EDDC ” public servant” should consider his position

Just in case anyone doesn’t realise who the “public servant” is – it is Mark Williams, CEO of East Devon District Council. And maybe here, we should see what his “union” [aptly called SOLACE – Society of Local Authority Chief Executives] says about the role and contrast this with what is reported later on:

At its most simple, the role has four principle aspects:
 Managerial leadership of the organisation;

 Providing and securing advice to the Council on strategy and policy;

 Acting in an executive capacity by making decisions or ensuring a system is in place for other officers to make decisions, as authorised by the Council; and

 Delivering probity, value for money and continuous improvement.”

Click to access SOLACE_response_CO_Pay_Inquiry_140130.pdf

Nowhere does it mention insulting members of the public or whole TOWNS!

THE LETTER TO THE PRESS:

“The conduct and comments of EDDC’s most senior officer at last week’s Extra Ordinary Council Meeting, continue to cause shock waves in the press.
The letter copied below, from Save Our Sidmouth member, Robert Crick, appears in Pullman’s View from Sidmouth (9th February, 2016).

‘On behalf of the Save Our Sidmouth campaign our widely respected neighbour Richard Eley read a short statement during public questions before last Thursday’s District Council meeting. The statement expressed regret at the problems the Local Plan process had caused over the past few years, and reminded members that residents regarded the proposal to build an industrial estate on the Sidford Flood Plain as an act of folly.

Mr Eley then stated that since this process has now come to an end, Save Our Sidmouth recommends a fresh start to rebuild trust between the authority and the town of Sidmouth.

After putting their questions, members of the public then witnessed a remarkable event.

A non-elected public servant appropriated elected councillors’ speaking privileges by rounding on the people of Sidmouth. He angrily blamed us for having delayed the process by daring to question the Council’s original proposals. He then denounced Mr Eley personally, claiming he had called Inspector Thickett “an idiot”.

Challenged by the meeting, he refused to acknowledge that he had misrepresented Mr Eley’s words. When forced to admit his error, he absolutely refused to apologise.

Councillor Stuart Hughes, Chair of the Council, finally gave a dignified apology, which allowed the elected members to proceed and adopt the Local Plan.

It was evident to all that the paid official has a deep-rooted and obsessive personal animosity to the town and people of the Sid valley, which must surely disqualify him from a continuing role as a servant of East Devon. Perhaps it is time for him to consider his position.‘

Public servant at centre of ‘remarkable event’ should ‘consider his position’

Electoral Reform Society compiling interactive map of “rotten boroughs” – stick YOUR pin in it!

Rotten Boroughs – Tell us your story

One Party States. Uncontested seats. There’s something very wrong with local government in England and Wales.

Campaign background

Good local government depends on decent local democracy. But many of us are now living in Rotten Boroughs – unaccountable and unresponsive, where our votes don’t make a difference.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

You can help us win the argument for fair votes in England and Wales. Have you been let down by local democracy? Do you live in a Rotten Borough?

http://action.electoral-reform.org.uk/ea-action/action?ea.client.id=1754&ea.campaign.id=21160

Is the Local Government Ombudsman fit-for-purpose?

“LGO Watch is far from the work of a few disgruntled complainants, even the LGO’s own customer satisfaction survey revealed that a whopping 73% of complainants were dissatisfied by the outcome of their individual cases. Since its founding in 2003, the Watch has amassed a legion of supporters nationwide, and a similar Scottish watch has since been set up to target the corruption in local government north of the border.

With less than 2% of submitted complaints declared by the LGO as maladministration, there is a certain weight to the claims that the tax-funded service is not wholly committed to securing justice for the public.

One reason the LGO Watch provides to explain allegations of pro-council bias within the office is the alarming fact that all three current LGOs were themselves previously chief executives of local authorities. In fact evidence shows that many of the LGO’s investigators previously worked in local government.

If you took a damning complaint about the local police force to an independent, publicly-funded investigation and adjudication group, would it be fair to have a former chief of that same organisation handle your case? …”

http://www.complaintexpert.co.uk/can-we-trust-ombudsman-with-our-complaints.html

Moirai expands further in Swindon – free skate park may be at risk

“Moirai Capital Investments are seeking approval for their 31 acre (12.5ha) leisure development which will be built adjacent to and around the newly refurbished Oasis Leisure Centre at North Star.

But although the outline plans mention a skate park – at the moment it is not clear whether it will be a free to use outdoor one to replace the current facility on the site or an indoor paid-for one.

A campaign to save the free outdoor facility has been launched by Diana Kirk of ATBSkate Warehouse at Hawksworth but she believes that their pleas are being ignored as it appears on the plans that it will be an indoor site. You can sign the petition, which so far has over 1,o00 signatures at:
http://www.bit.ly/oasis-skate

… The plans submitted by Moirai include:

• Up to 50,000 square metres of mixed leisure including a cinema, 5,000 seat entertainment arena, ski centre and other leisure uses which could include a crazy golf centre, comedy club, laser tag and skate park;

• Up to 12,000sqm of restaurants and cafes

• Up to 12,000sqm retail space, with a minimum of 9,000sqm of sports retailing;

• Up to 9,000sqm for a hotel.

The vast £120 million leisure scheme will be one of the largest projects of its type in the UK.

Moirai chairman Martin Barber said: “This is a crucial step in the process of delivering this major development. Getting to this point has been complex, with consideration given to the best possible layout for the project, but also to address issues such as traffic management and the potential environmental impact of the development.”

Coun Garry Perkins, Swindon Cabinet Member for Economy, Regeneration & Skills said: “The application represents another step in this exciting project. I am satisfied that now Moirai have put together a proposal that matches the council’s ambitions; I look forward to hearing more as they get closer to turning these plans into a reality .

“These are only the outline plans and until we see the detailed ones it is difficult to say what form the skate park will take, but at least it is part of the plans at the moment.”

It is believed that many visitors to the facility will arrive by train, as Swindon’s station is only a short distance away. Forward Swindon has completed a feasibility study for a new pedestrian crossing over the mainline, adjacent to the station, connecting the north and south parts of the town centre. Seeking funding for the crossing is the next stage.

Chris Hitchings, director of development at Forward Swindon, said: “Swindon is well connected to a huge, affluent catchment. The arena and ski centre, for example, will provide Swindon with high profile destinations to compete with the likes of Cardiff, Bristol and Milton Keynes.”

Future of free skate park at Oasis in doubt. World’s skateboard legend Tony Hawk signs Swindon campaign petition

How a contract between Swindon Borough Council and Moirai Capital Investments changed over time

An article about how a contract between Swindon Borough Council and Moirai Capital Investments for the development of the Oasis leisure facility changed over time

From a blog written in 2014:

Given the importance of the Oasis example to the council’s plans for the future of the leisure centres, I think we should try to find out what is actually going on there. Here are some facts:

• The agreement between SBC and Moirai was signed in March 2012. In January 2013, the lease was varied at the request of Moirai. The revised terms included the following:

• Moirai’s obligation to provide a minimum area of development on the Oasis site was lifted.

• SBC gave up its option to purchase back the Oasis if no development takes place.

• Should recovery of debt be required as a result of loan default, the bank would be able to sell the lease into the open market.

• In January 2011 the Council invited expressions of interest to build a new leisure centre based on the former Clares site. The plan originally submitted by Moirai showed a ski centre, 7,500 seat arena and hotel on the Clares site.

However, in March 2013, Moirai presented a revised plan for the site, moving the arena (reduced to 6,500 seats) to the south side of the Oasis and apparently leaving half the Clares site vacant.

• Moirai said an application for outline planning application would be submitted in June 2013 (it had previously been expected in March that year).

• At the beginning of May 2014, the application had still not appeared on the council’s planning pages. An application for outline planning permission is now expected later in 2014.

• Oasis Operations Ltd, a management company set up by Moirai, was declared insolvent in 2013 (The London Gazette). The directors, who had resigned earlier in the year, are currently named by online data company Companycheck as directors of other Moirai companies.

• According to Companycheck, at the beginning of May 2014 two of the Moirai companies, Oasis Waterpark Ltd and Moirai Capital Investments (Swindon) Ltd, had recommended credit limits of £0.00. Companycheck could not assign them a risk score as it was too long since they filed audited accounts.

On 8 May 2014 Oasis Waterpark Ltd. had filed accounts and the credit limit has been raised to £25,000 with a credit score of 40 out of 100.

According to the lease variation referred to above, Oasis Waterpark Ltd is the company with the lease on the Oasis.

the time the agreement was signed in March 2012, Mr Martin Barber was described as the Chairman of Moirai. Mr Barber’s directorship of Moirai Capital Investments Ltd ended on 17 February 2014. (CompanyCheck)

• Mr Barber said in March 2012: “We are ready to press forward enthusiastically with the first phase, the refurbishment of the Oasis Leisure Centre. . . We have already plans in hand for the replacement of the Dome”.

I don’t know anything about finance, and I do not know what is going on at the Oasis. Clearly these little gobbets of information do not present anything like the whole picture, and they may well be misleading.

However, I question whether, as early as March 2013, when the Council report included the option of “an Oasis type deal”, the council should not have been keeping a closer eye on developments at the Oasis.

I question whether Swindon people should feel confident that the Oasis provides an encouraging model for the future of their leisure centres and golf courses.

In the light of the lease variation agreed in January 2013, I question whether Swindon people can have any confidence that the terms of a lease agreed with a private sector operator to take over the leisure centres and golf courses will not be altered in future at the request of the leaseholder.

And I question whether the Oasis model suggests that Swindon Borough Council is professionally equipped to make a deal with private sector operators over the future of the leisure centres and golf courses which will be to the advantage of the town.”

The Oasis, Swindon Leisure Centres & the Golf Courses


We also note that several other Moirai companies have appeared in the London Gazette notices of being struck off. Sometimes this is because compulsory information required of companies has not been filed within proper time limits, sometimes it isn’t.

It is usually considered preferable for a company’s reputation and the reputation of its directors to (a) file accounts on time and/or (b) voluntarily wind up a company rather than have it struck off.

This year’s Tory Black and White Ball: a “glittering” guest list

Remember that, at the same time, the government is attempting to cut Labour Party donations and the money provided to smaller parties and independent parties in the UK.

“Standard” tables at the back of the room with a junior minister or MP were£5,000 each, “Premium” tables nearer to the PMs table with a senior minister £10,000, “Premium” table with a top Cabinet Minister or Boris Johnson AND a ” brush” with the PM £15,000.

Guests at the dinner and auction included

… “Access Industries — owned by Britain’s richest man, £13.17billion
oligarch Leonard Blavatnik — secured a prime spot as ministers including Jeremy Hunt and Michael Gove worked the room. Blavatnik has been criticised for his links to Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Jewellery tycoon Ranbir Singh Suri was also understood to have attended. He became embroiled in a “cash for peerages row” after he was made a Lord in 2014. Other guests included:

DEPARTMENT store owner Christopher Fenwick and Indian entrepreneur Ranjit Baxi, both caught up in a separate “cash for access” scandal after paying £50,000 to dine with the PM in 2014.

REAL-ESTATE brothers Eddie and Sol Zakay, worth £2.2billion through their Topland Group investment firm, who settled out of court with the Ministry of Justice in 2012 after allegedly extracting inflated rents from the Government.

SECRETIVE private members club United and Cecil, which has handed more than £500,000 to the party while taking advantage of a loophole in electoral laws which means its supporters can remain anonymous.”

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6921115/Inside-the-Prime-Minister-secretive-Black-and-White-fundraiser-party.html

MP who wants to drop Human Rights Act uses it as a reason to protect MPs who are arrested!

“TOP eurosceptic minister Chris Grayling was today branded a “hypocrite” for backing new rules that block arrested MPs’ names being published.

MPs say the change is needed because revealing their identities breaches their “right to privacy” under the European Convention of Human Rights.

Yet Mr Grayling, an outspoken critic of the Human Rights Act who has said it should be scrapped, will be the cabinet minister to propose the change to the Commons today.

Labour MP John Mann said: “What a hypocrite. He only wants the Human Rights Act to apply to himself, not to the rest of the country.”

Labour’s Mr Mann also warned it could mean MPs fighting an election while voters are unaware they have been arrested.”

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/electorate-has-a-right-to-know-the-names-of-mps-who-have-been-arrested-a3176931.html

“The Budleigh Boys” part 3

The enthusiasm of the Budleigh Boys to dismiss the importance of the AONB and give greater weight to the economics of Pooh Cottage was not shared by Budleigh Salterton Town Council of which all three district councillors are members. The Town Council had recommended refusal.

At their January meeting the Town’s mayor expressed his surprise that the application was approved. But he was told it was alright as Councillor Dent felt the Highways Report was wrong and more traffic movements would not be created. This was endorsed by Councillor Tom Wright who thinks the result is a good solution.

This is a worrying trend by Budleigh Salterton District Councillors who know better than the planners and statutory bodies and also their Town Council.

An application to demolish a house which makes a “positive contribution to the conservation area” (Historic England) is awaiting decision. It was recommended for refusal by the Town Council.

The EDDC Conservation Officer writes that “Advice given at the pre-application stage concluded that the principle of demolition would be unacceptable on account of the contribution that the existing house makes to the character and appearance of the conservation area.” He concludes that “the proposed demolition should be considered unacceptable and the application refused.” The Environment Agency also has reservations due to the history of flooding in the area.

So what does a Budleigh Boy write?

“I am pleased to see the design of the new build is very similar to the existing and the increase in foot print, in my view, is not over development. I consider the plans to be acceptable and will provide 9 small dwellings, convenient to the town “

Word also has it that the two other boys feel the same.

RIP AONB, RIP special character of Budleigh? “Small dwellings” at any price?

MPs pay rises for second time in less than a year

MPs will see their salaries rise by almost £1,000 after the parliamentary pay watchdog signed off another increase. …

… The £952 rise comes just months after the body pushed through a controversial 10 per cent salary increase despite opposition from some MPs and trade unions. …

… It will take the basic wage for all 650 MPs to £74,962 a year, with ministers earning up to another £68,000 on top of that.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/12149835/MPs-pay-to-rise-by-another-1000-just-months-after-10-per-cent-salary-hike-signed-off.html

Government committee criticises housing association “right to buy”

… “the Communities and Local Government committee says the funding model it is using, which will force councils to compensate housing associations with the money raised from council house sales, is “extremely questionable” and is effectively a “levy” on councils.

It says the scheme should be funded by central government and questions how ministers are going to meet their target of replacing every property sold off with a new one. …

… Committee chairman Clive Betts said: “The fundamental success of this policy depends not just on whether more tenants come to own their home but on whether more homes are built.

“The government needs to set out in more detail how it will meet its target of at least one-for-one replacement of the sold homes, particularly given issues such as the availability of land, the capacity of the building industry and the uncertainty of income from council home sales.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35534463