“Come and meet Sir Hugo Swire MP on 29th Oct and Speak Up for the climate”

From Christian Aid – Ottery St Mary

“Dear friends,

Here are two important items of news that we thought you might like to know about concerning Ottery – an informal talk with Sir Hugo Swire at the next Community Market (29th October) and the latest update from campaigners regarding the proposed mineral extraction at Straitgate:

Informal conversation with Sir Hugo Swire MP, 11am on Sat 29th October in

The Institute, Yonder St, Ottery St Mary

Do you feel passionate about protecting all that we love from climate change? Do you want to see our elected MP Sir Hugo Swire take action on this issue? If your answer is yes, please come to an informal conversation with Sir Hugo Swire MP over a cup of tea/coffee and the WI’s fabulous cakes at
11am on Saturday 29th October in The Institute, Yonder St, Ottery – and visit Ottery’s dynamic Community Market at the same time. All are welcome!

The conversation with Sir Hugo has been organised by Christian Aid and is supported by the local branch of the Women’s Institute, Ottery St Mary United Reformed Church, and Sustainable Ottery. It is part of the national Speak Up for the Climate week of action promoted by The Climate Coalition:

http://www.theclimatecoalition.org

Officially the national week of action finished last Saturday with nearly 300 events taking place with local MPs all over the UK. Prime Minister Theresa May and Chancellor Philip Hammond were among the MPs who participated in local constituency events. A very constructive meeting was
also held with Ben Bradshaw MP in Exeter. In Ottery we thought it would be good to wait till our monthly Community Market (organised by the United Reformed Church) which typifies Ottery’s community spirit, our support for local produce and crafts, and our commitment to more sustainable shopping and living.

There is no strict agenda for this event. Christian Aid will briefly kick things off and ask Sir Hugo to press his government to draw up a national plan for reducing carbon emissions (in line with the Climate Change Act) –
as this is what The Climate Coalition has been calling for throughout the week of action nationally. After that, we will all be free to share with Sir Hugo our personal reasons for taking climate change seriously – and what we would like him to do about it, both locally and nationally. Some of us will be moved by the impact of climate change on the world’s poorest communities.

Others may want to talk about the impact on bees and other wildlife, our coastline, our farming, or our health. Some of us may be worried about floods in Ottery; others may be excited about the opportunities to scale up renewable energy or to promote cycling and cleaner transport. Whatever
climate change means for you, come and share it with your local MP on 29th October.

This is the start of a conversation with Sir Hugo which we hope will be ongoing over the coming years. And by the way, no technical knowledge of climate change science is required! If you know you can come, please contact
Helen Collinson:

helen.hcollinson90.freeserve.co.uk

(mob 0790 394 7782)

and please mention to her any issues or questions broadly related to climate change which you’d particularly like to raise with Sir Hugo. Alternatively, feel free to just turn up on the day!”

Straitgate quarry update

“This is just to let you know that the Inspector has now written his report for the Devon Minerals Plan. Straitgate is to remain in the new Plan, as a ‘Preferred Area’.

So, despite the Environment Agency’s recommendations, despite all your excellent letters submitted during the consultations, despite the fact that there is nowhere in the Plan for material from Straitgate to be processed, despite the fact that Aggregate Industries are struggling to find a suitable access to the proposed site, despite the fact that there are less than a million tonnes of sand and gravel available, the Inspector in his wisdom has concluded that Straitgate should be in the Plan.

Separately, AI continue to work on their plans for the site, albeit slowly. They have more or less ruled out Little Straitgate as a potential point of access and are now looking at Birdcage Lane onto the Exeter Road at the junction with Toadpit Lane.

They are also considering the possibility of quarrying Straitgate on a campaign-basis, spread over ten years. If they couldn’t process at Blackhill, they would apparently consider taking the material all the way to Hillhead at Uffculme, some 23 miles away.

For further information, see

http://www.straitgateactiongroup.blogspot.co.uk

http://www.straitgateactiongroup.blogspot.co.uk.

You can also read about the Minerals Plan decision on Claire’s blog:
http://www.clairewright.org/index.php/post/planning_inspector_endorses_straitgate_farm_for_quarrying_in_minerals_plan

http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/planning_inspector_endorses_straitgate_farm_for_quarrying_in_minerals_plan”

EDDC spends more than £ 700,000 on external legal advice in 3 years

Summary of request

I would like to know the amount of money the department spent on the services of external law firms and barristers for each of the last three years (years ending March 31). If this is not possible within the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act, two years of data will suffice.

Summary of response

2013/14 Legal fees including barristers £285,075.61
2014/15 Legal fees including barristers £353,060.78
2015/16 Legal fees including barristers £79,053.34

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/access-to-information/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-published-requests/

3 or maybe 4 or maybe 7 organisations and 2 or maybe 5 individuals decided how to spend £82,000 S106 in Seaton – you work it out!

Except when you read the answer to this FoI request, it is SO contradictory!

It says in one part 2 individuals and 7 organisations responded, then it says 5 individuals and 4 organisations responded – and then it names only 3 organisations!

Whatever – it was a couple of individuals, the town council and 2 sports clubs that made the decision. That’s public consultation EDDC style!

Section 106 publicising for Seaton in 2014

Date submitted: 27 September 2016

Summary of request

On your website you state:

‘In 2014 we gathered in ideas from the community on how £82,000 of section 106 money from new homes in Seaton should be spent. We received nine eligible, affordable and possible ideas from the community and from sporting organisations.’

I would be grateful if you would detail:

1. How the community were asked for ideas?
2. What organisations were asked for ideas?
3. How organisations were asked for ideas?
4. How many individuals responded?
5. How many organisations responded?
6. Of the nine eligible ideas, how many were from individuals and how many from organisations/representatives of organisations?
7. The names of the organisations whose ideas were deemed eligible
Summary of response

1. How the community were asked for ideas? – Through press releases sent out to all media contacts; through social media and the councils website; local Councillors and Seaton Town Council were involved and were asked to publicise the opportunity. Also e-mails were sent to several relevant local organisations we were aware of, we asked them to publicise the opportunity
2. What organisations were asked for ideas? – We do not have a record of this
3. How organisations were asked for ideas? – See answer to question 1
4. How many individuals responded? – 2
5. How many organisations responded? – 7
6. Of the nine eligible ideas, how many were from individuals and how many from organisations/representatives of organisations? – 5 were from individuals and 4 from organisations/representatives of organisations
7. The names of the organisations whose ideas were deemed eligible – Seaton Town Council; Seaton Cricket Club; Axe Valley Runners
Date responded: 4 October 2016

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/access-to-information/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-published-requests/

Hugo Swire, Pratts and Beefsteak

In days gone by (2006) when Hugo Swire was in opposition, debating funds for the BBC with the then Minister Tessa Jowell, a report by Simon Jenkins, political commentator:

” … Tessa Jowell has been lucky in her opponents. Yesterday she made a statement to the Commons about the new white paper on the BBC. …

… Then up sprang Ms Jowell’s opposite number, Hugo Swire, the Tory MP and a scion of – Eton! St Andrews! The Grenadier Guards! His clubs are White’s, Pratt’s and the Beefsteak. It seems unlikely that he dashes home from these establishments to catch EastEnders.

In our egalitarian times there are some MPs who would hesitate to mention all this, but Mr Swire is made of the stuff that built the Empire. Sadly his vocabulary is made from the stuff that built the Wobbly Bridge over the Thames. It shakes alarmingly, and is an object of scorn.

Why had the white paper had the same gestation time as an elephant? Why not? I thought. Would it have been preferable if it had the same gestation period as, say, a wombat? He swerved at a new metaphor. The paper was meant to be a springboard. “But it is not so much a launching pad as a holding pen!”

Nowadays, “is it credible to believe that a compulsory tax on the ownership of a television set [Mr Swire pronounces every single letter: ‘tell-eh-viss-ee-on’] is the right way to fund our national broadcaster?”

At this point a Labour MP, goaded beyond endurance, shouted “Drivel!” Mr Swire was undaunted. “Will the BBC Trust have the capacity to clip the wings of Auntie?” he asked, and we had a vision of the old lady rushing round while trustees, or perhaps Mr Swire himself, pursued her with shears.

He moved on to the notion of selling Britain abroad and to the British. “The chancellor wants to see a flagpole in every garden; is there now not a danger that this will be followed by a Union Jack on every TV aerial in the land?”

He might have got away with this, but he had to follow it by saying “Jesting apart!”

When did anyone last say that? That was jesting? Labour MPs laughed merrily. The BBC brass, sitting, anxious, in the gallery, began to relax.

“The bill for the BBC is higher than the GDP of Mongolia!” he announced, to tucks of laughter from almost everyone.

That’s not surprising. Mongolia is a very poor, yurt and yoghurt-intensive country. Britain is 20 times bigger, we live in houses, and can afford to eat mango flavoured yoghurt while watching our excellent TV service.”

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2006/mar/15/media.politicalcolumnists

How long do our MPs actually sit in the House of Commons?

Answer: not long at all. And MPs have no obligation to attend any sittings unless they are whipped to do so.

Mondays 2.30-10.30pm

Tuesdays and Wednesdays 11.30am-7.30pm

Thursdays 9.30am-5.30pm

Sitting Fridays 9.30am-3pm
(There are only 13 “sitting Fridays” in this Parliament)

Commons Hansard: Sittings of the House

http://www.parliament.uk/about/faqs/house-of-commons-faqs/business-faq-page/

MPs (such as Neil Parish) who sit on committees have slightly more work, though his committee has no current scheduled meetings arranged:

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environment-food-and-rural-affairs-committee/

If you want to see exactly what is happening day by day here is the daily diary of Parliamentary activities:

http://calendar.parliament.uk/

The website of the Conservative Middle East Council, of which Hugo Swire is Chairman, does not give details of its meetings:

https://cmec.org.uk/

Has anyone noticed …

… that Hugo Swire only seems to visit his constituency on Fridays, crams as many photo ops in as many Tory places and tweets as possible then … that seems to be it till the next Friday.

Claire Wright is here every day, including weekends, battling for the NHS, schools, highways, the environment, planning, flooding …

No wonder Mr Swire bans her from meetings on her ward issues – on a Friday! It must worry him a lot.

At least we know where he was on 17 October:

Oh, oh – Government says we have to have an elected Mayor!

Must be a credible figure … now, THAT is going to take some finding! From Devon or Somerset? Career councillor or business person? Nuclear interests or not? LEP member or not? Brexiter or not? Developer or not? Ruralist or Urbanist? And where is DCC, Greater Exeter and EDDC in all this? …

AND Sajid Javid manages to disparage tourism and older people in one paragraph.

“Ambitious devolution plans for Devon and Somerset need an elected mayor, the region’s economic leaders have been warned. Sajid Javid, secretary of state for communities and local government said there has to be a credible figurehead for economic growth for the Government to be prepared to hand over powers for investment, transport and infrastructure.

He made the stark statement at the South West Growth Summit, a major meeting of business leaders, politicians and academics from across all sectors in the South West.

The assertion comes as all 17 Devon and Somerset councils reach a critical stage in their bid for devolved powers – and the sticking point is the need for an elected mayor.

Mr Javid said that only an elected mayor could bring the kind of ambitions devolution that the region is calling for. To a packed Reed Hall at the University of Exeter, the minister, who is an alumni, said: “If you want an ambitious devolution deal then you have got to have a mayor.”

And he argued that Cornwall’s Devolution Deal without an elected mayor was not ambitious and did not involve any hand over of money. “What’s the point of going down that route?” he said.

Mr Javid called for the region to have one voice on its plans for economic prosperity. In a region that is challenged by disparate communities and historical rivalries, he said: “If you are going to make a success of the south-west that whole attitude has to change.”A region of collaboration and co-operation can make a difference. It has to happen,” he said.

The beauty of the region means as strong reliance on tourism, but it is a double-edged sword, he warned. “It perpetuates the idea that this is a low skill and part-time economy. It is not just a sunny playground for the rest of the country nor a retirement community for Britain’s pensioners.”

He said the 3 million population of Devon, Cornwall, Somerset and Dorset were leading the way in aerospace and creative industries and it is a question of taking that message to the rest of the country and the world.

The South West Growth Summit was hosted by the Pennon Group in conjunction with the Western Morning News and the region’s Local Enterprise Partnerships. The debate held at the event will go on to help form a Growth Charter for the South West, a document that will be presented to the Government ahead of next month’s Autumn Statement.

The region’s MPs joined business leaders to discuss a number of key issues facing the region, including keeping the brightest talent and attracting investment.
Connectivity in terms of mobile and broadband coverage and investment in the road, rail and air routes continue to be high on the agenda.

Chris Loughlin, Chairman of the Pennon Group called for the region to embrace the digital revolution, the kind of business that makes a virtue of working in remote communities.

He said that the region must decide what the South West is and formulate a concept to rival the Northern Powerhouse or Midlands Engine to capture the collective consciousness. “It is essential that we have a clear unified voice to stand up strong for the South West.”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/an-elected-mayor-is-the-answer-to-devolution-ambitions-warns-javid/story-29829580-detail/story.html

5 French nuclear reactors closed and 7 others examined for safety reasons

“The company building Britain’s first nuclear power station for 21 years has been ordered to shut down five more reactors in France for emergency tests.

The order from the French Nuclear Safety Agency is a further blow to the finances and reputation of EDF, the state-owned company behind plans to build an £18 billion nuclear power plant at Hinkley Point in Somerset.

It brings to 12 the total number of French reactors being examined by experts to determine whether they contain hidden weaknesses in their reactor pressure vessels, a key component that houses the reactor.

Theresa May approved plans for Hinkley Point, which will generate 7 per cent of Britain’s electricity, last month, despite intense criticism of the high price tag and concerns about EDF’s reactor technology.

The safety agency’s order for EDF to shut reactors at Civaux, Fessenheim, Gravelines and Tricastin for tests has also sparked concerns that the group, the world’s biggest nuclear generator, may struggle to meet French demand for electricity this winter. Nuclear power provides nearly 80 per cent of the country’s electricity.

French power prices hit a four-year high yesterday amid fears of a supply crunch. Experts also warned of a possible impact on the UK, which imports French electricity during periods of high demand in January and February.

Dominic Whittome, an independent energy consultant, said that the shutdowns would mean “less spare electricity to export to Britain” at a time of tight supply margins, after the closure of a string of ageing British coal stations.

Greg Clark, the business and energy secretary, signed a final contract for EDF to construct two European pressurised reactors at Hinkley Point on September 29. The French group has a two-thirds stake, while China General Nuclear has a one-third stake in the project.

However, EDF is grappling with controversy after the disclosure last year that the reactor pressure vessel at a similar plant that it is building at Flamanville in Normandy contains unusually high levels of carbon. Experts say that this could make the structure unsafe.

Amid fears that the Flamanville vessel could crack once the plant enters service after 2018, France’s nuclear watchdog ordered stress tests on other reactors. These have highlighted a series of problems.

There are also financial concerns for EDF, which has debts of €37 billion. A total of 21 of its 58 French reactors are now shut down, either for scheduled maintenance or because of the nuclear watchdog’s demands. Le Monde said that EDF was losing €1 million a day for each of the reactors currently off-stream.

A spokesman for EDF said that the 12 reactors undergoing tests would be returned by the end of the year.”

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/business/edf-ordered-to-switch-off-five-reactors-3zsnzbl6b

Big brother watching granny?

“The £2,500 digital ‘granny tracker’ that promises to save thousands in care costs

A controversial monitoring system aiming to cut care bills by allowing family members to keep elderly relatives under surveillance at all times is to be sold in Britain for the first time.

It costs users £2,860 a year and, in connection with a range of “smart” household devices, can track a person’s exact whereabouts as well as check whether they have stocked their fridge, taken their medicine, or whether they are watching TV or using other appliances.

It can also tell “remote carers” whether the person is standing up or lying down, and transmit details of their pulse.

While traditional monitoring systems, such as Age UK’s personal alarm service, already offer a responsive service if something goes wrong, this new technology – called “Grandcare” – goes much further.

It comes as families and councils are under pressure to cut the mounting costs of care.

Care home fees are rising in some cases by more than 10pc a year. The cost of drop-in carers helping vulnerable people in their own homes is also mounting.

The previous government’s promise of a cap on care costs, which would limit spending to £72,000, has been delayed.

In the meantime, anyone with more than £23,250 in assets, including a home, is liable to pay their own fees.

Some families are spending hundreds of thousands of pounds on care, with homes continuing to be sold to meet the bills.

“Grandcare”, marketed by Atel, presents itself as a possible solution to this problem. It is in use in America and is being trialled in Britain. It is expected to be available to families here by February.

A central interface, like a computer screen, receives and processes data from sensors in the elderly person’s home and on their person. Relatives can then check up on the person’s health, whereabouts and wellbeing via their own mobile phone or tablet.

A “tag” – an electronic device which adheres to the person’s arm or ankle – allows the remote carer to check the person’s pulse and whether they are upright.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/pensions-retirement/financial-planning/the-2500-digital-granny-tracker-that-promises-to-save-thousands/

“‘Within hours of arriving, I was on a yacht with some investors, being asked to join the Freemasons’ “

“This week, the UK’s largest property event, the MIPIM conference, has opened in London. “#MIPIMUK is waiting for you,” tweeted @MIPIMWorld, the Twitter handle of the international organisation. Underneath was an image of exploding paintballs, overlaid with the words: “THE POST BREXIT BOOM – Are you ready?” …

… The conference this week will be a fairly sedate affair: property magnates with lanyards in expensive suits, stalls dedicated to the Midlands Engine and the Northern Powerhouse, tired corporate phrases like “driving innovation and diversification in the market” (tweeted out from that same MIPIM handle this morning), and so on.

The real fun is had at their annual event in Cannes, scheduled for mid-March, where estate agency professionals and wealthy investors cavort around five-star hotels and champagne receptions in the sunshine, while ruminating about the housing crisis many of them benefit from directly.

“Within hours of arriving, I was on a yacht with some investors, being asked to join the Freemasons,” one MIPIM attendee told me about his experience last year. Another described it as a “nonstop party” where she woke up one morning and couldn’t remember the name of the hotel she was staying in “until I looked at the monogram on my bespoke dressing gown”.

You meet some people who are involved in things that feel dodgy,” another property professional admitted.

“I work in property and I didn’t know about the layers of middlemen and secret deals that go on, particularly where London is concerned. Investors buy up flats before they’re built, then sell them on to other investors, but they don’t want the public to know they’re selling them again because that would drive down the price of the other units they own. So they pay off middlemen to do private deals with people they know, just to keep knowledge of the deals out of the public domain.” …

… Estate agents were happy to tell me that they’re seeing more foreign investors than ever offer to buy London flats traditionally expected to be taken by UK-based first time buyers “because their money goes twice as far now”, which is “great for business”. This is the “Brexit bubble” people feared would make the housing crisis worse after leaving the EU, and it’s fast becoming a reality. One presumes it’s why one of MIPIM’s main events this week is titled: “Extraordinary times, extraordinary returns?”.

Cast your eye over the speakers at MIPIM this week and there’s little to feel optimistic about. There’s Navid Chamdia, the UCL-educated head of real estate at the Qatar Investment Authority. He focuses “on direct acquisitions, joint ventures and co-investments in Europe” after spending 12 years at Ernst & Young “advising on the financing and delivery of over $10bn of global real estate and infrastructure projects”.

There’s Simon Mower, associate director at KPMG Debt Advisory who “has particularly strong experience in the real estate market… navigating the sector’s lender universe… structuring investment and development financing transactions for his clients.” There’s even one entertainingly named Mark Bourgeois.

Then, of course, there’s our astonishingly out-of-touch housing minister Gavin Barwell, who famously suggested that the solution to generational inequality was everybody’s rich grandparents skipping a generation with inheritance and giving the millions they’ve squirrelled away to their grandkids.

Barwell also made a speech two weeks ago in which he suggested the housing crisis could be tackled by making young people live in smaller rooms. “We want people to innovate – there are things the private sector is doing,” he told a fringe event at the Conservative conference. “I don’t know if anyone’s seen any of the schemes that Pocket [Living] have done where they’ve basically done a deal with the GLA [Greater London Authority] to get some flexibility on space standards. As a result they can offer a product well below market price.” A tarted-up way, of course, of saying Pocket Living has managed to twist the standards on what usually would be considered habitable.

For a government minister to openly celebrate this isn’t just irresponsible; it’s downright bizarre.

Britain has the smallest homes in Europe at an average of 500sqft for a one-bedroom flat and Pocket Living sells 400sqft flats – about the size of the average American sitting room, or the average UK hotel room – starting at £250,000.

This week, Gavin Barwell will speak at MIPIM alongside Marc Vlessing, chief executive of Pocket Living, whose background is “in City corporate finance”. If that doesn’t speak volumes about the housing crisis, the Government and the property professionals who pull the strings across the UK, I don’t know what does.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/mipim-housing-crisis-markets-insiders-what-they-say-london-conference-property-magnates-a7369621.html

“Commons watchdog chair Sir Kevin Barron ‘breached’ MPs’ code of conduct “

“The Labour MP in charge of overseeing ethical standards for MPs has been found to have breached a committee’s code of conduct.

Sir Kevin Barron, the chairman of the standards committee, accepted payment for hosting events for a drug company in Parliament.

However, the committee has recommended that no further action is required against Sir Kevin after they concluded that the breach had been “minor” and “inadvertent”.

In March he announced that he had referred himself to Kathryn Hudson, the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, over the disclosures which were first revealed in the Telegraph.

The fees received by Sir Kevin after sponsoring three events in Parliament were donated to charity, and Ms Hudson concluded the breach of the rules was “at the least serious end of the spectrum” because the MP did not personally benefit.

The report recommended that no further action was required against the Labour MP, who stood aside while the committee examined his case, and the inquiry had raised “no doubts over Kevin Barron’s integrity and honesty”.

Parliamentary rules prohibit MPs from using Commons resources to “confer any undue personal or financial benefit on themselves or anyone else”.

Sir Kevin said that his fees from the organisation had all been paid to charity, and therefore he had not breached the Code of Conduct.

But Sir Alistair Graham, the former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said that members of the committee needed to be “whiter than white” and even if Sir Kevin had not personally received the money, the arrangement was still a breach of the rules.

Lord Bew, the chairman of the committee on standards in public life, has called for an overhaul of the Commons standards committe, warning that it looks like an “insider’s game” in which MPs are “marking their own homework”.

Sir Kevin said: “The report published today has found no serious breaches as I always maintained. The inquiry has found a ‘minor’ and ‘inadvertent’ breach of a banqueting rule. I felt that I had taken all the steps I could to check the rules, but acknowledge my mistake.

“Just to make it absolutely clear, this arrangement led to no personal financial gain as payment was made, as a donation, to a local children’s hospice in my constituency.

“I would like to thank Kathryn Hudson, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, for her very thorough investigation into this matter and the Committee on Standards for their judgment.

“I will be resuming my duties as chair of the Committee on Standards and the Committee of Privileges. It has always been a huge honour to chair these committees and I am delighted to return to this role.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/20/commons-watchdog-chair-sir-kevin-barron-breached-mps-code-of-con/

FoI to EDDC – what response given to DCC on preferred new road route

“If EDDC has responded in any way to DCC expressing a view about the choice of routes for the A30 that they are currently consulting on, can you please let me know what that view was and what planning policy guidance you had regard to when deciding what route to support and what the advice was from your planning officers (if any) that you obtained?”

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/access-to-information/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-published-requests/

Farmer Swire! Calls out Countryfile and says Chris Packham “absurd”

Do you think he had his Barbour wellies on whilst saying this? And nice to see he got a publicity shot in for his developer friends at Crealy!

South-west Agriculture and Fishing
– in Westminster Hall at 4:38 pm on 19th October 2016.

“I pay tribute to my hon. Friend Scott Mann for securing the debate, which is particularly timely for me because I have my catch-up with the National Farmers Union at Crealy park in East Devon on Friday. We will hear a lot over the coming months and years about the threats and opportunities of Brexiting and it is up to us as parliamentarians to ensure that the opportunities trump the threats.

The threats are pretty obvious to the farming and fishing sectors. There are threats of access to markets—we do not know what shape they will take—and we have heard about freedom of movement issues, and of labour in particular, in the south-west, be that for people working in the poultry business or picking vegetables or daffodils further west. However, it seems to me that none of us will lament the passing of the common agricultural policy or the EU common fisheries policy.

We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to answer the question: does farming have a future? That is a question that, if we get it right, we will no longer have to ask ourselves. This is a time to shape our farming, shape our fishing and shape our countryside, to show people that there is indeed a future. It is self-evident, of course, that we continue with arrangements as they are for now. It does need the Secretary of State to confirm this; we can continue with the status quo until we sign the decree absolute in the divorce from the EU. It is what happens after that is important, as we change the existing legislation to reflect what we want for UK policy.

I think this is genuinely a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for our farming industries and I very much hope that Ministers in the Department will not spend the next few months or years talking to lobbyists or large organisations, but talking to the practitioners on the ground. I hope they will talk to the supermarkets and finally get some sense out of them in promoting British products at fair prices. I hope they will talk to the Environment Agency and Natural England and other organisations to ensure they are refocused to support a farmed countryside, not the sanitised version of the countryside as evidenced weekly by programmes that the BBC so loves, such as “Countryfile”— or, even worse, by the absurd Chris Packham.”

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2016-10-19a.375.0&s=speaker%3A1

Why is East Devon’s MP cherry-picking only his own community hospitals to save?

Hugo Swire says he is “fighting for” Exmouth and Sidmouth community hospitals. Though his idea of fighting for them whilst suggesting the NHS must economise, is somewhat disingenuous.

Neil Parish, whilst fighting for his own, says MPs should also be fighting for all of them.

Parish is right.

What happens if you live in Sidmouth and Exmouth and Sidmouth hospitals are full?

What happens if you live in Swire’s constituency and yet your nearest community hospital is in Parish’s constituency?

What happens if your hospital is closed because of infection? What happens if your hospital is closed for repairs?

What happens if the RD and E has a major incident on the M5 or Exeter Airport and has to ship out the least ill patients to other areas to cope?

People do not live in isolation and do not get sick in “efficient” places.

We need ALL our community hospitals for ALL of us everywhere.

Though East Devon’s MP, living as he does in mid-Devon and usually in the constituency on the odd Friday (when he fills his diary with photo opportunities and meetings from which he excludes the district’s county councillor) will quite likely never experience these choices.

Claire Wright on local NHS

Claire Wright has been battling to save our local NHS for YEARS while our two local MPs only noticed the problem a few weeks ago. The voice of common sense:

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/tories-playing-political-football-with-the-nhs-claire-wright/story-29821791-detail/story.html

Consultation: gypsy and traveller policy

Consultation ends 15 November 2016 – apart from 30 pitches in Cranbrook, it appears that other sites will be shoe-horned into planning applications where EDDC can see the possibility of suitable sites.

So that could be anywhere else in the district – some plan!

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/news/2016/10/council-consults-on-gypsy-and-traveller-supplementary-planning-document-spd/

Government savings of £90 million cost £94 million to make!

“Ongoing failures of leadership and governance must be urgently addressed if shared service centres are to deliver expected savings, the Public Accounts Committee said today.

The PAC assessed the progress of a government scheme to cut costs through sharing departmental back office functions that has been running for four years, publishing its findings in a report out today.

It found the two schemes evaluated have delivered savings of £90m but at cost of £94m, incurring a net cost to the taxpayer of £4m.

Moreover, the committee concluded that government was “failing for much the same reasons” as identified by a 2012 PAC probe, principally weak governance and leadership, and poor departmental collaboration.

Today’s report found that, at the outset, the Cabinet Office did not have leaders in place with appropriate shared services experience. Also, while the Cabinet Office managed the framework agreements between government and suppliers, departments had individual contracts with suppliers. Consequently, when problems arose the Cabinet Office did not always have a clear mandate to intervene. This exacerbated the issue of departments acting independently rather than collaboratively.

Critically, the committee found there was no overall business case for the two shared service centres. While business cases were prepared, these were found to be partial, incomplete and out of date.

It was also too easy for departments to pull out of the programme, which some have done to “protect their own interests.” …”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2016/10/leadership-and-governance-failures-jeopardise-shared-services-scheme-pac-finds

EDDC Standards Committee very happy with itself and has (so far) no Forward Plan

Summary:

Happy with the code of conduct – tick
Happy with keeping complaints anonymous unless officially taken forward – tick

One more agenda item: Forward Plan. And the Forward Plan is?

Committee members to advise of any items for the Forward Plan.”

Click to access 271016standardscttecombinedagenda.pdf

The vast majority of complaints never make it past the Monitoring Officer to them.

What a happy committee!

Barratt Homes London boss arrested

“The London boss of housebuilding giant Barratt Developments has been arrested after an investigation into alleged misconduct in the process for awarding contracts.

Alastair Baird, regional managing director for the London region, and one other former Barratt London employee were arrested this morning, the firm said.

It has suspended Mr Baird following the arrest.

Mr Baird joined Barratt as a site manager in 1987 and was promoted to London managing director in 2011 – a division employing more than 650 staff.

He is given a glowing review on the company’s website which praises him for being a ‘dynamic leader with an enviable reputation’ and ‘superb relationships with key public and private sector stakeholders’.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3851340/London-boss-housebuilders-Barratt-Developments-arrested-probe-awarding-contracts.html