Tendring council will charge elderly people who fall £26 to pick them up

The proposal by Tendring District Council, Essex, would affect some 3,000 elderly and vulnerable residents who pay for its Careline service, which helps users live independently at home.

Pensioners who need help getting to their feet after a fall will be charged a £26 call-out fee as part of planned cost-cutting measures.

The proposal by Tendring District Council, Essex, would affect some 3,000 elderly and vulnerable residents who currently pay for its Careline service, which helps users live independently at home.

Among the technology offered by Careline is a pendant which allows the wearer to send out a distress signal to a call centre in case of a fall or other minor emergency.
The Careline service currently costs £21.60-a-month but the council is planning to introduce an additional £25.92 charge in the event that a worker is called out to pick up someone after a fall.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3364544/Pensioners-trip-fall-home-charged-26-local-council-come-pick-again.html

“As a young person of Exmouth, I feel misled and horrified …”

image

So said the Exmouth College student who questioned EDDC leaders last night (16 Dec,2015), about the process behind the seafront development proposals in her town. But Deputy CEO Richard Cohen’s answer skirted around her main point (“I feel misled”), in a Full Council meeting that showed EDDC manipulative management at its very worst.

Blind block-voting without debate; and a Chair who allowed 5 serious questions from Exmouth residents to be rolled into one by the responding officer, thus enabling central points made by the speakers to be glossed over or, (as with the offer by Louise McAllister, specialist in surveys, to meet EDDC), simply ignored.

Not a single question was asked by any Majority Party councillor: only one of the 9 questions put, all from Independents, had a satisfactory answer (given thoroughly by Environment Portfolio holder, Cllr Iain Chubb).

Corporate Services portfolio holder, Cllr Phil Twiss, was unavailable to answer embarrassing questions about broadband, leaving Cllr Ian Thomas apologetically unable to provide informed replies.

The meeting reached a crescendo of ‘confidentiality’, when the critical information needed by councillors before deciding whether to give Leader Paul Diviani ‘delegated powers’ regarding the multi-million pound Heart of the South West (HotSW) devolution bid, was declared (without debate) too sensitive for press and public. So the devolution item was dealt with in private, at the end of the session.

Just a few minutes into this part of the agenda, the Chair, Cllr Stuart Hughes, closed the meeting, somewhat prematurely perhaps. There had been no discussion by councillors, and the whole point of this session had been missed: there was no vote on delegated powers for the Leader.

EDDC quietly drops the “eco town” from Cranbrook in Draft Local Plan

According to the front page of this month’s Cranbrook Herald, the lead story is that EDDC has dropped the words that it is built ton”eco-town standards” when describing Cranbrook in the draft Local Plan.

http://www.cranbrookherald.com
(e-edition)

The town council agrees, saying that the phrase cannot apply when EDDC is “downgrading future environmental requirements for the town”.

It is apparently now being described as a “modern market town”.

Hhhmmm …

Osborne gives his image adviser 42% pay rise

“The disclosure comes in data that shows the bill for special advisers across government has risen to £9.2m in 2014-2015, up from £8.4m over the previous year.

In July, the chancellor told thousands of teachers, nurses, police, firefighters and civil servants that they would face another four-year pay freeze at 1% a year, as part of planned savings worth £17bn. Many more jobs are also set to be lost across the public sector.

The increasing use of public money to fund the chancellor’s office, where he now has 10 advisers, will anger many public-sector workers. The increase in money spent on special advisers is especially embarrassing for David Cameron because of previous pledges to cut the cost of government and the number of special advisers.

The increase in money spent on Osborne’s office will be seen as further evidence that he is seeking to increase his influence across Whitehall. Senior Tories believe he wishes to exert his influence as he seeks follow Cameron into the job of prime minister.

The data shows that Cameron has 32 advisers – six more than in November last year. Twenty-three are paid more than £63,000 a year. Topping the list are his head of communications, Craig Oliver, and chief of staff, Ed Llewellyn, who both earn £140,000.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/dec/17/osborne-hands-advisers-big-pay-rises-while-freezing-public-sector-wages

“Taking out the trash: how spin doctors wrangle the news”

“The final day the Commons sits before a Christmas or summer recess is always a busy day for political journalists – because of the large number of government announcements that are made at those times. But on Thursday there were 36 written statements from ministers. And, according to the gov.uk website, departments put out 424 publications on this day.

There were two important announcements, on local government spending and Lords reform, accompanied by oral statements to the Commons. And the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission, an important government quango, published its annual report, among plenty more reports and documents issued.

At Westminster this is known as “burying bad news” or, after the same practice featured in an episode of West Wing “taking out the trash” day.

Government spin doctors know that if they release a vast amount of potentially embarrassing news on the same day they will limit negative publicity. In an ideal world the No 10 communications chief would also arrange for someone like José Mourinho to get sacked, but there are limits to the powers of Craig Oliver and so it’s best to put that one down to luck.

Some of the information released today came under the heading of “transparency” and Matthew Hancock, the Cabinet Office minister, said in a statement that “enhancing transparency and accountability continues to be at the heart of our approach to government”.

That is hard to square with an approach to news management that seems intended to minimise scrutiny. The prime minister’s spokesman claimed the government was having to put out so much news today because it had “a big agenda”.

Announcements are made on the day before recess because many ministerial declarations have to be made to parliament. Many of the items released today are genuinely awkward or embarrassing for ministers. But others are more innocuous, and they may have been held back not as part of a cover-up but simply through inertia and Whitehall’s ingrained reluctance to release information.

We have not read all 424 documents published today. But here are 30 of the announcements that have appeared, which the government seem to want you to overlook.

1 – A local government spending settlement involving cuts worth billions

2 – A report from the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission saying Britain is on track to becoming ever more divided

3 – A long-delayed report into the Muslim Brotherhood whose conclusions may disappoint allies like Saudi Arabia

4 – The list of government special advisers, and figures showing how much they are paid

5- The list of ministerial interests

6 – Information about David Cameron’s ministerial gifts, hospitality, travel and meetings

7 – A list of receptions held at Downing Street

8 – A list of government officials earning more than £150,000

9 – A report from the independent chief inspector of borders and immigration saying the authorities have lost contact with around 10,000 asylum seekers

10 – A plan to curb the powers of the House of Lords that has been criticised by opposition parties and by constitutional reformers

11 – Cuts to solar panel subsidies

12 – Homelessness figures showing a 45% increase in the number of families living in emergency B&Bs

13 – An official Department for Work and Pensions report on the bedroom tax saying that three-quarters of those affected have cut back on food and that the impact on downsizing has been limited

14 – A Home Office review saying the government should abandon its policy of having tied visas for overseas domestic workers

15 – An air quality action plan that has been criticised as too lax by environmental campaigners

16 – A report into failings at the Southern Health NHS foundation trust

17 – A range of court fee increases

18 – A statement saying 177 service personnel are embedded with other nations’ armed forces

19 – Police funding figures for 2016-17

20 – Charts setting out how much money is spent on ministerial cars

21 – Suspension of a badger vaccination programme

22 – The allocation of onshore gas and oil exploration licences that would pave the way for fracking

23 – An evaluation of a pilot relating to the use of independent child trafficking advocates

24 – Data about the number of quangos funded by the government

25 – The government’s response to the Harris review on self-inflicted deaths in custody

26 – A report on the needs of ex-service personnel in the criminal justice system

27 – The government’s sports strategy

28 – A long-term walking and cycling investment strategy

29 – A consultation on reform on the Independent Police Complaints Commission

30 – A list of guests who have visited Chequers”

http://gu.com/p/4f797

Local Plan progress – is telepathy involved?

According to Great Leader Diviani’s Christmas message, he expects the latest version of the draft Local Plan to be adopted early next year.

But how does he know this?

According to the EDDC web page where ALL correspondence with Mr Thickett is supposed to be published:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/document-libraries/local-plan-documents/correspondence-between-council-and-inspector/

EDDC has not written to Mr Thickett since February 2015 and Mr Thickett has not replied since March 2015.

Special telepathy perhaps to which the public is not allowed access?

Affordable housing: the opposite side of the coin

“The government are planning an attack on the aspirations of thousands of young people and families who simply want a home to call their own.

Should the Conservatives proposed housing and planning bill become law then it risks not only delivering a hugely damaging impact on the amount of affordable housing in our communities, but also takes power away from local people and councils to deliver more in the future.

Around half of all affordable homes built in the last decade were funded through section 106 obligations – approximately 234,000 homes. At its peak under Labour, in 2008-9, this enabled over 32,000 homes to be built. The housing and planning bill is going to put a stop to that.

The government plan to set aside developers obligations under section 106 and instead legislate for the provision of so called ‘starter homes’ – to be sold at 80 per cent of full market rate.

The Conservatives are trying to pass this off as providing affordable homes, but the fact is that in my own town of Dartford you would need to earn a salary of £52,000 to afford one of these misnamed ‘starter’ homes. They will be totally out of reach for many young people and families in the ward I represent and it is a similar story in many others across the country.

Starter homes will do nothing to help people already struggling to get on the housing ladder, and it reveals the truth about this government’s attitude towards people who simply aspire to get on and get on the first rung of the housing ladder – the Tories have nothing to say to you. Thousands of people risk being locked out of housing market.

Understandably, councillors across the country are hugely concerned, not only about the potential impact on the future of affordable housing in their local areas but also the fact that this bill takes power away from councils to act to stop the loss of affordable homes we are going to experience.

The government may talk about localism and devolution but their actions here are in total contradiction to their words. By handing a wide range of powers over planning back to the secretary of state they will weaken local government’s ability to provide the mix of housing local communities need and robs local people of their say in the planning process:

It means that the government can impose starter-home obligations on developers.

It means that the government can direct councils to change their local plan or even suspend it altogether.

It means the government can overrule council planning boards and grant planning permission directly – regardless of whether a new development is going to meet the housing needs of a local area – undermining the ability of local people to have a proper say about what happens in their area. …

.In my own council, the Conservatives used a closure motion to prevent a full debate taking place. When Conservative councils like Dartford are not prepared to defend their own government’s policy it tells you everything about what even the Tories in local government feel about what this bill is going to do to affordable housing provision in our communities. …”

Jonathan Hawkins, Labour, Dartford, Progress Online 17/12/15

Ethical standards in public life

Owl would add some of the comments from this report, but its blood pressure can’t cope … well, ok, maybe just one:

Question:
Evidence of internal control and accountability measures – what is the internal control environment for maintaining ethical behaviour and standards in the organisation?

Answer:
A suitable code of conduct – typically a series of Do’s and Don’ts, publicly available and adherence to the code monitored.

Identification of key indicators or measures of an ethical culture within the organisation and periodic reviews of their effectiveness.

Existence of and adherence to whistleblowing policy or speak up mechanisms, gifts and hospitality registers, anti-bribery and corruption, declarations of interests requirements, procedures for dealing with conflicts of interest, which are regularly reviewed.

Ethical risks captured and controlled in the risk management process and evidence they have been identified, assessed and where required mitigated.

Transparency and reporting arrangements which encourages “intelligent accountability” putting out good quality information in intelligible and adaptable formats creating a genuine dialogue with stakeholders.”

Click to access 6.1291_CO_LAL_Ethical_standards_of_public_life_report_Interactive__2_.pdf

Devolution: our fate decided in secret

Upgraded from comment to post:

What a pity that press and public were excluded from the Devolution debate at this evening’s Council meeting. This way of behaving by the majority Party really leads one to assume something nefarious is going on. Why oh why can’t the Tories have the courage to debate things openly? If they have to muzzle press comment and keep their electorate in ignorance of what they are deciding, is it any wonder that we doubt them?