Pegasus to exhibit plans for Knowle

And no doubt to do a bit of marketing. Interesting that they have done test drilling and these plans before getting planning permission … just the little matter of councillors voting to decamp to Honiton.

Surely they all have a prejudicial interest and it should be called in? Not that it will help … Wonder how many apartments will be affordable – LOL!

“A spokesperson for the developer said: “We wish to consult with the local community before progressing our proposals and are holding two public consultation events, the first in November, to give local residents an opportunity to view and comment on our initial scheme.”

Representatives from the firm will be at the Woodlands Hotel, in Station Road, on Tuesday, November 24, between 2pm and 7.30pm, and again on Wednesday, November 25, between noon and 7.30pm.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/pegasuslife_to_unveil_knowle_vision_at_pair_of_exhibitions_1_4317498

You have only until tomorrow to (attempt to) shape EDDC services

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/consultation-and-surveys/moving-and-improving-consultation/

But best guess is Devon and Somerset devolution and “greater Exeter” trumps our wishes!

Will remaining Sidmouth park land be worth even the £1 EDDC wants to sell it for?

http://saveoursidmouth.com/2015/11/06/no-rights-of-way-into-the-public-park-at-knowle-letter-to-the-press-contains-a-warning/

Moving and Improving questionnaire needs – improving!

The preamble to this survey includes:

“We sent out paper copies of our Moving and Improving questionnaire to 3,000 randomly selected households in the post. To make sure this stays as a random sample, everyone else has to complete this copy of the questionnaire. They both have the same questions.”

The implication of this statement is that the replies from the 3000 households will be analysed separately from the self-motivated respondents to the online survey.

Is this true? If so, will the results of both versions be published?

A correspondent also writes:

“I commented in my response to Q3 – for what reason might I visit the Honiton or Exmouth offices? – to the effect that I noted that “To attend a Council meeting” was not included in the list of boxes to tick.

I surmised that they hoped no-one would bother,”

How to make a bad housing situation worse

According to today’s Sunday Times Homes supplement, East Devon is in the top five areas to have recovered after the last credit crunch, after South Norfolk, Tonbridge and Malling, Stroud and East Hampshire.

This is put down to East Devon being “an affluent rural location where buyers are a little older and have built up plenty of equity. They are probably not mortgage dependent so are not constrained by tighter lending rules – which means that they can move more easily”.

And what does EDDC do: it flogs the Knowle site to a luxury retirement home builder to make a bad situation worse and thinks it can solve this crisis by building five “affordable” homes on a town centre car park.

Pegasus and EDDC jumping the gun at Knowle? Or just a Hallow’een prank!

This headline is currently the banner headline of East Devon District Council:

“Please be aware that contractors will be carrying out ground investigation on the car parks and grounds of the Knowle on Friday 30/Saturday 31 October and Friday 6/Saturday 7 November. This will involve works including drilling and some resultant noise. Works time will be restricted to between the hours of 9am and 5pm. If you need to speak to someone about these works then please contact Emma Webster at Pegasus Life Ltd – ewebster@pegasuslife.co.uk or call 07776 444341. Thank you for your understanding and patience.”

Will they be drilling the public parkland? And on Saturdays. No planning permission needed one presumes.

Transparency my ….

Interesting exchange of emails regarding the contract for Knowle between EDDC and Pegasus:

http://saveoursidmouth.com/2015/10/24/what-exactly-has-been-agreed-in-the-contracts-exchanged-for-the-knowle-site/

You can see why the Conservatives want to water down the Freedom of Information Act.

Council “hubs” and austerity cuts

Remember EDDC promised that if it moved to Honiton, it would have “hubs” in major towns: didn’t work for Mid Devon:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Downward-spiral-office-set-close/story-28028156-detail/story.html

Developer reveals Knowle luxury retirement homes plan

Despite assuring people that this would not be a gated community, the statements made were somewhat vague (except, of course, there will be no affordable housing):

Number of homes: undecided

“Most” people expected to be local

Facilities “could be” open to the public

Hmmm …

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/developer_reveals_hopes_for_knowle_1_4273815

Pegasus homes recently developed in Cornwall start at around £300,000 for a one bed flat and £600,000 for two beds plus service charge.

EDDC opens consultation on implications of HQ location – after the decision to move!

“13 October 2015
Council asks residents for their views on delivery of services

Moving and Improving consultation will give households across East Devon the chance to have their say on how and where council services will be delivered

Having made the decision to relocate its offices from Sidmouth to Honiton and Exmouth, East Devon District Council has launched its Moving and Improving public consultation, as part of its ongoing commitment to providing excellent services to the local community.

The council is carrying out the consultation to help inform decision making about how and where services should be provided so it is keen to hear back from as many East Devon residents as possible. This consultation will help inform decision making regarding where and how council services are delivered following the move to Honiton and Exmouth.

As part of the consultation process, 3,000 households throughout East Devon were recently selected to receive a copy of the Moving and Improving consultation questionnaire in the post.

However, the consultation is also open to all other East Devon residents, who can have their say by going online and completing the questionnaire at:

http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/consultation-and-surveys/moving-and-improving

Residents participating in the consultation can enter a prize draw for vouchers worth £100 and can also sign up to receive the results.

A separate consultation questionnaire is also being sent to town and parish councillors, representatives of voluntary and community groups, and representatives of local businesses, as their opinion is also valued and will help inform the way council services are delivered.

The closing date for the Moving and Improving consultation is Thursday 12 November 2015.

Commenting on the consultation, Councillor Paul Diviani, Leader of East Devon District Council, said: “As a public authority, it is our duty to make sure that everyone can access the services they need and that our services represent great value.

“The council offices are old, expensive to run and need ongoing repairs. The public spaces are not very welcoming and the offices are not fit for purpose for a modern 21st century organisation such as ours. Quite simply, moving is a cheaper option for East Devon than staying put.

“Our vision for service delivery is that you will be able to do business with the council when, where and how you want to. This means that not only will we operate from offices in Honiton and Exmouth, but we will continue to have a presence in main towns through surgeries and we will continue to develop better online self service options for you.

“It’s really important that you have your say about how and where you want our services to be delivered in the future, as this will help us decide how to provide our services when we move.”

Contact details below are for media only and not for publication
For more information, contact:
Richenda Oldham, Communications Officer 01395 517559, ROldham@eastdevon.gov.uk”

The Skypark debacle: a bit more information

Why is officer time NEVER costed?
How come the developer didn’t know the implication of EU regulations from the start?

these, and many other questions, remain a mystery:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/relocation_to_skypark#comment-63210

Remaining Knowle parkland to be sold to Sidmouth Town Council for £1

All well and good talking about restrictive covenants but they were not much use in Exmouth when East Devon District Council bought out restrictive covenants which were owned by Clinton Devon Estates which would have held up developments.

And if some parkland is used for parking as mentioned in the article, what is to stop Pegasus using it as an overflow car park for their luxury retirement complex?

Many questions still to be answered.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/covenant_to_protect_future_of_knowle_park_1_4238238

Did Claire Wright have a crystal ball when speaking about Cranbrook and the ‘Growth Point’ in 2012?

Here are a few comments she made at that time when she and other councillors visited the Growth Point on 11 May 2012l:

“I asked how many companies had bought space at Skypark.

Answer: None.

And Skypark has been marketed for well over a year.

I remembered the stark warning given by consultants, Roger Tym, who state on page 75 of their Housing and Employment Study 2011, that marketing for a 1.4m sq ft scheme at Langage Business Park in Plymouth has progressed over the last five years without success of obtaining a single occupier.

It is the challenge of dealing with large strategic allocations, they say.

Hopefully, Skypark will achieve full occupation in time. But it does rather put the challenge of filling the many and large industrial allocations for the rest of East Devon, into perspective.

If Skypark, in a hugely convenient location is not proving a goer (so far), what hope is there for almost 50 acres of industrial land allocated for Honiton?”

Recall that Asda pulled out of Heathpark and now EDDC is plugging the gap by moving there itself at enormous cost. Skypark is still mostly empty with its owners having gone on record to say it could take many, many years to rent it all out.

And, having just returned from a visit to Cranbrook on the same day, she wrote:

When I got home I couldn’t help wondering whether:

– the Skypark would ever get off the ground, or instead would mirror the non-progress of Langage Business Park in Plymouth

– the Science Park would ever consist of any more than Exeter University’s Innovation Centre

– If the inhabitants of Rockbeare would be swallowed up by Cranbrook, following a highly dubious decision, backed by the majority of the Local Plan Panel (not me) and Development Management Committee, to allocate south of the A30 for future expansion, despite a promise that this would not happen

– the public would ever consider the millions of pounds of public money ploughed into ‘growth point’ and Cranbrook, as money well spent.

– What sort of town Cranbrook would become. How big would it grow? Would I enjoy visiting it?

I have no answers to these questions yet. No one does. Only time will tell.

I have to say I am already rather tired of the pictures in local papers of grinning councillor and developer faces at turf cuts, of the continual talk of ‘great excitement’ and the oft heard promises of thousands of jobs and creation of wealth, none of which has materialised yet… and may not ever do so.

That said, I genuinely hope that ‘growth point’ and Cranbrook are huge successes.

Mainly because any other outcome would be a staggering waste of public funding, not to mention an irreplaceable loss of beautiful countryside.”

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/an_honest_look_at_cranbrook_and_growth_point

Relocation problems start to emerge …

… and probably the first of many.

image

Rumours abound, too, that costs are already spiralling out of control.

Is that why assets are being disposed of – a fire sale to cover a funding black hole?

And all our CEO can offer is a trite “Where there’s a will there’s a way”!

ICO tells Olympic legacy body to disclose details of deal with West Ham

Yet another decision that strengthens the public’s right to see information about deals that are kept secret due to “commercial confidentiality”. This decision makes it clear that, in just about all circumstances, this excuse will not wash. ALL details must be disclosed that do not reveal a particular business model.

Oh, oh Pegasus … looks like your deal might be one of those that has to be published in the public domain …

“The Commissioner noted that the arguments underpinning both the LLDC’s and the football club’s position were that disclosure would reveal elements of a business strategy which could be exploited by competitors.
The Commissioner said he acknowledged that the agreement included specific details of the terms on which West Ham used the Olympic Stadium and the obligations placed on the club based on its performance. He also accepted that at the time of the request contracts relating to some of the services provided by the stadium had still to be negotiated.
However, the Commissioner said the LLDC and West Ham had failed to demonstrate the specific way that the information at issue could be exploited by a competitor and, or how disclosure would place either party at a commercial disadvantage.
“In coming to this view, the Commissioner does not dispute that WHUFC operates in a highly competitive field. Yet, the Commissioner also considers that the terms of the Agreement that have been requested do not drill down to the specific business model adopted by WHUFC,” he said.

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24419:ico-tells-olympic-legacy-body-to-disclose-details-of-deal-with-west-ham&catid=53&Itemid=21

“You won’t stop sale of Knowle” says Cohen

According to last week’s Sidmouth Herald, Mr Cohen (he of the says that even if the bid ends up in court it will not hinder his relocation plans. Oh, and by YOU he means us, those residents of East Devon who have the temerity to challenge him.

image

This is the man of whom the Information Commissioner wrote on 5 May 2015 verbatim):

This Tribunal takes the unusual and unfortunate step of commenting on the conduct of the appeal itself. We are unanimous in our view that this appeal has taken much longer than it should have done and the reason for this seems to be
the failure on the part of the public authority, the appellant, to address itself with sufficient attention to the details of what information and documents it was supplying to the Commissioner and ultimately also to the Tribunal. It was not until March 2015 that a fully legible copy of the disputed information was supplied and seemed to be complete. This is, in our collective experience, wholly exceptional and the time spent dealing with what we believe to be five different sets of disputed information is simply not a good use of the Tribunal’s time nor fair, in terms
of delay, to the requester. Correspondence on behalf of the Council, rather than ensuring the Tribunal was assisted in its function, was at times discourteous and unhelpful including the statement that we had the most legible copies possible. A statement, which was clearly inaccurate as subsequently, we have been provided with perfectly legible documents. We believe this appeal could and should have been dealt with completely at the hearing in August 2014 and the
decision promulgated six months ago had the Council discharged its responsibilities properly.”

Now he appears to imply that he is above the law and that he can influence things in many ways if he feels like it. Hhmmm.

Black is white and white is black: Hugo Swire changes his tune on Knowle

MP Hugo Swire seems to have forgotten his own pre-election advice that there were “more intelligent ways of using Knowle”, and that it was “prudent” to “put Knowle relocation on hold”. At yesterday’s poorly-attended tea and talk meeting in Sidmouth, he apparently told some attendees that the Knowle protest was just “a parochial matter”.

Some former Sidmouth District and Town councillors, who recently lost their seats, were amongst the few people present at All Saints’ Hall. They must be glad of his change of mind.

Some history: https://eastdevonwatch.org/2015/01/03/another-split-amongst-east-devon-tories/

http://saveoursidmouth.com/2014/12/30/leader-paul-diviani-rejects-mps-call-to-put-knowle-relocation-project-on-hold-save-our-sidmouth-responds/

http://saveoursidmouth.com/2012/11/05/hugo-swire-has-asked-secretary-of-state-for-knowle-call-in/

Cabinet agenda 9 September: informationon on relocation arrangements

Click to access combinedcabinetagenda90915public-version.pdf

A must read for information on effects on Sidmouth, Exmouth and Honiton

Anyone up for another Freedom of Information fight?

The post below, with its mention of Skypark, got the Owl thinking… never a good thing.

Is it time someone asked for the information about WHY EDDC chose Skypark as the site for its new HQ and then returned to its original decision? It won’t come voluntarily though, Owl thinks.

There can’t be much “commercial sensitivity” now that it has fallen through and what little there is (if any) should be easily redacted.

A few questions spring to mind – maybe you have more.

Who suggested Skypark?
When?
Why?
What was the financial thinking behind it?
What interventions did other partners (DCC, St Modwyn) institute?
What correspondence did EDDC enter into and with whom about its decision to change to Skypark?
Why did they pull out so suddenly?
Why did the plans fall foul of EU directives, who noticed that and when?
How much was spent on the abortive project?

Owl thinks we should be told.

If only …

Exeter City Council is installing solar panels on its south-facing car park roofs and other buildings, including the museum:

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Exeter-firm-SunGift-Energy-UK-install-panels/story-27671895-detail/story.html

Imagine if there had been solar panels on the Knowle and other EDDC buildings for the last few years perhaps they could have put the income towards offsetting maintenance costs … and no need to move … no, of course it would never have happened! The siren sounds of Skypark and Honiton called instead.