Oh no, now RUSSIA wants a piece of our nuclear action!

Why on earth can’t we do stuff OURSELVES – once upon a time we exported our expertise around the world!

A Russian nuclear group is hoping that the potential meltdown of French plans to build new European pressurised reactors at Hinkley Point could offer an opportunity to break into the British nuclear market.

Deeper concerns about the future of the Somerset scheme were raised by the French energy minister, Ségolène Royal, who warned of the “colossal” cost, which EDF admitted could be £18bn or even £21bn.

Recent talks have been held between state-owned Russian nuclear group Rosatom and the UK’s Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) despite the chilly political relations between London and Moscow over Ukraine, Moscow sources claimed.”

http://gu.com/p/4j7vg?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Ottery St Mary farm for sale with agricultural tie – or is it?

Former East Devon District Councillor Graham Brown’s home was apparently briefly on the market this week. The home, with its agricultural tenancy, was advertised as up for sale for £1 million plus. Here is where it appeared in a local newspaper on 11 May 2016:

image

However, if you are interested in buying it, that may prove to be a little difficult, as it does not appear on the Symonds and Sampson estate agent website, nor on either of the major property websites Rightmove and Zoopla and Google searching does not bring it up.

Ex-councillor Brown attempted to remove the agricultural tie a year or two ago saying that he had not farmed the land for many years, but his application was refused after EDDC received evidence that the land had been receiving EU farming subsidies.

Removal of an agricultural tie can add at least 40% to the value of a property.

There are companies that will work on a “no win, no fee” basis specialising in removing such ties, but rules say that the property should be marketed first with its tie for a reasonable price and continuously for a reasonable period of time, usually at least six months.

As it seems to have been marketed only for a very short period before disappearing completely from the internet, it seems that the owner must have decided to stay put or perhaps he has decided to change estate agents and to market it again later.

Update: The property was on offer in March 2013 for £1.55M via Hall and Scott. See

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-41090060.html

Note that at the time the spec was for approx 25 acres — but now it’s being advertised at 22 [sic] acres – and that it was clear that “Ware Farm is subject of an Agricultural Tie”.

Self-evidently if that tie were lifted, the owner should expect to get substantially more than the £1.55M asking price of three years ago. That wouldbe a nice little earner.

Claims that Chinese Government has secret plans if EDF do not build Hinkley C

“The Chinese government has secret plans to build two nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point if a joint deal for a new nuclear power station with French company EDF falls through, it has been claimed.

Lord Howell of Guildford, George Osborne’s father-in-law, told the House of Lords that the Chinese were actively discussing a ‘plan B’ if the existing £21 billion plan fails.

Addressing a fellow peer, Lord Howell, the Conservative energy secretary under Margaret Thatcher, said: ‘Is my noble friend aware that the Chinese also have a plan B, which is to bypass EDF altogether and to build two smaller reactors on the Hinkley C site, and to do it rather quicker than the present Hinkley C plans?’

He later told The Times that he had previously had private meetings with Chinese delegations, and said: ‘This is the view of informed think tanks and a deduction of the way they must be thinking.’

His warning will put greater pressure on the Hinkley C project, which is planned to provide about seven per cent of the country’s electricity.
Yesterday, EDF announced a 16 per cent increase on the cost of the project since October, from £18 billion to £21 billion.

The French energy giant also admitted that the project would not be finished before 2027, which is a decade later than was originally proposed.

There have been repeated delays with designing and construction of the plant, which will take at least nine and a half years to build once it has been signed off. This is not now due to happen until September.

Lord Howell suggested that the second plan would involve building two smaller nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point ‘rather quicker’.

Senior intelligence and military figures warned that national security could be threatened by Chinese nuclear reactors after fears that technological ‘trapdoors or backdoors’ might be put into computer systems. This would allow China to bypass Britain’s security measures.

Lisa Nandy, the shadow energy secretary, told The Times: ‘If there is a secret Chinese plan B for Hinkley, ministers should tell us precisely what that is.

‘With uncertainty over both the timetable and the cost of this project, it is now imperative that the government offer reassurance that British jobs will be protected, costs on households will be kept under control and that binding pollution targets will not be put at risk.’

A Department of Energy spokesman said: ‘There is no proposal for the Chinese to build a reactor at Hinkley.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3588179/China-s-secret-plan-build-two-Hinkley-reactors-joint-deal-EDF-falls-through.html

change.org petition started for Alison Hernandez to stand down

“Alison Hernandez, Police and Crime Commissioner for Devon and Cornwall, should stand down.”

https://www.change.org/p/opcc-devonandcornwall-pnn-police-uk-alison-hernandez-police-and-crime-commissioner-for-devon-and-cornwall-should-stand-down

“Gentrification of the countryside”

A court decision to uphold controversial Government reforms to affordable housing laws will result in further “gentrification” of the countryside, rural campaigners have warned.

Anita Grice, director of the Campaign to Protect Rural England in Cornwall, said the ruling on changes to Section 106 agreements will hit communities in the South West “hard”.

While North Devon councillor Brian Greenslade has warned it will push younger families out of the countryside, putting the future of rural schools at risk.

Ministers confirmed on Wednesday that plans to exempt small-scale developments from section 106 affordable housing obligations had been restored by the Court of Appeal.

The decision followed a lengthy court battle, which initially saw the Government policy overturned.

This latest move has been welcomed by construction firms, who claim the changes will make smaller, more sustainable housing projects financially viable.

Brian Berry, chief executive of the Federation of Master Builders, said the new system will lift “serious barriers” for small and medium sized firms to deliver much needed housing.

campaigners argue that these small-scale projects – defined as five or less properties in rural areas – are a crucial source of affordable housing in the countryside.

Ms Grice said the availability of affordable stock in areas like Devon and Cornwall is already “dire” and the new ruling “will make it even worse”.

“It means that local authorities will have less say on the type of housing that gets built and affordable housing provision in our market towns and villages will become even more squeezed,” she said.

“Less provision means that many local people will find it difficult, if not impossible, to remain in areas where they have community ties.

“Instead we will see more housing built for the open market – and this will contribute to the ever-increasing gentrification of our countryside.”

Shadow Lib Dem leader cllr Greenslade added: “If local planning authorities cannot condition for some affordable housing in rural communities then younger families will decamp to larger urban areas. Such depopulation of younger families will threaten the future of small schools for example.

Taking this together with the Tories voting down the wholly sensible amendments put forward in the Lords in respect of the Housing and Planning Bill… the Government has dealt a hammer blow to the housing aspirations of many local young people.”

The Department for Communities and Local Government said the ruling “restores common sense to the system” and will encourage new developments.

Housing minister Brandon Lewis said: “This will now mean that builders developing sites of fewer than 10 homes will no longer have to make an affordable homes contribution that should instead fall to those building much larger developments.”

How the Section 106 row developed:

March 2014: The Government published a consultation proposing to scrap section 106 obligations on the provision of affordable homes for developments of 10 properties or less (5 or less in rural areas)

Rural campaigners quickly responded with warnings about the impact on affordable housing supply in rural communities

November 2014: the policy is adopted

May 2015: West Berkshire Council and Reading Borough Council launch a legal challenge against the reforms, arguing that the consultation process had been unlawful

July 2015: Justice Holgate quashes the Government policy, describing it as “unlawful” and “unfair”

The Government announces it will appeal the ruling

May 11 2016: The Court of Appeal rules in favour of the Government, restoring its changes to the section 106 regulations.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Court-ruling-housing-reforms-means-gentrification/story-29265763-detail/story.html

“Campaigners challenge Government to fulfil its pledge to strengthen neighbourhood planning”


“Campaigners are urging Government to back up its pledge to give added strength to neighbourhood planning, following a debate on the Housing and Planning Bill on Monday (9 May)

Planning minister Brandon Lewis once again rejected a Lords amendment tabled by Baroness Parminter to enable communities with a complete or emerging neighbourhood plan to appeal against decisions that conflicted with that plan. Citing his opposition to extending third party rights in the planning system, Mr Lewis achieved parliamentary support to reinstate the Government’s own amendment to support neighbourhood planning: a clause to ensure complete plans are referred to in decisions.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), Civic Voice and the National Association of Local Councils (NALC) are disappointed that the Government has established a clause that adds nothing to standard practice, but are heartened by Mr Lewis’s pledge to ‘work with colleagues to ensure that neighbourhood plans enjoy the primacy that we intend them to have in planning law’.

The groups believe that ministers can and should work with supportive Conservative MPs, such as Nick Herbert, and supportive peers to give greater weight to neighbourhood planning [1]. The groups argue that the secretary of state should incorporate the principles of a ‘neighbourhood right to be heard’, as also tabled (and subsequently withdrawn) by Baroness Parminter on Tuesday (10 May), into secondary legislation or existing planning policy. These principles could include:

a duty to have special regard to made or emerging neighbourhood development plans;
a duty to meaningfully consult the neighbourhood planning body and take account of that body’s recommendations; and
guidance on and power to call-in decisions that do not accord with the plan [2]
Neighbourhood plans represent local aspirations and have been shown to increase the number of homes planned locally [3]. The House of Lords twice voted to introduce Baroness Parminter’s amendment establishing a neighbourhood right of appeal, and the Government twice rejected it.

It has been argued by many, including some MPs, that the Government’s amendment in lieu ‘does not go far enough’ beyond existing good practice in supporting neighbourhood planning.

Sarah James, head of policy, Civic Voice, said:

“Neighbourhood plans are undermined by speculative developments, so we need a mechanism to ensure that those neighbourhood plans, once agreed or when close to agreement, are not subverted.

“Civic Voice wants to see a plan-led system, but where an application departs from a plan, the community should have the right to challenge. We will continue to campaign on this important civic movement issue”.

Matt Thomson, head of planning at CPRE, said:

“While the Government’s amendment will reduce the scope of neighbourhood plans, and thereby the confidence of communities in them, we are pleased that the minister will explore further ways to empower local people.

“Lords and MPs have done a vital job in bringing attention to this issue. It is now up to Government to prove their commitment to neighbourhood plans and afford them more weight when crucial decisions are made.”

Councillor Ken Browse, chairman, National Association of Local Councils (NALC), said:

“Neighbourhood planning is undoubtedly a positive step forward in placing more power over development in the hands of local people, but it is imperative the hard work of parish and town councils, working with their communities, and the integrity of neighbourhood plans, are not undermined.

“I look forward to working with the government and others to strengthen neighbourhood planning to ensure communities really are in the driving seat of how their places grow and develop.”