Local Councillor, Dr Cathy Gardner, seeks to bring Judicial Review of Care Home Policy

Post amended to include link to crowd funding 11:40

In order to launch a legal challenge against the Government Cathy will need to raise funds. A crowd funding page has been set up on Crowd Justice. 

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/care-home-deaths/

The Government faces the prospect of a judicial review over their care home policy which saw patients with coronavirus removed from hospitals.

Lawyers under instruction from Dr Cathy Gardner have written to Matt Hancock and heads of the NHS as they seek to bring a judicial review over the policy.

Government faces prospect of judicial review into policy to move Covid-19 patients to care homes

By Mason Boycott-Owen and Izzy Lyons www.telegraph.co.uk

Dr Gardner is pursuing the action following the death of her father in a care home in April. She claims that both the Government and the NHS were in breach of four separate articles of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In a legal letter to Matt Hancock, the lawyers say that Dr Gardner will argue that the policies of the Health Secretary, NHS England and Public Health England “manifestly failed to protect the health, well-being and right to life of those residing and working in care homes.”

“Their failings have led to large numbers of unnecessary deaths and serious illnesses,” the letter continued.

“In addition, the failings of Government have been aggravated by the making of wholly disingenuous, misleading and – in some cases – plainly false statements suggesting that everything necessary has been done to protect care homes during the pandemic.”

On 19 March and 2 April the Government told NHS hospitals to transfer any patients who no longer required hospital level treatment, and set out how care homes should accept patients who either have Covid-19, or weren’t even tested.

Analysis by the Telegraph at the time suggested that the rate of coronavirus deaths accelerated more than twice as fast in care homes than in hospitals from 7 April, just over two weeks since the first document was published.

The Government’s decision was branded “unfathomable” by care providers such as Hometouch, saying it showed a “lack of foresight” by officials.

Dr Gardner’s father, Michael Gibson was a resident who died at a care home in Bicester, Oxfordshire, in April this year of suspected Covid-19.

The letter claims that prior to her father’s death, the care home was “pressured” to accept the transfer of a patient who had been admitted to hospital, tested positive for Covid-19 but discharged back to the care home as she had not had a high temperature for 72 hours.

Dr Gardner, who is fundraising her legal fees for the case, said: “I am appalled that Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State, can give the impression that the Government has sought to cast a protective ring over elderly residents of care homes – and right from the start.

“The truth is that there has been at best a casual approach to protecting the residents of care homes; at worst the Government have adopted a policy that has caused the death of the most vulnerable in our society.

“It is completely unacceptable that this happened and that responsibility has been avoided. I have therefore instructed my lawyers to threaten legal proceedings against the Government for the harm that has been suffered by my father. “

Paul Conrathe, Human Rights Solicitor with Sinclairslaw said: “The State is under a duty to protect its citizens from harm. It is also under a duty to act fairly and not discriminate against the elderly and those with disabilities. 

“The actions of the Secretary of State, NHS England and Public Health England in putting residents of care homes and care workers at risk of COVID-19 infection seriously violated the human rights of the most vulnerable in our society. I have therefore written to them requesting that they accept responsibility for their unlawful decisions and policies. If they fail to do so then my client will initiate proceedings in the High Court for a judicial review.”

The Department for Health and Social Care did not provide a comment.

U.K. has more coronavirus deaths in one day than all EU countries combined

The United Kingdom on Wednesday reported that 359 additional people have died after contracting COVID-19. The daily number is higher than the combined total of COVID-19 deaths that the 27 countries in the European Union reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) for its June 3 situation report on the pandemic.

By Meghan Roos www.newsweek.com 
Announcing the U.K.’s latest numbers during a news conference Wednesday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the country was taking steps to keep transmission rates on the decline in the hope of preventing a second wave.

“We need to take steps to manage the flare-ups and stop the virus from re-emerging,” Johnson said.

Of the more than 382,000 people who have died of COVID-19 around the world, 39,728 have been U.K. residents, the Department of Health and Social Care reported Wednesday. The U.K. is second behind the U.S. on the list of countries that have reported the greatest number of COVID-19 deaths since the pandemic began.

In the EU, Italy, France, Spain, Belgium and Germany also rank among the top 10 countries in terms of COVID-19 deaths, according to a Johns Hopkins University tracker. Of the EU countries that sent updated case numbers to the WHO for its June 3 report, France had the highest number of new deaths, with 107 reported by Wednesday morning.

Though the data in the WHO’s report appears to show a stark difference between the number of new deaths U.K. health officials reported Wednesday and the 332 COVID-19 deaths reported by the EU’s 27 countries, the organization warned in the report that the data was not complete and that all countries were operating on different virus-reporting timelines. For the U.K., the number of deaths included in the WHO’s report were from Tuesday, when health officials reported 324 new deaths.

“Differences are to be expected between information products published by WHO, national public health authorities, and other sources using different inclusion criteria and different data cut-off times,” the WHO’s report said. “While steps are taken to ensure accuracy and reliability, all data are subject to continuous verification and change.”

The WHO did not respond to Newsweek’s request for comment before publication.

While the threat from the virus remains high in the U.K., the country has in recent weeks taken steps to lift restrictions imposed during the spring. In mid-May, Johnson outlined his plan to restart the country’s economy, with schools, shops and nurseries first on the reopening docket. Despite the moves to reopen, Johnson and other politicians voiced concern Wednesday over the virus’s likelihood of returning, as other nations similarly began taking steps to reopen.

During an address to the House of Commons Wednesday, U.K. Secretary of State for the Home Department Priti Patel said the country would require individuals traveling into the country to self-isolate for two weeks before engaging with residents.

“We are past the peak, but we are now more vulnerable to infections being brought in from abroad,” Patel said.

Most European countries still have tight restrictions in place to prevent travelers from bringing the virus into their communities, but Italy on Wednesday took a step none of the others have by becoming the first to reopen its borders to international travel.

One in three would rather not go back to the office after lockdown

More than a third of Britons would prefer to work from home for most of the week once the pandemic is over, a survey of changing social attitudes has found.

Behaviour is shifting in ways that could have considerable implications for different industries and the wider economy, the study suggests.

Philip Aldrick, Economics Editor www.thetimes.co.uk 
The lockdown has caused a spike in online gaming, DIY and indoor hobbies, trends that are likely to persist, the survey of 1,500 people by Jefferies, the investment bank, found.

Respondents were wary about mingling in restaurants, pubs and cinemas, which suggests those sectors will continue to struggle even as social restrictions are eased.

Sixty per cent of respondents said they would to return to work immediately if allowed, but 35 per cent would prefer to work from home three to four days a week.

However, Jefferies said the longer-term shift to home working implied by the results was “smaller than we might have expected”.

Restaurants and pubs may struggle because 21 per cent of people said they would not visit such venues even if social-distancing measures were in place. “This points to a slow pace of recovery in the on-trade in the new normal world,” Jefferies analysts said.

Half of respondents planned to dine out less than they did before lockdown. Two-metre social distancing and a vaccine were cited as the main requirements for people to return to restaurants and pubs. Cinemas, theatres and betting shops were also no-go areas for more than half of respondents.

While going overseas was the top priority for discretionary spending once the pandemic is over, with 23 per cent of respondents looking forward to a trip, 41 per cent planned to take fewer holidays. Many were also concerned about staying in hotels, with 75 per cent saying they would wait until at least three months after the lockdown is over.

The winners from these changing social attitudes have been the gaming companies. Not only have people spent more time playing video games, they have increased their in-game purchases. More than half of men, the under-55s, students and the full-time employed reported playing more video games and spending more on them.

Of those who have been doing up their homes, 37 per cent said they planned to continue with DIY after restrictions ease. Just over half of respondents said they had fixed up their home since lockdown began on March 23.

Controversial Honiton restaurant given green light

Plans to turn a vacant shop in Honiton into a restaurant have been given the go-ahead following an appeal upheld by the UK’s Planning Inspectorate.

Hannah Corfield honiton.nub.news

The premises at number 20 New Street, formerly Sparks shoe repairs, was bought by the owners of what was previously the Istanbul Turkish Restaurant opposite.

Plans to repurpose the building for restaurant use were refused by the planning committee at East Devon District Council in July of last year – citing that the proposed development would ‘likely result in harm to the amenity of neighbouring residents’.

Applicant, Mrs Hatice Oflaz, appealed the decision which was officially overruled in an announcement made last Friday (29 May).

The Planning Inspectorate stated: “I have found that there is no conflict with the development plan.

“None of the other matters raised before me, or any other material considerations indicate that a decision should be taken otherwise than in accordance with the development plan.

“The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for creation of separate ground floor restaurant unit and separate first and second floor residential unit from shop and living unit.”

Upon hearing news of the appeal decision; neighbouring business owner, Ian Priestley, has made clear that he is ‘unhappy’ with the overruling having objected to the original proposal.

His concerns remain ‘the effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular regard to noise, disturbance and privacy’.

Speaking on behalf of Honiton Chamber of Commerce, Paul Fudge said: “Honiton has had some challenging times during the last few weeks and we at The Chamber are looking forward to welcoming all our shoppers and visitors back as soon as possible.

“Honiton has a diverse community and to have shops, restaurants and cafés that reflect this and any new business that comes to Honiton, or one that is expanding, can only be seen as a positive move towards keeping Honiton on the map, as a thriving market town that caters for all.”

 

Warning East Devon open spaces could be shut over rubbish behaviour

Open spaces in East Devon could be shut to tackle bad behaviour, groups ignoring social distancing rules and litter-louts, the district council has warned.

 East Devon Reporter eastdevonnews.co.uk
Manor Gardens in Exmouth had to be closed at the weekend after boozy beachgoers – moved on from the seafront by police – headed to the park.
Large amounts of rubbish being left at beauty spots has also prompted a flurry of complaints.

East Devon District Council (EDDC) says its beaches, parks and public spaces are ‘busier than ever’ after lockdown restrictions were eased.

The authority has in turn seen ‘exceptional levels of demand’ on services such as street cleaning, litter bin collections and toilets.

It has asked residents and visitors to help keep areas tidy and stick to the two-metre social distancing rule.

An EDDC spokesperson said: “We have received many reports of rubbish being left on our beaches and in our parks and gardens and we would appeal to visitors to collect their litter as they leave these areas, take it home and recycle it.

“We want everyone to be able to enjoy these beautiful places and not have them blighted by a minority of people who leave their litter behind.

“With no lifeguards on Exmouth beach currently, signage is being displayed to remind visitors to stay safe around the water.

“However, large groups are congregating on beaches across the district, ignoring social distancing restrictions and government guidelines of no more than six people gathering at one time.

“The council is working with the police to educate and advise these groups on how their actions are impacting on others.

“At the weekend, the council had to close Manor Gardens in Exmouth at the request of the police as there were concerns about the antisocial behaviour of people drinking on the beach, being moved on by the police, and settling in the gardens instead.

“The council will continue to work with the police and consider closing open spaces if people are not behaving responsibly.”

Councillor Geoff Jung, portfolio holder for coast, country and environment, said: “We’re finding that levels of demand on our services are equal to the busiest of summer holiday days.

“Currently our staff is reduced by 20 per cent due to coronavirus and our budgets have been severely impacted by the pandemic.”

Exmouth Town ward member Cllr Olly Davey added: “We welcome visitors to our wonderful beach, but ask you to remember that we are still required to comply with government measures to keep everyone safe.

“Please act responsibly and leave our town as you would hope to find it, taking your litter home if need be.”

Dominic Cummings lockdown cottage ‘built without planning permission’

Planning bosses are investigating whether the property Dominic Cummings stayed in during his controversial lockdown trip was built without planning permission.

Aerial photo on bbc link  here

Kali Lindsay www.mirror.co.uk 

The governmental advisor stayed at North Lodge, near Durham, when he travelled to the area on March 27 with his four-year-old son and wife after she started suffering coronavirus symptoms.

The building is understood to have been the site of a swimming pool and permission for the erection of a pitched roof structure over it was granted in 2001.

No other applications have made for it since, apart from the felling of trees.

Mr Cummings told a news conference last week that the building was “an isolated cottage” roughly 50 metres from his parents’ home, and described it as “sort of concrete blocks”.

According to reports, his parents bought the farm in 1999.

Durham County Council has now received several complaints over whether the property has the necessary planning permission to be used as a residential dwelling.

A spokeswoman for Durham County Council said: “We have received a number of complaints and are currently looking into the matter.”

The Prime Minister’s chief adviser was slammed for his decision to travel 260 miles from his home and accused of breaking lockdown restrictions.

Mr Cummings said he acted “lawfully and reasonably” after coming under fire for the trip.

He said the reason for returning to the North East was because his wife had developed coronavirus symptoms and they had issues with childcare if they both became unwell.

He admitted making a 60-mile round trip to Barnard Castle during his stay claiming he needed to check his eyesight after experiencing coronavirus symptoms.

Durham Constabulary has said it doesn’t consider Mr Cummings locating to Durham an offence but said the trip to Barnard Castle may have been a “minor breach” of the lockdown rules.

A spokeswoman for Downing Street declined to comment on the matter.

Coastal council bosses vent disgust at beaches left covered in litter and faeces after lockdown heatwave

On Monday 11 May, Boris Johnson suddenly announced that people in England could travel any distance to their chosen beauty spot, though they may not stay overnight. He did this without consulting Local Authorities, National Parks or Police.

Why he did this is not clear. It set Councils such as EDDC scrambling to try to respond to the sudden invasion of people streaming down the M5 with no toilet facilities open at any of the beauty spots.

We in the South West have the lowest infection levels in the country, but this precipitate action will have exposed us to the mass movement of people from more highly infected regions, especially the Midlands. The consequences of this are, as yet, unknown.

EDDC announced on 15 May that, subject to a risk assessment, they would attempt to re-open a limited number of toilets by 22 May, coincidentally the day the Guardian and Mirror broke the Dominic Cummings story. These toilets have to be supplied with hand sanitiser and members of Street Scene have to deep clean them three times a day.

The Dominic Cummings’ “No regrets, no apology” press statement in the No 10 Rose garden took place on 25 May. On 28 May, many believe to distract attention, Boris Johnson announced further easing of the lockdown restrictions.

This article describes the consequences.

Owl also draws attention to the clean up cost which has to be bourne by small communities with no compensating revenues being spent locally. This looks like a very political decision taken in London by a Prime Minister with no knowledge or feeling for rural communities.

Owl has received reports of toilet paper strewn along many of the East Devon footpaths close to beaches.

Andy Wells Freelance Writer uk.news.yahoo.com

Beaches in Devon were left covered in litter and human waste after a weekend that saw sun worshippers flock to the coast as lockdown measures began to ease.

As temperatures soared in a mini heatwave, thousands flocked to the beaches to enjoy time outside their homes.

Afterwards, council staff were left stunned when they collected enough litter to fill 500 wheelie bins.

Workers discovered glass bottles, disposable barbecue trays, and even human faeces on a plastic picnic blanket at a beach in Teignbridge.

Teignbridge District Council tweeted: “Our staff (and residents) collected 500 wheelie bins worth of discarded litter from beaches and open spaces after the weekend, including glass bottles, cans & bbq trays.

“Please respect our communities and take your rubbish home with you.”

The council’s recycling chief, Alistair Dewhirst, told Devon Live: “Our staff have been working flat-out throughout the half-term week and this weekend to keep on top of the vast amounts of rubbish generated by visitors to our beaches and open spaces.

“This is on top of the additional pressures and risks they face daily in carrying out their work throughout the COVID-19 pandemic…

“It is completely unacceptable for people to leave their rubbish on the beaches for others to clear up.”

Cllr Andrew McGregor, executive member for leisure services and open spaces, added: ““It’s really important that now, more than ever, we protect our local communities from the threat of coronavirus, and across Devon we’re asking people to continue to follow the social distancing guidelines, when out and about in public.

“But we’re also asking people to take their litter home with them, to follow the safety guidance on beaches and in the sea, and to respect local communities by keeping noise down and behaving responsibly.”

Pictures shared on social media show litter collected from beaches in other areas from over the weekend – including in Brighton, Galway and Sefton.

Crowds on beaches and cliffs at Durdle Door in Dorset also showed a “shocking” disregard for the area, a conservation charity has said.

The Jurassic Coast Trust described the “shocking events” of three people suffering serious injuries at the beauty spot after leaping from the top of the limestone arch, which is 200ft high.

Thousands of people were evacuated from the beach and surrounding cliff area to allow air ambulances to land.

Lucy Culkin, chief executive of the charity, said it had received hundreds of messages from members of the public since the weekend.

She said these highlighted the “appalling volume of litter” on beaches, including human waste, sanitary items and surgical masks and gloves, as well as disposable barbecues.

“The lack of respect for our coastline shown by some has deeply saddened our local communities and visitors alike,” she said.

“It was clear to see that some had all but forgotten the guidelines of social distancing or welfare for themselves and others, or indeed any respect for the natural environment they were visiting.”

James Weld, the owner of the Lulworth Estate on which Durdle Door is situated, said the easing of lockdown restrictions to allow for unlimited travel in England had resulted in an “unacceptable influx of visitors”.

More than 100 colourful scrubs made for East Devon care homes

See online article for photo

A scheme initiated by East Budleigh with Bicton Parish Council has seen more than 100 scrubs made for care homes in the surrounding area.

 

After parish council clerk Judith Venning learned that some volunteers were making scrubs for the NHS, she decided to help care homes which are also fighting the spread of Covid-19.

A successful application to East Devon District Council’s prompt action fund paid for the materials.

More than 100 colourful sets of scrubs were made for care homes in Otterton, Budleigh Salterton and Exmouth by a group of ladies including Judith.

Aimee Harris, deputy manager of The Firs Care Home, in Budleigh said: “They are so very much appreciated and the staff feel so comfortable in them and much cooler in this hotter weather.

“The residents absolutely love them too – they have all been commenting how nice all the bright colours are.”

Virus in the air now Bacteria in our river water

Recent blooms of blue-green algae in local rivers, which is often fatal to dogs, have prompted a warning to dog owners from a local veterinary practice.

Joseph Bulmer sidmouth.nub.news 
Keep dogs out of local rivers – blue green algae warning from Otter Vets

Otter Vets, which has practices in Sidmouth and Ottery St Mary, has warned dog walkers to keep their dogs from entering the River Otter due to harmful toxins released by blue-green algae.

At times of drought bacteria in local waterways multiply causing the bacteria to clump, giving the appearance of algae.

These blooms of blue-green algae create toxins which can damage a dog’s liver, preventing it from functioning properly.

A spokesperson for Otter Vets said: “It can be very difficult to tell where blue-green algae is blooming. Therefore advice is to keep dogs out of the water!

“Sadly, exposure to toxic blue-green algae is often fatal, and can also cause long term health problems in dogs that survive after drinking or swimming in algae-contaminated water. Some types of blue-green algae can kill a dog just 15 minutes to an hour after drinking contaminated water.

“Dogs who have been swimming in water can get the algae caught in their fur, and can ingest it while cleaning themselves later on. Cats are also at risk.”

The bacteria can also cause rashes, sickness, stomach pains, fever and headaches in humans.

Children are reportedly at greater risk than adults. The advice to humans and pets is stay out of the water at this time.

Symptoms of blue-green algae exposure

-Vomiting
-Diarrhoea
-Seizures/fitting
-Weakness/collapse/unconsciousness
-Disorientation
-Drooling
-Breathing difficulties

Dorset (might this be East Devon & Dorset one day?) National Park Summer Newsletter

The Old (backward-looking) Guard in East Devon has always viewed the idea of a National Park, created by combining the adjacent AONBs in both counties, as a threat rather than as an opportunity.

A threat because it might cramp their style in the weights they attached to the economic benefits of development against those given to protecting and enhancing the landscape. (The level of protection offered by an AONB  should be the same as a National Park  but EDDC in their planning decisions hasn’t interpreted it that way in the past).

Local Planning Authorities (LPA) have enormous freedom to make these subjective  judgements. If you don’t like the  way your LPA interprets the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) your remedy is not generally through the courts, which deal with procedural concerns, but through the ballot box.

Last May, using the ballot box was what the people of East Devon finally did. They threw out the Old Guard.

Readers might remember that the government is seriously considering following the Glover Landscape Review recommendation to create a new National Park combining the East Devon and Dorset AONB’s.

Last October the Ingham regime showed their lack of enthusiasm for breaking from the Tory past when the cabinet decided to do nothing to seize the initiative:

“Resolve to await the Governments response to the recommendations; and note that the Chilterns, the Cotswolds and the Dorset and East Devon AONBs are potential candidates for future designation as National Parks.”

This Newsletter spells out some of the OPPORTUNITIES  and reviews the success the South Downs National Park has achieved in its first ten years.

A National Park proposal would tick a lot of environmental and health and well being boxes as well as potentially unlocking additional resources.

Owl hopes that at the very least East Devon now starts talking to the  “Dorset” team and gets on the bandwagon.

Dorset National Park Newsletter Summer 2020

In this Newsletter:

  • Michael Dower notes why National Parks are as important today as they were 75 years ago when his father, John Dower, recommended they be established as part of a post-WW2 vision for a better world;
  • We congratulate the South Downs National Park on what they have achieved in the first 10 years and welcome their priorities for the future;
  • We preview a new report on Youth Engagement, Health and Well-being and the achievements of National Parks in addressing these issues;
  • We chart a path towards a better future where a National Park in partnership with the Dorset Council and other partners would bring additional resources and expertise to help deliver a shared agenda Dorset-wide, creating opportunities and addressing the environmental and economic challenges we face together, and helping to secure a thriving, prosperous and sustainable future for our communities, economy and environment.

Hancock’s £13.4bn debt ‘write-off’ for NHS could cost hospitals millions every year

Matt Hancock’s promise to “write off” £13.4bn of debt owed by NHS trusts ahead of the worst of the coronavirus crisis could end up costing hospitals millions in annual payments back to the government, The Independent has learnt.

(Under Treasury rules PDC [public dividend capital], carries an annual 3.5 per cent charge, or dividend, to repay the taxpayer for its investment. A complex calculation based on a mix of the hospital’s assets determines how much money has to be paid each year and this depreciates as the assets age and lose value.)

Shaun Lintern Health Correspondent www.independent.co.uk 
Experts have warned that the way the government converted the billions of pounds owed by effectively insolvent NHS trusts will mean hospitals having to pay an annual charge on their assets back to the government in perpetuity.

It also failed to fix the underlying shortfall in hospital funding, with many trusts unable to meet the costs of providing services with the income they receive from NHS England. Without reform, some could build up debts again within a few years.

Anita Charlesworth, director of research and economics at the Health Foundation, told The Independent: “What the government has done is convert the debt into an equity share. Writing off this debt is not cost free. This is a better deal for NHS providers, but there will be a charge.”

The move created a “window of opportunity” for some trusts who had built up significant deficits to get back on a sustainable footing, she said.

“There is no guarantee of that. It remains the case that even with this, this reset is only really valuable if there’s enough revenue in the system to ensure that on an ongoing basis trusts have enough income to meet their day-to-day running costs and pay their PDC ​[public dividend capital],” she added.

“If there isn’t sufficient funding in the system, for the overwhelming majority of trusts, then we will be back in this position in a few years’ time.”

At the start of April, health secretary Matt Hancock announced the government was “writing off” £13.4bn of revenue debt, needed for day-to-day spending, which was owed by more than 100 NHS trusts. In total 107 NHS organisations had an average of £100m debt each, with two trusts having debts totalling £1bn.

The debt was built up during years of austerity as hospitals were forced to provide services with less and less income and many having to apply for interest bearing loans from the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC).

Some of these loans earned the DHSC interest of more than 6 per cent and pushed many hospitals further into the red.

By converting the debt into what is known as PDC, the government has effectively invested the sum of money owed by each hospital back into the trust. Normally PDC is used to fund capital works like the construction of new wards or buildings.

Under Treasury rules PDC carries an annual 3.5 per cent charge, or dividend, to repay the taxpayer for its investment. A complex calculation based on a mix of the hospital’s assets determines how much money has to be paid each year and this depreciates as the assets age and lose value.

Given the scale of debt converted to PDC, experts believe it is likely to still cost hospitals millions of pounds.

As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, experts say the NHS cost base – ie what it needs to provide healthcare – will be radically different to what it was before the pandemic and a new financial settlement with the government will be needed.

Emma Knowles, director of policy and research at the Healthcare Financial Management Association, the professional body for hospital finance directors, told The Independent: “Our members have been concerned about how cash flows around the NHS for some time now.

“The transfer of loans to public dividend capital is a pragmatic solution and is welcomed as it brings some certainty to managing working capital and the cash position in the short term. It also eliminates valuable management time spent constantly applying for and managing the short-term loans and recognises that some organisations would be unlikely to pay back the loans however long the term.”

But she added: “It is not, however, without cost. The organisations that have benefited from the transfer will continue to incur a cost each year on the new public dividend capital although it will no longer be in the form of interest payment. The impact will vary from organisation to organisation.”

She said the government’s decision solved past financial problems but that some NHS hospitals would need ongoing support to cover their costs or “the cycle will start again”.

She said adequate funding was needed for the NHS as a whole including a review of how money flows from the Treasury through the DHSC via NHS England to frontline NHS services.

A DHSC spokesperson said: “The NHS is on the front line in tackling this virus and we are incredibly grateful to the efforts of staff in helping to tackle this pandemic. We are aware that some trusts may have a higher overall finance cost following the write-off and adjustments will be made to ensure these trusts are not negatively affected by this.”

They did not address whether the DHSC would continue to require annual payments as required by existing rules on public dividend capital.

The government has promised a review of the PDC dividend rate and said any change will apply to all organisations.

UK government urged to protect access to cash for most vulnerable

Vulnerable people risk being unable to access the money they need to pay for goods and services, unless the government acts to support the “fragile” cash system, the consumer group Which? has warned.

Hilary Osborne www.theguardian.com 

The coronavirus crisis has accelerated the adoption of contactless and other cashless transactions across the UK and led to sharp drops in ATM use as more people shop online or opt for what they perceive to be safer payment methods.

However, research by Which? found that many of those who had been unable to shop for themselves had used cash to reimburse friends and family who had stepped in to help.

A survey of more than 2,000 people carried out for the group found that one in five were helping someone else, either by managing their finances or shopping for food or essentials. Of these, 51% had been reimbursed in cash.

The research also found that one in 10 people had tried to pay a retailer in cash and been refused.

In March’s budget the government said it would legislate to protect access to cash for as long as people needed it after the Access to Cash Review warned that more than 8 million UK adults would struggle to cope in a cashless society.

Debit cards overtook notes and coins as the main form of spending in 2017, and at that point it was predicted that cash would fall to just 16% of payments within a decade.

However, the crisis has accelerated the fall in cash use. At the start of April the limit for contactless payments was increased to £45, making it an option for more purchases.

Cash machine operators have reported a huge drop in the number of withdrawals. Link, for example, said it saw a 60% fall in April, although it said £1bn a week was still being withdrawn.

Which? said the government should act to ensure people could continue to use cash to pay for essential goods and services during the pandemic, including providing information for businesses on how to accept cash safely. It also urged the government to bring forward legislation before people are cut off from cash.

Gareth Shaw, head of money at Which?, said: “Failure to do so risks excluding millions of people from engaging in the economy.

It’s vital that the already fragile cash system is not left to collapse completely as the UK’s shift to a cashless society accelerates.”

Labour’s shadow economic secretary to the Treasury, Pat McFadden, said the research showed the “urgent need” to protect free access to cash.

“The impact of lockdown has accelerated the decline in the use of cash overall but it still remains a crucial means of paying for many people,” he said.

“Without clear legislation, we risk the creation of cash deserts. We cannot allow financial exclusion of those who rely on cash purchases and face-to-face banking.”

Planning applications for East Devon validated last week

Since EDDC seems to be getting back to business but not quite Owl hopes ,”as usual”, here is the list of planning applications validated last week:

 

Coronavirus why R is not the only number that matters

Many of Owl’s readers have been looking at the article on high rates of R in the South West – but it isn’t the only important metric governing the rate of infection spread.

K number: what is the coronavirus metric that could be crucial as lockdown eases?

Nicola Davis www.theguardian.

When deciding how and when lockdown restrictions will be lifted across the UK, the government has said the R value, denoting how many people on average one infected person will themselves infect, is crucial. But experts say another metric is becoming increasingly important: K.

What is K?

K sheds light on the variation behind R. “Some [infectious] people might generate a lot of secondary cases because of the event they attend, for example, and other people may not generate many secondary cases at all,” said Dr Adam Kucharski, an expert in the dynamics of infectious diseases at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

“K is the statistical value that tells us how much variation there is in that distribution.”

But unlike R, K numbers are not intuitive. “The general rule is that the smaller the K value is, the more transmission comes from a smaller number of infectious people,” said Kucharski.

“Once K is above about five or 10 it tells you most people are generating pretty similar numbers [of secondary cases], you are not getting these super-spreading events. Once K is below one, you have got the potential for super-spreading.”

Is K fixed, or does it fluctuate with public health measures, like R does?

As with the rate of transmission, there is a K valuethat relates to transmission when you do not have any control measures in place. Once measures are implemented, however, the distribution in transmission changes. “It is unlikely that with lockdown measures in place you’d see a lot of super-spreading events simply because there aren’t any opportunities for them,” said Kucharski. “So if you were to analyse that data, you’d probably calculate a different K value because you have got those control measures changing the dynamics of interactions.”

What is the K number for Covid-19?

In the absence of public health measures, “the values that are coming out for Covid-19 seems to be between about 0.1 and 0.5,” said Kucharski. That, he says, means that in the early stages of an outbreak about 10-20% of infections probably generate about 80% of the transmission.

In other words, super-spreading matters – a reality highlighted by reports such as that from South Korea where one individual is thought to have infected dozens of others by attending church.

But Kucharski cautioned against the use of the term super-spreader. “I think we do have to be really careful about blaming people because often it is not really much about the person, it is much more about the environment they happened to be in while they were infectious,” he said.

Why is K important?

Knowing the K value helps to inform what sort of public health measures may help to reduce R.

“If we can identify and reduce the situations that are disproportionately driving transmission, then that suggests that we could actually have potentially quite a lot less disruptive measures in place, but still keep the reproduction number low,” said Kucharski.

But it could also be important for test-and-trace measures, he said. “If cases occur at random, it’s very hard to track down and stop every chain of transmission. But if cases cluster together, and we can identify those clusters, testing and tracing directed at these situations could have a disproportionate effect on reducing transmission.”

How might the relaxation of the lockdown affect ?

Lockdown reduces the chances of a single infectious person spreading the disease to others. “Obviously if you start to allow larger gatherings, have larger workplaces, if you have other types of interaction starting, then that does increase the chance that one infection could spread to more people than it would have been able to a couple of weeks ago,” said Kucharski. “It could decrease the K, but it could also increase the R.”

The Devon car parks that are now charging (and the ones that aren’t)

As the lockdown begins to ease with more measures relaxed, life is beginning to get back to normal across Devon – and that includes car parking charges.

Daniel Clark www.devonlive.

Across the county in the majority of areas, changes were made to car parking charges which meant that car parks were either free or at a much reduced rate.

But now with some non-essential retail shops beginning to reopening and the country attempting to recover from the coronavirus crisis, parking charges in most car parks are now back in force.

The Local Democracy Reporting Service takes a look at the various restrictions and charges across Devon.

TEIGNBRIDGE

Normal fees and charges apply and existing permits remain valid in all car parks. Non-essential workers should pay the appropriate charges.

Those essential workers and volunteers who are travelling to perform an essential role will receive free car parking. These are:

  • All blue light service staff
  • NHS and private health care workers
  • Social care workers
  • Businesses and volunteers delivering essential food and medicine.

EXETER

Mary Arches Street Car Park and John Lewis Car Park are closed. Residents’ parking permits in all surface car parks during the outbreak are being accepted.

Normal fees and charges apply and existing permits remain valid in all car parks. Non-essential workers should pay the appropriate charges.

EAST DEVON

The winter offer of all day parking for £2 that was extended for April and May has been extended by a further week. There is free parking for NHS staff, Social Care staff and volunteers in all EDDC pay and display car parks who display valid ID/permit/key worker status

SOUTH HAMS

Normal parking charges will apply in all of car parks from June 1

WEST DEVON

Normal parking charges in all car parks have already been reintroduced

MID DEVON

Normal fees and charges apply and existing permits remain valid in all car parks. Non-essential workers should pay the appropriate charges. Free parking in all car parks is offered to essential workers who display valid ID/permit/key worker status

NORTH DEVON

Charging in NDC car parks in Ilfracombe, Hele, Mortehoe and Croyde resumed on Saturday 23 May. To avoid the risk of infection, the machines will not be taking cash and customers are advised to use the RingGo system or contactless payment card to pay. Parking charges remain suspended in all other North Devon Council-owned car parks until further notice

TORRIDGE

Parking charges in Torridge District Council car parks will be suspended until June 15.

DEVON COUNTY COUNCIL

All parking charges for on-street car parks and residents’ parking permits areas have resumed

TORBAY

Parking charges both on and off street are in operation at all times.

Key workers who work or volunteer for the NHS and social care to support our most vulnerable residents will continue to get free parking in council operated parking areas, providing the relevant paperwork is displayed on vehicle dashboards, and they are on duty where use of their car is necessary

East Devon District Council chairman, Cllr Stuart Hughes, resigns. New leader says it’s a relief.

Once again Cllr Stuart Hughes rehearses his reasons for resigning form his “non-political” office as Chairman of EDDC.

In this article we hear the other side of the story from new Leader Paul Arnott. In measured terms he puts the record straight saying: “East Devon people must find these graceless political knockabouts pretty shameful, and I agree. So here are some facts……”

Daniel Clark and Philippa Davies www.sidmouthherald.co.uk 

The chairman of East Devon District Council has resigned from his role, claiming that the current ruling group of councillors have ‘no relevant experience, proven skills or clear and obvious plan.’

Cllr Stuart Hughes confirmed on Monday, June 1 that he has stepped down from his chairmanship role but will remain as a councillor.

Speaking to this title, he said he had ‘thought about it very seriously over the weekend’ and decided to ‘do the decent thing’.

The newly elected leader of EDDC, Councillor Paul Arnott described the resignation as a ‘relief’.

In his resignation letter to EDDC’s chief executive, Mark Williams, Cllr Hughes said he has ‘no wish to continue or be considered for a second term of office as Civic Head of a Council seemingly set on a deliberate downward spiral’.

He said he had enjoyed his second term as chairman, which is not a political role, with ‘the support of the very professional officers at the council and most members from a variety of political persuasions’.

The letter continues: “Unfortunately, continual posturing and ‘game playing’ by some members of the council on a daily basis during the Covid-19 crisis has resulted in chaos and confusion because of petty rivalries between the EDA (East Devon Alliance) and various Independent members of the council.

“This has seriously undermined the integrity and day to day work of the council and my role as Chairman.”

“At this time all our efforts should be solely focused on how we can all help reduce the impact of the virus in East Devon whilst protecting our economy, not playing politics between various parties and independent groups to temporarily satisfy a small clique’s personal ambitions.”

Two extraordinary meetings of the full council were held on Thursday, May 28 and Friday, May 29. The second meeting saw Cllr Paul Arnott elected as the new leader of the council following the earlier resignation of Cllr Ben Ingham from the role.

In his acceptance speech he said that he said that the dignified thing for Cllr Hughes to have done would have been to have stepped down from the role and that he came very close to calling for his resignation.

Speaking on Monday, Cllr Arnott said: “It is a relief to see Cllr Hughes leave the chair at East Devon. He took the opportunity provided by a change in legislation by the government to prematurely cancel the annual council meeting, and this decision has predictably created five meetings at a time of crisis to do the same business.

“I have no doubt that he hoped for an outcome where he simply stayed in the chair for a second year, described by his leader last week as ‘the regular term’, wrong constitutionally and undesirable politically.

“He claims to have filled the chair as a ‘civic’ role, but this sweeping statement on his way out parrots Tory press releases.

“East Devon people must find these graceless political knockabouts pretty shameful, and I agree. So here are some facts. The new Cabinet has a new portfolio role dedicated to Covid-19 response and recovery, and this week is filled with meetings to get that going. It has a new portfolio role for Climate Action, essential for environment and economic recovery, and again the unit of four looking at all this is already meeting. It has a four-person unit looking at the broad spectrum of finances, necessary because of the millions of pounds projected black holes left by the outgoing Tories exacerbated by their own government.

“The Cabinet of 10 has five former Cabinet members and an array of highly experienced people from business and local government. And crucially we have a stable majority of 32 who voted for us to take over, following the motion of non-confidence in the last Leader by Cllr Hughes’ own Conservative colleagues as the virus swept across Europe in February, and then that Leader’s resignation in the last fortnight.

“All that said, I wish Cllr Hughes best wishes for his imminent county council campaign and for his unique ongoing work as a local radio disc jockey.”

A meeting will be held on Monday, June 8 to elect a new chairman and vice-chairman for the 2020/21 year.

BREAKING: ‘Game playing’ forces Sidmouth’s Stuart Hughes to resign as district council chairman

Sidmouth county and district councillor Stuart Hughes has resigned as EDDC Chairman today.

(But not with grace or dignity – Owl)

Joseph Bulmer sidmouth.nub.news 

Mr Hughes has resigned from the role of Chairman with immediate effect, calling attempts to blame him for the abandonment of an extraordinary meeting of the council on May 27 the ‘final straw’.

The Chairman of East Devon is the Civic Head of the Council and is not a political role.

Last week the council came under new leadership following the resignation of former leader councillor Ben Ingham and his cabinet.

The 60-strong council is now being run by an administration of 31 councillors from both the Democratic Alliance and the Independent Progressive Group, led by councillor Paul Arnott.

In his resignation letter Mr Hughes warns that council tax may rise, ‘as the new administration fails to balance ambition with reality’.

Here’s the letter Mr Hughes wrote to EDDC CEO Mark Williams: “I have very much enjoyed my second term as Chairman of EDDC, together with the support of the very professional officers at the council and most members from a variety of political persuasions.

“Unfortunately, continual posturing and ‘game playing’ by some members of the council on a daily basis during the COVID-19 crisis has resulted in chaos and confusion because of petty rivalries between the EDA and various Independent members of the council. This has seriously undermined the integrity and day to day work of the council and my role as Chairman. The party leader of the East Devon Alliance and the new “Democratic Alliance” aggressively saying I am responsible for
the abandonment of the Extraordinary meeting of EDDC on the 27th of May is the final straw.

“At this time all our efforts should be solely focused on how we can all help reduce the impact of the virus in East Devon whilst protecting our economy, not playing politics between various parties and independent groups to temporarily satisfy a small clique’s personal ambitions.

“There is no obvious and clear strategy from the Democratic Alliance (including what is left of the Lib Dems and a mixed bag of others) and the new Independent grouping, other than pipe dreams. I’ve seen no evidence of how changes to plans or services might be costed, and fear council tax will rise across East Devon as the new administration fails to balance ambition with reality. They also need to recognise that £72m has been given to EDDC by the Conservative government to help hundreds of individuals and businesses throughout the pandemic.

“I have no wish to continue or be considered for a second term of office as Civic Head of a Council seemingly set on a deliberate downward spiral. This is despite the former Conservative administration at EDDC leaving office with a set of balanced books and ‘Money in the Bank’ at the start of the new council in 2019. Like many other councillors and members of the public, I remain totally in the dark as to how the latest version of a coalition of so called Independents and others will deal with old and new challenges facing the Council, on top of the added burden of COVID-19
on services to residents of East Devon.

“For these reasons, I cannot support an administration with no relevant experience, proven skills or clear and obvious plan. I therefore resign my role as Chairman of EDDC with immediate effect.”

Nub News has contacted the Democratic Alliance for a response to Mr Hughes’ resignation.

 

Comment on Tories near-hysterical reaction to change

As a correspondent points out:

Is “Business as Usual” compatible with the “New Normal”?  Does age confer wisdom?

It seems that, since the regime change at East Devon District Council last week, the district’s minority-group Tory councillors (just 19 out of 60) has developed a near-hysterical reaction to the change.

Their first reaction is that no change should be made while Covid 19 is a major problem.

This is weird – because, up to now, all decisions on Covid 19 have been made either by officers (administering local grants and loans from national sources) and Ben Ingham’s dysfunctional Cabinet – which had only been in power for one year!  During that one year, the last six months saw the fracturing of support for Ingham and the threat of a Conservative-led vote of o confidence in him.  Is this the “continuity” the Tories desired?  What exactly has been their winning formula for dealing with Covid 19.  Most initiatives have been local, non-political ones – uniting people rather than dividing them on party lines – surely the correct approach.

Secondly, as one who watched the 3 chaotic meetings last week, one theme kept cropping up from Tory apologists as a reason they (and their mates) should once again rule the roost – because they always have done.

Little nuggets such as:

–    Moulding should be Leader because he has spent 33 years on the council, he’s done some voluntary work and that he could be trusted because he’s an obsessive cricket fan (Somerset!) and so would naturally “play fair”.  Anyone remembering the shennanigans over planning at Millway Rise can surely put paid to that one!

–    A remark that Stuart Hughes should remain Chairman because he also serves on Devon County Council.  That one can be shot down with one word “Potholes”!  And there are rumblings that Mr Hughes is seen more often in Yeovil than in Sidmouth these days …..

It seems that Tories –  decimated at the election last year simply cannot accept that the district voted them OUT.  They cannot conceive of anything other than being IN.

In, out, in out – shake it all about … that’s what people voted for and that is what has finally been achieved.  Suck it up, Tories!  It’s the “new normal” in district politics!

Who shot our Fox? – Tories complain about leadership change

This empty refrain has surfaced even sooner than Owl believed possible.

They are still in deep denial.

Conservative EDDC’s Chairman Cllr Stuart Hughes attempts to thwart change as a partner in a minority coalition by cancelling the EDDC Annual Meeting, when all posts are reaffirmed or not, have failed. Problem for the East Devon Tories is that don’t have an understanding of democracy. Never mind they will learn.

For picture of Councillor Moulding EDDC Conservative Leader with caption “I nominate myself!” see www.radioexe.co.uk 

East Devon Tories complain about leadership change

www.radioexe.co.uk 

Then immediately call for another one!

When local elections came midway through the parliamentary Brexit debacle of 2019, voters in East Devon took the opportunity to tell the ruling Conservatives, who had led the council since pre-historic times, to metaphorically sling their hook. Just 19 Tories were voted onto East Devon District Council last year, putting them in the minority, and bringing the opportunity for a fresh start under control of independent councillors. A year on, the independent who led the council, Ben Ingham, a former Tory, was dethroned by other independents and a replaced with a new independent.

Now Conservative councillors are complaining about the distraction caused by the leadership change – and then have immediately called for another one, with them in charge!

Leader of the Tories on the council, Andrew Moulding, says: “As Conservatives, we are focusing all our efforts to help reduce the impact of the virus in East Devon, supporting members of our community. I’m incredibly disappointed that various factions’ members, elected to EDDC, think it’s a good idea to change leadership of the council for no obvious reason, during the Covid-19 crisis. My added concern is that this is not for the good of the people in East Devon or their best interests, but merely to satisfy their personal ambition.”

Such is the distress of diverting attention from tackling the virus with unnecessary leadership contests, that Councillor Goulding sic.[Moulding?]. presumably with a straight face, is putting himself forward to be leader of the council instead. Although he doesn’t say this bit in the East Devon Tory statement issued on Sunday, the Tories have less than a third of the seats. The leadership group formed last week has cobbled together an alliance of 31 councillors to take control, but Councillor Moulding is worried that other groups on the council “have no experience of council leadership,” – the logical conclusion being that elections are pretty much a waste of time, as, up until last year, only Conservatives ran the council.

Councillor Moulding says he understands why the electorate gave the Tories “a bloody nose” last year, “largely and overwhelmingly as a protest against Brexit delays.”

In the week that the Conservative government is recalling MPs to parliament and abandoning electronic voting in the House of Commons, the Conservative group on East Devon Council is also urging all councillors to postpone non-urgent meetings, possibly until May 2021.