An interesting Freedom of Information request

Cost of using external law firms and barristers

Date submitted: 24 May 2016

Summary of request

I would like to know the amount of money the council spent on the services of external law firms and barristers over each of the last two years (years ending March 31 2015 and March 31 2016).

Summary of response

External spend on legal fees, including barristers for 2014/2015 = £353,060.78

External spend on legal fees, including barristers for 2015/2016 = £79,053.34

Date responded: 14 June 2016

Just a bit of a jump – and all of it OUR money

Friends of the Earth planning event in Exeter of particular interest to coastal communities

Please advertise this event as widely as possible, particularly to coastal communities – it appears to be free but tickets need to be reserved in advance:

“This is a 3-hour (from 6.30 to 9.30) evening skill-share and Power Up! session designed to better equip you to navigate and influence your local planning and development system – with a focus on coastal towns and communities. The intended outcome of this session is that you will be able to better protect your local communities against unwanted development that will cause environmental and social degredation.

We hope that this event can bring together groups and individuals from the surrounding areas who are either engaged in some way or another with planning concerns or who would like to be.

The evening will be hosted and facilitated by Naomi Luhde-Thompson, Friends of the Earth’s planning specialist.

We look forward to seeing you on the evening of Friday the 7th October!

Please share this with others in your local community you would like to come: https://www.facebook.com/events/152782855158372/

WHEN
Friday, 7 October 2016 from 18:30 to 21:30 (BST)
WHERE
Exeter Community Centre – 17 Saint Davids Hill, Exeter, EX4 3RG

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/friends-of-the-earth-planning-power-up-exeter-tickets-27045439638?invite=&err=29&referrer=&discount=&affiliate=&eventpassword=

PegasusLife – new and bigger plans for Knowle

Revised plans = new consultation?

“Pegasus Life’s latest revised plans for Knowle now submitted.

A string of Pegasus Life’s revised plans and statements for the Knowle, have just been uploaded (10th Aug) to the EDDC Planning portal.

To view, go to https://planning.eastdevon.gov.uk/online-applications/, type in reference 16/0872/MFUL, and search Documents.

Have all the many issues*, not least size, scale and suitability of design, now been addressed?

For two examples of the latter, submitted yesterday, see Document 239415, pages 11-14, showing impact from the south park, and Document 2391414, pages 20-22, impact on upper Knowle Drive.

See information in earlier posts:

*https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/06/15/knowle-planning-application-breaks-a-raft-of-local-plan-rules-says-vgs/
*https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/06/13/knowle-drive-after-pegasus-life-plans-a-question-of-perspective/
*https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/05/30/throwing-away-our-heritage-london-based-save-vehemently-objects-to-plans-for-knowle/

https://saveoursidmouth.com/2016/08/11/pegasus-lifes-latest-revised-plans-for-knowle-now-submitted/

“Nuclear espionage charge for China firm with one-third stake in UK’s Hinkley Point”

Oh dear.

The Chinese company with a major stake in the proposed Hinkley Point C nuclear power station has been charged by the US government over nuclear espionage, according to the US justice department.

In a 17-page indictment, the US government said nuclear engineer Allen Ho, employed by the China General Nuclear Power Company, and the company itself had unlawfully conspired to develop nuclear material in China without US approval and “with the intent to secure an advantage to the People’s Republic of China”.

CGNPC has a 33% stake in the £18bn Hinkley Point project in Somerset, which Theresa May has delayed partly because of concerns over China’s involvement. The delay prompted a warning earlier this week from the Chinese ambassador to the UK, who said that relations between the two countries are at a “crucial historical juncture”. …”

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/aug/11/nuclear-espionage-charge-for-china-firm-with-one-third-stake-in-hinkley-point?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

“Greater Exeter” moves on apace – and Greater Plymouth

Local Government is in a particularly fluid and unstable situation at the moment. Brexit is ripping many plans and budgets wide apart, particularly where Local Enterprise Partnerships and local councils were relying heavily on EU funding or EU-based projects, such as Hinkley C.

There have been hints that the new government is not enamoured of some of the devolution bids and that unitary councils (which would see the demise of district councils) may now be back on the table.

Plymouth, the South Hams and West Devon also seem to be working towards a “Greater Plymouth”:

Click to access 201606The_Plymouth_and_South_West_Devon_Joint_Local_Plan_Newsletter_PDF.pdf

Are we seeing the first signs of an anti-unitary move that would allow our two cities to work autonomously rather than Devon-wide? Is it an insurance policy against the increasing powers being grabbed by our LEP?

Whatever it is – it is being done yet again with no consultation and meetings behind closed doors.

Owl wonders what Mrs May thinks of these legacies of Mr Cameron and, more specifically, Mr Osborne.

Here is an up-to-date post on moves towards a “Greater Exeter”:

In a previous post

Whose Vision is it anyway? Part 1

I highlighted the flamboyantly named Greater Exeter Visioning Board, announced with a fanfare of trumpets and then shifted off into the dark shadows of proceedings held behind firmly closed doors. This post reports the uncomfortable outcome of my further investigations.

Having been told by Exeter City Council that the minutes of the Visioning Board were not made public, I asked some more questions. The City Council’s answers are below.

Q1: Under what authority the board was established and who agreed its terms of reference?

A1: A Memorandum of Understanding was agreed by the Leaders and Chief Executives of Exeter City Council, East Devon District Council and Teignbridge District Council in November 2014. The Memorandum of Understanding is not a legally binding document but all parties use all reasonable endeavours to comply with the terms and spirit of the Memorandum of Understanding.

Q2: The reasons for its decision not to publish agendas and minutes?

A2: Many of the issues that are discussed at the Board relate to the growth of the Greater Exeter area. It is considered that the board needs to be able to have open discussions through which they can develop ideas, debate live issues and reach decisions. Disclosure of these discussions may inhibit the imparting or commissioning of advice, or the offering or requesting of opinions for consideration.

Q3: Whether it reports its proceedings to councillors and, if so, what opportunities are open to councillors to scrutinise its work?

A3: Council Leaders and Deputy Leaders from each of the three authorities sit on the board.

Q4: If it does not report its proceedings to councillors, to whom is the board accountable?

So what’s next?

We can at least now speculate what the Visioning Board was up to. On 12 July, the City Council’s Executive (the lead councillors) discussed a report by the Assistant Director City Development which set out proposals for establishing:

“a joint strategic plan for the Greater Exeter area which would be prepared in partnership between East Devon District Council, Exeter City Council, Mid Devon District Council and Teignbridge District Council with assistance from Devon County Council. The plan would cover the geographical area of the 4 partner authorities (excluding the area of Dartmoor National Park) but would be limited in scope to cover strategic issues and strategic allocations within those areas with local issues to be considered through linked local plans prepared by each partner authority for their area.” [1]

This was nodded through and then approved by the full Council on 26 July.

In a future post I will explore the challenges for serious public engagement presented by this form of joint working. For the moment, let’s just say that the gestation of this proposal behind closed doors, and the underlying assumption that joint planning is a technocratic issue rather than something which asks the communities what sort of Greater Exeter we want (if indeed we want one at all) does not augur well.

Or is there another agenda?

Of course, I might be completely wrong, and the Greater Exeter Visioning Board has been discussing something completely different. But if so, what? A Greater Exeter Unitary Authority perhaps? There is an obvious link between the joint strategic plan proposal and the so-called “Devolution” bid for spending powers to be transferred from central government to the “Heart of the South West”, made up of Devon County Council, Somerset County Council, Torbay Council and Plymouth City Council [2]. The district councils like Exeter are at present secondary players in this, a position with which Exeter for one is not comfortable.

NOTES:

[1] The full report is at http://committees.exeter.gov.uk/documents/s52597/EXECUTIVE%20-%20Proposed%20Greater%20Exeter%20Strategic%20Plan%20-%2012%20July%202016%20-%20FINAL.pdf

[2] I will have more to say about the “Devolution” bid in a later post . Meanwhile a useful update is at item 76 of the minutes of the Exeter City Council Executive meeting on 12 July, at http://committees.exeter.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=112&MId=4469&Ver=4

Source: https://agreeninexeter.com

More on the PCC Hernandez idea for volunteer police drivers

“Devon and Cornwall’s Crime Tsar has come under fire for defending a new police scheme appealing for volunteer drivers to give officers lifts to routine jobs.

The region’s Police Crime Commissioner (PCC), Alison Hernandez, has spoken out in support of ‘police support volunteers’ after Plymouth officers turned to Twitter to find drivers to take them to meetings, police stations and other matters.

The scheme has since been slammed by union bosses, who are concerned about the use of unpaid “amateurs”, while Miss Hernandez’s political opponents have called it “desperate”.

But the Tory commissioner, who was elected earlier this year, insists using volunteers will help “free up” officers on the street.

“It is great that members of the public want to play a part in local policing, and the role of volunteers, while not replacing officers and staff, is important in contributing to our efficiency and effectiveness in Devon and Cornwall,” she told The Herald.

“There are many ways this is demonstrated. The Plymouth volunteer drivers scheme helps to free up officers to be on the streets. That is exactly where people tell me that they want to see officers.

“I support this scheme and urge local residents to put their names forward if they can, or look for other opportunities across the force area.”

But Gareth Derrick, who stood against Miss Hernandez as the Labour candidate in the PCC Devon and Cornwall elections in May, described the scheme as “desperate”.

“This is yet another indication of how far we have fallen in being prepared to accept inadequate funding of key public services under this Tory government,” he said.

I would have expected our newly-elected PCC to be pushing hard for the police funding formula review – not putting into place frankly desperate schemes to keep our police force on the move.”

It comes after Unison bosses expressed concern at the increased use of volunteers to replace paid staff.

In a new report, the trade union found a “bewildering range of police functions” were now being given to “well-meaning amateurs” at a time of massive cuts to the general workforce.

This includes volunteer drivers, stolen goods researchers, intelligence inputters and crime scene investigators – roles which would normally be paid.

Fred Jerome, regional Unison spokesman, said the volunteer scheme in Plymouth was currently “small scale” but he warned against possible expansion in the future.

“From what they [Devon and Cornwall police] are saying, it already happens and has been happening,” he revealed.

“In general, it’s small scale and a lot are retired police force. It seems to be a way for older people to do something helpful.

“But if it were to expand and become a full-time job, it should be treated as a full-time job.

“It is something that seems fairly innocuous at the moment but we are keeping a close eye on it.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/crime-tsar-under-fire-after-backing-scheme-where-volunteers-drive-police-to-jobs-across-plymouth/story-29607435-detail/story.html

Guess what our new PCC Hernandez has come up with now!

“A cash-strapped police force is appealing for volunteer drivers to ferry its officers to jobs.

Devon and Cornwall Police said helpers, who will use cars from their pool, will cover journeys to community meetings, between stations and “a range of other matters”.

The force said the money-saving scheme in Plymouth is part of a programme to free up officers to spend more time on the beat.

Devon and Cornwall’s Police and Crime Commissioner, Alison Hernandez, said: “It is great that members of the public want to play a part in local policing and the role of volunteers, while not replacing officers and staff, is important in contributing to our efficiency and effectiveness.”

But Gareth Derrick, Labour candidate in the PCC elections, slammed the move as “desperate”. He said: “This is another indication of how far we have fallen in being prepared to accept inadequate funding of key public services under this Tory government .”

Volunteer drivers would work shifts of two to four hours but not work after 6pm or on weekends. They must pass a strict vetting and driving tests. Union Unison has voiced concern at the recruitment of thousands of volunteers to replace axed roles. Devon and Cornwall Police has lost 500 full-time officers since December 2010.

But Jonathan Isaby of right-wing pressure group the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: “Schemes like this can help free up officers’ time and reduce costs for taxpayers.”

Other forces already using volunteer drivers include North Yorkshire.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/cash-strapped-police-appeal-volunteer-8605307