Devon farm inspector met with violent threats

Dirty dairy farmers killing our rivers – Owl

An inspector was met with threats of violence at the start of a project in North Devon to check if farms were complying with rules to protect water quality, a report from the Environment Agency says. The study found nine out 10 of livestock businesses visited around the Taw Estuary were either causing pollution or breaking regulations.

Edward Oldfield www.devonlive.com

The project discovered a ‘surprising’ level of ‘complacency’ towards environmental rules and planning law on the farms that were visited, probably due to years of cutbacks in inspection visits. Details emerged in the report on the four-year project funded by the Environment Agency to improve the quality of waterways feeding the River Taw, which have been judged as poor or moderate due to pollution from cattle waste and fertiliser from the mostly dairy farms in the area.

An inspector visited 101 of the larger farms in the project area from 2016 to 2020. They found 66 were causing pollution, and in total 87% were either causing pollution or failed to comply with rules to protect the environment. The unannounced inspection visits resulted in advice in most cases, although there is one ongoing case of enforcement action.

The report, obtained by The Guardian under a Freedom of Information request, said the number of frontline inspection staff had been cut back in the last 15 years, which meant most farmers could expect to never have a visit during their lifetime. It said: “This may have led to complacency about regulations and a general reluctance to engage with the Environment Agency. The officer was subjected to hostility, aggression, and threats of physical violence at the start of the project, but there has been a marked change in attitude and some farmers will now contact the officer for advice.”

The officer was able to refer farmers to sources of advice and funding to improve the infrastructure on their farms, to meet regulations and reduce the risk of pollution affecting the waterways.

The 200 square kilometre area of North Devon was identified for the project, along with the River Axe in East Devon, due to concerns over the influence of farming on water quality. The inspections found problems with low quality infrastructure leading to poor management of slurry, run-off from fields rich in nutrients, and the use of fertiliser.

The area focused on was made up the catchments for the River Caen, Bradiford Water and River Yeo (Barnstaple), all of which discharge into the Taw Torridge Estuary. The Bradiford Water, Lower River Caen and Lower River Yeo were assessed as in Poor condition and the rest as Moderate.

The report said there was evidence that agriculture has a major influence on the quality of rivers. It said the low water quality in the surrounding area affected the Taw Torridge Estuary and “poses a significant risk” to bathing waters in the area, which has also seen salmon stocks continue to decline.

The estuary has protected status for shellfish, is a bass nursery, and a migration route for salmon, eels, elvers and shad in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and a Unesco Biosphere Reserve. The report said the estuary waters are “failing” due to high levels of dissolved inorganic nitrogen, algae, and faecal indicators, mostly from livestock, in the shellfish waters and the beach at Instow, which has had its bathing water status removed.

The estuary discharges into Bideford Bay and can affect bathing waters from Westward Ho! to the south, through to Saunton Sands, Croyde, Putsborough and Woolacombe beaches to the north, all popular tourist destinations for water sports and vital to the area’s multi-million pound visitor economy.

The report said South West Water had invested to reduce nitrates from the major works discharging to the estuary serving Barnstaple and the surrounding area. It added: “However, the catchment continues to fail its water quality targets and it is postulated that this is mainly due to nutrient enrichment from dairy farming.”

The report said farmers in recent years had come under “intense commercial pressure” from low milk prices to expand dairy herds, often without increasing the size of storage for cattle waste, a mixture of manure and water known as slurry which is used as fertiliser. In some cases, DIY projects built without planning permission and ignoring guidelines can overflow or fail and cause pollution. The report adds: “When slurry stores have catastrophic failures, as well as risks to the environment, there is a real risk of injury or death from the physical failure of the structure or drowning.”

It said the dairy sector has “high potential” to release sediment, nitrate and phosphorus to rivers. The Taw Estuary is classed as a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone, which means it has a closed season for fertiliser and manure spreading, but winter spreading often took place, often on saturated soils.

The report said there was “particular concern” at the widespread lack of compliance with slurry storage rules, which required five months of storage. The report said non-compliance with regulations and planning rules “appeared widespread”. It added: “Considering the cost of these stores, this is surprising and indicates a complacency towards environmental regulations and planning law, something that would not be so prevalent in other regulated industries.”

BBC News broadcasts word cloud describing Rishi Sunak as a ‘c***’ and a ‘twat’

The corporation was live outside Downing Street on Monday as the former Chancellor was confirmed as the next UK Prime Minister.

A segment of the programme featured a Savanta ComRes poll which asked people to describe the Tory leader in one word.

Craig Meighan www.thenational.scot 

Among the popular phrases to describe the PM were “rich”, “okay”, “capable” and “liar”.

Other descriptions included “boring”, “posh” and “arrogant”.

But some viewers were surprised when they saw the words “twat” and “c***” spread across their TV screens.

The first expletive had no symbols to obscure the word while the latter had an asterisk only for the second letter.

One Twitter user shared a picture of their TV screen and said: “The BBC have accidentally broadcast the word c*** twice in a week, unbelievable scenes.”

Meanwhile Wayne David said: “I actually cannot believe the BBC News showed this Rishi Sunak word cloud earlier today.”

One user described the clip as “too funny” while another said “yeah I’d say that’s about right”.

The last Hurrah: “Lord Snooty” submits a hand-written letter of resignation.

“I would be grateful if you could convey my resignation as secretary for business, energy and industrial strategy to the King,”

Everyone, especially in the Scottish Press, is struggling with Jacob Rees-Mogg’s hand-written resignation letter dated “St Crispin’s Day”.

The last hurrah for the so-called honourable member for the 18th century is good news though. – Owl

Simon Clarke (levelling up), Simon Jupp’s Minister is out. So is he.

Parliamentary Private Secretaries are appointed by ministers. So with Clarke gone our Simon will be looking for another job. Owl can’t see him being cerebral enough for Michael Gove the new levelling up minister.

With his old boss Dominic Raab back as deputy PM and Justice Secretary he could be in with a chance.

Simon will be glued to his phone for days waiting for a call.

Sunak’s government tainted from day one

Shock return of Suella Braverman taints Rishi Sunak’s vow to lead government with ‘integrity’.

The shock return of Suella Braverman as home secretary has undermined Rishi Sunak’s promise to lead a government with “integrity” on his first day in No 10….

Rob Merrick www.independent.co.uk (extract)

…Mr Sunak’s most significant move was to bring back the home secretary sacked – just six days ago – for a security breach that broke the ministerial code, in apparent payback for Ms Braverman backing his campaign.

The arch right-winger admitted breaching the rules by sending a policy document on an immigration shake-up from her private email to a colleague, allegedly misleading Ms Truss about it.

Just hours earlier, Mr Sunak, speaking outside No 10, had promised the country: “This government will have integrity, professionalism and accountability at every level. Trust is earned. And I will earn yours.”

Yvette Cooper, Labour’s shadow home secretary, said: “Just a few hours into the job and Rishi Sunak is already putting party before country.”

Ms Braverman had left office “for breaches of the ministerial code, security lapses, sending sensitive government information through unauthorised personal channels, and following weeks of non-stop public disagreements with other cabinet ministers”, she said….

…“His decision to bring Braverman back as home secretary, less than a week after she resigned for breaching the ministerial code, suggests he intends to repeat them.”

Rishi Sunak has also appointed vehemently anti-trans Tory MP Kemi Badenoch to his cabinet as minister for women and equalities. www.pinknews.co.uk

There is some good news

Under the headline:

‘Fuming’ Tory members threaten to leave after being denied leader vote

The telegraph reports:

“Tens of thousands of Tory members will leave the party in anger at being denied a vote on the next leader, Rishi Sunak has been warned.

Ben Harris-Quinney, chairman of the Bow Group, the Conservative think tank, said the decision to bar members was a “terrible advert” for the Conservative Party.

And he warned that those members who remain will be less inclined to campaign for their local candidate at the next election – making a Labour victory more likely.”

Does Simon Jupp’s “door knocking” in Newton Poppleford signal the exodus has already started locally? – Owl

Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 10 October

Hedges will sing for 100 miles across Hardy’s Dorset

The Great Big Dorset Hedge project aims to create a wildlife highway stretching nearly 100 miles from the border with Somerset in the west to the edge of Hampshire in the east.

Mario Ledwith www.thetimes.co.uk

The rolling hills, wild unspoilt landscapes and bustling market squares of Dorset served as the centrepiece for much of Thomas Hardy’s work.

Describing the rural playground in Far from the Madding Crowd in 1874, the Victorian novelist and poet wrote of land divided by hedgerows that sang as the wind danced over the land.

Now, after a century of decline, a campaign group is hoping to restore the hedges that Hardy said made “a mean show as a fence” by planting a continuous line across the entirety of Dorset.

The Great Big Dorset Hedge project aims to create a wildlife highway stretching nearly 100 miles from the border with Somerset in the west to the edge of Hampshire in the east.

As well as offering food and shelter for wildlife, environmentalists say that the network will combat the effects of climate change and reinvigorate the landscape’s physical beauty.

The project has been instigated by the Dorset Climate Action Network, which said that thousands of miles of ancient hedgerows have been ripped out over the past century to accommodate agriculture and large machinery.

Volunteers are being sought to map the hedge network before planting honeysuckle, elm, hawthorn, dogwood, blackthorn and trees in the gaps. It may take a generation for the completion of a hedgerow to “stretch the length and breadth of the county”.

Jenny Morisetti, from the campaign, said: “What we are hoping to do is fill in the gaps in the existing hedgerows to create a footpath for the natural world. The idea is that insects and other wildlife will be able to move around more freely with cover without fear of predators and be more resilient to pesticides.

She added: “It’s a big project, ambitious and long-term, but we hope it will bring communities together.”

Although in its early stages, the project is being pitched as a future tool against climate change, with hedgerows protecting against flooding and soil erosion, providing shelter and helping to combat air pollution.

The charity Rewilding Britain has called for at least 5 per cent of Britain to be returned to the wild and for wildlife to be protected across another 25 per cent of land and sea to create corridors that plants and animals can move through in response to climate change.

The project is thought to be the most expensive hedgerow expansion being undertaken in the country. Similar projects are being carried out by volunteers in Devon and by the Hedgelinks organisation across the country.

Newton Pop. work begins on new £112,000 all-weather games area in a boost to team sports

Work has begun to build a new £112,000 all-weather games area in East Devon for a host of sporting and outdoor activities.

eastdevonnews.co.uk

Construction work began on Monday (October 24) at the Newton Poppleford Playing Field, near Back Lane, and is expected to continue for the next eight weeks – if the weather allows.

The district council hopes the new area will encourage new sporting teams to set up, for all-year-round activities, such as netball, walking football and other games.

East Devon

Work begins on the new games area at Newton Poppleford Playing Field. Photo: EDDC.

The project, being led by Newton Poppleford and Harpford Parish Council, has been funded by East Devon District Council’s (EDDC) Section 106 money and Community Infrastructure Levy funds – cash paid to the authorities by developers to use on community projects.

Councillor Chris Burhop, Chair of Newton Poppleford and Harpford Parish Council, said: “This new multi-use games area is the result of several years of consulting with the local community, planning and hard work.

“The parish council is therefore delighted that this project can finally get underway.

“The new multi-use games area will be a step change in facilities in the parish and, having an all-weather surface, the area is bound to be well-used by a wide range of residents all year round.”

He added: “As a parish council we are committed to continue to expand the facilities of this parish, especially for sport and exercise and we will be looking at what we can do next.

“I hope we can see new teams being formed from the parish to make use of this facility, such as netball, five-a-side football and futsal.

“Many years ago, we had a netball team based in the village which had to disband when their court was resurfaced, and netball lines were not replaced. It would be great to see netball back.”

East Devon

Photo shows (L-R) Michael Carter – project officer, Councillor Nick Hookway – EDDC’s portfolio holder for culture, sport, leisure and tourism, Councillor Chris Burhop – Chair of Newton Poppleford and Harpford Parish Council, Parish Councillor Susan Tribble and Jacqui Baldwin – Clerk to Newton Poppleford and Harpford Parish Council. Photo: EDDC.

EDDC said the playing field was already home to well-used tennis courts, football and cricket pitches, plus a children’s playground.

Councillor Nick Hookway, EDDC portfolio holder for culture, sport, leisure and tourism, said the district council was ‘delighted’ to help fund additional sporting opportunities in East Devon.

Cllr Hookway said: “East Devon District Council is delighted to provide funds to support Newton Poppleford and Harpford Parish Council in extending sports facilities for its residents.

“This new games area will have a big impact on improving the health and wellbeing of the local community – as regular exercise is key to good all-round health for all age groups across the community.

“As football and netball are such popular sports, let’s hope that these new facilities will help to develop local talent to meet national standards.”

A mid-life obituary: how it is looking for the Tories

“A mid-life obituary can be a gift, a course corrector, and in recent days the Conservativ Party has also had a foretaste of how it might go down in history. With the polls dipping as low as 14 points, obituaries are being written, and they are ugly: incompetence, ineptitude, lying, loafing, recklessness, selfishness, squabbling, careerism-before-country.”

Comment, Clare Foges, The Times 24 Oct 22

Simon Jupp MP prioritises saving party vote over helping people in crisis

Simon Jupp says on facebook that he has been “knocking on doors” in Newton Poppleford ahead of the District Council by-election to fill the vacancy caused by the sad death of Val Ranger.

This prompted the following comment: “Could you please start responding to your emails, rather than galavanting round East Devon! People are still in crisis and are still needing help, even though your party is in pieces at the moment, your job still stands!”

In the 2019 election the Conservative candidate got only 114 votes, and Val romped home.

The best memorial for Val is for the people of Newton Pop to discard any apathy, overcome inertia and to get out there and vote for who will best represent the interests of their community. The candidate list can be found here 

This government doesn’t seem keen on giving people a vote these days so this might also be an opportunity to send them a message from Newton Poppleford as strong as the message sent from Tiverton and Honiton. A few letters to the press wouldn’t go amiss either.

The local Tories must be very worried if they have to send out their MP to canvass in a local election. Maybe he is the only activist left.

Jupp’s photo op follows his pet theme of supporting the hospitality sector. In this he is pretty much a lone wolf in the party as Jeremy Hunt ignored any lobbying and reimposed the increases in alcohol duty as part of Austerity 2.0 and the sector is really struggling. It faces a deadly combination of rising prices, rocketing food and energy costs and the prospect of recession, as the vital Christmas trading period looms.

BUT SO DOES EVERYONE ELSE. 

See: UK hospitality warns of ‘tidal wave’ of closures as crises loom.

Voting Tory isn’t going to help the hospitality sector.

PS Anyone answered a knock on the door to find themselves facing SJ in person or does he only visit the faithful few?

“Fracker” Jupp, PPS to Liz Truss, repeats his mantra

“We will come together, unite the Conservative Party, and deliver for the country.”

It is now clear that you and your party will be delivering eye watering Austerity 2.0.

Who cares a stuff about the Conservative Party?

Why is this something to celebrate? – Owl

Tory incompetence has crushed the hope of any anti-austerity fixes

Austerity 2.0 will be harsher than it needs to be, argues Larry Elliot in this extract from his column written on Monday before the new PM was announced.

Not that it will impact either Rishi Sunak (est worth £730M) or even Jeremy Hunt (est worth £17M) particularly. – Owl

“The incompetence and chaos of Truss’s brief period in office means that any hope, for now at least, of an alternative to deflationary policies has been extinguished. Both the Bank and the Treasury now feel obliged to pursue what they see as market-friendly rather than people-friendly policies. In tough times, the state can act as a shock absorber by spending and borrowing more, but Hunt thinks he has no choice but to make the public absorb more of the shock itself.”

Larry Elliott www.theguardian.com (extract)

Make no mistake, a Sunak premiership would be a victory for the financial markets and for the status quo more generally. And not just in Britain, either. After Truss’s humiliation during her 44 days in office, any country contemplating challenging the orthodoxy will now be having second thoughts.

This is a disaster, but one that Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng brought on themselves. As the Guardian revealed, the prime minister and her first chancellor were warned last month by economists sympathetic to their project of the need to square off the markets before revealing the contents of the mini-budget.

There was – and still is – a respectable case for the government borrowing more at a time when the economy is weak but the reasons for pursuing a more active fiscal policy needed to be spelled out. Truss and Kwarteng were told this by Gerard Lyons and Julian Jessop at a meeting in early September but chose not to listen.

The way forward was obvious. First, the Truss government should have announced details of a six-month energy price cap, an appropriate response to the hit to real incomes caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Other European countries had already announced price controls in response to higher gas prices and there was no reason why the markets would have been alarmed by a similar UK plan.

Second, Kwarteng should have announced a date for a later fiscal event at which he would make good on Truss’s leadership promises: the cut in NICs and the scrapping of the corporation tax increase, with the moves costed by the Office for Budget Responsibility. Any further changes should have been parked until a full budget in the spring of next year, again with an OBR assessment.

Instead of this step-by-step approach, Truss and Kwarteng committed blunder after blunder. All three stages were telescoped into one, the OBR was sidelined and the story became less about protecting the public from the side-effects of Putin’s war than about borrowing for tax cuts for the rich. The prime minister and the chancellor seemed surprised by the hostile market reaction but they really should not have been.

Now a hard rain is gonna fall. Kwarteng’s replacement as chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, is preparing a package of swingeing spending cuts and tax increases that will suck demand out of an economy already in the early stages of recession. In this he is being egged on by the International Monetary Fund, which thinks it is a good idea for both monetary policy – what the Bank of England does – and fiscal policy to be tightened at the same time.

But the idea should be to use a combination of monetary and fiscal policy to bring inflation down with the minimum amount of collateral damage. At a time when the Bank is in danger of being spooked into over-aggressive increases, it would make sense for the chancellor to be pushing in the opposite direction. The upshot of having monetary and fiscal policy pushing in the same direction will be an increase in company failures, higher unemployment and weaker consumer demand. The recession will be deeper and longer, making it harder for the government to meet its targets for borrowing and debt.

When Truss was running to be prime minister, she pushed back against the idea that there was a quantifiable “black hole” in the public finances that could be filled only by tax increases or spending cuts, and she was right to do so. Estimates of the public finances in the future rely on assumptions about how fast the economy will grow, because faster growth means a higher tax take, lower spending and smaller deficits.

The incompetence and chaos of Truss’s brief period in office means that any hope, for now at least, of an alternative to deflationary policies has been extinguished. Both the Bank and the Treasury now feel obliged to pursue what they see as market-friendly rather than people-friendly policies. In tough times, the state can act as a shock absorber by spending and borrowing more, but Hunt thinks he has no choice but to make the public absorb more of the shock itself.

In those circumstances, people act rationally. They spend less and save more; businesses find they have fewer customers and respond by cutting back on investment. Unemployment rises and companies go bust.

The fact that there are people on the left as well as the right who insist that Hunt has no choice other than to usher in a new age of austerity is evidence of the harm that Truss has caused. Governments always have choices, and this one has decided that a period of fiscal discipline is now necessary.

Hunt will get the full backing of whoever becomes PM for policies that will lead to more people relying on food banks and shivering in their homes this winter, fearful of turning the central heating on because of the cost. Desolation Row is about to become more desolate.

We have a new PM, what’s the plan?

Rishi Sunak was instrumental in getting rid of Boris Johnson and came second to Liz Truss, in the process the Conservative Party concocted to succeed him.

She crashed the economy in 44 days.

In order to stay in power and avoid a general election at all costs, the Conservative Party has now decided that he should be next up for the job.

Yet we, the electorate, haven’t a clue what plan the third choice has for us is.

East Devon airfield plans spark backlash

The new owner of a small, private airfield in East Devon has hit back at ‘nefarious’ objectors and also East Devon District Council after having to officially apply into an entity operational 365 days of the year. Farway Common Airfield, Moorlands Farm, just outside Sidbury in East Devon, was established 36 years ago and was originally operated under the ’28 day rule’.

Anita Merrit www.devonlive.com

However, it has always been available 365 days a year to both resident and visiting aircraft which is evidenced from airfield logbooks, the on-site flying school and aircraft owners. As the site doesn’t technically have planning permission, new owner and qualified pilot James Hortop, has had to apply for a Certificate of Lawful Development.

The planning application has so far received 108 public comments and of those, 56 are in support of it and 51 against. Concerns raised include noise pollution, safety concerns for those directly under flight paths and being in with an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).

Gary Fuller, who lives directly by the 30 acres airfield which has two runways, said: “The new person who has bought it is trying to develop it into something a bit bigger and a lot of residents have complained due to concerns about excessive noise and it is in an area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

“I am also worried about disruption, the flight paths, being overlooked and what it could turn into. I believe the peace and tranquility we have experienced in the last 10 years will change and there will be no changing it back when the new owner gets the certificate of lawfulness.

“The person who owned it before just had it as a private airstrip. He was in his 90s and hadn’t flown for about 10 years, but he used to have people fly in and land there and would have some things running from there, but if it ever got too noisy he would put a stop to it. He ran it with respect for the neighbours.

“From what I have read on the planning application, the new person who bought it has big plans for the airfield to make it a bigger commercial venture and it will be used whenever he wants.”

Farway Common Airfield

Farway Common Airfield

To address concerns raised by local residents and objectors, Mr Hortop has written an open letter. In it, he states: “We are very disappointed with the obvious campaign that is running in objection to our recent application for a lawful use certificate. Many of the objections are a cut and paste from a circular letter whose writer has not properly read or understood our application.

“Despite making our contact details known and introducing ourselves to our near neighbours not a single one has opened any dialogue whatsoever as to what our plans are and our reasons for the application. We did not want to make an application; we were forced to do it.

“We write this letter in an attempt to prevent further concern, worry and fear that these circulating nefarious letters/social media posts are creating.”

He continued: “Due to unnecessary escalation from the council – with an out of the blue Contravention Notice despite writing to EDDC – we have had no choice but to apply for a Certificate of Lawful Development. This is simply to protect what has been occurring at the airfield for over 20 plus years.”

Mr Hortop added: “All we seek to do is regularise the operation of the site as a small airfield. The application to do this has been blown out of all proportion.”

Mr Hortop confirmed that its resident pilots fly around 70 to 100 hours per year (five to eight hours per month). He said: “We are also a small airfield with very limited space; we simply don’t have the room for hundreds of aircraft.”

Addressing concerns about its commercial flying school, he said: “The word ‘commercial’ has been taken out of all context. By commercial, we mean ‘for reward and employment. This does not mean an ab-initio school for would be commercial pilots who want to do circuits all day, every day.

“In fact, it would actually be illegal as such training must occur at a licenced facility. The flying school has operated for over 12 years.”

He continued: “The site has operated at a greater intensity than it does now for numerous years over the last two decades. No complaints during this time were received.

“There has been no impact on the ANOB, our fields are full of wild flowers, insects, pollinators, deer and birds. We seek to preserve and protect this environment.

“However, the natural asset that Farway Common Airfield has become is dependent on flying activities. Without it, we would be forced to graze horses or other livestock which would result in a monoculture.

“Had the airfield caused many of the issues that people are worried about, EDDC would have acted five, 10, 15 or even 20 years ago. There have been no complaints to act on.

“While we completely understand the concerns, the perceived negative effects of the airfield on the area have not materialised.”

Thanking those who have shown their support for the application, he said: “Farway is clearly loved by many and an important local and national asset to the flying community.”

Farway Common Airfield

A spokesperson for East Devon District Council said: “The council received a complaint early in the summer from a resident raising concerns that the times that Farway Common Airfield is used had significantly increased in recent times and now far exceeds the 28 days in a calendar year that the airfield can operate without needing planning permission. Council officers investigated the claims and agreed with the complaint and so advised the airfield to either stop or apply for retrospective planning permission.

“In response, the operators of the airfield have made an application called a Certificate of Lawfulness to demonstrate that they have been operating for more than 28 days per year for at least the last 10 years. Under the legislation where this is proven through evidence then the use can be recognised by the council as being lawful having operated unchallenged for more than 10 years.

“It is only right that this matter be formally addressed through the current application and residents be given the opportunity to submit evidence to challenge the applicant’s case. The airfields case could never have been formally considered other than through a formal application. A decision on the application will be made in due course.”

James is CEO of Merlin Equipment which supplies and designs of unique power products to the marine, specialist vehicle and defence industries. During Covid-19, his business delivered 500 x COVID vaccination and test vehicles in just three months

The Certificate of lawful development involves taking off, landing and manoeuvring of aeroplanes on the ground, and would allow operation 365 days per year – and regularising the use that currently takes place. The Town & Country Planning Act 1990: Section 191 as amended by section 10 of the Planning & Compensation Act 1991 states that the local authority has a period of up to 10 years to take enforcement action against breaches of planning control.

After the time limit has passed, the development becomes lawful, in terms of planning. To view the planning application, please click here.

Tory wars continue – New phase announced

“Christopher Chope, the MP for Christchurch and a supporter of Johnson, warned on Monday that Sunak was seen as having undermined both Johnson and Truss, and could not thus expect loyalty from his own MPs. To have a mandate, Chope said, Sunak needed to call a general election.”

“I believe I am well placed to deliver a Conservative victory in 2024…” Boris in his statement as he “bottles it” this time.

Rishi Sunak will face ‘ungovernable’ Tory party, warns Johnson supporter

Peter Walker www.theguardian.com 

Rishi Sunak’s hopes of a smooth accession to power have taken a blow after Boris Johnson supporters warned he would face an “ungovernable” Conservative parliamentary party, while Penny Mordaunt’s campaign insisted she remained in the race.

The former chancellor could be named as the successor to Liz Truss as party leader, and thus prime minister, as early as 2pm on Monday if Mordaunt, the Commons leader, fails to gather the necessary 100 nominations from MPs.

Sunak, who has over 160 nominations, became the very likely winner after Johnson announced on Sunday night that he would not be running. The former PM insisted he had 100-plus MPs backing him, but others were sceptical.

Christopher Chope, the MP for Christchurch and a supporter of Johnson, warned on Monday that Sunak was seen as having undermined both Johnson and Truss, and could not thus expect loyalty from his own MPs. To have a mandate, Chope said, Sunak needed to call a general election.

“We’ve got a parliamentary party which is completely riven, and it’s ungovernable,” Chope told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“In a sense, that is the reason why Boris has pulled out, because obviously Rishi Sunak wasn’t prepared to guarantee him his support in the event that he was elected as leader by the party and the country.

“Unless we can have somebody as our leader in parliament who commands the support and respect of the parliamentary party, we are in effect actually ungovernable.

“Unlike Boris, who did have a mandate, we now have the prospect of having a Conservative party leader who doesn’t have the mandate from the country and won’t even have a mandate from the membership either.”

Asked if he would back Sunak if we won, Chope replied: “I supported Boris Johnson and I supported Liz Truss, and I saw before my very eyes their authority being undermined by the people who now wish to take over and inherit the crown.

“Respect is a mutual thing. If the people who are now seeking the crown want to have the respect which comes from having a mandate, then what I am saying is that the best way they can get that respect is by winning a mandate with the people, and that’s why I think a general election is essentially the only answer.

“Otherwise we’re just going to go from bad to worse. We’re going to have continuing rebellions as we try to change policies.”

Mordaunt is stuck on about 30 publicly declared MP nominations, although her team hope she could be boosted by some supporters of Johnson moving to her.

Mordaunt’s backers vowed on Sunday that she was still in the race, and on Monday morning released details of a poll they said showed she was the candidate best placed to unite the nation.

The Deltapoll survey of 4,000 voters found Mordaunt was more appealing to voters in seats the Tories had gained in 2019 than Sunak or Johnson. It also found she was seen as more trustworthy, “highlighting that she is the only candidate who can unite the country and restore trust in government”, her campaign said.

River pollution: New phosphate rules hit thousands of planned new homes

Tens of thousands of new homes face being delayed or scrapped because of river pollution that could cost the economy £16bn.

(So say developers – Owl)

By Wyre Davies www.bbc.co.uk

Experts say more phosphate, found in animal and human waste, is getting into rivers and affecting water quality.

Tougher rules on phosphate river pollution targets have been brought in – but that could affect 100,000 new-build homes in England and Wales.

Developers want governments to take urgent action to find a solution.

The pollution is a problem partly caused by us and our demand for cheap food.

That demand has driven an industry that’s threatening to overwhelm our environment, a BBC investigation has found.

Campaigners have said more needs to be done to save the UK’s rivers before it’s too late.

The building of more than 5,000 new homes are affected in Wales because of tighter phosphate pollution targets on rivers which were adopted in 2020. That could cost more than £700m to the economy.

‘Delays could cost £16bn’

The Home Builders’ Federation (HBF) contacted planning authorities and developers and calculated 100,000 homes in 74 areas in England are also affected by phosphate restrictions on housebuilding.

The HBF estimate the impact could be a £16bn loss in economic activity in England and Wales.

That figure is calculated from an industry standard model, factchecked by the BBC, that projects the financial footprint of new homebuyers, including spend in the local economy and taxes.

“We have government agency-imposed moratoriums on house building across large swathes of the country for nutrient neutrality, despite house building being a minor contributor to the issue,” said Stewart Baseley, executive chairman of the HBF.

“House building delivers growth, and it is crucial that the government re-evaluates the impacts of these costs and moratoriums and ensures that the industry is sufficiently supported such that it can deliver desperately needed new homes and the associated social and economic benefits.

“It is encouraging that after almost three years of home builders’ pleas, the government seems to be looking to find solutions, but we need urgent actions that matches the scale and urgency of the issue.”

‘Serious damage’

Natural England, a UK Government agency, said phosphate pollution is causing “serious damage” to rivers and wetlands – and the species that live in them – and made £100,000 available for each affected river catchment.

“These are also the same habitats that we need to protect us from the impacts of the climate crisis such as drought,” said Melanie Hughes of Natural England.

“Their protection and enhancement underpins our economy and our wellbeing.

“Nutrient Neutrality is a way of making sure that new housing does not add to the problem by ensuring developers can take action to reduce pollution, such as by making new wetlands.

“Together with the government, Natural England is working closely with local authorities, developers and planning authorities to create those solutions so that much needed development can take place. This is happening now.”

Wales’ First Minister Mark Drakeford held a summit with farmers’ representatives and water companies to discuss the impact of phosphate pollution on house building in the summer.

High levels of phosphate and other nutrients in rivers can lead to algal blooms and, ultimately, the loss of many species that make rivers their home, including fish, birds, invertebrates and plants that are vital to the river ecosystem.

BBC Wales Investigates has explored the problem on the River Wye that straddles the England and Wales border.

It is one of the UK’s most ecologically diverse waterway and supports wildlife like salmon, otters and kingfishers.

Warning ecosystem will ‘collapse’

The River Wye catchment is failing Joint Nature Conservation Committee targets and Natural Resources Wales (NRW) estimate almost three-quarters of phosphates entering the river are from rural land use, like farming.

“We cannot wait any longer,” said Gail Davies-Walsh of charity Afonydd Cymru, which represents river trusts in Wales.

“Quite simply, if it carries on as it is now, that ecosystem will just collapse.

“It is salvageable, but it is going to take a huge amount of working together, and it’s going to require all of those sectors to play their part in this and what we see at the moment is actually quite a lot of delays in that happening.”

Is pollution because of intensive farming?

Campaigners believe intensive poultry farming is responsible.

Data gathered by the Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales has found that, since 2008, more than 300 intensive poultry farms and farm extensions have been given planning permission in Powys, which covers a large area of the Wye.

But water quality monitoring has not been able to prove a direct link between phosphates in the river and chicken farms.

“Agriculture is part of the problem,” National Farming Union Cymru President Aled Jones told the BBC Wales Investigates programme.

“It’s a very complex issue. There are so many other contributors to the water failing in these rivers.

“We need to go with the evidence. And as that evidence is clarified, clearly, then we will respond.”

Water monitoring across the UK is limited but a team at Lancaster University modelled how much muck is being generated in the Wye catchment.

They found 7,500 tonnes of phosphorus is generated in the River Wye catchment every year from animal muck.

Crops in that area can only absorb around 4,500 tonnes of that muck – leaving a surplus.

“Fundamentally, if you have a surplus, you have too much phosphorus in your environment, it’s likely that you’re going to have worse water quality,” said Dr Shane Rothwell of Lancaster University.

Can a manmade wetlands stop river pollution?

Near the Wye in Herefordshire, building has started on the first wetlands in the UK to be funded by developers buying what is being described as “phosphate credits”.

Such measures aim to stop putting more nutrients, like phosphate, into rivers – similar to carbon offsetting.

The wetlands in the village of Luston, near Leominster, should prevent 200kg of phosphate going into the river every year.

Developer Merry Albright has 52 house builds on hold due to the phosphate restrictions but is benefitting from the wetlands scheme.

‘Developers don’t mind doing more for biodiversity’

She said: “New housing didn’t cause this problem and yet we are being blamed and also being asked to pay for a solution which won’t really fix the bigger problem.

“I’m happy to do the best for the environment so I’m not seeking someone to eradicate the red tape but I would like people to focus on what caused this and what is needed to be done to fix it.”

In England, Defra said they have tripled their workforce in the last two years and increased farm inspections from 300 to 1700 a year. They added they plan to expand to 4,000 inspections annually.

In Wales, it’s NRW’s job to enforce water quality regulations. They are negotiating with Welsh government to get extra funding to police the new pollution rules.

“It is key having people on the ground to deliver,” said Siân Williams of NRW.

“That’s why we’re looking into not just external funded programmes that are temporary, but we’re also looking at our baseline funding with Welsh Government.”

Wales’ Rural Affairs Minister Lesley Griffiths said the Welsh Government had already been working to make “quick gains” as well as long term solutions.

“Of course, I’m part of the solution, just as other people are,” she said. “We all have to take responsibility each and every one of us.”

Boris Johnson exit from Tory leadership race avoids likely humiliation

Yesterday’s man – Owl

For all Boris Johnson’s habitually coy language about his leadership ambitions, one thing is abundantly clear: he only withdraws from a political race if he thinks he cannot win it. And so it was on Sunday night.

Peter Walker www.theguardian.com 

The former prime minister’s statement confirming his decision to not stand was a classic of this Johnson genre: equal parts bullish insistence about his own ability to triumph, and a pretend modesty that he is choosing another path for the sake of unity.

In reality many observers – and many Conservative MPs – remain deeply dubious about Johnson’s claim that he had secured the support of 102 parliamentary colleagues, given that fewer than half this number had said so publicly.

There will be similar scepticism about Johnson’s insistence that, once on the ballot, he would most likely triumph in a vote of party members, and then stand a good chance of winning the next general election.

The first of those was not impossible, especially as Rishi Sunak, by now an apparent near-certainty to become the next prime minister, remains far from hugely popular with Tory members, some of whom blame him for precipitating Johnson’s downfall in July by resigning as chancellor.

But probably the very best outcome Johnson could have hoped for would be to emerge as the leader of a party where about two-third of its MPs think he is unfit for office, some even threatening to defect or resign if he took over again.

Far more humiliating would be to not make the 100-nomination threshold. Those who know Johnson portray him as a politician who, even by the standards of the trade, lives on adulation and approval. If he cannot feel wanted he would rather not be involved.

So it was in 2016, fresh from being hailed by Brexiters as the defining reason for the Vote Leave victory, with Johnson billed as one of the frontrunners to succeed David Cameron.

That time events were even more dramatic, but followed a similar narrative. Just before Johnson was due to formally declare, Michael Gove, his ally and Vote Leave partner, announced he believed Johnson was unsuited to the job and that he would stand instead. Johnson, his hopes badly damaged, gave up.

On Sunday, Johnson followed his prediction that he could win the race if he chose to by adding: “But in the course of the last days I have sadly come to the conclusion that this would simply not be the right thing to do.”

Much like the supposed 102 backers, many Tory MPs or others who have closely observed Johnson will greet that sentence with something of a hollow laugh.

Johnson would like the world to believe he is withdrawing for the sake of party unity, or the national good. But if he genuinely cherished those things he would not have launched a new bid to become PM little more than three months after he was forced out by more than 50 ministerial resignations, and with the threat of an official inquiry into whether he misled parliament hanging above his head.

Perhaps the one part of Johnson’s statement that is sincere, if not necessarily accurate, is when he states: “I believe I have much to offer but I am afraid that this is simply not the right time.”

Johnson very much does believe he was unfairly forced out and should be granted another go. He also perhaps believes that in political times as fevered as this he could yet make a comeback.

But while definitive predictions are perilous, this does seem self-comforting, even delusional. Johnson returned from yet another holiday during the parliamentary session to be greeted by some former acolytes sycophantically greeting him on social media as “boss”.

But there were not many. Among Sunak’s 140-plus confirmed backers were the likes of Suella Braverman, Kemi Badenoch and Steve Baker, from the previously Johnsonite right of the party.

Even if he does not fully realise it yet, Johnson is now the Conservative party’s yesterday man. To borrow Cameron’s damning putdown of Tony Blair: he was the future once.

Warning of ‘constitutional crisis’ if Boris Johnson returns as PM in face of opposition from MPs

If the contest for the next PM results in a vote of the Conservative party members, Conservative MPs will conduct an indicative vote.

As Politico Newsletter explained: the point of the indicative vote is to either (1) encourage the losing candidate to stand down so a new PM can be in place on Monday night or (2) show the mad, swivel-eyed loons in the membership who to vote for this time.

Reassured? – Owl

Andrew Woodcock www.independent.co.uk 

Supporters of Rishi Sunak have warned of a “constitutional crisis” if Boris Johnson becomes the second prime minister in succession to be elected by Tory members in the face of opposition from the party’s MPs.

The former PM may find himself faced with a boycott of his government by MPs along the lines of the mass resignation that forced his departure in July, said one minister, who warned that Mr Johnson would not last until 2023, let alone the general election expected in 2024.

The warning came after the Johnson camp sensationally claimed to have secured the promise of the 100 MPs’ signatures he needs to enter the race to succeed Liz Truss, apparently dashing Mr Sunak’s hopes of an uncontested coronation on Monday.

But the claim by Johnson ally Sir James Duddridge was greeted with deep scepticism by Sunak supporters, with one challenging him to “prove it” and another retorting that the supposed hidden army of “Bring Back Boris” MPs “don’t exist”.

“If Boris has 100 in the bag, why is his campaign putting out pics of him begging for votes?” asked Poole MP Sir Robert Syms.

With Sir James saying only that 100 MPs were “prepared to sign nomination papers”, there were suspicions in the Sunak camp that Mr Johnson was laying the ground for a face-saving announcement that, while he had the necessary support, he felt the time was not right for him to return to frontline politics.

Earlier on Saturday, the Johnson campaign appeared to be sputtering to a halt before it was even formally confirmed, despite winning the high-profile endorsement of former home secretary Priti Patel.

While Mr Sunak sped past the 100-nomination threshold late on Friday, Mr Johnson appeared becalmed on the declared support of a little over half that figure, and was hit by former close allies David Frost, Dominic Raab and Steve Barclay – his erstwhile Brexit negotiator, deputy prime minister and chief of staff – all declaring for his rival.

Mr Sunak was also boosted by the backing of trade secretary Kemi Badenoch, who ran a well-regarded bid for the leadership in the summer and is seen as a rising star.

If two contenders clear the nominations hurdle on Monday, MPs will hold an “indicative” vote to give members a clear steer on how much support each candidate enjoys in the Commons – and to give the second-placed candidate the chance to pull out if they trail by an overwhelming margin.

But the Johnson team believe that if the ex-PM can get onto the ballot paper alongside Mr Sunak, even in second place, he can sweep to victory on the back of members’ votes in an online vote set to conclude on Friday.

Apparently spooked by the prospect of Mr Johnson gathering the necessary support to run, a series of Sunak supporters issued statements warning of the dire consequences for the party if activists impose another leader against MPs’ will.

“Being elected the leader of the largest party in parliament, but without being able to form a stable government, would be a new set of circumstances which could lead to constitutional crisis and early general election in chaotic circumstances,” said trade minister Greg Hands.

His warning came as The Independent’s petition calling for an immediate general election passed 360,000 signatures.

Mr Hands claimed that the former PM had offered him the cabinet role of Northern Ireland secretary as he struggled to fill government posts amid an exodus of ministers in July.

“I think he would have offered me almost anything,” said Mr Hands. “I refused.”

And he warned that the situation could be repeated under a second Johnson premiership: “Some of my colleagues think he could win a 2024 general election. But if you can’t form a workable, effective and stable government, you’ll never get to 2023, let alone 2024.”

And former cabinet minister Robert Jenrick warned that the scandals that had forced Mr Johnson out of office “remain unresolved”, while the newly jittery markets would no longer tolerate the former prime minister’s “fiscal cakeism”.

“There may be another moment for Boris, but now is not the time for him to take back the reins,” said Mr Jenrick.

Mr Raab warned that a Johnson premiership would plunge the country and the Tory party back, Groundhog Day-style, into the Partygate “soap opera”, with the PM forced to give evidence on camera to an inquiry by the privileges committee into alleged lies to parliament, the outcome of which could lead to his removal as an MP.

With Penny Mordaunt so far the only contender formally to declare her candidacy, a Tory MP who quit the government ahead of Mr Johnson’s downfall in July told The Independent she hoped the former prime minister would not put himself forward.

“I hope he has some integrity left and will not stand,” said the MP. “Whilst the standards investigation is ongoing it is wrong. He cannot unite the party that he divided.

“While Boris is popular with the electorate, we need to calm the markets and bring back the brilliant voices and wisdom that have been returned to the back bench in the interests of the country and the economy – not one man’s political ambition.”

Meanwhile, long-serving Tory MPs Sir Roger Gale and Andrew Bridgen declared that they were ready to decline the Conservative whip and sit in parliament as independents if Mr Johnson was re-elected for a second stint at 10 Downing Street.

And a flash survey of members of the Tory Reform Group found 86 per cent saying they did not want Mr Johnson back. The group’s chair, Flora Coleman, said his return would spark an exodus of moderates from the party.

“We have seen that the party’s centrist members have been ‘quiet quitting’ for years,” said Ms Coleman. “It’s clear the return of Johnson would finally end the relationship for many.”

Mr Johnson returned to the UK from a Caribbean holiday on an overnight plane arriving at Gatwick early on Saturday, and immediately took to the phones to drum up support.

Supporters released photos of a determined but tired-looking Mr Johnson on the phone in a grey suit, doing a thumbs-up in front of a union jack flag.

Backer Andrew Stephenson said that many of the more than 60 MPs who had quit government posts in protest at Mr Johnson’s behaviour in July now regret forcing him out.

“I have heard lots of MPs who now feel that they were rash to judge him before the summer, rash to encourage him to resign then, and now feel that this is somebody who – in terms of the big national and international challenges we face – has very good judgement, and therefore at a difficult time for the country we need him back,” the former Tory chair told BBC Radio 4’s Today.

But the Labour chair of the Commons standards committee, Chris Bryant, said Mr Johnson was a “disgraced” figure who was “unfit for office”.

Mr Bryant said that if elected PM, Mr Johnson would spend the first months of his second premiership “entirely focused” on the contempt probe by the separate privileges committee.

And he added that he could then, “at the end of it, be found to have been in contempt of parliament, suspended from the House of Commons, and potentially facing a by-election in a seat which he would lose”.