The delayed Local Plan – the missing document tracked down and a commentary on it (“What the Dickins”)

An EDA correspondent has tracked down the elusive “attachment” to the agenda of the Development Management Committee regarding the delay to the Local Plan (see post below)

DM260814-Emerging Housing Numbers

and a critique of this document is given below by the same correspondent:

What the Dickins?

A paper by Matt Dickins, EDDC’s Planning Policy Manager, to be presented to Development Mgmt Committee on 26 August  (see link above) makes for depressing reading. Residents of East Devon hoping that EDDC will finally be getting its act together on housing land provision will be deeply disappointed.

As many will know, EDDC is obliged to prove that it has an objective evaluation of housing land provision. The absence of such an evaluation, and EDDC’s failure to prove both a five-year land supply and have a Local Plan in place, means that it remains open season for developers. An objective evaluation of housing land need is achieved through the production of a Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA). In his scathing review of EDDC’s draft Local Plan earlier this year Planning Inspector Anthony Thickett called the absence of an up to date SHMA a “serious failing” on the part of the Council. (He also found that EDDC’s argument for 4,000 ‘overspill’ migration numbers, mostly from Exeter, had “no empirical basis”.)

Does Mr Dickins come bearing good news for EDDC and the people of East Devon that the day of the SHMA is at hand? Not at all. His paper comprises six pages of complacent waffle. Notwithstanding that some research should have already been done, “unfortunately there have been delays”. There may need to be discussions with adjacent authorities. (We know that, Mr Dickins. Exeter CC is looking to appropriate East Devon countryside.) While Mr Dickins’ paper points out that demographically East Devon is likely to see a major increase in population from the over 65s – surely implying a need for more sheltered accommodation in towns with services than new build on greenfield sites – his paper concludes lamely that “at this stage it is not possible to provide a timetable for completion of the full SHMA work”! The consequence? “We can only conclude that we do not have a 5 year housing land supply and continue to consider application [sic] accordingly”.

To translate: EDDC has no idea when the SHMA will be finished, it won’t even venture a guess, and in the meantime the lack of a five-year housing land supply [and Local Plan] means that developers will consider to maintain the upper hand in a district where two-thirds of the land is AONB. This is a woeful paper: DMC should send Mr Dickins to the Naughty Step and require him to try again. Time someone got a grip while there is any countryside left in East Devon.

Local Plan delayed again – unlikely to be approved for many months

Recap: our draft Local Plan was thrown out by the Planning Inspector, Mr Thickett, because – oh, so many reasons – mainly because pretty much all of the figures in it were either too old or too unreliable. We were told to go back to the drawing board.

A crucial aspect of a local plan is that there must be a “5 year land supply” – i.e. enough available land to meet the district’s agreed needs for the next 5 years to enable building to start quickly and to keep up with demand. Those local authorities which had persistently underperformed in this area over the previous period were told that they would have to have a 6 year land supply – EDDC was one of those authorities.

Whichever way EDDC seemed to cut it, we never reached that magic 5 or 6 year level. As a result, developers are pretty much given free rein to build anywhere in East Devon unless EDDC can provide very strong reasons that they cannot – this as a result of the Coalition government’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which ripped up all previous rules and gave the green light to building just about anywhere.

EDDC thereafter took this to heart and passed pretty much anything and everything that came its way (and is still coming its way) from developers. It was left to local communities (Feniton, Seaton, Newton Poppleford) to argue their own corners and find their own money to fight developers. In Feniton and Seaton the communities rallied and defeated them (only to find that, in both places, it seems the developers are coming back to fight again). In Newton Poppleford there was a perverse decision from the DMC – yes to a Clinton Devon Estates development but no to another developer at Badger Close using the same reasoning, but turned on its head for the latter.

EDDC promised the Planning Inspector that there would be a fast review (which had to include dealing with other local authorities in the area where they said that they had run out of space for their developments and needed us to build to take up their shortfall). The Inspector told EDDC that he would be ready to re-examine the draft local plan in October or November 2014.

Bear in mind that the new draft local plan once again had to go out for public consultation – a project that lasts at least 6 weeks and then demands officer time to collate the results. It became pretty obvious that EDDC was not going to meet this target.

Now we have confirmation that this is the case. At the next

Development Management Committee on Tuesday 26 August 2014 at 2 pm

a report is tabled on the agenda entitled “Objectively Assessed Housing Numbers for East Devon – Emerging Work.

On that agenda, currently (21/8/2014 10.40 am) there is supposed to be a link to that report but the link is missing so anyone attempting to read the report will not be able to find it. However, an eagle-eyed correspondent on Councillor Claire Wright’s blog has traced it (unfortunately the link given does not work) and no amount of searching on the EDDC website brings it up.  However, this is what the document says:

“At this stage it is not possible to provide a timetable for completion of the full SHMA (strategic housing market assessment) work.  There are complexities to the task that will need working through.  However, officers of all the authorities involved in the commission are working together to come to a final set of recommendations on the objectively assessed housing numbers for the SHMA as a whole and for the individual authorities”.

It adds “In the meantime based on the available information we can only conclude that we do not have a 5 year housing land supply and continue to consider applications accordingly”.

It then suggests that the growth point area near Skypark will cause many businesses to set up and as a result housing should be factored in to address the extra jobs (see below for a post on those extra jobs which are mostly self-employment and particularly self-employment in the construction industry – ephemeral jobs).

So, the status quo continues.  No land supply, happy developers, very, very unhappy residents.

 

“Honiton for Sale” part 2 – some questions but very little chance of answers

This week’s Midweek Herald adds some interesting information to the story carried yesterday that former Chairman of East Devon District Council and town councillor, Peter Halse, believes that Honiton is being asset-stripped to pay for the vanity project EDDC HQ office relocation.

The Midweek Herald adds more comments from Councillor Halse:

… “In my personal view, Honiton is being put up for sale. Assets are being raised in order for the council to move to the outskirts of Exeter, which is not in the public interest”.

Mr Halse told the meeting that he had made strong protests to the district council regarding the move and added that he thought the district council had now realised “the Knowle is not quite the jewel in East Devon’s crown as it thought it was and that it was having to find other assets elsewhere.

An EDDC spokesperson said in response to this:

… “The question of succession to East Devon Business Centre has given us an opportunity to look again at how we can help meet the needs of business into the future in a words of enterprise and entrepreneurism very different from what existed when Heathpark Business Centre first opened its doors.

Lead members for business and officers carried out a tender exercise and interviewed four different consultancies. The chosen company, Carter Jonas, are in the process of gathering evidence and are expected to report back with their findings and recommendations within the next month or so”.

This raises several interesting questions:

If a respected and long-serving majority party Councillor has no real idea what is going on – how on earth do councillors not privy to the thoughts of those in the “inner sanctum” understand what they are voting for with the Skypark project?

The press release speaks only of something going out to tender – it does not say exactly what the tender was for and we will never know because the Asset Management Forum at EDDC has always met in secret and provides no agendas or minutes of its meetings for the public.

Councillor Halse’s comments seem to imply that EDDC is not going to get as much as it had wanted for Knowle. They have long said that the move will be “cost neutral” but that was when only Knowle and Manston Depot were mentioned. Is it still cost neutral when you add in the loss of the Heathpark site and the East Devon Business Centre? Again we will never know because the Relocation Working Party meetings are also held in secret and no agendas or minutes are produced.

We have a situation now where ALL decisions are now made in secret. Instead of information going to committees for discussion and decision they are being referred to creatively-named “Forums” and “Groups” so that the decision-making can all take place behind closed doors where even majority party councillors have no idea what is going on.

Let us hope that when the next council is convened it votes for a Committee system of decision-making rather than an Executive Board system which allows a very small number of people – hand-picked by the Leader – to take decisions on behalf of the majority.

Remember Leader Diviani’s last election promise: Clean, Green and Seen. Not Unclean, Ungreen and Unseen.

Developer allowed to chop protected trees because local authority did not mention them in search documents

One to watch out for, councillors – and to alert our council Arboriculturalist about:

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19702:trial-over-uprooting-of-tree-subject-to-preservation-order-collapses&catid=58&Itemid=26

We don’t want EDDC getting sloppy with our developers do we.

Most new jobs are consultancy or self- employment

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said that 1.1 million jobs have been created since the start of 2008.

But of those, 732,000 are accounted for by the self-employed, a category of worker that tends to earn roughly half the wages of those in staff jobs.

Construction remains the single biggest sector for self employment.

Source:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-28866302

The mystery is that, if most are in construction (outdoors and not needing much office space)and many self-employed people work from home or at small business hubs (like the East Devon Business Centre that is being demolished to pay for Skypark relocation) why are we building smaller houses and more and more big industrial sheds in East Devon?

Tourism is our biggest industry and our biggest earner – where is the stimulus for it from our district council (apart from flogging the family silver in Exmouth).

EDDC “Tourism Champion” – hello, anyone out there?

East Devon homes cost more than 12 times average annual salaries

http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/West-Country-expensive-home-buyers-London/story-22767121-detail/story.html

Persimmon profits up 57%, average house price now £265,000

Persimmon has a large number of sites locally. It has reported pre-tax profits for the half year up to £212.9 million. The Evening Standard website article also mentions that the average UK house price rose by 10.2% in the 12 months to June and reached a record high of £265,000 for the average house. However, the good news is that the Office of National Statistics had expected prices to rise 11.2% so we must be thankful for small mercies!

“Who dares gets battered” at Colyton Council says editor of local newspaper.

Four out of 13 members of Colyton Town Council represent the nearby village of Colyford and those four are becoming increasingly annoyed as Colyton appears to be grabbing all the goodies for the town rather than sharing them with the smaller village.

Editor of the View newspapers, Philip Evans, criticised Colyton Town Council for trying to stop reporters writing

” … on matters that the council would prefer not to be publicised, despite such matters being discussed in open council, the inference being that we should onbly report on the positives and never the negatives. That view, of course, is contrary to the basic prinnciples of democracy and we have resisted any attempt to stop us doing our job responsibly.

We really upset the council recently when we had the audacity to record their deliberations at a particularly controversial meeting, to ensure we got it exactly right. To do was contrary sto the council’s standing orders (rules). We had never been sent a copy of tose standing orders and they are not listed on the council’s website, at the library, on the council notice board or any other place.

The council threatened to report us to the Press Complaints Commission for contravening their rules but common sense prevailed and if we want to record their meetings in future, we have to seek permission, which, from time to time, we will do.

[The Editor is wrong in this matter: since 6 August 2014 it has been illegal for ANY council to stop anyone recording, tweeting or videoing their meetings as long as they are not causing an obstruction].

He continues: ” … But it was his [The Mayor of Colyford’s] democratic right to riase the matter and he should not be unnecessarily castigated because he did not toe [not tow as appears in the editorial} the party line.

“Town Up for Sale” says Honiton Mayor, EDDC Councillor (and former Chairman of EDDC) as he criticises his own council on the Knowle relocation

Councillor Peter Halse, Honiton Town Councillor, East Devon District Councillor and former Chairman of EDDC is quoted in the “View from Honiton” newspaper today. He says the town is being “put up for sale” by district councillors to fund their costly relocation project. The article is quoted below”

“He [Councillor Halse] says decisions were being made that were not in the interests of Honiton residents. Land at the Heathpark estate had been identified as a possible location for EDDC’s new office complex. But in a controversial move earlier this year, councillors opted to reject the Honiton site and build new headquarters at SkyPark on the outskirts of the district. The land [at Honiton] now looks likely to be sold for the development of a new supermarket.

And in a further blow to the local economy, the district’s business hub – currently based at Heathpark – has also been lined up for closure.

At a town counbcil meeting last week, former mayor Councillor Vernon Whitlock raised the issue of businesses being forced to relocate. And Councillor Halse admitted that he shared the concerns of businesses, councillors and residents, who feel the town is being stripped of its assets.

“I am a loggerheads with the (district) council on the way this has been done. I am disappointed that they will be demolishing a building that is of great use to the town and is not costing anything. Initially they told us another facility would be provided, but it turns out that they were thinking the private sector could replace it. The fact of the matter is that Honiton is being put up for sale and its assets are being razed in order for the district council to move to the outskirts of Exeter”.

Fighting for Feniton – yet again; Wain Homes continues its onslaught

Rumours that Wainhomes is applying to extend its existing site by a further 31 houses are true: plans for these new houses have been on display at the sales office on site. Wainhomes claims that, as a ‘responsible developer’ it’s just to show prospective buyers what might happen, although it’s hard to read this as anything other than marketing houses for which permission has not even been granted. Fight for Feniton understands that one buyer who purchased one of the 50 houses to be built at Winchester Park, and who was assured solemnly that their countryside view would be protected, only discovered otherwise when Wainhomes cheerfully handed them the keys to their new property and said they’d be building 31 more houses, some of which would be blocking their view!

The history of this site is one of development by stealth. Wainhomes’ initial application in 2011 was for a staggering 170 properties stretching from Station Road across to Green Lane. Wainhomes then supposedly ‘listened’ to local opposition, and reduced its proposal to ‘just’ 50 houses, which were eventually allowed at appeal in 2012, despite massive opposition from the village, Parish and District Councils, owing to Feniton’s inadequate infrastructure, narrow roads, minimal employment opportunities and considerable flooding problems.

Wainhomes’ next attack on the village was for an application for 83 units, which was comprehensively thrown out at a ‘Super Inquiry’ of the Planning Inspectorate in January this year: roughly four months after that result was announced, Wainhomes has now come back with its proposal for 31 houses. Let there be no doubt that Wainhomes has no intention of stopping at 31, 83 or anything else until it has concreted over the entire site and built (at least) the 170 it always intended.

It’s the Wainhomes way: the village of Dobwalls, in Cornwall, is faced with a proposal by the same developer to build 62 houses, the local Parish Council being up in arms since their roads are narrow, the infrastructure can’t cope, and it’d increase the size of the village by 20%. Sound familiar? – see

http://www.cornishguardian.co.uk/Wainhomes-puts-forward-plans-62-new-houses/story-21741742-detail/story.html

As of writing Wainhomes has only announced its intention to build these extra houses: a formal application is likely to be made in September. Fight for Feniton will continue the battle against inappropriate development in the village. Keep up to date with the latest news by attending Feniton Parish Council meetings, and checking the following websites:

Fight for Feniton
http://theffff.wordpress.com/

blogs for District Councillor Susie Bond
http://www.susiebond.co.uk) and
County Councillor Claire Wright
http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/site/blog

the East Devon Alliance (http://eastdevonalliance.org/
and of course Feniton Parish Council http://fenitonparishcouncil.wordpress.com/

Exeter Airport gets busier and busier

Replace that triple glazing at EDDC vanity HQ with quadruple glazing perhaps:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Good-news-Exeter-Airport-growth-continues/story-22762540-detail/story.html

Manufacturers call for national infrastructure authority

“Chris Leslie, shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, said: “The EEF is right to say we need a new approach to address Britain’s long-term infrastructure needs.

“Labour will establish an independent national infrastructure commission. This would help to end the dither and delay we have seen on the big decisions Britain needs to take to secure its future.

“With business support growing for a new body to identify Britain’s infrastructure needs and hold governments to account for meeting them, it’s now time other political parties backed the idea too.”

Unfortunately, one manufacturer’s essential infrastructure is inevitably also someone else’s land. It would be interesting if we saw the rise of NIMFYs – Not In My Factory Yard!

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/smes/call-for-infrastructure-authority-7630634

Politics: “childish, superficial and rotten” – who says? An MP

… “With so many people in Government, you could replace them with laptop computers and it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference. You could just programme them to vote when you needed them to vote. But I couldn’t do that. I would rather not be in politics at all.”

Would he say that Parliament is rotten? “I would. It’s completely rotten. I’ve seen people deliver genuinely powerful speeches on particular issues, then the bell goes for the vote and they go straight to the government lobby.” Does David Cameron find him irritating? “I’m sure he does,” Goldsmith says with a wry smile. “And I don’t blame him.” …

… If Goldsmith could achieve one thing during his time in Parliament, then it would be implementing a proper recall system, giving constituents the right to get rid of their MP if he or she behaves badly. “At the moment, I could go on holiday for eight months or join the BNP. I could do almost anything, bar go to prison, and there would be nothing my constituents could do about it.”

Currently, Nick Clegg is overseeing the reform of the recall system – no laughing at the back about the decision to give the job to a man who backtracked on several key promises the moment he got a whiff of power – and though the Deputy PM claimed in June that he and Goldsmith were in agreement, this is clearly not the case at all. Goldsmith says that Clegg’s proposals are a “disgrace” in his view.

“For a long time, he argued against the whole principle of recall, saying that we would end up with kangaroo courts. So he has come up with an alternative, which really is the last word in con. It’s an attempt to make people feel that they have been empowered without actually empowering them. There is enough anger out there from the public towards me and all my colleagues in Parliament, and the moment the public realise they have been conned yet again, I think it will just boil over. I think there will be a massive backlash.”

“So Goldsmith has set up a cross-party group to come up with an alternative plan – Andrew Mitchell, Kate Hoey and David Davis are involved – and they are just about to sign it off. Whether or not it goes through is another matter entirely, though it is said that the new Chief Whip, Michael Gove, is very keen to show his support for it, and not just because it might be one in the eye for Clegg. Goldsmith, of course, couldn’t possibly comment on that.” …

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/11037506/Zac-Goldsmith-Politics-Its-childish-superficial-and-rotten.html

Average British home now has one less bedroom and is almost half the size of homes in the 1920s

“The average home typically covered 1,647 sq ft and boasted four bedrooms in the 1920s, according to analysis by the Royal Institution of British Architects, but today’s versions have three bedrooms and are 925 sq ft.”

Wonder what the size of the average Cranbrook home is?

Source: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/aug/17/housebuilders-price-bubble-

Think tank suggests that people should pay more to live next to a park

http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/aug/16/green-spaces-park-local-tax-householders-councils

Oddly, it doesn’t suggest you should pay LESS if you live next a factory!

Budleigh Car Park Round 2 – traders and residents bite back

http://www.devon24.co.uk/news/new_twist_in_campaign_to_keep_car_park_free_1_3728674

and as our commentator informs us, look here for details of the covenants:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/budleigh_salterton_car_park

Will it be yet another case of EDDC “buying out” the covenants from Clinton Devon Estates as they did with Exmouth seafront, and, if so, has this cost been factored in?

When black is white and white is black …

Here is an article from 2001 where the Conservative Party (then in opposition) bemoan the fact that, under Labour, there is too much town hall secrecy and pledging that, should they get into power, everything will change.

“Before the election, Tony Blair promised to make government more open. But obsessed with control-freakery, Labour are now creating a new culture of secrecy in local councils.”

He warned that the new law could create a “breeding ground for inefficiency and corruption” and accused the government of trying to “sneak through” the regulations.

Tories will revoke law

Mr Norman pledged that a future Tory government would reverse the changes and “force” councils to open their meetings to both public and press alike.

But the new law was defended by a spokesman for the Department of the Environment who said that the old access to information regime was “not appropriate for the new executive constitutions” introduced by the Act.

“The system is changing, therefore the kinds of regulations you have covering scrutiny and access change as well.

“At the heart of the new system is accountability, efficiency and transparency.”

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1099004.stm

Buckinghamshire businesses raise £25,000 to research better ways of running local government and cutting waste

Including research into whether a unitary authority would save money:

https://make-a-donation.org/campaign/cutting-the-cost-of-local-government