Beer: officers recommend refusal of Clinton Devon estates development in AONB

So, Councillor Pook and Clinton Devon Estates v. a very persuasive argument from Officers then … which way will the DMC fall?

The proposals will go before East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) development management committee on Tuesday. Planning officers have told members that the development could be ‘harmful’ to the village’s landscape, due to its location in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). They also say the proposal does not meet EDDC’s criteria for ‘exception’ sites outside the built-up area boundaries of villages, as it is too large. In a report to the committee, an officer said: “Given the harm to the character of Beer and harm to the AONB from further development, and given the difficulty in finding suitable development sites to meet the housing need, consideration has to be given to whether the affordable housing needs for Beer need to be met elsewhere, for example within Seaton, that is in close proximity.”

The application has received backing from the parish council and Beer’s district council ward member to help secure ‘affordable’ housing for people with a connection to Beer. Councillor Geoff Pook, ward member for Beer and Branscombe, said: “The one common issue has been the need to secure affordable housing for people with connections to Beer. More local children going to the school, less than 100 metres from the houses, will eliminate the ‘school drop-off’ car use required for children outside the local area. Beer has a good community spirit and the increase in full-time residents contributing to the shops, clubs, and general village life can only be positive.”

One thought on “Beer: officers recommend refusal of Clinton Devon estates development in AONB

  1. Dear Sirs, Ref Planning application 14/2621/mout. I hope someone has noted that a previous planning application for 1 property to be built in the grounds of Sugar Hill with access on to the same road in the same place as the proposed 30 houses application was denied due to dangerous access. This I state again was for just 1 house with possibly 2 cars. The application for 30 houses would be looking at around 60 cars negotiating this very dangerous stretch of road with blind corners within 150 meters at both ends. Obviously the threat to Beer/Seaton mergence as this is the last green field site between the two areas is obvious but presumably needs to be pointed out again.

    Regards J Sing


Comments are closed.