Planning applications validated by EDDC for week beginning 3 May

Ex-Boris Johnson aide accused of lobbying for £187m government loan for firm he worked for

Boris Johnson’s former top aide Lord Eddie Lister has been accused of lobbying for a £187m taxpayer-funded loan for a company he worked for while in Number 10.

Stefan Boscia www.msn.com 

Lister, who suddenly left Number 10 last month, had a paid role at luxury property developer Delancey while simultaneously working for Johnson and as chairman for Homes England.

The Sunday Times revealed today that Lister attended a meeting at Homes England, a government body, that was being held to deliberate on a £187m loan application for a Delancey-run project.

The loan was approved.

At the time, Lister told other people at the Homes England meeting that he had “previously undertaken advisory work for Delancey”.

The minutes of the meeting say: “The committee were content that this did not constitute a conflict of interest.”

However, this was revealed to be untrue as he was still being paid by Delancey for consultancy work.

In his register of interests at the time Lister said he was working for Dream Ltd – a reference to Delancey Real Estate Asset Management.

Whitehall sources told the Times that some civil servants were concerned that Delancey were receiving preferential treatment.

One said they had been under “enormous pressure” to rubber stamp the loan.

Shadow justice secretary David Lammy said: “The sleazy, grubby, double-dealing Conservatives have rotten government to its core.”

Lister apologised for not fully disclosing his links with Delancey to Homes England and insisted “there was never any intent to gain any unfair advantage for the company”.

“On the board, I had no substantive involvement in matters relating to Delancey, recognising the potential for a conflict of interest,” he said.

“I do accept that it would have been better to fully recuse myself at the meeting where the Get Living consortium was discussed, given my separate role with the Delancey group of companies.”

The post Ex-Boris Johnson aide accused of lobbying for £187m government loan for firm he worked for appeared first on CityAM.

Microsoft and partners may be compensated if you purchase something through recommended links in this article.

The view inside the People’s Republic of Chipping Norton

Pssst – didn’t East Devon get there first? It’s what happens when Conservtive loyalties are stretched to breaking point – Owl

Tom Wall www.theguardian.com

The honey-stone centre of Chipping Norton and its affluent surrounding villages were once famed as the haunts of former PM David Cameron, along with his set of wealthy, powerful media and political allies. It is perhaps, then, the last place you would expect to witness the stirrings of anti-Tory southern rebellion. But this month it happened when the Cotswolds ward – along with nine others in Oxfordshire – rejected the Conservatives.

This week could see a rainbow, progressive coalition – made up of Liberal Democrats, Labour and the Greens – put the Conservatives into opposition for the first time in the county’s history. This comes after an alliance of non-Tory councillors last week took power in Cambridgeshire after the Conservatives lost control of the county – as well as losing the mayoral contest to Labour. The blue citadel of Tunbridge Wells borough council was also breached as the Conservatives lost their overall majority for the first time in more than 20 years.

These shifts in voter behaviour have received less attention than Labour’s ongoing struggles in some former red wall seats in the Midlands and the north, but some pollsters believe the crumbling of southern Tory strongholds could pose the party serious electoral problems. Professor Rob Ford of Manchester University argues that relatively affluent, well-educated voters are turning against the Tories in parts of the south-east, reflecting the breakdown of traditional, class-based voting patterns since the EU referendum. “The Conservatives risk falling into the same trap that New Labour did when it won in the south,” he says. “You get so excited about your advance in terrain that’s unfamiliar that you lose touch with your traditional heartlands.

“If the loyalties of Tory voters are stretched to breaking point, then it could get quite dramatic.”

Chipping Norton’s victorious Labour county councillor, Geoff Saul, is still coming to terms with his narrow 60-vote win, which encompasses the town and rural villages. “It’s a bit of a shock,” he said, in the cramped back room of his solicitor’s firm in the town. “It’s been a safe Conservative seat for 15 years.”

The signs of change were there if you looked closely, however. Saul and his small band of party activists have been patiently making inroads for years. “When I first moved here [20 years ago], most other councillors were Conservative. We’ve now got three Labour district councillors and 11 out of the 16 town councillors are Labour. Market towns have not been fertile territory for Labour, but we’ve turned Chippy red.”

There is plenty of evidence of this localised red surge, with Labour placards still adorning Cotswold-stone cottages and blooming, pretty gardens throughout the town. For some, there is pure jubilation. “I’m so pleased. I’ve just tweeted ‘I’m having soup in the people’s republic of Chipping Norton’,” says Edwina Lawrence, 69, an NHS coach, sitting outside a cafe on the High Street. “I’m very happy.”

Labour can count on unionised workers, mostly in the public sector, and increasingly professionals too. “The cottages that used to be for tweed mill workers 100 years ago are now full of university professors and teachers – that’s where I get lots of my votes,” says Saul.

Younger graduates with progressive voting habits are also moving from cities like Oxford. “[The result in Oxfordshire] goes against what is happening in the rest of the country, but maybe it is because of the move out of Oxford,” said Nicola Chadwick, 34outside the town’s Midcounties Co-operative, which has its roots in workers organising in the industrial revolution. “I’ve just moved [from Oxford]. I voted Labour and Green.”

Meanwhile, the Conservative vote is breaking for progressive parties. Rachel Stringer, 30, who previously always voted Tory, opted for Labour. “I’ve lost faith in the Tories. Brexit had a big impact because I’m anti-Brexit. I cried the morning after the referendum,” she says. “I thought I would never vote Labour – it’s bizarre.”

Other Conservatives feel overlooked and switched to the Greens. “It was a protest vote with a heart,” says Tina Gibbons, while her spaniel waits at her feet. Her friend, Sarah Eve, also turned against the Tories: “[This town] was very high-profile when we had David Cameron but it has been neglected since”

These painful upheavals for the ruling party were repeated across the county. The Lib Dems gaining eight councillors and the Greens three councillors. The Conservative leader of the council and chair of the LGA’s wellbeing board, Ian Hudspeth, lost to his Lib Dem opponent, Andy Graham.

While local issues such as contentious housing developments played their part, there is agreement that underlaying changes in traditional voting patterns are making life harder for the Conservatives in Oxfordshire.

The thoughtful new leader of the Conservative group, Eddie Reeves, says: “The party focus is quite understandably in growth areas. That will necessarily entail growing pains elsewhere. We are part of the unloved Tory shires.”

Oxfordshire Tory MPs such as John Howell in Henley and Victoria Prentis in Banbury, he adds,should not be complacent, he warns. “Those majorities were inflated by getting Brexit done and the Corbyn fear factor. I could well see them, a bit like a souffle, going [down] at the next election if there’s a strong Labour or Lib Dem challenger,” he says. “They are not as rock solid as they seem.”

Torbay Council sets up housebuilding company

Torbay Council has set up its own housing development company as part of its multi-million pound plans to tackle the housing crisis.

[You can guess that Torbay is not Conservative controlled – Owl]

Ed Oldfield, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk 

Torbay is the most deprived area in Devon with only half the national average of social housing. One in four households rent privately and an estimated one in four children live in poverty. The area saw homelessness rising before the pandemic with hundreds of families on the waiting list. A council report at the end of 2019 described the situation as a housing crisis.

The council is now pressing ahead with plans to use its own companies to build and rent  homes, as well as working with established social housing providers. The project is expected to involve the authority lending more than £40 million towards building at least 360 homes, with more than 200 for social rent.

TEDC Developments will design and build the properties to be rented out by TorVista Homes,  both council-owned companies set up by the TDA Group, which is owned by the council to deliver economic development.

TorVista Homes was given registered provider status by the social housing regulator in March, which allows it to receive funding from the government agency Homes England. The council says it plans to deliver a range of affordable housing including temporary accommodation, extra care housing, homes for older people, social rent, affordable rent and shared ownership.

Housing has been identified as one of the key areas to be tackled by the partnership of Liberal Democrats and Independents which runs the authority under its aim to tackle poverty. 

The amount of social housing in Torbay at eight out of 100 homes is less than half the national average of 17. 

The council’s cabinet is being recommended to approve a business plan for TorVista Homes. A report to a meeting on this week gives an outline of the project, but the business plan document is being kept confidential because it contains financial information.

The report said the plan sets out that of the first 360 homes to be delivered by TorVista Homes, more than 200 will be for social rent. It said the lower level of assumed activity will involve spending more than £62 million, with the council expected to provide loans of more than £45 million.

The report said: “The financial implications of this new venture for the council are inevitably considerable. The scale of development and the figures to be invested are considerable although this spend is complemented by significant investment by Homes England by the way of grant.”

It is known that the council has allocated £25 million of borrowing to kick-start the housing plans. It is bringing forward plans to build flats for older people at the Crossways shopping centre in Paignton, and develop housing off Preston Down Road.

Another social housing scheme being progressed by the council is on land at Tweenaway Cross in Paignton. Planning permission was given in October 2015 to demolish the empty houses and build two three-bedroom houses and five two-bedroom flats. But the project failed to go ahead and a new planning application was approved in March 2019 to replace the houses with eight two-bedroom flats and one accessible one-bedroom flat.

Plans are being drawn up to develop council-owned land on part of the Victoria car park site at Paignton. The authority has also done a deal to sell land at Little Blagdon Farm to housing developer Taylor Wimpey, with a condition that three in 10 of the homes are for social housing.

In May 2020, the council’s cabinet set an annual target of delivering 180 new affordable homes.

Housebuilding has slowed in recent years in Torbay, meaning the number has fallen below government targets.  The stock of future housing sites has also fallen short of the required levels.

That has given developers a stronger case for schemes such as Inglewood, near Paignton, where a new village of up to 373 homes was approved by a planning inspector in March.

Fear and anger at plans which could leave towns unrecognisable

One Devon Tory MP says he will oppose the Planning Bill. No, not Simon Jupp or Neil Parish. – Owl

Frankie Mills www.devonlive.com

Dramatic proposals to reform the UK’s planning system were unveiled in the Queen’s Speech. If passed, the changes have the potential to create a housing boom that could give developers more free rein developing large swathes of rural areas.

Some residents in Totnes and Dartington fear it could permanently change the face of the town and destroy the green spaces that they have been fighting to protect, while others are concerned it would permit the development of expensive second homes in an area that locals have been priced out of in recent years.

If passed, South Hams, along with each council district in the U.K, will be divided into three categories: ‘growth’, ‘protection’ and ‘renewal.’ Growth areas will have current planning restrictions largely removed while development in ‘protection’ and ‘renewal’ zones will continue to be restricted.

The Planning Bill was announced at a time when Totnes has just been listed as the most searched for countryside market town on property website Rightmove. At the time of writing, there are currently zero properties available to rent in Totnes and 52 properties available to buy.

Anthony Mangall MP for Totnes said he firmly opposed the bill and would vote against it.

“My concern is that we’re going to get houses in the wrong places, we are not going to ensure we’ve got the proper infrastructure to deal with the increase of houses and people, and that we aren’t going to build affordable houses, which is what people need,” said Mr Mangall.

“One of the issues that we’ve had in the last 13, 14, 15 months, has been people being very quickly priced out of the area in which they were born and raised,”

“It’s great that we are an attractive place for people to come and live and work, but I’m also very conscious that… we need to make sure that we are not just building second homes,” he said.

“We’re in a perfect storm,” said Georgina Allen, chair Of planning for Totnes Town Council.

“What’s needed is one bedroom houses for the youth… and smaller family homes. These big executive homes with very little garden are the ones that are the cheapest to build and the most expensive to buy,” she said.

Allen fears that more homes will increase poverty in South Devon, an area where jobs are already restricted to two main industries.

“You’re asking for really severe levels of poverty, we’re not rich. We are totally dependent on the tourist trade and farming. There’s almost no other jobs,” she said.

Allen has been part of the campaign ‘Save Dartington’ for the past several years and has seen green spaces being sold off for development first hand as a means to pay for the estate’s debts.

She is concerned that new housing in an area like Dartington would mean selling off more green spaces and creating additional strain on the few existing facilities.

“Dartington has almost nothing,” said Allen. “All these new houses will have one garage and one shop,” said Allen.

“We will lose the countryside just when we need it most,” she said.

Manhall said that there was a significant number of Conservative MP’s who were working to reform the bill in a way that would be suitable for areas like Totnes and Dartington.

Manhall was one of the many Conservative MP’s who fought against the ‘housing algorithm’, an algorithm that predicted the amount of new homes needed to be built in different zones.

The algorithm predicted that South Hams would need a 117% increase in new homes. The scheme was scrapped after it was found to be based on incorrect data.

“The reason that we asked people to put in neighbourhood plans was because we recognise that every local community has its own views and own interests and own needs,” said Manhall.

“People in South Devon have been very clear about developing their own local neighbourhood plans. These neighbourhood plans matter, they need to be listened to,” he said.

Building crisis looms as dwindling supplies bring sites grinding to a halt

By tradition, the wits of every construction apprentice are tested with two errands early on in their career: to ask the foreman first for some tartan paint and then a long weight.

James Tapper www.theguardian.com 

The joke is ringing even more hollow than usual on building sites across the UK, where firms needing essential building supplies are facing some very, very long waits. The British building industry is in the midst of a supply crisis. From roof tiles to steel, timber to insulation, paint to kitchen sinks, products are scarce – and when they can be found, they’re expensive.

Timber costs 80% more than it did in November, steel joists are more expensive because iron ore has gone up by more than 80%. Soft wood is up by almost 100%. Aluminium is up by about a quarter. Copper is up 40%. Plastics up 60%. Paints are up by about a third.

A combination of Covid and Brexit has caused the crisis, while delays to global supplies caused by March’s Suez crisis have not helped either. They are affecting projects big and small, across the country.

Garry Moore is one of those affected. He moved his 94-year-old father Stan into their family home in Westcliff-on-Sea in Essex during the first lockdown last year, but space was an issue. “He didn’t want to go back to living on his own so we’re having an extension built,” Moore said. “A loft conversion above the garage. I thought it would be a fairly quick job.”

Three months later, the roof still isn’t finished and several walls remain unplastered, but not for lack of trying.

“My builder went up to the Midlands yesterday to look for some tiles, and he couldn’t get them there either. We ordered enough but we’ve only had about half delivered – we’re about 1,000 short. They’re normal terracotta tiles, but you just can’t get them. And there’s no plaster either. I’ve no idea when it will be finished.”

Roof tiles are particularly scarce but go to most builders’ yards and you’ll hear the same story about virtually every product from steel and timber to insulation and kitchen stoves.

“It seems to be almost everything that you need for doing domestic building or any sort of construction,” said Duncan Brock, group director at the Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply, which measures construction industry pricing every month. “The only thing we’re not seeing shortages of is PPE.”

“Demand has increased so rapidly,” said Noble Francis, professor of construction economics at University College London and economics director at the Construction Products Association (CPA), which represents UK firms that make building supplies. “Construction output in April 2020, at the nadir in the initial lockdown, was 45% lower than a year earlier. By March this year, it was already above pre-Covid levels.”

Homeowners are driving the boom – spending is up by 19% in March compared with January 2020. People in secure jobs with little opportunity to spend money on holidays and restaurants decided to invest in their homes and gardens. That appetite for home improvement has boomed since the vaccination programme, after the collective savings of the UK’s luckier classes swelled by about £180bn.

It’s not simply higher prices and shortages – delays are growing too. Cold-rolled steel joists will take nearly five months to arrive, compared with the usual six weeks, according to figures compiled by Aecom, the infrastructure consultancy, for Building magazine.

MDF wood, beloved of interior designers on TV makeover shows, usually takes a week to arrive; now it takes six. Roof battens were usually held in stock by building merchants but now there’s a month-long delay. And the reason why Garry Moore’s builder travelled 150 miles to look for some roof tiles is because the order time has gone from six weeks to a dizzying six months.

“It’s not just construction output here that has recovered very quickly,” Francis said. “Global construction has as well. And that’s particularly the case in the US. Lumber prices in the US have gone up over 250% in the past year.”

Other factors are the blockage of the Suez canal by the Ever Given, and global shipping is still struggling with the disruption caused when Covid first hit and empty containers were stacked up in western ports instead of returning to China. The cost of sending a container from China to northern Europe jumped from US$1,475 in May last year to US$8,303 last Friday, according to the Freightos Baltic Index.

Jonathan Hayter, the owner of Lloyd’s Gardens of London, has an order book that’s full to bulging for the next 18 months, but he has some more immediate headaches to deal with. “We have an account with our regular builders’ merchants and normally we buy pallets of 65 bags of cement,” he said. “These last two weeks, I’ve been rationed to five bags per collection. You can’t do anything with that.

“I’ve had to tell all my customers: ‘You won’t hear from me for two weeks’. Because I’m just driving around builders’ merchants. I’ve turned into an Amazon delivery driver. I’ve driven about 600 miles this week going around Watford and north London, and by 6.30pm on Wednesday night I had a tonne and a half of materials in my van, driving really slowly over speed bumps. You phone ahead but no one will say if they have anything in stock – ‘Just come and check’. It’s ridiculous.”

His cement prices have doubled, and stock quality is troubling him. “Some of it’s a shambles, absolutely shocking. We got some oak sleepers last week, from a reputable supplier. They were bent like bananas.”

Anyone tempted to do it themselves is facing similar problems. The social media feeds for Homebase and B&Q have regular questions about the apparently lengthening lists of items that are out of stock, or will take months to deliver.

Sheds at Homebase can be ordered but the firm’s website warns some will take up to 99 days to arrive. Most fence panelling at B&Q is listed as out of stock except its standard traditional fencing. Homebase refused to discuss its supply situation. B&Q said it was “working closely with our suppliers to manage stock levels and ensure we have products available for customers when they need them”.

Some DIY-ers like Jake Shropshire, an estate agent in Hertfordshire, have pressed ahead. In January he began building an outdoor kitchen, hoping that the wood-burning oven and outdoor seating under a covered pavilion would be ready by summer.

“Like the rest of the world during lockdown, we decided to do up our outdoor space,” he said. “I’ve got a friend who’s a carpenter and we’ve been doing it together. I thought it would take a few weekends.”

Four oak posts that were meant to arrive in 10 days still hadn’t turned up eight weeks later. The timber for the roof and sides has turned up piecemeal, if at all, and it was a battle to get the concrete base done.

“I just got an email today about the kitchen units, saying the container from China has been delayed,” Shropshire said. “It should have been here in March and now they’re saying it’s going to be July.”

The reality of buyers competing for the attention of sellers is that wholesalers and builders’ merchants will tend to favour regular, larger customers, Brock said. Large infrastructure projects such as HS2, the London tideway, Crossrail, the Leeds flood alleviation scheme and Birmingham’s Big City plan are unlikely to be affected.

“The builders’ merchants and distributors will be selecting who they supply to based on long-term loyalty and long-term plans,” he said. “The construction sector is typically not very good at long-term planning, which means they’re not good at forecasting what they need, and so suppliers don’t know how much they need to order.

“Most builders don’t have any idea where most of their supplies come from, and they haven’t had to care until the last 12 months.”

So where do the UK’s supplies come from? Bricks and bulky materials like sand and gravel are almost all locally produced – 76% of materials are made in the UK – but about two-thirds of sawn wood is imported, according to the Forestry Commission. Much of it comes from Europe, particularly Sweden, but the US is now competing for wood.

Europe’s larger manufacturing base also provides a substantial proportion of UK steel and other metals. Plastics rely on the oil industry, and February’s big freeze in Texas caused polymer production to crash by 80%.

Specialist products need to be sourced from further afield. When Garry Moore is not worrying about his dad’s roof, he makes a living as an inventor – the originator of the Propelair toilet, which uses 84% less water than a standard loo by flushing with compressed air, but is only fitted in offices and commercial buildings.

Moore has created a smaller toilet, the Velocity, which is suitable for domestic houses – “it could save an enormous amount of water”, he said – and is about to launch trials of his new invention with Essex County Council.

“It uses plastics and ceramics,” he said. “But we’ve had trouble sourcing ceramic suppliers, and also the polymers for the plastic parts. So I’m arranging the trip to China next month to go to the factories, and try and sort suppliers.” Rather like during last year’s rush for PPE, securing supplies can rest on personal relationships with factory bosses.

There is little else that firms can do but wait, and plan ahead. The UK is a modest buyer in global terms compared to the US, China and the Middle East, Brock said.

Brexit is another factor. Some smaller EU exporters have given up on the UK because of new trade barriers, according to Building magazine. Peter Caplehorn, the CPA’s chief executive, said last week that the UK could run out of key materials because there are not enough facilities to test them and provide the new UKCA certification which replaces the European CE quality mark.

Even those builders in the southeast who have materials are finding it impossible to recruit skilled workers because the number of construction workers from the EU in the UK has fallen by 42% since 2017, from 208,067 to 120,723 – nearly all having worked in London. “Don’t even go there,” Hayter said. “There’s not a shortage – there’s just no labour. The cupboard’s bare.”

Yorkshire and the north-west, which have been riding the wave of the UK’s building boom, may see workers heading south for higher wages.

“If they build a third runway at Heathrow, it will suck up all the spare subcontractor labour,” Brock said. “People vote with their feet. That’s why you get the vans on the motorway on a Monday driving down from the north-east.”

Mark Beard, the chairman of Beard construction, said there may be a second squeeze on labour in the south, if eastern European subcontractors decide to take longer holidays to make up for time missed during the lockdowns.

“We’re nervous about the summer,” he said. “If Europe opens up, some of our eastern European labour might want to take four or five weeks off this summer, instead of the two weeks they’ve had in the past.”

The rising prices may hurt firms which had longer contracts, because they were locked into lower pre-pandemic prices, he added, and the industry is also facing higher insurance costs after the Grenfell disaster.

“But there is a flip side – it really forces people to look at their procedures, to minimise risk. It’s driving better behaviours, better processes.” And if wages rise, that might push building firms towards modular manufacturing – building homes in factories.

“The car industry went through a crisis in the 1970s and came out renewed. If we get a perfect storm in our industry, people will look for innovations that will make us better five years down the road.”

People arriving from India spent hours in tightly packed Heathrow queues, says passenger

Is this an action replay of 15 months ago? – Owl

A woman who arrived in the UK from “red-list” India last week has claimed passengers from her flight queued for hours next to travellers from other flights despite concern over mutant Covid-19 variants.

By Hugo Daniel

Maggie Sisson, 50, flew in from Bengaluru in India, last Friday. She told i it took her four and half hours to get to her quarantine hotel after landing – even though she was staying in Terminal 5’s Sofitel hotel and that social distancing was non-existent.

“Red-list” passengers were directed to queue for immigration on the far right side of the arrivals hall – but some non-red list passengers were also queueing as close as “five metres” away, Ms Sisson claims.

“It was the most crowded space I’ve been in since the pandemic began. It [arrivals] is all in one area, but there was hundreds of us.” she told i.

The expatriate, who has lived in India for 15 years and who had returned to the UK to visit family, waited for more than two hours in an immigration line and the rest of the time waiting for a bus to her hotel also in the terminal with other non “red-list” passengers.

She said: “It was pure madness at Heathrow. If I do test positive I have no doubt the exposure would have been there.

“I ended up being hours in a small space with people, yes they had masks on, but with so many other people for a long amount of time, that to me defeats the whole purpose of quarantining.

“My concern was not only for us in the ‘red list’ immigration queue but the fact that this queue is in the same area as all arrivals for immigration.

“People are arriving from red list countries and you’re making an effort to do a separate channel, why would you extend the amount of time and therefore the amount of exposure to other people? It’s just insanity, it defeats the whole purpose.”

After showing passports, passenger locator forms and hotel details, the “red-list” passengers were put into groups of 15 and escorted downstairs to collect their baggage – but this was also in the same area as other passengers, Ms Sisson claims.

Concerned about the waiting times, she posted in the Facebook support group for people entering hotel quarantine, which currently has more than 5,000 members, and several people shared similar experiences.

One wrote: “It took me and my mum about seven hours in the end. We were in queues in Heathrow for about 5.5 hours, but then it took another 1.5 hours getting on the coach and waiting to leave”. Another traveller said they queued for six hours and added simply: “Was awful”

Ms Sisson, originally from London, said: “For the first 45 minutes the queue didn’t move I can’t say we were socially distanced. The babies screamed, small kids ran around without masks.

“They came round with water because everyone was hot and bothered, so people removed there masks to drink. I didn’t drink mine, there was no way I was going to take off my mask. I had been so careful in India and on my travels.”

Ms Sisson, a physiotherapist, said the bus queue to hotel line was also “within five metres” of other passengers collecting baggage and exiting customs and she claims she queued for 90 minutes.

She said: “They herded us into a corner. Anyone exiting the airport has to go out of that customs exit which is directly opposite where we were held, it cannot be a good idea.”

Her experience at Sofitel has been good and on day two her coronavirus test came back negative.

However on May 11, day four of quarantine, she was notified notification by NHS Test and Trace that she had been in contact with someone who tested positive. She told staff about her airport experience and claims the person she spoke to was “horrified”.

She said: “They were very nice but absolutely couldn’t believe it. They said that’s insane, how can we not know about this, it just defeats the point of everything’.”

Ms Sissons said she thought the authorities should be expediting the “red list” passengers through.

She said: “You’d have thought you wouldn’t want us held anywhere, you’d want us off that plane ticking us off as quickly as possible, putting us on a bus straight away and off to a hotel.

“What horrifies me is the UK is meant to be opening to more flights from Monday and I don’t see how they can cope with it, you can’t have more people and that system going on. Surely, you’re going to have travellers coming in not needing quarantine, in a space where there’s kids that are maskless, may be asymptomatic, bringing these variants? For me it’s insanity.”

A spokesperson for Heathrow airport said: “In order to ensure passengers are not left to queue for unacceptable lengths of times on arrival, the Government must deliver on the automation of the Passenger Locator Form to allow e-gates to reopen and Border Force must man every desk to prevent bottlenecks from forming at the border.”

A Home Office spokesperson said: “Protecting public health is our priority and as we reopen international travel safely we will maintain 100 per cent health checks at the border to protect the wider public and our vaccine rollout. 

“While we do this, wait times are likely to be longer and we will do all we can to smooth the process, including the rollout of our e-Gate upgrade programme during the summer and deploying additional Border Force officers.

“Every airport, including Heathrow, has a responsibility to comply with social distancing and Covid measures on site.”

Boris Johnson’s Mustique holiday ‘was worth double the £15,000 declared’

If you see through Boris Johnson does that make him transparent? – Owl

Parliament’s standards watchdog reportedly believes Boris Johnson’s holiday to Mustique was worth more than double the £15,000 he declared in the Commons register.

www.lbc.co.uk

The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Kathryn Stone, also said the bill had not been met by Tory donor David Ross as the Prime Minister has insisted, according to the Daily Mail.

Ms Stone, who investigates allegations and complaints against MPs, confirmed earlier this week she is still looking into whether Mr Johnson properly declared the holiday on the private island 16 months ago.

The latest revelation will heap further pressure on the PM as he faces various investigations into whether he properly declared any donations to cover the lavish refurbishments of his official flat.

Downing Street insisted Mr Johnson “transparently declared the benefit in kind” of the luxury Caribbean holiday, and noted that Carphone Warehouse founder Mr Ross confirmed the declaration is “correct”.

The Prime Minister declared the trip with fiancee Carrie Symonds as a “benefit in kind” in the Register of Members’ Interests.

But the Mail said Ms Stone believes the break was worth more than twice the declared £15,000.

Mr Johnson was said to have refused to accept the ruling and is trying to have it overturned to avoid the risk of being suspended as an MP.

A Downing Street spokesman said: “The PM transparently declared the benefit in kind in the Commons Register of Interests. The Cabinet Office was aware of the declaration and was content it was appropriate.

“A spokesman for Mr Ross confirmed the PM’s declaration is correct and the accommodation was facilitated as a donation in kind.”

This week a spokesman for Mr Ross, who owns a villa on the island, said in a statement: “Mr Ross facilitated accommodation for Mr Johnson on Mustique valued at £15,000.

“Therefore this is a benefit in kind from Mr Ross to Mr Johnson, and Mr Johnson’s declaration to the House of Commons is correct.”

Reflections on Democracy

From a correspondent –

There is a certain amount of empathy for those East Devon political representatives who lost their opportunities to win a Devon County seat at the recent elections, given the numbers of votes cast for non-Tory candidates and whose success was, no doubt, scuppered by the eccentricities of local ward boundaries and the triumph of the nationwide Tory- led vaccination programme.

The sense of betrayal and disappointment experienced by various local Independent politicians is palpable from reading recent comments in the media:-

 . . . .“democracy is not quite what we all think” observed East Devon Leader – Paul Arnott

and

. . .  “I lost by 145 votes . . . .  despite the fact that the original Lib Dem candidate for Seaton contacted me to offer a deal where she would stand down in return for a joint public statement” – remarked Martin Shaw, after failing to secure the County seat of Seaton and Colyton. He continued by highlighting “exactly the same thing happened to the Independent EDA candidate Paul Hayward in Axminster” when he also lost that County seat by a fine margin of votes.

A similar betrayal and disappointment was also experienced in December 2020 by around 200 members of the electorate who asked for representation from their elected members on the East Devon Planning Committee to control inappropriate development within a major Planning Application (20/1001/MOUT) at Winslade Park, Clyst St Mary.

After recommendations, from the Development Manager, to build, build, build and to ignore planning policies in the Local and Neighbourhood Plans that directed development away from green fields and flood zones, incorporated quality designs and avoided traffic congestion/pollution in a village community – the politicians decided to seize the offer from  developers for a  ‘pot of gold’  which resulted in them supporting and giving substantial weight to the economic benefits which (they considered) outweighed the 200 pleas for a balanced, innovative development that would not obliterate the environmental, natural amenities within a small, rural village.

The pandemic has accentuated the importance of the benefits of green spaces and open landscapes that are in short supply in many, large, urban communities- but this must not result in a handful of small East Devon villages being sacrificed to achieve extravagant housing targets! Surely, all East Devon local communities should share proportionate growth to avoid excessive growth saturation of a few? To step beyond the point that is necessary or desirable is folly and results is the ruination of valued natural assets that cannot be replaced!

Pinhoe, Broadclyst and surrounding communities have been bombarded with excessive development that has impacted on their local amenity and character and many believe they are an example of how not to develop East Devon, when those communities were assured that the provision of the new town of Cranbrook would protect the surrounding smaller villages from over-development!

Consequently, it is no surprise that Henry Gent was successful for the Green Party in the Broadclyst County seat (even though his ‘green’ policies of passivhaus development and organic farming are questionably ‘at odds’ with having optioned a large area of his land to major developers) but hopefully such views on building on green fields do not transfer to other small, historic, rural East Devon communities morphing them into large towns!

Clyst St Mary would be negligent if they failed to warn their neighbours in Colyton that submitting proposals in Neighbourhood Plans to East Devon District Council will not always guarantee that residents’ comments and views for the future of their community will be heard, listened to or, indeed, implemented at all by either the planners or politicians of the day!

There is certainly an area of risk involved where major development is concerned,  leaving many to place their bets on the planning roulette table with a choice between ‘Green’ and ‘Greed’ and usually there is only one winner!

From 1549 and 1685 both Clyst St Mary (Prayer Book Rebellion) and Colyton respectively have a history of being rebellious and it is agreed that, all these centuries later, both communities will continue to rebel against any future unwanted development. Both communities value their historic links believing that the individual attributes that contribute to making our communities different and special must be protected and enhanced and any change must be sensitively planned and we trust that our elected representatives will follow those principles.

The good news is that any disappointment experienced recently by local politicians is relatively short-lived, being cushioned by the fact that in four years, there will be another opportunity to be elected.

However, the bad news is that if major planning decisions for the development of local communities are flawed –  the detrimental effects last several lifetimes at best and at worst they will last in perpetuity!

‘An opportunity to be the voice of your community’ on Devon’s response to the climate emergency

Fourteen thousand randomly selected Devon households are being invited to enter a ‘civic lottery’ to determine who represents the county at this summer’s online Devon Climate Assembly.

Philippa Davies sidmouth.nub.news 

‘An opportunity to be the voice of your community’ on Devon's response to the climate emergency

Over the next week invitations will drop through letterboxes giving households the chance to help shape and safeguard Devon’s future.

It follows the recent public consultation of the Interim Devon Carbon Plan, the county’s climate roadmap which outlines what every resident, business and organisation will have to do to reduce carbon emissions.

The Interim Carbon Plan is being developed by the Devon Climate Emergency Response Group (DCERG) – a partnership of Devon’s councils, emergency services, voluntary organisations, and business groups. The group has set a target for Devon to be carbon-neutral no later than 2050.

Hundreds have contributed to the plan’s development; however some of the issues that need to be solved are so significant they need further discussion – and it’s these that will be considered, discussed, and voted on by the Assembly.

How can we be sure the Assembly is truly representative of Devon’s people?

To conduct the Devon Climate Assembly, DCERG has enlisted advice and support from two of the UK’s leading experts.

The Involve Foundation and the Sortition Foundation have conducted Citizens’ Assemblies on behalf of the UK Government and Scottish Parliament. Their approach in Devon will ensure that the make-up of the 70-strong Devon Climate Assembly is fair and representative of the population.

The first stage in selecting Assembly members is a ‘civic lottery’, which involves invitations being sent out to randomly selected households in Devon, Plymouth, and Torbay, inviting one member of that household to put their name forward.

Households that receive an invitation have until Monday, May 24 to respond. From those responses, 70 members will be hand-picked against a criterion that will reflect Devon’s demographic profile.

Age, gender, ethnicity, disability, geography, socio-economic status, and people’s own attitude towards climate change are all factors that will be used to produce a representative Assembly.

The Assembly itself will be conducted entirely online, and no prior knowledge of climate change or digital skills are needed. Digital devices and support will be available.

Members will meet over a series of weekday evenings and three weekends in June and July to hear from a range of expert speakers, discuss the issues and form recommendations decided on by a vote.

The Devon Climate Emergency partnership, which includes all Devon’s Local Authorities, will respond to each of the Assembly’s recommendations to complete the Devon Carbon Plan.

Professor Patrick Devine Wright, Chair of the Net-Zero Task Force, who will combine the Assembly’s recommendations into the Devon Carbon Plan, said: “This is a fantastic opportunity for individuals to be the voice of their communities and advise the Net-Zero Task Force as to how they think Devon should meet the particularly challenging issues of climate change.”

Dr Phil Norrey, chair of DCERG and Chief Executive of Devon County Council, said: “I would like to thank the members of the Devon Climate Emergency Response Group and the Net-Zero Taskforce for their hard work and to members of the public who have helped shape the carbon plan right from the thematic hearings through to the recent public consultation.

“Devon’s Climate Assembly is the next stage of a transparent and democratic process to show us all how we can live and prosper in a carbon neutral society.

“This is the goal of Devon’s Carbon Plan, to set out a clear roadmap of what we all have to do to ensure that Devon becomes net-zero and continues to thrive. If over the next week or so you receive an invitation, I encourage you to respond.”

For more information, visit the Devon Climate Emergency Citizens Assembly website.

Michael Caines’ new beach bar has £75 cancellation fee

Exmouth’s highly anticipated waterfront restaurant Mickeys Beach Bar and Restaurant is set to open on Monday, May 17, and people far and wide are excited to visit.

Chloe Parkman www.devonlive.com

Mickeys Beach Bar and Restaurant – owned by celebrity chef Michael Caines – is set to serve some of the finest food and drink in East Devon whilst overlooking Exmouth’s stunning beach.

But for those who leave it until the last day to cancel their reservation, you’ll face an eye watering fine.

The cancellation fee within 24 hours of a booking is £75 for dinner and £40 for lunch.

A spokesperson for the venue said: ”Many restaurants now operate with a deposit policy or ticketing system – asking for full payment at the time of booking in order to generate revenue to cover the costs of rent, rising business rates, insurance, staff, produce etc, but that’s not the right answer for us here as we’re more community-focused.

”Instead, we have a simple, fair and upfront cancellation policy – it only applies if there’s less than 24 hours notice and the fee varies accordingly with lunch (£40) and dinner (£75) reservations.

”Cancel for free just by giving more than 24hrs notice prior to your reservation.

”Plans change, people forget to cancel, diners book multiple options, and emergencies happen – we get it, but cancellations are an annoying reality!”

Although it doesn’t happen everyday, no shows and cancellations are inevitable in the hospitality industry.

A spokesperson for Mickey’s adds: ”The average no show rate alone is anywhere between ten to twenty per cent of a restaurants’ covers. It’s estimated that it costs the UK’s restaurants £16 billion per year.

”With cancellations on top of that, this can be devastating to a restaurant, especially independents and new launches.

”A survey that went out last year found that 27% don’t cancel because they can’t be bothered and 9% don’t cancel because they book several restaurants and decide which they’ll attend nearer to the time.

”A cancellation fee is a nod to our customers that we take their reservations seriously and vice versa that they take our business seriously. It also ensures we have reservations from people who really do want to dine with us. This in turn makes sure that we’re fully booked, that the ambience is just right, the waitlist is kept to a minimum and the number of diners enjoying their experience at a maximum.

”We’ve spent a lot of time researching and asking our guests for their feedback on our policies and the majority wholeheartedly approve of a cancellation fee! They, like us, support the #NoMoreNoShows movement.

”Why is that? Simple – people don’t like to dine in a half-empty restaurant or wait months for a table because it’s been rife with no shows. Guests like the atmosphere to be buzzing, fun, and filled with other people enjoying the experience too. They want a memorable visit.”

While talking about Michael Caines:

In a post in February, Owl also noted that Lympstone manor has opened five indulgent Shepherd huts – complete with outdoor hot tubs, rolltop baths and walk-in showers,  www.exmouthjournal.co.uk but so far had been unable to find a related planning permission for these structures in the curtilage of a listed building.

There is a form of ‘permitted development’ allowing land to be used without planning permission ‘for any purpose for not more than 28 (now 56) days in total in any calendar year. (Now being used for pop-up glamping sites). Although Owl is unclear as to whether this applies in designated landscapes.

Earlier this week Owl posted this retrospective application appearing in the EDDC planning list:

Siting of six shepherds huts with external decking, 3 boiler houses/log stores, one with decking area, and associated infrastructure (retrospective application) Lympstone Manor Hotel Courtlands Lane Exmouth EX8 3NZRef. No: 21/0751/FUL | Validated: Mon 26 Apr 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision

Developers who fail to build new homes face ‘use it or lose it’ tax

Developers will face new “use it or lose it” taxes for failing to build homes on land that already has planning permission amid concerns that more than 1.1 million have been left unbuilt in the past ten years.

[So who is going to be lobbying against this? – Please form an orderly queue. Owl]

George Grylls, www.thetimes.co.uk

Robert Jenrick, the housing secretary, is considering the levy as the government oversees the biggest shake-up of the planning system for 70 years.

About 2.8 million homes have been given the green light for construction since 2010-11, but only 1.6 million have been built, according to analysis by the Local Government Association (LGA).

Critics have claimed that such “land banking” has artificially kept house prices high and deprived first-time buyers of the chance to get on the property ladder. Housebuilders have rejected this analysis, and dismissed land banking as a myth.

Ministers are privately considering different ways to encourage higher rates of building. Under one proposal housebuilders would pay full council tax on all the properties in a project from one to two years after securing planning permission, regardless of whether they have been built.

There has been a backlash from Tory MPs over Jenrick’s proposals to deregulate the planning system, with backbenchers in traditional Tory southern seats angered that existing homeowners will no longer be able to object to individual planning applications.

The Planning Bill, introduced in this week’s Queen’s Speech, will designate land for growth or protection. Applications for homes in growth areas will automatically get a green light, while developments in protection areas will face greater challenges. A third regeneration zone is still under consideration.

The new taxes will go some way to appeasing Tory backbenchers, some of whom have privately attacked the government’s Planning Bill as a “developers’ charter”.

This week Lady May, the former prime minister, defended the planning system in a speech to the Commons and urged reform of the housebuilding sector instead. “I fear that, unless the government look again at the white paper proposals, what we will see is not more homes but, potentially, the wrong homes being built in the wrong places,” she said.

“Underpinning the proposals seems to be the concept that the reason more homes are not being built is the planning system. In fact, the last figure I saw from the Local Government Association showed that one million homes have been given planning permission but have yet to be built, so the issue is not just about the planning system.”

About nine in ten applications are granted planning permission and local authorities approve double the number of homes as ten years ago, according to the LGA. David Renard, its housing spokesman, said: “By giving councils the right powers to incentivise developers to get building once planning permission has been granted, we can go further and faster. Councils are granting permission for hundreds of thousands of homes but families who desperately need housing cannot live in a planning permission.”

CPRE, the countryside charity formerly known as the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England, has previously demanded levies on developers who fail to build. Tom Fyans, campaigns and policy director, said: “In the eye of an affordable housing crisis we need a ‘use it or lose it’ approach. The countryside is central in our response to the climate and nature emergencies and we simply can’t afford to keep releasing more and more land unnecessarily for speculative development.”

Straitgate Farm quarry application “final submission of additional information” sneaks in “under Owl’s radar”.

The Straitgate Farm quarry planning application for:

“Extraction of up to 1.5 million tonnes of as raised sand and gravel, restoration to agricultural land together with temporary change of use of a residential dwelling to a quarry office/welfare facility” 

was considered by DCC in 2017 who requested additional information, with a published consultation expiry date of 16/05/21. 

Aggregate Industries have now lodged information (see below) but from what Owl gleans from the excellent Straitgate Action Group blog, this fails to address all the issues and leaves little time for detailed comment.

Owl has received correspondence expressing concern over the lack of publicity on this new information e.g. within Ottery St Mary Town Council; and clarity with regard to opportunity to comment on the details. The Action Group Blog indicates the need for both further information and a formal consultation.

To be on the safe side Owl suggests concerned residents immediately lodge a comment with DCC regarding the inadequacy of the “final” submission and the need for further formal consultation.

Contact details are in last paragraph below, reference DCC/3944/2017. A full list of correspondence (most dating from 2017) can be found here. (You may need to “accept” privacy statement and conditions, before automatic transfer to the application page, then click on “associated documents”. This link can also be used for submitting comments)

AI’s “final submission of additional information” prompts another consultation

straitgateactiongroup.blogspot.com 

On 5 March 2021, Aggregate Industries lodged what it called its “final submission of additional information” in respect of planning application DCC/3944/2017 to quarry Straitgate Farm, saying: 

We would now ask that our application is progressed to the next available committee and confirm our agreement to a time extension until the 31st July 2021 in order to achieve this.   

This additional information was originally requested almost 4 years ago, but seemingly it still didn’t tick all the boxes that Devon County Council had wanted. On 11 March 2021, Devon County Council wrote back to Aggregate Industries saying: 

Additional information is required to determine the associated application at Straitgate Farm reference DCC/3944/2017… I am writing to ask you to formally agree to extend the period for the determination of your application until 30 September 2021. You have indicated this will give you adequate time. 

Despite the above, no further information has been provided beyond that final submission. 

On 7 April 2021, Aggregate Industries wrote to Devon County Council again, this time saying:

We would now ask that our application is progressed to the next available committee and confirm our agreement to a time extension until the 30th September 2021 in order to achieve this.    

Devon County Council has now started a new 30-day public consultation on this application and also DCC/3945/2017 which seeks to import the as-dug sand and gravel from Straitgate Farm into Hillhead Quarry near Uffculme for processing – a 2.5 million-mile operation. 

How the public are supposed to wade through the disparate collection of documents and muddle is anybody’s guess. You might have hoped – in all the intervening years – that Aggregate Industries would have done some serious thinking about this application, that it would have all its ducks aligned. But no. This final submission contains the normal assortment of nonsense, omissions, falsity and contradictions.

We therefore conclude that any increase in animal or farm traffic crossing this road is a direct consequence of the current planning application and needs to be assessed as a part of the highways impacts.

Remarkably, but tellingly, no assessment has been lodged on what impact 150 cows crossing four times daily would have on the functioning of the main road into and out of Ottery St Mary. The application lodged with East Devon District Council to facilitate such a crossing remains undetermined.

The final submission supplied by Aggregate Industries includes: 

LANDSCAPE & SOILS: Set of revised plans to accompany above report, which supersede the previously submitted versions of all the following plans 

CLIMATE CHANGE: Greenhouse Gas Assessment of the Proposed Quarry at Straitgate Farm, Centre for Energy and the Environment, Exeter University, March 2021 

RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: Straitgate Quarry (Prospect): Resource Assessment, February 2021. 

Comments on this final submission, or any other part of the applications, should be made to Devon County Council, either online or by email to planning@devon.gov.uk including name, address and the reference numbers above.

Breaking news: GWR has a recovery plan but no timetable

After five days we now have a “service recovery plan” to restore rail services!

[One more to add to the list of “recovery plans” – Owl]

Trains that were taken out of service after cracks were found will be reintroduced after “rigorous safety checks”, the Rail Delivery Group says.

BBC News www.bbc.co.uk

The industry body said Great Western Railway and London North Eastern Railway (LNER) will ramp-up services.

There has been disruption for passengers since Saturday after small cracks were discovered on the base frame of some Hitachi Class 800 trains.

The rail minister warned passengers to expect disruption for “some time”.

Travellers are being advised to continue to check with their operator before they travel.

In a statement, the Rail Delivery Group said Hitachi Rail, train operators and the government have agreed a “service recovery plan” to reintroduce more Class 800 and 385 trains after they were taken out of service on Saturday.

But it said trains on some routes may be less frequent than usual and train availability could vary.

The industry has put in place “suitable criteria for the trains to meet before they can re-enter service”, the Rail Delivery Group said.

Rail Minister Chris Heaton-Harris said he welcomed the news that “many trains” can return following safety checks.

“Trains should begin to return to service after further inspections have been carried out, helping to safely restore the reliable and punctual services on GWR and LNER that passengers deserve,” he said.

“Safety is our absolute focus, which is why Hitachi will carry out a comprehensive daily testing regime on affected trains.”

He said the “next step” will be for Hitachi to present its long-term repair plan for the fleet, which he expects “shortly”.

“Whilst this long-term fix can partly be incorporated into the regular service pattern for these trains, we do expect disruption to services for some time to come, but hope passengers understand this work is essential to ensure these issues do not occur again,” Mr Heaton-Harris said.

With only 43% of the vote the Tories swept the board in East Devon – a fair win?

Clearly we need a more representative voting system, but what can we do about it?

A view from East Devon Council leader Paul Arnott published in Exmouth Journal (and elsewhere)

So, good people of East Devon, this week I would like to set you an exam question?

Q: In last week’s County Council elections, Conservative candidates in our district polled a total of 22,265 votes across all 12 wards, and non-Conservatives polled a total of 29,654. The question is, how many non-Conservative councillors for the available 12 slots will now be sitting at County?

Even allowing for what one might imagine about the eccentricities of our electoral system, with its odd historical boundaries and so forth, you might guess that the Conservative representation would be perhaps 5, with the non-Tories being 7. Something like that.

In fact, I can report to you that the Conservatives now hold 10 seats at Devon county from our area, and the non-Conservatives just 2. This has caused blood to boil in some quarters, and I can understand that. But in my position, as leader of the Independent East Devon Alliance, I want to move on to the ‘what can we do about it?’ phase as soon as possible and beyond the anger.

To explain, as a small local registered political party we played nice. Where we were not sure that we were the most likely candidate to challenge the Conservatives we simply did not stand. But the Labour Party did and I believe they took a small but highly significant part of the non-Conservative vote, and our three lost by one or two hundred votes in all three wards.

Now, I feel really bad pointing this out. Those young candidates have every right to stand for what they want, where they want, and when they want, and I applaud their enthusiasm to enter politics. But this is local politics. This is the problem with democracy; it is not quite what we all think. It has been reported last weekend that in the coming weeks Home Secretary Priti Patel will change the way in which mayors for major cities and areas are elected.

The Conservatives don’t like the current system, where voters may express a first and a second preference. It’s fair and ensures that a perhaps divisive candidate of one party does not get in with just 40% if their two rivals have polled 30% each. The Conservatives fancy that as long as they can find a series of Borises, big characters who can attract a popular if not always well-informed vote, they can make a clean sweep of mayoral elections next time on the old past past the post system. That may be alright for national hunt horseracing, but it is no way to encourage true democracy in the 21st century. But doubtless it will sweep through Parliament. No more first and second preferences, a democratic reversal

Now, I must presume that about 45% of the readers of this column are Conservative voters – well, some of my best friends are Tories, even my son’s godfather (a former Winchester councillor). So I’m not doing you down; I am just pointing out that the best of you I suspect will agree that the representation we need on councils or at government level should reflect the numbers of votes cast, not the eccentricities of ward boundaries etc. But the real challenge is to those who do not wish to vote Conservative. Please look at those figures again. Nearly 30,000 of you voted non Tory, for 2 county seats. Just over 22,000 voted Tory for 10 county seats. So what are we, what are you, going to do about it?

Sidmouth elects three new town councillors

Three new town councillors have been elected in Sidmouth.

Philippa Davies sidmouth.nub.news

Following the vote last Thursday, Richard Thurlow has been elected to the Salcombe Regis ward.

There were two seats vacant in the Sidmouth South ward, and they have been filled by Hilary Nelson and Rachel Perram.

All three of the new councillors are Independents.

GWR situation is “shambles” says Exeter MP

After the best part of a week, GWR services from London to the south west are still are not running, following safety concerns about new trains.

Radio Exe www.radioexe.co.uk  

The Hitachi engines were introduced with much fanfare in 2018, but after small cracks were found in them, they’re being checked to see what precautions need to be taken to protect passengers.

Major disruption is the result. GWR is advising people to put off their journeys to a later date, in the hope they’ll be able to sort things out. In the meantime. they’re operating some separate shuttles in place of the fast service. It means previous direct trips may now need several changes.

Exeter MP Ben Bradshaw, who sits on the transport committee in parliament, describes the situation as “a shambles.” Whilst safety is paramount, he says: “so is getting around the country when you want to see loved ones you haven’t seen for more than a year. There will be many people in the south west who will have made plans for next week so it needs to be sorted out as quickly as possible.”

The ‘Super Express’ trains were introduced to take advantage of electrification of the Great Western railwayline, but that’s not coming to the south west any time soon. They were late going into service after being announced. According to Private Eye, the 866 carriages being used nationally are costing £7.7 billion in ‘train usage prices’ over nearly 30 years.

David Cameron bombarded ministers with texts and calls over ‘bonkers’ Greensill decision

David Cameron bombarded government ministers and officials with scores of texts, calls and emails over a four-month period, telling them that the failure to provide financial support to Greensill Capital was “nuts” and “bonkers”, it has been revealed.

www.independent.co.uk 

A cache of messages released by the House of Commons Treasury Committee showed that the former prime minister and his office contacted ministers including chancellor Rishi Sunak – as well as senior officials at 10 Downing Street and the Bank of England – on 27 separate days between 5 March and 26 June 2020, with multiple contacts on some days.

And Mr Cameron’s messages also revealed efforts to lobby Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Michael Gove. But there was little indication that Gove – a former close friend who fell out with the ex-PM over Brexit – gave much of a response to his contacts.

Meanwhile, it was revealed that Mr Cameron will face two grillings from panels of senior MPs on Thursday this week, facing the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee at 5pm, just after concluding a previously-announced interrogation by the Treasury committee at 2.30pm.

Signing his messages “Dc” or “De”, the ex-PM begins with requests for talks and offers of lunch, but the pleas for help become increasingly lengthy and detailed after it was made clear that Greensill’s application for inclusion in the multi-billion pound Covid Corporate Financing Facility had been rejected.

In all, at least 25 texts, 12 WhatsApp messages and eight emails were sent, and 11 calls are recorded in a timeline supplied by Mr Cameron to the committee, which is conducting an investigation into the affair with company founder Lex Greensill giving evidence this afternoon.

At one point, Cameron tells the Treasury’s top civil servant Tom Scholar he will “see you with Rishi’s for an elbow bump or foot tap”, as he assures him that Greensill are eager to “help” with the government’s response to the Covid crisis.

As the decision on CCFF got nearer, Cameron became more persistent, at one stage even telling Scholar: “One last point, then I promise I will stop annoying you”.

After the application was refused, he stepped up his contacts, telling the Treasury permanent secretary on 3 April he was “genuinely baffled” by the decision and asking for a phone discussion on what he said was a “bonkers” decision.

(Gov.UK)

The same day, he texted Sunak himself to brand the Treasury decision “nuts” and asking him to “call any time on this number”. 

He also fired off texts and emails to Treasury ministers Jesse Norman and John Glen, as well as 10 Downing Street special adviser Sheridan Westlake, who he told there was “a looming problem you can help solve”.

And he emailed the deputy governor of the Bank of England Sir Jon Cunliffe, telling him Greensill had been rejected despite having “dealt with every objection”, and adding: “I think I must be missing something here, Am obviously talking to HMT but would be grateful for any light you could shed on this.”

In a text that day to Gove, Cameron wrote: “I know you are manically busy – and doing a great job by the way (this is bloody hard and I think the team is coping extremely well). But do you have a moment for a word? I am on this number and v free. All good wishes De.”

Follow-up emails showed that Mr Cameron spoke with Mr Norman and Mr Westlake that day. And he texted Mr Sunak to say he looked forward to speaking the next morning.

After speaking to the Chancellor on 4 April, Mr Cameron was pushing for more meetings for himself and Lex Greensill, which took place later that week.

(Gov.UK)

After amendments were made to Greensill’s proposals, Cameron texted Sunak again on 22 April, urging him to “give it another nudge over the finish line” and insisting it was “clearly in the national interest.”

Over the following weeks, he was repeatedly in touch with the chancellor by text message, assuring him on 23 April that “goodwill and common sense can fix this” and thanking him on 29 April for “huge progress” which he suggested meant that supply chain finance suppliers like Greensill could be included in the facility.

By 15 May, he was telling Mr Sunak “think we are there” and adding: “Happy to talk any time, but hope this can now get the green light!”

The messages also reveal that in June, Mr Cameron contacted both Mr Sunak and vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi pressing for the maximum loan Greensill could make under the Treasury’s CBILs scheme to be increased from £50m to £200m, describing the difference as “rather crucial”.

The contact came to an end on 26 June with a text to Mr Glen stating: “Thanks for your help with this. Sorry the answer is a No, but we appreciate the engagement. All good wishes. De.”

Johnson’s planning laws an ‘utter disaster’, say countryside campaigners

A dramatic loosening of planning laws to create a housebuilding boom will damage local democracy and destroy swathes of countryside by granting property developers a freer hand to build over green fields, planning experts have warned.

[Likely to prove controversial with backbenchers with backbone – would that include Jupp and Parish? – Owl]

Robert Booth www.theguardian.com 

The new laws, part of the government’s “Project Speed” to accelerate infrastructure projects, are intended to increase the number of homes being planned by more than a third, and were announced in the Queen’s speech. But critics described them as “an utter disaster” which would return the country to “a deregulated dark age of development”.

Ministers are expected to enact a radical shift in the way decisions are made on new developments by zoning land either for growth, where developers will be allowed to build homes and related infrastructure such as schools and hospitals without individual planning consents, or protection where development will be restricted.

It wants to boost home ownership in areas of increasing Conservative support in northern England and the Midlands and will use post-Brexit freedoms to “simplify … environmental assessments for developments”.

It said there will be stronger rules on design – but countryside campaigners warned the changes would lead to the “suburbanisation” of the countryside and “rural sprawl” without delivering much-needed affordable housing.

The councils body the Local Government Information Unit said the changes would “leave local government with the political liability on planning whilst depriving them … of the powers to manage it effectively”.

The Queen’s speech did not include a bill to improve regulation of social housing despite a government white paper last year. Grenfell United, which represents the bereaved and survivors of the 2017 council block disaster, said it was “deeply let down” at the failure to “redress the balance of power between social housing tenants and landlords”.

Plans to reform leaseholds went as far as a new bill so leaseholders of new, long residential leases cannot be charged a financial ground rent for no tangible service. But there was no plan for helping current leaseholders pay up to £10bn in fire safety costs from faults discovered after Grenfell.

Announcing a planning bill that is expected to be the most radical since the 1948 Town and Country Planning Act, the government promised “simpler, faster procedures for producing local development plans, approving major schemes, assessing environmental impacts and negotiating affordable housing and infrastructure contributions”.

But Fiona Howie, the chief executive of the Town and Country Planning Association, said: “It is disappointing that the government’s narrative has focused, once again, solely on housing numbers. If we are truly committed to building back better, we need the built environment to support communities to thrive.”

She also said the bill must “ensure planning radically reduces our carbon emissions”, describing the legislation as the “last chance”.

The moves were described as an “utter disaster” by the Lancashire, Liverpool city region and Greater Manchester branch of the CPRE charity, which lobbies to protect the countryside.

“We will see a lot more houses on greenfield land and in areas of outstanding natural beauty,” said Debra McConnell, the chair of the branch. “The people in the north of England need these green spaces for their wellbeing.”

The CPRE also warned the bill, which will largely apply only in England, ran counter to the proposed environmental bill and would “take us back to a deregulated dark age of development”. It fears most of the new homes are unlikely to be low-cost or affordable.