Louise MacAllister, Spokesperson, Save Exmouth Seafront gives her view on the contest. Owl will be happy to publish Councillor Skinner’s riposte if received:
- SES’s core aim is for independent public consultation before any further work goes ahead on the seafront.
- EDDC’s consultations have been inadequate.
- Cllr Megan Armstrong’s survey that SES supported showed that a majority do not want to see wholesale development on the seafront.
- EDDC’s incompetence around the project has led to the seafront becoming derelict.
- The spiralling costs of the project further demonstrate the incompetence of the Exmouth Regeneration Board.
- That the Regeneration Board meet in secret only increases frustration and as such Ms MacAllister has been trying to arrange a Q&A session with Cllr Skinner, the chair of the Exmouth Regeneration Board.
- Cllr Skinner gatecrashed a SES meeting, this is not public engagement.
Cllr Skinner, Chair, Exmouth Regeneration Board:
- It is a three-phase development, it’s very exciting, we should be excited!
- Phase three is ‘open for consultation’ we may even have a hotel?!
- Existing tenants are blamed for delays.
- It is REALLY, REALLY EXCITING!
- Skinner thinks they have consulted extensively but – he doesn’t know the numbers.
- This is a SERIOUS investment (thank god it’s not a joke investment!).
- Correction – the ‘recent consultation’ with over 1000 participants that Howard Witts mentioned is in fact the seafront survey undertaken by independent Cllr Megan Armstrong, and which the regeneration board have resolutely ignored.
- [Seems Skinner finds it amusing that the regeneration board meets in secret as he can be heard laughing while Howard is asking him about this].
- The Premier Inn and Ocean are apparently architecturally superior and successful, ‘raising the bar in architecture’.
- Everything Skinner claims about his gatecrashing of an SES meeting is untrue, he was unwelcome and people made it clear he was unwelcome. Unfortunately the meeting was not chaired well and so he was enabled to carry on despite this. He was certainly not thanked or clapped as he claims in the interview.
- The post-march SES meeting was not an open public meeting nor was it advertised as such, it was advertised as a meeting for SES supporters.
- Cllr Skinner does not think it is Ms MacAllister’s responsibility as SES spokesperson to say that he should hold an open public meeting. SHE AGREES! It is HIS responsibility and he alone should be held accountable for his lack of public engagement she says. As someone who represents a group seeking transparency and openness she will continue to press for this even though it is not her responsibility.