Covid: About 20% of Devon cases in care homes

About 20% of all Covid-19 cases in Devon in the last week have been in care homes, the county’s director of public health has said.

BBC News www.bbc.co.uk

Steve Brown said there had been some “significant outbreaks” with up to 80% of residents or staff in some homes testing positive.

He said some of those were asymptomatic and others had symptoms and were in hospital.

Mr Brown also urged people to follow lockdown restrictions.

‘Chain of transmission’

At a Team Devon Local Outbreak Engagement Board meeting, Mr Brown, said: “We are seeing increasing outbreaks in care homes and have had some significant outbreaks with 70 or 80% of residents or staff testing positive.

“It is important to re-emphasise the stay at home message unless it is essential to go out.

“Every time you leave the front door, you risk coming into contact with someone who may have Covid and could be a crucial link in the chain of transmission.”

Simon Chant, public health specialist, said that while Devon’s case rates were at the highest they had been, they were still only a third of the rate of the national average.

Mr Chant said there were some positive signs that growth in cases was slowing.

“But we have seen a big increase in the 80+ cohort where there is a greater likelihood of hospitalisation and more severe outcomes for the age group, and we are seeing outbreaks in care homes again.”

Across the county, between 2 and 8 January, people aged 80 and over had an infection rate of 396 per 100,000 population, the highest of any age range, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.

Break lockdown rules: “end up in a police cell”

People who break lockdown restrictions risk catching Covid-19 and dying, Devon and Cornwall’s chief constable has said.

BBC local news

Shaun Sawyer called on people to comply with the rules and keep their distance from others to stop that happening.

He said in the first week of lockdown Devon and Cornwall Police had “sadly” issued more fines than most forces in the United Kingdom.

He said the force received just under 1,000 calls from the public.

There had also been 433 “interactions” and 49 fines issued.

Asked what he expected from the weekend, he said: “I am expecting too many people to get Covid-19 and die if we carry on.

“That is what I am expecting so let’s not make that happen.”

Mr Sawyer said most people were doing the best they could but were still too close to each other in shops and while exercising.

“People are infecting each other even when they are trying to comply because they are not getting that distancing,” he said.

“The infection rate has never been higher in the South West so we need to be on our game better than ever.”

Mr Sawyer said getting in a car to travel for exercise should be “extraordinarily rare” in Devon and Cornwall, with the sea, coastline and rural communities.

He added: “For the few that breach this weekend, you are going to not only get a ticket but I think increasingly you are going to end up in a police cell.”

Devon farm joins global cohort for trailblazing regenerative farming pilot

Regenerative farms spanning four continents, including the Westcountry, have been enlisted to take part in the pilot of a trailblazing new certification scheme.

Athwenna Irons www.devonlive.com

Following the recent reveal of its newest label, Certified Regenerative, non-profit certifier A Greener World (AGW) has selected over 50 farmers to join the programme’s trial phase.

The certification will provide a whole-farm assurance of sustainability – measuring benefits for soil, water, air, biodiversity, infrastructure, animal welfare and social responsibility.

A Greener World (AGW) UK identifies, audits, certifies and promotes practical, sustainable farming systems by supporting farmers and informing consumers

A Greener World (AGW) UK identifies, audits, certifies and promotes practical, sustainable farming systems by supporting farmers and informing consumers (Image: A Greener World (AGW))

Key features of the programme include transparent, rigorous standards; high animal welfare; a holistic, farmer-led approach; early and broad access to regenerative markets; and a pragmatic, science-based approach.

Building on AGW’s growing family of trusted labels, which includes Certified Animal Welfare Approved by AGW, Certified Grassfed by AGW and Certified Non-GMO by AGW, the first fully Certified Regenerative by AGW farms and products are expected to be announced later this year.

Wayne Copp, executive director of AGW UK / Europe, said: “The term ‘regenerative’ is already being thrown around like ‘sustainable’ was a decade ago, and is being used to ‘greenwash’ products or make them seem more environmentally sustainable than they are.

“Our new Certified Regenerative by AGW programme seeks to protect farmers and consumers by establishing clear standards and a label that farmers and consumers can trust to deliver a genuinely positive outcome: on the farm, at the table, and for the planet.”

Interest in the Certified Regenerative by AGW programme has been “overwhelming”, added Mr Copp, who farms in Woolacombe, North Devon. “The excellent applications made for a difficult selection process, but we are thrilled with the results.

“We know that truly regenerative farming requires accountability to each other and to all of the communities to which we belong—whether they be plant, animal, human, or the environment we all share. We have been humbled by the groundswell of interest from farmers and eaters alike and look forward to sharing our collective journey.”

Amelia Millman and Jason Greenway checking their herd of cattle at Springwater Farm, on the National Trust's Killerton Estate in East Devon

Amelia Millman and Jason Greenway checking their herd of cattle at Springwater Farm, on the National Trust’s Killerton Estate in East Devon (Image: Springwater Farm)

The core feature of Certified Regenerative by AGW is a five-year Regenerative Plan developed in partnership with the farmer, whereby farmers and experts assess risk, set goals and track progress toward meaningful milestones. Experienced agricultural advisors at the UK’s Farming & Wildlife Advisory Group (FWAG) will also be providing training and support in the development of regenerative plans.

Mr Copp said the role of AGW is to assess farms’ compliance with their own plan. “Currently most regenerative claims are not verified at all, and the few verified labels are either limited in scope or require Organic certification as a prerequisite, excluding the vast majority of farmland and hardwiring practices which are inherently not regenerative,” he continued.

Pilot farms were selected based on a variety of factors including agricultural experience, regenerative principles, market or educational impact and geographical diversity. With products ranging from grass-fed lamb to herbs and vegetables, the cohort of farms spread throughout the UK, Australia, Namibia, South Africa, Canada and the USA will partner AGW over the coming year to evaluate standards, plans and auditing procedures – allowing the programme to be trialled and assessed in a range of environments, climates and socioeconomic parameters.

Among the pilot participants is AGW-certified farmer and National Trust tenant, Amelia Millman, who farms at Springwater Farm in Devon alongside her partner, Jason Greenway.

She said: “As young farmers, we are pleased to be part of the Certified Regenerative by AGW pilot, working in close partnership with the National Trust’s Killerton Estate in Devon towards achieving both the National Trust’s and our own regenerative farming aspirations.

“As one of the new generation of British farmers, we want to promote high welfare and sustainable farming practices as much as possible. Working with the National Trust and being part of A Greener World’s pilot regenerative certification will help us to reach that full potential and protect the estate for future generations to enjoy.”

Exmouth chooses two schemes to get £300k

Exmouth residents and voluntary groups have voted to spend £300,000 on two large projects in the town. Last year, a random selected number of households were asked to choose from a list of seven community causes.

Radio Exe News www.radioexe.co.uk

The leading two schemes will each cost £150,000. The cash, known as section 106 money, is taken by East Devon District Council from developers in return for being allowed to build housing.

Just over a thousand households voted. Now the money will be spent on resurfacing a sand astro pitch at Exmouth Community College which is at the end of its life. It’s used by community groups in the evenings, as well as the college for sports including football, hockey, rounders, soft ball, American football, handball, tag rugby, athletics and cricket. Just over half (52%) of respondents said it should receive funding.

The second project is to buy new sports-related equipment for Brixington park, which will be free to use by all. One end of a tarmacked games area with one goal for sports such as football and basketball and side panels for target practise. Outdoor gym equipment will go in too, along with improvements to the informal pitch in the middle of the park, including some drainage improvements, some levelling and new football goals. Out of all households that voted, 41% voted for this project. 

A bit of administrative faffing about has to take place before East Devon District Council can release the funds. Together with Exmouth Town Council, they’re subsquently hoping to work down the list of projects as far as possible and appropriate over the next three years.

The other projects, in order of how many votes they received were:

A free to use concrete track with bumps and small slopes for wheeled sports such as BMX, skateboards and scooters in Carter Avenue Park.                                                                                                                                

Asking for: £60,000. Out of all households that voted, 37% chose this project.

Expanding the current concrete skate park in Phear Park, which is free to use. This is used by skateboarders, scooters and BMX riders. 

Asking for: £240,000. Out of all households that voted, 37% voted for this project.

A back stretch / back exercise wall in Phear Park with exercises listed along its length, this would be free to use. This would help people of all ages to straighten and strengthen their backs and necks.Asking for £5,000. Out of all households that voted,23% voted for this project. 

A new drainage system at Exmouth Rugby Club for the two pitches and grass area next to Marine Way, allowing them to be able to be used more often. Matches and training are often called off because of waterlogged pitches.  Asking for: £210,000. Out of all households that voted, 23% voted for this project.

Additional car parking area at Withycombe Raleigh Common Football Pitches, home of the Brixington Blues and used by other clubs and teams. This would increase the usability of the pitches and make the parking safer.  Asking for: £40,000. Out of all households that voted, 20% voted for this project. 

East Devon District Council were already aware of the local support for Phear Park skate park expansion, and had sought funding through their own capital bids process in case the scheme did not receive enough votes in the s106 sports voting. This capital funding was approved by East Devon District Council’s Budget Setting and Capital Allocations Panel and Joint Overview and Scrutiny Committee. If this is approved by their Full Council meeting in early February, East Devon District Council would pay for expansion of the skate park and start this project during 2021. 

In addition, now East Devon District Council are aware of the popularity of the free-to-use concrete track with bumps and small slopes for wheeled sports, they will also start investigating how they might be able to deliver this, if it isn’t soon funded by additional section 106 monies.

Chairman of Exmouth Town Council’s section 106/community infrastructure levy working party, Councillor Fred Caygill said: “I am pleased to say that finally we have a result on the public vote for the allocation of Section 106 funds for community sports projects in Exmouth. health and wellbeing are two particularly important subjects that we should all be encouraging in all sectors and at all levels.”

Councillor Sarah Jackson, East Devon District Council’s portfolio holder for democracy and transparency said: “Despite the ongoing pandemic, ‘the show must go on’ wherever practicable and safe

to do so. It is important that Section 106 money is put to good use within our communities as intended…The 1,082 households that responded represent a great many more individuals across all age groups, which is surely a triumph.

East Devon District Council shortlisted for Hearts for the Arts Award

In response to being shortlisted, Councillor Paul Arnott, Leader of East Devon District Council said:

The council is really proud of this great achievement from our excellent officers and staff at Thelma Hulbert Gallery and Wild East Devon. This is a high-level arts prize and it is a great accolade even to be nominated. Good luck to the team for the final judging on Valentine’s Day!

www.thedevondaily.co.uk

The shortlist has been announced for the National Campaign for the Arts’ (NCA) Hearts For The Arts Awards 2021. The awards celebrate the unsung heroes of Local Authorities who are championing the arts against all odds.

East Devon District Council has been nominated for Best Arts Project for the Creative Cabin – a brightly coloured, instantly recognizable, mobile unit taking nature and culture on tour in a ‘Recovery Roadshow’, through months of the pandemic.

This year’s winners will be selected from the shortlist by a judging panel of key arts industry experts and practitioners, including:

Le Gateau Chocolat, Drag artiste and cabaret performer

Paul Hartnoll, musician, composer, founder member of Orbital

Adrian Lester CBE, actor and director

Petra Roberts, Cultural Development Manager, Hackney Council (2020 winners for the Windrush Generations Festival)

Samuel West, actor, director, Chair of the National Campaign for the Arts

Despite the incredible hardships faced by Local Authorities in 2020, this year’s awards have seen the NCA receive a record-breaking number of nominations, as local communities turned to the arts for solace, strength and connectivity during the pandemic. 

Nominations were received from across the UK for each of the three award categories: Best Arts Project; Best Arts Champion – Local Authority or Cultural Trust Worker; and Best Arts Champion – Councillor.

The shortlist was judged by representatives from some of this year’s partners in the awards: Culture Counts; Wales Council for Voluntary Action; Local Government Association; National Campaign for the Arts; and Voluntary Arts Wales.

Discussing East Devon’s nomination Hearts for the Arts Award partners said about the Creative Cabin:

An example of vital innovation blending arts and sciences, to create accessible opportunities for all, to learn and share in any environment. It is a fantastic project, and the way the team have diversified their working due to Covid and brought a much-needed safe space to people who are isolated, lonely and struggling with mental health conditions, is to be applauded.

In response to being shortlisted, Councillor Paul Arnott, Leader of East Devon District Council said:

The council is really proud of this great achievement from our excellent officers and staff at Thelma Hulbert Gallery and Wild East Devon. This is a high-level arts prize and it is a great accolade even to be nominated. Good luck to the team for the final judging on Valentine’s Day!

The winners of the Hearts for the Arts Awards 2021 will be announced on Valentine’s Day, 14th February.

The National Campaign for the Arts present the Hearts for the Arts Awards each year. The awards are delivered by the NCA, in partnership with Culture Counts; the Local Government Association; Thrive; UK Theatre; Voluntary Arts Wales, Wales Council for Voluntary Action.

For more information on the shortlisted nominees visitforthearts.org.uk/campaigns/hearts-for-the-arts/

Is the story on Vaccine roll-out being spun?

From Today’s Western Morning News with similar report in last night’s BBC Spotlight:

More people have been vaccinated against coronavirus in the South West than in London, as new figures reveal a patchy start to the vaccine roll-out.

A total of 285,332 in the South West were vaccinated up to January 10 across all six counties in the region. By comparison in London, the worst-hit region for the disease, 237,524 jabs have been administered.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan said he was “hugely concerned” that Londoners have received only a tenth of the vaccines that have been given across the country.

The news came as three regions of England, the South West, North West and West Midlands, all recorded a rise in Covid-19 cases rates over the past week, against a national trend of a slight fall.

London, the East Midlands, eastern England, north-east England, south-east England and Yorkshire & the Humber all saw a fall in case rates.

BBC Spotlight used the interesting phrase “wider South West” because, as Owl keeps pointing out, the formal regional definition of the “South West” includes, to the east: Bristol, Gloucester and Wiltshire.

It is the largest of the nine regions in England. What happens in Bristol is not necessarily representative of what happens here.

From Sidmouth Nub News sidmouth.nub.news:

An update on the Covid-19 vaccinations being given to Sidmouth residents, including the imminent availability of the ‘Oxford’ jab, was among the issues covered at the virtual meeting of the town’s Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday, January 13. Here’s a report of the meeting, by the Chamber’s president Richard Eley.

A well-attended Sidmouth Chamber of Commerce breakfast meeting, conducted by Zoom, included an enlightening Q & A session with Dr Mike Slot, of the Sidmouth Practice. Dr Slot was able to answer a large number of questions from attendees, and to describe how the roll-out of the vaccine was being undertaken in our area.

At the present time, vaccine is being supplied to Exmouth and is only of the Pfizer variety, which requires storage at very low temperatures. It is expected that the AstraZenaca ’Oxford’ jab, which is more easily distributed, will be available shortly.

Dr Slot explained that the required infrastructure was in place locally to deliver the vaccine, and that the only constraint was one of supply. Sidmouth is lucky to have a delivery team in place, including several retired local doctors who had made themselves available.  

Speaker ERUPTS: Sir Lindsay Hoyle slams UK Ministers over poor answers ‘Not good enough!’

After Simon Jupp MP tried to help Boris out of another “Hoyle” hole, the previous day, by changing the subject. Despite being a “friend at court” our Simon received, in Owl’s opinion, only Boris bluster in reply.

THE Speaker of the House of Commons aimed a furious warning at UK Government Ministers for not providing full and thorough answers to questions from Opposition MPs. [Thursday]

Speaker slams MPs for ‘not respecting’ opposition questions

Sir Lindsay Hoyle issued the warning to Conservative MPs, telling them that the International Trade debate on the future of Brexit Britain in Parliament had “not been very good”. Sir Lindsay reminded UK Ministers that all MPs are representing a constituency and their questions deserve proper respect. 

The Speaker said: “What I will say is that these questions have not been good.

“I am beginning to worry that we have very good answers to one side of the chamber and the answers to the others are not getting the respect they deserve.

“In fact, we had one occasion when it ‘not our responsibility’ and then when another member asked it is our responsibility.

“I want us to be concise in the treatment and the way in which we deal with all members of this house.

“They are representing constituencies and I expect them to get full and thorough answers.

“And not the political games of all sides that seem to be being played.”

The previous day [Wednesday] during Prime Minister’s Questions Simon Jupp posed his question after this exchange on the last question from Sir Keir Starmer concerning the contents of free school meals.

Photo of Keir Starmer Keir Starmer Leader of Her Majesty’s Official Opposition, Leader of the Labour Party

The Prime Minister says that the parcels are “disgraceful”, but it should not have taken social media to shame the Prime Minister into action. Like the Education Secretary, he blames others, and he invites me to hold him to account, so let me do that because blaming others, Prime Minister, is not as simple as that, is it?

I have checked the Government guidance on free school meals—the current guidance, published by the Department for Education. I have it here. It sets out an

“Example parcel for one child for five days”— the Department for Education, Prime Minister; you want to be held to account—

“1 loaf of bread…2 baking potatoes…block of cheese…baked beans…3 individual” yoghurts. Sound familiar? They are the images, Prime Minister, you just called “disgraceful”. The only difference I can see with this list and what the Prime Minister has described as “disgraceful” is a tin of sweetcorn, a packet of ham and a bottle of milk. He blames others, but this is on his watch. The truth is, families come last under this Government, whether it is exams, free school meals or childcare. Will the Prime Minister undertake—he wants to be held to account—to take down this guidance by the close of play today and ensure that all our children can get a decent meal during the pandemic?

Boris Johnson The Prime Minister, Leader of the Conservative Party, The Prime Minister

The right hon. and learned Gentleman’s words would be less hypocritical and absurd if it were not for the fact that the—

Photo of Lindsay Hoyle Lindsay Hoyle Speaker of the House of Commons,

I do not believe anybody is a hypocrite in this Chamber. I think we need to be a little bit careful about what we are saying to each other. There was a “not true” earlier and there were also comparisons to others. Please, let us keep discipline in this Chamber and respect for each other. We are tidying up how this Parliament behaves and I certainly expect the leadership of both parties to ensure that that takes place. Prime Minister, would you like to withdraw the word “hypocrisy”?

Photo of Boris Johnson Boris Johnson The Prime Minister, Leader of the Conservative Party, The Prime Minister

I am delighted to be advised by you, Mr Speaker. Let me confine my criticism to the absurdity—which I hope is acceptable, Mr Speaker—of the right hon. and learned Gentleman attacking us over free school meals when it was a Conservative Government that instituted free school meals—universally approved— not a Labour Government. Of the £280 billion that we have spent securing the jobs and livelihoods of people across this country, uprating universal credit and, in addition, increasing the living wage by record amounts this year and last year, as well as increasing the local housing allowance, the overwhelming majority of benefits—the bulk of the measures—fall in favour of the poorest and the neediest in society, which is what this House would expect.

The right hon. and learned Gentleman takes one position one week and one position the next. That is what he does. That has been his whole lamentable approach—if I can get away with lamentable, Mr Speaker—throughout this pandemic. He says he supports the vaccine now. He says he supports the vaccine roll-out, and he tries to associate himself with it because he senses that it is going well, but be in no doubt, that that was the party that wanted us—this country—to stay in the European Union vaccine programme. That is absolutely true. He stood on a manifesto, which he has not repudiated, to dismantle the very pharmaceutical companies that have created this miracle of science, which is true—

Photo of Lindsay Hoyle Lindsay Hoyle Speaker of the House of Commons,

Prime Minister, there are questions and sometimes we have got to try to answer the question that was asked of you. To run through the history is one thing, but in fairness, it is Prime Minister’s questions. It was the final question. We have lots of others to go through, so I think I am now going to move on to Simon Jupp in Sidmouth, who is desperate to ask a question of you, Prime Minister.

Photo of Simon Jupp Simon Jupp Conservative, East Devon

The hospitality industry is the lifeblood of East Devon. Our pubs, restaurants, cafés and hotels provide thousands of jobs, places to meet and places to stay. The generous support package now put in place will tide many of these businesses over for now, but they will need further support. Will my right hon. Friend consider extending the VAT cut for hospitality to give them a helping hand when they are back open for business?

Photo of Boris Johnson Boris Johnson The Prime Minister, Leader of the Conservative Party, The Prime Minister

I am grateful to my hon. Friend. I know that my right hon. Friend the Chancellor has done everything he can to help businesses throughout this pandemic, and that is why he has extended the grants and why we have the cuts for both the VAT and for business rates. We will do everything we can to help as we go forward, but the best thing would of course be to ensure that we roll out this vaccine programme and bounce back as fast as possible. Any further announcements my right hon. Friend makes will be well ahead of 31 March, by which time we intend to have a Budget.

Over 300,000 of us tell government: don’t push through bad planning changes – CPRE

As we hand in a huge petition against planning changes, our campaigns officer Sam Keyte takes a look at the campaign – and what happens next.

By Sam Keyte 8th December 2020 www.cpre.org.uk

CPRE has today partnered with campaigners from Sum of Us and 38 Degrees to head to Westminster, where we handed in our petitions showing your calls for the government to stop disastrous plans to change our planning laws.

We’ve worked with these other campaigning organisations to offer up a chance for people to have their say on the government’s damaging new ideas for our planning system, and the numbers of you signing our petition says it loud and clear: we won’t be silenced.

We launched this campaign in August 2020, when the government published unnecessary and damaging plans that would dismantle the planning rules (if you want to know more about what impact these laws and systems have on our lives, our potted guide will explain all).

‘The numbers of you signing our petition says it loud and clear: we won’t be silenced.’

The ideas that the government had come up with would hand power over to developers, taking it away from local councils and communities – leading to untold levels of damage to the countryside and the people living and working in it.

Local people weren’t happy – our local county groups told us in overwhelming numbers of the grave concerns they had – and our campaign was born. We launched our petition demanding that the government doesn’t silence communities when deciding what gets built and where – and we were delighted to see so many of you getting mobilised and adding your names.

Strength in numbers… big numbers

The combined total number of signatures on the petitions was a whopping 310,265 people. This is an amazing number, demonstrating the huge level of opposition the government is facing from the public in trying to push through changes – changes that can only stand to harm local democracy and our countryside.

A bright graphic image showing people celebrating the number 310,265

We were delighted to see so many of you add your voices and stand up for local democracy

People raising their voices has been a crucial way to build pressure against the government’s ideas and boost momentum since the campaign launched in August. We’re celebrating this brilliant moment for local democracy: rather than let our voices be squeezed out of plans for local building and development, you’ve helped us to assert that local people are here and won’t be silenced.

‘We want to take a moment to celebrate what we have achieved together.’

And so we wanted to thank everyone for being involved in this journey so far. There will be more twists and turns to come, but this is a momentous point of the campaign, and we want to take a moment to celebrate what we have achieved together over the past few months.

In good company

It’s been great to see that we’ve not been alone in realising that the big changes that the Minister for Housing first announced in the summer of 2020 included some very bad ideas. As well as the overwhelming public opposition shown by the petitions, there’s been huge pushback from politicians, including from the government’s own party.

We commissioned a poll of MPs and found that over half of Conservative MPs weren’t happy with the proposals – the same proposals that had come from their own party! So it came as no surprise to us to see a fiery debate in the House of Commons where 46 MPs spoke out against the plans – and even more wanted to, but the debate simply ran out of time.

Of these 46 MPs publicly voicing their unhappiness with the suggested changes, a huge 33 were from the Conservative Party – including former Prime Minister Theresa May. The issues that they were raising were just as we’ve been saying for many months: that the plans would lead to building on green spaces near to where people live (the very local green spaces that have been so important to so many of us during the pandemic year); that fewer homes that people could actually afford to live in would be built; and that the chances for people to get involved in shaping the future of where they live would be eroded.

And it’s not just the government’s own MPs who have problems with the plans. Organisations from across the environmental, housing and planning sectors have come together to say a big NO to the existing proposals. We were one of more than 30 groups who sent a letter to the Prime Minister warning of the disastrous impacts on nature and people if he dismantled the planning system.

We feel like winners

So, after months of intense campaigning (and more to come), where are we now? Here at CPRE, we’re feeling positive and excited about winning this campaign. We know these plans can be changed. We’ve done it all before – we helped local people to stop fracking in its tracks.

And just a week or so ago, the government looked like they are starting to take our concerns seriously, and may be rethinking one of the most damaging parts of the proposals. We’ll be keeping a close eye on these changes and will keep you informed.

2021 is coming. We’ll continue to demonstrate better ways that things can be done and push the government to change these ill-advised plans. The petition we handed in today is a big moment and a great milestone in the campaign. We’re proud to have been able to raise our voices together – and we’ll keep doing it.

Be a part of it. Join us now, or sign up for our emails to hear the latest news on the campaign each month.

Free School Meal vouchers to return after backlash over ‘disgraceful’ food hampers – how to claim them and who is eligible

Marcus Rashford scores another goal! – Owl

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has branded some of the free school meal offerings sent to families as “disgraceful” after images of the meagre food parcels went viral online.

www.portsmouth.co.uk

Speaking to the Commons Education Select Committee, Education Secretary Gavin Williamson said that he was “absolutely disgusted” after seeing a picture of one of the food packages sent to a disabled mother of two.

Williamson said that the national voucher scheme for free school meals will be re-launched next week after the government faced urgent calls to bring back the programme.

He said: “All schools still have the option of doing locally procured vouchers if that is the route they want to do, but the national scheme will be available from next week.”

‘They’re appalling’

Johnson told the Commons: “I don’t think anybody in this House is happy with the disgraceful images that we’ve seen of the food parcels being offered. They’re appalling, they’re an insult to the families that have received them.”

The Prime Minister added: “It’s not good enough. You can’t assume households have other ingredients to make the lunches, and clearly the packages were totally and woefully inaccurate.”

His comments come after Manchester United footballer Marcus Rashford tweeted that he had spoken to the Prime Minister in regards to the parcels.

He wrote: “Just had a good conversation with the prime minister. He assured me that he is committed to correcting the issue with the food hampers and that a full review of the supply chain is taking place.

“He agrees that images of hampers being shared on Twitter are unacceptable.”

Rashford has long campaigned to keep children fed during the pandemic with free school meals.

‘Government response has been far too slow’

Tulip Siddiq, Shadow Children and Early Years Minister, criticised how long it has taken for the government to take action.

She said: “The government’s response has yet again been far too slow, with national food vouchers only becoming available from next week – two weeks after schools moved to remote learning.

“Children are going hungry now – this cannot wait.”

Your child may be able to get free school meals if you receive any of the following:

Income supportIncome-based Jobseeker’s AllowanceIncome-related Employment and Support AllowanceSupport under Part IV of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999The guaranteed element of Pension CreditChild Tax Credit (provided you’re not also entitled to Working Tax Credit, and have an annual gross income of no more than £16,190)Working Tax Credit run-on – paid for four weeks after you stop qualifying for Working Tax CreditUniversal Credit – if you apply on or after 1 April 2018 your household income must be less than £7,400 a year (after tax and not including any benefits you get)

Children who get these benefits directly, instead of through a parent or guardian, can also get free school meals.

Additionally, your child may be able to get free school meals if you get any of these benefits and your child is both:

Younger than the compulsory age for starting schoolIn full time education

In regards to infant free school meals, your child will be able to get free school meals in they’re in a government funded school and in:

Reception classYear 1Year 2

Tell your local authority if you also get any of the qualifying benefits. Your child’s school can get extra funding if you do.

How to apply

To apply for the free school meals, you’ll need to enter your postcode into the postcode checker on the government website here.

Based on your postcode, the checker will direct you to the relevant page on your local authorities website.

Different councils have different methods of application – for example, some websites will require you to fill out an online form, whereas others might need you to fill out an application form and email it to the relevant person.

You’ll be able to find all the details to apply on your local councils website.

Whitehall snubbing offers from local councils to help with Covid vaccinations

Two aspects of this article caught Owl’s eye, the main one is yet another example of councils being sidelined:

“Offers to transform thousands of leisure centres, libraries and civic buildings into vaccination hubs are being rebuffed by Whitehall and NHS chiefs, The Times can disclose.”

And, in the detail, there is this quote from a London council source which Owl reads in the context of Monday’s announcement that  96% of the population is within 10 miles of a vaccine service.

“London leaders say that the promise of a vaccination centre within ten miles of a household was unsuitable in the capital. “Ten miles is a long way across in pandemic-stricken London,” “

If ten miles is a long way in London, what is it like in rural Devon?

Sean O’Neill, Chief Reporter | Neil Johnston www.thetimes.co.uk 

English councils are ready to open buildings, redeploy staff and arrange community minibuses to transport elderly people to receive their jabs. Conservative and Labour council leaders are frustrated that they are being bypassed and say that the vaccine programme is run by “national edict”.

Concerns about the government’s strategy include the emergence of vaccine blindspots such as Spalding, Lincolnshire, where no vaccination centres are yet open and the first injections are expected this weekend. Elderly and vulnerable people have been left to queue in the cold because small centres have no waiting facilities.

Steve Reed, the shadow local government secretary, said last night that it was “mission critical” that ministers used local government expertise to speed up vaccinations. He said: “The government must not repeat the earlier mistakes of overcentralising the response to the pandemic which led to failures on PPE distribution, contact tracing and testing.” Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, will repeat that call today and urge the use of more than 11,000 community pharmacies.

Lord Porter of Spalding, Conservative leader of South Holland council in Lincolnshire, said that he was “massively concerned” at the lack of provision for his largely rural area. “We’ve offered redundant buildings, we’ve got a community hospital they are not using. The answer we get back is ‘No thanks, we don’t need it, we are all sorted.’ ”

The Labour leaders of Waltham Forest and Greenwich boroughs in London have written to Nadhim Zahawi, the vaccine minister, saying that councils are ready to take some of the pressure off the overstretched NHS. Clare Coghill, of Waltham Forest, who offered the use of five leisure centres, said: “I believe a failure to harness our collective strength fully could lead to more unnecessary deaths.”

London leaders say that the promise of a vaccination centre within ten miles of a household was unsuitable in the capital. “Ten miles is a long way across in pandemic-stricken London,” said one council source.

Louise Gittins, Labour leader of Cheshire West and Chester council, said provision in her borough ranged from small GP surgeries, where people queued in the street, to a wedding venue only accessible by car. “This is a top down approach again when it should be bottom up,” she said. “We have good relations with our local NHS but their hands are tied by national edicts.”

A spokesman said the government was “hugely grateful for all offers of support and assistance as we continue to expand the biggest vaccination programme in this country’s history. This is a huge national effort and the NHS is putting into practice the decades of experience it has in delivering large-scale vaccination programmes.”

Great South West Tourism Partnership: Covid – 19 Business Impact Survey

www.sogosurvey.com /survey.aspx

This survey aims to gather further evidence and continue to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on tourism and hospitality businesses across the Great South West area of Cornwall, Devon, Plymouth, Torbay, Somerset and Dorset.  The survey will also help us identify your business priorities for the next 12 months to allow us to support you to recover and grow after the current lockdown.  The results will also be used to continue to lobby the Government for support for our sector.

It should only take a few minutes for you to answer the questions.

The survey has been commissioned by the organisations whose logos are shown above – [see online].

The survey is being undertaken by The South West Research Company.  Your answers will be treated as strictly confidential and will be combined with those from other businesses in your area to provide overall results.  Should you have any problem in completing this survey online please email info@tswrc.co.uk

Does Boris Johnson Now Have Blood On His Hands Over His Covid Christmas Relaxation?

Is Boris Johnson now relying on the vaccine to provide him with the “Dick Barton” gambit:

“With one bound he was free……”? – Owl

Paul Waugh www.huffingtonpost.co.uk extract

“……In evidence to the liaison committee of senior MPs, Boris Johnson admitted there was a “very substantial risk” that the NHS’s intensive care unit capacity nationwide could be “overtopped”. Yes, that was the prime minister himself conceding just how much more dire the situation could get.

That note of fatalism made it sound as though Johnson had done all he could and was now just waiting for the virus pattern to play out. Yet as Keir Starmer suggested in PMQs, the PM had it in his power to get ahead of the Covid curve, rather than merely watch it rise. Starmer was at his forensic best as he laid the most sombre charge at Johnson’s feet: 17,000 people had died since their last PMQs, mainly because the PM delayed for 17 days between being alerted of the new variant and imposing a tough national lockdown.

This, as well as the claim that Johnson could have saved thousands of lives by imposing a lockdown earlier last spring, felt like a preview of the public inquiry to come. If dithering over Covid once could be classed as misfortune, and dithering twice was carelessness, the sheer size of this third wave looks like a sheer recklessness with other people’s lives.

UCL professor of medicine Hugh Montgomery suggested before Christmas that people who failed to obey Covid rules would “have blood on their hands”. But that will be the very charge laid at Johnson’s door if the next few days and weeks provides evidence that the spike in deaths was linked not just to the new variant but to his crucial refusal to “cancel Christmas” for England outside London and the south east.Starmer didn’t quite go that far in PMQs, but he came close, saying we are now seeing “the tragic consequences” of the PM’s delay. It certainly sounded like a central plank in the case for the prosecution, and if nothing else Starmer knows how to prosecute. The Sage minutes of December 22 – when the PM was explicitly warned by scientists that a November-style lockdown simply would not be “sufficient to maintain R below one in the presence of the new variant” – are sure to be Exhibit A……”

Paul Waugh www.huffingtonpost.co.uk extract

“……In evidence to the liaison committee of senior MPs, Boris Johnson admitted there was a “very substantial risk” that the NHS’s intensive care unit capacity nationwide could be “overtopped”. Yes, that was the prime minister himself conceding just how much more dire the situation could get.

That note of fatalism made it sound as though Johnson had done all he could and was now just waiting for the virus pattern to play out. Yet as Keir Starmer suggested in PMQs, the PM had it in his power to get ahead of the Covid curve, rather than merely watch it rise. Starmer was at his forensic best as he laid the most sombre charge at Johnson’s feet: 17,000 people had died since their last PMQs, mainly because the PM delayed for 17 days between being alerted of the new variant and imposing a tough national lockdown.

This, as well as the claim that Johnson could have saved thousands of lives by imposing a lockdown earlier last spring, felt like a preview of the public inquiry to come. If dithering over Covid once could be classed as misfortune, and dithering twice was carelessness, the sheer size of this third wave looks like a sheer recklessness with other people’s lives.

UCL professor of medicine Hugh Montgomery suggested before Christmas that people who failed to obey Covid rules would “have blood on their hands”. But that will be the very charge laid at Johnson’s door if the next few days and weeks provides evidence that the spike in deaths was linked not just to the new variant but to his crucial refusal to “cancel Christmas” for England outside London and the south east.

Starmer didn’t quite go that far in PMQs, but he came close, saying we are now seeing “the tragic consequences” of the PM’s delay. It certainly sounded like a central plank in the case for the prosecution, and if nothing else Starmer knows how to prosecute. The Sage minutes of December 22 – when the PM was explicitly warned by scientists that a November-style lockdown simply would not be “sufficient to maintain R below one in the presence of the new variant” – are sure to be Exhibit A……”

Westcountry’s Covid-19 hospital occupancy

From today’s Western Morning News:

Three of the Westcountry’s five hospital trusts currently have the lowest percentage of beds occupied by Covid-19 patients anywhere in England.Figures from NHS England and the Health Service Journal based on the position as of Monday, January 11, show that the Northern Devon Healthcare Trust, which runs North Devon District Hospital, has the lowest percentage of adult acute beds occupied by Covid-positive patients at just three per cent.

Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust has just five per cent of beds occupied, while University Hospitals Plymouth (Derriford Hospital) had eight per cent of beds occupied – the only three trusts in England where the number was below 10 per cent.

In contrast, at least ten hospital trusts of the 123 in England have half or more of their adult acute beds occupied by Covid-positive patients, with 45 of them having at least a third of their adult general and acute beds occupied by patients with coronavirus.

The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust is currently seeing 17% of its beds occupied, with the Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust at 12%. But Plymouth rose by 6.8% and Cornwall by 6.7% in a week, showing there is no room for complacency.

Meanwhile twelve more people with coronavirus have died at Westcountry hospitals, the latest NHS data shows.

Figures released on Wednesday confirmed that there were three Covid-19 fatalities in North Devon, one at the Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, and one at Derriford Hospital.

Seven more deaths were recorded at the Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust.

In total 600 people have died in hospitals across Devon and Cornwall with coronavirus since the start of the pandemic.

Free meals firm was run by Conservative party donor

The companies at the centre of the outcry over the “disgusting” free meals provided to struggling families while schools remain closed have links to the Conservatives, it has emerged.

www.independent.co.uk

Compass Group and its subsidiary Chartwells are under fire after football star and campaigner Marcus Rashford shared photos of Chartwells’ meagre parcels – saying they were “just not good enough”.

Electoral Commission records show Paul Walsh – chairman of Compass Group until he stepped down last month – has given more than £10,000 to the Tory party.

Mr Walsh, who had been at the helm of Compass since 2014, was a member of No 10’s business advisory group during the early years of David Cameron’s time as prime minister. 

Boris Johnson’s government has promised to urgently investigate the inadequate food parcels sent to parents, which education secretary Gavin Williamson admitted on Wednesday were “absolutely disgusting.” 

However, ministers are facing fresh questions on the contracts awarded to Compass Group and Chartwells to provide the school meals.

The food catering giant and its subsidiary have been awarded almost £350m in school meal catering contracts since 2016, according to analysts at Tussell. The public procurement experts said Compass and Chartwells remain the biggest providers of school meals in the UK.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer asked on Twitter: “Where is the money going? This needs sorting immediately so families don’t go hungry through lockdown.”

Chartwells and other catering contractors have been forced to adapt to the pandemic by providing food at home to families eligible for free school meals.

The packages shared by frustrated parents on Twitter have recently replaced the weekly £15 food vouchers given to low-income parents when lockdown first forced schools to close. Eligible families were given £30 in vouchers over the recent Christmas holidays.

After the latest incident, a Chartwells spokesperson said: “We have had time to investigate the picture circulated on Twitter. For clarity this shows five days of free school lunches (not 10 days) and the charge for food, packing and distribution was actually £10.50 and not £30 as suggested.

“However, in our efforts to provide thousands of food parcels a week at extremely short notice we are very sorry the quantity has fallen short in this instance.”

Children’s minister Vicky Ford said caterers must “urgently” improve the quality of the packages now being provided to low-income families. Ms Ford has said anyone experiencing problems should give details to the Department of Education (DfE) for investigation.

The DfE has also said its national voucher scheme, which offered stand-ins for cash to be used at supermarkets during the first coronavirus lockdown, would resume “shortly”.

The Independent has contacted Compass Group and Chartwells for more information on its school catering contracts with government.

Staying local: will be different in different areas – Kit Malthouse MP

Boris Johnson’s 7 mile cycle ride to the Olympic Park on Sunday has provoked much comment on just what is meant by “staying local”. His ride came after two women were stopped and initially fined for travelling five miles to take a walk (with two takeaway coffees, judged to be a picnic) in Derbyshire. (These charges have since been dropped).

Speaking on BBC Breakfast, policing minister Kit Malthouse MP wanted to clear things up. He insisted people must not “stretch the rules” but went on to say that whether seven miles was local “depends on where you are.”

“Seven miles will be local in different areas;’ he added. [Too true, see below – Owl]

Obvious parallels have been drawn with Dominic Cumming’s trip to Barnard Castle and another example of those in authority stretching the rules made for others to follow.

Not all take this view apparently. Linking to a story about the incident from the Guardian, former Lib Dem leader Vince Cable called the report “unbelievably petty” and went as far as to ask what the publication “had against cycling” . [Owl stripped Vince of his “sainthood” for being the architect of “Local Enterprise Partnerships”, despite the fact that in 2014 he admitted: “I’m not sure we’ve got it right…”]

However, for Marina Hyde it is not far enough:

“It’s much too close. Ideally, I would like him to be one ocean, two deserts and seven miles (of solid lead) away from any seat of power.”

Finally, Owl rehearses the “staying local” argument as it applies to residents of Newton Poppleford.

Readers may recall they have been assigned by the Clinical Commissioning Group to the Ottery St Mary practice. As the crow flies the two are only about 3½ miles apart (but you wouldn’t want to walk the busy narrow lanes, let alone take a child in a pushchair).

There is no direct bus route, patients have to travel into Exeter and out again, a distance of around 23 miles, standard return adult plus child is £23.50, with a round trip time of 2hrs 30 mins plus connection time (pre-Covid,  2019 schedules and prices). There is a surgery in Sidmouth on a direct route with journey time of 5 mins but it is closed to Newton Popp. residents. 

Devon taking the lead on climate change

(John Hart takes a lead – Wow! – Owl)

John Hart www.midweekherald.co.uk

Not many of us will look back on 2020 with any affection. But I want to look forward.

I’m an optimist and, as far as Covid-19 is concerned, we can have some hope with the roll-out of the vaccination programme.

But this week I want to consider another vital subject where I can report on some very positive progress in our county.

Before the pandemic, global warming was dominating the news agenda. And in Devon, work on reducing our carbon emissions has been proceeding apace – despite the coronavirus.

I am very proud that Devon County Council has been taking a lead on the issue.

We declared our intention to be net-zero carbon by 2030 and pledged £250,000 to help establish the Devon Climate Emergency Response Group.

This is made up of the chief officers of more than 25 public, private and voluntary sector organisations in Devon and is tasked with delivering Devon’s Carbon Plan, our roadmap to carbon neutrality.

I am taking this extremely seriously and I have asked the county council’s chief executive, Phil Norrey, to chair the group.

Now in case you are thinking this is just another talking shop, I can assure you it isn’t.

If we are to tackle global warming then all of us need to change our behaviour – personally, in our communities and in the organisations and companies of which we are a part.

And if people are going to change then they need to feel part of the process. So a major consultation’s been launched this month to enable everyone in Devon to have their say on what needs to be done.

Our interim Carbon Plan has been produced by a task force chaired by Professor Patrick Devine-Wright, an environmental social scientist from Exeter University and a lead author for the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The task force held hearings and received nearly 900 suggestions from local people and organisations on the actions we should take.

They’ve based much of the plan on this feedback and now we want your views and your ideas for how we can cut our carbon emissions.

You can read the plan and respond to a consultation questionnaire at the Devon Climate Emergency website on devonclimateemergency.org.uk/governance/devon-climate-emergency-response-group or you can obtain a paper copy from your local library from January 6, by emailing environmentalpolicy@devon.gov.uk or by phone on 0345 155 1015.

Devon’s last major consultation on our libraries drew 20,000 responses and we’re hoping for something similar or even more this time.

Climate change affects us all and if we feel committed to the actions needed to combat it and have made our contribution to defining them, then we’re more likely to make the effort and, potentially, to take the pain.

Already progress is being made. The county council’s own carbon footprint has fallen by almost half in the last eight years.

Within two years our streetlights will all be LED, cutting carbon emissions by three-quarters. That’s 15,000 tonnes of carbon a year – equivalent to taking 8,000 cars off the road.

We will further reduce emissions by improving the energy efficiency of county council buildings.

We’ve installed solar panels at County Hall and we’ll repeat that on other buildings and we’ll buy renewable energy direct from new solar power projects in Devon.

We’re planning to make at least half of our vehicle fleet electric in the next few years and we’re working to ensure our supply chain is carbon neutral by 2030.

None of that is enough but, with your help, we can inspire individuals, communities, companies and organisations across Devon to do even more.

Hospital patients to be sent to hotels to free up beds for critical Covid patients

Looks like Plan B (already adopted in Derriford) – Owl

Thousands of hospital patients are to be discharged early to hotels or their own homes to free up beds for Covid-19 sufferers needing life-or-death care, the Guardian has learned.

Denis Campbell www.theguardian.com 

Hospital chiefs in England intend to start discharging patients early on a scale never seen before, as an emergency measure to create “extra emergency contingency capacity” and stop parts of the NHS collapsing, senior sources said.

Documents seen by the Guardian also revealed that the NHS is asking care homes to start accepting Covid patients directly from hospitals and without a recent negative test, as long as they have been in isolation for 14 days and have shown no new symptoms.

Under the “home and hotel” plan, patients discharged early into a hotel will receive help from voluntary organisations such as St John Ambulance and the British Red Cross, armed forces medical personnel and any available NHS staff.

The London Hotel Group (LHG) has started taking Covid-positive patients who are homeless from King’s College hospital in south London and is looking after them in its Best Western-branded hotel in nearby Croydon. It is in talks with 20 other NHS trusts and says it could provide 5,000 beds.

Families will be expected to play a key role in monitoring and caring for loved ones who are sent home days or weeks before they would otherwise have left hospital, with support from health professionals where possible.

The plans come amid growing concern that hospitals will soon be overwhelmed and that the crisis may not peak for several weeks. More than 35,000 Covid patients are in UK hospitals, with that number rising by 6,213 in the last week alone.

NHS leaders fear that the new Covid variant, which has driven up infection rates in London and south-east and east England, is leaving many hospitals struggling to cope, and will soon do the same in the south-west and north-west.

Record levels of sickness absence in the health service and its central role in the government’s mass vaccination drive led NHS sources to warn that few staff will have time to deliver significant care at private homes or hotels once patients are discharged.

But they said patients will not be asked to leave hospital early if they are still medically at risk, so they should need mainly light-touch care. “This is for patients who don’t need to be in a hospital bed but still need to be in a protected environment,” said one official.

NHS England, as well as bosses of hospitals under the most extreme pressure, are having detailed discussions about implementing the “home and hotel” option for what a senior NHS source said would involve “thousands” of patients. It is part of their efforts to create “extra emergency contingency capacity” once other options, such as doubling or tripling critical care capacity and using the emergency Nightingale field hospitals, have been exhausted, sources said.

LHG said its hotels could provide beds for at least 5,000 patients facing early discharge, including 1,500 in London. LHG’s chief executive, Meher Nawab, said: “We will be looking to roll this solution out across our hotels to provide hospitals with a lifeline at this critical time.”

An LHG spokesperson added: “The patient group the NHS is seeking to accommodate at this stage are recovered or recovering from Covid and who are medically fit for discharge, and thus do not require specialist medical supervision or specialist care, but can’t yet return home. This frees up NHS bedspace and capacity and is relatively easy for hotels to accommodate.”

But the plan has generated controversy, with patient groups voicing unease about its impact. Lucy Watson, chair of the Patients Association, said: “This is a dire situation, in which the NHS often has no good options available. Discharging patients early from hospital is likely to be one of few options open to the NHS to manage the scale of the current need.

“However, early discharge can often cause problems that result in harm to the patient and the need to re-admit them. Care by volunteers in hotels is not an adequate substitute for proper hospital care. But at a time when hospitals are overwhelmed by critically ill patients and striving to prevent loss of life on a large scale, clearly they will be making desperate choices.”

Dr Charlotte Augst, chief executive of the umbrella group of health charities National Voices, said: “We have questions about where the health and care staff to look after those people will come from and how any deterioration would be dealt with given the very long waits for 111 or 999 services.

“In our view this proposal is indicative of the unpalatable decisions NHS leaders are now forced to make due to the immense pressures placed on the system by this latest lockdown coming yet again too late to protect the NHS’s ability to provide universal high quality services for all.”

Jeremy Hunt, the former health secretary who now chairs the Commons health select committee, warned on Tuesday that the NHS is facing a “triple whammy” of pressures that could leave it dangerously exposed this winter and mean the greatest pressure may not arrive until February.

Chris Hopson, chief executive of NHS Providers, said that trusts would expand capacity but “will also work closely with community services and social care partners to maximise the discharge of medically fit patients”.

Meanwhile, the NHS is asking care homes to start accepting Covid patients directly from hospitals and without a recent Covid test, the Guardian has learned.

The policy had been to send Covid patients to designated “hot” care homes where infection spread could be limited and to prevent a repeat of last spring’s epidemic in care homes, which was partly fuelled by hospital discharges. But a target to set up 500 such homes has been missed, leaving only 2,533 beds available.

An NHS document sent to some care providers says: “We are now advising that for some within this group, it will be appropriate for them to move directly to a care home from hospital … because we now know they do not pose an infection risk to other residents in a care home.”

If clinicians assess a patient has no new Covid symptoms or exposure and has completed their isolation period, they can be discharged straight to a care home without a further Covid test in the 48 hours before discharge, it adds.

The plan sparked concern among care operators who want assurances that anyone coming out of hospital 14 days after a positive test cannot still pass the virus on.

“We have said we need to see strong clinical evidence,” said Nadra Ahmed, executive chairman of the National Care Association, which represents independent care operators. “We need to have absolute confidence if someone is coming out of hospital having been Covid-positive that they are no longer infectious.”

Prof Martin Green, chief executive of Care England, which represents private care providers, said: “The key is, it is for the care homes to decide and hospitals should not put undue pressure on care homes.”

The Department of Health and Social Care has been approached for comment.

‘What am I supposed to make with this!’ Parents on schools’ meagre food parcels

Another example of how the private sector delivers a public service – Owl

The government and the catering companies it has hired have come under fire after photographs of free school meal parcels were circulated online.

Molly Blackall www.theguardian.com 

The food packages sent to children who qualify for free school meals and are remote learning because of the national lockdown were not considered to contain enough high quality food. The Department for Education said it was looking into the issue, and that “parcels should be nutritious and contain a varied range of food”.

Four families who are eligible for food parcels shared their response.

‘It makes things so difficult’

Mother of three, Karen Phillips, 33, has been forced to spend her rent money on her children’s lunches after receiving a “disgraceful” food parcel from her school last week.

The parcel, intended to last her 12-year-old daughter all week, didn’t contain any carbohydrates except two potatoes, alongside one onion, two peppers, a satsuma, single tomato and carrot, and two eggs wrapped in cling film. The parcel also included one small tub of soup powder, the same sized tub of tuna mayo, and a small bag of grated cheese.

The food parcel given to Karen Phillips last Tuesday.

The food parcel given to Karen Phillips last Tuesday. Photograph: Karen Phillips/Guardian Community

“I phoned the school straight away and said, ‘what am I supposed to make with this?’ They said they had complained to their suppliers, and were going to start doing food vouchers instead, but they haven’t told us when they’ll be getting them. There were no instructions about what I could make with the food, and the school had no idea,” said Phillips, who lives in Berkshire as a full-time parent.

“I’d like to know how the catering company are getting away with it,” she added.

Her two children at primary school have not yet been offered anything.

“I told the teacher that I was going to use my rent money to pay for her daughters’ school dinners but the teacher said she couldn’t help,” she said. “It makes things so difficult. With homeschooling children as well, you don’t need the added stress of wondering if you can feed your kids.”

‘Where does the money go if this is what they’re giving people?’

The food parcel given to Sarah yesterday, including two packs of bagels with best before labels of 3 April 2020 and 31 August 2020.

The food parcel given to Sarah included two packs of bagels with best before labels of 3 April 2020 and 31 August 2020. Photograph: Sarah/Guardian Community

Sarah, a 36-year-old single mother in Birmingham, said she thought her parcel was “a bit of an insult” when it was delivered from her daughter’s secondary school this week. The package didn’t contain any fresh food except two potatoes. It also included bagels which, while they were frozen, were nine months out of date.

With the parcels supposedly costing £15 (for one child) from the government, Sarah said she could not understand where the extra money had gone.

“I know it’s free, and it does help, but they’re getting government funding to do this,” she said. “Where does the money go if this is what they’re giving people? It’s a bit disappointing.”

‘It’s totally shocking’

For her three children in high school, Caroline McMullen, 42, received “a small loaf of bread, apple juice, one apple each, a bag with a handful of pasta each, three small bags of raisins, cheese slices, a tub of butter and three tins of beans”, which was supposed to last for 10 days. Other than three apples, there wasn’t any fresh fruit or vegetables included.

“I’ve seen parents giving negative reviews of their parcels on Twitter, but I think, at least you’ve got a tomato. I didn’t get a single one,” said McMullen, who lives in Blackpool.

“Because of Covid, I’m trying to force as much fruit and veg down the kids’ mouths as possible, to keep their immune systems up. To give them pasta and raisins, it’s disgusting.”

McMullen said the food would not go far enough to keep her children fed for the 10-day period.

“It’s totally shocking,” she said. “I have a 14-year-old lad that eats me out of house and home. How do I tell him he’s only got an apple? It’s not even a bag of pasta, it’s a handful in a bag.”

She is also concerned that the school is not able to deliver the parcels. After the school confirmed another case of coronavirus on Tuesday morning, she said she was worried about having to travel into the school to collect food.

“What’s the point in keeping the kids off school if I have to go in? I feel like I have to choose between letting them starve or risk getting infection,” she said.

‘When you’re given food you can’t eat, it’s a waste’

Other parents were concerned that the limited supplies and lack of choice in the parcels would mean that children with dietary requirements could not benefit.

In Reading, one of Sharon’s* three children has Prader-Willi syndrome, a medical condition that means his diet is heavily restricted.

“It’s totally pointless me accepting the food parcel of potatoes and Soreen snacks, pasta and beans, when he is unable to eat any of it due to his dietary requirements,” she said.

Sharon is yet to receive her parcel but has emailed her son’s school to see if they can adapt it for her son’s needs. For families like hers, Sharon said, the voucher system was much more effective, as well as being better value for money.

“At least with the voucher I am able to buy food he is actually allowed to eat,” she said. “When you’re given food you can’t eat, it’s a waste. It should be more of a blanket policy. The vouchers are much easier, they allow you to utilise the scheme for your family.”

* Name has been changed

And from Roadside Mum BBC news

A food parcel received by Twitter user Roadside Mumimage: Roadside Mum

“Public funds were charged £30. I’d have bought this for £5.22,” said Twitter user Roadside Mum of the parcel she received

EU-funded estuary flooding begins in Spring

Work on a landscape-scale project to address the impact of climate change by returning a Devon estuary and flood plain to a more natural condition is set to begin in the Spring.

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.com

East Devon District Council’s planning committee last Wednesday approved a pioneering project to help a river valley on England’s Jurassic Coast adapt to climate change and create an internationally important wildlife reserve.

The EU-funded Lower Otter Restoration Project (LORP) will reconnect the River Otter to its historic floodplain and return the lower Otter Valley to a more natural condition; creating more than 50 hecatres of intertidal mudflats, saltmarsh and other valuable estuarine habitats.

The success of the £15 million project rested on it being given the thumbs up by East Devon District Council, and planning approval means work on the project can start this spring and be completed by early 2023.

The Otter Estuary

The Otter Estuary (Image: REKORD Media)

Although much loved, the Lower Otter Valley has been heavily modified by human hand in the last 200 years with the construction of an embankment, a road, a rubbish tip, an aqueduct and an old railway line.

These structures are difficult and expensive to maintain and restrict natural processes including the movement of water and reduces habitat quality and diversity, and since the creation of an embankment in the early 19th Century, the River Otter has been disconnected from much of its natural flood plain.

The creation of new habitats and restoration of the site will be achieved by breaching the embankment. This will allow a much greater extent of the original floodplain to flood at high tide and drain at low tide producing important intertidal habitat, mudflats and saltmarsh for wading birds. There will also be areas of reedbed and grazing marsh.

Once established, the new site will become a wildlife reserve of international importance within five years, fulfilling the aspirations of all partners involved.

The Lower Otter valley is the subject of plans from the Environment Agency

The Lower Otter valley is the subject of plans from the Environment Agency

The LORP is a partnership between the Environment Agency, local landowner Clinton Devon Estates, and the East Devon Pebblebed Heaths Conservation Trust that currently manages the estuary. It also has the support of Natural England, RSPB and Devon Wildlife Trust.

Mark Rice, Environment Manager for the Environment Agency, said: “Climate change is affecting the way we manage our coasts and estuaries and we must adapt to that change.

“The Lower Otter Restoration Project is an example of how we can do that. We aim to deliver long term benefits for people and wildlife by working in partnership and through more sustainable management of the Otter Estuary.”

Dr Sam Bridgewater, head of wildlife and conservation at Clinton Devon Estates, said: “The Estate is proud to be associated with this project. Coastal communities must adapt as sea levels rise and storm events become more frequent.

“It is our belief the Lower Otter Restoration Project will provide a more sustainable and certain future for the threatened Otter valley. It will also deliver very significant benefits to people and wildlife.

“The granting of planning approval is a major step forward in helping us deliver this vision.

“We have worked very closely with a wide range of stakeholders who have helped us reach this milestone and we are grateful for their input over the years.”

Cllr Geoff Jung, East Devon’s cabinet member for coast, country and environment, said: “I am delighted that East Devon’s planning committee unanimously voted to allow the Lower Otter Restoration Project to go ahead.

“This council is totally committed to issues related to climate change, from purchasing electric vehicles, a national leader in recycling and waste, and working with partners and landowners to manage our valuable natural coast and countryside from the dangers of our changing climate and sea level-rises.

“We recognise that there will be some disruption, whilst the work is being carried out, but the alternative risk of allowing the embankments to fail was too greater a risk. The proposal will return the Lower Otter to a more natural sustainable state, which will provide extra wildlife habitat that is being lost both here in East Devon and elsewhere.

“We would like to thank the team at Clinton Devon Estates and the Environment Agency for their shared commitment to this exciting and pioneering project.”

The Lower Otter Estuary in Budleigh Salterton.

The Lower Otter Estuary in Budleigh Salterton. (Image: PACCo)

Budleigh and Raleigh ward members Cllr Alan Dent, Cllr Paul Jarvis and Cllr Tom Wright added: “We are all very pleased planning permission for this application has been granted. Not only will it have very important environmental gains but it will also secure the future of Budleigh Salterton Cricket Club and access along South Farm Road which is vital for those South Farm businesses.”

When the application went before councillors last week, they were told it would see the Big and Little Marsh floodplains around Budleigh Salterton restored, with breaches created in the Little Bank, the Big Bank and the River Otter Embankment to allow water to flow through.

The aim is to avoid the significant risk that a major flood or extreme tidal event could lead to catastrophic failure of the existing embankments, with unpredictable environmental and social impacts, given that in recent years, part of the South West Coast Path that runs along the embankments have been closed to the public for significant periods due to erosion caused by such events.

The committee heard that if nothing was done, then changes to the environment would likely occur, but would be unmanaged and unpredictable, and backed the officer recommendation to approve the scheme.

As part of the plans to restore the historic floodplain of the River Otter, breaches in existing embankments would be created to allow water from both the River Otter and the Estuary to inundate the site, creating intertidal saltmarsh and mudflats.

In addition, South Farm Road will be realigned and raised at a point just to the south of the existing road, and a small car park created at its western end and a new road bridge will be required, and a new footbridge to the South. Existing footpaths will be realigned and the landfill site capped and planted with grassland and woodland.

The spit to the south will be allowed to evolve naturally, necessitating the removal of the southern part of the loop path known as Donkeys Turn.

The cricket club will be moved from its current location to land off of East Budleigh Road, permission for which has already been granted under a separate planning application. Floods have left part of their current Ottermouth home under water on three occasions in the last 10 years, with a plan to relocate to Janie’s Field on the outskirts of the town having been agreed.