Swire will talk about East Devon in Parliament as he sees fit

“Some of my detractors locally consistently point to my not mentioning East Devon in Parliament although I have repeatedly pointed out that as a Government Minister I was only able to speak to my brief. Of course it didn’t suit some to believe that but that is the case. But now no such restrictions apply and I am free to question and debate anything I choose. Liberated from office I can mention East Devon as much as I see fit.”

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/east_devon_mp_hugo_swire_back_to_the_back_benches_1_4623156

How about not just mentioning East Devon when you see fit (translation: much more in an election year than at any other time) but REPRESENTING EAST DEVON and talking about the district when it is needed, not just when it suits YOU.

Oh, and we look forward to seeing you have surgeries on a weekly basis.

Pity Jeremy Hunt, pity the NHS, pity the patients

” …Without a change of tack, Hunt is likely to become the minister for the visible deterioration of the NHS – think Stephen Dorrell 1995-97. To survive and prosper, he will have to start being honest about how serious NHS understaffing is, stop depicting health professionals as lazy or unprofessional, somehow raise flagging staff morale, get real about delivering a “truly seven-day NHS” with no extra money or bodies, and start to offer hope that an NHS finally freed of austerity may once again be a place of pride, progress and improvement for staff, patients and maybe even politicians.”

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jul/19/jeremy-hunt-survived-cabinet-reshuffle-what-now

The price of nature or the value of nature: Leadsom to decide

“Ministers must deliver on a manifesto pledge for a 25-year plan to boost nature and cut the costs of environmental damage, it has been urged.

Harm caused by floods, air pollution, water pollution and chemicals in the atmosphere are adding billions of pounds a year to bills, insurance premiums and costs for businesses, farms and households, environmentalists warn.

But after the Brexit vote, there is uncertainty whether environmental protections provided by the European Union will be maintained.

And the promised 25-year plan for the environment has been delayed, the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT) said.

Air pollution costs the UK an estimated £15-20bn a year, flood damage £1.4bn, water pollution can add up to 17% on consumer bills, £129m is spent cleaning farm run-off from water supplies and farmers incur an extra £180m in growing costs a year due to chemicals in the air.

But efforts to protect nature would deliver significant economic and social benefits, a report by WWT said.

For example, creating 100,000 hectares of new wetlands from restoring upland peat and coastal salt marshes to creating “pocket ponds” in cities could reduce flooding, purify water, save money and improve mental health.

The report urges the government to deliver on the 25-year plan, and to make itself accountable to parliament by producing an annual budget statement on the value of nature alongside the value of the economy.

Ministers should also ensure UK environmental protection is as strong or stronger after Brexit and appoint “catchment commissioners” to co-ordinate a joined-up approach in each area and reward action across the landscape, it said.

WWT is also calling for ministers to establish guidance and accreditation for organisations providing “green prescriptions” which give access to nature to deliver affordable benefits to physical and mental health.

Opposition parties have backed the call for the government to keep its promise for a 25-year plan for the environment.

They urged ministers to commit to consulting on a plan which sets out strong policies, with long term legally-binding targets to improve the environment, maintains protection after Brexit, and ensures international co-operation on the issue.

In a joint statement, Lib Dem leader Tim Farron, shadow environment secretary Rachael Maskell and Green party MP Caroline Lucas warned “our environment must not be a victim of short-term political unrest”.

WWT chief executive, Martin Spray, said: “We all end up paying for environmental damage through higher prices and taxes, as well as the social and health costs of Britain being a less healthy place to live.

“Our recommendation is remarkably simple. Make the government accountable to parliament for the value of the environment as well as the economy. Transparency will drive improvement.

He added: “This is a key early test for the new prime minister.

“Will she deliver a manifesto commitment to value our environment? And in a post-Brexit Britain she has another question to answer: Will she commit to environmental protection improving on – or at least being equal to – that provided by the EU?”

A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) spokeswoman said: “Developing a 25-year plan for the environment is a Conservative manifesto commitment and a priority for this department.

“While the precise nature of the plan may change now the UK has decided to leave the EU, we will seize this opportunity to consider our long-term vision for the environment and work with a range of interests to determine and deliver it.”

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jul/19/uk-government-must-deliver-on-25-year-environmental-pledge?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Working families largest group of “new poor” not the unemployed or pensioners

“Improving the income of the working poor is the key to reducing inequality, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies.

Its study Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2016, funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, was published today at an event in central London. It highlights some significant changes to the nature of poverty in the UK.

Pensioners’ incomes have risen to the extent that they are now the least likely major demographic group to be in income poverty, after housing costs. Another crucial development is that more people are in work than ever before.

Also, the proportion of children living in a household where no-one works has fallen from nearly one in four in 1994-95 to less than one in six in 2014-15.

Subsequently, the report found the “new poor” tend to be located in houses where there is someone in work. Only one-third of children below the government’s absolute poverty line now live in a workless household. The remainder (two-thirds) of those classed as poor are poor despite the fact that at least one of their parents is in work.

A negative consequence of this change is that poor households are therefore more sensitive to labour market fluctuations than those of the past. It also means that initiatives designed to allay child poverty will be less effective if the focus remains on getting people into work.

For the poorest fifth of households today, income from employment makes up half of total income. Twenty years ago, this figure was under one-third, indicating a greater reliance on benefits and tax credits.

In the report, the IFS stated that if new prime minister Theresa May took the decision to continue the ‘life chances’ strategy started under David Cameron, it should be aimed at raising the economic prospects of working households. …”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/07/poverty-now-resides-within-working-households-says-ifs

Lies, damned lies – and government funding figures

Extract from a report by the government’ select committee on health, chaired by former Totnes GP Sarah Woolaston:

” …Following the conclusion of the committee’s recent inquiry into the spending review, Totnes MP Dr Sarah Wollaston argues Government cuts to public health budget are likely increase costs in the long-term. …

… Last autumn, then chancellor George Osborne announced NHS England would receive an extra £8.4 billion above inflation by 2020/21 to help it cope with growing demand.

However, according to the committee’s findings,this only equates to a real term increase of £4.5 billion of 2015 is used as a base year.

Dr Wollaston acknowledges the NHS “has been treated favourably” compared to many other departments but concludes the increase “is less than was promised if assessed by the usual definitions”. …

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/mp-warns-of-false-economy-in-government-approach-to-health-spending/story-29526995-detail/story.html

Ultra-fast broadband for East Devon?

Well, oddly, first for the Blackdown Hills!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/east-devon-set-for-ultra-fast-broadband-up-to-1-000-mbps/story-29524399-detail/story.html

Exmouth: EDDC backtracks on Moirai Capital Investments – seafront development up for grabs again!

What a surprise! Yet another “we told you so” moment to savour!

“East Devon District Council (EDDC) says that having overcome legal delays, its leaders want to make sure that the development of leisure facilities in Queen’s Drive, between the old lifeboat station and the Maer, is of ‘high quality’, to sit alongside the proposed watersports centre, which the council says is set to progress having been agreed with a developer.

Property developers Moirai Capital Investments were identified as the council’s preferred developers for the main leisure area last year, and EDDC says Moirai made significant efforts to move their proposals forward in difficult circumstances.

EDDC says it has spoken with Moirai, advising it that due to the length of time the process has taken, it’s considering the re-marketing option, and would welcome a further proposal from it as part of this if it does so.

It is more than two years since the main part of the site was originally marketed, and EDDC says the circumstances which influence what happens to Queen’s Drive ‘have changed for the better’.

Councillor Philip Skinner, chairman of East Devon District Council’s Exmouth Regeneration Programme Board, said: “We want Exmouth to be in the best possible position to bring more money and vibrancy to the largest town in Devon. Exmouth has grown continuously for decades, but our seafront leisure facilities haven’t while other seaside resorts have invested and modernised.

“We are considering re-marketing the main Queen’s Drive leisure area to investors and developers who, because of these changing times and our progress on site, now see the potential that Exmouth has to offer.”

Chris Lewis from Moirai Capital said: “We fully appreciate the council’s decision to review this project following the legal delays.

“We remain extremely interested in the potential for the site but understand that time has elapsed and the original concepts will need reviewing. As such we remain committed to the site and will look to rebid as we see Exmouth has the potential for a vibrant and exciting scheme to attract visitors, create jobs and drive forward wet weather facilities for the area.”

The council has outline planning permission to develop the Queen’s Drive site to include a cafe and public open space, retail units, a hotel or holiday accommodation, car parking, and indoor and outdoor play facilities for children and young people of all ages.

This includes the proposed watersports centre at the front of the site, for which the council has forged a partnership with Grenadier Estates.

The council also has approval to realign the road and car park to the rear of the proposed watersports centre once planning permission for the centre is in place.”

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/council_considers_re_marketing_exmouth_seafront_site_1_4622392

Swire: enormously missed by the Maldives

Swire’s Twitter account:

https://mobile.twitter.com/HugoSwire

is full of grateful thanks from many countries for his ministrations at the Foreign Office.

By far the most coming from the Maldives, which appears desolate at its loss, not salved by already having a new UK government representative in place, probably Sir Alan Duncan, MP who took Swire’s place.

Still, that country has about 350,000 inhabitants whereas East Devon has only about 136,000 so taking care of East Devon should be much easier and much less commuting time from Mid-Devon.

Was the new wine and candles photo at the top of the Twitter account taken during one of his visits to the Maldives, perhaps? It looks much too exotic to be Sidmouth – though climate change may well see Sidmouth transformed into a tropical climate quite soon!

EDDC: cost of officer time – selective monitoring and double standards for the Standards Committee

Isn’t it interesting that, in just about every area of EDDC’s work, the cost of officer time is not included. Take the Knowle relocation – officer time is NEVER costed. Take planning applications and the production of the Local Plan – officer time is NEVER costed.

Yet, when it comes to monitoring the behaviour of councillors, somehow officer time can be costed. Why? Because EDDC wants to subtly suggest that it costs an awful lot of money and really people should not be wasting their precious time as most complaints are dismissed by the Monitoring Officer anyway!

“The annual cost for assessing Monitoring Officer type complaints remains at approximately £40,000, which has been calculated based on an estimate of officers’ time spent assessing, investigating and administering complaints as part of their job role. Officers dealing with the Code of Conduct complaints process are:
Monitoring Officer; Deputy Monitoring Officer, PA to Monitoring Officer, Democratic Services Officer, statutory Independent Person role (of which EDDC has used two on an alternate basis) and Investigating Officer when required.”

Click to access 190716standardscttecombinedagenda.pdf

Has Hugo Swire semi-retired now he is a backbench MP?

This was the photograph that used to grace his Twitter account when he was a Foreign Office Minister:

hugo1

and this is the photograph that he replaced it with when he was sacked from his ministerial job:

Hugo2

From ministerial leather armchair to wine and candles somewhere that just doesn’t look at all like East Devon – what a difference a day makes!

Though, perhaps, when the carnival is really over, THIS might be the reality:

Claire Wright and MP Hugo Swire with protesters at Ottery St Mary hospital on Saturday Ref sho 21-16SH 4964. Picture: Simon Horn.

Claire Wright and MP Hugo Swire with protesters at Ottery St Mary hospital on Saturday Ref sho 21-16SH 4964. Picture: Simon Horn.

Advice for the new Communities Minister on Devolution

So many instututions are now seeing what is wrong with devolution deals – but does the newly-constituted government care? Does it have the time or the will to care? Great words on inequality and a government that failed to understand ordinary people from Mrs May but will actions follow?

But the final sentence below on “networks and influence” is chilling, and just about negates the rest of the advice and may be pointing another, more worrying, way.

” … Grasp the democratic opportunity of devolution. With mayoral elections due next spring in the devolution deal areas, a more devolved system of governance will soon have new faces and voices, which will contribute to a shift in the political centre of gravity away from Westminster.

Yet democratic engagement through devolution should not begin and end with mayors. The speed of the process has created little space for democratic innovation to accompany reform, but there is an opportunity now for a richer democratic discussion, already being led by councillors, to take place. The next phase should be much more directly shaped by local people who need to feel more connected to the tangible opportunities reform can bring – open policymaking, citizens juries and using digital tools to reach people in new ways.

Above all, the new secretary of state shouldn’t think of devolution as giving power away, but as enhancing his own ability to get results. We live in an age that respects networks, not hierarchies. Some of the shocks convulsing through the institutions of Westminster and Brussels are the effects of this. The traditional clunking levers of Whitehall machinery struggle for impact in a complex, interdependent world. So use devolution as an opportunity to create a different model of governance – where influence and relationships are prime.

We look forward to seeing where Javid takes devolution next.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/opinion/2016/07/five-priorities-new-communities-and-local-government-secretary

EDDC: “OAP’s battle over safety alarm bill”

Seems EDDC only likes competitive pricing when it suits them!

“The 78-year-old, who does not want to be identified, is campaigning against district council sheltered accommodation tenants being forced to pay up to £30 a month for unwanted home alarm and safety systems, writes Becca Gliddon.

The pensioner’s daughter said OAPs were being ‘bullied’ into paying for an unwelcome medical and support system.

She said the family had been fighting the council for a year to abolish the charge and compulsory service; her mum says she had been originally told the service was free.

The family’s fight echoes a Budleigh Salterton pensioner’s plea, recently shot down by East Devon District Council (EDDC), when the 91-year-old asked to source a cheaper, private option.

The Budleigh woman said the £676 annual council charge would force her to choose the unwanted alarm over heating her home.

The Exmouth grandmother says other sheltered accommodation tenants want the Home Safeguard Services scheme scrapped, but are too afraid to speak out for fear of reprisals by the council.

So she is fighting to choose her own home safety and alarm service.

She claims cheaper options are available.

EDDC said the alarm service and support system was an ‘integral part’ of its sheltered housing offer. It said it was ‘determined’ to keep it running.

The council said it had a hardship fund for people unable to pay, warned it would ‘seek possession’ as a ‘last resort’ for non-payment and would discuss other options available with tenants who thought the service unnecessary – including ‘helping tenants find more suitable accommodation’, adding sheltered housing was for ‘residents who are in need of our support services’.

The Exmouth pensioner, who has a personal SOS phone system linked to her daughter in Exmouth, said: “It should be possible to for me to be given the opportunity to supply my own service and protection. I feel I could do it at a fraction of the cost.”

http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/oap_s_battle_over_safety_alarm_bill_1_4619222

Brexit: where now for Devon and Cornwall businesses?

Devon and Cornwall Business Council:

“1) DEVOLUTION. This process may be very welcome to the business community (or it may not). There has been inadequate consultation for us to know what the implications might be. Either way it will create a period of uncertainty. We cannot afford to risk this whilst so many critical matters are up in the air. I propose that we ask for, at least, a 12 month moratorium whilst clarity is restored. Then we need a proper period of consultation knowing what we then know. Devolution has the potential to provide significant opportunities for devolved administrations to determine their own future when it comes to skills, transport, investment and development, but this agenda needs to be developed collaboratively with the private sector standing shoulder to shoulder with Government.

2) EUROPEAN MARKETS. More than 50% of South West trade is with near Europe. There have been some bold statements that 90% of trading opportunities will be outside the EU in the next 10-15 years. Many, however, of our investors are based in Europe – IMERYS, EDF Energy, Sibelco, Princes Yachts, Plymouth Gin, Barden Corporation to name but a few. Decisions are made in European capitals which affect a large number of our jobs and future growth prospects. We need to ensure that the existing investments are maintained and that we will feature in future investment decisions – access to the Single Market is vital. UK Trade and Industry (UKTI) department officials are already fully stretched (inadequate funding currently, with an increasing workload), we need to establish our own business trade ambassadors to ensure direct contacts are maintained and developed. From this base we can then begin to start creating a forward order book for whatever new trade agreements might emerge. This will also allow a programme to be developed to enable access into new global markets.

3) INFRASTRUCTURE. The South West has for too long been the Cinderella of the UK in terms of infrastructure investment. We have clearly supported plans for future spending on road, rail, air, marine and broadband projects. We must now directly lobby for these, acting as a single voice and ensuring that our South West MPs are lobbied to also speak with one voice. What, however, will make this happen is a demonstration that investment in infrastructure will result in direct business investment. We need to clearly demonstrate what we will contribute in return.

4) PLAY TO OUR STRENGTHS. Some of our most successful business sectors should be the subject of focussed programmes for ambitious expansion – food and drink, tourism and e-health are good examples of where the South West has specialist skills. Add to these; marine / maritime technology, aerospace / space, advanced engineering, digital and creative economy. Designed and co-ordinated tasks forces could achieve spectacular results in these areas of the economy.

5) GOVERNANCE/REGULATION. The system of regulation has been often complained about as a barrier to business growth – red tape, EU regulations or Gold plating from Whitehall? Staffing levels at regulators have been cut making the problems more acute. The establishment of voluntary codes and working partnerships led by trade bodies and self-regulated by them (with rewards for best practise) could greatly improve the current confrontational systems which have become entrenched – particularly in areas such as planning and environmental health.

6) PRODUCTIVITY. We have routinely lagged behind the average UK productivity levels (between 15-20% lower than UK average for Devon and Cornwall1). There are many drivers of productivity; investment, innovation, skills, enterprise and competition. This problem can be partly addressed by self-help. Simple work based systems can achieve significant improvements to outputs (and profits). These include Lean Production techniques. Training for all staff on digital skills and improvements to work/life balance (flexible working hours) which can reduce lost time off through stress / illness.

7) YOUNG BUSINESS. The Business Community has a collective responsibility to re-engage with the next generation to ensure we have attracted the huge talents of our young people. Business support can start by involvement as a Governor at Primary School all the way through to being a voluntary mentor for new start businesses. There are also great opportunities for assisting with work experience. The SW is blessed with some exceptional people with invaluable skills and experience. This should be high on the business agenda.

8) INNOVATION/SKILLS. We are proud of our Universities and Further Education Colleges. They deliver with national and international standards. The ground breaking research they produce is helping to change things around the world. We complain about a lack of relevant skills; however, do we fully engage with these institutions? Do we share with them our future business plans so that skill sets can be anticipated? Do we share with them our challenges in order to co-develop innovative solutions? Do we respond to their outreach work which can tackle production/system deficiencies? The answer is we could all do better. New partnerships should be formed as a priority. In part focusing on achieving young people with relevant skills (matched to growth sectors) through apprenticeships which, have the potential to greatly reduce our reliability on skilled labour from outside the UK, EU or otherwise.

9) URBAN/RURAL. For too long we have allowed ourselves to get sucked into Whitehall speak on the growth of Cities. Seen from the Whitehall bubble this is the best place to concentrate investment decisions. What we are missing by not forging strong urban/rural partnerships represents one of the greatest untapped opportunities for the growth of our economy – natural energy, local food production, health and well-being, water quality, flood/climate change management are all on our doorstep. DCBC will spearhead a rolling programme of partnership opportunities.

10) FUNDNG. The expectation that Government cash will still arrive as before is fool’s gold. Austerity will get worse before it gets better. Business will become even more important in the funding of growth opportunities. This could include matched funding with Devolved Authorities and perhaps taking advantage of cheap Government borrowing. We must set out our investment priorities more clearly and take these to our key stakeholders in the public sector for early discussions in order that improved delivery be achieved.”

http://www.dcbc.co.uk/news/brexit-where-next-business-community-10-point-recovery-plan#

Back bench – influence or toe the party line?

A correspondent below has raised the question as to why, if Swire as a commom-or-garden back bench MP would be ineffective, should an Independent MP not be just as ineffective.

Good question.

It is Swire himself who told us that he was MORE effective on our behalf as a Minister as, though he maintained that he could not speak for us in Parliament, as a Minister he said had direct access to other Ministers instead. The mover and shaker could easily have quiet words with other movers and shakers.

And now he has one major difference compared to an independent MP – having to follow the Whip of someone in his party who sacked him and whose leadership, it appears from his tweet, does not inspire him. HE sees it as relegation (albeit with his mates).

Not the case for Independents – free to speak, free to act, as they say.

He could, of course, become an Independent and free himself from his shackles!

Swire: jumped or pushed? Depends on your source!

Swire’s Twitter account gives the impression he jumped (see post below) but Daily Mail (so it MUST be true!) says he was pushed:

The Prime Minister continued her ‘posh boy purge’ by removing Old Etonian Hugo Swire as a Foreign Office Minister. He responded by tweeting a cartoon image of Bugs Bunny saying: ‘That’s all, folks.’

Mr Swire lost his job shortly after using Twitter to liken sacked allies of David Cameron to condemned prisoners sent to the guillotine during the French Revolution.

He said: ‘Not a good time to be a Cameroon. The tumbrils are rolling again!’
Mrs May also sacked public-school educated Ed Vaizey, who was Arts Minister”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3693766/Brutal-sacks-Gove-ally-New-Prime-Minister-s-ruthless-reshuffle-continues-Dominic-Raab-loses-Justice-Minister-role.html

Swire was very briefly Private Parliamentary Secretary to Theresa May when she was Conservative Party Chairman in 2003. Perhaps it was an experience one or both of them did not want to repeat.

Everything changes, nothing changes

“New International Trade Secretary Liam Fox celebrated his government comeback at a Commons champagne party attended by the friend and former associate linked to his previous Cabinet downfall.

Dr Fox and Adam Werritty were among a noisy group who downed eight bottles of bubbly on the Commons terrace, with at least one cork being popped into the River Thames. The event took place within an hour of Dr Fox, 54, being given a key Brexit role in Theresa May’s new Cabinet. His friends queued up to give him congratulatory slaps on the back as he drank £29-a-bottle House of Commons champagne.

The impromptu party, hosted by Commons Deputy Speaker and fellow Tory MP Eleanor Laing, a longstanding friend of Dr Fox and his wife Jesme, was attended by about 20 people. They got through eight bottles over a couple of hours. Mrs Fox was not present.

Dr Fox was forced to resign as Defence Secretary in October 2011 in a row over his dealings with Mr Werritty. The lobbyist did not have security clearance but accompanied Dr Fox on at least 18 foreign business trips.

The resignation came after a week of revelations about Dr Fox’s relationship with Werritty, including disclosures that the friend’s activities were funded by firms and individuals that potentially stood to benefit from government decisions.

At the time, Werritty falsely described himself as one of Dr Fox’s official aides and handed out business cards bearing the Commons portcullis logo. He also took a number of solo trips reportedly with the aim of fostering closer ties between Right-wing politicians in Britain and the United States.

In his resignation letter to the then Prime Minister David Cameron, Dr Fox said he had ‘mistakenly allowed the distinction between my personal interest and my Government activities to become blurred’.

Mr Werritty, 37, best man at Dr Fox’s 2005 wedding, moved into Dr Fox’s spare room in London after graduating from university. Werritty now lives in a flat in Dolphin Square, Pimlico – a mile from the Commons – where many MPs have apartments.

An inquiry cleared Dr Fox of benefiting financially from his links with Werritty.

An MP who saw Dr Fox’s champagne party said: ‘It seemed a bit over the top to celebrate so loudly in full view of members of the public on Westminster Bridge.’

Dr Fox said last night: ‘Adam and his wife were invited by Eleanor.’ He added: ‘My friends are my friends and I’m very loyal to them.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3693749/Fox-celebrates-bubbly-old-pal-New-Trade-Secretary-attends-party-ex-associate-linked-previous-downfall.html

Swire: jumping before being pushed? Hello constituency MP!

So, farewell Hugo Swire, Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, hello Hugo Swire, common-or-garden backbench MP. It should be noted that, since becoming an MP, Swire has spent most of his time in some government post or other and has never really experienced life as a back bench MP with little or no power or influence.

No excuses now for not speaking up on behalf of East Devon! And SO much less international work for his £35,000+ per annum P.A (his wife Sasha). True, it will mean commuting from his home in Mid-Devon but at least that will still be on expenses.

Hugo Swire said he was retiring from his role as a foreign minister hours after likening sacked allies of David Cameron to condemned prisoners sent to the guillotine during the French revolution.

He tweeted yesterday: “Not a good time to be a Cameroon. The tumbrils are rolling again!”

Tumbrils were carts used to carry prisoners to the guillotine during the revolution.

On Saturday, he tweeted a photo of the famous Looney Tunes cartoon sign-off “that’s all folks!” and said: “I am retiring to the backbenches to join my friends. It’s been an honour and a privilege to have served as a minister in the government since 2010.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/15/more-heads-roll-in-next-round-of-theresa-may-ruthless-reshuffle

Aren’t we lucky …

East Devon street trading consultation

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/east-devon-street-trader-consultation-deadline-looming/story-29519491-detail/story.html

What you need to know:

The more street traders, the more income for East Devon.

Charge council tax on unbuilt homes says Lords Committee

“The [House of Lords] Economic Affairs Committee in its report “Building more homes” has strongly recommended that the Government must lift its target by 50% and build 300,000 homes each year to tackle the housing crisis. It also suggests that Local authorities and housing associations must be freed to build substantial numbers of homes for rent and for sale.

Key findings

In their report, “Building more homes”, published today, the cross-party House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee criticises the Government’s housing policy for:

Setting a new homes target which will fail to meet the demand for new homes or moderate the rate of house price increases.

Restricting local authorities’ access to funding to build more social housing.

Creating uncertainty in the already dysfunctional housing market by frequent changes to tax rules and subsidies for house purchases, reductions in social rents, and the extension of the Right to Buy. All of these changes reduce the supply of homes for those who need low cost rental accommodation.
A narrow focus on home ownership which neglects those who rent their home.

Conclusions

The Committee makes wide-ranging recommendations to address the housing crisis, including:

Restraints on local authority borrowing should be lifted. Local authorities should be free to borrow to fund social housebuilding as they are other building programmes. This would enable local authorities to resume their historic role as one of the major builders of new homes, particularly social housing.

The current historically low cost of borrowing means local authorities could make a large contribution to building the houses we need for the future. Further, the new Prime Minister has announced that the Government will abandon their fiscal target. This paves the way to increase local authority borrowing powers.

Council tax should be charged on development that is not completed quickly. The Government’s reliance on private developers to meet its target of new homes is misguided. The private sector housebuilding market is oligopolistic with the eight largest builders building 50% of new homes. Their business model is to restrict the volume of housebuilding to maximise their profit margin. To address this the Committee recommend that local authorities are granted the power to levy council tax on developments that are not completed within a set time period.

Maximise the use of public land. The Government must take decisive steps to build on the very substantial holdings of surplus publicly owned land. The Committee recommends that a senior Cabinet minister must be given overall responsibility for identifying and coordinating the release of public land for housing, with a particular focus on providing low cost homes. The National Infrastructure Commission should oversee this process.

Local authorities should be given the power to increase planning fees. Local authorities should be able to set and vary planning fees to help fund a more efficient planning system and the upper cap on these charges should be much higher than the current limit. …”

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ldeconaf/20/20.pdf