Police not amused by Exmouth Mockingbird fans

Bird spotters who breached lockdown restrictions to catch a glimpse of a rare bird have been handed fines.

BBC News www.bbc.co.uk 

Northern mockingbird

The bird watchers travelled to see the rare Northern mockingbird in an Exmouth garden, image copyrightGetty Images

The Northern mockingbird, not often seen in the UK, was first spotted by Chris Biddle in his garden in Exmouth, Devon, on 6 February.

He tweeted about the sighting, prompting excitement among twitchers.

Five were fined for travelling to the town to photograph the bird after Devon and Cornwall Police were contacted on Saturday over the lockdown breaches.

In a statement, the force said: “It was reported that a number of individuals, suspected to have travelled from outside the area, were trying to photograph a rare bird which had been seen in a garden.”

The grey, long-tailed Northern mockingbird is known for its mimicking ability, and is found in southern Canada, across the US, Mexico and the Northern Caribbean.

It is not thought to have been seen in the UK since the 1980s.

‘Significant risk’ to beach users after storm exposes pipework

‘Significant risk’ to beach users after storm exposes pipework

Owl assumes everyone can guess what the purpose of the pipe was. Is it still operational as a storm overflow?

Charlotte Becquart www.devonlive.com

The recent weather and sea conditions have exposed old pipework on a Devon beach.

The picture above was taken at Exmouth beach, west of the lifeboat station.

It shows old broken pipework which is a significant risk to all beach users.

Exmouth RNLI shared the picture above to raise awareness. The team said the pipes could cause ‘serious injury’, especially during high tides.

It is urging people to avoid the area.

A spokesperson wrote on Facebook: “Fierce sea conditions have exposed some old broken pipework that is a significant risk to sea swimmers, kite surfers and other water users on Exmouth beach and could cause serious injury especially during high tides.

“The hazard is located about 80 yards west of Exmouth Lifeboat Station.

“Please avoid this area.”

Meadow-makers plan to get East Devon and the Blackdowns blooming and buzzing

Two new community groups for East Devon and the Blackdown Hills aim to support landowners and gardeners keen to restore or create wildflower meadows.

Obviously this is something Owl would encourage – the traditional manicured lawn is pretty much a wildlife desert, a wildflower patch doesn’t have to be big. Everyone with a garden can have one. Make this your spring project.

The local More Meadows groups are based on the successful Moor Meadows Dartmoor community, which since its founding in 2015 has grown to include more than 800 meadow-makers, managing more than 1,000 acres of wildflower meadow to benefit wild plants and wildlife on Dartmoor and beyond.

Thanks to funding from Devon Environment Foundation, the More Meadows concept is an attempt to replicate the original Moor Meadows groupโ€™s success by supporting new networks of meadow-makers across Devon.

The new More Meadows groups for the Blackdown Hills and East Devon have been founded by local nature enthusiasts concerned about ongoing wildlife declines but inspired by efforts to create more wildlife-friendly habitats.

Although lost from much of the countryside due to changes in agriculture during the 20th century, traditional wildflower-rich grassland can be maintained, restored or created on farmland, in gardens and churchyards and on road verges.

This conservation work can play a crucial role in turning around the fortunes of threatened bees, butterflies and other pollinators as well as the birds and mammals that rely on insects for food.

Helping to start the Blackdown Hills More Meadows group is Julian Pady of Goren Farm, at Stockland Hill, near Honiton. The wildflower meadows at Goren Farm already provide a commercial supply of wildflower seeds, with customers including many meadow-makers in Devon.

Julian Pady said: โ€Covid restrictions permitting, we will be opening our meadows from the 1st of May in conjunction with the National Gardens Scheme and we will be running open meadows events throughout June for meadow makers to attend. I will lead guided walks, talking about meadow management and demonstrating how we approach farming and wildlife on the 70 acres at Goren.โ€

Potential meadow-makers in East Devon joining the new More Meadows group also have an opportunity to help one of Englandโ€™s rarest animals. The grey long-eared bat preys on moths and other insects, so wildflower-rich meadows provide ideal foraging habitat. With two key maternity roosts located in East Devon, a new project led by East Devon AONB and Bat Conservation Trust is focused on securing the future for this rare species.

Leading the new bat project is Craig Dunton, who said: โ€If you are seeking support for meadow creation, this project will be providing land management advice to reconnect and restore wildflower meadows in the parishes of Colyford, Colyton, Musbury, Shute, Uplyme, Combepyne and Rousdon, Kilmington, Axminster and Hawkchurch. More meadows will mean more vital foraging habitat, helping to save the grey long-eared bat.โ€

An online forum for meadow makers launched last month to encourage the creation and spread of new More Meadows groups. Julien Pady of Goren Farm said: โ€œThe More Meadows forum is an amazing space, a valuable resource of information for all who join.โ€ The Blackdown Hills and East Devon groups are the latest to form and details of both groups can be found at http://forum.moremeadows.org.uk/ 

Supporting this process for More Meadows is Devon ecologist Tracey Hamston, who said: โ€œNew groups of local meadow enthusiasts are being formed as individuals reach out to other wildlife-friendly landowners in their area. The online forum is providing a network for people to find others living nearby, organise getting together and planning how to move forward, with the aim of creating and restoring as much species-rich meadow as possible and connecting to like-minded folk in the process.โ€

Joining the forum is free and offers resources and advice on managing a meadow – including where to source wildflower seeds or seed-rich โ€˜green hayโ€™ โ€“ while forum members can help identify the wild plants and creatures in field or garden meadows.

More Meadows also organises a series of free online talks by expert speakers, open to everyone. The next event, โ€˜How to Create a Meadowโ€™, is a guide on how to turn a field or paddock into a wildflower-rich meadow. Tickets for the online talk on Thursday 25 March are free but you must register a place at https://createameadow.eventbrite.co.uk 

For more information on More Meadows visit the forum at http://forum.moremeadows.org.uk/

small tortoiseshell

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 1 February

Remove the existing roof coverings from the area over the failed timber members, reconstruct the roof structure and reinforce with structural steel beams then re-thatch and put back existing slate tiles Open for comment icon

Lincombe Farm Sidbury Sidmouth EX10 0QE

Ref. No: 20/1736/LBC | Validated: Tue 02 Feb 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision

Despite the success of the vaccination rollout the consultancy gravy train continues

The consultancy gravy train shows no sign of stopping. The Department of Health awarded the multi-national professional services firm, Deloitte, a COVID-19 contract that could be worth almost ยฃ1 million a day without the contract ever going to tender.ย 

The deal, worth up to ยฃ145 million, was handed to Deloitte to โ€˜support testing for Covid 19โ€™ for just five months. Deloitte has been given at least 25 public sector COVID-19-contracts since the outbreak of the pandemic, of which contracts totalling ยฃ170 million were awarded without any competition.ย 

Not only did Government fail to advertise or put this huge contract out to tender, they didnโ€™t come clean about the enormous sum of public money handed to Deloitte until around the time the contract had ended. The contract started in September 2020 and was only made public by the Government in January 2021. It’s almost impossible to scrutinise contracts when Government routinely fails to publish the details within the legal timeframe.ย 

We do not believe the award of this contract worth up to ยฃ145 million was lawful. We are left with no option but to pursue transparency through the courts. We have taken the first step in legal proceedings.

Governmentโ€™s approach to procurement throughout this pandemic has been characterized by a repeated failure to follow its own rules. For the sake of the public purse, we will continue to push for proper governance.ย 

Thank you,ย 

Jolyon Maugham QC

Director of Good Law Project

UK vaccine rollout success built on NHS determination and military precision

Owlโ€™s view of the welcome success of the vaccine rollout is that it stands out as using โ€œin-houseโ€ expertise rather than consultancies such as Deloittes. If only the Government had taken a similar path earlier…….

Extracted from Sarah Neville and Helen Warrell in London February 12 2021 www.ft.com

…The UK had carried out more than 14m vaccinations by Friday morning and was fast approaching the target of inoculating the 14.6m most at risk from Covid-19 by the start of next week. Only Israel and the United Arab Emirates, among larger countries, have inoculated more per head of the population.

Global leadership is an unaccustomed status for a country with one of the highest rates of excess deaths in western Europe. Multiple missteps, such as the governmentโ€™s failure to deliver on a โ€œworld beatingโ€ test and trace system, have engendered cynicism about its handling of the pandemic.

The UKโ€™s achievements have come despite far more constrained vaccine supply than Israel, for example. This has ruled out a demand-led model in favour of a โ€œrisk pyramidโ€ laid down by government advisers, with the oldest immunised first alongside frontline health workers. 

Jeremy Hunt, UK health secretary until 2018, said Asia had provided inspiration. Having failed to learn from that regionโ€™s recent experience in tackling deadly diseases caused by other coronaviruses in the early part of the pandemic โ€” the UK halted community contact tracing, for example โ€” the opposite was true when it came to vaccination.

โ€œThe main difference is that we really did learn the lessons from Sars and Mers when it came to the importance of the vaccine,โ€ he said.

The Financial Times has spoken to more than a dozen people at the heart of the programme to discover the key decisions that were taken and examine whether the right lessons were learned from a litany of earlier failures.

Planning began long before it was clear whether any of the vaccines being developed at historic speed would win the approval of regulators. Back in the summer UK prime minister Boris Johnson put Sir Simon Stevens, head of the NHS in England, in charge of delivering the countryโ€™s biggest ever mass inoculation campaign.

The challenge was to avoid the problems that had befallen the highly centralised test and trace system, which was delivered by outsourcing companies and had largely ignored expertise on the ground.

Stevens chose a different approach. Rather than creating a new system, he used existing groups of GPs, known as primary care networks (PCNs), which each cover up to 50,000 patients, as his main conduit. Each had to commit to vaccinating for 12 hours a day, seven days a week.

In total, around 1,500 vaccination centres have been established in England, including some in football stadiums and other large venues, staffed by 30,000 NHS workers and as many as 100,000 volunteers.

Some decisions were devolved โ€” PCNs chose their own jabbing sites, for example โ€” but for others the NHSโ€™s ability to compel action through national edict proved effective.

When, several weeks into the rollout, ministers took the key decision, announced on December 30, to delay second doses to stretch supplies, Stevens, along with UK chief medical adviser Chris Whitty held a video call with hundreds of PCN leaders on a Sunday night to explain the new policy. The next week, second shots largely stopped โ€” a level of compliance a more fragmented health system would have struggled to secure.

Planning had moved into a higher gear in November. With regulatory approvals for at least one vaccine imminent, Emily Lawson, NHS chief commercial officer, selected by Stevens to run the programme, assembled military and private sector support.

Brigadier Phil Prosser, commander of the armyโ€™s 101 Logistic Brigade, was taking part in an exercise with more than 2,000 soldiers on Salisbury Plain when he got the call on November 11 instructing him to leave immediately to start work on vaccine delivery.

Five days later, he and 50 military logistics experts were installed at the NHS headquarters in Skipton House, south London, to help co-ordinate distribution and set up vaccination centres. 

Military specialists calculated the optimum location of centres to ensure every UK resident could access a jab within 10 miles of home, as ministers had promised. Security officials worked out how to safeguard shipments of vaccines from theft or attempts to disrupt the rollout. 

โ€œThereโ€™s no other supply chain thatโ€™s built like this,โ€ said Prosser. โ€œThis is the largest vaccination programme this country has ever run.โ€

Three weeks later, on December 8, the first cohort were inoculated.

For those at the sharp end, the day starts at 8am with a meeting chaired by Lawson, where the head of each delivery group โ€” GPs, hospitals and mass vaccination centres โ€” reports on progress and the logistics team briefs colleagues on vaccine stocks for the next three days.

Palantir, the US data analytics company which had also worked with Lawson previously on a mechanism for PPE delivery, was contracted in November to provide a vaccine supply database. 

โ€œThe issue essentially is how do you get it into the right arm in the right place,โ€ said Louis Mosley, head of Palantir UK, who works on the programme. โ€œYouโ€™ve got a huge number of logistical constraints, because the vaccine expiresโ€‰.โ€‰.โ€‰.โ€‰[and] you often donโ€™t know until the last minute how much youโ€™re going to get.โ€

Each vaccine centre set up outside GP practices or hospitals needs more than 400 items of equipment to function, from needles to fridges and resuscitation equipment. Palantirโ€™s system brings together warehouse inventories and information about patients and the readiness of trained staff. The database also keeps a running total of vaccinations to give the NHS instant progress reports. Palantir said it does not receive or hold identifiable patient data.

When it came to allocating the vaccine, the uniting principle has been to ensure equal access. Christina Pagel, professor of operational research at University College London, said that in Germany, by contrast, it is usually up to individuals to book an appointment once they are informed they are eligible. She said that sort of approach favoured the โ€œtech-savvyโ€ and made the process a โ€œbit of a lotteryโ€.

However, the scale of progress, and the political narrative ministers have woven around it, would by now look very different were it not for the decision to delay the second dose of the UKโ€™s two approved vaccines by up to three months.

Supplies of the vaccine stood at only half the volume needed to fully immunise the most vulnerable by mid-February, threatening to leave millions unprotected as troubling new variants spread.

That move sparked international criticism, including from Anthony Fauci, the US presidentโ€™s chief Covid-19 adviser. This week, however, the World Health Organization backed the approach with the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine โ€” one of the two used in the UK.

Mary Ramsay, head of immunisation at Public Health England, said the agency had originally discussed the importance of aligning the dosing intervals for the BioNTech/Pfizer and Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines, which were meant to be given respectively three and four weeks apart. โ€œOperationally it was felt it would be easier to stick to a single interval,โ€ she said. 

Then data came in from AstraZeneca showing the effectiveness of a single dose up to 12 weeks. Moreover, as more analysis came in from the Pfizer trials, following the vaccineโ€™s approval by regulators in early December, it reassured government advisers that it, too, was likely to be highly effective after the first dose โ€” although the US pharma group was insistent on sticking to the approved three week schedule.

Former UK prime minister Tony Blair, who was an early advocate of the delayed second dose strategy, praised the government for the rollout of the programme. โ€œI was sceptical as to whether the government would perform the logistics effectively enough butโ€‰.โ€‰.โ€‰. by and large, they have.โ€

While the numbers vaccinated point to a successful project, there have been inevitable bumps along the road. Some GPs have criticised the model through which vaccine supplies were โ€œpushedโ€ out to them, particularly those with low-income patients who tend to suffer poor health at younger ages…

Ex-Persimmon chief fails to set up charity three years on from bonus row

Beware the โ€œDeveloperโ€™s Pledgeโ€.

Perhaps the phrase deserves to be used more widely as a general description for a worthless promise. – Owl

Rupert Neate www.theguardian.com 

Jeff Fairburn, the former chief executive of the housebuilder Persimmon, has failed to set up a charity three years after pledging to do so in an attempt to assuage public and political anger at his ยฃ82m bonus.

Fairburn has not registered a charity with the Charity Commission or made any inquiries about how to set one up, after he said on 14 February 2018 he would donate a โ€œsubstantial proportionโ€ of his bonus to a charitable trust. The furore over the payout, believed to be one of the most generous in the FTSE 100 at the time, led to the chief executive losing his job later that year after the company said it was having a negative impact on the reputation of the business.

The controversial bonus payment resulted from a scheme linked to the housebuilderโ€™s share price, which soared thanks to the governmentโ€™s help-to-buy programme. About half of Persimmonโ€™s homes are bought with its assistance.

Fairburn is also not named as a trustee of any charity in England or Wales. It is not known whether he has donated to any separate existing charity. He did not respond to repeated requests for comment, nor did several of his colleagues at the housebuilding company.

The revelation that Fairburn appears not to have set up a foundation to donate any of his bonus comes days after his former company set aside ยฃ75m to pay for work needed to remove flammable cladding on its high-rise buildings following the Grenfell Tower fire. An independent review in 2019 had found that Persimmon had built homes so shoddily that it left its customers exposed to an โ€œintolerable riskโ€ in the event of fire.

Garry White, chief investment commentator at investment firm Charles Stanley, said: โ€œJeff Fairburn won the equivalent of an LTIP [long-term incentive plan] lottery. The ticket was handed to him by [former chancellor] George Osborne, but was bought for him by Britainโ€™s taxpayers.

โ€œAbout half the companyโ€™s houses are sold via the government-backed help-to-buy scheme and the debacle demonstrates why LTIPs are a poor way to reward company executives. Share price moves can be gamed by corporate action such as share buybacks and the imperfect system introduced by Persimmon has given the impression of corporate looting. All such schemes should have an upper limit.โ€

While Fairburn appears not to have set up the promised charity, he has re-entered the housebuilding market after buying a 50% stake in Yorkshire house builder Berkeley DeVeer and becoming its chief executive. In a press release announcing his investment in Berkeley DeVeer last year, Fairburn said: โ€œIโ€™m honoured to join the company as CEO, and to have become a significant investor.โ€

A Charity Commission spokeswoman said: โ€œWe have no record of a registered charity bearing Jeff Fairburnโ€™s name. Nor does it appear Mr Fairburn is a current trustee of an active charity. We canโ€™t categorically state that no charity has been registered that involves Mr Fairburn in some capacity. It would also not be possible for us to confirm whether or not any funds have been donated via another charity.โ€

Luke Hildyard, the executive director of the High Pay Centre thinktank, said: โ€œWhen this obviously excessive and unearned payment was first made, the promise that a substantial portion would be used to set up a charity enabled Persimmon to draw a line under the affair. So there is a moral onus on Fairburn to provide some transparency over the matter.

โ€œCharitable giving by the super-rich is claimed to be an example of the so-called โ€˜trickle-downโ€™ effect but as this case suggests, philanthropy can be highly whimsical, opaque and unaccountable. The benefits it provides for wider society are minimal compared to proper taxation of extreme wealth.โ€

Boris Johnsonโ€™s top aide Eddie Lister still on payroll of two developers

Do you ever wonder why โ€œdevelopmentโ€ always features so strongly in all Tory plans?

Developers are just never very far away. – Owl

Emanuele Midolo, Gabriel Pogrund www.thetimes.co.uk 

Boris Johnsonโ€™s closest adviser faced fresh conflict-of-interest allegations last night after it emerged that he has stayed on the payroll of two property developers during his time in Downing Street.

Lord Udny-Lister has served as the prime ministerโ€™s chief strategic adviser since 2019. No 10 announced last week that he would soon leave for a new role as Johnsonโ€™s special envoy for the Gulf, responsible for courting Middle Eastern investment. The announcement came days after we revealed that Lister had been paid by both the buyer and seller of the new site of the Chinese embassy while leading talks over the ยฃ255 million deal on behalf of the government.

Rachel Reeves, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, said: โ€œWe need urgent answers from the government on how theyโ€™ll deal with what appears to be a serious conflict of interest. This governmentโ€™s catalogue of cronyism grows every week. Yet they seem to feel no urgency in addressing these concerns. There needs to be more integrity at the heart of government.โ€

Lister has been on the highest salary band of any special adviser in government since December 2019, paid between ยฃ140,000 and ยฃ149,000 a year. Throughout that time, he has been a non-executive director of Stanhope, one of the largest private developers in the capital, whose ยฃ500 million redevelopment near East Croydon has been picked by the government as the location of a new civil service hub.

Lister is also a member of the strategic board of Delancey, a property company that has given ยฃ350,000 to the Conservative Party over the past decade. While at No 10 Lister invited its owner, Jamie Ritblat, to provide advice on the property market several times during lockdown.

No 10 said on Friday that Lister would report directly to Johnson in his new role in the Gulf. Neither Delancey nor Stanhope have interests in the region. But both have dealt with Middle Eastern states on flagship deals.

Delancey and the property arm of Qatarโ€™s sovereign wealth fund jointly bought the ยฃ557 million Olympic village, while Stanhope sold an office block near Kingโ€™s Cross to the Qatar royal family in 2015. The Gulf states remain among the most active investors in London property, and are expected to play an increasingly important role post-Brexit.

โ€œIโ€™m very pleased to be sending Lord Udny-Lister to work with our partners there,โ€ Johnson said. โ€œHis appointment marks my ambition to achieve a wholesale modernisation of our Gulf relationships, creating jobs and driving prosperity at home while delivering on our priorities and values overseas.โ€

Lister received a peerage last summer but at the time of publication his Lords register of interests was empty.

Downing Street refused to answer specific questions but a government spokesman said: โ€œMr Lister has at all times followed the Cabinet Officeโ€™s guidance and codes of conduct.โ€ Ritblatโ€™s conversations with Lister, when he advised on the property market, are understood to have taken place by phone. Asked if they were minuted, a government spokesman declined to comment.

Delancey said last week that Lister was not involved on behalf of the company in the sale of Royal Mint Court, which is to be redeveloped and serve as Chinaโ€™s new British embassy. The company said: โ€œDelancey is not aware of any past or existing conflict of interest by Lord Udny-Lister sitting on its advisory board.โ€

Stanhope said Listerโ€™s role was to ensure โ€œgood governance within the company and he has no involvement in any existing or past Stanhope projectsโ€.

Idyllic sea view village aims to ensure young can afford homes

Another neighbourhood plan seeks to control second homes – Owl

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com 

With outstanding sea views across Start Bay, and with the parish lying entirely within the South Devon Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Strete is one of the South Hamsโ€™ historic and picturesque villages.

The village, located five miles away from Dartmouth, sits atop the cliffs behind Pilchard Cove at the north end of Slapton Sands, and the heart of the village is a Conservation Area with several listed buildings.

The area is popular with holidaymakers and the local economy rests primarily on tourism and agriculture, but job opportunities are few and far between, and house prices are high which can make it hard for local people, especially the young, to afford to stay in the parish.

As a result, the villagers have put together a plan to address the issues and to involve the local community in making sure that change and development in future are for the good of the parish.

Strete Village Centre

Strete Village Centre

The neighbourhood plan for Strete, which is hoped to go before the parish in a referendum in May, aims to help deliver the local communityโ€™s aspirations and needs.

The vision for Strete is to grow slowly and sustainably so that its high coastal character, sea views and natural beauty are conserved and enhanced while meeting local needs and improving local services.

THE HISTORY OF STRETE

The first documentary mention of the place was as Streta in 1194, and the name derives from Old English Strวฃt , meaning a road or Roman road, as the village lies on an ancient trackway, but the name Strete appears to have first been documented in 1244. Formerly a part of the parish of Blackawton, Strete became a separate parish in 1881 when the Chapel of Ease (built in 1836) became the parish church of St Michael’s.

The ancient heart of the village is protected as a conservation area and the plan aims to safeguard its historic and architectural character for present and future generations

THE VISION FOR STRETE

The parish is home to about 400 people and the village still provides local facilities including a shop with a Post Office, a pub, a village hall, some public spaces and the parish church.

The area is popular with holidaymakers and the local economy rests primarily on tourism and agriculture, the plan says, adding that hob opportunities are few and house prices are high which can make it hard for local people, especially the young, to afford to stay in the parish.

The neighbourhood plan for Strete aims to help deliver the local communityโ€™s aspirations and needs. It has been produced by local volunteers, with the support of the Parish Council, based on the collective views of the people who live in Strete.

Strete: by Magnolia Cottage

Strete: by Magnolia Cottage (Image: Martin Bodman/Geograph)

The Strete Neighbourhood Plan aims to: protect the village from uncontrolled, large scale, or poorly placed development; allow for small scale development which is sympathetic to and will improve the look and feel of the village; take steps to give residents preferred access to many of the new homes; and give the village the potential to access funding to improve village facilities.

The vision for Strete is to grow slowly and sustainably so that its high coastal character, sea views and natural beauty are conserved and enhanced while meeting local needs and improving local services.โ€

The local community expects the plan to respect and protect the precious natural and historic environment, maintain and improve community facilities, services and infrastructure, and support existing and new business opportunities and tourism, in order to maintain and enhance the character and vitality of the village and parish, and allow sustainable development for natural growth to meet future local needs.

THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN

The plan aims to create a place where the following objectives are achieved

  • landscape character and the natural setting of the parish are maintained and enhanced, including the high coastal setting of the village, the outstanding sea views, woods and copses throughout the parish
  • the particular sensitivity and visual prominence of the landscape on the seaward side of the A379 is recognised and suitably protected
  • valued local green spaces are maintained and enhanced
  • local heritage is valued, conserved and enhanced, including local history, village form and character, architecture, footpaths and other important features, and new buildings are sympathetically designed
  • local tranquillity and dark skies are conserved
  • people are able to move more freely, safely and conveniently, with new and improved footpaths, particularly in the village;
  • local needs are met through small organic developments, in scale with the locality and allowing future generations to maintain the viability of local businesses, but without substantially altering local character
  • There is economical use of resources so that future generations are not left a legacy of pollution, financial or environmental debt, with steady progress towards zero carbon energy and water footprints
  • local services are maintained, enhanced and extended with improved public car parking close to the coast path in the village, public transport to nearby centres maintained and enhanced and improved Broadband and Mobile Phone coverage, both for individuals and for businesses;
  • community well-being is enhanced and there are growing opportunities for people of all ages to expand and develop themselves, including public buildings and spaces to gather, pursue shared interests and contribute to the life of the community.

The plan adds: โ€œThe coast and countryside in and around Strete is recognized for its high quality natural environment, and unspoiled natural beauty. It is well loved by residents and visitors alike.

โ€œBut insensitive development could damage it irreparably. The plan recognizes the local landscape as one of the parishโ€™s most precious assets and aims to protect it from harm.

โ€œDevelopment shall not harm, but maintain and enhance the landscape by having regard to the special qualities of the AONB in the area, safeguarding and enhancing local features that make a positive contribution to the landscape, particularly areas of green space, protecting the high coastal setting of the parish, and incorporating high quality landscaping, which retains existing features reinforces local landscape character, and provides mitigation from harm.

Pilchard Cove near Strete, Devon

โ€œDevelopment shall not harm but conserve and enhance designated and non-designated historic and heritage assets and their settings, both above and below ground, by having regard to national and local strategic policies for heritage and conservation.

โ€œStrete is notable for its rural tranquillity. Apart from traffic passing through on the A379 coast road there is little to disturb the peace. The parish is also sufficiently removed from light pollution that it affords good views of the night sky. Development shall be designed so that it will cause no undue noise or light pollution.โ€

SOUTH OF THE A379

The plan recognises the sensitivity of the environment in and around Strete, both natural and man-made, and that these two aspects combine to create a particularly sensitive landscape setting for the village.

As the views of Strete are framed by its coastal setting and the land lying on the southern side of the A379 coast road is particularly important in this respect, any development in that area should therefore pay special regard to the sensitivity of the location and its coastal landscape importance and development there shall not harm but must enhance that coastal setting

South West Coast Path above Landcombe Cove

South West Coast Path above Landcombe Cove (Image: Derek Harper/Geograph)

THE WESTERN AREA

The western parts of the village, along the A379 and western Hynetown Road, are predominantly characterised by detached dwellings built over the course of the twentieth century on single plots. That low density character is distinct from the rest of the village and the plan requires that any development should retain that character.

To protect the character of the area, proposals for residential development within this area should reflect the established low-density character

DEVELOPMENT

The availability of facilities and support services in and around Strete means that it is a sustainable location for small scale growth. While there are fewer than 300 homes across the parish with about 230 of those being in the village, development in scale with the village could help to meet local needs for affordable homes and some additional community infrastructure.

The plans outlines that some development is needed to help to sustain the community and meet local needs, but plan defines and shows the settlement boundary for the village within which suitable development will generally be acceptable.

Strete Church

Strete Church (Image: N Chadwick/Geograph)

Outside the village, development will be tightly controlled and only permissible where it is essential in order to meet agricultural, forestry or other small-scale needs which cannot be met within the village, it says.

The plan aims to control the scale and density of development so that it is in keeping with the parish and geared to meeting local housing needs, and development will be supported inside the settlement boundary, provided it is in conformity with relevant policies in the Development Plan, is of a scale and character with the site and surroundings and will cause no significant adverse impacts on the natural or historic environment, amenity, traffic, parking or safety.

Outside the settlement boundary, development will be strictly controlled and only permitted where it is in accordance with the Development Plan, can be delivered sustainably and requires a countryside location or will meet a proven local need which cannot be met inside the settlement boundary

As part of the plan making process a call for sites was issued late in 2016 and two possible sites for development were identified. The more suitable of these, at Cox’s Farm Fields, was proposed in the initial drafts of the plan, but no satisfactory way could be found to develop the site in keeping with local aspirations and constraints, and therefore allocating the land for development no longer features in the plan.

Housing development sites in Strete shall be limited to small sites to ensure that growth is at a scale in keeping with the special qualities of the village and the AONB and affordable homes for local people will be particularly welcomed, the plan says.

The parish of Strete

The parish of Strete

SECOND HOMES

The growth in the number of dwellings being used as second or holiday homes is having a significant impact on housing stock in the parish, the plan states, adding that in 2011 there were 50 second homes recorded but that had risen to 66 by 2016 – about 20 per cent of the local housing stock.

It adds: โ€œHouse prices have been pushed up such that local people, particularly first time buyers, are generally unable to compete in the market, and that trend is continuing. The plan addresses this by requiring that new housing be restricted to occupancy as a principal residence.โ€

Occupiers of homes with a principal residence condition will be required to keep proof that they are meeting the obligation or condition and to provide this if/when South Hams District Council requests this information, and proof of principal residence could include residents being registered on the local electoral register or being registered for and attending local services (such as healthcare, schools etc.).

LOCAL FACILITIES

Strete is a beautiful place to live with a good quality of life, but with relatively few local facilities. Those which do exist – particularly the village shop and the pub – are therefore especially precious and the plan aims to safeguard them for present and future generations, and their retention and prosperity are important to local well-being, the plan says.

New facilities that will support the local community and enhance their well-being will be welcomed and supported, particularly if they will bring improvements in car parking or open space provision.

The local green spaces in the plan – The Village Green, The Village Wood (Blackbird Wood) and The Village Play Park โ€“ will only see development on them permitted in very special circumstances.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

The Neighbourhood Plan was assessed by an Examiner at the end of 2020, and they have confirmed that, subject to the minor amendments being incorporated into the revised Plan, the Strete Neighbourhood Plan meets with the legislative and regulatory requirements and can proceed to referendum.

The plan will now forward to South Hams District Council, who at a forthcoming meeting, will be asked that the Examinerโ€™s recommendations on the plan be endorsed and that a โ€˜referendum versionโ€™ of the Plan should proceed to the referendum stage.

A referendum where all electors within the parish of Strete will be invited to vote on whether the neighbourhood plan will be used to make planning decisions in the parish.

If more than 50 per cent of those who vote say โ€˜yesโ€™, the neighbourhood plan will be made and will form part of the development plan for the South Hams, where it will carry full weight in the planning decision making process.

The earliest date on which the referendum can take is May 6, 2021, where it is expected that if the local elections go ahead as planned, as the Government has indicated, then the Neighbourhood Plan referendum would take place at the same time.

The’re obviously rattled already!

Devon Tories use postal vote applications to capture votersโ€™ data

seatonmatters.org 

Posted on February 11, 2021

While the Government refuses to hold the postal-vote-based election which would be safe in current pandemic conditions, Devon Conservatives have nevertheless been mailing out postal vote application forms to unsuspecting voters.

Whatโ€™s more, theyโ€™ve inserted a big black tick-box at the bottom of the official-looking form, so that they can harvest would-be postal votersโ€™ information for sending out further propaganda. The form comes with a SAE to send to the local Tories and a copy of their โ€˜planโ€™ for Devon.

I gather one of the recipients is making a complaint to the Information Commissioner.

If you want to get a postal vote, act now to download a form here or phone East Devon Electoral Services on 01395 517402. You must of course be on the electoral register before you can apply for a postal vote! If youโ€™re not on at your current address, you can apply online here.

Contradictory messages and muddled priorities from Government on Green Policies

While Neil Parish and his committee says the government must set tougher targets to lower air pollution if it hopes to reduce the health inequalities that have been laid bare by the coronavirus pandemic, the Government backtracks on other Green Policies.

For instance:

The much trumpeted ยฃ27bn roads plan is in doubt after  after documents showed the transport secretary, Grant Shapps, overrode official advice to review the policy on environmental grounds.

It has been a legal requirement to take into account the environmental impact of such projects since 2014. Shapps appears to have pressed ahead despite the advice of civil servants in his own department.

This is likely to be challenged legally.

Also:

Ministers are withdrawing hundreds of millions of pounds from a green home improvements scheme championed by Boris Johnson as a key element of the governmentโ€™s net zero strategy.

These two example are neatly put together in this extract from the print edition of an article yesterday by Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent, The Guardian

… the central point [is] that major infrastructure decisions must take account of the UK’s binding climate obligations was affirmed. Campaigners want to use the same argument to force a review of the government’s ยฃ2bn road-building scheme, which they say would bust the UK’s carbon target and is incompatible with the obligation to reach net zero emissions by 2050.

Mike Childs of Friends of the Earth said: “We need to see a conclusive end to the damaging fixation with new fossil fuel-heavy projects. It’s hypocritical having a government that is happy to talk the talk on climate change, but then spends billions of pounds on roads.”

โ€ฆโ€ฆ.Road-building pledges are a staple of governments to show business-friendly credentials through infrastructure that supposedly creates jobs and boosts enterprise, and this seems to be the current motivation. Yet ministers show little interest in other projects that have a better chance of achieving this while reducing emissions.

The government has admitted its green homes grant scheme – central to the “build back better” pledge will have most of its ยฃ2bn funding withdrawn. Applicants have waited months for money, meaning most of the ยฃ2bn remains unspent. Yet that funding will not be rolled over after March, so the scheme is essentially over. In the light of the pandemic, miles of new motorway may be less essential to the way people work than a boost to broadband connectivity in rural areas. That would also create “shovel-ready” green jobs and equip the UK for a low-carbon and digital future. That seems as far away as ever. [Owl emphasis]

We all know, alas, that “shovel-ready” has a very literal meaning to the Government (and our LEP) – Owl

Local MP says improving air quality should be at core of rebuilding after the pandemic

A committee chaired by local MP Neil Parish has said the government must set tougher targets to lower air pollution if it hopes to reduce the health inequalities that have been laid bare by the coronavirus pandemic.

Francesca Evans seaton.nub.news

Local MP says improving air quality should be at core of rebuilding after the pandemic

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee has put forward a report on air quality.

In presenting the report, Mr Parish, who represents the Honiton & Tiverton constituency, said: โ€œEvery year, an estimated 64,000 deaths are linked to air pollution disproportionately affecting disadvantaged communities.

“In rebuilding after the pandemic, we have a moral duty to put improving air quality at its core.”

The report summary stated: โ€œCleaner air and clearer skies were one of the few positives that many people experienced following the first COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020.

โ€œHowever, as the pandemic progressed evidence also began to emerge that air pollution might be playing a role in peopleโ€™s susceptibility to, and increased mortality from COVID-19.

โ€œAir pollution is the largest environmental risk to UK public health and is linked to as many as 64,000 early deaths a year. It is an issue that our predecessor committees returned to several times, concluding the government had failed to address the scale of the challenge.โ€

The committee has revisited air quality in light of the pandemic and has presented its key findings as follows:

โ–ช Lockdown restrictions from March 2020 led to less traffic and changing travel patterns and many people experienced better air quality. But by September 2020, most towns and cities saw a return to pre-lockdown levels of air pollution.

The temporary improvement in air quality does not mask the need for faster progress on air pollution.

โ–ช Although there is a link between poor air quality and COVID-19 mortality and morbidity; a strong and established case already existed for taking action to reduce health inequalities from air pollution, and the governmentโ€™s Clean Air Strategy should be amended to include measures to reduce these long-term health inequalities.

โ–ช The Environment Bill should also be amended to include a health inequalities target; require the Secretary of State to take account of human health considerations when setting or reviewing air quality targets; and include a duty on all government departments and local government to work together to deliver these targets.

โ–ช The Environment Bill does not provide the robust legal framework needed given the scale and urgency of the challenge. It should be amended to include a specific target to reduce the annual mean concentration of PM2.5 to under 10ฮผg/m3 by 2030, in line with World Health Organisation-guidelines.

The Secretary of State should also use his discretionary powers in the Bill to set additional long-term air quality targets for the other key pollutants that harm human health.

โ–ช The Clean Air Strategy relies too much on local authorities, delegating most responsibility for delivering air quality improvements to them without providing sufficient competencies and resources to deliver. 

The duties related to local โ€œair quality partnersโ€ in the Environment Bill should apply to all levels of government and public bodies; and the Government should commit to a long-term funding structure for local authorities to underpin their new duties in the bill.

โ–ช Reducing the use of public transport was necessary during the pandemic, but action is needed to prevent a permanent shift in public attitudes towards it as well as to maintain momentum in increasing active travel. 

As restrictions are lifted, the government should work with local authorities and providers to reassure the public that public transport is safe and to promote its use. The government should also match its rhetoric on active travel with sufficient funding.

Click here to read the full report form the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee.


NHS reorganisation: the need for change but is this the right moment?

The Lansley reforms of the National Health Service in England, embodied in the Health and Social Care Act 2012, failed. More than 500 pages long, and often opaquely expressed, the legislation stripped control of the NHS from national and local government, and thus from the public, creating a large new bureaucracy to manage healthcare, drive competition and build a regulated internal market.

Owl recalls that, at the time, these reforms were expressed in language so opaque that only the author seemed to understand them. Reason enough for a strong Prime Minister to call a halt. โ€œIf you canโ€™t explain it simply, you donโ€™t understand it well enough” – Albert Einstein. Such opacity was contagious and was even infecting EDDC around 2015.

The Guardian view on NHS reorganisation: the need to integrate 

Editorial www.theguardian.com 

Few would dispute that the Lansley reforms of the National Health Service in England, embodied in the Health and Social Care Act 2012, failed. More than 500 pages long, and often opaquely expressed, the legislation stripped control of the NHS from national and local government, and thus from the public, creating a large new bureaucracy to manage healthcare, drive competition and build a regulated internal market. Coming amid fierce spending austerity, the reforms were often seen as the enabler of a programme of cuts and privatisation. โ€œI could and should have stepped in earlier,โ€ David Cameron admitted in his memoir.

Disastrous though the reforms have been, and clear though the case is for replacing them, a new attempt at reorganisation would be destabilising, mid-pandemic, without strong support within the NHS that it can be implemented sympathetically. Matt Hancock embarked on such an attempt on Thursday, in his Integration and Innovation white paper. His proposals unquestionably cut with the grain of much that NHS England has been advocating to improve integrated care in the past two years. But Mr Hancock will have to make a strong case over the coming weeks if the public is to be persuaded that this reorganisation is the right priority in health policy.

Thatโ€™s because the context is at least as tough today as it was in 2010-11. The NHS is in the midst of the biggest public health crisis it has ever faced. Staff are exhausted and there are large numbers of vacancies. Waiting lists for essential interventions are lengthening alarmingly โ€“ nearly quarter of a million people are now waiting more than 12 months for treatment. The care crisis is getting worse and there is no clear plan for reform and financing. The economy is on life support, with public money likely to be very tight for years. Ministers mess with the NHS at their peril.

Exactly why this is the right or necessary time to launch a structural reorganisation of the NHS is not obvious. Higher spending seems a much more immediate and practical response. Mr Hancock says that lessons from the pandemic point towards the need for his new approach. That may well be true. Covid has cruelly exposed some of the multiple fragmentations in the health service โ€“ not just between health and care, but between proactive and reactive health services, between hospitals and GPs, and between physical and mental health. Nevertheless, Mr Hancock was very selective in the lessons he cited to MPs. Nor were the lessons he mentioned new discoveries.

It is true that the Covid-19 crisis shows the need for better integration. This is something for which NHS England has been pressing, in the form of what it calls integrated care systems. But the largest single example of the current fragmentation โ€“ the relative neglect of care homes in relation to hospitals โ€“ will remain unaddressed until there is a proper spending programme, which forms no part of the white paper.

The past 12 months have exposed several ways in which the health department and NHS England have struggled to respond as effectively as they should. But it is far from obvious that these would have been better handled by Mr Hancock taking more powers from the NHS England chief executive, Simon Stevens, as he proposes to do. It is not clear that an empowered Mr Hancock would have avoided many of the most significant failures of the pandemic to which he conspicuously did not refer in the Commons on Thursday. These include major failures of equipment provision, staffing shortages, lack of proper training for the Nightingale hospitals, poor coordination, IT deficiencies, the abortive test-and-trace system, and the appointment of inadequately qualified cronies to management roles. After the immense efforts and sacrifices made by NHS and care workers, Mr Hancock needs to proceed with a humility that his tin-eared predecessor failed to show a decade ago.

East Devon Watch – the first million hits part 3

Old Owl concludes

A million hits โ€“ third and final part

So, after parts 1 and 2, here we are.  It is December 2019.  Ben Ingham (formerly Tory, then Independent, then Leader of East Devon Alliance and now Independent again โ€“ but not for long as he moves back to his original Tory home soon โ€ฆ) is now Leader of East Devon District Council.  He has steadfastly refused to allow any East Devon Alliance independents to join his cabinet or committees and instead he has allied himself with various Independents, quasi-Independents, โ€œreally-not-very-independent-at-all-but-I probably-wouldnโ€™t have-got-in-if-I-still-called-myself-Toryโ€ independents, and real Tories – and all is not well.

There are many rumblings about his management style, his hard-to-uncover motivations and plans.  Eventually these erupt into open disagreement and defections.  By March 2020 it seems common sense prevails and those not allowed into the corridors of power have realised that they now have to desert a sinking ship and/or work together to defeat the current regime, which is anyway falling apart.  Owl describes the situation in February and March 2020 here:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2020/02/11/breaking-news-cllr-paul-millar-joins-east-devon-alliance-independents/

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2020/06/19/east-devon-district-council-the-pendulum-swings/

By May 2020, things have sorted themselves out โ€“ hurrah!  Although, it has to be said, the sorting out was frustrated again and again by various quasi-independent and Tory councillors, particularly the Chairman of the Council, Stuart Hughes who manipulated the office (with the help of CEO Mark Williams and other old guard Tories) to delay the inevitable changeover of power as much as possible:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2020/05/page/2/

However, as it has done recently in the USA, democracy prevailed and a coalition of many different independents and smaller parties rose into the ascendent and in May 2020, Councillor Paul Arnott, Leader of East Devon Alliance was made Leader of the Council:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2020/05/29/east-devon-elects-new-leader-at-second-attempt-after-chaotic-meeting/

Immediately the new power group made a controversial (but highly popular) decision โ€“ it withdrew East Devon District Council from the much-hated Greater Exeter Strategic Plan โ€“ which would have seen East Devon take most of Exeterโ€™s overflow housing into the west of the district, as Paul Arnott explains here:

https://eastdevonwatch.org/2020/08/31/council-leader-paul-arnott-explains-the-reasoning-behind-the-change-of-policy-of-withdrawing-from-gesp/

Tory councillors, who had fought long and hard to see much more development in East Devon were not happy!

Since then, it has to be said, there has been a much more calm, co-operative, transparent and collegiate way of doing democratic business in East Devon โ€“ which like all other councils has been torn asunder by the ravages of Covid-19.

Throughout all this time, East Devon Watch has fulfilled its brief โ€“ to keep its beady eye on the ramifications of decisions about how East Devon should progress into the future and how that progress should happen.  It has been the source of many scoops, has been loved by many and hated by quite a few (not least our current and past MPs who have never, and will never, escape accountability for what they do and say).

EDW finds East Devon in much safer hands but in much more fragile times and will be reporting on and commenting about the matters that we all need to know about โ€“ prodding, pushing, investigating, reporting, criticising (without fear or favour) so that you, the constituents and voters have a better idea of what is going on and who is moving and shaking events.

Soon, if Boris Johnson is to be believed (hhhmmmโ€ฆ) there will be elections to County Council in May 2020 and probably by-elections and elections again in East Devon.  EDW will be on the case.

During its lifetime, this Old Owl retired and handed on the baton (twig, branch) to New Owl who is doing a magnificent job of keeping its fresh, beady eye on the district.  Long may it continue!

And Old Owl feels confident in saying the next million hits will be just as interesting (or even more interesting) than the first million!

PPE: Ministers pay consultants to find procured kit

The government is not sure where billions of pounds worth of personal protective equipment (PPE) is located, the head of the National Audit Office has disclosed.

Rajeev Syal www.theguardian.com

Gareth Davies, the comptroller and auditor general, said outside consultants had been brought into Whitehall to find all equipment, which is stored at different sites around the country, or is in transit from abroad.

The task had been undertaken so that the Department of Health and Social Care knew when stocks would become too old to use and could complete its own accounts, he said.

Under questioning from the public accounts committee, Davies said: โ€œWe have been working closely with the DoH. It has commissioned consultants to advise it on first of all understanding where all the PPE that has been bought actually is. It sounds like a strange question but it is a really big issue because it is not all standing neatly in an NHS store somewhere.

โ€œWe have amounts in containers, in storage around the country, thereโ€™s some on the docks and there is some en route somewhere from China.โ€

Concern over shortages of PPE was a marked feature of the early phase of the pandemic last year as countries around the world scrambled for scarce supplies as the disease spread across the globe.

Frontline staff in both health and social care experienced shortages of PPE, with some forced to reuse single-use items as stocks ran low.

In July, Rishi Sunak allocated ยฃ15bn to procure masks, gowns and gloves โ€“ a sum that dwarfs the entire spending of other Whitehall departments.

Davies said the task of evaluating how much the stock was worth would also mean assessing when the equipment went beyond its โ€œuse byโ€ date.

โ€œEvaluating that [PPE] accurately for the 31 March for the accounts is a really difficult proposition โ€“ it is not one that can be avoided because it is a very material sum this year. Fifteen billion pounds has been budgeted to spend on it in the year.

โ€œWe have been working with the department and their consultants to understand how they are getting a handle of where the material is and then how it is being valued, including the issue that I know the committee has been interested in, the age of the stock and at what stage does it become unusable and therefore valueless.โ€

The government has been criticised for an over-reliance upon outside consultants during the pandemic.

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson confirmed that it has outside consultants working on its accounts, but said it was incorrect to suggest they are working on locating and accounting for PPE. The department did not reply to questions asking which outside consultants are being employed or how much they are being paid.

โ€œThese claims are false. We are working to ensure that our accounting records are accurate and up to date and the National Audit Office is performing its annual audit. As is standard practice in any industry, a stock take is done before the end of the financial year, so that records are up to date. The Department of Health and Social Care is no different,โ€ the spokesperson said.

NHS: What reforms does the government want to make?

Joined-up care and less bureaucracy are among the proposals by the government in a bid to reform the health and social care system in England.

ITV News www.itv.com 

A plan to build on work done during the coronavirus pandemic to create a โ€œmore integrated, more innovative and responsiveโ€ NHS has been set out by Health Secretary Matt Hancock.

However, many have questioned why these changes are being suggested while the NHS battles the Covid-19 crisis.

So, what exactly is being suggested?

What do the plans hope to achieve?

The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said the proposals include improving care and tackling health inequalities through measures to address obesity, oral health and patient choice, the Department of Health said.

The measures effectively sweep away some of the bureaucracy and organisational changes introduced by then health secretary Andrew Lansley in the heavily criticised 2012 Health and Social Care Act which increased competition in the NHS.

The DHSC acknowledged that under the current system NHS staff waste a significant amount of time on unnecessary tendering processes for healthcare services.

The new proposals mean the NHS will only need to tender services when it has the potential to lead to better outcomes for patients.

What about social care?

The White Paper (the way the government sets out planned changes) promises better integration between the NHS and social care, which is usually funded privately or by local authorities.

Making it easier to treat people outside hospitals and making it safer and easier for medics to discharge patients into the community could ease pressure on the NHS while also improving care.

The governmentโ€™s plans would allow the NHS and local government to come together legally as part of integrated care systems to plan services around their patientsโ€™ needs, including a greater focus on preventative healthcare outside hospitals.

Will ministers have a greater role?

Ministers will assume greater responsibility, although Mr Hancock has insisted the clinical and day-to-day operational independence of the NHS will be protected.

The reforms will give the health secretary โ€œthe right levers to ensure accountability back to Parliament and taxpayersโ€, DHSC officials said.

Anything else?

The coronavirus pandemic has starkly illustrated the dangers of an obese population and the White Paper includes new requirements about calorie labelling on food and drink packaging and the advertising of junk food before the 9pm watershed.

The White Paper also calls for the Healthcare Safety Investigations Branch to be made a statutory body and so able to enforce laws, and to reduce risk and improve safety.

What did the government say?

The proposed social care reform will โ€œmake the system work for those who work in the systemโ€, Mr Hancock told the Commons.

โ€œAt its heart, this White Paper enables greater integration, reduces bureaucracy and supports the way that the NHS and social care work when they work at their best together,” the health secretary said.

โ€œIt strengthens accountability to this House and, crucially, it takes the lessons we have learnt in this pandemic of how the system can rise to meet huge challenges and frames a legislative basis to support that effort.”

Mr Hancock continued that โ€œthere is no better time than nowโ€ to carry out social care reform.

Answering critics who have asked โ€œwhy now?โ€ Mr Hancock told the Commons: โ€œThe response to Covid-19 has, in my view, accelerated the pace of collaboration across health and social care, showing what we can do when we work together flexibly, adopting new technology focused on the needs of the patient and setting aside bureaucratic rules…

โ€œThe pandemic has made the changes in this White Paper more not less urgent, and it is our role in Parliament to make the legislative changes that are needed.”

Shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth questioned plans to reform the health service during the ongoing pandemic Credit: UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor/PA

What has Labour said?

Labour also questioned the timing of the suggestions, with shadow Health Secretary Jonathan Ashworth saying” โ€œStaff on the front line are exhausted, underpaid. The Royal College of Nurses says the NHS is on its knees.

โ€œPrimary care and CCG staff are vaccinating and will be doing so for months ahead, including possibly delivering booster jabs in the autumn. And today we learn that 224,000 people are waiting over 12 months for treatment.

โ€œAnd this secretary of State thinks this is the right moment for a structural reorganisation of the NHS.

โ€œNow we will study the legislation carefully when published but the test of his reorganisation will be whether it brings waiting lists and times down, widens access, especially for mental health care, drives up cancer survival rates and improves population health.โ€

He added: โ€œFundamentally, how will this reorganisation and power grab improve patient care?

“He didnโ€™t mention waiting times in his statement, itโ€™s only mentioned once in the leaked White Paper.โ€

What have experts said?

Richard Murray, of the Kingโ€™s Fund health think tank, said there was โ€œmuch to welcome in the ambition of the White Paper, but the history of the NHS is littered with reform plans that overestimated benefits and underestimated disruptionโ€.

He also questioned the timing of the proposed shake-up, with the health and care sectors still battling Covid-19.

Sir Simon Stevens, chief executive of the NHS, said: โ€œOur legislative proposals go with the grain of what patients and staff across the health service all want to see โ€“ more joined-up care, less legal bureaucracy and a sharper focus on prevention, inequality and social care.โ€

Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard, chair of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges welcomed the proposals โ€œto drive integration and support greater collaboration through integrated care systems (ICS)โ€.

She said while legislation will not make collaboration happen, it can โ€œremove barriers and facilitate the changes that the NHS really needs as we move into the post-pandemic recovery stageโ€.

NHS Providers chief executive Chris Hopson said there is โ€œwidespread agreementโ€ across the NHS on many of the proposals in the White Paper based on a set of agreed legislative proposals in 2019.

He said: โ€œThese proposals provide an important opportunity to speed up the move to integrate health and care at a local level, replace competition with collaboration and reform an unnecessarily rigid NHS approach to procurement.โ€

But he said the organisation is โ€œkeen to understand the governmentโ€™s intentions on some of the new proposals it has added such as the new powers for the Secretary of State to direct NHS England, transfer powers between arms length bodies and intervene in local reconfigurationsโ€.

Dr Jennifer Dixon, chief executive of the Health Foundation, gave only a partial welcome.

She said: โ€œOne half of the proposals, to help local services collaborate better, could help improve care for patients and follows the direction NHS leaders are already taking.

โ€œThe other half, giving the Secretary of State more power over the NHS, is concerning, has no clear rationale and could take health care backwards.โ€

Ian Hudspeth, chairman of the Local Government Associationโ€™s community wellbeing board, said the paper โ€œprovides a promising base on which to build stronger working relationships between local government and the NHSโ€.

The British Medical Associationโ€™s council chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul warned against rushing reform when doctors are โ€œnow both physically and emotionally exhaustedโ€.

He said: โ€œProposals for sweeping reorganisation on such a scale will need greater time for consideration and must not be rushed through while doctors are still tackling the winter surge in infections, hospitalisations and tragically, deaths.โ€

Harvard researchers have calculated how many unnecessary deaths the Trump administration left behind

A novel way to audit an administrationโ€™s impact on the health of a nation. Owl has totted up the figures which appear to exceed 2 million over Trumpโ€™s four year term.

Wonder how Boris is doing? What are the โ€œcostsโ€ of his delayed decision making?

Arianne Cohen www.fastcompany.com 

The Trump administration leaves a devastating health legacy far beyond COVID-19, according to a new study in The Lancet by 33 researchers, led by professors at Harvard Medical School and the University of California at San Francisco.

The report finds that the Trump administrationโ€™s health policies resulted in 461,000 unnecessary U.S. deaths annuallyโ€”in addition to 40% of Americaโ€™s COVID-19 deaths thus far, plus 22,000 avoidable deaths annually from environmental policies.

The authors paint a damning picture of Trump politics, concluding that he purposely sought struggling white voters, and then backed policies that threatened their health: He earned his largest 2016 electoral margins in counties with the countyโ€™s worst mortality statistics, with life expectancies averaging 2 years shorter than in counties where he lost. His policies overwhelmingly favored corporations and wealthy Americans.

The paper presents a horrifying quantification of how and why the pandemic has cost so many American lives. Though the report points many fingers at the Trump administration, it also highlights the previous four decades of weakened social and health safety nets, including the 50,000 frontline workers that public health agencies lost from 2008 to 2016 due to budget cuts; over 10% of Americans faced hunger, which correlates with a high risk of obesity and diabetes, both common factors in severe COVID-19.

The researchers compared the U.S. figures to those of G7 nations. โ€œThis unprecedented decoupling of health from national wealth signals that our society is sick,โ€ says coauthor Steffie Woolhandler, a lecturer (and former professor) at Harvard Medical School. โ€œWhile the wealthy have thrived, most Americans have lost ground, both economically and medically. The Biden administration must reboot democracy and implement the progressive social and health policies needed to put the country on the road to better health.โ€

This is the first comprehensive look at the health impacts of the Trump administration.

Devon and Cornwall are closed to tourists this half term

Tourism bosses in Devon and Cornwall are backing the police message to holidaymakers not to travel to the region during next week’s traditional half-term school holiday.

[Matt Hancock admits he’s booked a summer break in Cornwall after Transport Secretary Grant Shapps declared: โ€˜People shouldnโ€™t be booking holidays right now โ€“ not domestically or internationally.โ€™ www.dailymail.co.uk]

Colleen Smith www.devonlive.com

Despite the disastrous impact that Covid-19 has had on the holiday sector, industry leaders across the South West all joined the police and emphasised that lockdown still means lockdown: “Please, please do not come.”

The director of Visit Devon, Sally Everton, said: “Saying ‘Don’t come’ goes against the grain because my role in life is to promote Devon’s tourism industry – so for me it is really difficult. But we 100 per cent support the police message. We are still in lockdown. It is illegal to travel outside of your local area.”

It comes despite new figures which show that the region lost over half of its visitor economy in 2020, with 166,000 South West people currently on furlough – most of those in hospitality.

Devon and Cornwall Police issued their message earlier today urging people to stay local in order to prevent the spread of coronavirus. It called on people to โ€œstay local this half termโ€, saying the region โ€œwill welcome you back again soonโ€.

In March 2020 CornwallLive, DevonLive and Plymouth Live joined forces with the region’s MPs, tourism leaders and the emergency services to issue one simple message – please come back later.

The campaign continues with its three main objectives, calling on visitors to pledge to:

Help stop the spread of corona and save people’s lives

Protect our NHS from further pressure

Support our tourism industry by pledging to come back later in the year and not now

Alistair Handyside, South West Tourism Alliance chairman, said: “We are in lockdown. We are closed. Please, please do not come.

“And then, when we do eventually get the announcement that we can open the message is very simple: Don’t come unless you have booked somewhere to stay because we will have less capacity.

“We have lost a lot of business and some are not operating. For example 15 per cent of holiday cottages will not open because they are not confident about dealing with the Covid cleaning and all the other issues around this terrible pandemic.

“Hotels will be operating at less than normal capacity, as will guest houses.

“Although people are predicting a boom what they don’t realise is that we are full because we have less capacity and more demand. This means people have to book before they come.”

Ms Everton, the director of Visit Devon, added: “Our message to tourists is very clear: Welcome back – but not until it’s safe. We are very much in the government’s hands and as things stand people have to stay away. It’s illegal to travel out of your local area. We 100 per cent support the police message.”

Malcolm Bell, chief executive of Visit Cornwall, agreed that that the tourism boardโ€™s message is very much in line with that of Devon and Cornwall Police.

Mr Bell added: โ€œThere is no reason for anybody to come because we are in lockdown.

โ€œItโ€™s stating the obvious to be honest but that does probably have to be restated and itโ€™s always good to remind everybody.

โ€œI think a lot of people might say that they knew that and of course, they are aware that they canโ€™t come, but it doesnโ€™t hurt to remind people of that.โ€

He continued: โ€œAs always public health comes first and that goes without saying. We did have two-and-a-half-million people down last year with no impact so it has proved that the tourism industry can operate in a Covid safe manner when safe to do soโ€.

North Devon MP Selaine Saxby yesterday called on the Health Secretary to give reassurances that efforts to get coronavirus infection rates in the region to among the lowest in England will not be eradicated by the return of tourists.

Ms Saxby asked Matt Hancock after he unveiled tough new measures for travel in England whether the Government is working on making sure the infection does not increase when tourists are allowed back.

The Conservative MP also asked about whether consideration is being given to easing lockdown measures in areas were infection rates are low.

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps raised fears that Britons might not be able to enjoy a holiday either in the UK or abroad this summer.

Mr Shapps told Sky News that border measures were now targeted against newer variants of the virus, rather than a means of restricting travel to areas with higher infection rates as under the now-scrapped “travel corridors” system.

“It’s not about the prevalence of the virus elsewhere now, it’s about the variants,” he said.

Ms Everton added: “Last year there was very clear evidence that tourists did not cause a spike when they were here during July and August.

“But now we have all these variants which are far more transmissible. In Devon and Cornwall we have done a great job and the figures for the virus are coming down and down. It proves that lockdown works.

“Many of our holiday businesses have spent thousands of pounds to ensure they are Covid safe and have the correct personal protective equipment. Now when we are allowed to reopen it’s up to the public to play their part – act like responsible adults and stay away from crowded places. The problem is that when people come away on holiday they tend to breathe a sigh of relief and think ‘Ah – thank God for that’ and forget the Hands, Face, Space rules still apply.”

More than a quarter of Devon has now had jab

Nearly 300,000 people in Devon โ€“ more than a quarter of the population – have had their first Covid-19 vaccine, latest NHS England figures show.

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com 

The statistics, which provide the position as of February 7, show that there have been 284,342 vaccinations in the county, with 271,603 of them being the first dose. Just under 70,000 vaccinations were carried out in that seven day period.

The figures for Devon, which will have risen in the most recent days, are by far the highest number of vaccinations for any of the regions within the South West โ€“ double that of Cornwall – and they show that 27.1 per cent of the population had received their first jab. This is up on the 20.5 per cent as of January 31.

With estimated adult population of the Devon STP area being 999,049, the 271,603 who had received their first dose, means that as of Sunday, 27.1 per cent of Devonโ€™s residents had received at least one dose of the vaccine. Those numbers will have risen since, with Thursday morningโ€™s Team Devon Local Outbreak Engagement Board meeting hearing the number was now just under 300,000.

The statistics show that as of Sunday, of the 79,525 estimated population of over 80s within Devon, 76,193 had received their first vaccine โ€“ a total of 95.8 per cent, with 10,897 โ€“ 13.7 per cent โ€“ having also had the second dose, with Devonโ€™s population of over 80s is significantly higher than every other region โ€“ more than double in some instances

Of those aged 75-79, 54,074 people have received the first dose of the vaccine โ€“ an estimated 98.2 per cent of the cohort โ€“ while 42,785 of those aged 70-74, an estimated 53.8 per cent of the cohort โ€“ had as of Sunday had at least one dose.

And 98,551 under 70s, primarily those employed in health and social care settings, although some in the next cohorts from the priority list, had received the first dose of the vaccination as of Sunday โ€“ 12.5 per cent of the total under 70s.

Health chiefs say that the remain confident that all of those in the top four priority groups โ€“ all those in care homes, health and social care staff, and those over 70, will have at least been offered a vaccine by Monday, and that so far, 84 per cent of them had received their first vaccination.

Dr Paul Johnson, clinical chair of the Devon CCG, told Thursdayโ€™s morning Team Devon Local Outbreak Engagement Board meeting that close to 300,000 first doses in Devon had now been issued.

He said that all but eight care homes where Covid-19 outbreak had been in progress had now been vaccinated, and that they were ready to start on cohort 5 โ€“ the over 65s next week.

Dr Johnson said: โ€œGiven the high proportion of older people in the county, it is testament to good work to keep up with other areas who donโ€™t have so many old people.โ€

He showed figures that prior to the start of the vaccine rollout from a survey that they carried out that suggested that 74 per cent of the population were happy to take the vaccine, 19 per cent were hesitant, two per cent were resistant, while less than two per cent were going to reject the vaccine.

He said: โ€œIt looks like we will get at least 90 per cent of the population having the vaccine, so a significant number who were hesitant have been persuaded.โ€

The Team Devon meeting also were presented with findings from Living Options, who had been asked jointly by Devon County Council and Devon Clinical Commissioning Group, to contact a wide range of partners to gather their perspectives on how their often vulnerable and hard to reach service users were understanding the new Covid-19 vaccination programme

The report said: โ€œA positive majority of respondents will not reject having the vaccine and feel that prevention is better than a cure. They feel that, though there may be risks attached to it, as nothing is free of side effects, healthy people are dying and they would rather give the vaccine a go.

โ€œThe biggest concern was about possible side effects as the testing is seen to be for a much shorter amount of time than normal. There is confusion for many on the practicalities of when they might get the vaccine and difficulties in knowing where best to look for accurate information. It feels for some like there are inconsistencies in provision across localities and this can be hard to understand / accept.

โ€œMany communities, including BAME and Learning Disability, are identified already as being disproportionately affected by Covid-19 and this inequality is further compounded by a lack of translated resources about both Covid rules in lockdown and information about the vaccine.

โ€œAccessible information including alternative languages, Easy Read, BSL and for those who are hearing and / or visually impaired is essential.

โ€œOther communities that might be more vulnerable to Covid are homeless people, refugees / asylum seekers, those in custody, and Gypsy / Romany Travellers, so it will be vital that strategies are in place to vaccinate these as soon as possible.

A member of staff prepares a dose of the Oxford/Astrazeneca coronavirus vaccine at a coronavirus vaccination clinic at the NHS Nightingale Hospital North East in Sunderland. Picture date: Tuesday January 26, 2021. (Image: PA Wire/PA Images)

โ€œAlongside making the vaccines manageable to all communities the actual vaccination centres must also be as accessible as possible. Many people live without anyone else to offer practical support to help them so this must always be understood, and provision made to ensure that they are equally able to access information / the actual vaccine.

โ€œPoor mental health is an increasing concern, and the vaccination programme offers hope that the pandemic may start to get a little easier to live through and there is good understanding of why certain groups have been prioritised.

โ€œHowever, those who are vulnerable, but not in a priority group, may feel they have to โ€˜shieldโ€™ until they receive the vaccination to remain safe. This is likely to increase feelings of loneliness and isolation. There is also an increased reporting of those who have serious agoraphobia / OCD, amongst other conditions, because of the key messaging about how Covid-19 is transmitted. This can stop people being able to leave their houses so provision needs to be made for people in this situation to enable them to access the vaccine.โ€

There are now five methods by which the vaccine is being rolled out across Devon.

All four of the countyโ€™s main hospitals โ€“ in Plymouth, Exeter, Torquay and Barnstaple โ€“ are giving the vaccination to priority groups in line with national guidance, while GP practices are working together in groups to set up local vaccination centres, and across the county, 20 centres are now in operation, serving all of Devon practices.

GP-led facilities are delivering the vaccine to residents and staff in care homes, while pharmacies have started to deliver the vaccine, and the mass vaccination sites at Home Park in Plymouth, and Westpoint Arena just outside Exeter became operational with thousands of vaccines a day to be delivered.

Every Devon care home has been vaccinated as well, except for those where there were active outbreaks.

East Devon Watch โ€“ the first million hits Part 2

Old Owl continues..

Part 2 – The scandals โ€ฆ

So, here we are โ€ฆ Claire Wright, a new, young, very feisty INDEPENDENT district councillor, looking for answers (a novelty in itself) and prepared to do whatever it took to find them โ€ฆ and a restive community pining for change.

Scandal 1 โ€“ the โ€œLocal Development Framework Forumโ€

This was a closed group, meeting in secret, with no agendas or minutes published (which is why it was created as a โ€œForumโ€ and not a full committee).  Its job was to scope out future development sites to include in the forthcoming Local Plan, which every council was being forced to produce by central government to very narrow guidelines.

It was hard at first for her (and others) to penetrate this secrecy โ€“ but to cut a long story short โ€“ eventually through Freedom of Information requests and publicity, EDDC reluctantly had to publish the agendas and minutes.

And what a scandal that was!  It seemed that this Forum spent most of its time discussing and visiting sites of close associates and businesses to assess their suitability for developments large and medium.  This was NOT the idea of such a group.  It was supposed to assess ALL sites brought forward by ALL interested parties against criteria that ought to have included such things as sustainability and landscape protection.  Again, to cut a very long story short, this was found to be the wrong way to be going about things (duh) and the whole procedure, Forum and all, had to be scrapped and started again โ€“ this time as a formal committee – with the beady eyes of the public (and Claire Wright) watching โ€ฆ at least two years wasted (though it would undoubtedly not have been wasted had it been allowed to remain secret and led to a Local Plan that would have been very, very local).

Scandal 2 โ€“ the East Devon Business Forum

Some bright sparks in the ruling group then had a stunner of a brainwave.  Given that councillors and officers were now having to be in the open, why not create another group of local councillors and landowners and get them to be the major force for the new Local Plan โ€“ genius!

The great and the โ€œgoodโ€ were therefore assembled and โ€“ yet again โ€“ met in secret under the redoubtable chairmanship of one Councillor Graham Brown, who had also played one of the leading roles in Scandal 1 above.  But this time local and national developers had seats (by invitation only) at the table.

All the usual โ€ฆ er I was going to say suspects but letโ€™s say local and national house builders and wannabe housebuilders โ€ฆ were members.  And, to add insult to injury, the Forum was allowed to meet in an EDDC-owned building, bankrolled and given senior administrative support by โ€ฆ East Devon District Council – at this point under the iron hands of Karim Hassan and Mark Williams aided by their senior officer Nigel Harrison, who gave this Forum all the help it needed.

Once again, much fighting by locals meant that this โ€œForumโ€ eventually had to publish its work, which, once again, concentrated on giving its members the best possible opportunities to be developers large and even larger โ€ฆ

Once people heard about this new group, there was outrage and a growing number of local people decided that something radical needed to be done.  This led to the creation of a new local pressure group โ€œEast Devon Allianceโ€.  This group had no interest in political affiliations โ€“ it simply wanted what was best for East Devon, not for developersโ€™ pockets.

East Devon Alliance eventually had no choice but to register as a political party if it wanted to fight locally (and even nationally) in elections, which it duly did.  It had some success at the local elections 2015, returning several councillors, but not enough to encroach on the established Conservative majority.  Still it was making inroads.

Scandal 3 โ€“ I can get you planning but I donโ€™t do it for peanuts

What can one say โ€“ a sting by the Daily Telegraph no less and it even made its front page!  A couple of delightful young women were sent to talk to Councillor Graham Brown about how to get planning permission in East Devon, covertly recording their meeting.  Bear in mind, he was Chair of East Devon Business Forum AND ran his own planning consultancy while being a Conservative councillor at this time.

Owl can report no better than this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-21768520

It must be noted that Councillor Brown was not suspended immediately and resigned rather than being expelled from the Conservative Party.

Tempers were now running high, and there was even a report published on planning scandals which devoted a whole chapter to East Devon!  It was called โ€œScaring the Living Daylights out of Peopleโ€ by Anna Minton:

https://spinwatch.org/index.php/component/k2/item/5458-the-local-lobby-and-the-failure-of-democracy

Partly on the back of this and partly because of a real desire for change in the district, the East Devon Alliance went from strength to strength and fielded more candidates at the next local election in 2019 and successfully got some of those candidates elected to the district council.  It seemed like EDA was in the ascendance but then a major setback occurred. Its then Leader, Ben Ingham (formerly a Conservative Councillor, then an Independent councillor, then an East Devon Alliance councillor) turned once again to become an โ€œIndependentโ€ Councillor claiming to be the leader of all independents in the council.

At the May 2019 elections the Conservatives lost their overall majority but โ€œIndependentโ€ Ben Ingham turned his back on the East Devon Alliance, he once led, and took a miscellaneous group of independent councillors into a loose coalition with the Conservatives, following very similar policies to those of the defeated Tory administrationโ€ฆ. All that hard work had now come to nothing!

Next โ€ฆ part 3 concluding โ€“ successes, the future and East Devon Watchโ€™s place in that future โ€ฆ