Oh, naughty Knowle Residents Association – you have upset EDDC!

Cabinet agenda HERE

Extract from page 55:

Town and Village Green (TVG)

 Using the vehicle of a TVG application, a group of objectors, under the banner of Knowle Residents Association (KRA), are attempting to inhibit EDDC’s ability to develop part of the areas of Knowle designated within the draft Local Plan for residential use.

A TVG application was made after the rejection of the Knowle outline planning application in 2013.   Should the application be wholly successful it would prevent development of Knowle outside the immediate boundary of the current offices. Evidence was submitted by both parties to Devon County Council as the determining authority and EDDC has been pressing for a resolution since the autumn. A one day inquiry was held in the Council Chamber on 10 April 2014 for a barrister appointed by Devon County Council to hear legal argument.

 Whilst prospective developers can accommodate a degree of risk when calculating a value to offer for a development (Judicial Review for example) a TVG is a potentially draconian restriction. The Knowle Residents’ Association original application included Knowle car parks, depot and the external space around the offices including the terrace : sites identified by EDDC for residential development in the Draft Local Plan.

 The KRA has subsequently retreated from trying to designate the Knowle Depot site but continues through the remainder of its TVG application to try and prevent development of the upper carparks and immediate surrounds of the office buildings.

 At the time of writing this report, we await the inspector’s report to County on his view of the TVG application. Pending clarity on the next steps we have paused the marketing exercise for Knowle and Manstone. The TVG application has added time and cost to the Council’s relocation planning.

 

Launch of photo competition for new book on East Devon

The sheer variety and volume of writing inspired by our local area  is behind the idea for a new book, Literature and Landscape in East Devon, to be published later this year.

As announced at last Friday’s hugely entertaining East Devon Writing event, original, relevant, high quality photographs are now being sought for inclusion in the book. Please see PHOTO COMPETITION on the EDA Home page, for precise information.

For a flavour of the forthcoming book, see the following list compiled by Mike Temple of Sidmouth (N.B. only some examples from the list will be included!) the-literature-of-east-devon-by-location . Another ‘taster’ is Robert Crick’s sharply humorous view on the Napoli shipwreck, Cargoes

 

 

East Devon Literature: from Exmouth to Axmouth

Although not an East Devon Alliance event, many members attended Michael Temple’s fascinating evening on the literature of our district last Friday in Ottery St Mary.

Many great writers have been inspired by our area: Coleridge, Conan Doyle, Defoe, Tennyson, C Day Lewis, Wells, Raleigh and Patricia Beer. In an hour and a half of readings, we heard from all of them, and from living local authors too.

Beautifully narrated by Michael, this ninety minute feast reminded us that our part of the world – from Exmouth to Axmouth – has as distinct an identity and a place in literature as any other part of the country.

Thanks were given to all who helped, including local libraries, bookshops and newspapers. Prizes were generously funded by the Sidmouth/ Ottery Herald. The prizewinners were warmly applauded. They were Philip Smith, for  Beer Beach in January: ; and budding author Libby Dean (aged 12), for A Scene from Sidmouth Folk Festival .

(Please note that contrary to an earlier report,Harry Guest did not win a prize in the writing competition – his excellent poem, the Boyhood of Raleigh,pointing to things today which would be unfamiliar to a child of that time, was published back in 1997).

Organiser Michael Temple has added: “I should like to warmly thanks all the readers and living authors who read the extracts and poems so well. (I was the link-man.)”

Knowle should not be marketed until after outcome of village green application say experts

Page 55 of agenda for EDDC Cabinet merting of 4 June 2014:

Marketing of Knowle/Manstone

It was our aim to carry out a marketing exercise in time to report to July 2014 Cabinet and Council on developer interest. Land agents have been interviewed and, in discussion with the Relocation Executive Group, it is recommended the Council employs Savills, an experienced property agency, to manage a marketing exercise for Knowle and Manstone. The tendering exercise for the section of consultants has been completed, and marketing could commence. However, whilst all agents regard the sites as an attractive development proposition of significant value, their advice has been to hold off commencing marketing until there is clarity regarding the outstanding Town and Village Green application for parts of the Knowle.

Gittisham tries to work out what they can do to avoid the disaster of 300 extra houses

https://susiebond.wordpress.com/

Once again local communities are left to fund their own objections to unsustainable developments passed by EDDC – as happened with the Seaton/Colyton green wedge and Feniton where local people raised funds and overturned the decisions.

£705,568 – the minimum spent or pledged so far on the move to Skypark (according to our council’s own figures)

Cabinet Agenda 4 June 2014

Click to access cabinet_040614__-public_version.pdf

Page 53

4.

To approve next phase of project funding.

A further £203,882 is projected to be required for the remainder of 2014/15 bringing total project development cost to £705,568

Environment Agency picks up the tab for EDDC blunder

 

Granary small

Our EDA Environmental Editor reports that a couple of months ago the Environment Agency (EA) put the finishing touches to a £85K flood alleviation scheme by the entrance to Budleigh Salterton cricket field in Granary lane. This is not to protect the cricket field but the handful of houses that have been built in recent years in an area that habitually floods.

It is very welcome news to the residents who have been flooded out four times in in the last couple of years. They had feared they were too few in number to reach the top of EA’s priority list, especially since the coalition cut real expenditure on flood defences. Their urgent needs for protection were also in danger of being deferred as part of longer term studies in how to restore fully functioning tidal flow to the lower reaches of Otter Estuary.

So this is good news, and as an added bonus, the scheme fits unobtrusively into the landscape. Congratulations all round!

However, this £85K expenditure (it’s your money and mine) was entirely avoidable and is the consequence of irresponsible historic planning decisions. Could EDDC make the same mistake again?

Election news from fellow-member of CoVoP

FRAGOFF (Formby Residents Action Group Opposition From Formby), a group from the new national organisation Community Voice on Planning (CoVoP)* of which EDA is an active member, has just sent this e-mail:

Hi All
Many thanks to all our supporters and helpers with our campaign, without whom we would not have been able to put a candidate forward, we won by over 500 votes and FRAG now has a Councillor inside. We have proved if the community stick together no matter what political beliefs they may have you can win and make changes.
Community Action and Not Party Politics has proved to be a winning combination for FRAG and the fact that we are non party political but represent the residents of the community.
Taking a seat from our labour run council who are voting all the housing through makes us feel even better.
If you want to know how we did it just ask us and we can let you know and guide you to a success at your next election. You can do it as well.
Kind regards
Maria

http://www.fragoff.co.uk

*http://covop.org/

N.B. The East Devon Alliance has not put forward candidates for election, but FRAGOFF’s example serves to show what can be done.

 

Don’t miss East Devon Writers event TONIGHT at Ottery St Mary !

A lively evening of free entertainment, celebrating East Devon’s literature and the exceptional landscape that has inspired so much of it.

Venue: The Institute, Ottery St Mary

Time: 7.30 -9 pm

Parking: Free  after 7 pm at nearby Sainsbury’s car park

 

“Should we build less…?”

 

Are large developments on greenfield sites the only way to solve the housing crisis? Here’s some practical lateral thinking:

http://www.theglasshouse.org.uk/reflections-from-the-glass-house-debate-series-2013-14/

 

Bloody noses, but will they listen?

Warning shots fired over the bows of all the major parties and now the war is escalating  and there are likely to be major casualties – mostly US.  Will the major parties (which now presumably includes UKIP) listen?

We will be here.

Performance targets can produce perverse results

In particular, the target that all planning applications should be determined within 13 weeks – something we have had rather a lot of trouble with in East Devon when contentious planning applications have been rushed through with the excuse that the target must be met:

http://www.lgcplus.com/briefings/planning-performance-targets-may-be-driving-perverse-behaviour/5070872.article

Minister friend of Cameron attacks Boles (but only in words!)

Full article from today’s Daily Mail (link at the end of the article)

The countryside could be swamped with thousands of unwanted homes under new planning laws, a minister warned yesterday.  In an outspoken attack, Ed Vaizey says his own government’s ‘presumption in favour of development’ is artificially raising estimates of housing demand.  In a letter to planning minister Nick Boles, the culture minister lays bare Tory fears that the coalition’s decision to tear up planning laws risks alienating traditional supporters and costing votes.

Mr Vaizey, who is one of David Cameron’s closest allies, says the projected levels of housing need in parts of the countryside – including his own Oxfordshire constituency – are up to three times the true figure.  He warns this has ‘significant consequences for many local communities which are now faced with levels of growth that will fundamentally change the nature of settlements’.  He calls for an ‘urgent review of the planning methodology that leads to such massive numbers of homes being planned, so that more realistic outcomes result’.  He says councils are being forced to earmark more and more land for housing or risk falling foul of the development presumption that leaves them little power to block projects they think excessive.

In his reply, Mr Boles defended the push for new housing, saying: ‘One of the key constraints that is affecting growth in some of our most prosperous and dynamic regions are high house prices and affordability. I am sure you will agree this is something we are all working hard to change.’  And he suggested that Mr Vaizey had got some of his facts wrong. He said the new assessment of housing need ‘did not automatically invalidate’ local housing plans and confirmed building on the green belt should be allowed only in exceptional circumstances.

Mr Boles said Oxfordshire should consider creating a new garden city if local communities were unhappy with the idea of expanding existing developments.  Mr Vaizey had warned that the lax rules around infrastructure meant that developers often delivered vital services such as roads and schools years after the houses are built.

The result, he says, is that ‘new and existing residents suffer a severe decline in services for a number of years’. Mr Vaizey’s comments are focused on the situation in Oxfordshire, where there is controversy over official projections that the county needs 100,000 new homes.  He says demographic trends in his own district of the county, the Vale of the White Horse, suggest an extra 468 homes a year are needed. But the ‘national methodology’ has produced a figure up to three times higher.

Four local councils in Oxfordshire have raised concerns about the plans. These include West Oxfordshire, which is run by Mr Cameron’s election agent Barry Norton.  Mr Norton said official housing projections were wrong and were likely to be challenged by the council.

The Prime Minister this week defended the planning changes, and said the result was that ‘planning applications are going up, house building is going up – a 23 per cent increase in houses built’.  He said the planning system was locally driven, and denied claims that Tory councils were blocking housing developments.  He added: ‘We’ve been building in West Oxfordshire more houses than was actually set out under our plan. I don’t accept that all these councils are nimbys.’

Jobs and homes? You might be better off somewhere else in the south west

We are supposed to be building homes to attract (and keep) young people and families.  However, those people will need jobs.  Exeter may not be the best place to have one:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Exeter-salaries-lower-Southwest-neighbours/story-21127405-detail/story.html

Oh, no, Mr Developer – we don’t want cash for the communiyt; Ottery loses out (again)

One has to wonder whether this is a “scorched earth” policy.  What developer these days can’t afford a £30,000 payment for their development given current house prices?

 

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/news/town_could_lose_out_on_developer_s_cash_1_3603890

David Cameron’s election agent fights housing development – in David Cameron’s constituency!

You really could not make it up:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/greenpolitics/planning/10843648/Embarrassment-for-David-Cameron-as-his-own-election-agent-fights-new-homes-in-PMs-back-yard.html

Uplyme, AONB, and the future of cross-district co-operation

A welcome respose from East Devon District Councillor Ian Thomas inreaction to local and EDA concern about the proposals for 350 houses in the AONB near Uplyme. This would take overspill from West Dorset.
Some of what is included in Ian’s blog is about the grey areas of  Village Plans and the SHLAA (Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments).  Some EDA members have direct experience of these processes being heavily and unduly influenced by councillors not declaring interests.
However, we are where we are. At least there is some evidence  emerging of timescales for presenting properly sourced evidence back to the Planning Inspector.