Budleigh parking: a resident’ perspective

According to the Journal EDDC has announced plans to turn the free car park by the Public Hall in Budleigh Salterton to one for permit holders only. If so, this is surely the worst of all outcomes. Not only is the car park no longer free but would only be available to permit holders i.e would exclude visitors and those attending events in the Hall! There is no nearby alternative of this capacity.

The plans were due to be decided on by EDDC’s cabinet on Wednesday — however, there was hope that a last-minute compromise could be found.
Councillor Tom Wright, a member of Budleigh Salterton Town Council and EDDC’s deputy cabinet member for environment, is reported as saying: “We hope that the cabinet will arrive at a compromise which will allow flexible, low cost parking, for residents of Budleigh and our visitors.”. But the Town’s fate may already be sealed.

The saga of the car park began in 2012, when the town council, which had rented the car park for £500 a year, was told EDDC wanted to increase this to £35,000. The town council made a counter offer of £6,500, which was rejected, and heard no more about the matter until now.

An EDDC spokesman said: “Our district-wide car parks review found that it was not reasonable for EDDC to subsidise ‘free’ town centre car parking for just one town in East Devon.

But as Cllr Wright pointed out: “EDDC is trying to say it’s a free car park. It’s not free. The people of Budleigh Salterton have been paying for it through their precept levied by the town council.” (Town ratepayers have been paying for maintenance and no costs fall on other East Devon ratepayers.)

In fact the land was “given” to the people of Budleigh in the shape of the then Urban District Council by Clinton Devon Estates on a peppercorn long lease. Ownership, unfortunately, had to be transferred out of local hands to EDDC when the district council was formed in 1976.

Both the Chamber of Commerce and Budleigh in Business, as well as the Town Council, are opposed to the introduction of charging because of the damage it will do to business and social events such as the series of local festivals.

Wasn’t one of the principles of localism to encourage local communities to make these sorts of decisions to suit local needs? Or are we witnessing another example of “one size fits all” policy making aimed at destroying local identity and creating a degree of conformity that one used to see in the USSR?

Seaside towns like Budleigh and Exmouth have large car parks with good access to the sea but far away from the town centres. They need all the help they can get to encourage visitors into the towns themselves.

Exmouth and Development: an elector’s view

Councillor Tim Wood asks “Why so negative?” in his letter of June 26. Perhaps I can enlighten him, since he is a member of a Tory group which stumbles around in the dark about how to “redevelop” our town.

Rolle is empty. The opportunities to develop it for public use are great, but this is not Tory policy – they want it sold and to reap the income for EDDC coffers.

They must be rubbing their hands with glee at the extra community charge EDDC now gets from all of the halls of residence which have been converted into flats.

Use of the old college library to relocate and expand the existing sounds logical, yet Pauline Stott thinks that Exebank would be a good location! Ridiculous! It is too far from the centre of population.

The Tory group think the rugby ground is perfect for a supermarket to rival Tesco. Ridiculous, it is too far from the centre of population.

Some £450,000 was wasted at the end of Queens Drive, and what for? A flat spiral of paving which leads nowhere. Exactly what has been gained by it?

There are many examples of towns which have bucked the trend of blandness by developing individuality and encouraging small, independent businesses to open. Why can Exmouth not be one of them?

Yes, Mr Wood, there is a lot of negativity about, and the reason lies with your blinkered approach to “development”.

Nick Crane did a series on BBC2 called Town and it showed how towns could evolve in the 21st century.

I emailed Councillor Diviani and the other movers and shakers in EDDC over a year ago, and not one of them was polite enough to respond. Too busy sitting around a table no doubt, blue sky thinking!

Take off your blinkers and look around, and encourage your fellow councillors to do the same. We do not want what a Tory EDDC is offering, or what it has already given us!

Mike Fairclough

http://www.devon24.co.uk/news/take_a_look_tim_1_3666667

It’s official: MILLIONS of missing voters is an omnishambles of the first order

In fact, as I write, there is a Parliamentary Select Committee grilling the Electoral Commission on Voter Engagement in the UK – MILLIONS of voters appear to have been missed due to changes being made to how voters are registered – how convenient as many of these voters will be those who might vote for minority parties and it could drastically affect the results of the next General Election.

Write to Chris Ruane, MP  for Vale of Clwyd, if you want to tell this commission what you think – he’s the MP who seems to have a total grip on exactly what a scandal this is.

Currently they are talking about the performance of Electoral Registration Officers.

Fabian Hamilton, MP for Leeds North is also asking some very pertinent questions on this aspect of the scandal.  Apparently, it is the responsibility of EROs to arrange house to house visits and some 6% of local authorities are not doing this as some lack skills and capacity and because they don’t understand the law!   They are even talking about a “special measures” scenario for such situations …

http://www.chrisruane.org/

http://www.leedsne.co.uk/contact_information

There is a way(apparently) of highlighting where Electoral Registration Officers are underperforming!

They are also covering electoral fraud:  30% of people believe that fraud is taking place.  Phil Thompson, Research and Evaluation Manager of the Electoral Commission says it is hard to find the true figure … er, but that’s his job!  There are 16 local authorities which are “at risk” and most likely to happen at local government elections usually in specific wards.

Hello, EDDC Electoral Registration Officer (Mark Williams, solicitor and CEO?).

 

“NPPF fails to make a significant impact” on the percentage of planning permissions granted in the last two years

The National Planning Policy Framework has “failed to make a significant impact” on the percentage of planning permissions granted by local authorities in the two years since its introduction, according to new research.

Analysis of more than 1.7m planning applications and 16,000 appeals over four years by planning consultancy Turley shows approvals and rejections have remained broadly the same at 80 per cent and 20 per cent.  There has, however, been a significant increase in the success of some types of planning appeals, with rates for public inquiries climbing by as much as 50 per cent since the introduction of the NPPF.  There has only been a modest increase in successful appeals by hearing and no change in those through written representations.

Rob Peters, executive director at Turley, said: “There are a range of factors that can influence planning outcomes and the decision to approve or refuse applications is not solely related to national policy. However, it is a reasonable assumption that the combination of less guidance and a strong presumption in favour of sustainable development would result in more planning applications being approved.  This has not been the case.”

He added that the variations in the success of different forms of planning appeals could be partly explained by “the failure of local authorities to formulate and adopt local plans to the timescale envisaged in the NPPF”.  “To date, the Planning Inspectorate reports that just 14.6 per cent of development plans have been found sound and adopted since the NPPF was published,” Peters said.

“Given the importance of having an up-to-date local plan, especially one that deals with an area’s objectively assessed housing needs and the duty to cooperate with adjoining authorities, it is perhaps not surprising that major residential schemes are enjoying greater success at appeal.”

http://www.localgovernmentexecutive.co.uk/news/nppf-has-little-impact-planning-approvals

So, one has to ask, what was the NPPF actually FOR and how come it has made a very significant impact in East Devon yet not elsewhere.

Now, that reminds us – the East Devon Business Forum Task and Finish Group …

Beavers on the River Otter – will the public be able to have its say?

Beavers are a native species, hunted to extinction 500 years ago. Re-introductory trials (at some expense) are taking place in Scotland but it seems that Nature is taking is taking her own course here in the river Otter.

beaver 2014 mod

The photo above was taken very recently in Otterton. Defra, whose first response to most problems seems to be to cull, wants to get rid of them.

Devon-based wildlife consultant Derek Gow, who was responsible for three imported beavers destined for an animal sanctuary in Scotland, is a long-standing campaigner for the animals to be returned to the wild. He is reported as saying: “At the moment they [Defra] are ringing all the zoos and asking them if they will take the beavers. “What Defra should do is look at a more informative project where by the beavers are left and studied – it becomes an English beaver trial.”

He blamed angling groups for demanding the beavers be removed [beavers are vegetarian]. “Why should three beavers be three beavers too many?,” he said. “This will be the first time in history that we have exterminated a native mammal twice, setting an extraordinary historical precedent”.

Only recently have Otters returned to the lower Otter. The water vole has been in decline nationally attributed partly to the American mink, an aggressive predator of the vole, together with unsympathetic farming and watercourse management which destroyed parts of the water vole’s habitat. The water vole, an important indicator of a healthy environment, has not yet returned to the lower Otter.

American mink are a non-native, carnivore species, introduced to Devon so that they could be farmed for their fur. Over the years escapees have naturalised and there are still mink in the Otter. EDDC Countryside Service monitored the mink rafts in the Otter, owned by Clinton Devon Estate, for many years because of the threat that they posed, but this has now stopped due to budget cuts. The Axe, which belongs to EDDC, has priority for funding and monitoring continues there.

Some believe that beavers make a positive contribution to flood prevention and river quality. With the Environment Agency expressing concern over the bathing water quality in Budleigh Salterton, and flooding a well-known vexation, one wonders whether we have got our priorities right.

More information, including reference to two “save the beaver” on line petitions, can be found here:
http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/petitions-Devon-beavers-remain-large/story-21312530-detail/story.html#comments
http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/beavers_found_living_wild_in_devon_countryside_to_be_sent_to_the_zoo

Another major threat to tourism in Budleigh: water quality

From an article in today’s Budleigh Journal it is clear that the Environment Agency (EA) believes that Budleigh beach will be among the ten or so beaches in Devon, out of nearly two hundred, likely to fail to meet the more stringent bathing water quality standards being introduced next year. If it is, then there will have to be “no swimming” signs posted along the sea front with devastating implications to tourism. Add to that the strong possibility of the free parking being withdrawn (see below) and Budleigh could be in real trouble.

It appears that water quality was excellent until about 2010 when something changed. Extensive monitoring of the beach and all the rivers and brooks that empty into the sea at Budleigh is ongoing.

What on earth could have changed in five years?

Knowle village green application rejected – removal vans booked?

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/news/breaking_knowle_village_green_status_bid_rejected_1_3668298

Missing voters – a Freedom of Information request

Good to see that one of our readers has put in a Freedom of Information request to East Devon District Council about the missing 6,000 plus voters missing from the electoral roll:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/electoral_role

More than 700 homes now built in Cranbrook – are their residents on the electoral roll?

From an article about Cranbrook in the Mid Devon Star:

… “It is exactly two years since the first turf was cut on site at Cranbrook and in Phase One of the town there are now over 700 completed homes, 276 children in the first primary school, a half hourly bus service and a well-used community centre.”

One wonders if all these residents are reflected in the electoral roll.

This statement comes from an article in which EDDC Councillor Andrew Moulding boasts about how many of Cranbrook’s properties have been bought under the Help to Buy schemes. However, he neglects to inform us how these purchasers will fare if there is an interest rate rise.

Phase Two of Cranbrook will see a further 2,380 homes being built.

http://www.middevonstar.co.uk/news/11311564.Cranbrook_is__Help_to_Buy__hotspot/