Implicit admission that LEP is mothballed and its Single Economic Plan was not effective and new consultation needed

QUESTION FROM COUNCILLOR VINT
Re: HOTSW and Economic Development Consultation

When drafting the economic development elements of the Heart Of The South West Devolution Prospectus how were the primary employment, housing and social needs of the region identified, and how were residents and small businesses consulted to help identify these needs?”

REPLY BY COUNCILLOR HART

“On the 19th September 2016, I gave a presentation at a Member Development Session on Devolution which is available on the Councils website at

Devolution

The presentation is clear in setting out the next steps for the partnership.

In respect of further engagement with key stakeholders in the development of our joint economic priorities; this will be undertaken through the development of a Productivity Plan. This plan will replace the current Single Economic Plan developed by the Local Enterprise Partnership and is an opportunity for all local authority partners and stakeholders to fully engage in developing proposals that will deliver greater prosperity across the Heart of the South West.

The Partnership is starting work on this in Autumn and will be engaging with groups through to Spring. Members will have the opportunity to consider the draft Productivity Plan before final approval.”

This presentation also set out a timetable for formal public and stakeholder consultation starting in the early New Year on the creation of a Combined Authority and a draft deal with Government.

At this meeting I did, however, emphasise that this timetable is subject to Government formally engaging with the Partnership.

I can confirm that the Partnership is not actively engaged in formal negotiations with Government and therefore this timeline will be amended.

The Partnership is clear that it will only go to formal public consultation when it has an offer from Government for the public and stakeholders to consider. I will, of course, continue to keep Members updated on progress with Devolution.

http://democracy.devon.gov.uk/mgConvert2PDF

“Care crisis sees 1,500 homes shut in six years’

Almost 1,500 care homes have closed in the last six years, figures from the health watchdog revealed yesterday.
Experts say the closures are having a devastating impact on the lives of vulnerable elderly patients.

Many are being kept in hospital unnecessarily, becoming ‘bed blockers’, because there is no room in nearby homes.

The Care Quality Commission said it is extremely concerned about the ‘pace’ of closures – which is driven by a crisis in funding – and warned it could ‘undermine the quality and safety of care that people receive’.

Tomorrow it will publish a damning report that is likely to show that hundreds of the remaining homes are putting patients at risk.

Figures obtained from the CQC by BBC News show there are now 16,614 care homes and nursing homes in England – down from 18,068 in September 2010.

The closures are being fuelled by Government cuts to councils’ social care budgets.

Councils are not paying care home providers enough to keep up with the costs of looking after vulnerable residents.
This means it is not profitable for providers to keep so many homes open, so they shut those that are running at a loss.

But the closures are happening just as demand is steadily increasing due to our ageing population.

Figures obtained from the CQC by BBC News show there are now 16,614 care homes and nursing homes in England – down from 18,068 in September 2010. And the lack of available spaces is leading to rising numbers of the elderly being kept in hospital.

This has a devastating impact on their health and means there is a lack of beds for patients coming in from A&E.
CQC’s chief inspector of adult social care, Angela Sutcliffe, said: ‘It does highlight a concern that the long-term sustainability of high-quality care within this sector could be at risk …

‘We know that the adult social care sector faces many financial pressures, which worryingly could undermine the quality and safety of care that people receive and rely upon every day.’

Tomorrow the CQC will publish its annual report on the standards of care at England’s thousands of care homes, hospitals and GPs surgeries.

Last year it rated a third of the 17,000 residential and nursing homes as either ‘inadequate’ or ‘requires improvement.’

Experts are also worried about a repeat of the collapse of the Southern Cross healthcare group in 2011, which left 30,000 elderly residents having to be urgently relocated.
The provider was forced to close all of its 750 care homes because it could no longer afford the rent.

In a further blow, many providers are cutting back on council-funded home care visits because they aren’t profitable.

This means vulnerable residents who rely on such visits to help them wash and dress are suddenly having them stopped.
Last night Professor Martin Green, chief executive of Care England, which represents care homes, said the Government needed to take ‘urgent action’ to provide councils with more funding.

‘We have been warning about these problems for some time. There is a lot of churn in the sector – contracts changing hands as providers leave and services stopping,’ he said.
‘There is simply not enough money in the system.’ Caroline Abrahams, of charity Age UK, added: ‘Few public services are as important as social care, and yet it is clearly in serious, progressive decline.’

A Department of Health spokesman admitted the current market was ‘challenging.’ But they said ministers were taking steps to help through the creation of a new pot of money called the Better Care Fund.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3833463/Care-crisis-sees-1-500-homes-shut-six-years-Closures-having-devastating-effect-lives-elderly-patients-leading-bed-blocking-hospitals.html

A tale of two AONBs

A gas-fired power station has been proposed for the East Devon village of Hawkchurch on the East Devon- West Dorset border NEAR an AONB (Area of outstanding Natural Beauty) in Dorset. It was not put out to consultation to the local community.

West Dorset MP Oliver Letwin says of it:

This development will have an impact on the West Dorset AONB.

“I do not believe it is appropriate, or in line with national planning policy, for industrial installations to be located in ways that have such impact on landscape of national importance. I hope, therefore, that this application will be refused.”

Councillor tries to extend consultation period on ‘power station’

In East Devon, an industrial site is being planned WITHIN the AONB at Sidford – after it had been agreed that it would not be allowed in the Local Plan but slipped in because officers did not offer up evidence to a Planning Inspector to remove it.

The local MP, Hugo Swire, has said …

… absolutely nothing at all.

Neil Parish knows exactly how to drum up post-Brexit trade!

Question in Parliament yesterday:

Does my hon. Friend agree that what is different about having a new royal yacht now is that we are sailing into a brave new world, and that we will do, and need to do, many more trade deals across the world? There is a great opportunity not only to support the royal family, but to support the nation in getting those trade deals

His other parliamentary questions in 2016 have covered. Bear in mind he is a dairy farmer and Chairman of the Commons Transport Committee.

Summary: good to have onside if you are a farmer or use the A303 a lot. Not so good if you are an ordinary voter desperately trying to get on the housing ladder or a struggling seaside town in his area (Seaton is in his constituency) or a pensioner worried about your current or future health!

To be fair: he did speak up at the Feniton development public inquiry – but his written questions fo reflect his major interests:

Questions 2016

The Swansea tidal lagoon – two questions this year
Olympics and doping
Hybrid cars
Veal
Congratulations to Ministers
Broadband – several questions
EU sanctions on Russia
Bsdger Culling
Milk prices
Dualling A303/ West Country roads – many questions.
Eating Well
The dairy industry
Universal Credits
Working with industry instead of bringing in a sugar tax
Stimulating venture capital investment
Farming in general – many similar questions
Police grants
Renewable heat
Onshore gas and shale extraction
Flooding ( after Somerset floods)
Biofuels
Rural areas

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?pid=24779&pop=1&p=5

How to kill a town

This is about Totnes, but could be any town, anywhere:

“There are three easy ways to destroy a town.

First – relax the planning laws so that developers can build what they want, where they want.

Two – build huge amounts of houses all at once, all over the fields surrounding the town; infill any green space inside; make sure the houses obscure everyone else; make sure they are all unaffordable to local people, but attractive to second home owners and buy to let investors; make sure you don’t provide any new infrastructure, no new schools, hospital places, improvements to roads, to sewers; make sure that local industries; the marina, the last dairy farm are closed down and covered in new, ugly boxes with no gardens and in regimented rows.

[Three] You’re nearly there now! Make sure that the roads are so congested with new cars that traffic can’t move and then for your final flourish, sell off its most treasured, vital area, in the case of Totnes, the market and the garden and the central car parks without which a town such as Totnes cannot function.

Wonderful, you’re there. You have successfully choked an ancient and very special place to death; you look at the million pound houses replacing the marina and it looks good; you look at the tacky tacky boxes spreading out over the hillside along the river and you smile to yourself, who needs farmers, they’re mucky – we can buy all we need from the huge industrial intensive farming block in Hampshire. Who needs a market?

The Black Prince may well have given this ancient town a charter, but that was such a long time ago, who needs history? Who needs tourism, there must be other jobs these people can do, well it doesn’t really matter, once we’ve got the locals out and replaced them almost entirely with second home owners, then we won’t be bothered with their complaints – black windows all winter are a bonus.

Look at Salcombe, 70% second homes and no trouble at all. All those ridiculous transition people with their big ideas and their trying to live responsibly, there’s no money to be made in that, what’s the matter with them.

No, lets make sure we do to Totnes what we have done so successfully in the past to Torbay and towns like Newton Abbot, there’s nothing quite so satisfying as ripping the heart out of a marvellous old place and replacing that heart with concrete…”

https://allengeorgina.wordpress.com/2016/10/12/how-to-kill-a-town-a-how-to-guide/

Ben Bradshaw MP on health cuts in Devon

From Ben Bradshaw, Exeter MP, column in Express and Echo. Owl wonders how many other local MPs will take credit for a government minister visit to the area!

“I’m pleased that a Government Health Minister agreed to my request in Parliament on Tuesday to meet local patients and NHS staff during a forthcoming visit to Devon to discuss concerns about controversial changes being proposed to services.

Among these is the loss of a significant number of local community hospital beds, including, possibly, the only community beds in Exeter, at Whipton Hospital.

This is just the first tranche of a wide-ranging set of proposals we’re expecting from Devon NHS managers who are grappling with a record financial deficit.

There can be good arguments for changing services, especially the better integration of health and social care and for shifting resources from beds and buildings to provide better support for people in their homes. But with the NHS already suffering its worst financial crisis ever and social care cut to the bone, we will take some convincing that these plans are genuinely about improving services and not just about filling a financial black hole of the Government’s making.

The House of Commons Health Select Committee, on which I sit, has told the Government repeatedly that current funding levels for the NHS and Social Care are not sustainable. We heard from NHS leaders this week that without significant extra resources the NHS will have to introduce widespread rationing, cuts in services and/or extend charging. So far, the Government appears completely oblivious to the seriousness of the situation.”

bhttp://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/ben-bradshaw-on-syria-nhs-funding-and-hard-brexit/story-29801464-detail/story.html

“Tourist boost for Cornwall – but Devon could lose out”

Our only tourism vehicle at the moment is our Local Enterprise Partnership – which has a small amount of spin and rhetoric about tourism in its ” vision”but no actual plans or extra funding. Basically, tourism is left to the small and medium businesses that barely feature in their plans. Despite tourism having higher growth than any other sector they deal with.

Basically, if there isn’t a nuclear option, they don’t want to know. Tourism will no doubt be on the cards for Hinkley C though!


“Devon risks being sidelined from a lavish Government-backed advertising campaign to get Britons to holiday at home.

Domestic tourism board VisitEngland has been allocated almost £20 million through the Regional Growth Fund, the Government’s flagship plan to get economies outside of London motoring.

The tourist body for Cornwall, VisitCornwall, is among 14 partner organisations that will soak up much of the cash on promoting “staycations” via national media. But VisitDevon is currently not one of them.

The campaign is looking to capitalise on the feel-good factor surrounding the London Olympics and the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee next year.

Tourism leaders say the Government is right to invest in the industry as it helps meet the aims of boosting sectors beyond the City of London and reviving areas facing public sector job cuts.

Estimates say if the 13 per cent increase in domestic tourism is maintained until the end of the year it would mean an increase of £2.7 billion for the UK economy – enough to create more than 50,000 jobs spread across the whole of the UK.

The £20 million will be used on a three-year project entitled Growing Tourism Locally.

James Berresford, chief executive of VisitEngland, said: “With this additional money we can mount a serious campaign to stimulate domestic tourism that has the potential to create the equivalent of 9,500 full time jobs in areas across the country suffering economic challenges.”
He said tourism board “partners” will manage parts of the campaign. They represent Bath, Birmingham, Bristol, Cumbria, Durham, Kent, Manchester, Merseyside, Newcastle-Gateshead, Northumberland, Nottinghamshire, Peak District and Derbyshire, and York. Each body is thought to have secured match-funding from the private sector.

VisitEngland, which will buy television, newspaper and Internet space, is yet to decide the size of the slice of the cash each area will get. A series of thematic campaigns focusing on countryside, heritage, coastal and business tourism will run alongside.

Malcolm Bell, head of VisitCornwall, said beaches, coastlines and other “icons of Cornwall” would be deployed as “best products in the shop window” to sell England.
He added: “If you take the coastal theme, you would say isn’t it wonderful to have a seaside holiday in the UK – the product to sell that will be Cornwall. People understand it. This is a good use of public money because marketing works.”
VisitDevon was unable to comment yesterday, but VisitEngland said it could feature in the thematic advertising.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/tourist-boost-cornwall-ndash-devon-lose/story-13731942-detail/story.html

Take control …

“Take control” are two of the most potent words in our language that have come to mean just one thing in the weeks since the Brexit vote.

But the desire for more control over our lives is not the exclusive preserve of Leave voters – and nor can it or should it be confined to the issue of immigration.

Our polling shows that people from all backgrounds and with every kind of belief now feel they have lost control over what matters most to them, whether it is the price of a home, the pace of technological change or the poisoning of our planet.

Far from being supporters of the status quo, a clear majority of remain supporters specifically identify big business and corporate elites as having “too much power over their lives”.

By an even bigger margin of 62%, those who voted remain in the referendum say that only a few people in power take all the big decisions, adding that there is not much the average citizen can do about it.

Those decisions now seem further out of reach than ever for millions of people after the party conference season. The government has confirmed its determination to pursue a hard Brexit, even though that risks making matters worse for people who already feel left behind in this economy.

At the same time, many people see opposition parties as being in disarray and deeply divided, leaving some to despair at the prospects for progressive politics ever providing answers, let alone getting the chance to put them into practice.

A storm in our economy and our democracy that has been gathering for decades is now firmly upon us. A torrent of wealth of power is washing away even the fragile footholds people had established in the economy. Many more now face losing control all together in the face of global, technological and climate change.

Yet, even in the midst of all this upheaval, a surge of energy is being generated that can crack open new possibilities for people to take more control right now – not at some distant point in the future.

The New Economics Foundation seeks to give people the tools to take control and change their lives for the better
Today, the New Economics Foundation is setting out ways to shift debate beyond secret negotiations over Brexit in the capitals of Europe, seemingly endless party infighting in Westminster’s opposition, or literal fights in Brussels over whose turn it is next to lead Ukip.

Instead, we are setting out an agenda for people to take control themselves, without having to wait for government to do it for – or to – them.

Our agenda for people draws on real experiences, ranging from those in seaside communities who feel abandoned by the political elite, taxi drivers in London trying to make a living in an Uber-ised economy, small businesses starved of finance, consumers overcharged for energy, and young families hoping for their first home or worried about the cost of childcare.

It seeks to give all of them the tools they need to take control and change their lives for the better. Coastal communities will find ways to revive a clean marine economy which brings together people who care about the environment with those who care about getting decent jobs. We are helping to develop a new taxi app owned and controlled by drivers themselves, from London to Leeds, to give them the chance to share in the vast new digital value being created around us.

The foundation is also drawing up plans to turn the scandal-torn RBS into 130 stakeholder banks that serve local firms rather than expecting them to serve it. We have teamed up with the Switched On London campaign to help communities generate renewable and affordable energy that gives them a real stake in a low-carbon future.

Furthermore, in a project with Citizens UK, we are creating the first maps of vacant public land available for the houses that need to get built. And we are helping parents expand the number of childcare co-operatives so they can not only afford a service fundamental to modern working lives, but also exercise more control over it.

This is not an agenda merely for clicktivists who think change happens on a smartphone screen on the way to a rally. We recognise that the tools people need to take control must be fashioned in partnership with institutions wielding real power, ranging from devolved government, city mayors and forward-looking businesses to trade union and community-led campaigns across the country.

But this is the first time a major thinktank has set itself a bigger ambition than merely influencing ministers or future legislation, or getting included in a political party’s manifesto.

The New Economics Foundation will focus on helping people and communities take control by engaging with new partners – from the Mayor of London and Google DeepMind to the GMB and Citizens UK – to explore new possibilities for change right now.

We are rooted outside the traditional boundaries of politics. We care most about people’s everyday experience. And we will work with communities of all kinds to give them the tools they need to build a better future because there has never been a more urgent need for a new economy than right now.”

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/11/politicians-housing-employment-childcare-control-new-economics-foundation