“Ask difficult questions, rock the boat, annoy and upset powerful people …”

In an article titled “These failures show that Rotherham is not alone” by Gaby Hinsliff in today’s Guardian:

… “Casey signalled that an unhealthy culture had become embedded partly because this was a solidly Labour council, one where there was not much political opposition, but also officers who knew the same old people would be re-elected next time. It didn’t do to fall out with them. The same will be true not just in solidly Tory councils but in any organisation where people stay forever, where problem employees aren’t confronted but kicked upstairs.

And that’s why all institutions need faintly oddball, stubborn, counter-cultural people who may well be irritating to work with but ask the questions others don’t. Several of the MPs who have campaigned on institutional child abuse have the same quality; so do most of the investigative reporters who have pursued the story and so arguably does Casey.

It is to be hoped that Goddard does too, because if sunlight is the best disinfectant then contrariness – the ability to ask difficult questions, rock the boat, annoy and upset powerful people – is a crucial second line of defence. An organisation that can listen when the wrong people are talking inside it has at least a chance of listening to the wrong people outside too.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/05/child-abuse-failures-rotherham-management

£9m council “palace”

“The town hall development would be funded by the authority, planning deals and private investors, say council documents.”

Now, where have we heard this before!

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/tower-hamlets-mayor-spends-9m-turning-old-hospital-into-council-palace-10028492.html

The dead cannot cry out for justice …

Touching tributes on the Sidmouth Herald front page, inner pages and letters page to the homeless man, Tommy Duffy, who died on a bitterly cold night in a bus shelter in Sidmouth. A memorial service was recently held for him at the Unitarian Church in Sidmouth

Comments on the Letters pages:

“What greater irony could there be. Tommy Duffy, a homeless man, dies in freezing temperatures, in an area where the local council is spending thousands of taxpayers’ money on a vanity project to relocate their offices”

and

“… we are in real trouble when our elected representatives are unable to make an empty building available to someone in need because their own take on profit, value and worth extends towhether they might one day sell it to Persimmon or Premier Inn. I don’t know, but just maybe there is a different way of doing this.”

“The dead cannot cry out for justice. It is a duty of the living to do so for them.”
Lois MacMaster Bujold

“Anchor stores”: regeneration or degeneration?

Tesco’s profits crisis means that plans for 49 shiny new stores have been ditched. Where does that leave places such as Kirkby, Bridgwater and Wolverhampton, where regeneration schemes linked to the supermarket chain now lie in ruins?
John Harris wrote a lengthy article in the G2 section of this week’s Guardian about two intertwined stories connected to Tesco’s financial crisis.

The first concerns the demise of what has effectively become Britain’s only viable model of regeneration, staking everything on an “anchor store”. This is the one size fits all policy EDDC uses. Does anyone out there have a clue what might replace it?

Here are some key extracts and below is a link to the full article.

By the mid-1990s, this regeneration strategy was well established: base your plans on an “anchor store” and attract one of the big four supermarkets. If you were lucky, whichever store had designs on your neighbourhood might extend its proposals to an entire retail development, and perhaps assent to a so-called Section 106 agreement (a reference to part of the 1990 Planning Act), and build not just a big store and a handful of satellite shops, but something for the local community: a new library, say, or a public square.

If you were less fortunate, you would just get a bog-standard supermarket. Throughout the 1990s and all the way up to the crash of 2008 and beyond, this was how whole swaths of Britain were rebuilt, and Tesco led the charge, to the point that it sometimes seemed to be a wing of government, and some people began to fear the dystopia crystallised in the title of Andrew Simms’s best-selling book Tescopoly. Now, though, Tesco is in retreat, and its sudden withdrawal from scores of places has left behind resentment, anger and what feels like a strange state of shock.”

The other side of the story concerns the fate of places that had either pinned all their hopes on Tesco’s arrival, or opposed its plans from the start. Of his three examples of towns now blighted by abandoned Tesco sites (listed above), the one closest to home is Bridgewater.

“On a freezing Tuesday afternoon in Bridgwater, the Somerset town that sits next to the M5, 35 miles south-west of Bristol, I meet some of the people who have spent six years opposing the now-abandoned plans for their town centre. The first thing I see is a vast expanse of grey gravel, extending into the distance: what would have been a cluster of shops surrounding a new Tesco, on a site between the town centre and the old docks, and eating into a much-used park called the Brewery Field.”

“This used to be the site of a big leisure centre, the Sedgemoor Splash, built in 1991 and based around a huge swimming pool with slides and wave machines, which, say some locals, attracted visitors from as far away as South Wales. But in 2009, Sedgemoor district council announced it was to close, claiming it was losing money and in need of repairs. ……..”

“A replacement pool was promised, but it took more than three years to open, on the site of a school a mile and a half out of town, well away from most local bus routes. A facility for people with learning difficulties on Tesco’s intended site – owned by Somerset county council, which, for some reason, donated £20,000 to Tesco’s planning fees – also had to find a new home. Given that Bridgwater already has a Sainsbury’s, an Asda and a Morrisons – as well as eight other supermarkets of various sizes – there was widespread bafflement about why the town needed another. Party politics were also streaked through the story: though Sedgemoor council is Conservative-run, Bridgwater has a long tradition of Labour-voting, and local politicians felt the Tesco plan was yet another example of folly and stupidity being imposed from outside.”

“The borough council finally approved Tesco’s plans in February 2013. Then, at the end of last year, news leaked out that Tesco was not coming after all. For Labour councillors Brian Smedley and Ian Tucker, and Glen Burrows, a local woman who is one of the founders of Bridgwater Forward, there is a mixture of relief and seething frustration at how this story played out.”

““I’m glad; I’m really glad,” says Burrows. “But it was market forces that stopped Tesco, not the fact that we had a massive campaign, and we had all the arguments. The council should have listened to us, and they didn’t. That’s the biggest lesson: the fact that we’ve got a problem with democracy.””

Ring any bells?

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/feb/03/betrayed-by-tesco-kirkby-bridgwater-wolverhampton-let-down-by-supermarket-regeneration
Tescopoly: How One Shop Came Out on Top and Why it Matters (Paperback – 29 Mar 2007) by Andrew Simms. ISBN: 978-1-84529-511-0

Local Plan – further setbacks – “complexities” cause delays

Full story, Page 6, Sidmouth Herald: Development blueprint suffers further setback

Our comment:

Why the delay? Councils need to show that they have co-operated with but not necessarily agreed with) adjacent authorities.

For us this means Exeter (and inevitably mopping up some of their housing need) and West Dorset – but EDDC decided, for no obvious reason, to add Mid- Devon, Teignbridge AND Dartmoor National Park into the mix. So we have to take into account the needs of Dartmoor National Park where almost no new building is allowed! Still, Exeter and Dartmoor have ex-EDDC planners at the helm, both of whom were very enthusiastic supporters of the East Devon Business Forum, so it will make for nice cosy chats.

AND Teignbridge and East Devon CEOs know each other well – having both been dragged before a Parliamentary Committee on Voter Engagement in December 2014 to explain why they had not been registering voters in their areas. Perhaps they shared a first-class railway carriage there and back!

The Planning Inspector who threw out the first draft Local Plan in March 2014 anticipated a re-hearing in October 2014 and cleared his diary in anticipation.

Looks like it won’t be going in his 2015 diary either.

The £750,000 already spent on relocation consultants (the figure not including officer time) could have had this wrapped up within the Inspector’s timeframe.

What was it Councillor Halse said about relocation: the council had “fallen flat on its face”? Seems to be making a habit of it.

Vision: with apologies to Coleridge and Kubla Khan

​​A Vision
​(with apologies to Coleridge)

​In Honiton E.D.D.C.
​Says its new offices shall be –
​Far from the town where, as we know,
​The office workers like to go.
​No longer all Knowle’s greenery
​But superstore and factory.
​An Exmouth office, too, a place
​Where few will find a parking space –
​The building looks like an old barn,
​Not like the “dome” in “Kubla Khan”.

​But, Oh, the waste of public money –
​The ratepayers don’t think it funny:
​To build a glass and concrete shed
​And trash the park and Knowle instead,
​For “Our Great Leader” and his crew
​Have no care for the public’s view;
​Nor badger-setts, nor many a tree;
​Nor office blocks, built ’83;
​Nor Chambers, used by you and me;
​Nor weekend tourist-parking, free;
​Nor jobs and trade Sidmouth will lose;
​Nor all the lovely parkland views –
​All sold to builders for a fee –
​And all for what? For vanity?
​This Council, with no Local Plan,
​Lets builders build where’er they can.

​Yet in my crystal ball I see
​A new look for E.D.D.C.:
​Independents there will be
​As councillors for you and me,
​Come from every town and shire
​With the Wright One to remove Swire,
​Who all will cry: Please be aware:
​We will not relocate somewhere
​Based on false claims that there will be
​“Big”(?) savings made in energy.
​We come to bring Democracy,
​And Probity, Transparency.
​You all know there’s a better way –
​It’s signposted by E.D.A.* ,
​So, all you readers, lend a hand
​And save our green and pleasant land.

​(*EDA is East Devon Alliance)

​by Mike Temple, Sidmouth (with permission of author)

Council forced to un-redact redacted information on housing viability assessment

No, not EDDC, though no doubt if we had any numbers available they would automatically want to redact them! But if any figures WERE redacted from developers affordable housing changes (Tesco, Seaton?) this probably means that they must now be revealed and may have major implications for all other “commercial confidentiality” excuses made by EDDC – past, present and future:

“The First-tier Tribunal has ordered a London council to disclose redacted information in a viability assessment that led to the authority allowing a developer to vary the amount of affordable housing on a major site.

The background to the case of Royal Borough of Greenwich v IC and Shane Brownie EA/2014/0122 was a deed of planning obligation dated 23 February 2004 concerning the development of the Greenwich Peninsula.

The commitments entered into by the developers included one that 38% of the more than 10,000 homes to be built would be ‘affordable’.

Following the 2008 financial crisis work on the development stalled. In 2012 there was a risk of a £50m housing grant being lost.

The developers approached the Royal Borough of Greenwich asking to be released from some of their promises to build affordable homes. The revised proposal – affecting 11 plots – moved some of the affordable homes from the more attractive areas of the site which have river views; the number of affordable homes was also reduced by about 500.
One of the developers, Quintain (whose interest has since been bought out by Knight Dragon), commissioned an ‘economic viability report’ from BNP Paribas.

Dated 23 January 2013, it stated on the cover “FOIA exemption Sections 41 and 43(2) Private and Confidential”. Paragraph 1.4 of the report said the report was being provided to the council on a confidential basis. It also requested that the report not be disclosed to third parties under FOIA.

The FTT noted that companies could ask for exemptions or exceptions to be considered, but they were not decision makers in relation to freedom of information. “That task falls to the public authority, the ICO and, sometimes, the Tribunal,” it said.

Greenwich asked another firm, Christopher Marsh & Co, to review the BNP Paribas report. Then, on 28 February 2013 the council’s planning board approved the proposed variation to the deed of planning obligation.

Two months later Knight Dragon approached the council again for the variation itself to be varied. This was approved by the planning board on 25 June 2013.

On 12 June a local resident, Shane Brownie, submitted an FOI request to obtain a copy of the financial viability report.
The council disclosed both the BNP Paribas report and a letter from Christopher Marsh & Co. However, both documents were subject to redactions under regulation 12(5)(e) governing confidential commercial information.

It was these redactions that were at the heart of the dispute. The Information Commissioner overturned the council’s decision to redact the documents. Greenwich appealed to the First-Tier Tribunal.

The FTT conducted a public interest balancing exercise as the exception under regulation 12(5)(e) only applies if in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining it outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. The presumption is in favour of disclosure.
The Tribunal said two factors told particularly in favour of disclosure:

The number of affordable homes to be provided on what was an enormous development, as well as their location, was an important local issue on which reasonable views were held strongly on both sides;

This was a case where a company, robust enough to take on the development of a huge site over a period of 20 years, acquiring its interest in 2012 and increasing its share in 2013, immediately asked to be relieved of a planning obligation freely negotiated by its predecessor. “It justifies this change on the basis of a downturn in house prices it knew about at the time of purchase, using a valuation model that looks at current values only and does not allow for change in the many factors that may affect a valuation over time. It seems to us that in those circumstances the public interest in openness about the figures is very strong.”

The Tribunal said: “Having weighed all the evidence and arguments, in our judgement the admittedly important public interests in maintaining the regulation 12(5)(e) exception in this case do not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information.”

The residents were represented by Michael Armitage, having also been advised during the proceedings by Julianne Kerr Morrison (both on a pro bono basis). Gerry Facenna acted for the Information Commissioner. All three are barristers at Monckton Chambers.

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=21663:tribunal-tells-council-to-disclose-redactions-from-housing-viability-assessment&catid=60&Itemid=28

What a buzz about East Devon Alliance!

In two of East Devon’s towns today and what a buzz about East Devin Alliance! People seem overjoyed to have a real local alternative the former major parties with much spleen vented! Absolutely the talk of the towns.

Seismic changes ahead, one feels.

Save Clyst St Mary..next meeting, 12 Feb 2015. Hugo Swire taking an interest.

Save Clyst St Mary Notice of meeting 12 Feb 15 (1)

Thank you to everyone for your support over and attending the meetings. A lot has been achieved in a very short space of time.

The Parish plan is progressing well and there is another meeting(Sorry!) on Thursday 12th February at 7.00pm this is to discuss the draft proposals of the village plan the venue is in the village hall. Once this plan becomes adopted it should help to stop our village from the continual threat of further large scale planning applications from developers!

Many of our residents have asked what our local MP is doing about all these planning applications and why Clyst St Mary has had so many in such a short space of time. Mike Howe has convinced Hugo Swire to come and talk to us on Thursday 19th February in the School Hall at 6.30pm (Sorry we couldn’t get the village hall it was already booked) I would really like to fill the hall to show how much support we have behind us and to ask what he is doing about it! Please Please come if you can.

Claire Wright’s odds improve yet again!

As of this evening:

Con 1/10
UKIP 10/1
Claire Wright 10/1
Lib Dems 50/1
Labour 100/1

Recall that Claire Wright started out at 66/1 and Hugo Swire at (as we recall) 1/18. A truly astonishing reversal of fortunes – and still 3 months to go.

If you want a truly LOCAL MP who has devoted herself for years to fighting on local issues and has a sound track record on them, she really is the only choice.

Hugo Swire has rarely been here over the last 5 years as his Foreign Office travels take precedence, the UKIP candidate moved here only when his candidacy was announced a few months ago (though still retaining his family home elsewhere), the Lib Dems have yet to reveal their candidate and the Labour candidate dropped out last week and has not yet been replaced.

Remember if you want to bet responsibly and you are over 18, betting can be found under:

Politics/General/Election/Constituencies/Devon East
(NOT East Devon)

And clever those who got in at 66/1!