farmed by locals over many generations.

 This Parish’s preference in the current, locally-prepared Neighbourhood Plan was to direct development in Clyst St Mary to the vacated Winslade Park office complex brownfield site. Although an allocation for up to 150 homes currently exists in East Devon’s Local Development Plan for the previously developed brownfield areas of this office complex, this 2016 allocation does not give carte blanche to divert major residential development to green fields – brown and green field sites are at opposite ends of the planning spectrum.

 Re-use of the Winslade Park employment floor-space on the brownfield site, with refurbishment of the much-valued indoor sports and leisure facilities including fitness studios, swimming pool, the introduction of cafes, bars and a range of retail outlets and services, whilst protecting the stunning green parkland, outdoor sports pitches and tennis courts is supportable in principle. However, such sizeable employment proposals, plus the 67 new homes in Zones A and D, are not sustainable. Residential development being redirected to green fields is a price too high for many residents. National and Local Planning Policy states that protection should be afforded to green fields to preserve the landscape amenities and environmental qualities of the countryside. Clyst St Mary is NOT an urban environment. The emerging Agriculture Bill 2019-2020 is a radical re-think for land management to ensure protection of healthy soil, clean air and water, green infrastructure and wildlife whilst defending against flooding to deliver quality of life and environmental benefits for communities.

 The green field proposals for residential development will have an overbearing impact on many existing properties in Winslade Park Avenue and Clyst Valley Road, creating overlooking, overshadowing and increased noise and disturbance, which represents an un-neighbourly form of development, detrimentally affecting the existing residents’ rights to the enjoyment of their dwellings and gardens. This green space creates a buffer between the existing built-up areas and the open countryside.

 There will be widespread encroachment on the rural landscape amenity of the area, particularly with the highly elevated site being clearly visible from many local viewpoints. The loss of green fields, clean air, water, green infrastructure and wildlife is insupportable by many people in this rural community. Planning policies seek to protect and enhance the quality, character and amenity value of the countryside. A high level of protection should be given to valued landscapes, wildlife habitats and natural resources. These residential proposals are out of character with the existing green, open rural area.

 East Devon’s adopted Local Plan to 2031 sets out a strategic approach ‘to protect and maintain the local amenity quality and character of local environments, to conserve and promote wise use of land and protect and enhance the landscape character of East Devon including the protection, enhancement and management of networks of biodiversity and green infrastructure’.

Gaeron Kayley – Chairman Save Clyst St Mary Residents’ Association

  

Quite the Action Man – Simon Jupp MP

I decided to stand to be a member of the Transport Select Committee and was successfully elected on February 4. I plan to use this new platform to scrutinise the government’s transport plans and highlight the need for investment in the South West. I can’t back HS2 when the main and branch railway lines in Devon simply are not fit for purpose. (Simon Jupp)

https://www.devonlive.com/news/news-opinion/cant-back-hs2-main-branch-3812988

BS Shandford care home, Jupp calls public meeting 3pm this Friday at Shandford

Owl has been informed that so many members of the public have written to Simon Jupp MP that he is holding a public meeting at Shandford at 3pm this Friday (7 Feb).

The BBC Spotlight article yesterday highlighted the concern and incredulity inmates and their relatives have over the proposed closure. It finished with a statement from Abbeyfield that closure would continue on the basis that local professionals had concluded it was unviable, as reported by Owl yesterday.

Local owlets have pointed Owl to the following quotes from County Cllr Christine Channon to the BS Town Council (Cllr Channon is also Simon Jupp’s Agent):

Minutes 23 Sept 2019:

She [Cllr Channon] too was very concerned to learn about the proposed closure of Shandford. She understood that twenty-two Abbeyfield homes were to be closed across the country and four “super homes” were to be built. She said he had contacted Devon County Council (DCC) Adult Services to see if they had been informed of the decision; they had not. She explained that Shandford was well run, financially viable, with all rooms being occupied plus a number of names on the waiting list — she felt the decision was just greed! Five of the residents were aged over 100 years and any move could seriously affect their health. She felt the community needed to get together and support the residents and staff as much as possible. She concluded by advising that HRH The Prince of Wales was Patron of Abbeyfield Society and everyone should write to him with their concerns.

And Minutes 28 Oct 2019

County Cllr Mrs C Channon reported:
Things were moving in a helpful direction regarding Shandford. She was impressed by how the residents of the town had been both concerned and supportive in attempts to keep the home open. She had taken legal advice at Devon County Council (DCC) and it seemed that if the premises were sold, Abbeyfield would be unable to take the asset without providing similar alternative accommodation. She understood there was a view the home could be managed as is and she and others were working to see if it was possible to move forward. She had arranged a meeting with the Chief Executive of Abbeyfield and would report to the Town Council in due course.

By all accounts then, this is not a run-down or derelict place. It has had investment and is of similar size to many local care homes. It has good reviews from the CQC.
https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-434970224

Owl can only hope that Simon Jupp’s meeting is not just a PR exercise and that he can knock heads together and look for other options. Closure could have tragic consequences on the old and vulnerable who react badly to being moved from what they regard as their home.

Road Closed until end of the month

How come a road through Colyton can be closed with little or no warning for a month?

This picture says it all.

 

Photo: Chris Carson Midweek Herald

Owl has learned that Colyton Parish Council has launched, literally over the weekend, an emergency free bus service for residents while Coly Road is closed.

The town’s most direct route to Seaton and Axminster (Coly Road is the main southern access to Colyton) was shut to traffic on Monday (February 3) when contractors moved in to lay pipes for the development of a new housing estate.

Due to the road closure, which is expected to last until the end of the month, the regular 885 bus service is unable to run through Colyton Market Square.

As a result the parish council has organised an emergency minibus service to be run by local company, Stamps Coaches. The service will provide three journeys to Axminster a day and three to Seaton, from Monday to Friday, until the roadworks are competed.

The times are: To Axminster Station: Return buses will leave Colyton Market Square at 9am; 11am and 1.30pm. To Seaton, via Colyford: Return buses will leave Colyton Market Square at 10am; 12pm and 2.30pm.

https://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/free-bus-trips-to-axminster-and-seaton-available-1-6497945

 

 

 

Winslade Park Development Clyst St Mary Public Consultation

Owl has just been sent this update from Gaeron Kayley – Chairman Save Clyst St Mary Residents’ Association to residents of Clyst St Mary – (some of the consultation dates referred to have now passed).

Dear Resident,

Having viewed the Burrington Estates’ development proposals at the first drop-in session of the Public Consultation at the Village Hall on Monday 3rd February 2020, we have produced some comments for your information that we intend forwarding to the Developers at hello@winsladepark.com and these are attached below (not included in this post).

If you also wish to make comments about these substantial development proposals, we hope these particulars may assist in guiding you. The purpose of a Public Consultation is to give the public an opportunity to make comments to the Developers which may influence their subsequent planning application to East Devon District Council for this future development, so it is your opportunity to express your views.

The link below is accessed via http://www.winsladepark.com and includes the Public Consultation Presentation Boards which show the extent of the development on both the Winslade Park site and the Plymouth Brethren field

Click to access Winslade-Park-Consultation-Presentation-Boards-web-smaller.pdf

There are two further drop-in sessions (Thursday 6th February from 1pm to 5pm and Saturday 8th February from 9am to 12pm) at the Village Hall.

Furthermore, a Planning Director from Avalon Planning and Heritage will be presenting these major development proposals for the former Aviva Winslade Park site and the Plymouth Brethren field at 7.00 p.m. on Monday 10th February 2020 in the Clyst St Mary Primary School Hall, before the commencement of the next Parish Council meeting. Members of the public are welcome to attend this meeting.

Regards

Closure of Care Home in Budleigh Salterton

East Devon MP Simon Jupp has questioned the ‘hugely regrettable’ decision to close a Budleigh Salterton care home.

https://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/simon-jupp-questions-budleigh-care-home-closure-1-6495643

He has written to [Abbeyfield] care home bosses questioning them over the decision to close Shandford, in Station Road.

The Abbeyfield Society last week announced the care home will be closing at the end of March.

The society said keeping the home open was no longer viable due to ‘the systematic recruitment challenges’ and ‘significant’ renovation work needed.

In a letter to Abbeyfield chief executive David McCullough, seen by the Journal, Mr Jupp has asked for the financial assessment of the works to be published and queried whether money from wills of former residents could be used to fund repairs.

He also asked if staff have been asked to sign non-disclosure agreements – sometimes known as gagging orders.

Mr Jupp questioned when Abbeyfield will know to which care homes residents will be transferred and what steps will be taken to guarantee their safety and security.

In response, the Abbeyfield Society said no staff have been asked to sign a gagging order and more than £1.7 million – including legacies from wills – has been spent on renovations over the last eight years.

The society also said it will provide residential care or housing and financial help towards the elderly in Budleigh and the surrounding villages.

Mr Jupp said: “It’s hugely regrettable that Abbeyfield Shandford is closing and I want to find out more details.

“What we have got is the issue of people being moved when it is extremely stressful and affects their health.

“It’s less about the building and more about the people.

“Elderly people moving care homes can be extremely damaging to their mental health.”

A spokesman for the Abbeyfield Society said: “We welcome Mr Jupp’s offer to meet with The Abbeyfield Society to discuss his concerns and are in the process of reaching out to his office to set up a meeting”.

Last week (Jan 29) the Journal ran an article in which Abbeyfield were quoted as saying that money raised from the potential sale of the site would be used “for the benefit of older people in Budleigh Salterton”. The society has been working with a local volunteer group to return the home to trustee management. The article also quoted an Abbeyfield spokesman as saying: “A group of local people, made up of former professional in areas including care home management, finance, property and law, undertook a detailed review of the infrastructure, building condition and financial performance of the home. Unfortunately they also concluded that keeping the care home was not a viable option”.

Owl’s local sources are saying that considerable sums from Budleigh Salterton and lower Otter Valley residents have been given to this charity since it started in the 1950s (merged with Abbeyfield 2012). They complain that there has been a lack of transparency over who has actually been running it for the past few months and why there was no public meeting called to consider other options to closure in March.

BBC Spotlight were seen on site yesterday and may feature an article on the situation tonight.

Owl believes that lack of transparency in dealing with money donated by the public is fundamentally wrong and does nothing but breed suspicion. Owl hopes that there has been no conflict of interest in those involved in the review and their possible role in any potential recipient organisation of funds released.

EDDC to hold master class on Jointery — Wednesday 5 February, 5.30pm

On Wednesday 5 February EDDC is going to hold a masterclass on Jointery (noun – the art of weaving liaison/co-ordination/steering committees/groups into such a complex web no-one knows who’s really in charge and no-one has time to do anything anyway).

https://democracy.eastdevon.gov.uk//documents/g233/Public%20reports%20pack%2005th-Feb-2020%2017.30%20Cabinet.pdf?T=10

Buried deep – see agenda Item 20, page 114 of the Cabinet Papers, subject: Heart of the South West Joint Committee Governance Arrangements.

Step back with Owl to 2014 when the Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP), covering Devon and Cornwall was first formed. The government’s idea was that this should be business chaired and business led. Consequently, of the 20 board members only six were elected representatives of the 19 local/unitary authorities covered.

In 2017 Mary Ney published a critical review of the unacceptably poor governance arrangements in most LEPs. Following this the Joint Committee referred to in the EDDC cabinet paper was set up in March 2018. A single representative from each local authority formed the membership plus co-opted members from HotSW, transport and health bodies. One might have thought that this was to provide some sort of accountable oversight of the LEP. But the EDDC cabinet papers say that the Joint Committee acts as a single voice to Government on socio-economic and environmental issues and makes the case for additional powers and funding to be transferred to its individual members for the benefit of the people of Devon and Somerset. Accountability seems to have been relgated to the Joint Scrutiny Committee which can barely scrape a quorum together.

Where does this leave HotSW, until now our formal devolution link with government?

Perhaps some clues can be found in para 4 of the cabinet paper which explains why a review (and more funding in cash and officer effort) is needed.

Changes in Government policy away from large devolution ‘deals’ to a more targeted dialogue on key themes of relevance to the local authorities and partners, e.g housing. The Joint Committee’s influencing role has become increasingly important as recognised by Ministers, local MPs and Government officials. The ambition remains to draw down additional functions, powers and funding from Government.

The evolution of the Joint Committee’s role from agreeing policy (the HotSW Productivity Strategy) to overseeing delivery of the Strategy alongside the LEP.

The developing relationships with other key local partnerships to ensure that there are appropriate reporting lines, ie, HotSW LEP Joint Scrutiny Committee, Peninsula Transport Board, HotSW Local Transport Board, and Great South West.

No! Great South West is not another rail franchise as the name suggests, it is, in fact, another example of Jointery which has crept out of the woodwork.

Steve Hindley, Chairman of Midas Group, stepped down as Chair of HotSW in 2019 and has now popped up in 2020 as Chair of this Great South West (GSW).

The Great South West prospectus sets out how the area spanning Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, the Heart of the South West (Devon, Plymouth, Somerset and Torbay) and Dorset aims to become the latest growth alliance to rebalance the UK economy, alongside the Midlands Engine and Northern Powerhouse.

On Wednesday, January 22, a delegation comprising business leaders, Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs), MPs and local authorities (Including DCC Leader John Hart) presented Minister for Local Growth, Rt Hon Jake Berry MP, with the GSW growth prospectus and briefed him on ambitions to deliver £45 billion of economic benefit and 190,000 new jobs over the next 15 years.

It seeks support for an enhanced export and investment hub; recognition of a Great South West Tourism Zone and an agreement to create a rural productivity deal.

At HotSW, Hindley oversaw an unrealistic and undeliverable strategy for regional growth aimed at doubling the local economy in 20 years, way ahead of any national performance forecasts, with no clear strategy or feedback mechanism to measure success.

The GSW proposal is more modest. It considers three scenarios: continue growth at 2017 levels; increase to 90% of UK average; matching UK average — nothing about doubling the economy in 20 years. Owl wonders if everyone is singing from the same Hymn sheet.

Owl also wonders why Devon, Cornwall, Somerset and Dorset couldn’t have agreed on forming a single LEP based on the GSW area in the first place, a much more logical arrangement to make the case for infrastructure investment on transport etc .

GSW Prospectus here:

Click to access GSW%20Prospectus%20published%20final%20version%20100120.pdf

NHS leaders urge Government to build 100 new hospitals plus an extra £7Bn/year

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/feb/03/pm-urged-to-give-nhs-100-new-hospitals-plus-an-extra-7bn-a-year?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

NHS leaders have urged Boris Johnson’s government to build 100 new hospitals and give the service an extra £7bn a year for new facilities and equipment.

They want the prime minister to commit to far more than the 40 new hospitals over the next decade that the Conservatives pledged during the general election.

So many hospitals, clinics and mental health units are dilapidated after years of underinvestment in the NHS’s capital budget that a spending splurge on new buildings is needed, bosses say. Too many facilities are cramped and growing numbers are unsafe for patients and staff, they claim.

Johnson has promised £2.7bn to rebuild six existing hospitals and pledged to build 40 in total and upgrade 20 others, although has been criticised for a lack of detail on the latter two pledges.

The call has come from NHS Providers, which represents the bosses of the 240 NHS trusts in England that provide acute, mental health, ambulance and community-based services.

The government needs to match the scale and ambition of the more than 100 new hospitals built between 1997 and 2015 under the controversial private finance initiative, and the 95 created in the first three years of the ”hospital plan” construction programme in the 1960s, they say.

They argue Johnson’s pledges, while welcome, “fall well short of what is needed” across the NHS, and that his planned 40 hospitals represent “a much more modest ambition than what was achieved under those previous initiatives”.

Owl not the only one flying on a wing nd a prayer at the moment!

Flybe’s planes at risk of being impounded as wait for rescue package goes on

It appears Owl is not the only one flying on a wing and a prayer at the moment.

Embattled Flybe is facing a nervous wait over its potential £100m taxpayer loan amid reports that air traffic controllers could impound the regional airline’s planes.

According to mortgage records, many of Flybe’s planes are owned by other firms such as NordLB and Nordic Aviation Capital, who lease them to Flybe to use.

The Sunday Telegraph reported that the firms are monitoring the situation closely. Firms which lease planes to aircrafts are usually allowed to monitor debts owed to air traffic controllers in order to protect their interests.

Debts to air traffic controllers, which could add up to millions of pounds according to one source, must be paid within 30 days.

Last week it was reported that Flybe had been in talks with baggage handlers and other suppliers to postpone the payment of its debts until its rescue package is approved.
The struggling airline has also asked airports to be patient regarding unpaid landing fees.

Last month Flybe staved off collapse after shareholders and the government struck a controversial deal that will review the regional airline’s air passenger duty contributions.

Is something stirring in the undergrowth?

Dear Owl,

Thank you for giving me your blessing. You know how much your 1,000 + followers admired your posts, the research effort that lay behind them and your perspicacity. You are truly irreplaceable but somehow we have to try, your followers can’t endure going cold Turkey any longer.

I will be following your flight path around East Devon, picking over the entrails of what I find and I know that you can always whisper in my ear.

My first post a story about two weeks old but it heralds seismic changes in EDDC and New Owl wants to make sure everyone is up to speed.

https://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/joe-whibley-quits-independent-group-1-6476010

Joe Whibley has become the second Exmouth councillor to leave the controlling group and will now represent the town ward as a non-affiliated independent.

He made the announcement at a meeting of Exmouth Town Council on Monday, January 20.

Following Cllr Paul Millar’s decision to stand down last year, this leaves the independent group with 18 district councillors, one fewer than the Conservative Party.

He said the decision to not give a £2.1 million loan to Seaton Area Health Matters for the purchase of the hospital prompted his departure.

EDDC leader Ben Ingham told the Journal he was ‘puzzled’ by his decision.

Cllr Whibley said: “When elected I stood on a platform of change – an alternative to the status quo.

“I have seen little evidence that this desire is shared by the Independent Group and, to be true to myself and those who put their trust in me, have decided that I can no longer associate myself with them.

“The decision made to effectively vote against saving Seaton Hospital was the final straw.

“I wish all of the Independent Group the very best, and I hope they prove me wrong – the electorate voted for imaginative thinking and a council that would look out for everyone, whatever their situation.”

New Owl was as surprised and disappointed as Old Owl when Ben Ingham took his group of Independents into coalition with the Conservatives after the election last May, then pursued Conservative policies. As Cllr Joe Whibley has said, the electors who voted Independent didn’t vote for the status quo, they voted for change. So it’s not surprising that the wheels of Ben Ingham’s coalition have fallen off after only eight months.

New Owl imagines Ben Ingham is desperately running around trying to make new alliances. Too early to make any predictions but we can all have our hopes. This  is likely to remain a dynamic situation for a while.

This leaves EDDC with the following composition:
19 Conservatives
18 Independent group (Ben Ingham followers)
11 Independent East Devon Alliance
8  Lib Dems
2  Greens
2  Independents (other)

The wait is (nearly) over … a new Owl has flown into East Devon

Just settling in … casting a beady eye around … so much to catch up on … so much to say … so much to hear … so much to do …

feel free to email at

eastdevonwatch@gmail.com

Normal service is about to be resumed …

And already some very juicy meat ready to process …

New Owl has the blessing of Old Owl … keep that content coming Owlets!

Owl’s exit interview …

A sister blog (The People’s Republic of South Devon – PRSD) asked Owl for an exit interview.  Here it is:

The Owl of East Devon Watch has been keeping an eye on the doings in East Devon since 2013, ruffling feathers and shining a light into its murky corners. We caught up with them as they fly the coup

PRSD: What inspired you to start the East Devon Watch?

Owl – East Devon Watch: I had been involved in a very local issue where I lived some years ago. At a meeting where it was discussed, I spoke up. After the meeting, a complete stranger came up to me and said “What we need is a blog about it – I can set it up if you will deal with content”. I knew what a blog was and I had done a bit of professional writing (but not journalism) before, but had never run a blog, so I decided to give it a go. It was tremendously influential and, when the issue was resolved and we no longer needed the blog, I was hooked.

Dealing with the issue brought me up against local councils and local councillors, and I had been unimpressed with them to say the least. I also suspected a good few were, shall we say, not particularly honest! I was appalled that local newspapers were happy not to look under stones or dig deeper, so I decided to change my focus to local politics and politicians.

PRSD: What’s the response been?

Owl – East Devon Watch: Well, that depends on who you are! I was overwhelmed by how popular it became really quickly – I got lots of positive feedback almost immediately. The vast majority of local people were crying out for REAL news about what was REALLY happening in the district, but those who were brought under the spotlight were very upset! Not least the late Councillor Graham Brown, who was exposed for many and various planning conflicts and who had to resign and our MP at the time, Hugo Swire, who hated the blog and insulted it and threatened to sue the person behind it several times! (Swire was recently voted 649th worst constituency MP out of 650). But I was careful to source my information carefully and he never followed through!

PRSD: You’ve been shining a light into the darkest corners of East Devon – what have you found, what’s surprised you and has anything made you smile?

Owl – East Devon Watch: What surprised me was how many people have been prepared to help me to investigate various stories – I had several tip-offs about things going on that councillors and officers were hoping to keep secret but somehow the secrets usually leaked! I built up a large number of “owlets” in the area who have kept me well-fed with juict titbits! I could not have kept going without them.

What has made me smile is knowing when I have hit a chink in some local ne’er-do-well’s armour that has shown them up for what they are – people who have only their own interests or that of their party at heart, not what is best for East Devon. Worthwhile! But there are still too many such charlatans in local politics – in it for gain and/or power, not for greater good.

PRSD: What’s been the most memorable of the stories you’ve covered, and what would you consider to have been successes?

Owl – East Devon Watch: Well, definitely helping to expose Councillor Brown: but it was a much bigger story than one rogue councillor and that wasn’t covered nationally or locally.

It was, in effect, a “shadow (and shadowy) pseudo-council” of high-ranking officers, some high-level councillors with planning interests and big developers – all unaccountably hiding behind a council-run and council-financed “East Devon Business Forum” which was essentially controlling pretty much all the major planning issues in the area – without published agendas or minutes, so initially, in secret. It was having a major effect on the Local Plan without anyone knowing about it. Developers were basically ensuring their sites were included whether suitable or not and with no evidence base for inclusion.

It was Claire Wright, who was then a newly-elected Councillor at East Devon, who took up the task of exposing it at council level and essentially single-handedly brought the situation into the light once the blog (and only the blog) had campaigned on it. Eventually, the council had no option but to disband the Forum and its parallel (also at that time, secret) “working party” at the council and a new, transparent, council-only Local Plan committee had to be set up and the whole Local Plan process had to start all over again after a 2-3 year delay where developers had been given free rein – because there was no Local Plan! So developers were in a win-win situation thanks to the Business Forum!

PRSD: What’s you’re view on informed blogs and websites having a role to play holding power to account?

Owl – East Devon Watch: I think, at the moment, it seems to be ONLY local blogs and websites holding power to account. Local newspapers in East Devon are simply just mouthpieces for (unedited and uninvestigated) council press releases and council dogma statements. The fact that our main local media gets 95% of the council’s lucrative “official notices” revenue doesn’t help! Local newspapers are now pretty much toothless tigers, mostly controlled by national groups with their own (usually Conservative-supporting) agendas. It makes it impossible for them to be investigative journalists – in fact, true investigative journalists are now sadly a dying breed. Blogs have to plug the gaps the shortage leaves.

PRSD: How has the East Devon political landscape changed since you started in 2013?

Owl – East Devon Watch: Enormously. Thanks to the exposing of just how badly the district was being served by its “old-boy, pale, male and stale” developer-led Tories, independent councillors became more and more acceptable, as people could see that austerity (which my council did enthusiastically) was a political choice not a necessity – and it was a choice people didn’t want. For years East Devon boasted about its low council tax with many people unaware that meant loss of vital services. East Devon Alliance returned independent councillors who made a huge difference in their areas, truly representing people not parties.

My big sadness was that, when finally an independent majority DID happen, a number of the new “independent” councillors immediately caused a split into two camps – the new cohort showing its true colours and aligning with the very Conservatives people had elected them to get out! I have nothing but contempt for such people and they were very surprised to find themselves in the spotlight they had thought they would avoid.

Everyone assumed that EDW was simply anti-Tory but it never was – so the “Independent Group”, which aligned with the “old boy, pale, male and stales” got a bit of a shock!

PRSD: You’ve had some focus on planning. It can be a controversial issue. How do you find the current planning situation?

Owl – East Devon Watch: Planning is a minefield, where only developers can avoid the mines. For the individual who wants a small extension or a new garage, they are bogged down in an expensive and bureaucratic process where officers, thin on the ground, have the upper hand and can make them wait and wait for a simple answer, because they are far too busy serving the needs of big developers. For the developer, they VERY much have the upper hand these days (thanks to David Cameron giving them total control of the planning process with no stops when he became coalition PM). They tie planners in knots and eventually pretty much get to build anything they want, anywhere they want. They have the vast wealth to employ the best lawyers to ensure they can game the system and win.

Councillors are just rank amateurs when it comes to complex planning issues and find it hard to say no to officers or developers because it will involve a council in massive expenditure to stand its ground. With little money available, they play it safe and mostly say yes to big developers as they know they have the resources to beat them down.

Officers and developers use highly-questionable statistics to show that development must continue at whatever speed they find gets the developers the biggest profits. It’s a system that is rigged and that will never get the right homes built in the right places. The absence of social housing is a complete disgrace.

Sadly, with the new government I see things getting much worse.

And don’t get me started on “affordable housing’ which has never been affordable!

PRSD: What, if any, plans do you have now?

Owl – East Devon Watch: I’m involved in several things that are nothing to do with councils or politics and I was spreading myself very thinly over everything. Now, I can give those things the time they deserve. And DEFINITELY a holiday!

I couldn’t continue the blog for a district in which most people will not realise they have made some very bad political choices until it is much too late to do anything about them and where the government is going to make councils poorer and even more impotent about anything they disagree with – party whips will reign!

But I much admire PRSD for continuing the battle in its area!

East Devon Watch: Putting chinks in ne'er-do-well's armour