“NHS underfunding blamed for maternity ward closures”

“Underfunding in the NHS has been blamed for a sharp increase in maternity wards temporarily closing to new admissions since 2014.

Data obtained by Labour under the Freedom of Information Act showed that in 2016 there were 382 occasions when units have closed doors, a 70% increase in incidents between 2014 and 2016. Some units have closed more than once.

The figures released today showed across England there were 225 closures in 2014, 375 in 2015, rising to almost 400 last year.

Information from the 96 hospital trusts – out of 136 – that responded to the FOI request indicated nearly half of England’s maternity wards, 42 (44%), were affected by the closures, some of which lasted more than 24 hours.

Ten trusts had to shut temporarily on more than ten separate occasions each.

Jonathan Ashworth, Labour’s shadow secretary of state for health, said: “These findings show the devastating impact which Tory underfunding is having for mothers and children across the country.

“It is staggering that almost half of maternity units in England had to close to new mothers at some point in 2016.”

Sean O’Sullivan, head of health and social policy at The Royal College of Midwives (RCM), said trusts were right to close wards when not doing so risked compromising safety of the service but stressed that persistent and regular closures were a sign of an underlying problem around capacity and staffing levels that needed “immediate attention”.

He added: “The RCM has warned time and time again that persistent understaffing does compromise safety and it’s about time the government listened to those best place to advise.”

According to a report from February, the RCM states the health service has a shortage of 3,500 midwives with over a third soon approaching retirement age.

A spokesman for the Department for Health, said: “Temporary closures in NHS maternity units are well rehearsed safety measures which we expect trusts to use to safely manage peaks in admissions.

“To use these figures as an indication of safe staffing issues, particularly when a number of them could have been for a matter of hours, is misleading because maternity services are unable to plan the exact time and place of birth for all women in their care.”

The government says the NHS now employees an extra 2,000 midwives since May 2010 and another 6,500 are currently in training.”

http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2017/08/nhs-underfunding-blamed-maternity-ward-closures

Speak truth to power – or watch chickens coming home to roost

Guardian letters

• Rather predictably, following James Munby’s “blood on our hands” outburst, the NHS “identified a bed” for the suicidal 17-year-old, leaving him to claim, probably correctly, that NHS England would not have acted “as effectively or speedily” without his “outspoken warnings” (Judge’s plea as suicidal teenager is found refuge, 8 August). With new crises being highlighted almost daily, the latest being the closure of maternity wards, and pregnant women being “pushed from pillar to post”, Munby’s example should be followed (Maternity wards closed 400 times as shortage of beds and staff grows, 8 August).

At a time when the “austerity chickens” are coming home to roost, and Labour protests are not always getting the media attention they deserve, he cannot be the only dignitary to be appalled by the current situation. Is it not incumbent upon all judges, archbishops, lords, and even some “celebrities”, to make their voices heard? If the “brand” is indeed to be “reinvented”, royals also could be doing more than “championing mental-health charities” (The royals, a brand reinvented by the millennial generation, 5 August).”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/aug/08/britains-young-suffer-as-austerity-continues-to-take-its-toll

Exmouth Regeneration: computer says “no”!

Dear Dr MacAllister

Thank you for your request for information. Please find the response to your query below.

Please clarify who was awarded the contract to market the site for the second time and when the agent began the process of remarketing the site
The requested information is not held – we have not progressed the re-marketing of this site.

How many developers were contacted with brochures or other marketing materials in respect of the second marketing of the Queens Drive site?
The requested information is not held – we have not progressed the re-marketing of this site

What has been, or will be, the process for the selection of the preferred bidder?
The requested information is not held – this process has not commenced

How many organisations have, to date, submitted a bid to develop the site and what are there names?
No information held – we have not progressed the re-marketing of this site

What is the timeline with regards to choosing a preferred developer
Timescales are as published online http://eastdevon.gov.uk/regeneration-pro… although there has been some slippage.

Please provide minutes of meetings and correspondence between the council, the marketing agent and prospective and submitted bidders
The requested information is not held – we have not progressed the re-marketing of this site

Please provide evidence and explanation of the logic of pursuing vacant possession as a means ro entice a developer and please explain the process of decision making
The requested information is not held – we have not progressed the re-marketing of this site and so minutes, emails and other communications are not held. Please also note that we are not required to provide commentary or explanation in order to comply with our obligations under Freedom of Information legislation – our responsibility is to provide copies of information held only.

I hope this information is helpful but, if you feel dissatisfied with the way we have responded to your request, please contact our Monitoring Officer, Mr Henry Gordon Lennox, to request an internal review [email address]

You may also approach the Information Commissioner for advice at http://www.ico.org.uk

Regards

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/selection_of_developer_for_the_q?nocache=incoming-1019239#incoming-1019239

East Devon: not the best place to have babies?

Honiton, Tiverton and Okehampton maternity units are to close, with services centralised on Exeter.

Let’s, say, take Hawkchurch:

Hawkchurch to Honiton – 15 miles, 25 minutes to Honiton
Hawkchurch to Exeter – 33 miles, 53 minutes to Exeter

Source: AA route planner, miles rounded

28 extra minutes – ON A GOOD DAY – to hospital with a maternity emergency.

That’s if you have a car with an available driver – or an ambulance – sitting outside your home when an emergency begins. A very unlikely scenario. And it assumes a clear road and good conditions – not night-time rain or snow, or a blocked country road.

Under this government, maternity units are understaffed and under pressure. It’s shameful that pregnant women are being turned away due to staff shortages, and shortages of beds and cots in maternity units.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/08/nhs-maternity-wards-england-forced-closures-labour

Hello, Mr Parish, hello.

Hospital closures: “Repulsive party political puppet show” and “Bow your heads in shame”

Two letters in View from … titles – pulling no punches