Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 2 May

Comment on Police handling of Humphreys’ police bail condition

Owl believes this comment posted by “Tim” on the recent post: Exmouth journal prints “no comment” photos, deserves a post in its own right. 

From “Tim”

This extract on what the police can do with police bail (rather than court bail) is relevant and fits in with my own recollections but comes from the authoritative website of slaterheelis: https://www.slaterheelis.co.uk/crime-category/private-crime/bail-what-is-it/

Quote:

Police can, however, impose certain conditions on the bail.

“Bail Conditions

If a suspect is released on bail before they are charged, the police may restrict what they can do.

For example, if a person is being investigated for assault, the police may enforce restrictions stopping them from interfering with the victim. Similarly, if the investigations involve crimes against children, the suspect may be restricted from being alone with children under the age of 18 or entering a specified radius from schools and nurseries.

Another example would be investigations of repeated theft in a shopping centre. The suspect may be restricted from entering this area. If such conditions are breached, the police have the power to arrest the suspect.”

End quote.

Thus it is rather surprising to see evidence of Humphreys apparently carrying on his ‘normal’ business whilst on police bail. I remain very concerned about many aspects that his victim mentioned, not least the allegations of threats from certain unnamed police officers as to the wisdom of not upsetting powerful people.

I find it very difficult to understand why Humphreys would have been released (on what was known as S.43 bail in my day) without conditions. He faced serious allegations and frankly , as well as protecting the public, it would be in the self-interests of the police to have bail conditions restricting his opportunities for repeat offences.

The crowd at the college must be very pleased with themselves and their selection of Mr Jupp. For all his supposed local connections it was an unfortunate choice to be left with opting for an offer of accommodation from Humphreys. Where were the family with these strong local connections?

MPs tuck into 69p coffees and £1.70 sandwiches in subsidised Commons catering

Tory Lee Anderson, who criticised strugglers and questioned the need for foodbanks, can join his fellow MPs enjoying cheap food and drink as a perk on top of their £84,144 salaries. (up 2.7%)

Read full article www.mirror.co.uk

MP Neil Parish will ‘have nightmares’ over porn scandal

“Part of me has always wanted to be independent, and I’ve been quite an independent Conservative.”

Sweet dreams! – Owl

Lewis Clarke www.devonlive.com

Former Tiverton & Honiton MP Neil Parish, who quit after being caught watching pornography in the House of Commons, has told Devon Live that he will ‘probably have nightmares’ for the rest of his life. Mr Parish said in the two weeks since his resignation, he has been thinking about the ‘sheer madness’ of what he did and apologised again to his wife, who was ‘picking up the pieces’.

He admitted he had twice watched porn on the Commons benches. The 66-year-old, a farmer by trade, claimed the first time was accidental after looking at tractors online, but the second was “a moment of madness”. He spoke about his achievements over the 12-years he has been an MP, what it is like to be thrust into the national spotlight and his hopes for the constituency’s future.

He said: “I want to thank everybody for the tremendous support I’ve had in this constituency and how much of an honour it has been to represent Tiverton & Honiton for 12 years. For me, the highlights of being a member of Parliament for the area has been finally to get Cullompton Railway Station plans going when I thought for a long time it would probably never happen.

“There’s still the fight to get Tiverton High School, and I wish my successor all the very best to try and get that. Bypasses are needed in Cullompton and Axminster. We need to fight for our community hospitals at Seaton, Axminster, Honiton and Tiverton; we must ensure all these facilities are maintained. I shall look forward to watching what happens in the future.

“I hope the next candidate will fight for a new school for Tiverton as a top priority. Then, as I said, we need these bypasses and others. But if there were one thing I would say to my party, a new school for Tiverton is necessary. It would do the town a great deal of good and help raise aspirations in Tiverton. We need better education, and we need more aspiration.”

He continued: “I have worked very hard in this constituency, and I have had great support from councillors, activists and parish councils. All sorts of people have supported me, and I have enjoyed it. Of course, I have also had a great deal of support from the farming community, which I have represented extremely well in Parliament, if I do say it myself, as chair of the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs select committee.”

In an interview with the Telegraph last week, Mr Parish said he was considering standing as an independent candidate in the forthcoming by-election, of which the date is yet to be announced.

“What I want to see my own party make sure that they bring in a good local candidate, which will be good in Parliament and the constituency. Being a constituency MP is hard work, and it should be, so I don’t want just anybody foisted upon us. I haven’t made up my mind one way or the other,” he added. “I’m still taking soundings.

“I do not want to upset all the people that have been so loyal to me in my own party. If I did stand, it wouldn’t be for any other party; it would be an independent. Part of me has always wanted to be independent, and I’ve been quite an independent Conservative. The trouble is, if I was trading on the stock exchange now, I think my value would be quite low because of my actions, and I apologise again for them. That’s why probably I won’t stand, but I don’t rule anything out at this stage.”

He continued to say he will miss meeting people and being part of the community of Tiverton & Honiton now he is no longer an MP. “We’ve had some good fun over the years,” he said. “I remember The Tiverton Gazette photographed quite a large Neil Parish going down an inflatable slide and all sorts of other things.

“I’ve never been a pompous MP. I’ve always rolled up my sleeves, and we’ve had lots of good fun, and I shall miss the camaraderie. I am coming up to retirement age, I’ve probably retired a little sooner than I was expecting, but I did enjoy it. I enjoyed Parliament and notably chairing the select committee. I shall miss my friends in Parliament; we had plenty of banter.

“Of course, the ridiculous part with me is that I have blotted my copybook so terribly but behaved very well in Parliament generally. I am sure the national press were doing their best to find somebody to have a story on me, but I don’t think they could find them.”

On being the focus of a national scandal, he added: “I suppose I shall have nightmares for the rest of my life because, my God, is it something. For all my faults and sins, I managed to hold onto my temper. I made a mistake, but my goodness me, the national press are like nobody else you’ve ever come across. They’ve got a job to do, but I think it’s pretty harsh. You are, however, in politics; you put your head above the parapet, you make a mistake, and you pay the price.”

He discussed his plans for the future, adding: “I intend to build up some more farming and probably look at one or two other little business projects. That’s very much in my own gift to go on and do those. I would still like to put the knowledge I’ve gained, especially in the food, farming and environmental side, to good use.

“I also would like to work with the Farm Crisis Network charities. We had just been finishing, when I was previously the chair of the select committee, an inquiry on farmers’ mental health. The Farm Crisis Network rang me on Sunday evening when this was happening to check how I was. I very much thank them for that because one is not at one’s best place at that time.

He added: “What I would say to my national party is that whatever mistakes an MP makes, you need to try and give them a little bit of help in a crisis, not just leave them to it. I drove to Plymouth to resign, and it was all fine with Martyn Oates and my BBC interview, but it could have been very different.

“I’m not saying I would do anything stupid because I’m not like that, but I think they need to care for you a little better in a crisis. Not just looking at me as a very hot potato and hoping I’d just disappear.”

On the candidate he would like to see replace him, he said: “I am still a member of the Conservative Party. I hope to remain that. My message to voters is to be very careful. Look at the candidates, and all being well, the Conservatives will put up a good local candidate. I would ask voters to give that due consideration, and hopefully, they can still vote Conservative. I have represented them well in the past, and I hope the new representative and the Conservative Party will do the same.”

Calling all tractor enthusiasts! Conservatives desperate for a candidate to beat the LibDems in Tiverton and Honiton…

Not much time left for Tories to apply to try to fill Neil Parish’s boots – Owl

Anthea Simmons westcountryvoices.co.uk 

Well, well! The ConservativeHome website makes for a fascinating visit. It seems applications are now open for a candidate to replace disgraced former MP for Tiverton and Honiton, Neil Parish, in the upcoming by-election. Anyone interested in standing needs to apply by 18 May.

William Atkinson, the site’s assistant editor, writes:

“Though traditionally safe, the voters of Tiverton and Honiton are apparently not best pleased with Government at the moment. Anyone wishing to prevent a Lib Dem victory, please apply – even if you are in the House of Lords.”

The HoL hint has prompted comments from readers of the post to exhort Lord Frost, the man who has forgotten that he ‘negotiated’ the oven-ready Brexit deal (albeit without ever reading or understanding the ingredients list) to stand in this assumed-to-be-safe safe. But it also elicited this insightful response from someone not so enamoured of the amnesiac Lord:

“This man, responsible for the impasse and present blockage in Northern Ireland, willingly accepted a peerage to become a member of The House of Lords. It would surely be the height of cynicism and political manipulative opportunism if he was now allowed to renounce this to again become a commoner. It is these types of manipulations and skullduggery which have led all those in public life in general, and the Conservative Party under its present leadership in particular, to be held in such contempt by the general population.”

Well said, sir!

The Frost fans will have none of it. Frostie is apparently well within his rights to renounce and stand, especially as he is seen as someone to get the party back on track with its agenda of alienating allies and destroying the Union.

The fly in the ointment is that Neil Parish allegedly intends to stand again himself – as an independent. As one justifiably cynical observer points out, were he to win, Johnson would probably have no scruple or hesitation in re-admitting him to the Tory fold.

It would be nice to think that Mr Parish would keep dishing it to the government on its execrable trade deals and betrayal of farmers and fishers, not to mention its careless disregard for food and animal welfare standards IF, and it’s a big if, he were to hang on to his seat. It might have been Mr Parish’s dogged arsiness and refusal to drink the Brexit Kool-aid that did for him in the first place and we’re told that Johnson never forgives – which is mighty strange since he very often (conveniently) forgets…!

What larks!

#ProgressiveAlliance #ElectoralReform #MakeVotesMatter

Lib Dems ‘already campaigning’ for Tiverton and Honiton byelection

The Liberal Democrats have already begun campaigning for the Tiverton and Honiton byelection before its date has even been set, Ed Davey has said, calling his party “an anti-Tory campaigning machine” which is key to removing Boris Johnson from power.

Peter Walker www.theguardian.com 

Winning the Devon seat vacated by the long-serving Tory Neil Parish, who resigned for watching pornography in the Commons, would be another huge coup for the Lib Dems.

Davey said that, while taking the seat would be a huge task, the Lib Dems’ success in last year’s North Shropshire byelection – another rural seat formerly held by a disgraced Tory – showed it was possible.

A further boost came in the local elections where, among the near-200 seats gained by the Lib Dems, they took control of Somerset council from the Conservatives, indicating the party is making a resurgence in its former stronghold of south-west England.

At the next general election, Davey said, the fact that his party was competitive in Conservative-held areas, many in the so-called blue wall of commuter belt seats, meant they would be at the centre of any electoral path which saw Johnson lose office.

“I can’t remember a time when the Liberal Democrats were more important to getting the Tories out of power,” he said. “We’re on the march. We are scaling that blue wall. My sense is we’ve got real momentum now.”

He added: “In the seats where we have a good chance of winning next time, they’re almost all held by the Tories. We are becoming an anti-Tory campaigning machine.”

Tiverton and Honiton will be another major test. While the wins in North Shropshire and, earlier in 2021, Chesham and Amersham, have made the Lib Dems the immediate bookmakers’ favourites, they came a distant third in the seat in the last two general elections.

Lib Dem activists are already in the constituency, knocking on doors, with Davey likely to join them this week. Campaigning will focus on ultra-local issues such as ambulance waiting times and GP numbers.

“We’re definitely the challengers,” Davey said. “And after North Shropshire we’ve proved that in these sorts of rural communities we’re the ones people will turn to.”

“But it’s a bigger mountain than North Shropshire, actually. It’s a tougher gig. We’ve got the Somerset result on our side, so we’re going to give it a good fight. But the Tories will know that we’re on their case,” he added.

One advantage for Davey could be if, as he mooted last week, Parish stands as an independent candidate, thus splitting any Tory vote.

An arguably even greater factor is the unspoken decision by Labour to most likely devote minimal resources to Tiverton, instead focusing on the Wakefield byelection, which comes after the Tory MP Imran Ahmad Khan was convicted of sexual assault.

Davey dismisses the idea of a pact between his party and Labour, a theory already raised by the Conservatives.

“It’s what I call rational behaviour. You don’t throw money or resources into seats where you’ve not got much chance of winning,” he said.

“I certainly think that voters are very focused on getting rid of the Tories. They can just read the numbers. Increasingly, you knock on the doors of people who would otherwise vote Labour or Green and they’re saying, ‘Yes, of course we’re going to vote for you.’”

The Lib Dems are also seeing increasing numbers of more liberal Conservatives turn to them, something Davey acknowledges comes from both his party’s efforts and, more significantly, an increasing distaste for Johnson after the mass of fines for illegal parties in Downing Street.

“If I was the Tories, this is what I’d be most worried about,” Davey said. “The voters have just woken up. In North Shropshire and Somerset they didn’t need persuading. And I don’t think in Devon they’ll need persuading. They know that to get rid of the Tories, you get behind the Liberal Democrats.”

Many such people, Davey says, are “embarrassed” to have Johnson as PM: “They’re patriots and they want their prime minister to be someone they can respect.

“I’ve respected prime ministers of all political persuasions. I might disagree with them, but I didn’t think they were putting their own personal and party interest, always and everywhere, above the national interest. I think we have a prime minister who doesn’t care about the national interest. I think people are seeing through that, and they don’t like it.”

Michael Gove ‘tells Lords they should sit outside London during refurbishment’

Southwest loses out again. – Owl

www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk 

The House of Lords should relocate outside of London rather than moving to a building nearby during refurbishment works, Michael Gove has reportedly told the Lord Speaker.

The Levelling Up Secretary is said to have written to Lord McFall of Alcluith suggesting locations including Stoke-on-Trent, Burnley and Sunderland.

In the letter, reported in the Sunday Times, Mr Gove said he knows “cities and towns across the United Kingdom would be pleased to extend their hospitality to peers”.

He is quoted as saying that having “carefully reviewed the proposed arrangements”, he “will not support the use of the QEII Centre as an alternative location”.

The Queen Elizabeth II Centre conference and exhibition space is just a few minutes’ walk from the Palace of Westminster in London.

In the letter, which the Sunday Times said was also sent to Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Cabinet Secretary Simon Case, Mr Gove suggested a move elsewhere in England, Scotland or Wales.

He is reported to have written: “As the minister responsible for levelling up, it is clear to me that the House of Lords moving elsewhere, even for a temporary period, would be widely welcomed.

“I have carefully reviewed the proposed arrangements and… I will not support the use of the QEII Centre as an alternative location.

“I propose to establish dedicated liaison points for you in my department to support you in identifying a suitable location for the House of Lords in the North, Midlands, South West, Scotland or Wales. I would, of course, be happy to meet you to discuss this.”

A spokesperson for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities declined to comment.

Earlier this year, a report showed that restoring the Palace of Westminster without finding a new home for MPs could take up to 76 years, with a repairs bill reaching £22 billion.

The project’s sponsor body and delivery authority said the cheapest option would involve a “full decant” of the palace for between 12 and 20 years, with the work costing in the region of £7 billion to £13 billion.

In this scenario, with MPs elsewhere for much of the time, the report estimated the restoration would take between 19 and 28 years.

A House of Lords spokesperson said: “The Lord Speaker has just received this letter from the Secretary of State. We will respond to it in due course.

“In March the House of Lords and House of Commons Commissions reaffirmed their united commitment to preserve the Palace of Westminster for future generations.

“Both Commissions will meet in June to consider future arrangements for the restoration and renewal programme and proposals will then be put to both Houses of Parliament. This process will set the way ahead.

“Any decision about whether and where to relocate the House of Lords, whether on a permanent or temporary basis, is ultimately a matter for the House itself.”

Pressure grows on Labour and Lib Dems to agree joint anti-Tory strategy

The Lib Dem leader, Ed Davey, told the Observer on Saturday that his party would concentrate on the Devon seat of Tiverton and Honiton because it believes it can pull off a sensational win against the incumbent Conservatives in the south-west, where it has traditionally been strong.

Toby Helm www.theguardian.com 

The Liberal Democrats will put all their campaign efforts into only one of two crucial byelections this summer – leaving Labour to fight the Tories in the other – as pressure intensifies on leftwing parties to work more closely together to oust the Conservatives from power.

The Lib Dem leader, Ed Davey, told the Observer on Saturday that his party would concentrate on the Devon seat of Tiverton and Honiton because it believes it can pull off a sensational win against the incumbent Conservatives in the south-west, where it has traditionally been strong.

But with resources and money limited, the Lib Dems know they can maximise their chances there only if they limit help for their candidate in the other contest, in Wakefield, where Labour is the traditional incumbent but was pushed into second by the Tories at the 2019 general election.

The two byelections – caused by the resignations of Tory MPs Neil Parish and Imran Ahmad Khan over sex-related sleaze scandals – are likely to be held on the same day on a byelection “super Thursday” in late June or early July. The double election is seen as a potentially critical moment for Boris Johnson’s administration.

If the prime minister were to lose both it would be another blow to his chances of surviving in office, showcasing his vulnerability to twin Lib Dem and Labour recoveries in their respective heartlands, following the Partygate scandal and with a cost of living crisis raging.

Without mentioning the Wakefield contest, Davey said: “Political parties always put resources where they can win, so we will be working incredibly hard to take the fight to the Tories in Tiverton and Honiton.”

With Labour certain to do the reverse, prioritising Wakefield while backing off in Tiverton and Honiton, there is now a growing focus on how far the parties on the centre-left should go in terms of cooperating – whether it be informal “one-off” arrangements, or more organised pacts, in order to dislodge the Tories.

A special constituency-level MRP survey of 10,000 voters, commissioned and published on Sunday by the pressure group Best for Britain, has found that if Labour, the Lib Dems and Greens came to formal agreements not to fight each other in 119 English seats at the next general election, they would be able to form a coalition government without relying on MPs from the Scottish National party.

However, if such pacts only happened between parties on the right and no such arrangements were made on the left, then Labour would fall short of that majority and could govern only by relying on the SNP.

Ukip stood down in seats where it risked splitting the rightwing vote when Theresa May was prime minister in 2017, and the Brexit party stood down for Johnson in 2019.

If past behaviour is any indication, Reform UK, the successor to the Brexit party, is likely to stand down to help the Conservatives if a Labour-led government looks likely at the next election.

The Best for Britain polling found that if the 2017 and 2019 situation were to be repeated with no similar arrangement on the left, then Labour would win 307 seats, the Tories 261, SNP 52, the Lib Dems 7, Plaid Cymru 4 and the Greens 1. This would not be enough for Labour to govern without the SNP.

However, if Labour, the Lib Dems and the Greens were to play the rightwing parties at their own game, and agree to stand down candidates in order to maximise their chances of winning against the Tories, then Labour would win 323, the Tories 239, SNP 52, the Lib Dems 13, Plaid Cymru 4 and the Greens 1. Under this scenario Labour would be able to govern with the Lib Dems but without the SNP.

Naomi Smith, the CEO of Best for Britain, said: “To win, Labour needs to do what the Conservatives most fear them doing, and that’s working with the Lib Dems and the Greens at election time.

“The parties on the right stand down for each other to secure majority governments on a minority of the votes, and our data shows that the safest way for opposition parties to defeat this corrupt and failing government is to stand aside for one another in the seats they can’t win.

“We saw last week in the local elections that voters up and down the country are already collaborating to get rid of this government. Their party leaders need to catch up.”

Layla Moran, the Lib Dem MP for Oxford West and Abingdon, added: “In an election where the opposition vote is split, many voters will want to back the candidate who is most likely to win and deliver change. To this end we must be honest with each other about the situation in each constituency and ensure that the voters have the information they need to lock the Tories out of power.”

Caroline Lucas, the Green party MP for Brighton Pavilion, said: “This polling shows that in many constituencies, the Green party holds the key to beating the Conservatives, a point underlined by our strong performance in the recent local elections.”

Torbay Council Conservative leader ‘breached code of conduct’

The leader of the Conservatives at Torbay Council has been found to have brought the council into disrepute.

Does the Conservative sense of entitlement lie at the heart of these breaches of conduct? – Owl

www.bbc.co.uk 

David Thomas was also found by the council’s standards committee to have used his position as a councillor to improperly gain an advantage.

It comes after a procedural row during a meeting in September last year descended into disarray, with one clerk too upset to continue their duties.

Mr Thomas was told he must write an “unequivocal” apology to the clerk.

The incident happened during the opening meeting of the council’s housing crisis review panel, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.

An administrative error led to the panel being top heavy with Conservatives, not reflecting the political make-up of the council which is run by a coalition of Liberal Democrats and independents.

Fellow Tory councillor Hazel Foster, who was also found to have breached standards by bullying an officer, refused to accept a change that would have led to a more balanced panel.

An hour-long debate ensued and one clerk became visibly distressed and left the meeting.

On Friday, the standards committee found Mr Thomas had exacerbated problems and contributed to disorder at the meeting.

The standards committee deemed this was a breach of the council’s code of conduct as it brought the authority into disrepute.

Commenting on the accusation, Mr Thomas said: “I believe this meeting didn’t show [Torbay] council in the best of lights. It is certainly not the council’s finest hour.”

He said he honestly believed that when he spoke at the meeting he only did so to keep the meeting on track.

“I believe and I still believe there are lessons to be learned across the whole of that meeting,” Mr Thomas said.

In its conclusions, the standards committee recommended that training was provided to all councillors and relevant officers to prevent administrative confusion.

Watch: Reactions as PM dodges question on Russian money donated to Tory party

There has been another scandal involving Russian money allegedly flowing into the Tory party.

By AMERICAN EXPRESS www.thelondoneconomic.com 

In February 2018, a donation of $630,225 was made in the name of wealthy London art dealer Ehud Sheleg, who was most recently the treasurer of the UK Tory party.

However, an alert that was filed by Barclays bank last year with the National Crime agency – which has been seen by the New York Times – say that the money originated from the bank account of Sheleg’s father-in-law, Sergei Kopytov.

Kopytov is a former high-ranking pro-Kremlin Ukrainian politician who now owns hotels and real estate in Crimea and Russia.

Via a statement issued by Sheleg’s lawyer, Kopytov said he was a Ukrainian citizen and had not made any such donation.

He said: “I have no interest in British politics whatsoever.

“Any donations made by my son-in-law to a British political party have nothing to do with me or with the money I gifted to my daughter.”

Interview

Sky’s Sam Coates asked the PM about the breaking scandal.

He said: “What’s your response to allegations in the New York Times that the Conservative Party took donations from a donor with links to Russia & money linked to a Russian bank account?”

The PM gave a non-reply and eventually said: “You’ve got to be from the UK to give donations.”

Reactions

Go to www.thelondoneconomic.com to read more

Literally read the room! Fury as Tory council leader tucks into buffet at food bank opening

The image of Dartford’s Tory council leader grinning as he cut the ribbon to open a food bank has rightly sent people into orbit, as the pics emerged.

www.thelondoneconomic.com 

But now more details have been discovered about the buffet they had afterwards, more of this later.

As you can see from the tweet below the initial unveiling didn’t go down very well…

James O’Brien also tweeted: “WTF are they all so happy about?”

It comes a Conservative MP has been slammed for suggesting people in the UK use food banks because they “cannot cook properly” and “cannot budget”.

Ashfield MP, Lee Anderson, invited “everybody” on the opposition benches in the House of Commons to visit a food bank in Ashfield, Notts, where, when people come for a food parcel, they now need to register for a “budgeting course” and a “cooking course”.

He claimed food bank users in his constituency are shown how to cook meals for “about 30 pence a day”.

Buffet

Now another image has revealed the party went on to enjoy a buffet after the opening event – in the same church building where desperate families will queue for handouts.

The leader of the local Tory council, Jeremy Kite, was among those tucking into the food.

Pictures of the event were hastily deleted from his Facebook page once they were spotted.

Nicholas Hair, a Labour council candidate in Bexley, said: ‘Having worked with colleagues in Dartford, and seeing the destitution of up to two million people across this country right now, this was disgusting to see.

‘Food banks are not “heart warming”, they are evidence of a failure of government and of a society to seek social justice.’

Reactions

See them all on www.thelondoneconomic.com 

Sewage dumps into English rivers widespread, criminal inquiry suspects

A criminal investigation into water companies in England has uncovered suspected widespread illegal sewage discharges from treatment plants, the Environment Agency has revealed.

Remember “The tories just voted against an amendment to stop water companies dumping raw sewage into rivers” (Including Simon Jupp and Neil Parish) – Owl

www.theguardian.com 

The investigation into more than 2,200 water treatment plants run by all 10 water companies is examining whether the firms breached legal regulations about when and how frequently they are allowed to release raw sewage into waterways.

The EA said an initial examination of hundreds of documents from the water firms “confirmed that there may have been widespread and serious non-compliance with the relevant regulations”.

Breaching the legal regulations amounts to illegal dumping of raw sewage, and criminal penalties apply. Last year, Southern Water was fined a record £90m for illegally discharging billions of litres of raw sewage into coastal waters off Hampshire and Kent. The company argued in court that the discharges had not been deliberate, and said it was committed to transformation, transparency and cultural change.

The revelations came as members of the public, NGOs and charities rejected as too little and too late government plans to cut the scale of raw sewage discharges into rivers and seas.

Targets drawn up by government and put out to consultation include a requirement for water companies to reduce the frequency of discharges to bathing waters by 70% by 2035, or significantly reduce harmful pathogens they contain, for example by using ultraviolet radiation.

By 2040, 160,000 discharges of raw sewage through storm overflows into all waters should be eliminated, and by 2050 ministers are promising to eliminate approximately 320,000 discharges, about 80% of the total, into all waters.

The latest Environment Agency figures recorded the scale of raw sewage discharges from the 15,000 storm overflows in England in 2021 as 372,533 discharges for a combined total of more than 2.7m hours. In 2020, there were more than 400,000 sewage discharges, totalling more than 3m hours.

The majority, 55.2%, of the 18,268 people who responded to the consultation via 38 Degrees, a campaign group that regularly helps the public respond to government consultations, disagreed with the timescale and scope of the government’s targets. Questioned further, 83.9% said the timeframes being proposed by the government were much too long.

Matt Richards, campaign manager at 38 Degrees said: “The conclusion we can draw from this is that, regardless of people’s stated views of the proposed targets, the overwhelming majority want the government to move much quicker than they are currently proposing.”

Christine Colvin, of the Rivers Trust, said: “We think this plan gives us too little, too late. We need to see a broader scope that includes clear milestones for government as well as water companies, and much more urgency and ambition. We want to have healthy rivers fit for people and wildlife within the decade, not by 2050.”

Any release of raw sewage into rivers and coastal waters through storm overflows is supposed to take place only after exceptional weather and according to conditions in the permits issued by the EA.

Fish Legal, in its response to the consultation, also rejected the timeline and ministers’ proposed approach. It said the ambition to cut discharges into bathing waters was “extremely limited”.

The legal group also condemned the entire approach of the reduction plan. It said: “There appears to be an assumption running though this consultation that most storm overflows only happen due to excessive rainfall … The Environment Agency, as a regulator, also appear to have been working on that assumption … Our members and the public therefore do not share the Environment Agency’s confidence.

“The Environment Agency has previously taken a passive approach to regulating these discharges, relying on the water companies to collect and even analyse the relevant data. If nothing else, the current major investigation into water companies’ permit compliance is a tacit admission that operator self-monitoring and self-reporting – a situation whereby the water companies oversee their own works and report their own permit compliance – has not worked.”

A report by the environmental audit committee in January found that rivers were being subjected to a chemical cocktail of sewage, agricultural waste and plastic pollution.

Champagne bottle signed by Boris Johnson auctioned at charity event ‘as souvenir of Partygate’

A champagne bottle signed by Boris Johnson was auctioned off at a charity event “as a souvenir of partygate”.

Tories really are in a class of their own! – Owl

Chiara Giordano www.independent.co.uk

Food critic Jay Rayner tweeted an image showing a description of the bottle from what appeared to be the page of an auction catalogue.

Beneath the title “Bottle of champagne signed by Prime Minister Boris Johnson”, the description read: “A bottle of champagne signed by Boris. Hugely valuable as a souvenir of partygate and the exemplary behaviour and morality of our dear leader! Donated by: Oliver Dowden”.

Sharing the image on Twitter on Friday morning, Mr Rayner wrote: “Perhaps you thought the Conservative party took partygate seriously.

“Last night a champagne bottle signed by @BorisJohnson was donated to a charity event in Hertfordshire by local MP and Tory party chairman @OliverDowden. Read the description.”

Mr Dowden, who has been the MP for Hertsmere since 2015 and co-chairman of the Conservative Party since 2021, confirmed he donated the item – but had no knowledge of the description.

The MP’s spokesperson said: “This item was donated in good faith several months ago for a local charity auction.

“Oliver Dowden had no prior knowledge of the description and this is obviously not his view.”

The Metropolitan Police on Thursday announced the number of fines handed out to government staff for law-breaking parties held during the Covid-19 pandemic had doubled to more than 100.

Scotland Yard said last month that 50 referrals had been made to the criminal records office for fixed penalty notice (FPN) fines over parties in Downing Street and Whitehall when the country was under strict social-distancing rules.

In an update, the Met said its Operation Hillman team had now recommended 100 fines. The force said its investigation, into 12 separate events, remained ongoing.

Number 10 said Boris Johnson had not been issued with another fine, after he was punished last month over his rule-breaking birthday party in June 2020.

Slashing Civil Service jobs – the incoherence of slogan politics

Cutting civil service jobs is an old chestnut that plays well with the right wing.

Owl looks at three consequences of this proposed solution to the cost of living crisis that has emerged in place of an emergency budget from the Stoke-on-Trent awayday.

Depriving 91,000 (one in five) civil servants of their jobs, as we teeter on the brink of recession, seems a perverse way of dealing with the short term impact of the  cost of living crisis. It surely can only make matters worse.

The civil service has been increased to deal with Brexit. Reducing it  size will  inevitably reduce the services the government can deliver.  With 38 new bills announced in the Queen’s speech, what is the government now going to stop doing? Boris Johnson’s administration consistently falls short on delivery eg issuing visas to Ukrainian refugees. Its record on the value for money of contracting work out cronies isn’t too good either.

Civil service jobs are (or were until the cabinet went on its awayday brainstorming session) considered by the government to be so prestigious that a key part of the Levelling Up programme envisages moving 22,000 of them out of London. The recent Bloomberg analysis points this up as one of the consistent failings of Boris Johnson to meet his own levelling up targets. Only a couple of days ago Michael Gove gave us his views that arithmetical targets were not a thing of beauty.

Tiverton & Honiton: Voters in porn MP by-election desert Johnson’s Tories

Swing voters in Tiverton & Honiton have said that they will not vote for the Conservatives until the “lying buffoon” Boris Johnson has quit, boosting the Liberal Democrats’ hopes in an impending by-election.

[Neil’s comeback story continues across the press under various headlines eg. “Tractor pull the other one! Porn MP is eyeing up a comeback” www.thelondoneconomic.com]

Chris Smyth www.thetimes.co.uk 

A focus group for Times Radio found that voters in the Devon constituency who supported the Tories in the last election were swinging towards the Lib Dems as they lost faith in the prime minister.

Some said that they would never vote for the party until it had a different leader despite a lukewarm reception for Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer, who was described as bland.

The findings will boost Lib Dem hopes of overturning a 24,239 Tory majority in a by-election prompted by the resignation of Neil Parish, the MP who was caught watching pornography in the Commons.

While the voters were not enthused by Sir Ed Davey — with one describing him as the “British version of Biden, been around forever but known for not doing anything” — their hesitation about voting for his party has largely evaporated.

One voter, Andrew, who is retired, said that he had “begun to really not respect Boris. He’ll say anything and does very little to deliver”. Lucinda, a charity worker, said: “A lot of people have lost trust in Boris and the Conservatives — it’s just a bit of a mockery.”

James Johnson, Theresa May’s former pollster who ran the focus group for Kekst CNC, likened the issue of Downing Street parties to the Iraq war for Tony Blair, or Nick Clegg’s broken pledge on university tuition fees, in causing a permanent loss of trust.

The voters described the prime minister variously as a “lying buffoon”, “just an idiot”, a “selfish greedy man”, and a “self-promoting arsehole” and told him: “Do the right thing, resign, we don’t want to be led by a clown.”

They dismissed Johnson’s argument that he had got the “big calls right” as “smoke and mirrors”, describing him as an opportunist.

Four of the six voters opted for Starmer over Johnson, despite a lack of enthusiasm for the Labour leader. Starmer was described as “weak”, “boring” and “a bit like Theresa May”, although some voters contrasted his lack of charisma positively with “bombastic, buffoonish Boris”.

Almost all the voters described the cost-of-living crisis as the main issue in the forthcoming by-election, with some also mentioning GP appointments and local issues such as pot holes and new development. James Johnson argued that this meant “the issue agenda is stacked heavily in the Lib Dems’ favour”, adding: “the Lib Dems are seen as a ‘credible’ party, ‘the lesser of evils’ and a ‘happy medium’ to vote for. There was no mention of tuition fees.”

Read the full conversation by clicking on this tweet:

 

Breaking News: “Independent” candidate may enter Tiverton and Honiton by-election race!

‘Porn MP’ Neil Parish threatens to stand for re-election against Tory candidate

“I’ve got some sort of quite powerful backers within the farming community… If I stood, it wouldn’t be a problem in raising the money. The farming community realised how I fought their corner.”

Noon update according to Politico Newsletter: He’ll decide whether to stand on the eve of nominations closing! (Just to upset Tory High Command – Owl)

Will Taylor www.lbc.co.uk

“Porn MP” Neil Parish is weighing up standing for re-election and running against the Conservative Party candidate.

The politician resigned after he was caught watching porn twice in the House of Commons.

The ex-Tory MP became the focus of both outrage and ridicule when it emerged he had brazenly watched it in the chamber, causing female colleagues to complain.

Mr Parish later said he had accidentally viewed it in the first instance, while searching for tractors on his phone, before later accessing it deliberately.

He resigned his seat in Tiverton and Honiton in South West England after initially looking like he would try to fight on, and admitted he was a “f***ing idiot”.

But he is now considering running as an independent in the upcoming by-election triggered by his own resignation, pitting himself against any Tory candidate who stands.

“It is an option for me and one that I could consider,” he told the Telegraph.

“The only thing that may well stop me is the fact that my local party, my local activists, my local councillors, are friends. I don’t know if I want to do that to them.

“Some of the hierarchy of my own party, I suppose I wouldn’t have the same problem with doing it. At the moment, I’m taking soundings.”

He went on: “I’ve got some sort of quite powerful backers within the farming community… If I stood, it wouldn’t be a problem in raising the money. The farming community realised how I fought their corner.”

Mr Parish resigned after admitting his “moment of madness”, saying he was “not proud of what I was doing”.

He was reported as telling his wife he was sorry she “married a f***ing idiot”.

Mr Parish denied watching the porn in a way that he hoped others would see it, and added: “I make a full apology. A total full apology. It was not my intention to intimidate.”

The former chair of the Commons environment committee, who is passionate about rural issues, has said he will decide before nominations for the by-election close.

First elected in 2010, he won the Tiverton and Honiton seat in the 2019 general election with 35,893 votes, a 60% share and 24,239 votes ahead of his closest rival in the constituency, a Labour nominee.

Street votes on England planning rules ‘will not increase affordable housing’

Mini-referendums that allow homeowners in England to loosen planning rules and build bigger and taller extensions may do nothing to increase the supply of affordable housing, campaigners have said.

Better to take more notice of the Neighbourhood Plan process – Owl

Robert Booth www.theguardian.com 

“Street votes” have been included in the levelling up and regeneration bill as part of what the housing secretary, Michael Gove, has described as a way to boost democratic involvement in homebuilding.

But the countryside charity CPRE said the policy would allow homeowners to simply have more space and increase the value of their properties, making it harder still for first-time buyers to get on the property ladder.

“We don’t think it will provide any more affordable homes, [it] will make existing homes in urban areas less affordable, and there are no guarantees it will lead to more homes overall,” said Paul Miners, the group’s policy director.

The local votes are part of a new package of planning reforms unveiled after ministers scrapped an earlier attempt to allow property developers to build new estates without having to repeatedly apply for planning consent.

Officials said the votes would grant residents the right to allow the development or replacement of properties on their street within design rules and national policies. Development would only go ahead if the proposal is endorsed by a “supermajority” of residents at referendum.

“It has the scope to be very divisive in terms of neighbours,” said Peter Rainier, principal director of planning at law firm DMH Stallard.

The bill also includes a new requirement for community votes if a council wants to change a street name. Last year, Swanage town council in Dorset tried to change a street name from Darkie Lane but a public consultation found most residents wanted to keep it.

Successive governments have struggled to boost housebuilding to tackle the affordability crisis in the face of vociferous local opposition to greenfield development and rural sprawl.

The 2020 attempt to free up construction led to a backlash in the Conservative heartlands, and backbench MPs including Theresa May called the approach “ill-conceived”. The government is playing down the likelihood that it will hit a manifesto target of building 300,000 new homes a year by the mid-2020s.

Gove said on Wednesday: “Arithmetic is important but so is beauty, so is belonging, so is democracy, and so is making sure that we are building communities.

“People, when it comes to housing development, should be partners. We are going to do everything we can in order to ensure that more of the right homes are built in the right way in the right places. I think it is critically important that even as we seek to improve housing supply you also seek to build communities that people love and are proud of.”

Social housing landlords said any reforms should boost the delivery of affordable homes. Kate Henderson, the chief executive of the National Housing Federation, said planning changes should “deliver the number and type of affordable homes the country desperately needs”, citing 4.2 million people in need of social housing in England.

Gove’s predecessor as housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, said on Tuesday that the government would miss its manifesto target “by a country mile” and it could be years before the output hits even 250,000 a year again. He said: “We have to get those homes built because we are letting down hundreds of thousands of our fellow citizens. People are homeless today because we are failing to build those houses.”

On “street votes”, May warned parliament of “unintended consequences”. She said: “I can well imagine a situation in which somebody persuades their neighbours in a street to agree to the sort of development that might enhance the value of their houses but which actually has a negative impact on the wider community and wider neighbourhood.”

Street votes were proposed last year by the Policy Exchange thinktank, with the backing of several architects and planners associated with Prince Charles who have advocated for the “densification” of urban areas, in part to reduce pressure to build on open fields.

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday at 7am BST

The thinktank said: “Residents of a street should be able to agree by a high majority on new strict rules for designs to make better use of their plots. A street of suburban bungalows, for example, could agree on the right to create Georgian-style terraces. In many cases, an adopted ‘street plan’ would greatly increase the value of residents’ homes, giving them strong reasons to agree on it.”

It suggested redevelopment of listed and pre-1918 properties should be prohibited.

Another day, another 50 fixed penalty notices

Downing Street is the most fined address in the country for Covid breaches, according to the Telegraph headlines.

Seven occasions when Boris Johnson denied No 10 broke Covid rules

 Here are the moments Johnson denied rules were broken.

1 December – House of Commons

After the Mirror’s first story broke about Christmas parties in Downing Street:

“What I can tell the right hon and learned gentleman is that all guidance was followed completely in No 10.”

2 December – Sky News

Asked why he would not explain his account of the allegations, Johnson said:

“Because I have told you and what I want to repeat … that the guidance is there and I am very, very keen that people understand this.”

7 December – BBC News

When asked about Downing Street Parties in December, the prime minister said:

“All the guidelines were observed.”

8 December – House of Commons

After the Allegra Stratton video is released by ITV News:

“I apologise for the impression that has been given that staff in Downing Street take this less than seriously. I am sickened myself and furious about that, but I repeat what I have said to him: I have been repeatedly assured that the rules were not broken. I repeat that I have been repeatedly assured since these allegations emerged that there was no party and that no Covid rules were broken.”

8 December – Downing Street press conference

Asked why he had not extended the No10 inquiry:

“ … all the evidence I can see, people in this building have stayed within the rules … if that turns out not to be the case … and people wish to bring allegations to my attention or to the police … then of course there will be proper sanctions …”

Johnson giving a Downing Street press conference

13 December – Sky News

Asked again about Downing Street parties:

“I can tell you once again that I certainly broke no rules … all that is being looked into.”

20 December – BBC News

After the Guardian reveals pictures of people, including the prime minister, at No 10 drinks in the garden on 15 May 2020

“Those were people at work, talking about work. I have said what I have to say about that.”