Category Archives: Environment (local)
Hugo needed yet again to sort out Sidmouth’s drains!
Forget Ottery, Hugo – Sidmouth (and Woodbury) need you back to sort out their drains!
Here is where he promised to sort the sewers out:
http://www.hugoswire.org.uk/news/towns-arteries-clogged-fat
and indeed the clogged fat was said to have been cleared in July:
http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/news/sidmouth_s_sewers_cleared_of_fatbergs_1_3698046.
Back to the drawing board on water drains and a need to put on the high-vis jacket again, Hugo, with or without the shovel and with or without the clogged arteries!
Just a thought, but it might be Victorian drains trying to cope where massive development and more houses hasn’t led to massive upgrading of infrastructure.
“The arrogant and philistine are ruining our countryside”
“Borchester Land” (The Archers) also known as …. ?
Some eerily resonant stories in The Archers about “Borchester Land” surely not based on any real consortium ….. or councillors … or … other things. Art imitating life or life imitating art?
“In July 1997, a consortium of business people formed Borchester Land (BL). The company was a vehicle to buy the Berrow Estate, which was being sold by Simon Pemberton.
The estate comprised 1020 acres of Ambridge farmland, two tenanted holdings: Bridge Farm and Grange Farm, and a set of business units converted from buildings at the former Sawyer’s Farm.
Brian Aldridge was soon revealed to be a member of the consortium. But the remainder were urban types who knew little about farming. The company was chaired by lairy Matt Crawford, originally from Peckham, who initially didn’t much like the countryside because it was too quiet.
One of Matt’s first proposals was to build a leisure complex on Estate land. Appalled Brian’s objections were vindicated when an accountant’s report pointed out the capital gains losses they would have to sustain.
Grange Farm
Matt had little patience with the Grundy family, who chaotically ran the ramshackle Grange Farm. In 2000, they were evicted for non-payment of rent. The farmhouse and 50 acres were sold to the much more acceptable Oliver Sterling.
Grange Spinney
Matt’s big guns were back in 2001. After a change to the council’s Local Plan, BL applied for planning permission to build a large housing development on some of their land near the historic church of St Stephen’s: 30 four- and five-bedroom houses and eight low-cost homes. A few local businesses and young people were in favour. But most of the village was outraged. Brian, as the local face of BL, was in great discomfort.
Brenda Tucker, then working for Radio Borsetshire, unearthed indications of corrupt links between BL director Andrew Eagleton and district councillor Stephen Chalkman. But she handled it badly, accusing Chalkman live on air and nearly losing her job. Despite the disgrace, she eventually brought undeclared evidence to Brian that Chalkman’s wife would benefit from the development.
When confronted, Matt blustered, then tried to bribe Brian, and finally caved. They would reduce their proposals. After further negotiation, in 2003 six low-cost dwellings and 12 luxury homes were built: Grange Spinney.
Arable contract
Brian had negotiated a five-year contract to farm the ‘in-hand land’. But by 2001, he was sweating, as the Estate had not delivered the farming income he had projected. Unsympathetic to Brian’s excuses of a market slump, rising fuel costs and poor weather, the board appointed new contractors.
It was 2006 before Home Farm won the contract back. Brian’s step-daughter Debbie Aldridge would manage the contract from Hungary while his step-son Adam Macy would carry out the work.
The shoot
Although not a natural countryman, Matt did like shooting, especially as a means of entertaining business contacts. He was soon interfering in the shoot, driving up numbers to the detriment of the wild native birds.
The Home Farm and Estate shoots were run in conjunction with the shooting in Grey Gables Country Park. When fading Jack Woolley sold the hotel in 2006, Borchester Land bought the park to consolidate the shoot. It also bought the adjoining land land used by Ambridge Golf Club.
Skylarks
Matt doesn’t have much of a green agenda. In 2008, he forced Adam to plough up set-aside land at Quarry Bank. Pip Archer was appalled at the destruction of a rare skylark habitat. It was a newcomer to the board, their former solicitor Annabelle Schrivener, who encouraged Matt to take a cannier line and be a little more accommodating with local environmentalists.
Matt eventually received praise in the local press when he agreed that Adam could install skylark plots in the adjacent Forty Acre.
Bridge Farm
In May 2008, Pat and Tony Archer were dumbstruck. Their landlord (BL) had applied for planning permission to convert the barn they used as their vegetable packhouse into a four-bedroom house. This caused huge family friction, as Matt had by now shacked up with Tony’s sister Lilian Bellamy. Tony’s brother-in-law Brian protested that the decision had slipped through without him noticing.
Pat and Tony mobilised a protest campaign. Brian’s daughter Alice touted their petition around the family. At a planning committee meeting in July, Pat spoke convincingly of the importance of the building to Bridge Farm’s business, and the proposal was rejected.
But it hardened Pat and Tony’s determination to throw off the yoke of their landlord. Matt drove such a hard bargain that they nearly gave up. But pushed by their offspring Helen and Tom, they just scraped together enough finance for the agreed price of £825K.
Matt is ousted
Matt’s control of BL ended in 2009, when he was prosecuted for fraud conducted by an investment company he jointly owned with Stephen Chalkman (yes, him again). Annabelle choreographed his demise, and his replacement. Not only did Brian take over the chair, but Home Farm managed to retain their farming contract. Brian was riding high.
Borchester Livestock Market
Because of traffic problems, South Borsetshire District Council had long been keen to move the livestock market from its potentially lucrative site in Borchester. In 2010, Brian conceived an ambitious plan. He negotiated the tricky purchase of 25 acres of farmland on the by-pass. BL put forward plans for a new market fit for the 21st century.
Things were looking good until September, when Matt revealed that he had bought a small ‘ransom strip’ – land that was essential for access to the site. As well as an exorbitant sum, Matt demanded BL shares and a seat on the board for Lilian. After difficult arguments with the board, Brian eventually offered Lilian a directorship of the operating company – Borchester Market Developments (BMD). And Matt still made a pile of cash out of the deal.
In 2011 as work progressed, the council received a bid for the old market site from a supermarket. BMD agreed to speed up the construction, against Brian’s better judgement because of severe penalty clauses if they missed the deadline. When the diggers turned up a vast cache of bones from a former Foot and Mouth Disease burial site, it nearly jeopardised the whole project.
Despite this setback, the market opened on time, with only a few teething troubles, at the beginning of December.
The ‘mega dairy’
The market was a walk in the park compared with Brian’s next scheme. In September 2011, Debbie proposed setting up a large-scale dairy operation. 1500 cattle would be kept permanently indoors, and their slurry would feed an anaerobic digester supplying power to the grid.
Brian put the plans to the board. But when Adam learned of them, he refused to cooperate, as it was anathema to his philosophy of farming. Brian was forced to tread a difficult path, contracting other farmers to supply feed and silage for the cattle.
Meanwhile, public anger quickly grew. Many people were disgusted at the prospect of cows who would never see daylight or fresh grass. Brian was at odds with members of his extended family. BL countered a difficult public meeting, rowdy demonstrations at their market and critical press coverage with a PR campaign and a glossy DVD.
In April 2012 the council approved the application. But it still wasn’t plain sailing. When one of the contracted farmers pulled out, Brian unilaterally decided that Home Farm would have to step in. Adam came close to throwing it all up and moving away but he and Brian eventually reached a shaky détente.
Building work began in September. In January 2013, highly qualified Rob Titchener started as herd manager, and the first heifers arrived in August. In a bid to belie the vast industrial nature of the buildings, Brian and Rob named the enterprise Berrow Farm, to the scorn of its critics.
Damara Capital
But Brian’s success with the market and dairy were short-lived. He was aghast when in 2014 aggressive Damara Capital became majority shareholders of BL. Brian tried to cling to control. But he was replaced as Chair, ironically by his former kingmaker Annabelle Schrivener.”
Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thearchers/posts/Borchester-Land
Countryside under siege
Thought-provoking article on Western Morning News website:
“…If you love something and know it should be protected from harm, you will fight for it – preferably with others, but alone if needs be. But standing up for the countryside can be a lonely furrow to plough in a modern world where our leaders seem to have turned their backs on the nation’s once beloved green acres. …
..But if we have warned, cajoled and focused on the idea that the countryside is under attack from a government which puts short-term profit and gain above the concept of long-term sustainability, then what has puzzled me is why national newspapers and celebrity media commentators aren’t leaping on the same bandwagon. …
….Mr Jenkins [ outgoing Chairman if the National Trust] believes developers have been successful in their bid to build on the countryside, thanks to the fact that they have a “friend” in the Chancellor. If you think the former NT chairman might be deluded, then look at how many towns around the Westcountry are being encircled by new housing developments, despite the fact that communities are protesting they don’t have the infrastructure – or jobs – to support such large numbers of incomers. …
… The countryside isn’t just a pretty place – although there’s evidence to prove that being a pretty place has financial worth both in terms of tourism and wellbeing. It is a provider rather than a taker. It gives far more in the way of economic benefit than it costs. It grows the food we eat, provides the water we drink, helps clean the air we breathe and sequester the muck we shove into the atmosphere. Its worth is far more than anything politicians could hope to accrue by allowing get-rich -quick developers to convert green acres into temporary money spinning fields.”
Could you, too, be a SWIMBY?
Check this link and consider.. http://www.transitionnetwork.org/blogs/rob-hopkins/2014-10/our-month-rethinking-real-estate-why-i-m-proud-be-swimby
Retiring director of National Trust slams Prime Minister
In an article in today’s Sunday Times, Sir Simon Jenkins says:
“PM ‘ has wrecked beautiful Britain’
Summary
He argues that Britain has a better record of protecting urban environments than rural ones;
“We have looked after our cities very well for decades”
“We are very good at preserving architecture. But we are now really bad at protecting the countryside and landscapes.”
Over the past year, the trust has received about 400 calls from people in towns and villages objecting to what they consider unsightly and unnecessary applications for developments on their outskirts, “Yet five years ago we used to get a handful annually,” said Jenkins.
He ends by saying: “This guerrilla warfare between developers and the countryside must be stopped.”
“Illiterate planning”
“The idea you can allow these volume estates – almost all identical – to go ahead as they wish on the grounds that they are pro-growth is illiterate planning.”
Sir Simon Jenkins, Outgoing Chair of The National Trust (quoted from his article in today’s Daily Telegraph, p.4)
Act for Nature
Wildlife Trusts, Natural England, RSPB join together to press for wildlife conservation:
Disappointment with Coalition sees rural vote up for grabs
Express and Echo front page report on developers’ building spree in East Devon
Developers, councils and Section 106: the shocking truth
We tried to find the most significant facts in this long and shocking article, but really it must be read from beginning to end.
It exposes the disgraceful tactics that developers use to maximise their profits and minimise their obligations.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid:
Feniton and Wain Homes on “The One Show” yesterday
Still available on iPlayer.
Basically, Wain Homes say they have not installed the attenuation tanks that should have bedn installed BEFORE any home was occupied because they want to install different ones. Six houses are now occupied, likely to increase to 15 by Christmas.
Why have the tanks not been installed?
Because Wain Homes intend to extend the site with more houses and to do so will need bigger or more tanks.
Just one problem: they have not submitted further plans for more houses and the Planning Inspector recently ruled that only the current number was sustainable (in part because of the tanks) in the village.
Wain Homes refused to allow the BBC reporter on their site and refused a comment.
A Google search on Wain Homes will show that this is by no means the first time that they have courted controversy … particularly in Cornwall.
Thank heavens the district councillor for Feniton is hard-working Susie Bond and not its former incumbent disgraced ex-councillor Graham Brown, under whose watch huge numbers of houses were planned for the village with no apparent discouragement from him – indeed he was often absent from crucial meetings and did not speak up for residents at council meetings where they were discussed.
At the time he was Chairman of the East Devon Business Forum and had been Chairman of the first Local Plan Panel (2007-2011) whose work was thrown out by the incoming council in 2011 only to see their plan similarly thrown out earlier this year by the Planning Inspectorate.
Had we had a Local Plan in place it is unlikely that the current situation would have happened at all.
And in other news …
Whilst we await our Chief Executive’s appearance at tonight’s council meeting, here is some other news that has been happening over the last few days:
.
Supermarkets – the new charity shops?
EDDC’s flagship regeneration policy of putting a supermarket in all seaside towns as close to the seaside as possible already looks to be a busted flush.
Tesco has just announced it will abandon its plan to build a superstore on the seafront in Margate to which Pickles had given a green light!
In an article in the business section of the Guardian we read:
“Pickles was criticised for backing the Tesco Margate scheme by the self-styled Queen of Shops Mary Portas, who said it showed the government was only paying “lip service” to the idea of reviving Britain’s high streets as the store would have a “catastrophic” impact on the town.
Margate was among the “Portas Pilot” towns which won £100,000 in funding to back new ideas to boost trade and refill empty shops on some of the UK’s most battered high streets.
Louise Oldfield, a local hotel owner who pushed for the judicial review, said she was shocked that Tesco had pulled out but it was good news for Margate. “We hope we can now move forward towards a more sustainable proposal for Margate. This proposal would have had a massive impact on the seafront,” she said.”
But what irrevocable damage has now been done to our seaside towns in East Devon? Certainly too late for Seaton.
Cranbrook to double in size
In addition to the 6,000 homes already planned, developers are to submit plans for a further 1,500 homes. They also say they will build infrastructure but with still no Community Infrastructure Levy in place there is almost nothing in place to ensure that it happens.
DIY repairs to Devon roads
Brush up those tarmacking skills – you are going to need them. Can’t wait to see DCC Councillor for Highways, Stuart Hughes, in a blue boiler suit:
At a time when the news tells us that Devon has some of the most dangerous country roads which have ten times more fatalities than motorways comes a call for local people to voluntarily maintain their own bits of road and fill in their own potholes.
Feniton developers issued with breach of conditions notice by EDDC
Finally developers Wain Homes are put under pressure to do what they were supposed to do: build attenuation tanks for surface water run off which should have been done BEFORE homes were occupied. At least six are now in occupation with no sign of the tanks
New buyers drop for south-west homes
And still we build more and more. If people can’t afford them what happens next? If interest rates go up and put those in homes in negative equity where they can’t afford higher payments – what next?
New planning rules evict successful businesses from offices turned into homes
Has the government abandoned the idea of a 5/6 year land supply?
An interesting perspective from an experienced planning lawyer:
“You can tell there’s an election coming. Even though ministers and their advisers are well aware that there is an urgent need to release land, including Green Belt land, to meet the requirements for housing land, De-CLoG has issued a statement in which they once again trot out the old mantra that, once established, Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional cases.
Eric Pickles is quoted as saying: “Protecting our precious green belt must be paramount. Local people don’t want to lose their countryside to urban sprawl, or see the vital green lungs around their towns and cities lost to unnecessary development.” [Translation: “We know the NIMBYs are wrong really, but they might go and vote for UKIP, so at all costs we are going to say and do whatever it takes to get the Tory defectors back into fold, even though it makes a complete nonsense of our pledge to get more houses built. Getting ourselves re-elected has to come first.”]
Uncle Eric and his friends have suddenly re-discovered ‘Localism’ and are claiming that “Local Plans are now at the heart of the reformed, democratic planning system, so councils can decide where development should and shouldn’t go in consultation with local people.”.
Planning officers can naturally be expected to take a more objective view of these matters, because they have to work out a way of planning for the housing needs of their localities, but this had led them (unsurprisingly) to recommend to their authorities that some Green Belt land will have to be released in order to meet objectively assessed targets (even though these are no longer set by central government.) But to counter this, the government’s on-line guidance has been amended to read that assessing need is just the first stage in the preparation of a council’s local plan, and that in assessing the suitability of land to meet the identified need for housing over the plan period, they “should take account of any constraints such as Green Belt which indicate that development should be restricted and which may restrain the ability of an authority to meet its need”.
This makes it quite clear that having objectively assessed housing need in their area, LPAs should feel free to ignore it, if is politically inexpedient to release green field sites (and particularly some parts of the Green Belt) in order to allocate sufficient land to meet their housing need. If this advice is to be taken at face value, it would appear that the government is abandoning the requirement that LPAs must demonstrate that they have a five-year housing land supply, plus a 5% margin (six years’ supply in cases where council’s have failed to produce sufficient housing land in the past, in the form of committed schemes) if they can excuse themselves by pointing to constraints such as the Green Belt (or any other plausible excuses). It also seems to let them off the hook of having to co-operate with neighbouring authorities in the provision of housing land, even though the 2011 Act requires them to do.
This is bad news for house-builders, and it is bad news for first-time buyers. It also makes a nonsense of recent legislative and policy changes which were directed at securing the provision of adequate housing land. But then, as I said, we are now in the run-up to the General Election, and I did predict a major U-turn sooner or later in this pre-election period. This latest ministerial statement seems to herald that U-turn, and there will no doubt be more to come, as an increasingly panic-stricken Tory Party thrashes about trying to find something, anything, that might secure a few more votes and get them across the winning line next May.”
Source: http://planninglawblog.blogspot.co.uk/