Welcome to Elysium …

“Elysium: a place or state of perfect happiness”

EDDC’s Annual Report for 2014/15 is now out:

(http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/1316010/annual-report-2014-15-website.pdf)

and those reading it might be forgiven for thinking that the opening letter of the acronym stands for Elysium as opposed to East. Because everything in East Devon is, if the report is to be believed, Absolutely Fabulous.

One doesn’t expect reports of this kind to be brutally truthful. But one is entitled to expect some degree of modesty and acknowledgement that life is not all a bed of roses. Not however if you are Cllr Diviani: “this annual report is an opportunity to pause and reflect on our successes over the past 12 months before we look forward … to … the next four years”. It’s an opportunity also, of course, to reflect on abject failures. To have seen some references to ‘challenges’ might have been a bit more honest, Cllr Diviani.

The report reveals that more than half of respondents don’t think EDDC is doing a good job delivering jobs in the west of the district or making towns better places to live. Still, never mind, notwithstanding the grumpy 12,000 people who signed a petition against the demolition of Elizabeth Hall in Exmouth – no fewer than 44 jobs were created when Premier Inn bulldozed the site and put up a hotel! (In fact the creation of these 44 jobs is such an achievement that a photo of the opening of the Premier Inn takes up half of page 12 of the Report.)

But the best spin of all is to read that in 2014/15 EDDC received a record number of planning applications (1,221), and the record number of appeals received (74) constituted a 77% success rate. Good news? Only up to a point. Had EDDC got its act together and a Local Plan in place, taxpayers’ money wouldn’t have been wasted receiving so many applications, and defending so many appeals, in the first place.

As it is, the only mention of the Local Plan in the report is confined to a single sentence, conveying the impression that its progression to a “second round of hearing sessions” is perfectly normal, and that its likely adoption in late 2015/early 2016 and is not years and years behind schedule, as the savvier voters know only too well.

Cranbrook: is the current town centre actually one of its projected suburbs?

intriguing post on a Cranbrook forum:

” … have been through phase 3 a couple of times lately and am getting very confused about where the “town centre” and “high street” are going to be. As we are going to be the size of Honiton I was anticipating that number of shops, restaurants, pubs and other services. Am going to chat to the growth point people next week, but in the meantime, I checked out the Growth Point’s website. Should I be worried that the page for the town centre no longer exists?!….. http://www.exeterandeastdevon.gov.uk/cranbrook-town-centre/

Fantasy v. reality and localism v. centralism in housing supply

    And not a mention of the bigger problems – land banking, lack of infrastructure and no incentives to build affordable properties – in either article!

    Report calls for local authorities to be cut out of housing projects

    With just 117,720 homes built last year, a new report from planning consultancy Quod [and coincidentally appointed by Brandon Lewis below, to speed up planning permissions] and lawyers Bond Dickinson suggests that the housing shortage has become so severe that building projects should be considered by central government rather than by local authorities. It argues that housebuilding should be brought into the nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIP) regime, thus allowing developers to apply directly to the government for planning permission, bypassing local authority planning regulations.

    “Local housing plans are being held up either because it’s a difficult decision for local authorities to take, or two or three local authorities can’t agree between themselves, or the local inspectorate is pushing back. So it’s taking a long time for those local plans to come through, and there’s no guarantee that will change. There are no perfect solutions to delivering large-scale housing development, but the NSIP regime looks to be an attractive option, and we urge the government to consult on its usage as a matter of urgency,”

    Kevin Gibbs a partner at Bond Dickinson explains.
    The Times, Page: 45

    and

    “Lewis hopes for 1m new homes by end of Parliament

    Brandon Lewis, the housing minister, has said in a BBC documentary that he hopes to see 1m new homes built by the end of this Parliament. Gavin Smart, deputy chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Housing, said: “Matching the ambition with successful delivery would be a great achievement.”

    However, Professor Tony Crook, of the University of Sheffield, commented: “It would certainly be a significant target, but a lot of people would argue it’s not enough.” He added that private sector builders would only be able to deliver 150,000 a year by themselves, and said the Government must do more to support building by other sectors if it is to meet the target.

    The BBC Inside Out documentary was aired last night on BBC1 at 7.30pm and is available on BBC

Remaining Knowle parkland to be sold to Sidmouth Town Council for £1

All well and good talking about restrictive covenants but they were not much use in Exmouth when East Devon District Council bought out restrictive covenants which were owned by Clinton Devon Estates which would have held up developments.

And if some parkland is used for parking as mentioned in the article, what is to stop Pegasus using it as an overflow car park for their luxury retirement complex?

Many questions still to be answered.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/covenant_to_protect_future_of_knowle_park_1_4238238

North Devon GPs powerfully challenge the closure of community beds

Our thanks to the blog of Claire Wright for this post from North Devon GPs to the Commissioning Group which has already closed community beds in our area –

Dear Dr Diamond,

‘Safe and effective care within the budget’ consultation

We, the undersigned GPs, would like to register our grave concerns over patient safety regarding the forthcoming plans of Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust (NDHT) to close community beds, either in totality or part of the locality, in an unprecedented move before this coming winter as proposed in your current consultation paper.

The current consultation process for “safe and effective care within the budget” has been experienced as a hasty cost improvement process given the far-reaching safety implications of the proposed changes. Whilst we recognise the current context of austerity, we are concerned that the untried, untested closures of so many community hospital beds in this area could prove dangerous for a significant population of patients who might need to rely on community beds to bridge the gap between acute hospital care and their homes when they become severely ill this winter.

The population in North Devon is 166,093 with 1555 people living in residential care homes. There are 4 community hospitals in Holsworthy, Bideford, South Molton and Ilfracombe which has 10 community beds but is temporarily closed. The current 64 beds in 3 community hospitals are fully occupied. East of the Water near Bideford and Ilfracombe are among the most deprived areas in the country with complex health and social needs. Patients in our rural areas will have more difficulties in getting transport to North Devon District Hospital (NDDH) in Barnstaple should all the community hospital beds be closed. Patients in Holsworthy areas will have to travel 35 miles to NDDH should Holsworthy community hospital be closed.

We have particular concerns over the safety of these proposals that are being made in the absence of concrete plans for bolstering and investing in safe staffing levels of the existing very stretched community nursing service. Vulnerable patients this winter could find themselves with inadequate community nursing, physiotherapy and other ancillary services, as well as an over-stretched primary care GP services which will be forced into taking clinical responsibility in an inadequate and under- resourced system. The current time-frame does not suggest any contingency or risk and impact assessment to account for laying down sufficient and timely investment in community services and staff to prevent this.

It must be recognised that North Devon District Hospital (NDDH) currently faces frequent bed shortages, resulting with patients at times having to be placed temporarily in the day surgery unit overnight in bed state emergencies with inadequate facilities as in a normal ward and delayed admissions. Closing community hospitals beds will further compound this situation and may also affect the safe running of NDDH itself.

NEW Devon CCG’s suggested strategic direction is for a timely process of reduction in the numbers of community beds shared over a number of community hospital sites, with money saved by reduction of community beds reinvested in community staffing. This is a very different proposal.

If staff cannot be attracted to work at the community hospitals, it is unlikely they will be recruited in a timely manner to provide sufficient community nursing cover to the local population, resulting in unsafe levels of staff to cover patients discharged from NDDH in the community, often very early in the course of their illness with multiple needs, both medical and social.

Similarly, we are not convinced by the proposal of a community bed unit based at NDDH to be established in time for the winter prior to the closure of all community hospital beds, nor the proposal that a “Frailty Consultant” will be recruited in time to provide clinical guidance and leadership to those proposed beds at NDDH reserved for community patients. NDHT has had severe difficulties and is unable despite multiple advertisements in replacing recently resigned Care of Older People Consultants. North Devon population will end up with no community hospital beds, no consultant with the appropriate skills to provide clinical skills and direction and an over-stretched community service in addition to an acute hospital with bed shortages over the winter.

It has been suggested that the closure of Torrington Community hospital was a success. The truth of the matter is that these patients were often placed in other community hospitals which are still open and evidence shows these community beds are needed.

We agree that patient safety is paramount and as such we do not support the current “safe effective care within budget” plans and their time-frame. We propose NDHT engage all stakeholders including the CCG and staff for a timely and proper consultation to find the best and safe solution for our population.

Yours sincerely

Dr Glenys Knight, Senior Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Mark Clayton, GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Geoff Spencer, GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Duncan Bardner, GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Alison Stapley, Executive & GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Yuk Chan, GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Ed Bond, GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Ruth Down, GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Richard Davies, GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Andrew Clarke, GP Partner, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Sarah Ansell, Salaried GP, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Nicky Relph, Salaried GP, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Steffan James, ST4, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Fiona Duncan, ST3, Bideford Medical Centre
Dr Alan Howlett, Senior Partner, Black Torrington Health Centre
Dr David Hillebrandt, semi-retired Holsworthy GP, Sessional and OOH GP
Dr Birgit Hole, Sessional GP
Dr Caroline Flynn, Session GP
Dr Chris Gibb, Senior Partner, South Molton Health Centre
Dr Justin Bowyer, GP Partner, South Molton Health Centre
Dr Rebecca Geary, GP Partner, South Molton Health Centre
Dr Wayne Sturley, GP Partner, South Molton Health Centre

Colyton: where a committee chair is elected before the comittee is chosen!

Queer goings-on in Colyton where the first public meeting to discuss developing a Neighbourhood Plan descender into chaos and must at times seemed like an episode of “Yes, Minister”.

According to the “View from Colyton” (see digital edition online) the first public meeting – where it was anticipated that people would be informed and a committee chosen – were told that the-committee-that-didn’t-yet-exist would be chaired by Parish Councillor Caroline Collier, who had been elected, in advance of the committee being constituted, by the parish council at an earlier meeting.

This news was met with cries of “Undemocratic” and with council Chairman Andrew Parr telling people “It’s the parish council’s committee” whereas, apparently, others in the room thought that the clue was in the name – and that the neighbourhood would be in charge – once a committee was constituted!

Mr Parr (husband of EDDC councillor Helen Parr) and Mrs Collier have been very, very long-standing members of the Parish Council.

It also transpired during the meeting that Mrs Parr, in 2011, had said that the area did not need a Neighbourhood Plan as the then (and still) emerging Local Plan would suffice. Her response when this was pointed out was “That was then and this is now”!

Many Neighbourhood Plan committees have few or no councillors on them so that the process can be seen to be fully inclusive and not responding to the wishes of one particular group and many are chaired by local people with no council background.

The need for Colyton Parish Council to own the process does not auger well for others who may have different views on development in the area, particularly when some councillors may also be Feoffeex and/or landowners and developers.