Below is information from an Exmouth resident sent to an Archant local reporter regarding development at Littleham, Exmouth, the “red dust” it is creating and its effect on a large number of frustrated residents.
The resident has received no reply to either email and the newspaper has not balanced its original mild article to reflect the information in these emails:
“11 August 2018:
Ms Brainwood [Archant reporter who wrote original article]:
Further to my email from last week I write to inform you of the following. It has been noted by the way that you did not pay me the courtesy of a reply.
Local residents are quite rightly annoyed that your article gave false impressions.
You reported the following :
1. The only residents to be affected were two elderly people in Buckingham Close.
2. The only area affected was indeed Buckingham Close.
3. Taylor Wimpey were doing everything they could to minimise the red dust site vehicles generated.
4. EDDC were happy that the red dust was “ within limits “.
5. Environmental Health Officers from EDDC were quite happy with the overall situation.
The real situation could not be further from the truth.
If you had asked local residents they would have informed you the red dust was experienced in Littleham Road, Midway, The Crescent, Jarvis Close, The Broadway, Douglas Road and Cranford Road just to name a few areas.
Local resident who I have spoken to agree your article is at best sloppy journalism and at worst, fake news.
I read on the Exmouth Journal website your Group Editor Philip Griffin tells us the paper is “ respected for it`s balanced reporting “. We all had a good laugh at that.
For you information the cycle path in Jarvis Close north of Plumb Park is being currently dug up by South West Water to lay pipes. The work will last for 5 weeks. More excessive noise, more disruption and even more dust just a couple of metres from residences in Littleham Road.
Finally, it is your prerogative not to reply to my emails, it is our prerogative not to purchase your paper. “
and the resident’s earlier email to which the resident also had no reply:
“2 August 2018
Subject: Red dust causes misery for residents near Plumb Park development
I would like to make you aware of a few facts regarding the current red dust problem that you reported on in the 1st August 2018 edition of the Exmouth Journal.
“ Taylor Wimpey have taken measures to reduce the impact “. This is not correct.
When I have contacted their Exeter call centre ( 01392 442617 ) they say dust suppression is taking place, but it is not. We are told a water bowser “ damp down” every day. As the site is visible from my bedroom window in Littleham Road, 30 meters from the north fence, I can inform you it never takes place. We are also told a street sweeper is used to suppress the dust. We have never seen the vehicle.
A resident who lives in Jarvis Close (his wife has a very serious case of COPD), confronted the Site Manger face to face recently and was told “damping down“ takes place in certain areas every 20 minutes. This is a lie.
I have contacted Environmental Health to complain about the red dust. I am not the only Littleham Road resident to have done this.
Alice Gill EHO did call back to inform me that Taylor Wimpy is taking action to reduce the dust. She is telling me what Taylor Wimpey is telling her. It is just not happening. Recent emails informing them again, that there is still a big problem have been ignored.
Food has to be covered to stop contamination from the dust in the kitchen. As windows are left open due to the warm weather we even have dust on tooth brushes in the bathroom. It has permeated into closed cupboards. Yes. It is inside the house!!!
In the meantime elderly resident who have COPD have to inhale red dust, along with everybody else, just because Taylor Wimpey can`t be bothered to do anything.
EDDC Development Management Committee was informed in June 2013 by many local residents that this development would blight the lives of local people. They were not interested.
Perhaps your readers would like to know a few facts regarding this issue, plus the current disinterest.”