Times says 7 more privatised companies may be under threat

“As the country wonders which big name in the construction and services industry will follow Carillion into bankruptcy, Stephen Rawlinson may have hit upon the answer — and it’s one that offers little reassurance to any of the leading players.

According to the respected independent analyst: “We are asked continually, ‘Who is the next Carillion?’ There are individual candidates, of course, but the sense we have now is that it could be the whole UK-based construction and services sector.”

That view will ring alarm bells in corporate boardrooms and public sector committee rooms nationwide, but it rings true with investors. Shares of the industry’s heavyweights, government contractors providing public services, looking after public buildings and estates and/or building them, have plummeted. The reasons why — and why recovery, if at all, has been slow — are troubling enough on their own, but added together they sum up the huge challenge facing the outsourcing industry. …”

[The article goes on to name G4S, Babcock, Mitie, Kier, Interserve, Capita and Serco]

Source: The Times, paywall

EDDC HQ builder deeper in the mire – just who does privatisation work for?

With a government paralysed by Brexit does anyone care what is happening to yet another privatised company that will cost tax payers dear if (or rather when) it goes under? Imagine how many local companies could have built that HQ!

“… Interserve is one of the UK’s biggest private sector employers in areas such as office-cleaning, while it also provides support to Britain’s armed forces in Cyprus, Gibraltar and the Falkland Islands.”

https://news.sky.com/story/struggling-interserve-may-hand-construction-unit-to-lenders-11581667

EDDC HQ contractor’s shares plunge to 6p – in 2014 they were worth 700p!

Perhaps using local companies would have been less risky!

“The crisis surrounding outsourcing firm Interserve intensified on Monday as its shares lost more than 75% of their value, crashing to just 6p, as the government contractor battles to negotiate its second rescue deal this year.

The heavily indebted group, which has thousands of government contracts such as cleaning hospitals and serving school meals, said the rescue plan would mean substantial losses for shareholders as the banks that have lent Interserve more than £600m take control of the company. It hopes to wrap up a deal early next year.

Interserve’s shares plunged to 6p in early trading, giving it a market value of less than £9m. At its peak in 2014, the shares were worth more than 700p….”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/dec/10/interserve-shares-rescue-plan-carillion

Good job EDDC’s HQ is almost finished … and let’s hope it is perfect … !

“Cabinet Office mandarins are believed to have sounded out Interserve’s rivals about the possibility of taking on some of the outsourcer’s work.

The cleaning and building company is heading for a debt-for-equity swap with its lenders as it creaks under debts of £650m. The swap could wipe out shareholders.

Interserve is a significant government supplier, with long-term deals for schools, hospitals and motorways. Jon Trickett, Labour’s shadow minister for the Cabinet Office, last night called for a temporary ban on the company bidding for public contracts — “until they have proved they are financially stable and there is no risk to the taxpayer”.

Interserve said: “The fundamentals of the business are strong and the board is focused on ensuring Interserve has the right financial structure to support its future success.”

Source: Sunday Times

Privatisation – another big company seeks rescue – the one building EDDC HQ!

Owl says: Has the message still not got through? Privatise, give your directors MASSIVE salaries and bonuses, look after your shareholders. Then, when it all goes belly-up either (a) get the government (ie us) to bail you out or (b) let your government clients (ie us) go to the wall!

“Interserve: Major government contractor ‘seeks second rescue deal’

One of the UK’s largest providers of public services is seeking a rescue deal as it struggles with £500m of debt, according to the Financial Times.
Interserve, which works in prisons, schools, hospitals and on the roads, said it might look for new investment or sell off part of the business.
Workers at the Foreign Office and the NHS are among Interserve’s tens of thousands of UK employees.

The government said it supported the company’s long-term recovery plan.
The Financial Times reported that the company was looking for a deal to refinance its debt which would mean lenders taking a significant loss while public shareholders would be “virtually wiped out”.

Its share price dropped to a 30-year low last month.

Despite lucrative contracts in the Middle East and its wide range of work in the UK, the company has continued to lose money since March, when it agreed an earlier rescue deal.

Its troubles have been blamed on cancellations and delays in its construction contracts as well as struggling waste-to-energy projects in Derby and Glasgow.

Interserve claims its prospects are improving, and says it will increase profits this year.

What does Interserve do?

From its origins in dredging and construction, the company has diversified into wide range of services, such as health care and catering, for clients in government and industry.

At King George Hospital in east London, for instance, Interserve has a £35 million contract for for cleaning, security, meals, waste management and maintenance.

Its infrastructure projects include improving the M5 Junction 6 near Bristol, refurbishing the Rotherham Interchange bus station in Yorkshire, and upgrading sewers and water pipes for Northumbrian Water.

But Interserve is also the largest provider of probation services in England and Wales, supervising about 40,000 “medium-low risk offenders” for the Ministry of Justice.

In a statement, Interserve said: “The fundamentals of the business are strong and the board is focused on ensuring Interserve has the right financial structure to support its future success.”

The company said its options included bringing “new capital into the business and progressing the disposal of non-core businesses “.

Interserve’s difficulties follow the collapse of Carillion in January 2018, which put thousands of jobs at risk and cost taxpayers £148m.

Government reassures over Interserve

Following that, the government launched a pilot of “living wills” for contractors, so that critical services can be taken over in the event of a crisis. Interserve is one of five suppliers taking part.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “We monitor the financial health of all of our strategic suppliers, including Interserve, and have regular discussions with the company’s management. The company successfully raised new debt facilities earlier this year, and we fully support them in their long term recovery plan.”

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46494465

“Motability firm boss quits after news of £2.2m bonus”

Owl says: Bet May and her cronies HATE the National Audit Office!

“The boss of the business that leases cars to people with disabilities on behalf of the Motability charity is stepping down after it emerged he is set to receive a £2.2m bonus on top of his seven-figure salary.

Mike Betts, the chief executive of Motability Operations, came under fire earlier this year after MPs called his annual £1.7m pay package “totally unacceptable”.

A report by the government spending watchdog, the National Audit Office (NAO), published on Friday says as well as his “generous” remuneration, Betts is in line for a previously undisclosed performance bonus worth about £2.2m.

Following the report, Motability Operations announced that Betts would stand down from his position by May 2020, while the group’s chairman, Neil Johnson, would retire in April 2019.

In a statement, Motability Operations said: “After 16 years in the business, Motability Operations chief executive Mike Betts and the board of Motability Operations Group plc have agreed that, following the implementation of actions agreed as an outcome of the NAO review, and working to help the new chairman settle in, a suitable successor will be found, and Mike will step down from the board, no later than May 2020.

“The board is clear that recommendations made by the NAO will benefit from Mr Betts’ experience and skills to see them through.”

The Motability scheme enables disabled people to lease adapted cars using their enhanced mobility disability benefits – either disability living allowance or its successor, the personal independence payment. It currently helps about 614,000 people, many of whom would otherwise struggle to afford a vehicle.

The NAO is critical of the performance plan put in place for Betts and his fellow directors in 2008, saying that the targets meant to incentivise “excellent performance” were set at levels below what the company was achieving when the scheme was introduced.

The targets were “easily exceeded” and in the first seven years of the plan, five executive directors received “generous” remuneration of £15.3m in total, a near fourfold increase for what the NAO suggests was unexceptional performance. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/dec/07/motability-firm-boss-to-get-22m-bonus-on-top-of-17m-salary

Outsourcing: Carillion and potential crimes affecting councils

“The collapse of the construction giant Carillion has hit the headlines again as auditing failures among the Big Four accountants have come to light. For many, the real impacts (and horrors) of the collapse are only now emerging.

Oxfordshire county council has spent £1.7 million on an audit of the council’s ten-year services contract with the company. It reveals shocking levels of oversight — missing building certificates, fire safety issues, unmet planning conditions — and the scale of the damage done, in health and safety and in financial terms, is breath-taking, especially when you consider the council spent a total of £123 million with Carillion on 602 municipal projects.

We are still to find out exactly what happened behind the scenes, and the results of the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) criminal investigation is hotly anticipated.

The news of the collapse in January was reported alongside photos of the directors’ properties, and details their extravagant pay deals. In June this year the FCA said it was “looking into” allegations of insider trading. Perhaps this was a result of a complaint made in February, by people who say they have been the victims of the directors’ crimes. Increasingly the police are failing to investigate financial crimes, through sheer lack of resources. Will the FCA be able to do any better?

The long story short goes like this: Carillion’s directors had a stack of duties and obligations because they ran a PLC. The huge pay deals are supposed to be there for a reason. One of their many obligations was to keep the market informed of the company’s financial situation. Dishonestly failing to do that is a crime called “misleading statements”. Making misleading statements is related to the crime of insider trading. The point of both crimes is the same: to keep the markets fair. The victims, or at least the people making a complaint against Carillion, are the bosses of a firm called Kiltearn Partners. Kiltearn is an institutional investor: a business which invests large sums in stocks and shares on behalf of lots of smaller investors, such as people putting money into a pension.

In January 2017 Kiltearn owned 10 per cent of Carillion’s shares on behalf of their clients. In March that year Carillion published its 2016 accounts, and everything was painted in rosy colours. Kiltearn staff had no reason to think they should be selling its shares in Carillion. Not until a couple of months later anyway. Because on July 10, 2017, Carillion told the market about a massive problem — there was an £845 million hole in its cash flow. It said it needed to make provision for this, and basically wrote it off. Unsurprisingly the share price tumbled, and Kiltearn was left with the feeling it had been had. Bosses called for an investigation into whether Carillion’s management knew, or should have known, about the cash flow issue — with this statement Kiltearn was reporting a crime.

If there turns out to be solid evidence that the Carillion directors have committed market crimes, it looks likely to follow there will also be evidence that they have committed fraud. It could even be a first prominent outing for “fraud by failing to disclose information”, a section of the Fraud Act 2006.

It will be interesting to see if the FCA has the skill and determination — and ultimately the evidence — to bring the directors to book. In the meantime, it is likely we will continue to see other victims of Carillion’s collapse emerge.”

The author is a barrister at 23 Essex Street

Source: The Times

Privatisation: making money out of our children

Schools: 7,000 privatised:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/dec/05/private-takeover-schools-forced-academisation-waltham-holy-cross

Private firms are making big money out of children’s social services:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/dec/05/private-firms-making-big-money-childrens-social-services

Construction groups in trouble as banks tighten lending

“Shares in the construction firm Kier, which is working on major infrastructure projects such as HS2 and Crossrail, have plunged by a third after it announced an emergency plan to raise £264m to cut its debt pile.

The company’s chief executive, Haydn Mursell, said it had been forced to act because banks had performed a “180-degree turn” since the failure of Carillion and were planning to reduce or stop lending to the construction sector.

Mursell warned that other construction companies could be caught out by the sudden credit freeze unless they also took action to strengthen their balance sheets.

Kier, which employs more than 16,000 people and took on Carillion’s share in HS2 and smart motorways upon its collapse, stunned the markets by warning that the risk posed by its £624m debt had increased, forcing it to raise money.

It would go to shareholders for the cash but has secured promises from a group of financial institutions including Santander, HSBC and Citigroup to buy shares if investors did not want them.

Its shares dived by 32.5% to 508p, cutting its stock market value by £329m to £492m.

Kier, in a statement to the stock market, said its debt position had become more risky amid greater reluctance among financial institutions to lend to the construction sector.

“Nothing has changed in our business, but everything has changed in our credit markets during the month of October,” said Mursell. “A lot of our banks were affected by Carillion and for a few months they were reeling from that. Over the summer they talked about wanting reduction.”

He said the banks’ loss of appetite for lending had accelerated recently to the point where they had taken a “180-degree turn” compared with last year, when Kier was able to extend lending facilities.

Mursell added that suppliers were already keeping a close eye on construction companies’ finances and seeking earlier payment where possible, putting further pressure on balance sheets. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/nov/30/kier-construction-shares-lose-30-on-plan-to-raise-cash

“Former academy head given £850,000 payoff” (and other sleazy details)

“The former head of a controversial academy is being paid an £850,000 severance package out of proceeds from a private leisure centre run on the school grounds, MPs have heard.

Details of the payment to Sir Greg Martin, the former head of the Durand Academy in Stockwell, south London, emerged on Monday during a hearing of the Commons public accounts committee, which is investigating academy accounts and performance.

It is the latest development in a long-running saga involving Martin, who was knighted for services to education and was once a favourite of Tory ministers, before falling out of favour as concerns grew about financial management and governance at the school.

Durand Academy has since been transferred to a new sponsor and has been renamed the Van Gogh primary school, but the Durand Education Trust (DET) retained ownership of the private leisure centre developed on the site, as well as two accommodation blocks, which originally generated additional income for the school.

John Wentworth, a DET trustee, told MPs the assets – the leisure centre and accommodation – were still generating £400,000 a year but “most” of the money was going towards Martin’s severance pay rather than going towards’ children’s education.

“At the moment, we have a considerable liability to the previous executive headteacher of Durand Academy,” Wentworth told MPs, adding that the severance figure had been “considerably higher” but had been reduced after negotiations between Martin and the Charity Commission.

Wentworth told MPs there were ongoing discussions between the DET and the Education and Skills Funding Agency about what would happen to the leisure centre and accommodation blocks. He said if the DET retained control they would be used in line with its charitable objectives “to support the wider education objectives of children in Lambeth and to support the children at the Van Gogh primary school”.

The hearing offered some fascinating insights into the complexities of transferring schools from one trust to another. The Dunraven Educational Trust, which finally took over Durand, was given just 48 hours to make a decision after the Harris Federation pulled out, though Harris helpfully shared all the information gathered during its investigations. Nevertheless, committee chair Meg Hillier described it as “a 48-hour fire sale”.

The hearing was also told about troubles at Bright Tribe, which ran 10 schools in the north and east of England which are now being rebrokered. The academies troubleshooter, Angela Barry, who was brought as interim chief executive, refused to give details about ongoing investigations but apologised for past failings.”

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/nov/19/former-academy-head-given-850000-payoff

Another company with local government outsourcing contracts hits the headlines

“Interserve, one of the biggest outsourcing companies serving the government, scrambled to calm market jitters yesterday, rebuffing claims that it was teetering on the brink and could follow Carillion into receivership unless it could raise fresh capital.

Shares in the group slumped by as much as 26 per cent to less than 29p, before retracing almost all of the losses and ending the day at 38.5p, down 2 per cent, when a positive statement was rushed out mid-afternoon. This said that the implementation of strategy “remains on track” and the group continued to expect a significant operating profit improvement this year “in line with management’s expectations”.

The latest flurry of investor nerves began last week after a joint venture partner, Renewi, disclosed that Interserve had missed a deadline on an important energy-from-waste project in Derby. They intensified yesterday when the BBC reported that it was planning to tap investors for more cash, citing sources close to the company.

The group provides meals for schools and hospitals, constructs and maintains government buildings and provides a string of other services, from asbestos removal to repairing flood barriers. It employs 75,000 people worldwide, 25,000 of them in the UK, and has a turnover of £3.2 billion.

The Cabinet Office has been on alert to be prepared for another outsourcer collapse after the National Audit Office said that the Carillion failure had cost taxpayers £148 million. Ministers were accused of mishandling that failure.

A Cabinet Office spokeswoman said yesterday: “We monitor the financial health of all of our strategic suppliers, including Interserve, and have regular discussions with the company’s management. The company refinanced earlier this year and we fully support them in their recovery plan.

“It is in the taxpayers’ interest to have a well financed and stable group of key suppliers, so we welcome the actions that the company is taking as part of their planned strategy.” More than £900 million has been wiped from the value of the company, which now stands at just £56 million, since the share price high of 700p in April 2014.

In March, Interserve agreed a complex £800 million rescue refinancing with lenders, bondholders and pension trustees, which it said would provide sufficient capital to see it through to September 2021. Most of the £197 million in new cash was provided by Emerald Investment, the family office of the Punch Taverns tycoon Alan McIntosh.

Yesterday’s statement said nothing about the speculation that new capital was needed, however. Simon Jack, the BBC’s business editor, quoted a former shareholder saying that it would need £500 million in new capital — a huge amount that would all but wipe out existing shareholders.

At the half-year results in August, Interserve reported a slide from profits of £24.9 million to a £6 million loss, but promised £40-50 million per year of cost savings by 2020. Net debt was £614 million, up from £503 million a year earlier.

The company has previously said it aims to deleverage eventually, with most analysts assuming this meant a rights issue at some point, but it had hoped to make enough progress to get the share price higher first.

Stephen Rawlinson, an analyst with the research firm Applied Value, said: “Interserve has been failing at a trading level for some time. Now it seems to be failing at a financial level too. ”

Interserve’s biggest shareholders, according to Thomson Reuters, are Coltrane Asset Management, a New York fund, with 17.5 per cent, Goldman Sachs with 9.1 per cent and Valkendorf, a Danish hedge fund, with 8.2 per cent.

Memories of Carillion debacle still raw.

Behind the story

One big outsourcing company going bust on the government may be regarded as misfortune. Two would look like carelessness. Which, 11 months after the collapse of Carillion, is why the Cabinet Office is on red alert to ensure public services would not be disrupted if Interserve were to fail (Patrick Hosking writes).

The group is a large supplier to the public sector. Seventy per cent of its £3 billion of annual revenues come from government, whether it is cleaning and maintaining 1,100 offices and depots for the Department for Transport or building the Defence National Rehabilitation Centre in Loughborough — a £150 million project to help rehabilitate and care for injured servicemen and women.

It is also a significant supplier to the private sector. It provides the cleaners for Boots stores and the Walgreens Boots head office, as well as providing interior fittings for John Lewis department stores.

But it is its role in creating centres converting waste into energy which is at the heart of the latest concern about the group. These have fallen behind schedule and Interserve, after making a provision of £195 million, is still trying to extricate itself from the disastrous diversification.

That was the brainchild of Adrian Ringrose, the former chief executive, who shareholders blame for much of the group’s troubles. He and two other departing executives received a combined payoff of £1 million last year after presiding over several profit warnings.

His successor, Debbie White, a former executive at Sodexho, the French catering group, who joined in September 2017, is trying to cut costs, simplify the business, reduce the myriad services offered to clients and introduce more discipline in bidding for new work.

But the sliding share price suggests the market is sceptical about her progress. It also explains why, according to one source, civil servants, who are under pressure to make contingency plans after the Carillion debacle, have been quietly asking rival outsourcers if they could take on Interserve’s projects in the unlikely event of its failure.”

Source: The Times (pay wall)

“[Privatised] Academies record £6.1bn deficit”

“Academy schools in England recorded a £6.1bn deficit at the end of last August, leading to one major teaching union calling them “unsustainable”.

The 7,003 academies received total income of £22.5bn in 2016-17, compared to £20.5bn in the academic financial year before, and spent £24.8bn, compared to £20bn in 2015-16, according to the academy schools annual report and accounts released on Tuesday.

The £6.1bn deficit recorded includes an £8.4bn asset derecognition charge. The government took land and buildings assets off academies’ balance sheets where they did not feel trusts were controlling them, even though, academies continued to occupy them.

The number of academy trusts, charities which academies must be part of, in cumulative deficit at the end of August 2017 went up to 185 from 167 in August 2016, the report showed.

Kevin Courtney, joint general secretary of the National Education Union, said academies’ financial situation was “unsurprising” given the overall pressures on school budgets. “But it is particularly serious for academies which cannot call on help or support from the local authorities,” he added.

“These accounts also show us why the academy system is unsustainable and undemocratic.”

Academies are independent state schools funded directly by the Department for Education via the Education and Skills Funding Agency – rather than through local authorities.

Courtney said it was “high time” the government recognised the academy system was a “failed policy” that needed to be consigned to the “dustbin of history”.

“We need to return to the principle of local schools, accountable to local communities,” he added.

The accounts also showed that 8% more trusts (from 873 to 941) were paying some staff £100,000 or more in 2016-17 compared to the year before.

The number of staff paying salaries of £150,000 or more went up 3% from 121 to 125 over the same period. …”

https://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2018/11/academies-record-ps61bn-deficit

The case of the missing (academy schools) students just prior to exams … aka – cheating!

“Some of England’s most influential academy chains are facing fresh questions over the number of children disappearing from their classrooms in the run-up to GCSEs, following a new statistical analysis of official figures.

The same four academy chains have the highest numbers of 15- 16-year-olds leaving their schools in both of the last two academic years. In some cases, two pupils are disappearing from the rolls for every class of 30. Some local authorities are also approaching these figures for dropouts.

Fears have been increasing that some schools are “offrolling” – getting rid of students who could do badly in their exams – in an effort to boost their league table position.

The head of Ofsted, Amanda Spielman, is among those voicing concern. The inspectorate has yet to find a way to differentiate offrolling from cases where schools have acted in the best interests of children, but it has started to gather its own data.

Education Guardian looked at England’s 50 largest academy trusts and 50 largest local education authorities, and compared the number of pupils in year 11 in 2017-18 – the students counted when GCSE results are published – to the number in year 10, a year earlier.

The findings reveal a consistent pattern in some chains of year groups shrinking substantially. The same four trusts fill the top four places in our table (below) on 2017-18 data and on data for 2016-17. The trend of disappearing pupils appears to be happening at a higher rate in the academies sector. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/nov/06/academy-trusts-gcse-students-disappearing-prior-to-exams

“Headteacher acclaimed by Tories is banned from teaching”

“The headteacher of a high profile multi-academy trust, which won plaudits from former prime minister David Cameron and his then education secretary Michael Gove, has been banned from teaching indefinitely.

Liam Nolan, who was executive headteacher and chief executive of the now defunct Perry Beeches academy trust in Birmingham, was found guilty of “unacceptable professional conduct” after a hearing before the Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA).

Acknowledging Nolan’s contribution to the teaching profession, the TRA report said he should be allowed to apply to have the prohibition order lifted after a minimum two-year period, which would give him time to “reflect on his failings”.

The prohibition order against Nolan is the latest chapter in the demise of the Perry Beeches academy chain, which was stripped of its five schools after an investigation revealed financial irregularities at the trust, including third-party payments to Nolan, on top of his £120,000 salary as executive headteacher.

The Education Funding Agency investigation found nearly £1.3m in payments without contracts to a third-party supplier, a private company called Nexus. That company also subcontracted to a company named Liam Nolan Ltd, paying Nolan a second salary for his role as chief executive officer of the trust.

At the time, critics of the government’s academies policy, which takes schools out of local authority control, said the case should ring alarm bells over the accountability and financial management of academy chains and the government’s ability to police the system.

The TRA hearing found that Nolan failed to comply with recognised procedures and principles in relation to management of public funds and was in breach of the academies’ financial handbook, which sets out the financial management, control and reporting requirements for all academy trusts.

“Mr Nolan stated in his evidence that he was under pressure in developing the Perry Beeches schools and that it was against this background that he made what he described as mistakes,” the TRA report said. “However, the panel was not convinced this justified his lack of integrity in managing public finances. Although Mr Nolan apologised for some of his failings as accounting officer, there did not appear to be sufficient insight into the seriousness of those failings or his responsibility in that post.”

Cameron opened one of Perry Beeches’ new free schools in 2013, when the then prime minister praised the “brilliant team” at the trust. In 2012, Nolan addressed the Conservative party conference and appeared on stage with the then education secretary Michael Gove, who described Nolan as “wonderful”.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/nov/05/headteacher-acclaimed-by-tories-is-banned-from-teaching

“Bus firms pay fat cats £1.5 BILLION – while prices go up 55% and routes are axed”

“Bus firms have paid shareholders £1.5billion in dividends in the past 10 years, while fares have soared and services have been axed.

Fares have gone up 55% on average since 2008, far outstripping pay growth. Some passengers have even been hit by increases of 100% and bus use is at a 12-year low.

Arriva, FirstGroup, Go-Ahead, National Express and Stagecoach carry 70% of all bus passengers and have paid an average £149million a year in dividends in the past 10 years.

The most recent company records show they paid out dividends amounting to £48,077,200 from profits in the South East, £23,521,200 in the North East, £18,460,700 in the North West, £13,767,700 in the Midlands and £27,309,700 in London.

Shadow Transport Secretary Andy McDonald said: “Our bus networks are being bled dry by greedy private operators. Labour will bring buses under public control and ownership in order to reverse bus cuts rather than fill the pockets of shareholders.

“It is an outrage that bus companies enjoy colossal profits as thousands of routes are cut or withdrawn. The bus network has shrunk to its smallest size in decades and passenger numbers are plummeting.

“A combination of privatisation and Tory cuts is killing local bus services.

“Labour would enhance and expand bus services, including providing free travel to under-25s.”

The research by campaign group Better Buses for Greater Manchester also found bus journeys had fallen by 40% in urban areas since the deregulation of services by the Tories 32 years ago.

In London, where deregulation did not apply, passenger journeys on the franchised network have doubled and bus companies’ profits are around 4%, compared to 8% in cities where services are deregulated.

The Better Buses for Greater Manchester findings are revealed as a campaign is launched today urging Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham to re-regulate services, bringing buses under public control.

Pascale Robinson, of Better Buses for Greater Manchester, said: “The deregulation we have now means bus companies just run the routes they want to at a whim. They can charge what they like.

“This means the big five bus companies are cherry-picking the profitable routes, making a killing, and it is us in Greater Manchester who suffer infrequent, unreliable and expensive buses.”

Greater Manchester is one of the first cities to consider re-regulating its bus network, which would give the mayor the choice to put the public in control instead of the big firms.

Ms Robinson said: “By this method bus firms are given controlled contracts to run the services we need, services which are reliable and affordable.

“We call on Mr Burnham to be bold and give us the bus network we deserve. We can’t keep letting these companies run a Wild West, charging through the roof for a patchy service.

“For every pound of dividend given to shareholders in London, 82 journeys were taken. Elsewhere across the country, where buses are mostly deregulated except for a few small pockets, it was just under 20.”

In Greater Manchester, passengers have complained that changes to the 372 Hazel Grove-Stockport service means taking two different buses to do the same journey, which used to pass by the hospital.

They now need a £4.50 “day rider” ticket, adding £1 to each journey.

This summer the Mirror revealed how mum-of-nine Gemma Headley, 36, of Driffield, East Yorks, had to walk seven miles to get her daughters to infant school because of bus cuts. Department for Transport figures show the number of bus routes at a 28-year low.

The bus network has shrunk by 8% in the last decade. Since 2010, the Tories have almost halved funding for bus services in England and 3,347 routes have been axed or reduced.

Experts say investing in bus travel would bring benefits as people return to towns and cities to spend their money.

An analysis for Greener Journeys by auditors KPMG LLP shows that targeted investment to improve bus services would typically generate £3.32 of net economic benefit for each £1 spent.

Steve Chambers, of the Campaign for Better Transport, said: ”Across the country we are seeing the alarming impact this is having on communities, especially in rural areas, as people are being left isolated and unable to get to work, get to the shops, visit friends or access vital public services.

“The loss of bus services also has an adverse effect on congestion and air pollution as more people turn to cars, jamming up already congested roads.”

Mirror reader and retired lorry driver Michael Palmer, 74, tells how a half-hourly service from his home in the North Fitzwarren, Somerset, to Taunton, is now every two hours, finishing too early for workers returning home.

He said: “We are living in the 21st century, this is England, we should have the best public transport service in the world. Where did it all go wrong?”

A Department for Transport spokesman said: “We provide around £250million every year to support bus services and a further £1billion to support older and disabled people using the free bus pass scheme.”

The Confederation of Passenger Transport UK, which represents bus and coach operators, said the dividends paid were outweighed by investment, with Stagecoach investing £1billion on around 7, 000 new buses in 10 years.

How bus prices have risen over a decade…

All prices are for day tickets except London.

Birmingham
2008 – £3.30
2018 – £6.70
A 103% increase

Newcastle
2008 – £3.50
2018 – £5.20
A 49% increase

Manchester
2008 – £3.30
2018 – £5.60
A 70% increase

Leicester
2008 – £2.60
2018 – £5.20
A 100% increase

Derby
2008 – £3.20
2018 – £4.20
A 31% increase

Cornwall
(All day)
2008 – £8.20
2018 – £12
A 46% increase

Bath
2008 – £2.20
2018 – £4.50
A 105% increase

Liverpool
2008 – £3
2018 – £4.80
A 60% increase

Nottingham
2008 – £3.00
2018 – £4
A 33% increase

London
(No day tripper anymore)
Single journey 2008 – 90p
Single journey 2018 – £1.50
A 66% increase

Why ‘On the Buses’ loses comedic fun to big fares
By Paul Routledge

Maggie Thatcher may not, as legend says, have sneered that “any man over 26 who finds himself on a bus can count himself a failure”. As an inveterate user of public transport, I’m happy to be seen as a failure.

The bus is a traditional part of the British way of life. It’s a place for gossip, getting to the shops, the hospital and to see friends, a moving theatre of society.

No wonder On The Buses was so popular. The soap played to our affection for the bus. “Sit at the back for a longer ride!”

But it’s getting harder and harder. Thatcher’s deregulation and privatisation of the industry was a failure for would-be travellers of any age.

It brought fewer routes and higher fares – with profits and subsidies creamed off for investors, many of them foreign.

I hear grumbles galore from fellow passengers about late and cancelled services. But it’s not the crews’ fault that the system isn’t working.

The sell-off brought redundancies. The clippie went out with cost-saving one-man operation. Drivers face exhausting schedules.

The Tories cut local government funding, so councils slashed subsidies to the companies, who take it out on the passenger.

We’ve waited too long at the bus stop for an end to this rip-off.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/bus-firms-pay-fat-cats-13540251

Government not sure PFI/privatisation was such a good thing ….duh!

The article blames Labour but it was Sir John Major who introduced it in 1992 and later Labour, Coalition and Tory governments continued with them. Many dirty hands made nowt work!

“Sources claim that in the wake of the collapse of outsourcing giant Carillion earlier this year, the Treasury wants to see whether PFI schemes represent “real value for money”.

Under PFI, the state hires contractors such as Carillion to build and deliver projects – then lease it back for a set annual fee.

But under Labour [and later Coalition and Tory governments], more than 500 schemes ended up costing taxpayers five times the original building cost. In 2011 one hospital was being charged £333 by the PFI provider to change a lightbulb.

Industry insiders claim that while the Chancellor’s review won’t “re-write” previous PFI deals, it could kill off PFI “for good”. …”

A frazzled mother starts huge bus service protest in Bristol

“I gave birth to my daughter in March, and I’ve begrudgingly had to place her in a nursery already because I have to work. The nursery is on the other side of Bristol to where I live. For more than a month now I’ve failed to drop her off on time because I’ve had to wait so long for a bus to turn up. The journey normally takes 45 minutes in the rush hour, but the waiting adds an extra 45 minutes (even though buses are supposed to run every 12 minutes).

Getting her home in the evening has been even more of an ordeal. Night after night we couldn’t get back before her bedtime. At the end of the week, my baby had bags under her eyes and red pupils – the sign of a true commuter, but she’s only seven-months-old. The waits were so long I had to breastfeed her on the side of the road. I don’t mind breastfeeding in public, but I’d rather not be outside in the middle of October balancing my baby on my knee.

I finally broke a week ago when the bus I was on – operated like most in the city by First Bus – was so full it passed two stops, leaving 60 passengers stranded. By the time I reached the city centre I’d used my phone to call for a demonstration on Facebook.

Over the next 24 hours 800 people signed up. Stories of missed hospital appointments, children being late for school and people being late for work flooded in. It quickly became clear I hadn’t just organised a demonstration; the outpouring of stories and anger was now online for all to see, share and sympathise.

First Bus contacted me after the demonstration was advertised to take place on 24 November in the centre of Bristol. They blamed students returning to Bristol’s two universities, schools restarting in September, road works and closures of the popular Bristol Parkway train station. But it has admitted that it is 150 drivers short in the west of England. To try to cope, staff have been brought in from as far away as Cornwall. Any company that runs an important service in a major city needs to have planning skills and the ability to recruit and retain staff.

Ironically, while this took place, the mayor of Bristol, Marvin Rees, announced he wanted to double the number of passengers using Bristol buses. The idea that the current system could support twice the number of passengers is laughable and shows how far removed elected officials have become from the reality of privately run services. This is because they have had too little say in how transport services are run since they were rapidly privatised in the 1980s.

This is not just a problem for Bristol. The national campaign group We Own It says prices have risen by 35% above inflation as result of bus privatisation, and in the past 10 years £1.8bn of revenue generated by the big five bus companies – Arriva, Stagecoach, First, Go-Ahead and National Express – has gone straight to shareholders. This is money that could be reinvested into bus services if they were nationalised. …”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/23/bus-revolt-bristol-privatised-services