“Rural broadband con”

“Almost half of homes and businesses in rural areas described as “live” on broadband maps are not connected for fast speeds, it has been revealed.

The premises have been “passed” by fibre networks capable of delivering speeds of 24 Megabits per second (Mbps), so are shaded green – “live and accepting orders” – on official maps.

But 48 per cent of them – around 1.5 million people, it is believed – are stuck with speeds below 10Mbps and 22 per cent of those cannot obtain speeds above 5Mbps. A campaigner for better rural broadband, which uncovered the figures, accused ministers of carrying out a “deception” on people living and working in the countryside.

Graham Long, chairman of Broadband for Rural Devon and Somerset, said: “This is one of the biggest confidence tricks played on the British public since the South Sea Bubble. In urban areas, the passed but not connected effect is of the order of about four per cent – but in rural areas it is 48 per cent.” …

http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Government-accused-rural-internet/story-28950766-detail/story.html

Broadband suppliers to be forced to give automatic refunds for slow speeds or loss of service

Recall that EDDC is planning to go-it-alone for broadband distribution in East Devon. Will EDDC or the broadband provider pay the automatic compensation if the service goes down? If it is EDDC it would mean that all of us would end up paying for outages!

“Ofcom, the communications watchdog, has said BT and other operators will have to pay consumers and businesses when they are cut off or have slow broadband.

Mr Moore said: “I would welcome automatic payouts, but it depends on the amount of compensation. What we were offered was pittance. We are still being massively affected.”

Under the current system for telecommunications, customers have to make a claim for compensation rather than receive an automatic payout.

The new ruling is likely to be similar to automatic compensation schemes imposed on utility companies in which customers receive discounts when there is a problem.”

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Broadband-automatic-compensation-scheme-welcomed/story-28892867-detail/story.html

Broadband in some English villages slower than on Everest!

Dan Howdle … warned that “digital black holes” risked economic decline as businesses needed an online presence.

… “These often beautiful, scenic locations will become ghost towns,” he said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35718107

Perhaps our new super-devolved Devon and Somerset Local Enterprise Partnership could divert some of the vast sums of our money they are pledging to the Hinkley Point power station that may never be built to this good cause that will no doubt promote “economic growth”, though perhaps not for the people they would rather it went to.

Rural communications: tall mobile phone masts may not need planning permission

“Mobile phone masts in excess of 50ft in height could appear in rural communities across [the coountryside].

That’s according to the Local Government Association that say under new government proposals it allow them to be built across the country without the need for planning permission.

They say the Government is looking at relaxing planning rules to make it easier for mobile phone operators to install taller phone masts in a bid to plug the reception shortage in “not-spot” areas where there is no phone signal.

They warn that if that happens the move could open the door to mobile phone masts cropping up in beauty spots, historic locations and next to schools.

The LGA wants the government to work with councils and communities to identify and address coverage blackspots.

Council leaders say rural areas need to be able to access 21st century technology but that the installation of masts should be a decision for councils to make in consultation with local residents.”

http://www.itv.com/news/central/2016-03-02/warnings-over-relaxed-rules-for-mobile-phone-masts/

Rural broadband: still only sticking- plaster solutions

Will BT being “asked nicely” to let other providers share their network more make a difference?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35657210

Hard to say, especially as EDDC has decided to “go it alone” with rural broadband and try to provide its own service (if or when funded).

Will rural mobile “not spots” improve (a different matter, but still important) – some towns and villages still having no service or just 2G (unable to connect to internet)?

If you want answers to these questions get in touch (if you can from where you are) with EDDC Councillor Phil Twiss:

Email: ptwiss@eastdevon.gov.uk

Telephone: 01404 891327

Address: Swallowcliff, Beacon, Honiton, EX14 4TT

who is the councillor tasked with improving these services

Rural broadband – another omnishambles – our public (non EDDC) champion addresses Parliament

A cracking good appearance before Parliament by our own rural broadband champion on broadband – or lack of it. No, definitely not Councillor Phil Twiss who has seemed woefully out of his depth on the current and future situation – but real expert Graham Long.

If the audio or transcript are too long for you, simply open the transcript and look at Mr Long’s replies to MPs – highly enlightening:

The Video record of the hearing is online at:

http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/677e94ae-4479-451e-b139-ee2af3dc2a2e

And a transcript of the hearing is at:

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/culture-media-and-sport-committee/establishing-worldclass-connectivity-throughout-the-uk/oral/28948.html

Cranbrook can’t have a post office as Co-op and BT systems can’t talk to each other

th2In your dreams!

See the front page of the Cranbrook Herald for this gobsmacking story. There will be no post office for at least this year until each side works out how their systems can talk to each other (if at all).

http://www.cranbrookherald.com/home

The Co-op’s fibre system is called “See the Light” – except you can’t. So, no child benefit, no disability benefits, no old age pension if you rely on a Post Office for them. And as there is yet no bank, no banking services either, no travel money (well at least the airport is nearby!) and no sending parcels.

The nearest post office is in Broadclyst, for which you will need a car – otherwise take the bus to Ottery St Mary or Exeter.

A new town without a Post Office – what would Postman Pat and his black and white cat think!

AND the town council is VERY unhappy about the provision of 30 traveller sites in Cranbrook, now the Local Plan has been approved.

Prominence is also given to Councillor Cathy Gardner’s reservations about devolution plans.

Another mega-expensive omnishambles: mobile phone “not spots”

Once again, we will put the final sentence first. By the way, LEP in the link is Lancashire Evening Post – not Local Enterprise Partnership! 600 masts planned, 15 completed, £9.1 m spent – £607,000 PER MAST.

<strong>“By December 2015, a couple of months ago, the project had cost £9.1m and only 15 masts [out of 600 promised] were live.”

A project to end the misery of mobile phone ‘not spots’ is an embarrassing flop, a Government minister has admitted. Just 15 masts have been put up by the £150m Mobile Infrastructure Project, unveiled by George Osborne back in 2011 – when 600 were promised.

Now Ed Vaizey, the digital economy minister, has told MPs criticising the tortuously slow progress of the scheme: “I am guilty as charged. “I do not think the programme has been a success – and I do not think ministers often say that about their programmes.”

During a Commons debate, Mr Vaizey agreed “mobile phones are essential to many people in their daily lives”. He added: “We set aside £150m. We talked about 600 sites. Our heart was in the right place.”

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has decided to wrap up the Mobile Infrastructure Project next month, at the end of its original three-year timescale.

The move threatens to leave a pledge to deliver mobile phone coverage to 60,000 more remote premises across the UK – out of 80,000 in known ‘not-spots’ – in tatters.

When the scheme got underway, in 2013, ministers promised it would “help connect rural communities, create local jobs and contribute to economic growth”.

The “infrastructure and media services company” Arqiva was appointed to deliver the project and the big four mobile network operators pledged to provide their services. The £150m fund was intended to pay for the infrastructure, while the mobile phone companies funded each site’s operating costs for a 20-year lifespan.

Mr Vaizey pointed to problems with the mobile phone companies, local planners and local residents to explain the project’s failure. One council, Wiltshire, spent so long arguing about the colour of a mast it missed the deadline for planning approval. The minister said: “We were dragging four operators with us, metaphorically kicking and screaming. “We have had communities campaigning against masts and putting concrete blocks in front of the base stations to prevent any further work.”

But, Mr Vaizey insisted, the spread of 4G technology was expected to cut the area of ‘not spots’ to as low as two per cent and that of partial ‘not spots’ to about 12 per cent.

Conservative backbencher John Glen, the MP for Salisbury, said: “The situation is extraordinarily frustrating.

“By December 2015, a couple of months ago, the project had cost £9.1m and only 15 masts were live.”

http://www.lep.co.uk/news/local/project-to-end-mobile-phone-not-spots-a-flop-admits-minister-1-7729417

“Rural homeowners told to wait for three years for ‘minimum’ broadband speeds”

“Ofcom said up to 1.5 million rural households will have to wait for two to three years before getting a basic internet service required for a ‘typical’ family home.

Ofcom argues that internet speeds of at least 10 megabits per second (Mbits/s) is the “minimum… required by the typical household” with multiple devices to get a good service to stream programmes and access websites.

Broadband speed tends to be slower in the countryside because homes are generally situated further away from internet exchanges than in towns and cities.

However, in a report, Ofcom warned that there are “about 1.5 million, or 48 per cent of, premises are unable to receive speeds above 10Mbit/s” in the British countryside. …

… Why is 10 mega bits per second a measure for good broadband?

The internet speed 10Mbits/s is seen as the minimum speed needed to watch iPlayer and Netflix in high definition, and make reliable Skype video calls.
Ofcom says: “Evidence suggests that those consumers with faster connections are more likely to rate their broadband experience good. In general, 10Mbit/s appears to be the tipping point beyond which most consumers rate their broadband experience as ‘good’. This continues to support our view that a minimum of 10Mbit/s is required by the typical household.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/countryside/12120912/Rural-homeowners-told-to-wait-for-three-years-for-minimum-broadband-speeds.html

Broadba(n)d and a question for Grant Shapps

For those of you, particularly in rural areas of East Devon, struggling with your poor internet connections, this will give you no pleasure:

“BT workers were caught mocking a report into the company’s poor broadband services when they failed to put the telephone down after calling up the report’s authors.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/12117852/BT-workers-caught-on-tape-mocking-report-into-firms-poor-broadband-services.html

The question for Grant Shapps:

If you routinely record your calls where are the tapes on the young Tory bullying issue?

“Prohibitively expensive” to connect remaining rural broadband not-spots

The most recent figures showed that 3.3 million homes and businesses have been connected since 2010 – taking superfast broadband from 45 per cent of premises to 83 per cent.

However, ministers admit that it may be “prohibitively” expensive to connect the remaining premises, because of “demanding terrain and increased distances”.

Seven trial schemes have been set up to try to reach the “final five per cent”, using new solutions including fibre optic, satellite and wireless.

Ministers, who cut funding from £10 million to £8 million, say the results of those trials will be “published soon”, but there is no date for putting in the technology in rural areas.

Instead, David Cameron announced he would explore a Universal Service Obligation, the right to demand 10Mbps wherever you live, by 2020.

Some areas of London, Birmingham and Manchester are also projected to have large blackspots, but commercial operators are expected to plug those gaps by 2017.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Homes-parts-Westcountry-missing-superfast/story-28400169-detail/story.html

Yet EDDC maintains that it can connect remaining rural areas in East Devon itself more cheaply than the Devon and Somerset Consortium.

Owl sees expensive consultants on the horizon … though no doubt the new HQ in Honiton will be super, super fast!

Unspinning spin about rural broadband

A letter to the editor of Western Morning News:

Your piece in the WMN, Dec 18:

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/South-West-telecoms-firms-ready-phase-2/story-28389453-detail/story.html

makes an excellent marketing piece for Connecting Devon & Somerset, but you are misleading your readers with this supposed good news story when infact CDS is a basket case compared to almost every other county council run superfast broadband programme in England:

What you don’t tell readers is that:

1) This is CDS’s third attempt to find Phase 2 suppliers after they dumped 25 suppliers who attended their previous Phase 2 supplier day in 2014 and then failed to secure an exclusive contract with BT in June 2015.

2) Devon & Somerset are now one year behind almost every other County in England at getting Phase 2 off the ground.

3) That contract negotiations with BT collapsed in June because not one District Council in Devon would commit a penny of match funding because CDS would not tell them what they would be buying for their money.
Read the quotes from East Devon District Council’s Leader, Paul Diviani on the EDDC website about why he would not give match funding to CDS and now wants to run his own programme!!!…..

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2015/12/east-devon-district-council-will-pursue-pivotal-broadband-project-on-behalf-of-its-communities/

4) Now that the EU State Aid for the programme expired on June 30, an exemption agreement is having to be negotiated with Brussels and the EU Competition Commissioner is forcing the Phase 2 contract to be broken up into 6 or more small contracts for smaller areas of the two counties and that any supplier who is awarded a contract will be required to make all their infrastructure (fibre cable, ducts, masts, DSLAM cabinets etc etc) available to all their competitors to use.

Rather than the good news story CDS would have you believe this is, CDS are simply picking up the pieces of their two previous failed attempts to find suppliers and worst of all, having wasted two years, council budgets are tighter for 2016 than they were in 2015, so that when contracts with suppliers may possibly be signed in the second half of 2016, there is likely to be less money available for the Phase 2 programme than their was in June 2015.

And who suffer as a result of this incompetence?…….Devon & Somerset’s rural taxpayers who are being left out of this digital age.

Please correct your misleading article.

B4RDS (Broadband for Rural Devon & Somerset)
http://www.b4rds.org/

Alternative broadband provider suggested by EDDC Councillor Twiss in October 2014


Scrutiny Committee 16 October 2014

Minute 38

… In response to a question, Councillor Phil Twiss informed the committee that he would know more about the SEP funding shortly but the timescales were not expected to be kept. Work was being undertaken to see if the SEP could be extended to open to other providers other than BT.

RECOMMENDED

that clarification is sought from the Connecting Devon and Somerset team, and reported to members, at the earliest opportunity as to whether the SSDC/EDDC element of the potential £22.75 million SEP funding can be redirected to an alternative provider outside of the Connecting Devon and Somerset Programme;

that clarification is sought from the Connecting Devon and Somerset team, and reported to members on whether the original objectives of the BDUK project was to provide improved access for rural residents to Superfast Broadband, in recognition of the fact that such access is now seen as essential in modern domestic and business life, or was it also to support cheaper provision to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in more urban areas. Members would also like to have the position on state aid to businesses clarified in relation to this point;

that whatever decision are taken corporately to address providing Superfast Broadband to “the final 10%”, there is a commitment to openness, transparency and accountability from all those involved and there will be no further use of non-disclosure agreements or similar.

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/committees-and-meetings/scrutiny-committee/overview-and-scrutiny-committee-minutes/16-october-2014/broadband-scrutiny-review-report/

When did EDDC decide to ” go it alone” on broadband coverage?

Owl is confused. When exactly did EDDC decide to formulate its own solution for full broadband coverage in the district?

Certainly as early as May 2015 according to this item in the minutes of the Yarcombe Annual Parish Meeting on 18 May 2015:

“Broadband Briefing

… News had been received that morning from Councillor Phil Twiss of East Devon District Council explaining that EDDC were attempting to go it alone and provide a private equity solution which Steve Horner thought might be a more expensive solution.

Steve also commented that despite the fact that Yarcombe was not a very remote Parish we have both the A 303 and A 30 trunk roads running through the parish, it would appear that we will be left out of the programme and will have to rely on the expensive “Satellite“ solution.

Steve did promise he would continue to lobby long and hard on behalf of Yarcombe to ensure we did have a decent broadband signal.

Cllr Pidgeon thanked Steve for all his work on our behalf.”

http://www.yarcombe.net/docs/Parish%20Council%20APM%2020150518.doc

And as late as Aptil 2015, EDDC was saying that it was working in partnership with CDC – the combined Devon and Somerset group that it now seems to have pulled out of:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/business-and-investment/business-support-and-advice/

But was EDDC still taking the lead on this with the Devon and Somerset CDC? If so, wouldn’t that be a rather conflicting situation?

Also, if a ” private equity solution” is being sought, would this not come under EU tendering rules that assume a great deal of transparency on who is talking to whom about what?

If only one “private equity” company is involved surely this would be against competition rules too?

Perhaps councillor Twiss could enlighten us all.

Now you see him, now you don’t … Councillor Twiss unable to attend crucial Council meeting

The usually ubiquitous Cllr Phil Twiss (Conservative Group Whip, Portfolio holder for Corporate services, Cabinet member, member of the development working party, and Capital strategy and allocation group, member of Local joint panel, representative on Exeter International Airport consultative group and representative on South West councils group (1) was strangely absent from Wednesday’s EDDC full Council Meeting.

Unkind rumours suggest that the Honiton heavyweight, not known for his discretion, was advised to be AWOL to shield him from a perfect storm of embarrassing questions around issues he is involved in.

Stand-in Cllr Ian Thomas struggled to defend the omnishambles that is local rural broadband roll-out under Connectivity in the South West on which Phil is the District representative, given his expertise in IT and broadband issues (Councillor Twiss describes himself on the Linked-In business network site as an “Independent Telecommunications Specialist”).

Independent Cllr Roger Giles was denied the opportunity to ask the Tory Whip ( who, before Owl is challenged, says he NEVER whips!) why his party press release on the Heart of the South West devolution bid had pre-empted an official Council statement.

Most intriguingly, Independent councillor Cathy Gardner, in a follow up to a question on EDDC’s representation on Exeter International Airport consultative group, wondered if there might be a conflict of interest if a representative of EDDC speaks on behalf of their customers rather than EDDC.

The suggestion was dismissed airily by Council leader Diviani, but it would have been interesting to hear from the man himself.

(1) Ironically in 2012 when Stuart Hughes (now back in the fold as Council Chairman) was sacked as Scrutiny committee head for asking embarrassing questions about the East Devon Business Forum, Twiss said the real reason was that Hughes was “too busy”!
Hughes retorted that the Council leadership was “spineless and arrogant”.

“As a young person of Exmouth, I feel misled and horrified …”

image

So said the Exmouth College student who questioned EDDC leaders last night (16 Dec,2015), about the process behind the seafront development proposals in her town. But Deputy CEO Richard Cohen’s answer skirted around her main point (“I feel misled”), in a Full Council meeting that showed EDDC manipulative management at its very worst.

Blind block-voting without debate; and a Chair who allowed 5 serious questions from Exmouth residents to be rolled into one by the responding officer, thus enabling central points made by the speakers to be glossed over or, (as with the offer by Louise McAllister, specialist in surveys, to meet EDDC), simply ignored.

Not a single question was asked by any Majority Party councillor: only one of the 9 questions put, all from Independents, had a satisfactory answer (given thoroughly by Environment Portfolio holder, Cllr Iain Chubb).

Corporate Services portfolio holder, Cllr Phil Twiss, was unavailable to answer embarrassing questions about broadband, leaving Cllr Ian Thomas apologetically unable to provide informed replies.

The meeting reached a crescendo of ‘confidentiality’, when the critical information needed by councillors before deciding whether to give Leader Paul Diviani ‘delegated powers’ regarding the multi-million pound Heart of the South West (HotSW) devolution bid, was declared (without debate) too sensitive for press and public. So the devolution item was dealt with in private, at the end of the session.

Just a few minutes into this part of the agenda, the Chair, Cllr Stuart Hughes, closed the meeting, somewhat prematurely perhaps. There had been no discussion by councillors, and the whole point of this session had been missed: there was no vote on delegated powers for the Leader.

Digital divide could affect rural NHS services

The digital divide could see rural residents in the West missing out on being able to access services at doctors’ surgeries and even online consultations with their GP, according to a broadband campaigner.

Parish councillor Graham Long was speaking after a review of digital services in the NHS in England called for GPs to actively encourage patients to go online to book appointments and order repeat prescriptions.

It was drawn up by Internet entrepreneur Baroness Martha Lane Fox, who was asked by Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt to look at how take-up of Internet services could be made widely available. She recommended ensuring every NHS building provide free wi-fi, and that every GP practice should get 10 per cent of patients to go digital by 2017.

Mr Long, who is campaigning for fast broadband in rural areas of Somerset and Devon, said booking appointments and renewing prescriptions online could be beneficial for many people in rural areas, particularly those with poor public transport.

He said: “I live in the Blackdown Hills, and we had a bus service to the next village where there is a GP. That has been cut from five days a week to two. Ordering repeat prescriptions online would save an awful lot of travelling for people without their own transport. It has even been suggested that consultations could eventually be done online using Skype. But many people here would not be able to take advantage of this because of the slow speed connections.”

He added: “Fast broadband provides access to the trade routes of the 21st century. If you do not raise the urgency of deploying rural broadband, you will be consigning rural Devon and Somerset to Third World status.

“This should be one of the catalysts for getting fast broadband in rural areas. In the 21st century, it should all be about building fast broadband links. It is more important than improvements to the road network.”

Martyn Rogers, director of Age UK Exeter, said: “There are lots of people ordering prescriptions online now. It’s convenient because they can do it from home and it saves time and money at surgeries.

“But a government report last year on digital inclusion showed that 11 million people in this country don’t have sufficient digital capacity to do things like book appointments on line, and half of those were aged over 65.

“A lot of older people are not online. But I would encourage as many people as possible who want to do this to try it; it would seem to be cost-effective. Provided GPs are geared up, that’s great. But if it started to be mandatory, it would disenfranchise a large number of people.”

On Thursday (DEC 10) Mr Long addressed a full meeting of Devon County Council and raised the issue of the failure to provide fast broadband to many parts of the region.

He said: “Devon and Somerset’s superfast rural broadband programme, the largest in England, is now a basket case with district councils in Devon issuing press releases claiming they will run their own programme. Rural council taxpayers expect you to work with the districts to provide the publicly-funded infrastructure that cities and other rural counties now take for granted. This is not happening here and rural economies face serious decline with businesses moving out to the towns. Fast broadband provides access to the trade routes of the 21st century. If you do not raise the urgency of deploying rural broadband, you will be consigning rural Devon and Somerset to Third World status.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Digital-divide-cost-rural-areas-access-NHS/story-28353010-detail/story.html

EDDC and Rural Broadband – the facts

Excellent analysis on the East Devon Alliance website of the current situation regarding the rural broadband situation now that EDDC has announced its intention to ” go it alone” and arrange its own coverage …

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/district-issues/rural-broadband/

Would that our majority-party councillors were so well- informed.

EDDC wants to manage its own rural broadband coverage … oh dear!

Has anyone seen the project below discussed or agreed on by district councillors – or is it yet another example of the EDDC CEO Mark Williams wagging the body of the councillor dog?

Is our multi-partner STRATA IT company behind this decision? Do they even know about it? Who knows – certainly not us!

And how does it affect EDDC’s relocation plans which lay great stress on broadband connectivity as the main way in which residents will access council services?

At last night’s EDDC Cabinet meeting in response to questions from the public asking why EDDC had not committed match funding to the Connecting Devon & Somerset (CDS) Phase 2 programme run by Devon & Somerset County Councils, a statement was read out which appears to that EDDC plans to withdraw from the CDS Phase 2 programme – at the moment the only council in Devon and Somerset that is doing this.

EDDC apparently plan to run their own project to provide predominantly Fibre To The Home broadband (FTTH) across all of the rural EDDC area that is not covered by the existing Phase 1 hcontract with BT.

Anyone who knows the saga of our ( still pending) Draft Local Plan – around seven years in discussion is allowed to groan at this point!

A letter sent by Mark Williams to BDUK, (the government body responsible for UK broadband subsidies), on November 24, appears to confirm this.

EDDC is hoping to tap some of the additional £10M that was announced in the Chancellors Autumn Statement to fund the project, but it remains to be seen how much of this money may come EDDC’s way since every other District and County in the South West can be expected to claim portions of this funding and when divided up, so EDDC’s allocation could be relatively small.

At this stage the statement should not be regarded as anything more than an “Expression of Interest” since a great deal of work will have to be done by EDDC before rural residents could expect to see the fruits of this initiative.

In the meantine, CDS, funded with up to £45.5M for Phase 2 are continuing in their third attempt to find Phase 2 suppliers for 95% coverage and are holding a “supplier day” which over 20 interested companies will attend on December 4 (see post on this by Ian Liddell-Grainger below) CDS say they intend to sign contracts with suppliers in June 2016.

It is likely that any 100% coverage programme that EDDC sets up will take significantly longer than this to put in place.

The full statement as read by Cllr Ian Thomas at last night’s EDDC Cabinet meeting:

‘The questions rightly identified the fact that up till now the matter of Superfast Broadband roll out had fallen within the remit of Connecting Devon & Somerset (CDS) joint venture set up by the County Councils) and their contractual arrangements with BT. EDDC had chosen not to be a contractual party to the matter because of the excessive secrecy surrounding the original contracts.

The issue of agreeing an ‘in principle contribution’ to the phase 2 roll out or making a ‘commitment’ was not just a matter of semantics. Without an open approach to discussions and an ability to share that information with communities, it would be irresponsible to commit funding – or in effect, give it away.

EDDC was committed to pursuing the matter on behalf of its communities and recently on 24 November, the Chief Executive wrote in the following terms to the Commercial Lead of Broadband Delivery UK:

“We are writing to confirm our intention to apply for support from the South West Fund for a project to provide superfast broadband to the remaining 10% of premises in East Devon District not otherwise covered by the CD&S/BT Phase 1 buildout.

We have been in discussion with potential suppliers for the past year on a possible co-investment arrangement whereby public and private funds would be applied to the construction of a predominantly FTTH network, and we find their proposals appealing and well worth supporting, both financially by way of co-investment by EDDC, and in ‘soft’ terms.

In the absence of an application form, we intend to address the various points raised in the guidelines by way of a paper to be submitted to EDDC Cabinet and to BDUK. In the meantime, we can confirm the Council’s intention to comply with mandatory criteria points 1-5 and priority criteria points 6-9, and to satisfy information requests a-d.
We look forward to working with BDUK on the successful initiation, funding approval and execution of this important and worthwhile project.”

A reply is awaited in order to commence the stage of preparing a detailed report. We also understand that CD&S are in discussions to try to ensure the delivery of their original objectives.’

Somerset MP lambasts Devon and Somerset onbroadband fiasco and time and money wasting

December 2

BROADBAND EVENT ‘ANOTHER WASTE OF TIME’ SAYS MP

MP Ian Liddell-Grainger has dismissed as ‘an utter waste of time and money’ a suppliers’ event organised by Connecting Devon and Somerset, the local-authority-run consortium which is rolling out superfast broadband across the two counties.
CDS has announced that 50 delegates are attending Friday’s gathering in Taunton to help it ‘shape and finalise its requirements’ before tenders go out for the next phase of the scheme.

But Mr Liddell-Grainger, Conservative member for Bridgwater and West Somerset, says the event is nothing more than a smokescreen designed to hide CDS’s abject failure to meet its targets.

Earlier this year he called for it to be disbanded and for the Government to take over the project after it conceded it would fail to meet its promised target of 95 per cent coverage of the two counties by the end of 2017.
But today he said: “This is just a way of CDS trying to cover up the fact that it has failed to deliver what local people were promised.

“The fact is that it has been a shambles from start to finish and despite it talking airily of ‘engaging with the market’ at this event the whole thing is another symptom of the mess CDS has created – a mess I am now trying to sort out with Ed Vaizey the Energy Minister and the board of BT.
“The fact is that the greatest achievement of CDS to date has been to put back the roll-out of superfast broadband to hundreds of my constituents.

“It is, I am afraid, the result of boys trying to do a man’s job – and not the most competent of boys at that.

“CDS has become a by-word for ineptitude and inefficiency and none of the people running it have even had a shred of decency and apologised for the unholy chaos they have created: the word ‘sorry’ doesn’t seem to be in their vocabulary.”