BHS fall out

“As the clothing chain BHS goes bust with the loss of nearly 11,000 jobs, it’s worth recalling the hand of Sir Philip Green, the man who will share a part of the blame for its bankruptcy.

Green bought BHS in 2000 for a sum of £200 million and controlled it for 15 years, though it was registered under the name of his wife Tina, who lived in Monaco.

When he bought BHS, its pension scheme was in surplus. By the time he sold it – it was in deficit. It is estimated that his family received more than £400m in dividends from the company.

In 2004 alone, Green’s family got a £40m dividend from BHS.

A year later, he collected a £1.2 billion dividend from Arcadia – the group that owned BHS – making it the biggest paycheque in British corporate history. It was more than four times Arcadia’s profits, and Green claimed the company was in great health and BHS had plenty of opportunities to grow.

To add insult to injury, the £1.2 billion payout wasn’t taxed, since it went to his wife in Monaco. The couple were accused of tax avoidance.

All this came after Sir Philip Green was appointed by David Cameron to ‘lead a review of government waste‘, in 2010.

And just a few weeks ago – as BHS teetered on the edge of bankruptcy and a pensions scandal was about to erupt – Sir Philip Green bought himself a third luxury yacht.

By that point it was no longer his concern – he had washed his hands off BHS a year earlier for just £1.

He said at the time:

“The business is handed over in a sound financial position with significant cash balances and banking facilities in place.”

If BHS goes bankrupt, it likely won’t meet pension commitments to 20,000 people. Clearly, Green doesn’t care now.

What advice on spending money did the government get from this man?”

https://politicalscrapbook.net/2016/04/the-man-accused-of-driving-bhs-to-bankruptcy-was-appointed-by-cameron-as-a-waste-watchdog/

“I love you Yorkshire … Lincolnshire … Cornwall says Cameron in near-identical articles!

“David Cameron has been accused of touting a series of almost identical articles to local newspapers around the UK in an attempted PR “carpet bombing” of the country outside London.

The Yorkshire Post refused to publish what was billed as a “very personal” opinion piece by the prime minister.

The paper said it discovered tweaked versions of the same piece had been sent to several other regional titles as part of what it called a “sham media operation”.

The prime minister’s piece began with the words “I love Yorkshire & the Humber” and was designed to highlight some of the region’s attractions as part of English Tourism week.

In an editorial, the Yorkshire Post explains that a Downing Street press officer telephoned to offer the “very personal” piece but when the column arrived, doubts arose over how genuine it was.

“It appeared very formulaic, lacked empathy and only made passing reference to the misery caused by the Yorkshire floods,” the editorial says.

Then the newspaper discovered other regional and local publications had run remarkably similar pieces.

The Herald, Plymouth’s newspaper, published a piece from Cameron which
began with the words: “I love Cornwall and Isles of Scilly.” The Newcastle Chronicle carried a piece that started: “I love Northumberland.” And the same in the Lincolnshire Echo: “I love Lincolnshire.”

For the Cornish audience, the PM wrote: “From their stunning beaches
and coastal walks to their creative arts projects, this county is one
of the many jewels in Great Britain’s crown.”

For the north-east: “From Hadrian’s Wall to Europe’s biggest sky park,
this county is one of the many jewels in Great Britain’s crown.”

For Lincolnshire, the PM said: “From the quaint market towns to the
rolling countryside, this county is one of the many jewels in Great
Britain’s crown.”

The Yorkshire Post acknowledges that the prime minister was not likely to be aware that this was happening in his name – but refused to run his article.
The paper was also angered because it had sent a number of questions
to the PM to answer in the wake of the floods that hit the region, but
six weeks later had yet to receive a response.

The newspaper, which backed five more years of a Tory-Lib Dem coalition ahead of last year’s general election, has received widespread support on Twitter for refusing to run the article.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/13/david-cameron-accused-of-media-sham-local-newspapers-love-you-yorkshire-post

“As a young person of Exmouth, I feel misled and horrified …”

image

So said the Exmouth College student who questioned EDDC leaders last night (16 Dec,2015), about the process behind the seafront development proposals in her town. But Deputy CEO Richard Cohen’s answer skirted around her main point (“I feel misled”), in a Full Council meeting that showed EDDC manipulative management at its very worst.

Blind block-voting without debate; and a Chair who allowed 5 serious questions from Exmouth residents to be rolled into one by the responding officer, thus enabling central points made by the speakers to be glossed over or, (as with the offer by Louise McAllister, specialist in surveys, to meet EDDC), simply ignored.

Not a single question was asked by any Majority Party councillor: only one of the 9 questions put, all from Independents, had a satisfactory answer (given thoroughly by Environment Portfolio holder, Cllr Iain Chubb).

Corporate Services portfolio holder, Cllr Phil Twiss, was unavailable to answer embarrassing questions about broadband, leaving Cllr Ian Thomas apologetically unable to provide informed replies.

The meeting reached a crescendo of ‘confidentiality’, when the critical information needed by councillors before deciding whether to give Leader Paul Diviani ‘delegated powers’ regarding the multi-million pound Heart of the South West (HotSW) devolution bid, was declared (without debate) too sensitive for press and public. So the devolution item was dealt with in private, at the end of the session.

Just a few minutes into this part of the agenda, the Chair, Cllr Stuart Hughes, closed the meeting, somewhat prematurely perhaps. There had been no discussion by councillors, and the whole point of this session had been missed: there was no vote on delegated powers for the Leader.

How spin works: Cornish devolution debate takes 20 minutes so David Cameron can announce it

Lucky they got 20 minutes – in East Devon it would more likely have been 20 seconds!

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Councillors-given-20-minutes-decide-devolution/story-27883040-detail/story.html