“Homebuilding in England is set to drop for a fifth straight decade to the lowest number since World War II, according to the Centre for Policy Studies. That’s despite government pledges to step up construction to ease a chronic shortage that’s pushed prices out of the reach of many. Just 1.3 million new dwellings will be built in the 10 years through 2019, less than half the 3 million constructed in the 1960s. …”
Monthly Archives: January 2019
EDA Councillor calls out Highways Department for inconsistency in Sidford
“‘Inconsistent’ highways bosses have been slammed for supporting a plan to build 40 homes when they refused to support one house being built just down the road.
District Councillor Marianne Rixson raised concerns about two cases where she claims the county council’s highways department’s decision making had been ‘inconsistent’.
Highways objected to an application to build one home in Sidford Road because the proposed development was next to the A375 Sidford Road, which connects to Sidmouth and Honiton, as well as to the A3052 Exeter to Lyme Regis at Sidford Cross at a staggered traffic light junction. At peak times, the signalled junction can cause long tailbacks past the new home.
However, Highways supported an application to build 40 retirement flats at Green Close in Sidford, just 0.2 miles away..
In its report Highways said the development at Green Close would ‘potentially’ generate a slight increase in traffic compared to the site’s former use as a care home.
Cllr Rixson said the South Lawn access to the development ‘in effect is single track because of parked cars’.
“There will be 40 apartments with 24 car parking spaces. These additional vehicles will be entering and exiting via South Lawn and this could cause tailbacks at the junction of South Lawn with the A375, yet Highways raised no objections,” she said.
“I really cannot understand why Highways raise no objections to major developments yet for a single dwelling produce arguments which would be applicable to all three of the applications listed below.
“The Herald attended the meeting on December 4 and heard East Devon District Council members being sympathetic toward my objections to the change of access but stated that, as highways had not objected, it would not succeed at appeal.”
A Devon County Council spokesman said: “Despite the close proximity of the two developments the implications of the two schemes on the highways network were very different, site specific and not comparable. When as the highways authority we give our observations regarding developments we follow the National Planning Policy Framework, the National Planning Policy Guidance and the Manual for Streets to ensure that our recommendations are consistent as possible.”
https://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/highway-bosses-slammed-for-decisions-at-sidmouth-1-5839296
Tory councillor says you can’t try Vegan-uary in Shropshire!
And these people are running councils! Not to mention the conflict of interest as he “comes from a farming background”!
“A senior Tory councillor in Shropshire has called for adverts promoting veganism on buses to be removed because of the county’s agricultural tradition. Steve Charmley, the deputy council leader, posted a series of tweets about posters encouraging commuters to try ‘Veganuary’ – an animal product-free month – which were paid for by Shropshire Veggies and Vegans society.
He claimed that bus company Arriva was being inadvertently used to promote the “fake news of vegangalists” and called on bosses to meet him to discuss the issue. …”
https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/senior-tory-councillor-demands-vegan-adverts-be-removed-from-buses/
Business rates killing high street shops
“Leading retailers called for a major overhaul of business rates yesterday after Next suffered a sharp slump in store sales in the run up to Christmas.
With pressure mounting on ministers to reform the outdated tax, fashion chain Next said sales in its 500-plus stores fell 9.2 per cent over the crucial festive period.
In a clear sign of how shopping habits have shifted, the company said online sales soared 15.2 per cent in the same period, meaning overall revenues were up. …”
“UK CEOs make more in first three days of 2019 than worker’s annual salary”
“… Calculations by the High Pay Centre thinktank and the professional HR body the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) show top executives are earning 133 times more than the average worker, at a rate of around £1,020 per hour or £3.9m annually. That’s up 11% compared to a year earlier.
It means CEOs working average 12-hour days would only have to clock in for 29 hours in 2019 to earn the median £29,574 of British staff.
The figures have prompted criticism from both unions and shareholder groups. …”
THAT table … and another one …
The 22 ft £50 table:

and another one (wonder who this one is going to?)

East Devon Alliance – action AND positivity !
As published in Express and Echo today) (rejected by Midweek Herald)
“Former Conservative District Councillor, Mrs Liverton has recently (in the local press) accused East Devon Alliance (EDA) Independent Councillors of “constant negativity” and lack of positive action.
• Was it (and is it) “negative” to campaign for greater transparency, democracy and accountability in local government as members of EDA and other Independents are constantly doing? This is clearly necessary and was done by other local groups supported by EDA during the EDDC office re-location affair when the District Council repeatedly withheld information from the public and was twice castigated by the Information Commissioner.
• Was it (and is it) “negative” to campaign against the closure of hospital beds (and local hospitals) across the district? Again, this was done and is being done by EDA councillors and other Independents at both district and county level and has been supported by many concerned members of the public.
• And is it now “negative” to campaign for more action against the huge rise in poverty and homelessness in this country as recently revealed by the United Nations Observer and as EDA Councillors Cathy Gardner and Marianne Rixson did at Full Council recently*?
• And is it “negative” to campaign, (as members and councillors of EDA are doing), for a National Park for “Wessex” to include the AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) of East Devon which currently lacks proper protection against inappropriate development?
Thanks to you, the voters, EDA is a positive new force at EDDC. Meetings are open to the public. Come and see for yourself in 2019, at the new Honiton offices you are paying for (with a long-term loan).
* The attached photo shows how the EDA motion brought complete cross-party unity, unheard of in Mrs Liverton’s time, to the Full Council recently.

Mike Temple, Sidmouth”
Mahogany tables …..
Story moving to regional media – watch this space.
If any town or parish council or local charity WAS or WAS NOT contacted about this or any other item for sale, Owl would be VERY interested to hear details!
Allegedly sold to Councillor Philip Skinner when officers and councillors given first dibs at Knowle furniture surplus to requirements – 22 ft extending mahogany board room table (only bid):
£50
Meanwhile on E-bay bay today:
Buy it now price
£12,000 mahogany board room table
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Very-Large-Antique-Library-Table-Mahogany-Victorian-Boardroom-c-1870/323604161547
Buy it now price
Modern plain wooden board room table, well-used 7 m
£600
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Boardroom-table-meeting-table-wood-1-5m-7m/401613530214?hash=item5d82082466:g:DzYAAOSwPR9bu0La
East Devon average house price more than £50,000 higher than average
“A first-time buyer in East Devon is expected to pay an average of £220,486 to make their first step on the property ladder as part of an overall price increase of 1.6 per cent.
East Devon has seen property values increase by 3.6 per cent over the last 12 months and data from the Office of National Statistics shows the average property price in the area was £286,528. This price is over £50,000 higher than the UK average.
According to data from Rightmove, the average house price in Sidmouth was £358,370 which is a nine per cent increase since 2015.
The area has a similar average price to Ottery St Mary at £351,814 but is more expensive than Branscombe.
In the UK, house prices have increased by 3.5 per cent in 2018 and the average property owner in East Devon has seen their house value jump by £53,000 in the last five years.”
https://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/east-devon-house-price-rise-1-5837746
EDDC “to start charging developers who build new homes to pay for waste containers”
“Developers will be charged for supplying new build properties with recycling and waste containers in East Devon.
Currently the council provides all new properties with the containers free of charge, but the cost of supplying them to between 750 and 900 new East Devon homes every year is escalating.
John Golding, Strategic Lead for Housing, Health & Environment, told councillors on Wednesday night that around £112,000 a year is spent by the council on supplying containers each year. …”
https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/council-start-charging-developers-who-2384645
Millionaire’s academy schools “cheating”
“ne of the country’s top-performing chains of academy schools has been accused of “systemic cheating” during Ofsted inspections at a number of its primaries, a HuffPost UK investigation can reveal.
Concerned teachers and a governor have made serious allegations that the renowned Harris Federation, which runs 47 schools in and around London, is “gaming the system” during Ofsted inspections at more than one of its schools.
The academy trust, one of the largest in England, was set up by Conservative peer and ex-Carpetright mogul Lord Philip Harris, and has often been praised by government ministers as a shining example of the academy schools model.
But insiders at some Harris primary schools have told HuffPost UK the unrelenting drive for success from the academy trust has led to an endemic culture of “cheating and rule bending” during Ofsted.
Those concerned say the Harris Federation needs good or outstanding Ofsted ratings at all its schools in order to justify the bumper salaries of top staff. Its CEO Dan Moynihan was paid at least £420,000 in 2015-16.
One former Harris teacher, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told HuffPost UK: “Staff are parachuted in to protect the Ofsted grade.
“This is all about the veneer of excellence without substance to hold up the PR about all Harris schools being good or outstanding at Ofsted.”
A number of sources close to Harris schools have made specific allegations about highly experienced executive teachers from a central team being brought into schools on the eve of Ofsted inspections, allegedly in order to boost performance.
Critics say this type of support is not available to local authority schools and the issue is a critical one, as a good or outstanding Ofsted rating is a key factor when parents select schools for their children. …”
“Say NO to Sidford Business Park” campaign newsletter and fundraising event
“We hope that you had a good Christmas and wish you a very Happy New Year!
In this newsletter –
v Approaching any potential planning appeal
v A fundraising event on 23 February
v Opening a Campaign bank account
Approaching any potential planning appeal
We still don’t know whether the applicants who submitted the planning application to build the Business Park in Sidford intend to appeal against the District Council’s decision to refuse planning permission for this site, the second application in as many years. Should the applicants want to appeal they have up to 6 months from when the District Council made its decision to do so.
The applicants therefore have until 18 April to lodge any appeal. Should the applicants decide not to appeal it would be nice to think that they would announce this so that local residents can be put out of their misery as otherwise this matter sits uneasily over us all.
We have had to assume that without any evidence to the contrary, the applicants will at some point submit an appeal. We are therefore preparing ourselves should an appeal happen.
At an appeal the District Council will have to defend its decision to refuse the planning application. As its grounds for refusing planning permission were restricted to the narrow issue of the highway not being suitable for the anticipated size and volume of traffic that the Business Park could be expected to generate, we have decided that we would want the Campaign to be a party to the appeal process.
The Campaign, and many of you who have supported it, have cited broader reasons, than those put forward by the District Council, for opposing the proposed Business Park. Therefore, the Campaign would want to become a formally registered party which could fully participate at an appeal. We believe that the District Council was wrong to only rely upon highways arguments for its refusal, hence the reason why we feel the need to be a party to any appeal hearing.
However, if the Campaign is going to do all of this effectively, we believe that we are going to have to employ a planning professional to make the arguments and to cross examine the applicants’ representatives and witnesses for us. As you can imagine to do this won’t come cheaply. Potentially, we would need to raise several tens of thousands of pounds to be professionally represented. We are in the process of contacting various people with the intention of identifying such a professional and a likely cost.
It is also our hope that other organisations who submitted objections to the planning application would also want to be a party to any appeal process. In particular, we would encourage the Town Council, which submitted a broad set of objections, would make its arguments at any appeal hearing. Indeed, there is no reason why other organisations such as the County Council couldn’t do likewise.
As we say, we are having to assume that we will need to be professionally represented at an appeal if one is held. That means that we have to think about how we might raise many thousands of pounds. One way will be to seek pledges of funds from our supporters. This is something that we will return to in a future newsletter.
A fundraising event on 23 February
In the meantime we are holding a fundraising ceilidh on the evening of Saturday 23 February in Sidford Hall. Tickets will be £5.00 and you will be able to bring your own drink. We will be holding a raffle and inviting donations of prizes for it. Further information about this event will be circulated soon and, in the meantime, we are approaching several businesses in Sidford and Sidbury to see whether they would agree to sell tickets.
If you are willing to donate a prize for the raffle please let us know! Please put this date in your diary!
Opening a Campaign bank account
So far, we have managed to run this Campaign on the basis of raising cash from you, our supporters. At our last public meeting we explained how much we had raised and what we had spent it on. On several occasions we have been asked whether we have a bank account to allow supporters to give donations by cheque. We have resisted opening a bank account as frankly it’s a time-consuming process.
But as we may now have to possibly raise a significant amount of money to pay for professional representation at an appeal, we have started the process of opening a Lloyds Bank account. Once this process has been finalised, we will circulate its details.
As we said at the beginning of this newsletter, we wish you a Happy New Year. Let’s hope that our wishes for this matter to come to a quick conclusion come to fruition.
Best wishes
Campaign Team”
Luxury properties snapped up by foreign buyers after pound fell
“The global super-rich have taken advantage of the Brexit-induced decline in the value of sterling to buy up three times as many £10m-plus luxury homes as before the referendum vote.
Some 300 homes sold for more than £10m each in the tax year to April 2017 (the latest for which figures are available), an increase from 100 sold during the preceding 12-month period. The figures, released by HM Revenue and Customs on Wednesday following a freedom of information request, were rounded to the nearest 10 by HMRC. …”
Christmas catch-up
Owl didn’t want to spoil Christmas but here are a few of the stories that would have done so over the ‘festive’ season:
Hedge funds win even if retailers fail:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/number-people-spending-christmas-day-13772221
France to overtake UK as world’s sixth largest economy:
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-to-overtake-uk-as-world-s-sixth-biggest-economy-post-brexit-a4025411.html
UK is institutionally ageist:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/dec/26/uk-is-completely-and-institutionally-ageist
Scrap the parliamentary lobby:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/dec/26/scrap-parliamentary-lobby-westminster-journalists
Richest 1% will have two-thirds of the world’s wealth by 2030:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/apr/07/global-inequality-tipping-point-2030
Minister tells councils to put CLOSED libraries in failing high streets:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-minister-slammed-telling-councils-13777880
Universal credit is damaging mental health:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8069484/universal-credit-making-brits-ill-mental-health/
Tory MP wants legal aid reintroduced now he needs it:
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2018/dec/27/its-completely-wrong-falsely-accused-tory-mp-attacks-legal-aid-cuts
90 people die each DAY waiting for social care:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/shocking-nhs-figures-reveal-90-13791144
NHS cuts halt 70,000 operations:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-nhs-cuts-staff-beds-13795124
Councils ripped-off by private landlords:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jan/01/councils-ripped-off-by-private-landlords-experts-warn
and
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/homeless-accommodation-now-costs-1billion-13802618
EDDC says community hospitals do not contribute to social well-being
“Here is my letter, about Ottery Hospital, which was published in the Sidmouth Herald about ten days ago [from Ottery Hospital campaigner Philip Algar]:
Last August, I asked the Ottery Town Council to request the East Devon District Council to declare the Ottery Hospital to be an asset of community value. Such a designation would have delayed any decision by NHS Properties to sell the hospital.
The request was rejected by EDDC because the hospital was not a community asset.
Unlike swimming pools and pubs, it did not contribute to “social wellbeing”! This is manifest nonsense but there is a more disturbing aspect to this EDDC decision which challenges common sense and justice.
Apparently, there is no precise definition of social wellbeing so any determination must be subjective. This is demonstrated by the fact that three district councils in Devon have granted the status to hospitals in their areas.
This raises some serious questions.
What was different about the request to give the Ottery hospital this designation? EDDC admit that they gave more weight to an NHS objection than they did to the wishes of the people of Ottery and district whom they are supposed to represent.
Why did NHS Properties oppose this proposal whilst other councils granted the desired status to hospitals serving their electors? Who should we blame for having our hospital treated in this way? Is it EDDC for cravenly giving in to the NHS or should it be the NHS itself which may plan to close the hospital entirely and sell the site and so opposes any action that could delay implementing such a decision?”