What do you know about your district council candidate?

If they are Conservatives you know almost nothing, unless it is Stuart Hughes in which case you probably know too much!

If they are East Devon Alliance Independent candidate you will know their key issues, priorities, motivation and background and be able to consult a video, blog, gallery and contact information

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/
Transparency and true  localism – knowing exactly what they stand for and why and what they intend to DO without party political interference at district level – that’s the name of the game … but it seems some people in some old parties haven’t yet grasped this.

When is a Tory not a Tory?

When standing for a town council, of course: http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/1051007/sidmouth-north.pdf
Confusing for voters, though, when the very same Stuart Hughes (or a different one?) was the proposer for Tory PPC Hugo Swire. See  http://eastdevon.gov.uk/media/1050699/spn-nop-sps.pdf
EDW note: The second link, above, has a useful list of polling stations…which voters are sometimes unsure of. 

‘Great Support for Candidate who Cares’ (WMN letters)

Here’s the link:  http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/WMN-Letters-Great-support-candidate-cares/story-26373893-detail/story.html

Important dates for new councillors

Wednesday 13 May 6-9 pm  New councillor induction

Wednesday 20 May 6-9 pm – second new councillor induction meeting (NOT a repeat)

Wednesday 27 May 5.30 pm – Chief Executive Briefing

Wednedsay 27 May 6.30 pm – Annual Council Meeting

Tips:  

Do not be intimidated or misled by any information given to you, check it for yourself and sort out the subjective advice and objective advice, the wheat and the chaff.

Much is made of what councillors CANNOT or SHOULD NOT do rather than what they CAN AND SHOULD do.  Always double-check what you have been told.  You have wide powers and basically you are free to do anything that is lawful and of benefit to the district.

Some “old guard” councillors who may be re-elected may be very reluctant to let go of the reins of power – they may have to be wrestled from them.

The Chief Executive and his officers must maintain political neutrality throughout the life of the council.

Much will be made of ” this is how it has always been done”.  To which the reply should be: “Why?  Is there a better, more democratic and transparent way to do it in future”.

The curse of leaders who get too powerful

Editorial in today’s Independent newspaper:

Editorials

Rahman rumbled


Tower Hamlets is a warning. Local politics will be open to abuse so long as mayors can run their councils unopposed


Local government has long been the weakest link in the country’s democratic infrastructure. The verdict that LutfurRahman, the one-time mayor of Tower Hamlets, was guilty of corrupt and illegal practices represents only the latest episode in a long line of crooks and chancers, of whom T Dan Smith, the corrupt leader of Newcastle upon Tyne in the 1960s, was the flashiest and most audacious.


Too often local council leaders become national figures for all the wrong reasons, either purely political or personal – Shirley Porter, in Westminster, for alleged gerrymandering, and Derek Hatton in Liverpool, for sacking his own workers, their redundancy notices delivered by a fleet of taxis.


Mr Rahman’s disqualification is unprecedented for a directly elected mayor, though some others, not least Ken Livingstone in London, have had their share of (much less serious) scrapes. Mr Livingstone may now regret defending Mr Rahman against what he called “smears” when the initial investigation began last year. The verdict vindicates the journalists who first raised doubts about Mr Rahman – and were dubbed “Islamophobic” for their troubles, as were many of those, including political opponents, who stood against him.


In any case, local democracy is certainly not receiving the attention it deserves. On 7 May, people will also be voting in contests covering all 36 metropolitan boroughs, 194 districts, 49 of the unitary authorities, and for various directly elected mayors.


In most of these elections, much more than Westminster this time round, the results are a foregone conclusion. One of the more regrettable consequences of the decline of the Liberal Democrats was their disappearance in council chambers where they were usually the only opposition to an overwhelmingly Labour or Conservative administration.


Outside Scotland and Wales, where the Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru are now making local politics more competitive, Ukip and the Greens are still a minor, though sometimes significant, force. (Not always an effective one, as the chaotic Green-run Brighton and Hove administration and tweets from the madder Ukip councillors prove.)


So far too many councils are virtual one-party states. Take the local authorities covering the constituencies of the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. In the Tory West Oxfordshire, the Conservatives have a grip on 40 of the 49 seats; in Doncaster, Labour holds 50 of the 63 places on the council. In the Miliband family’s home borough of Islington, Labour represents 47 of the 48 wards.


Where such one-party dominance is coupled with a powerful directly elected mayor, as was sometimes the case in TowerHamlets, democracy cannot flourish. By contrast, the London mayoralty works so well because the Mayor’s actual powers are very limited, his ability to raise funds confined to public transport and congestion charging, and he spends comparatively little. Despite the big personalities of Mr Livingstone and Boris Johnson, real power is actually dispersed through the 32 London boroughs. But the mayors in other cities have far too much power and budget for comfort.


The solution is to introduce proportional representation in local councils, which would encourage councillors to work together, blur tribal distinctions and help politics to mature generally. In “hung” councils this has become the norm, and there is no evidence that these are worse run than their one-party state counterparts. The second stage is to end the experiment of directly elected mayors, outside the special case of London.


In many cases they lack legitimacy. In cities such as Leicester the electors were not even offered a referendum to say whether they wanted this radical constitutional innovation in the first place. In Hartlepool, the voters signalled their disaffection by voting in a man in a monkey suit, who served three terms in all before the directly elected mayoralty was abolished by referendum three years ago.


As part of the “Northern Powerhouse” scheme, the Government and local authorities of Lancashire seem determined to create a mayor of the “Greater Manchester Combined Authority” by 2017. That promises the worst of all worlds: a one-party regional government in an unaccountable mega-council. With so much focus on devolution for Scotland, and coalitions at Westminster, local democracy seems set to continue on its path of benign neglect.”

Spotlight on Claire Wright

Sincerity, determination, and smiles from the public, were the key impressions from tonight’s BBC Spotlight feature on East Devon’s Independent Prospective Parliamentary Candidate (PPC), as she knocked on constituents’ doors. Claire spoke of the role of Independents able to act “without a Party Whip breathing down their neck”. In these times of diminished Party loyalty, that could be a vote winner….

TONIGHT: Spotlight to feature East Devon’s Independent Candidate for Parliament

The spotlight will again be on Claire Wright and her bid for Parliament in the May 7th election. See her on BBC TV this evening, on the local ‘Spotlight’ news.

East Devon groundbreaking constituency for Independents for district council AND General Election

Press release from Claire Wright, Independent Parliamentary Candidate

Devon East, where the junior Foreign Office minister Hugo Swire was the local MP and who had a majority of 9,000 in 2010, is now a marginal seat according to the Electoral Reform Society.

Meanwhile Claire Wright, with substantial local government experience, and backed by hundreds of local helpers, is considered by Ladbrokes to be the Independent with the best chance of success in the general election of any Independents in the whole of the UK. The bookies confirm that Claire’s odds have improved further and faster than any genuine, non-local issue Independent for many years. Now considered to be the outstanding challenger to the previous incumbent, Claire continues to garner support and to attract financial contributions from individuals as she will not accept donations from big business.

The backing for Independents in East Devon is not confined to Claire Wright. It also applies at the level of district council. At present, the East Devon District Council is dominated by Conservatives, as it has been for many years.

Two months ago, the East Devon Alliance, previously a successful pressure group, announced that it would form an umbrella group to support candidates wishing to stand at the District council election. Of the 29 wards to be contested, 24 will be fought by Independent candidates. A total of 37 Independent candidates will be standing across the district and 22 will be “Independent East Devon Alliance” on the ballot papers and 15 will be Independent.

Other parties will be fielding 96 candidates but, for the first time ever, the number of Conservatives, at 57, will be overshadowed by the number of non-Conservatives, which is 76.

Paul Arnott, the chairman of the East Devon Alliance said that “taken with the unstoppable rise of the Independent Parliamentary candidate for East Devon, Claire Wright, this phenomenal offer by 37 Independents to the people of the district proves that East Devon better represents the desire for a change in democracy than anywhere else in the United Kingdom.”

If you can’t whip ’em, try seduction! Fifty shades of blue?

Usually well-informed sources tell us that Paul Diviani and Andrew Moulding have been seen together being very, very friendly and obliging to an independent candidate.

Now why should that be, when, as Tory Whip Phil “I’ve never whipped anyone in my life” Twiss memorably said: Independents never do anything useful for their electors?

Is it remotely possible that Paul and Andrew are desperately trying to nobble a few new recruits to make up the Tory losses expected on May 7th?

Candidates District Council elections 2015 – vast majority of seats to be contested, 37Independent candidates

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/elections-and-registering-to-vote/election-documents/district-council-elections-2015/

Three wards are missing from the list as it is presumed candidates are being returned uncontested:
Beer and Branscombe (Geoff Pook – Independent), Clyst Valley (Mike Allen, Conservative) and Trinity (Ian Thomas, Conservative).

ANALYSIS
37 Independent or Independent East Devon Alliance candidates are standing

1 independent candidate elected unopposed (Geoff Pook, Beer)

so, 15 Independent (including 1 elected unopposed)), and 22 Independent East Devon Alliance

One Independent is former Conservative Councillor Roger Boote (Honiton St Pauls) 2 candidates shown as unaffiliated are recent Conservative Councillors Bob Buxton (Dunkeswell) and Andrew Dinnis (Tale Vale) and two candidates show no affiliation Graham Long (Otterhead) and John Dyson (Sidmouth Town)

Yarty, ward of current council leader Paul Diviani, which was uncontested last time, is now being contested by Diviani again for the Conservatives but he is being challenged by Green Party, Independent East Devon Alliance and Liberal Democrat candidates.

BREAKDOWN by WARDS

Axminster Rural 1 seat: 2 candidates, neither Independent
Axminster Town 2 seats: 7 candidates including 1 Independent and one EDA
Broadclyst 2 seats: 4 candidates including 1 Independent
Budleigh 1 seat, 5 candidates including 1 Independent
Coly Valley 2 seats: 4 Candidates including 2 EDA
Dunkeswell 1 seat: 2 candidates including 1 Independent (former Conservative incumbent Bob Buxton)
Exe Valley 1 seat: 2 candidates including 1 EDA
Exmouth Brixington 3 seats: 6 candidates including 1 EDA
Exmouth Halsdon 3 seats: 6 candidates including 1 EDA
Exmouth Littleham 3 seats: 7 candidates including 1 EDA
Exmouth Town 3 seats: 8 candidates, none Independent
Exmouth Withycombe Raleigh 3 seats: 7 candidates, none Independent
Feniton and Buckerell 1 seat: 2 candidates including 1 Independent
Honiton St Michaels 3 seats: 8 candidates including 1 Independent and 1 EDA
Honiton St Pauls 2 seats: 6 candidates, including 1 Independent (former Conservative Councillor Roger Boote)
Newbridges 1 seat: 2 candidates, neither Independent
Newton Poppleford and Harpford 1 seat: 2 candidates including 1 EDA
Otterhead 1 seat: 2 candidates including one no affiliation
Ottery St Mary Rural 2 seats: 4 candidates including 2 EDA
Ottery St Mary Town 2 seats: 5 candidates including 2 Independent
Raleigh: 1 seat: 2 candidates including one EDA
Seaton 3 seats: 10 candidates including 1 Independent
Sidmouth Rural 1 seat: 2 candidates including 1 Independent
Sidmouth Sidford 3 seats: 8 candidates including 1 Independent and 3 EDA
Sidmouth Town 3 seats: 6 candidates including 2 EDA and one unaffiliated (John Dyson)
Tale Vale 1 seat: 1 Independent (former Conservative Councillor Andrew Dinnis)
Whimple 1 seat: 2 candidates neither Independent
Woodbury and Lympstone: 2 seats: 3 candidates including 2 EDA
Yarty: 1 seat: 4 candidates including 1 EDA

Susie Bond (Independent, Feniton) standing again and supports other independent candidates

See her latest blogpost here: https://susiebond.wordpress.com/2015/04/09/and-were-off/

You only have to look at the records of our Independent councillors such as Susie, Claire Wright, Roger Giles and Ben Ingham to see that independent councillors makes the biggest impact on scrutiny of our current majority Conservative council. Now we need them to be the decision-makers.

Recall that before Susie was elected Feniton was in the hands of ex- councillor Graham Brown …

Meet the Candidates (East Devon PPCs, and for Sidmouth Town and District Council), organised by VGS

Click here for details: VGS hustings poster1.pages

Sidmouth: meet your candidates

From the East Devon Alliance website:

eastdevonalliance.org.uk

(where – as soon as nominations have closed in 9 April – you will find details of all candidates standing under the East Devon Alliance umbrella)

This month the Vision Group for Sidmouth (VGS) is running three “Meet the Candidates” events in the run up to the elections on May 7th.

Dates for your diaries are:

EDDC – Wednesday 15th April

Town Council – Tuesday 21st April
East Devon Parliamentary – Tuesday 28th April.

For the EDDC and Parliamentary elections you will need to forward your questions to

info@visionforsidmouth.org

before the event. More details on the Vision Group for Sidmouth website.

Read more at: http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/news/20150402/vision-group-for-sidmouth-meet-the-candidates-events/

The eleventh hour: why you should vote Independent

For those who do not click on links, here is the text of Paul Arnott of the independent East Devon Alliance’s hopes for change at the crucial district elections as they appear in the current Devonshire magazine:

My first published book about fifteen years ago concerned a subject with a very boring name – adoption – with its potentially dull backdrop of social services and filing cabinets. The only way to animate it was by my personal story. I did not know until my mid-thirties that I had been illegitimately conceived in 1961 by a scared young Irish couple in London, who later went on to marry in Dublin and have four more children, my full-blood siblings. I was a devoted Englishman who it transpired had flesh and blood from County Carlow.

Now here is another boring word – planning. How to persuade a reader that at its dark heart may be the seedbed for the rebirth of our moribund national democracy? It has to be me again, for which I apologise. I was diagnosed with leukaemia four years ago, had a bone marrow transplant three years ago, am fully recovered and should be doing something quiet and nurturing with this reborn life – learning to paint, taking up the harp etc.

Instead I find myself chairman of a movement called the East Devon Alliance, which is supporting a network of Independent candidates to fight the majority of ward seats in the district election happening on the same day as those for Parliament.

It is the biggest Independent effort in British electoral history, more than 40 individual, plucky people who have decided they cannot trust our beloved environment to the whims of a one-party council dominated by pals of developers any longer. They have realised, in supposedly sleepy East Devon, that democracy can only be revived by entirely changing the guard. Indeed, perhaps in this roots-up path may be found the eventual route to national reform?

When I first fell amongst these lovely people, their horror stories from about twenty towns and villages were of a piece with my experience before being ill, making J.K Rowling’s A Casual Vacancy seem like a Year One show-and-tell project. To all of us, it was now beyond doubt that many dominant parish, town and district councillors (and sometimes clerks) mainly sought office to grease the wheels for planning consents for their allies.

Dysfunction was endemic in even the loveliest communities. Rigged agendas, bullying in meetings, and fixed minutes, were all product of the ugly elephant in too many civic rooms. In 2011, the coalition government, announced that in Planning the mantra would now be a “presumption in favour of development”.

It was game on for many well-placed councillors. The only protection against ill-conceived building in the wrong places (key agricultural land) for the wrong people (we need low-cost housing, not executive homes) was for a district to have an adopted (that boring word, again) Local Plan in place. By extraordinary chance, East Devon District Council has managed its affairs in such a way that after an unopposed four year term of office, in a relatively simple area to deal with, it has no such Local Plan at all. Naked in the conference chamber.

Instead, as in the Ireland of my genetic forebears, there is a rush for re-zoning arable for industrial estates, and a gross over-inflation of need at the upper end of the housing market. Of equal concern, there is no positive vision either. Nimbys is the stale acronym thrown at the likes of us. This is unjust.

All of us have identified adjacent to our towns and villages former factories or farmyards which are ideally located for brownfield development, many derelict for years.

Why isn’t the District Council making a united effort to build on these? Is it because this would reduce the need to build on the greenfield locations owned or agented by councillors’ pals, who have long favoured decisions to be made in skittle alleys, lodges and clubs.

We are now at the eleventh hour. I emerged from five months incarceration in a sterile, isolated hospital room to recuperate not in the pollution and tarmac of the London where I was born, but the valleys and hills of the county I love, the landscape which sustains our two essential industries of agriculture and tourism. I, and my fellow Independents, cherish and understand the meaning of stewardship – that we are but passing through. And if we can take back the reins of our afflicted district from the one-party group who now have hold, it is not too late for East Devon to become governed not as the land for robber barons but for a new era of stewards protecting democracy and environment alike.

Click to access devonshire_magazine_april-may_2015-return_of_the_good_stewards.pdf

Going, going, gone!

Auctioneering, and electioneering, feature in the latest posts on http://realzorro1.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/independents-vote-in-change-vote-out.html

East Devon sees ‘the biggest Independent effort in British electoral history’

The new Devonshire Magazine has this report: http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/news/20150331/return-of-the-good-stewards/

District council election candidates – deadline 9 April to register

You have until 4 pm on Thursday 9 April to register as a district council election candidate.

If you wish to stand as an East Devon Alliance independent candidate, please get in touch with them via their website:

http://www.eastdevonalliance.org.uk/

Information about being a councillor:

http://www.local.gov.uk/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=fa4de86d-1009-4b58-a9e7-3103fe3d9a36

Inappropriate remarks about Parliamentary Candidate, by EDDC Chief Executive

Extraordinarily, there have been two Extra Ordinary Meetings of EDDC on consecutive days this week. On Wednesday evening (25 March), councillors attended a hastily-called decisive meeting about Knowle relocation. The very next afternoon (26 March), with similar rapidity, a meeting about the revised Local Plan was fixed, with the aim of approving it.

A correspondent tells us,

‘At the second of these meetings, Cllr Claire Wright had moved two very sensible amendments which the Chief Executive did not appear to like. The first was to ask the Inspector to allow two weeks more time for public consultation on the changes which were to be agreed at this meeting. The proposal had been to allow six weeks from 1st April. As was said by Hon Alderman Vivienne Ash, this would virtually disqualify many parish councils from commenting, because of the election ‘purdah’ period in which they would not be meeting. Councillors accepted the amendment, and so it was agreed to ask the Inspector to increase the public consultation period from six, to eight weeks.

Cllr Claire Wright’s second amendment was to invite the authors of the report on which EDDC was being asked to increase housing numbers, to a meeting in the near future to explain their findings and give members the opportunity to question them. Cllr Roger Giles backed the idea, adding that two opportunities for questions to the housing numbers experts, had already been missed this week (namely at the special Development Management Committee on 23 March, and ,indeed, at the current meeting (26 March).

It was at this point that the Chief Executive made what could be taken as totally inappropriate remarks. Arguing against Cllr Wright’s amendment, Mark Williams referred to “Councillor Wright`s parliamentary ambitions” and then veered off course, lecturing the rather bemused assembly about about the Exeter wards of Topsham, and St Loye`s being part of the East Devon constituency.

Cllr Giles made a point of order, and protested that what the Chief Exec was saying was irrelevant to the debate and inappropriate.’

Many of East Devon’s electorate, who will be living with the consequences of the Local Plan, would strongly agree with Cllr Giles.