Regeneration projects in Devon and Torbay have been awarded more than £8.4 million of Government funding.

www.devon.gov.uk

The Devon and Torbay One Public Estate Partnership has announced that it has received £7,056,470 of Brownfield Land Release Funding (BLRF), and £1,360,474 of Self and Custom Build Grant funding to help drive economic recovery.

Councils are supported through the One Public Estate programme to deliver initiatives which create economic growth by unlocking land for new homes and jobs; providing new opportunities to save on running costs or generating income funding; or transforming services.

The Devon & Torbay One Public Estate partnership is made up of 10 local authorities (Devon County Council, East Devon District Council, Exeter City Council, Mid Devon District Council, North Devon Council, South Hams District Council, Teignbridge District Council, Torbay Council, Torridge District Council and West Devon Borough Council) as well as the Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership, Devon & Cornwall Police, Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service, the NHS, and South Western Ambulance Service.

Councillor Rufus Gilbert, Cabinet Member for Economic Recovery and Skills, said:

“The Devon and Torbay OPE Partnership has successfully received the full amount of its bid in this latest round of funding, highlighting the benefits of working closely together. All of these schemes will regenerate and redevelop sites to open up opportunities for housing and economic growth as we look to ensure a strong recovery right across Devon.”

The successful bids for BLRF Funding are:

Exeter City Council –

Exeter City Council has been awarded £5,966,470 for the following sites:

• Cathedral and Quay car park

• Mary Arches car park

• Bonhay Meadows

• Belle Isle

• Exeter Canal Basin

Councillor Laura Wright, Deputy Leader of Exeter City Council, said: “This is excellent news for Exeter. This funding will help kick-start some very innovative housing projects which have been identified for key strategic sites in Exeter. We need to create more quality homes in the city but, to protect the greenfield ridges surrounding Exeter, we need to prioritise building on previously developed brownfield sites. So it is excellent news that the funding is now in place to further progress these important schemes.”

Torbay Council –

Torbay Council is receiving £675,000 for the redevelopment of Brixham town centre multi-storey car park and £415,000 to carry out groundworks at Torre Marine.

The multi-storey car park was demolished in 2004. It is hoped that this funding can help deliver a scheme that will see up to 70 residential units built on site. The project will address the aspirations of residents by bringing forward more affordable housing in the area. The new housing will be built without the loss of any car parking spaces, delivering on Brixham’s Town Centre Regeneration Strategy.

Torre Marine has been the subject of various planning consents over the years but none have been delivered. The funding will be used to try to develop a viable scheme to build 78 Assisted Living care units to be maintained and managed by a registered provider. The aim of the project is to address an under supply of extra care units within Torbay, helping to reduce waiting lists for such specialist accommodation and improving health outcomes for residents.

Councillor Steve Darling, Leader of Torbay Council, said: “It is fantastic that Torbay has secured this funding to allow us to hopefully accelerate the development of these two key sites, if initial investigation works go to plan. In Torbay this summer we have seen record numbers on our housing waiting list and a severe shortage of care accommodation. The lack of housing supply has created a housing crisis in Torbay, therefore a project to accelerate the building of new housing is great news for our residents and local community.”

The Self and Custom Build Grant Funding has been awarded to:

Teignbridge District Council –

Howton Field £585,474

Orchard Lane £275,000

Teignbridge District Council Executive member for housing, Councillor Martin Wrigley, welcomed the funding: “Custom and self-build homes are an attractive option for many people so receiving funding to cover some of the high infrastructure costs on these council owned sites is welcomed. Our plans for 10 – 20 custom build homes at Howton Field near Newton Abbot are well advanced with planning permission already achieved.

“The Orchard Lane site at Dawlish was highlighted in our recent local plan sites option consultation and so any building would be subject to the outcome of that consultation, member consideration and approval as well as planning permission being sought for around six affordable custom or self build homes. If approved, some of the funding would enable us to offset the open space loss by improving play equipment on a nearby site.”

North Devon Council –

Bicclescombe depot £500,000

This government grant is going to enable North Devon Council to deliver the necessary groundworks and infrastructure to release the former Bicclescombe Depot site in Ilfracombe for up to 15 serviced building plots, including affordable housing. It is a great opportunity to open up a site to local residents to build their own homes, but it needs this up-front investment to make it suitable for housing.

There are over a hundred people on North Devon’s register seeking suitable building plots so there is demand for this type of opportunity. Once the Council has secured outline planning permission and delivered the infrastructure, individual serviced plots will be made available for those wishing to physically self-build their own home or those who wish to commission a new home that is delivered by professionals on behalf of new homeowners following a collaboration between a developer and an owner to design or customise their home to suit their individual needs.

North Devon Council’s Lead Member for Economic Regeneration, Councillor Malcolm Prowse, says: “This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to bring this site back to life and offer local people a chance to build their own homes. This site has long been a thorn in our side due to the complications on site making it unviable but thanks to this government investment, we can finally overcome all of those hurdles to the benefit of the community and the local economy.”

Almost £58 million has been allocated by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) to councils across the country to develop brownfield land into quality housing to help people onto the property ladder while transforming derelict local areas.

An innovative scheme which has allowed Devon’s district councils to improve their kerbside waste collection services and improve recycling rates has won a national award.

eastdevon.gov.uk

The Devon Authorities Shared Saving Scheme was recognised as the ‘Best New Idea’ at the Local Authority Recycling Advisory Committee (LARAC) Celebration Awards 2021.

The award was accepted by Devon County Council working with and on behalf of five of Devon’s waste collection authorities, East Devon, Mid Devon, North Devon, Teignbridge and Torridge District Councils.

The scheme has led to savings of £6.8m in treatment costs for the County Council, and half of this extra money has been shared back with the five District Councils which has enabled them to improve their waste collection services.

It has also increased recycling rates for those authorities and improved recycling collection services for over 250,000 Devon households.

The Scheme has allowed the five authorities to change their kerbside collections knowing that savings that they generate in cheaper treatment costs or a reduction in waste volumes will be shared back with them to fund further initiatives and improvements.

It has also supported the introduction of separate weekly food waste collections and partly subsidised separate garden waste collections which has improved the amount of food waste collected.

Average recycling levels within the five District Council areas have improved overall from 47.9% to 55.2% with a reduction in waste volumes of 25kg/head (6%).

Councillor Roger Croad, DCC’s cabinet member responsible for waste said:

Congratulations to Devon County Council’s waste team for delivering this innovative scheme and our district council colleagues – this is a great example of Devon’s councils working together. It has improved local services for more than a quarter of a million people and it’s great that it has been nationally recognised.”

Councillor Geoff Jung, the chair of the Devon Authorities Strategic Waste Committee (DASWC) and East Devon District Council portfolio holder for Coast, Country and Environment said:

I’m delighted that Devon’s councils have been recognised nationally. It shows yet again that by pooling our expertise and knowledge for the greater good of Devon we can, increase efficiency, improve recycling rates and reduce costs to enable us to continue to improve the services we can offer.”

A leading national charity is calling on the UK government to ban some domestic flights and do more to promote rail as a greener alternative to help tackle climate change.

Rob O’Connor www.infrastructure-intelligence.com 

The increasingly influential Campaign for Better Transport is calling for measures to curb the number of domestic flights with a ban on certain routes and the equivalent train journey made cheaper, along with mandatory emissions labelling on airplane tickets. It also wants to see Air Passenger Duty (APD) maintained – rather than cut in the upcoming Budget as the government has indicated it might – and a frequent flyer levy introduced.

The plan would mean an end to flights between Manchester and London, London and Edinburgh, and Birmingham and Glasgow, with people offered cheaper train tickets instead, and anyone taking more than three international flights a year would be required to pay a frequent flyer levy.

Paul Tuohy, Campaign for Better Transport’s chief executive, said: “Cheap domestic flights might seem a good deal when you buy them, but they are a climate disaster, generating seven times more harmful greenhouse emissions than the equivalent train journey. Making the train cheaper will boost passenger numbers and help reduce emissions from aviation, but any cut to air passenger duty – coupled with a rise in rail fares in January – will send the wrong message about how the government wants people to travel and mean more people choosing to fly. The government has led the way with bold climate ambitions, now it needs to take similarly bold actions to make those ambitions a reality.”

Campaign for Better Transport is calling for the following measures to help tackle climate change, reduce carbon emissions from aviation and boost rail passenger numbers:

• A ban on all domestic flights where the equivalent train journey is under five hours; [This would rule out domestic flights from Exeter to London, Manchester, Leeds and put Norwich on the borderline – Owl]
• Cheaper trains tickets to compete with budget airlines;
• No cut to Air Passenger Duty and a frequent flyer levy on international flights in the upcoming Budget;
• Stop all plans for airport expansion until ‘net zero flights’ are a reality;
• Make airlines label their tickets with comparison train emissions so that people can make informed choices.

Campaign for Better Transport is warning that without further measures to help reduce emissions from transport, the UK will struggle to meet its climate commitments. With the Budget falling just days before the start of the UN Climate Conference COP26 in Glasgow, the charity warns that any cut to APD will damage the UK’s environmental credibility ahead of the international conference.

The charity argues that many of the most popular domestic flight can be completed by direct train instead, bringing the UK closer to achieving net zero carbon emission. When check in and landing times are factored in, many of the journeys take a similar amount of time by train, but the charity argues one of the reasons people fly is the cost of the equivalent train journey and that more could be done to ensure rail is always the cheaper option.

To prove the benefits of travelling by train, Campaign for Better Transport’s Paul Tuohy and Norman Baker, a former Lib-Dem MP and transport minister in the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition government between 2010-2013, ‘raced’ from London’s Piccadilly Circus to George’s Square in Glasgow on Friday 8 October by plane and train respectively. Door to door the plane journey was two minutes quicker but released almost seven times the amount of greenhouse gases.

Yesterday Owl wondered why Dominic Raab had not intervened in the spat between the Treasury and Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy mistakenly thinking that this might be part of the “Deputy Prime Minister” job description. Wrong! – Owl

Dominic Raab Not In Charge Of Country While Boris Johnson Holidays In Marbella

Sophia Sleigh www.huffingtonpost.co.uk 

The new deputy prime minister Dominic Raab is not in charge of running the country while Boris Johnson is on holiday, No10 has said. 

Dominic Raab was demoted from his post of foreign secretary but handed the title of deputy prime minister amid a tussle in the recent reshuffle.

But despite Raab being made second-in-command, the prime minister’s official spokesman insisted today that Boris Johnson continues to be “in charge” while he is on holiday.

The PM is currently holidaying with his family in Marbella, Spain, following the Tory party conference in Manchester last week.

Asked if Raab would step in to run the country, the spokesman replied: “As you’ve seen, the prime minister continues to be in charge as is always the case.

“The deputy prime minister has an important role to play and including in stepping up for the prime minister in parliament.

“Obviously we’re in recess at the moment, but as you’ll have seen the prime minister has taken some calls with leaders already today and there’ll be others to follow.”

The spokesman said Raab, who is also the justice secretary, was not currently on holiday. 

Raab previously came under fire for his family break in Crete when he was foreign secretary as Afghanistan fell to the Taliban amid the withdrawal of western troops.

Johnson has also been criticisied for taking his holiday during the ongoing energy crisis which has left some industries reliant on gas warning of shutdowns over the winter.

But Downing Street defended Johnson’s decision to go away, saying he was continuing to work on government business.

“The prime minister continues to be in charge as is always the case,” the spokesman said.

From an environmentalist:

The Environment Agency require two East Devon Landowners to pay substantial fees for environmental damage and two environmental charities benefit £106,000.

The Environment Agency rather than taking offending companies and individuals to court for environmental infringements often apply for civil sanctions known as “Enforcement Undertakings”

When the EA decide to impose a sanction, they apply the same safeguards as when they decide to prosecute. They will make sure that the recipient of a notice understands the case against them by setting out the alleged offence and the reasons for the proposed sanctions.

They also consider the victims and third parties (where they are known to them) whose interests have been adversely impacted by the alleged environmental incident. 

The Environment Agency will 

• ensure that affected third parties are appropriately compensated. 
• encourage offenders to engage with the local community, assess and fully remediate the impacts of the environmental incident. 

Both infringements in East Devon that the Environment Agency has reported are for sanctions concluded in the last 6 months (Between April and Sept) are in the parish of Woodbury. 

Mr Richard H Parr of Higher Bagmores Farm in Woodbury has agreed to a sum of £82,000. 

The offence was for operating without an “Environmental Permit” for a waste operation – Regulation 38(1) to the disposal of waste at Higher Bagmores Farm, Woodbury between June 2016, and March 2018. Mr Parr has also agreed to carry out restoration work, to obtain advice from an external consultants, to cease all waste movements into the site, complete construction of silage clamps on his site and to cover the Environment Agency’s costs.

Mr Parr has agreed that his contribution of £82,000 to go to North Devon Biosphere Foundation which is the Management Strategy which coordinates the delivery of the Action Plan for North Devon’s UNESCO Biosphere Reserve.  Their stated aims are to provide biodiversity and visitor added value function on the Tarka Trail between Braunton and Meeth and on Cycle Way 27 between Willingcott and Ilfracombe and to add further value for the North Devon and Torridge sections of the South West Coast Path

F W S Carter & Sons Limited of Greendale Business Park and owners of Hogsbrook Farm in Woodbury Salterton has agreed to a sum of £24000.

The offence was for operating without an “Environmental Permit” for a water discharge activity and waste operation – Regulation 38(1). It relates to sewage pollution on Grindle Brook and burning of waste at Hogsbrook Farm, Woodbury Salterton, Devon in May 2019.

The owners of Hogsbrook farm have also agreed to the diversion of roof water, the carrying out daily the monitoring and emptying of storage tanks, to implement a new farm waste management strategy, with an assigned responsible person, to construct a new covered area, and to cover the Environment Agency’s costs.

The Owners have also agreed to contribute £24,000 to Westcountry Rivers Trust. 

The West Country Rivers Trust is a charity set up in 1984 whose aim is to restore and protect the rivers, lakes, and estuaries of the Westcountry for the benefit of nature, people, and local economies and helping our Westcountry rivers flow freely and teem with life, while valuing our most precious of resources, water. 

Correspondence received from Cllr. John Loudoun, Ward Member,Sidmouth Rural 

Planning Application: 21/1723/MRES subsequent to 18/1094/MOUT

Following the appeal hearing in front of a planning inspector in July 2019, the planning application 18/1094/MOUT to build a business park on the land east of Two Bridges Road at Sidford was upheld. This provided the applicants with outline planning permission to progress with building there. The inspector’s decision left only the scale of the site’s infrastructure and its appearance to be determined at a later date by the District Council.

The scale of the buildings is now covered by this latest planning application, 21/1723/MRES. I understand that the appearance of the buildings, their architecture, will still remain to be decided upon at a later date, probably in early 2022.

The applicants have over recent months, as will be evident from looking at the site, been undertaking some significant preliminary landscaping and flood alleviation work, not least straightening the course of the brook that flows through the site.

As the District Councillor for Sidmouth Rural Ward within which this site is located, I attended a site meeting on 1 October with fellow Sidford Ward District Councillor, Marianne Rixson, to meet with the applicants’ agent, Joseph Marchant. We wanted to look at what works have been undertaken so far and to understand where the proposed buildings would be located.

The site has clearly had significant works undertaken so far and to my mind the works look as if the applicants are doing what has been required of them. Indeed, we were told that in the southern third of the site where the flood improvement works have taken place there will soon be about 2,200 native trees planted there. I understand that across the remainder of the site considerably more trees and planting will eventually take place. We were assured that as a result of all of the planting the site will become more ecologically rich than when it was a field.

I believe that the applicants’ intentions are that building work would not commence for probably another 24 months allowing the initial planting to mature.

I understand that the flood improvement work will make the site less liable to future flooding allowing a greater flow of water through the site, reducing potential flooding in local lower lying areas.

I noted that all the current ground levels of the flood improvement area would be its future ground levels. The plans submitted with the latest application show the cut and fill across the site to create the base levels.

When trying to understand where the buildings would be located and their scale, we were able to use the “Proposed Block Plan” site plan that is part of the latest application’s document submissions to the District Council.

The key information about the buildings that I took from our discussions was –

• The site layout, as set out in the Block Plan, is the same as included in the previous 2018 application, and there will be fewer buildings than originally proposed when the site was reviewed as part of the 2012 Local Plan process.
• Many of the buildings will now be a storey lower than had been proposed in 2012 and are as proposed in the 2018 application. The planning inspector included this detail in Condition 4 of his decision.
• The ridge heights of the buildings will be roughly no higher than those of the bungalows facing the site on Two Bridges Road, with the exception of the two larger buildings at the front of the site (coloured red and light blue on the Block Plan) that would be about the same height as the former police house facing them on Two Bridges Road;
• All the buildings, with the exception of two larger ones (coloured red and light blue on the Block Plan) closest to the Two Bridges Road, will be single storey at heights of about 5 metres to their eaves and 6 to 6.5 metres at their ridges.
• The two larger buildings will be two storey office buildings at a height of about 6 metres to their eves and about 7.5 metres to their ridges.
• The buildings’ height detail was covered at the planning inspector’s hearing.

In the run up to the site meeting Mr Marchant provided me with an informal letter in which he set out the applicants’ intentions and approach to the final phases of developing the site. Mr Marchant’s intention was to try to ease any remaining local resident concerns about what is, and will, be happening at the site, and he has allowed me to reproduce the content of his letter. His letter is below –

“As you know, in late 2019, we sought to vary the Conditions on the Appeal Decision in order to allow the landscape works to be brought forward early. The original Inspector’s Conditions meant that no implementation could occur until all designs for the buildings and other built elements were in place. The adjustment to the wording meant that we were able to bring forward the archaeological dig and the earthworks to secure the flood benefits, along with the landscape provision for new trees, hedges, new Devon banks and the meadow as early as possible, such that the landscape has a chance to mature as soon as it can. The applicants and I could see the benefit of landscaping maturing as soon as possible.

As I explained to you, having worked in this industry for over 25 years, I do know that in most cases where development is proposed, local residents are naturally concerned with impact. Where planting or the level of landscape to be provided is a significant element, this is not always fully appreciated or understood by local people, and, in some cases, averting this misunderstanding can reduce concern. I am conscious that understanding plans of the site remains a difficulty for some. With the benefit of the earthworks related to the landscape area, the new Devon banks, the flood basin and the enclosure to the tree zones of the site, it is now possible to depict where the planting will occur and therefore to more easily interpret the plans. I am pleased that you have agreed to view these works with me.

It may be that the turfing and tree and hedge planting will have started when we visit the site. The seeding has already occurred. This is the meadow rich seed mix for the main flood improvement area. Turfing is due to start at the end of this week and into next. In respect of the Devon banks along Laundry Lane, until recently, it has not been possible to lay this turf due to the dry weather, such that it would survive. With recent heavy rain, we can now proceed with this. The tree planting will also start in coming days. My understanding is that over 2200 trees and hedge whips have been ordered and will be planted across the site as planned. The ambition is that by the early spring of next year, these planted elements will be well established and will have a full growing season ahead of them next year. Some of the trees that will go onto the site will be quite significant in size and hopefully within a year or two, will have a significant impact.

I would hope that on the site visit, we can look at this element of the investment, such that you can advise any local people that may come to you with queries. I think it will also be of significant interest to see just how much open space is allotted to the development, which I think will be of comfort to many local people. Again, this is an element that I think may have been under appreciated from the technical documents. A site visit should bring this to life.

The second issue which I think has been of concern to many local people, has been the worry that the development may be overbearing in its height. As you know, the recent appeal scheme detailed the layout, which is fully approved. The height of the ridges and eaves was supplied as an indicative figure. This indicative figure enabled the modelling of the Landscape Impact Assessment. As you are aware, the greater majority of the development is single storey. A few buildings are two storeys.

The concern of many local people was that the scale of the buildings may expand to more closely represent the scheme that was supported by the Inspector in the 2012 Local Plan Inquiry. This was a much denser scheme. To put to bed that concern, I can confirm that the scale, as now submitted, will be as detailed in the LVIA of the appeal scheme, to exactly the heights that were identified at that stage.

The current Reserved Matter application will hopefully avoid a worry from local residents that somehow the Reserved Matter would be submitted showing two and three storey buildings across the site. The scale that is shown in the Reserved Matters application which is currently submitted is as low as possible, particularly given that the greater majority of buildings are single storey.

My hope is that a combination of a large part of the landscape being in the ground, and a confirmed position from the applicant on the scale of buildings, will mean that those most affected by the development will hopefully obtain some peace of mind, knowing that the single storey scale of the majority of buildings, to match exactly with L002 Rev A and SK001, and the positioning and extent of landscape works will mean that the development is much less impacting than they had anticipated, giving regard to residents’ outlook and relationship with the development site.

I look forward to being able to explore these things with you so that when you are approached by local people, you are able to put them at ease”.

I have been asked by some residents about what they might usefully say as part of the consultation on the latest application, for which the closing date is 14 October. The application and its supporting documents are accessible at –

https://planning.eastdevon.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=QV41TVGHFQE0 0

Given that the latest application is in effect about scale, I hope that the information that I have obtained will assist residents as they consider whether they are reassured by the scale of the buildings. Whatever residents’ opinions on the latest application, these can be made directly to the District Council as part of its current consultation process.

Further, I hope that Mr Marchant’s letter is helpful to residents and that the wider information I have set out here is also useful.

Since this note was drafted the Sidmouth Town Council’s Planning Committee has met and considered this application. It was unable to support the application giving its reasons as –

UNABLE TO SUPPORT

The Council continues to oppose the establishment of employment land in this location but subsequent to the approval on appeal by the Planning Inspectorate, viewed the application regarding scale without prejudice.

Members were unable to support the application regarding scale as they felt that the location of larger and taller buildings (Blocks N & K) closer and more prominently next to the road was detrimental to the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. They suggested that those buildings could be relocated further back into the site so that the height and size of buildings increased as the distance increased from the main roadway.

As a member of this Committee, I participated in the discussions and I and share its concerns about the scale of the two higher buildings at the front of the site and would welcome anything that could be done to reduce their scale.

[Formal closing date for public comments on 21/1723/MRES is 14 October]

The Times argues in its leader that Boris Johnson derives a break: “it will have escaped no one’s notice that having expended so much energy on jokes in his speech, he had nothing left in the tank for policies.”

[Who is funding the tank refuel, they are getting very expensive these days? – Owl]

• Common Ash (T003) : Fell to ground level. Common ash (T005) : Fell to ground level. Common ash (T006): Fell. Retain trunk at 3m in height for habitat. Common ash (T007) : Crown clean. Common ash (T008) : Fell. Retain trunk at 3 m in height for habitat. Willow (T009) : Crown reduce by 2-2.5 M to reduce lever arm forces on pollard points and cavitated trunk. Common ash (T012) : Laterally reduce lower branches by 2-2.5 m to reduce weight on leaning trunk. Pedunculate oak (T013) : Crown clean. Common ash (T014) : Fell. Retaining trunk at 5 m in height for habitat. Common alder (T015) : Turn into standing deadwood monolith by reducing larger upper canopy branches by 2.5-3 metres Reason: Appropriate arboricultural management Land At Tillhouse Road (Cranbrook Country Park) Tillhouse Road Cranbrook DevonRef. No: 21/2622/TRE | Validated: Fri 01 Oct 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Proposed side extension and rear extension. 7 Gulliford Close Lympstone Exmouth Devon EX8 5DGRef. No: 21/2613/FUL | Validated: Fri 01 Oct 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Two storey side extension, alterations and car parking. Highridge Lyme Road Axminster EX13 5BQRef. No: 21/2597/FUL | Validated: Fri 01 Oct 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• (T1) Removal of 4x holly stems road side showing increasing signs of deadwood. Approximately 10m tall. Lots of deadwood road side and showing signs of dieback whilst leaning towards the main road. (T2) 2m reduction in height on Birch tree with long extending limbs. To be reduced by about 2.5m leaving the tree approximately 10m tall. Woodcote Charmouth Road Axminster EX13 5SZRef. No: 21/2607/TRE | Validated: Fri 01 Oct 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Change of use from garage to home office with external alterations to include fixed glazing and two roof lights to the southern elevation and folding/sliding doors and glazing to the gable of the west elevation Maple House Bickwell Valley Sidmouth EX10 8SGRef. No: 21/2595/FUL | Validated: Thu 30 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Creation of a driveway to replace existing front garden. 8 Bridgefield Ottery St Mary EX11 1HLRef. No: 21/2601/FUL | Validated: Thu 30 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Conversion of two agricultural buildings to a single storey dwelling and associated works. St Andrews Harp Lane Aylesbeare Exeter EX5 2JLRef. No: 21/2592/PDQ | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Steel framed apex lean-to building. Coombeshead Farm Dalwood Axminster EX13 7HSRef. No: 21/2586/AGR | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• G1 Group of 8 lime trees repollard at historical pollard points retaining branch collars and maximum cut diameter of 65 mm To allow more light in to the understory following best arboricultural practices. Applehayes Oakhill East Budleigh Budleigh Salterton EX9 7DWRef. No: 21/2585/TRE | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• T1 Turkey Oak , T3 English Oak – Reduce second and third order branches by 2.5 meters to suitable pruning point leaving a balanced shape following best arboricultural practices. The trees will have a Finnished height of approximately 10 meters and a radial spread of 4 meters with a maximum cut diameter of 75mm. T2 Oak fell This tree is a heavily suppressed specimen growing between T1 & T3 removal of the tree would allow more light into the property and allow for replanting on the hedge bank. 14 Durham Close Exmouth EX8 5QURef. No: 21/2584/TRE | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Direct replacement of an existing single skinned steel oil storage tank in very poor condition with a new double skinned (bunded) plastic oil storage tank Higher Budlake Cottage Budlake Exeter Devon EX5 3JRRef. No: 21/2591/FUL | Validated: Fri 01 Oct 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Variation of condition 2 (approved plans) of planning permission 14/1144/FUL (Demolition of barns and erection of ancillary building housing swimming pool and car parking, erection of replacement dwelling and retention of pond.) to allow for alternative design of approved replacement dwelling Knowle Farm Colyton EX24 6SGRef. No: 21/2574/VAR | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single-storey front extension. 16 Springfield Road Exmouth EX8 3JXRef. No: 21/2572/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• T1 Pine. Fell T2 Holly. Fell Redstock Bickwell Valley Sidmouth EX10 8SQRef. No: 21/2579/TCA | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Installation of covered swimming pool (amendment scheme to application 21/1255/FUL) Field View Slade Farm Slade Road Ottery St Mary EX11 1QNRef. No: 21/2576/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Conversion of agricultural field to car park and addition of a 125m hedgerow. Wildwood Escot Escot Park Ottery St Mary EX11 1LURef. No: 21/2569/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Certificate of lawfulness for the demolition of existing garage, construction of new garage and ground floor rear extension and internal alterations.4 Claredale Road Exmouth EX8 2EERef. No: 21/2570/CPL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Condition 3 – Within 3 months of the date of this permission a detailed plan of the track’s appearance, accessed from the road shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Land East Of Sunnyside MemburyRef. No: 21/1107/DOC3 | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Erection of an agricultural workers dwelling and associated infrastructure Sunnylands Dalwood Axminster EX13 7EARef. No: 21/2562/FUL | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Conversion of greenhouse to form holiday accommodation The Garden House Yarcombe Honiton EX14 9AERef. No: 21/2556/LBC | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Demolition of existing conservatory and porch, construction of single storey wrap around extension. Victoria Dairy Barrow Road Payhembury Honiton EX14 3HXRef. No: 21/2557/FUL | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Change of use of disused recreational land to garden use in association with 4 and 5 cranford close 42 Salterton Road Exmouth EX8 2EQRef. No: 21/2566/FUL | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• First floor side and rear extension over existing garage and study Heatherdale Talaton Exeter EX5 2RARef. No: 21/2554/FUL | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Side extension of existing single garage to be converted into a double garage. 1 Temple Mews Temple Street Sidmouth EX10 9AXRef. No: 21/2555/FUL | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• T1, Beech : reduce by 1 – 2m via thinning second and third order branches to leave a natural form with a height of approximately 14m and a spread of 5m. T2, Birch : light reduction by 0.5 – 1m of second and third order branches to leave a natural form with a height of approximately 12m and a spread of 3m. Gaunts Sid Road Sidmouth EX10 9AFRef. No: 21/2551/TCA | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Retention of satellite dish on west lawn and raising of the chimney above woodburning stove Oak Tree Cottage Combe Raleigh Honiton EX14 4UQRef. No: 21/2546/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Partial demolition of existing side extension with flat roof, and erection of a single storey side extension. Meadow Lea Boughmore Road Sidmouth EX10 8SHRef. No: 21/2542/FUL | Validated: Sun 03 Oct 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey side extension. 2 Church Lane Feniton Honiton EX14 3BYRef. No: 21/2547/FUL | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey rear extension Boycombe Farm Farway Colyton EX24 6EGRef. No: 21/2537/LBC | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey rear extension Boycombe Farm Farway Colyton EX24 6EGRef. No: 21/2536/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Two storey side extension 5 The Burlands Feniton Honiton EX14 3UNRef. No: 21/2533/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Change of use of land to the siting of 15 self-storage units Bottom Barn Broadhembury Honiton EX14 3LNRef. No: 21/2530/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Notification for prior approval of change of use from Commercial, Business and Service (Use Class E) to Dwellinghouses (Use Class C3) under Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 Former Natwest Victoria Place Axminster EX13 5ABRef. No: 21/2540/PDMA | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Demolition of existing conservatory, erection of a single storey rear extension and Installation of a garden terrace Woodstock Woodbury Exeter EX5 1JDRef. No: 21/2535/FUL | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Re-instatement of door between kitchen and living room and new partion wall in living room to create pantry off the kitchen Laburnum Cottage Smallridge Axminster EX13 7LYRef. No: 21/2538/LBC | Validated: Thu 30 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Retrospective installation of two storage containers in yard area for a five year period Unit 4 The Harbour Axmouth Seaton EX12 4AARef. No: 21/2521/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Replacement dwelling Courtlands (Eden Turf) Dulford Cullompton EX15 2EQRef. No: 21/2523/FUL | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Application Reference Number: 20/1838/MFUL Date of Decision: 18/06/2021 – Condition Number(s): 2. – Conditions(s) Removal: To accommodate design amendments with the view to improve the quality and deliverability of the approved scheme. Drawing replacement. Eldin House Fairfield Road ExmouthRef. No: 21/2517/VAR | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Details of layout, scale, landscaping and appearance of the building and the means of access thereto, pursuant to outline planning permission 18/1196/OUT (Outline application for two bedroom detached bungalow with off street parking space, and demolition of existing building) Land North Of Macwood Drive SeatonRef. No: 21/2499/RES | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Reserved Matters Application (access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale) for construction of 150 dwellings including affordable housing, landscaping, allotments, NEAP and associated site infrastructure; pursuant to outline planning permission reference 17/1019/MOUT. The proposal includes the discharge of conditions 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 28, 34, 36 and 37 of outline planning permission reference 17/1019/MOUT Land North Of Old Tithebarn Lane Clyst HonitonRef. No: 21/2490/MRES | Validated: Fri 01 Oct 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Erection of an outbuilding 43 Elmores Well Avenue Tithebarn Exeter Devon EX1 3XGRef. No: 21/2487/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Change of use of holiday let to dwelling Goldcombe Farmhouse Gittisham Honiton EX14 3ABRef. No: 21/2474/FUL | Validated: Mon 27 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Cleaning of War Memorial (listed building) using approved methods, re-cutting and re-painting of letters as required, removal of flagpole and fixings and making good. Minor aesthetic works and improvements to curtilage. Chardstock War Memorial Chardstock EX13 7BSRef. No: 21/2461/LBC | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Retrospective erection of protectapet fence barrier along fence perimeter 34 Monmouth Way Honiton EX14 2GYRef. No: 21/2452/FUL | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Addition of fibre cement weatherboard to front apex of house and application of render to present brickwork on the front elevation 10 St Marys Park Ottery St Mary EX11 1JARef. No: 21/2385/FUL | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Replacement & relocation of fuel tank in garden; replacement of felt roof to extension with single ply membrane with sedum finish 26 Bell Street Otterton Budleigh Salterton EX9 7HSRef. No: 21/2348/FUL | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Replacement & relocation of fuel tank in garden, Replacement of felt roof to extension with single ply membrane with sedum finish 26 Bell Street Otterton Budleigh Salterton EX9 7HSRef. No: 21/2349/LBC | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Single storey side extension, reduction in length of garage to install patio area at rear of property 2 Whitehayes Close Kilmington Axminster EX13 7RRRef. No: 21/2233/FUL | Validated: Tue 28 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Installation of 4 replacement fascia signs St Bridget Nurseries Ltd Clyst St Mary Exeter EX5 1AERef. No: 21/2230/ADV | Validated: Thu 30 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Off road parking in the front gardens of properties 9 & 10 Millrise. 9 Millrise Luppitt EX14 4UARef. No: 21/1922/FUL | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision

• Part demolition of existing work units, retention of brick offices and single storey extension Station Yard HeleRef. No: 21/1298/LBC | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision
• Part demolition of existing work units, retention of brick offices and single storey extension Station Yard HeleRef. No: 21/1297/FUL | Validated: Wed 29 Sep 2021 | Status: Awaiting decision

Making things up as we go along!

According to the Telegraph, Boris Johnson is reportedly now staying at a luxurious estate in southern Spain owned through a company by Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park, a government minister and close friend of the Johnsons. The house, according to reports, sleeps 13 and costs as much as £25,000 a week to rent, although it is unclear on what terms the Johnsons are staying there.

So, again according to the Telegraph, the Treasury on Sunday night accused Kwasi Kwarteng, the Business Secretary, of making misleading claims about government plans to offer an energy bailout to struggling factories.

In a series of television interviews on Sunday, Mr Kwarteng admitted that factories facing closure because of soaring energy costs was a “critical situation”.

Questioned about whether he had asked for extra money from the Treasury to support them, he said: “I have not asked for billions. We’ve got existing schemes. I’m working very closely with Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor, to get us through this situation.

“I think he showed a great deal of flexibility when he allowed £500 million to be dispersed by local authorities for vulnerable consumers, and we’re working to see what we can do in terms of protecting industry.”

However, Treasury sources issued a swift rebuke to Sky News, with one saying: “This is not the first time the BEIS [Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy] Secretary has made things up in interviews. To be crystal clear, the Treasury is not involved in any talks.”

Where is “Deputy Dawg” Dominic Raab, surely not on holiday as well? – Owl?

Radical plans for a new national care service under which health and social care would be delivered by the same organisation are being actively considered by the government for inclusion in a white paper next month, according to senior Conservatives and Whitehall sources.

Toby Helm www.theguardian.com 

The idea of local authorities and the NHS taking joint responsibility for social care, perhaps working from a single combined budget for the first time, would amount to one of the most far-reaching reforms since the NHS was founded in 1948.

At present, local authorities have responsibility for running social care services in their own areas. Critics say there is, as a result, insufficient incentive for cash-strapped councils to develop better care for people in their homes or in the community, as it is cheaper for them if those in need go into hospital where the cost is met from the separate NHS budget.

The result is that many people who could be cared for at home or in the community end up occupying much-needed hospital beds.

Similar systems operate in Wales and Northern Ireland, although there are variations in how much care is paid for by the state. The Scottish government is holding a consultation, due to end next month, on proposals for a National Care Service.

It is believed that health secretary Sajid Javid is examining how a new integrated service that would deliver better care and free up NHS beds across England could be delivered. It is understood there would be national standards for care, and conditions for carers.

The Observer has been told that prime minister Boris Johnson was keen to announce plans to integrate health and social care services last month when he revealed that National Insurance contributions would rise by 1.25 percentage points from next April, to raise £12bn a year for the NHS and social care. But at that time Downing Street remained unclear about how an integrated system could best work, so an announcement was put back.

Under the most radical option of all, local authorities would be stripped of any involvement for social care, which would come entirely under the NHS. Sources say, however, that this would involve too great an upheaval and prove hugely unpopular with councils, many of which are Tory controlled. Councils have already lost much of their responsibility over education.

Last night Tory MP and former health under-secretary Dr Dan Poulter, who works part time as an NHS psychiatrist, said: “There is a growing expectation that a substantive health and social care white paper will emerge in the next few weeks aiming to establish a national care service.

“If integration is to be a success, it is essential that reform does not just deliver parallel commissioning of health and care services but also services commissioned through a single pooled budget. Unified health and social care budgets are the only way to deliver both a more efficient health and social care system as well as properly joining up for the benefit of patients what is currently a badly fragmented system.”

Former Tory Cabinet Minister Damian Green, who has written extensively about social care added: “Running social care jointly between local authorities and the NHS would be an interesting idea but would of course still leave big questions about how you attract a bigger and better paid workforce, how you ensure appropriate housing so that people do not go prematurely into residential care.”

In his party conference speech last week, Johnson hinted at integration. He said: “In 1948, this country created the National Health Service but kept social care local. And though that made sense, in many ways generations of older people have found themselves lost in the gap.” He added it was not just about providing more money but reforming the system. “This government that got Brexit done, that is getting the vaccine rollout done is going to get social care done.”

The Covid-19 pandemic brought the social care crisis even more sharply into focus. Currently a shortage of about 120,000 care workers means 300,000 people are waiting for local authorities to assess their needs or provide care. In addition, many elderly people who end up in hospital because of poor local provision of care cannot free up beds once they are better because there are no places in residential care homes.

There are about 17,000 homes in England, most run as independent small businesses funded by local authorities or paying residents, making coordination with the large hospital trusts difficult.

Shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth said: “Social care is in desperate need of wholesale reform but the cap Boris Johnson announced fails to provide the fix he promised. It’s vital care and health services are brought closer together to provide personalised care so people can stay at home and not be forced into a home.

“That’s why I’ve long advocated national care services, locally delivered within national standards, to provide the quality care people deserve.”

Sally Warren, director of policy at the King’s Fund, said: “In reality, people mean different things when they talk about bringing social care into the NHS. For some it means having social care services delivered by the NHS. For others, it means some shared accountability for how health and care services work together. Rather than spending energy shuffling responsibilities from local government to the NHS or vice versa, the important thing is to focus on improving the coordination of services so they work together to improve health and wellbeing.”

Devon’s health and care system is under “extreme pressure” and the public is being asked to find ways not to overburden it.

Carl Eve www.devonlive.com 

A statement released by the NHS Devon Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) has highlighted the medical groups serious concerns about the current situation.

The Devon CCG – which acts as the headquarters for the NHS in the county and has a budget of more than £1.9 billion – has said that the county’s “health and social care system is under extreme pressure due to high demand for services, sustained demand for Covid beds, pressure on staffing and the need for social care exceeding the available capacity.”

The group said the pressures are being seen across the system, in mental health care, primary care (GPs) and adult social care as well as the acute hospital trusts.

Dr Paul Johnson, Chair of NHS Devon Clinical Commissioning Group said: “The NHS throughout Devon is under a significant strain at the moment because there’s a large number of people who are needing emergency care, there’s a large number of people who are in hospital who are waiting to get home, but they need carers in order to support them to get home and we haven’t got those carers available.

NHS Devon issue advice to help them cope with “extreme pressure” (Image: NHS Devon Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG))

“This means that the amount of beds and the amount of staff that we’ve got available to look after them in hospital is really limited and that means those people coming into hospital in need of care are struggling to be seen in a timely way and then we’re struggling to get them if they need to stay in hospital into a ward and onto a bed, where we can get them the care and the investigations that they need.

“So, our ask to you is really two-fold. Firstly, if you need emergency care, then just go to the right place for that care.

“Now, sometimes it would be the emergency department and you’ve absolutely got to go there.

“But other times it could be your pharmacist, your GP, or to go 111, either by dialling that or going online and getting help in a different way.

“Secondly, if you are in hospital, or you’ve got a relative in hospital who is looking to get home, just think about how quickly can you on the day they’re due to get home, get in and pick them up because the sooner they’re home, the sooner we can make a bed available for someone who’s been waiting – potentially – for several hours in the emergency department.

“Also, if they are waiting for carers to be available for them to get home, is there any way that either friends or family or relatives can support them at home, even if there’s something that we need to do to help make that possible?

“If that’s the case, then talk to your teams on the ward and we will do everything we can to get people out of hospital so that those who need those beds and that medical care can then get through the emergency department and get the treatment they need.”

Dr Johnson said the NHS in Devon “really need you (the public) to support us.”

He said: “Please ask yourself whether you have a genuine life-threatening emergency before attending an emergency department (ED).

“If you are not in the right place, you may be redirected to a more appropriate service. This is because we need to safely prioritise those with the most urgent need.

“Finally, we are seeing high numbers of children coming to hospital. There is a really useful HANDi paediatric app for advice on common childhood illnesses and when to seek help.”

The group have highlighted a number of ways the public can assist in supporting the hard-pressed services, including:

* Using your local pharmacist for minor conditions such as insect bites, ear ache and skin rashes.

* Using NHS 111 – online or by phone if you need advice or medical treatment quickly and can’t wait to see your GP. If you need to be seen by a Minor Injuries or Emergency Department they can book you in.

* Getting vaccinated against Covid-19. Have both jabs and your booster if you are eligible

* Staying away from hospitals if you have Covid symptoms, or diarrhoea and vomiting

The Devon CCG said other causes of pressure include some people using the emergency departments “inappropriately”, high numbers of staff off-work due to Covid or other reasons and a high number of vacancies in the current competitive jobs market.

The group added: “The enhanced infection prevention and control measures that were implemented during the height of the pandemic has been reduced to some extent, but are still higher than before the pandemic and mean we can treat fewer people in the same time period than in normal times.

“The NHS is working hard to address pressures across the system by promoting the most appropriate places to seek medical help, vaccinating people against Covid-19 and through staff working long hours and extra shifts.

“Longer term measures include recruiting more staff and creating extra capacity with new theatres and diagnostic facilities in Plymouth and at the former NHS Nightingale hospital in Exeter.”

Two local interest aspects in this article: the Carters involvement and the story of skipper Dominic Welsh of Newton Poppleford. Should Simon Jupp have joined the party? – Owl

Edward Oldfield www.devonlive.com  [Extract]

Fishing has been the lifeblood of the port of Brixham on the south Devon coast for hundreds of years. And the current generation working in the industry have a message for prime minister Boris Johnson – don’t let us down again.

The fish market at Brixham is the biggest in England by the value of catch sold and around 600 fishermen are based at the port, which has seen fishing boats in its naturally sheltered waters at the southern end of Tor Bay since the Middle Ages.

Some in the industry say fishing is thriving locally, despite Brexit. The merchants, who report extra costs and delays due to new rules on exports, have a different view. And for producers of molluscs like mussels it has been a disaster, with live exports to the EU effectively blocked. The deal is still a sore point with French fishermen, who are threatening to disrupt cross-Channel trade in protest at the refusal of some licences to fish in UK waters.

The government has set aside a £100million investment fund for the industry, and has promised to replace funding that came via the EU. Now the local fishermen, who number around 600, and the workers who depend on the industry, want to see Brixham land the money to safeguard the future of their historic industry.

The picturesque harbour, with its pirate ship and backdrop of rows multi-coloured houses, has become a hotspot for tourists, and locals say its popularity is closely linked to the town’s character as a fishing port, illustrated by the branch of the restaurant Rockfish next to the entrance to the fish market.

Fishermen were some of the strongest supporters of breaking away from the European Union, convinced by the potential to take back control of the UK’s waters, and harvest more of the fish in them. But many now see the government’s trade deal and fishing agreement with the EU as falling far short of what was promised.

The town is in the constituency of Totnes MP Anthony Mangnall, who is planning to join a trawler crew overnight this weekend to find out for himself what the job involves. He has been invited aboard the Georgina of Ladram, a beam trawler that is one of the fleet’s newest, built in 2019 and operated by Waterdance, a family owned company that is part of the Exeter-based Greendale Group.

Mr Mangnall has spoken out in support of the industry in Parliament, and wants to see a fishing school set up to educate the next generation. The MP’s press release about his fishing trip says more news is expected soon about the £100 million fisheries fund “which will be beneficial to the fishing communities in Brixham, Salcombe and Dartmouth.” He says the first part of the fund has recently been announced, with £24 million of investment available to fishing businesses across the UK to develop technology, trial new gear and support world-class research.

Fishing boat skipper Dominic Welsh at Brixham Harbour (Image: Ed Oldfield/Devon Live)

The lack of an easy route into the industry was highlighted by young skipper and owner Dominic Welsh. The 31-year-old was working on the quayside at Brixham on his new boat the Southern Spirit, which represents a total investment of £1.7million.

The father-of-two, from Newton Poppleford, near Exmouth, said he left school at the age of 13, unable to read or write. He taught himself at sea, and bought his first licensed fishing boat at the age of 16. Mr Welsh has worked his way up through the industry, and is now close to the end of a £400,000 refit of his new vessel, employing 17 local workers. He is aiming to put to sea with his crew of four in around a month’s time. The Brixham-registered boat will fish in the seas around the UK, mainly for scallops, dover sole, plaice, turbot, brill and cuttlefish, mostly for export.

Mr Welsh said the industry has recovered from the setback of the pandemic, despite rules that are ‘strangling’ operators, with the area for fishing getting smaller and only a small increase in quotas in recent years, despite growing fish stocks and the promise of Brexit.

He regrets the government’s failure to secure sole fishing rights up to the 12-mile limit in British waters. But looking forward, he says the industry is thriving, and he wants to see it grow, with investment in education and training like the French are doing already. Mr Welsh said: “The industry is huge, and it would keep getting bigger, but there is not the manpower to run it.”……………….

Faced with queues at the petrol pumps; empty shelves; rising fuel prices; welfare cuts; imminent tax rises and a Prime Minister who is on holiday [or has he fled the chaos?], this seems practical advice – Owl 

Extract from Trevor Phillips interview with Kwasi Kwarteng. See more here www.radioexe.co.uk 

Asked if he would advise people to wear another woolly jumper to keep warm this winter, Mr Kwarteng said: “It’s up to people – it’s amazing how different people’s cold thresholds can be very different.

“Some people feel comfortable wrapped up in lots of different clothes, others wear relatively little – I think people should be sensible. I think people should do what they feel comfortable with.”

Pressed on whether this meant he was telling people to turn down their thermostat and put on more clothing, he said: “My job as an energy minister is not to tell people how many layers of clothing they should wear, that’s not really my job.”

….Whilst the council works out what to do with the building.

This is another Albatross seaside “regeneration” project whose genesis can be traced as far back as 2005. It was opened by the Princess Royal in 2016 and soon after claims were made that it attracted visitors in the tens of thousands.

In 2005 the Conservative “magic ingredients” of regeneration for both Exmouth and Seaton comprised: a supermarket close to the beach; a Premier Inn and an “iconic” building. The “Ocean” bowling alley in Exmouth and the Jurassic Centre in Seaton represented the “iconic” buildings.

Budleigh Salterton was “pencilled in” for a cut down version of the Ocean, using the same architect (Longboat Cafe site). Planning permission was eventually granted after a drawn out battle with objectors, spanning something like seven years, by which time the economic circumstances had drastically changed. As is now all too plain to see.

Exmouth has swallowed up over £3m of public funds for its non-commercially viable icon and now Seaton needs a minimum of £200K on top of the original £4m it cost to build with no guarantee that any business is waiting in the wings to take it on. (And, of course, we have the costs of the “no cost” spanking new EDDC HQ in Honiton)

So far Sidmouth has managed to escape.

Have these Conservative investment plans passed the test of time? Exmouth was looking to Robert Jenrick’s begging bowl before he was sacked. – Owl

Joe Ives, local democracy reporter www.radioexe.co.uk

Seaton’s Jurassic Visitors centre will remain closed while the council works out what to do with the £4.2 million building.

The centre, which opened in 2016, closed in September after Devon Wildlife Trust decided to cease acting as its operator.

The charity blamed “unique and unprecedented challenges posed by the covid-19 pandemic” as well as the need to undertake substantial, costly renovations to the attraction’s exhibitions, thought to potentially cost in the region of £200,000.

The number of people visiting dropped from 48,000 people in 2019/20 to 8,000 between March and September this year. The centre now falls under the responsibility of East Devon District Council (EDDC), which own the building.

Seaton’s Jurassic Visitors centre was an educational hub celebrating the 95-mile length of coast that stretches along east Devon and west Dorset where many fossils can be found. The coastline has World Heritage Status in recognition of its geological importance. 

The council is now exploring options including a repurposed Seaton Wetlands Visitor Centre or a ‘wetlands experience’ cycle route with hire bikes available from the centre, alongside health and wellbeing courses and activities.

EDDC is also considering leasing the building to someone who will use it as a general attraction centre, not necessarily focussed on the Jurassic Coast. The council is also discussing selling or renting the site.  If nothing happens in the coming months, the centre may be temporarily used as a café during the 2022 tourist season.

Either way, EDDC’s cabinet is setting aside £45,000 to pay for ongoing running costs of the unused building for the rest of the current financial year, which ends next March.

Speaking at a cabinet meeting this week, councillor Marianne Rixson (Independent East Devon Alliance, Sidmouth Sidford) requested that, given the centre’s hefty price tag, it should be referred to EDDC’s audit and governance committee so as to “understand the full ramifications of this failed project”, a suggestion approved unanimously by cabinet.

Echoing his colleagues concerns, Councillor Geoff Jung (Independent East Devon Alliance, Woodbury and Lympstone) said lessons needed to be learned. He added: “It was a great effort to introduce the Jurassic centre to Seaton and it really saddens me to see the facilities closed. Let’s hope we can make something out of this now. I would like to thank the Devon Wildlife Trust for their endeavours to make it a success and it’s a shame that it wasn’t.”

In a statement released after the cabinet meeting, council leader Paul Arnott (Independent East Devon Alliance, Coly Valley) blamed previous administrations and said: “We will work tirelessly to make sure that the eventual outcome is a vast improvement on what exists, and out of respect for the thousands of free hours given by Seaton people doing their best, we will make sure we find out and publish how this project was commissioned against the better judgement of so many people at the time.”

“So we’re losing £15.5 million and we’re getting £5 million back. That doesn’t seem like a good deal for the people of Devon somehow.” Opposition leader Councillor Alan Connett. 

Never rains but it pours, as a lot of support ends at the same time. John Hart’s instinctive political reaction as the rains fell in February 2020 was: “Self-help is going to be the order of the day”. Boris Johnson seems to be distancing the government from current problems as well. – Owl

Ollie Heptinstall, Local Democracy Reporter sidmouth.nub.news 

Devon County Council is to receive just over £5 million as part of the government’s household support fund for struggling families over the winter.

The money is part of a £500 million national fund and comes just days after the end of furlough and the £20 uplift in universal credit. It’s to help people struggling with the cost of food, heating, water and other essentials.

Through their local councils, residents will be able to apply for what the government says are “small grants to meet daily needs such as food, clothing and utilities”.

Announcing the news at a full meeting of Devon County Council on Thursday, Councillor Roger Croad (Conservative, Ivybridge) said: “I’m anticipating significant allocations to the districts.” The council is expecting more information about who will be eligible for support shortly.

“We’re looking at voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations supporting responses to poverty and food insecurity, the Citizens Advice Bureau, fuel advice and support, children’s centres, early help teams [and] support organisations linked to water, energy and essential supplies.”

Councillor Rob Hannaford (Labour, Exwick & St Thomas) said the money was “extremely welcome” but warned, with the current cost of living pressures on households, that “it must be spent and spent urgently”.

But opposition leader Councillor Alan Connett (Lib Dem, Exminster & Haldon) compared it to the reduction families will face as the uplift in Universal Credit ends: “This really is a case that we’ve had a fiver taken out of our pocket and we’re getting sixpence back.”

“The five million is valuable – good work will be done with it no doubt. But 14,770 individuals across Devon claiming universal credit and were getting the £20 a week uplift; those families are faced with rising fuel costs as we’ve seen. We’ve seen that they’re obviously going to see increased food costs.

“So we’re losing £15.5 million and we’re getting £5 million back. That doesn’t seem like a good deal for the people of Devon somehow.”

Echoing Cllr Connett’s remarks, Councillor Yvonne Atkinson (Labour, Alphington & Cowick) said the new fund instead of the £20 a week uplift was “really a loss to people and people will have to go and beg.”

She added: “For already desperate people, to actually force them into that – perhaps for bus journeys or where they can ill-afford to go and make that case – I think it’s deeply shocking that the £20 has been taken away and replaced by this.”

Earlier in the meeting, Cllr Croad admitted he would “probably have to agree” that the Universal Credit uplift should have continued through the winter, but said: “The chancellor would tell us the uplift on the UC is in effect about £6 billion a year and I don’t think the country could probably afford it.”

More details are expected to be announced about the fund in Devon in the coming days.

Replacing stamp duty and council tax with a proportional property tax – an idea discussed by Lord Willetts [given the nickname “Two Brains” in the 1990s – Owl].

Brexit may have finally been replaced by net zero and levelling up as the main topic of conversation, but one thing remains constant as the Conservative Party conference reconvened this week — housing is still at the top of the agenda.

Carol Lewis, Emanuele Midolo www.thetimes.co.uk 

Not unsurprisingly for a party with the slogan “build back better”, there was a focus on construction: from the housing secretary Michael Gove’s promises to build on brownfield sites in the Midlands and the north, to the charity Shelter’s banners adorning the buildings outside Manchester’s convention centre telling the prime minister the solution to the housing emergency was to build social housing. With more than 100 mentions of the words “housing” and “homes” the Tories’ agenda was clear.

UK construction statistics published this week showed that building faltered in September amid a lack of materials and staff. However, in a small room high above the trade hall — away from the TV crews, the party faithful and stall holders — delegates at a fringe event, hosted by the think tank Bright Blue and the campaign group Fairer Share, had alighted on a solution.

Lord Willetts, the president of the Resolution Foundation’s advisory council, and Aaron Bell, the MP for Newcastle-under-Lyme, were among those discussing how replacing stamp duty and council tax with a proportional property tax could release up to 600,000 homes into the market over the next five years without the need to lift a single brick. [Source seems to be Fair Share Campaign – Owl]

The tax — an annual charge equivalent to 0.48 per cent of a property’s value, rising to 0.96 per cent for second homes and foreign-owned homes — would release an additional 315,000 properties through extra market activity plus 135,000 second homes and 55,000 empty homes over five years, as well as 90,000 houses to be built on undeveloped plots. Some 255,000 of these would be one and two-bedroom homes suitable for first-time buyers, according to the groups.

Construction was not forgotten though, with the tax forcing an additional 90,000 more homes to be built as developers were spurred into action by the tax instigated at the point of planning permission to combat land banking.

Overall, the tax would mean 76 per cent of homeowners in England would be better off, with any increase compared with council tax capped at £100 per month. But most importantly, explained Andrew Dixon, the founder of Fairer Share, it would free up homes and the movement of people, helping more first-time buyers on to the ladder while encouraging downsizers out of family-sized homes.

Fairer Share’s calculations, based on data from 2020 showing 270,000 long-term empty homes in England, could be an underestimate, however, with the latest official statistics revealing that the number of vacant homes stood at 665,000 in October 2020.

Chris Bailey, the campaigns manager at Action on Empty Homes, says that homes are often inherited by families who don’t have the money, time or energy to renovate them. “Some remain empty for years or even decades, often ending up in a run-down state sold at auction. They are a wasted resource,” he says. “With so much focus on working towards net zero, making best use of our housing stock should be a no-brainer.”

It might be a case of taking back control rather than building back better to solve the housing crisis.

New dataset reveals for the first time how many jobs are reachable by car and public transport in every small local area in Britain – exposing a shocking transport gap between North and South.

[This summary concentrates on the “Red Wall” constituencies but the full report also shows the particular problems faced by Devon and Cornwall. Neil O’Brian MP was one of the founders of the “Onward” think-tank in 2018. He has recently been appointed to Parliamentary Secretary of State, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities – Owl]

Robert Largan MP www.ukonward.com

If Levelling Up is to mean anything, then it must be about fixing the transport inequalities between regions. I sincerely hope the Government take this report on board carefully.

How many jobs can you reach within an hour’s drive or 90 minutes on public transport from your front door?

We have created a brand new dataset that for the first time reveals the number of jobs accessible by car and public transport from every local area (LSOA) in the country across different time horizons. The subsequent analysis, Network Effects, exposes a yawning transport gap between different parts of the country:

• Public transport is so poorly connected in some parts of England that people can access fewer jobs within an hour on public transport than they can reach within a 5-miles radius of their local area. In Stoke-on-Trent, Newcastle-under-Lyme and Bolsover, workers can access only around three-quarters of local jobs within an hour on public transport. This compares to some towns in London’s hinterland, like Redbridge, Barnet or Epping Forest, where an hour on public transport unlocks access to 7 times more jobs than exist locally.
• This transport gap becomes even clearer when comparing similarly sized towns in different parts of the country. Halifax in Yorkshire and Mansfield in Nottinghamshire have similar levels of population as Aldershot in Hampshire. But using public transport you can reach twice as many jobs within 90 minutes from Aldershot (1.2 million jobs) than from Halifax (581,837), and over four times as many as from Mansfield (246,857). Aldershot is 30 miles from London, while Halifax is 8 miles from Bradford and 14 miles from Leeds and Mansfield is within 14 miles of Nottingham, 22 miles from Derby and 30 miles from Sheffield.
• In some of Britain’s most important regional cities, public transport barely improves access to jobs at all. In Newcastle and Glasgow, an hour on public transport boosts job access by a third. This compares to London where public transport nearly quadruples local jobs access: i.e. there are 3.7 times as many jobs within 60 minutes on public transport as within a 5 mile radius.
• You can reach more than 50% more jobs within 30 minutes by car in parts of the Home Counties bordering Greater London (482,000 jobs) than you can in central Birmingham, reflecting the latter’s byzantine road network

The transport gap is particularly acute around towns in the Red Wall regions of the North West and West Yorkshire, where geographic proximity to jobs is no guarantee that workers will be able to reach them.

• In the Greater Manchester area, people in Prestwich, Droylsden and Blackley can access around 90% of the nearby jobs (within 5 miles), despite being just inside the M60 and close to the city centre. But people in Wigan, Rochdale and Bolton can access twice as many jobs within 60 minutes as there are locally.
• In West Yorkshire, towns in the middle of the conurbation like Batley, Brighouse and Mirfield can access only 94% of the jobs that exist locally by public transport, while Huddersfield or Bingley, which are further from Leeds and Bradford, can access 94% more jobs than exist locally.

This suggests that spending dedicated to public transport could be much better directed towards improving jobs access in Britain’s regional towns and cities, rather than improving transport in places that are already well-connected.

The report also suggests that the Government should not rely solely on transport investment to support stronger regional growth.

Successive governments have placed considerable emphasis on transport investment to unlock growth, with transport projects typically scoring higher on benefit cost ratios under the Treasury’s Green Book rules. However, our research suggests that this may be a mistake, as transport connectivity to jobs appears to have little overall bearing on the average income and productivity of a place:

• Only a small share of the local variation in median incomes is explained by the number of jobs accessible within 90 minutes by public transport, and access to jobs by car is not at all related to income. 
• Differences in income are far better explained by qualification levels and the mix of occupations and industries than by connectivity to jobs. These three combined account for over four-fifths of the variation in median income between places.
• This suggests that further transport investments will struggle to improve incomes and living standards in a place without addressing other economic fundamentals like education and the quality of jobs available.

We are publishing the dataset as open data

We have published the dataset openly to allow others to analyse it and create their own maps and graphs. Head over to our GitHub page to download all the journey time data used in this report. Please credit Onward if you do.

We are particularly grateful to Alasdair Rae, founder of Automatic Knowledge Ltd, who developed the measure of access to jobs used in this paper. A full methodology is available in the Annex of the full report.

From a correspondent:

On paper there is little doubt that development planning in East Devon has been well documented. 

The Government’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) recommends decision-making should be genuinely plan-led, to achieve high quality designs, conserve and enhance the natural environment, reduce pollution to support a low-carbon, climate-resilient economy, whilst taking account of the diverse character of different areas, by providing a framework within which local people and their accountable councils can produce their own distinctive local and neighbourhood plans which reflect the needs and priorities of their communities. 

The role of the Local Plan is to help set out what we want East Devon to be like in the years to come, the type of development we want to see and where development should occur and what benefits it will bring to our communities based on local insight. 

Moreover, the Bishops Clyst Neighbourhood Plan represents the community’s vision and priorities for how we would like to see our neighbourhood area evolve. It puts us, as a community, in the driving seat when it comes to having a say over what, how and where development should take place. 

Sadly, after the production of all these copious documents, containing a myriad of protective policies and advice in both our East Devon Local and Neighbourhood Plans – alongside the colossal amounts of time and public money expended in their preparation and approval – these policies were completely ignored by East Devon Planners in their decision on 20/1001/MOUT at Winslade Park, Clyst St Mary! So the reality is that Clyst St Mary’s vision and ideology for the future growth of their valued, special village were crushed, pulverised and brushed aside by politicians and officials exclusively for unproven, economic benefits for East Devon. 

There is anxiety that any future changes to our community will now be entirely developer-led and contain incalculable numbers of lucrative housing – but the promised sports, leisure, economic, social and environmental benefits to the community will be scaled down significantly. Will our primary school children learn to swim in the pledged indoor swimming pool, before they reach adulthood? Only, perhaps, with the loss of additional sports fields or agricultural land to more housing? The tried and tested developers’ mantra will be that without additional housing – the financial viability of the whole masterplan will be at risk! 

Meanwhile, the local residents watch as the directors of the development company fly-in regularly and land their private helicopter on the pledged community sports fields; they listen to the deep-throbbing engines of the directors’ Porsches parking in the car park adjacent to their homes, whilst these entrepreneurs banquet at the high cost, high-end Winslade Manor restaurant and bars!

However, this is expected behaviour from directors of development companies – so we can’t blame them for reaping the benefits and taking advantage while they can? So who is to blame? 

Burringtons’ proposals for 39 homes on a protected green field, together with their horrendous designs for 40 four-storey flats (that resemble 1960s urban car park designs) in this rural village, opposite a Grade II* Listed Manor House, are accelerating at speed through the local planning processes with two Reserved Matters applications submitted (21/2217/MRES and 21/2235/MRES) under consultation. 

Can those responsible for the flawed recommendations and decision-making at the outline planning stage, now ‘claw back’ some credibility within this neighbourhood, to ensure that the Reserved Matters plans represent the wishes of those people who actually live in this community? Can we not secure housing designs that will be judged with pride, that are sustainable and will not detrimentally affect many existing homes in this community? Can EDDC Planners build back better and more beautiful or has the damage already been done to gain economic benefits for East Devon that are unlikely to be achievable – so now there is no way back? Or can the decision-makers now condition the Reserved Matters to ensure that the benefits to the community are provided alongside the housing provision in a staged process? Otherwise the developers will give precedence to the development of the 79 homes by  ‘cherry- picking’ the lucrative 39 on a green field and 40 inappropriate, four-storey flats in a village with no local  housing need  – but  the much-valued community facilities will be relegated and banished! 

Will the economic benefits that were so lauded by EDDC’s professional and elected planners and resulted in them ignoring protective planning policies in the NPPF and the Local and Neighbourhood Plans, ever be realised post-pandemic with innumerable business employees now electing to ‘work from home’ in future and not requiring the 2,000 predicted jobs offered at Winslade Park to East Devon? 

Clyst St Mary wonders if these plans will follow the example of Cranbrook with thousands of houses but no town centre – or Axminster with a profusion of housing but with no ring road – or Newton Poppleford with increased housing but no doctors’ surgery or health centre – or more locally – 80 homes at Greenspires with no footpath provided for children to walk to the primary school? 

Are we to forget the dream and the vision of aesthetically-pleasing growth proposals that will stand the test of time and be admired in the future? Is the reality likely to be  that Clyst St Mary will be sacrificed to become a giant housing estate of urban sprawl with none of the pledged infrastructure, resulting in it losing its special characteristics as a valued  rural, historic village? 

The decision is in the hands of a few elected members of the Planning Committee on recommendations from EDDC’s planning officials – is this a lottery governed only by chance – or does the local authority actually have jurisdiction to control the future development of our communities?  For the answers  . . . . . Watch This Space! 

A fundraiser has been set up poking fun at a Tory MP who used a media interview to complain about his £82,000 salary amid a cost of living crisis.

www.independent.co.uk 

Sir Peter Bottomley, the Conservative MP for Worthing West and the Father of the House of Commons, described MPs’ pay packets as “really grim”, despite their wages putting them in the top 5 per cent of earners in the UK.

He called for members’ salaries to be boosted to somewhere in the region of £100,000, saying the situation was “desperately difficult” for newer MPs, adding: “I don’t know how they manage”.

Now, a Gofundme user going by the name of Simon Harris has shown his concern for Sir Peter by attempting to raise £20,000 to boost his earnings.

“Support this Tory MP struggling on £80k a year,” the page description reads.

“I am raising £20,000 for Sir Peter Bottomley who has courageously admitted that he is ‘struggling’ on the current MP’s salary of £80,000 per year,” it adds.

The page was created on Wednesday and has so far raised £70 from six generous donors.

In an interview with the New Statesman, published on the day when the £20 uplift to Universal Credit was axed, Sir Peter called for MPs to get a pay rise,  pointing out that their salaries do not cover expenses.

He suggested taxpayers should foot the bill for the things the rest of the public has to pay for, such as food and travel.

The median salary in the UK is just over £31,000, according to the Office for National Statistics, while those paid in excess of £80,000 are in the top 5 per cent of earners.

An increase of £18,000 a year to MPs’ salaries would represent a rise of almost 22 per cent.

The government this year offered NHS staff a rise of 3 per cent.

Speaking on LBC Radio on Thursday morning, Sir Peter defended his comments and suggested he would be in favour of slashing numbers in the Commons in order to increase MPs’ pay.

He also claimed that “a good teacher, a good social worker or a good trade union official” would be “significantly worse off” if they went into politics.

According to the government’s Get Into Teaching website, a qualified teacher working in inner London can earn a maximum of £50,953 and up to £41,604 for the rest of England and Wales.

The median salary for a social workers is £37,000 according to payscale.com.

Trade union officials can earn between £30,000 to £80,000, according to the National Careers Service.

Private hospitals treated a total of just eight Covid patients a day during the pandemic despite a multi-billion pound deal with the government to help stop the NHS being overwhelmed, a report reveals.

Denis Campbell www.theguardian.com

And they also performed far fewer operations on NHS-funded patients than usual, even though hospitals has suspended much non-Covid care, according to research by a thinktank.

The Treasury agreed in March 2020 to pay for a deal to block-book the entire capacity of all 7,956 beds in England’s 187 private hospitals along with their almost 20,000 staff to help supplement the NHS’s efforts to cope with the unfolding pandemic. It is believed to have cost £400m a month.

However, the Centre for Health and the Public Interest’s report (Pdf) says that on 39% of days between March 2020 and March this year, private hospitals treated no Covid patients at all and on a further 20% of days they cared for only one person. Overall, they provided only 3,000 of the 3.6m Covid bed days in those 13 months – just 0.08% of the total.

And while private hospitals undertook 3.6m NHS-funded planned procedures the year before, that dropped to only 2m during the first year of the pandemic – a fall of 43% – the thinktank says. Its conclusions are based on its analysis of two major sets of published NHS activity data.

“Despite the fact that the taxpayer paid undisclosed billions to the private hospital sector, which prevented some of the companies going bust, the official data shows that they barely treated any Covid patients and delivered less elective work for the NHS than they did prior to the pandemic,” said Sid Ryan, a researcher at the CHPI who wrote the report.

The NHS’s “under-utilisation of the private hospital sector” should not have surprised ministers, Ryan added, “because private hospitals may have beds and operating theatres, but they rely on NHS staff to carry out operations, and these NHS staff were busy working in NHS hospitals. Which begs the question: why then did the government agree to this generous deal?”

At the time NHS England (NHSE) lauded the deal as a vital way of boosting healthcare capacity at a time when it was feared that NHS hospitals would run out of space to treat Covid sufferers. In two letters to the wider NHS explaining why the deal had been struck and what it would cover, senior NHS officials were clear that it would include care for Covid patients with serious breathing problems as well as routine operations, such as hip and knee replacements.

Ryan criticised the continuing secrecy around the contract. Neither ministers nor NHSE have ever disclosed how much it cost the Treasury or given a breakdown of the number of non-Covid procedures that resulted.

Labour MP Meg Hillier, who chairs the Commons public accounts committee, said the findings showed the government and NHS had got poor value for money from the very expensive deal.

“Millions of pounds of unfit PPE languishing in costly storage and the £530m spent on unused Nightingale hospitals, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has repeatedly demonstrated its lack of competence in dealing with the private sector.

“Here taxpayers have covered an entire year of private hospitals’ costs in return for less treatment and care than before, and many of them now feel forced to pay those same private hospitals over again in the face of an NHS beset with lengthy backlogs.”

The DHSC should be open about how much care private hospitals did provide and try to claw back moneys for treatment that was paid for but not given, she added.

Under questioning by Hillier at the PAC in June 2020 Simon Stevens, NHSE’s then chief executive, promised to write to her disclosing how many of the 8,000 beds had been used and how much the deal was costing. However, when NHS England’s chief financial officer, Julian Kelly, later replied on Stevens’ behalf, he said the contract had cost £853m in just over its first four months but did not clarify how many beds had been pressed into service.

The Independent Healthcare Providers Network, which negotiated the deal on behalf of private hospitals, insisted that it was never intended to cover people with Covid, despite NHS England’s two letters making it clear that such patients were included.

“Given that the NHS asked the independent sector to maintain Covid-free sites for vulnerable patients including those with cancer it is not surprising that few Covid patients were treated in independent hospitals. To have done so would not have been appropriate or safe,” said David Hare, the IHPN’s chief executive.

He added that more than 3.2 million NHS patients were treated in the independent sector under the contract, without which the NHS’s 5.6m-strong backlog would be even bigger.

A DHSC spokesperson said: “We will make no apology for ensuring that the NHS has the resources it needs to provide care for patients during a global pandemic. The primary aim of the independent sector deal was to treat non-Covid 19 patients, providing urgent cancer services and other life-saving treatments.”

The contract meant that “around two million consultations, tests, operations and chemotherapy sessions for NHS patients [took place] between March 2020 and the end of 2020”, they added – far fewer than the 3.2m claimed by the IHPN.